Bibliography for BPLN0032: Critical Debates in Urban Design BETA

1.

ALI MADANIPOUR: Ambiguities of urban design. The Town Planning Review. 68, 363–383 (1997).

2.

Biddulph, M.: The Problem with Thinking about or for Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design. 17, 1–20 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.646251.

3.

Talen, E.: Design for Diversity: Evaluating the Context of Socially Mixed Neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design. 11, 1–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500490588.

4.

Dovey, K., Pafka, E.: The urban density assemblage: Modelling multiple measures. URBAN DESIGN International. 19, 66–76 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.13.

5.

Kropf, Karl: Morphological investigations: Cutting into the substance of urban form.

6.

Montgomery, J.: Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design. 3, 93–116 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418.

7.

Degen, M.M., Rose, G.: The Sensory Experiencing of Urban Design: The Role of Walking and Perceptual Memory. Urban Studies. 49, 3271–3287 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012440463.

8.

Sepe, M., Pitt, M.: The characters of place in urban design. URBAN DESIGN International. 19, 215–227 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.32.

9.

Gjerde, M.: Visual evaluation of urban streetscapes: How do public preferences reconcile with those held by experts? URBAN DESIGN International. 16, 153–161 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2011.10.

10.

Forsyth, Ann: What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design.

11.

Brenner, N.: What is critical urban theory? City. 13, 198–207 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902996466.

12.

An Introduction to Critical Thinking by Steven D. Schafersman.

13.

Marshall, S. (2012) Science, pseudo-science and urban design.

14.

Cuthbert, A.: Whose Urban Design? Journal of Urban Design. 15, 443–448 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.487816.

15.

Cuthbert, A.R.: Urban design: requiem for an era – review and critique of the last 50 years. Urban Design International. 12, 177–223 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000200.

16.

Wunderlich, F Carmona, M: Place-temporality and rhythmicity: a new aesthetics and methodological foundation for urban design theory and practice, http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_EPR_DS1389076&indx=2&recIds=UCL_EPR_DS1389076&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Place-temporality%20and%20rhythmicity&dstmp=1481108304046.

17.

Urban Design, Space and Society - Ali Madanipour - Palgrave Higher Education, https://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/urban-design-space-and-society-ali-madanipour/?sf1=barcode&st1=9781137023650.

18.

Krieger, A., Saunders, W.S.: Urban design. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2009).

19.

Krieger, A., Saunders, W.S.: Urban design. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2009).

20.

Tonkiss, F.: Cities by design: the social life of urban form. Polity, Cambridge (2013).

21.

Hirt, S., Zahm, D.L., Jacobs, J.: The urban wisdom of Jane Jacobs. Routledge, London (2012).

22.

Moreno, G. ; Steadman, P.: The relationship between density, built form and design.

23.

Montgomery, J.: Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design. 3, 93–116 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418.

24.

Rowley, A.: Mixed-use Development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking? Planning Practice & Research. 11, 85–98 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459650036477.

25.

Mehta, V.: Lively Streets: Determining Environmental Characteristics to Support Social Behavior. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 27, 165–187 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X07307947.

26.

Coupland, A.: Reclaiming the city: mixed use development. E & FN Spon, London (1997).

27.

Nasar, J.L.: Does Neotraditional Development Build Community? Journal of Planning Education and Research. 23, 58–68 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03256224.

28.

Talen, E.: Design for Diversity: Evaluating the Context of Socially Mixed Neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design. 11, 1–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500490588.

29.

Steadman, P.: Density and Built Form: Integrating ‘Spacemate’ with the Work of Martin and March. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 41, 341–358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1068/b39141.

30.

Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity, http://www.corridordevelopment.org/pdfs/from_MDC_Website/db9.pdf.

31.

Uytenhaak, R., Technische Universiteit Delft. Faculteit Bouwkunde: Cities full of space: qualities of density. 010, Rotterdam (2008).

32.

Short, M.J.: Planning for tall buildings. Routledge, London (2012).

33.

Grant, J.: The dark side of the grid: power and urban design. Planning Perspectives. 16, 219–241 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/02665430152469575.

34.

Marshall, S. ; Sutton, M.: Explorations in generative street layouts.

35.

Mehta, V.: The street: a quintessential social public space. Routledge, London (2013).

36.

Kropf, K.: Ambiguity in the definition of built form.

37.

Hebbert, M.: Historical exploration/explanation in urban design.

38.

Moving Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Cities - CityLab, http://www.citylab.com/design/2014/11/moving-toward-an-evolutionary-theory-of-cities/381839/.

39.

Jones, P., Boujenko, N., Marshall, S.: Link & place: a guide to street planning and design. Local Transport Today, London (2007).

40.

Lynch, K.: A theory of good city form. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1981).

41.

Montgomery, J.: Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design. 3, 93–116 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418.

42.

Jacobs, J.: The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York (1961).

43.

Gehl, J.: Life between buildings: using public space. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1987).

44.

Jiang, B.: Street hierarchies: a minority of streets account for a majority of traffic flow. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 23, 1033–1048 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802004648.

45.

Cullen, G.: The concise townscape. Architectural Press, London (1971).

46.

Banerjee, T., Loukaitou-Sideris, A.: Companion to urban design. Routledge, London (2011).

47.

Sepe, M., Pitt, M.: The characters of place in urban design. URBAN DESIGN International. 19, 215–227 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.32.

48.

Buttimer, A., Seamon, D.: The human experience of space and place. Croom Helm, London (1980).

49.

Wunderlich, FM: Walking and Rhythmicity: Sensing Urban Space, http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_EPR_DS1314823&indx=1&recIds=UCL_EPR_DS1314823&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Walking%20and%20Rhythmicity%3A%20Sensing%20Urban%20Space&dstmp=1481113818322.

50.

Wunderlich, F: Place-temporality and urban place-rhythms in urban analysis and design: an aesthetic akin to music, http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_EPR_DS1360918&indx=2&recIds=UCL_EPR_DS1360918&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Place-temporality%20and%20urban%20place-rhythms%20in%20Urban%20Analysis%20and%20Design&dstmp=1481113928607.

51.

Questions to Ask A Space, https://placesjournal.org/assets/legacy/pdfs/questions-to-ask-a-space.pdf.

52.

Gehl, J.: Cities for people. Island Press, Washington, D.C. (2010).

53.

Forsyth, Ann: What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design.

54.

Nasar, Jack: Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors.

55.

Adkins, A., Dill, J., Luhr, G., Neal, M.: Unpacking Walkability: Testing the Influence of Urban Design Features on Perceptions of Walking Environment Attractiveness. Journal of Urban Design. 17, 499–510 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2012.706365.

56.

Spencer, C., Woolley, H.: Children and the city: a summary of recent environmental psychology research. Child: Care, Health and Development. 26, 181–198 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00125.x.

57.

Lefaivre, L., Döll, H.: Ground up city: play as a design tool. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam (2007).

58.

Stevens, Q.: The ludic city: exploring the potential of public spaces. Routledge, London (2007).

59.

Franck, K.A., Stevens, Q.: Loose space: possibility and diversity in urban life. Routledge, Abingdon (2007).

60.

Sepe, M.: Places and perceptions in contemporary city. URBAN DESIGN International. 18, 111–113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.1.

61.

Urban Play: designing the urban landscape | The Mobile City, http://themobilecity.nl/2008/11/03/urban-play/.