1.
ALI MADANIPOUR. Ambiguities of urban design. The Town Planning Review 68, 363–383 (1997).
2.
Biddulph, M. The Problem with Thinking about or for Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design 17, 1–20 (2012).
3.
Talen, E. Design for Diversity: Evaluating the Context of Socially Mixed Neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design 11, 1–32 (2006).
4.
Dovey, K. & Pafka, E. The urban density assemblage: Modelling multiple measures. URBAN DESIGN International 19, 66–76 (2014).
5.
Kropf, Karl. Morphological investigations: Cutting into the substance of urban form.
6.
Montgomery, J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design 3, 93–116 (1998).
7.
Degen, M. M. & Rose, G. The Sensory Experiencing of Urban Design: The Role of Walking and Perceptual Memory. Urban Studies 49, 3271–3287 (2012).
8.
Sepe, M. & Pitt, M. The characters of place in urban design. URBAN DESIGN International 19, 215–227 (2014).
9.
Gjerde, M. Visual evaluation of urban streetscapes: How do public preferences reconcile with those held by experts? URBAN DESIGN International 16, 153–161 (2011).
10.
Forsyth, Ann. What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design.
11.
Brenner, N. What is critical urban theory? City 13, 198–207 (2009).
12.
An Introduction to Critical Thinking by Steven D. Schafersman.
13.
Marshall, S. (2012) Science, pseudo-science and urban design.
14.
Cuthbert, A. Whose Urban Design? Journal of Urban Design 15, 443–448 (2010).
15.
Cuthbert, A. R. Urban design: requiem for an era – review and critique of the last 50 years. Urban Design International 12, 177–223 (2007).
16.
Wunderlich, F Carmona, M. Place-temporality and rhythmicity: a new aesthetics and methodological foundation for urban design theory and practice. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_EPR_DS1389076&indx=2&recIds=UCL_EPR_DS1389076&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Place-temporality%20and%20rhythmicity&dstmp=1481108304046.
17.
Urban Design, Space and Society - Ali Madanipour - Palgrave Higher Education. https://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/urban-design-space-and-society-ali-madanipour/?sf1=barcode&st1=9781137023650.
18.
Krieger, A. & Saunders, W. S. Urban design. (University of Minnesota Press, 2009).
19.
Krieger, A. & Saunders, W. S. Urban design. (University of Minnesota Press, 2009).
20.
Tonkiss, F. Cities by design: the social life of urban form. (Polity, 2013).
21.
Hirt, S., Zahm, D. L. & Jacobs, J. The urban wisdom of Jane Jacobs. vol. Planning, history and environment series (Routledge, 2012).
22.
Moreno, G. ; Steadman, P. The relationship between density, built form and design.
23.
Montgomery, J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design 3, 93–116 (1998).
24.
Rowley, A. Mixed-use Development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking? Planning Practice & Research 11, 85–98 (1996).
25.
Mehta, V. Lively Streets: Determining Environmental Characteristics to Support Social Behavior. Journal of Planning Education and Research 27, 165–187 (2007).
26.
Coupland, A. Reclaiming the city: mixed use development. (E & FN Spon, 1997).
27.
Nasar, J. L. Does Neotraditional Development Build Community? Journal of Planning Education and Research 23, 58–68 (2003).
28.
Talen, E. Design for Diversity: Evaluating the Context of Socially Mixed Neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design 11, 1–32 (2006).
29.
Steadman, P. Density and Built Form: Integrating ‘Spacemate’ with the Work of Martin and March. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 41, 341–358 (2014).
30.
Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity.
31.
Uytenhaak, R. & Technische Universiteit Delft. Faculteit Bouwkunde. Cities full of space: qualities of density. (010, 2008).
32.
Short, M. J. Planning for tall buildings. (Routledge, 2012).
33.
Grant, J. The dark side of the grid: power and urban design. Planning Perspectives 16, 219–241 (2001).
34.
Marshall, S. ; Sutton, M. Explorations in generative street layouts.
35.
Mehta, V. The street: a quintessential social public space. (Routledge, 2013).
36.
Kropf, K. Ambiguity in the definition of built form.
37.
Hebbert, M. Historical exploration/explanation in urban design.
38.
Moving Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Cities - CityLab. http://www.citylab.com/design/2014/11/moving-toward-an-evolutionary-theory-of-cities/381839/.
39.
Jones, P., Boujenko, N. & Marshall, S. Link & place: a guide to street planning and design. (Local Transport Today, 2007).
40.
Lynch, K. A theory of good city form. (MIT Press, 1981).
41.
Montgomery, J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design 3, 93–116 (1998).
42.
Jacobs, J. The death and life of great American cities. (Random House, 1961).
43.
Gehl, J. Life between buildings: using public space. (Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1987).
44.
Jiang, B. Street hierarchies: a minority of streets account for a majority of traffic flow. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 23, 1033–1048 (2009).
45.
Cullen, G. The concise townscape. (Architectural Press, 1971).
46.
Banerjee, T. & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. Companion to urban design. (Routledge, 2011).
47.
Sepe, M. & Pitt, M. The characters of place in urban design. URBAN DESIGN International 19, 215–227 (2014).
48.
Buttimer, A. & Seamon, D. The human experience of space and place. (Croom Helm, 1980).
49.
Wunderlich, FM. Walking and Rhythmicity: Sensing Urban Space. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_EPR_DS1314823&indx=1&recIds=UCL_EPR_DS1314823&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Walking%20and%20Rhythmicity%3A%20Sensing%20Urban%20Space&dstmp=1481113818322.
50.
Wunderlich, F. Place-temporality and urban place-rhythms in urban analysis and design: an aesthetic akin to music. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_EPR_DS1360918&indx=2&recIds=UCL_EPR_DS1360918&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Place-temporality%20and%20urban%20place-rhythms%20in%20Urban%20Analysis%20and%20Design&dstmp=1481113928607.
51.
Questions to Ask A Space.
52.
Gehl, J. Cities for people. (Island Press, 2010).
53.
Forsyth, Ann. What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design.
54.
Nasar, Jack. Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors.
55.
Adkins, A., Dill, J., Luhr, G. & Neal, M. Unpacking Walkability: Testing the Influence of Urban Design Features on Perceptions of Walking Environment Attractiveness. Journal of Urban Design 17, 499–510 (2012).
56.
Spencer, C. & Woolley, H. Children and the city: a summary of recent environmental psychology research. Child: Care, Health and Development 26, 181–198 (2000).
57.
Lefaivre, L. & Döll, H. Ground up city: play as a design tool. (010 Publishers, 2007).
58.
Stevens, Q. The ludic city: exploring the potential of public spaces. (Routledge, 2007).
59.
Franck, K. A. & Stevens, Q. Loose space: possibility and diversity in urban life. (Routledge, 2007).
60.
Sepe, M. Places and perceptions in contemporary city. URBAN DESIGN International 18, 111–113 (2013).
61.
Urban Play: designing the urban landscape | The Mobile City. http://themobilecity.nl/2008/11/03/urban-play/.