Bibliography for LAWSG103: Corporate Finance: BETA

1.

Justis: the online legal library of UK, EU and Irish law [Internet]. Available from: http://www.justis.com/

2.

LexisNexis: Business Solutions & Software for Legal, Education and Government [Internet]. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/home.page

3.

High Court of Australia [Internet]. Available from: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/

4.

UK Statute law database [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/

5.

Ferran, Eilís. Principles of corporate finance law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

6.

Davies, P. L. Introduction to company law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

7.

Kraakman, Reinier H. The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

8.

Ferran, Eilís. Principles of corporate finance law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

9.

Lowry, John P., Reisberg, Arad, Pettet, B. G. Pettet’s company law: company law and corporate finance. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2012.

10.

Prentice, Daniel D., Reisberg, Arad. Corporate finance law in the UK and EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

11.

Gullifer, Louise, Payne, Jennifer. Corporate finance law: principles and policy. Oxford: Hart; 2011.

12.

French, Derek. Blackstone’s statutes on company law, 2012-2013 [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/12342801?style=html&title=Blackstone’s%20statutes%20on%20company%20law%2C%202012-2013

13.

Lowry, John P., Reisberg, Arad, Pettet, B. G. Pettet’s company law: company law and corporate finance. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2012.

14.

Dignam, Alan J., Lowry, John P. Company law. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

15.

Davies, P. L., Worthington, Sarah, Gower, L. C. B. Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2012.

16.

Hannigan, Brenda. Company law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

17.

Parkinson, J. E. Corporate power and responsibility: issues in the theory of company law [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 1993. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198259893.001.0001

18.

Cheffins, Brian R. Company law: theory, structure, and operation. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1996.

19.

Ferran, Eilís. *Principles of corporate finance law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

20.

Kraakman, Reinier H. The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

21.

McGee, Andrew. Share capital. Haywards Heath: Tottel; 2007.

22.

Department of Trade & Industry. Modern company law for a competitive economy: completing the structure. Great Britain. Company Law Review. Steering Group; 2000; Available from: http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/16915560?style=html&title=Modern%20company%20law%20for%20a%20competitive%20economycompleting

23.

Department of Trade & Industry. Modernising company law, White paper (URN 02/1088). Norwich: TSO; 2002.

24.

Great Britain. Company law reform. London: Stationery Office; 2005.

25.

Ferran, Eilis. Company Law Reform in the UK: A Progress Report [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/32099948?style=html&title=Company%20Law%20Reform%20in%20the%20UK%3A%20A%20Progress%20Report.

26.

Court of Appeal. Colonial bank v Whinney: 30 Ch. D 261 [Internet]. 1885. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I8BE30760E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

27.

Chancery Division. Borland’s Bank v Steel Brothers & Co. Ltd: 1 Ch 279 at 288 [Internet]. 1901. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I76C06A30E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

28.

*Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd: AC 22 [Internet]. 1897. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YHW0-TWW4-21F8&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

29.

Short v Treasury Commissioners 1 KB 116 [Internet]. 1948. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T18552647146&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T18552647154&backKey=20_T18552647155&csi=296982&docNo=4&scrollToPosition=798

30.

Fidelis Oditah. Takeovers, share exchanges and the meaning of loss. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1996;112(Jul):424–445. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=ICCE8D940E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

31.

H.W. Higginson. Takeovers, share exchanges and the meaning of loss. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1997;113(Jan):51–53. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=ICCDEC720E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

32.

Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd 2 BCLC 773 [Internet]. 2001. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T18553034885&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T18553034887&backKey=20_T18553034888&csi=280378&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=456

33.

Ross Grantham. *The Doctrinal Basis of the Rights of Company Shareholders. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 1998;57(3):554–588. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4508493

34.

*Gambotto v WCP Ltd HCA 12, 182 CLR 432 at 447 [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-FHS0-TWW4-21NH&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

35.

House of Lords. Birch v Cropper 14 App Cas 525 [Internet]. 1889. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I74AD8FC0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

36.

UK Government. Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

37.

Murray A. Pickering. The Problem of the Preference Share. The Modern Law Review [Internet]. Wiley; 1963;26(5):499–519. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1092526

38.

House of Lords. *Birch v Cropper 14 App Cas 525 [Internet]. 1889. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I74AD8FC0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

39.

Court of Chancery. Webb v Earle L.R. 20 Eq 556 [Internet]. 1875. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF73129B0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

40.

Chancery Division. *Evling v Israel & Oppenheimer 1 Ch 101 [Internet]. 1918. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IA2B59E80E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

41.

Court of Appeal. Re Wakley 2 Ch 205 [Internet]. 1920. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IEF44CFE0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

42.

Re Crichtons Oil 2 Ch 86 [Internet]. 1902. p. 95–96. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXW-1T00-TWW4-219T&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

43.

Chancery Division. Re Roberts & Cooper Ltd 2 Ch 383 [Internet]. 1929. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I88D73180E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

44.

Chancery Division. Re Wharfedale Brewery Ltd Ch 913 [Internet]. 1952. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF8B18820E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

45.

Chancery Division. Dimbula Valley (Ceylon) Tea Co Ltd v Laurie [Internet]. 1961. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I991F8C50E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

46.

House of Lords. *House of Fraser v ACGE BCLC 478 [Internet]. 1987. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IC3D87010E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

47.

UK Government. Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

48.

Court of Appeal. White v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd Ch 65, 2 WLR 144 [Internet]. 1953. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF8EC9550E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

49.

*Re Northern Engineering Industries plc 2 BCLC 704 [Internet]. 1994. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV60-TWW8-0097&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

50.

UK Government. Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

51.

Centros Ltd v Erhervs-og Selskabsstyrelsen (C212/97) Ch 446 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-6CY0-TXD6-Y1N6&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

52.

High Level Group of Company Law Experts. A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe [Internet]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/search_en.htm?hl=en&as_sitesearch=ec.europa.eu%2Finternal_market%2F&cx=010624300341678344703%3A_u-3r0niuzu&cof=FORID%3A9&q=A+Modern+Regulatory+Framework+for+Company+Law+in+Europe&sa.x=0&sa.y=0

53.

Rickford J. *Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review [Internet]. 2004;15(4):919–1027. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29

54.

Armour J. *Legal Capital: an Outdated Concept? European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR). 2006 Mar;7(01).

55.

Rickford J. Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review [Internet]. 2004;15(4):919–1027. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29

56.

Grantham R, Rickett CEF. Corporate personality, limited liability and the protection of creditors. Corporate personality in the 20th century. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 1998.

57.

Enriques L, Macey JR. *Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the European legal capital rules. Cornell law review [Internet]. 86(6):1165–1166. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/api/version1/sr?date=2001&sr=Creditors+versus+capital+formation%3A+The+case+against+the+European+legal+capital+rules&csi=7333&secondRedirectIndicator=true

58.

Armour J. Legal Capital: an Outdated Concept? European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR). 2006 Mar;7(01).

59.

Gedge, Montagu L., Great Britain. Report of the Committee on Shares of No Par Value. London: H.M.S.O.; 1954.

60.

UK Government. *Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

61.

House of Lords. *Ooregum Gold Mining Co v Roper AC 125 [Internet]. 1892. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I1438EA30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

62.

UK Government. Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

63.

*Mosely v Koffyfontein Mines Ltd 2 Ch 108 [Internet]. 1904. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JWD-4KM0-TXD6-Y05T&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

64.

UK Government. *Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

65.

*Re Wragge Ltd 1 Ch 796, 836 [Internet]. 1897. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJ60-TWW4-202W&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

66.

*Re Bradford Investments plc (No 2) BCC 379 [Internet]. 1991. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00FF&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

67.

Gedge, Montagu L., Great Britain. Report of the Committee on Shares of No Par Value. London: H.M.S.O.; 1954.

68.

Great Britain. Report of the Company Law Committee. London: HMSO; 1962.

69.

House of Lords. Ooregum Gold Mining Co v Roper AC 125 [Internet]. 1892. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I1438EA30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

70.

Department of Trade & Industry. Modern company law for a competitive economy: completing the structure (URN 00/1335), Final Report (URN 01/942). Great Britain. Company Law Review. Steering Group; 2000.

71.

Department of Trade & Industry. Modernising company law, Cm 5553-I (URN 02/1088). Norwich: TSO; 2002.

72.

Department of Trade & Industry. Company law reform (URN 05/928). London: Stationery Office; 2005.

73.

Rickford J. *Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review [Internet]. 2004;15(4):919–1027. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29

74.

Gedge, Montagu L., Great Britain. Report of the Committee on Shares of No Par Value. London: H.M.S.O.; 1954.

75.

Department of Trade & Industry. Modernising company law, White paper (URN 02/1088). Norwich: TSO; 2002.

76.

Department of Trade & Industry. Company law reform (URN 05/928). London: Stationery Office; 2005.

77.

Rickford J. Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review [Internet]. 2004;15(4):919–1027. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29

78.

UK Government. *Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

79.

Mutual Life Insurance of New York v Rank Organisation BCLC 11 [Internet]. 1985. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00CD&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

80.

Chancery Division. Clemens v Clemens Bros Ltd 2 All ER 268 [Internet]. 1976. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I564AA3B0E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

81.

Privy Council (Australia). Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Ltd AC 821 [Internet]. 1974. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IC4043B00E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

82.

UK Government. Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

83.

UK Government. Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

84.

Court of Appeal. White v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd Ch 65, 2 WLR 144 [Internet]. 1953. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF8EC9550E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

85.

House of Lords. *Hilder v Dexter AC 474 [Internet]. 1902. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IC04166A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

86.

Chancery Division. *Shearer v Bercain Ltd 3 All ER 295 [Internet]. 1980. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I9F5B5220E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

87.

UK Government. *Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

88.

*Re Joseph Holt plc 2 BCLC 604 [Internet]. 2001. p. 621–631. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-016F&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

89.

Ferran E. Legal Capital and the Pressure of the Securities Markets. Capital markets and company law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

90.

Hopt, Klaus J., Wymeersch, E. Capital markets and company law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

91.

Mayer C, Franks J. Governance as a source of managerial discipline [Internet]. National Bank of Belgium; 2002. Available from: http://www.nbb.be/pub/06_00_00_00_00/06_03_00_00_00/06_03_05_00_00.htm?l=en

92.

UK Government. *Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

93.

Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Precision Dippings Ltd v Precision Dippings Marketing Ltd Ch 447 [Internet]. 1986. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I2877B711E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

94.

Re Cleveland Trust plc BCLC 424 [Internet]. 1991. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV60-TWW8-00BG&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

95.

Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Bairstow v Queens Moat Houses plc 2 BCLC 531 [Internet]. 2001. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I6DCFBFC0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

96.

Jennifer Payne. Unjust enrichment, trusts and recipient liability for unlawful dividends. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2003;119(Oct):583–607. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7E6DC5C1E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

97.

Enriques L, Macey JR. *Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the European legal capital rules. Cornell law review [Internet]. 86(6):1165–1166. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/api/version1/sr?date=2001&sr=Creditors+versus+capital+formation%3A+The+case+against+the+European+legal+capital+rules&csi=7333&secondRedirectIndicator=true

98.

Associated British Engineering Ltd v IRC 1 KB 15 [Internet]. 1941. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXP-6730-TWW4-20KD&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

99.

Chancery Division. Topham v Charles Topham Gp Ltd 1 BCLC 123 [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=ID6AB3460E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

100.

Chancery Division. EIC Services v Phipps 3 All ER 804 [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IA03DE7C0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

101.

Capital maintenance: other issues: a consultation document from the Company Law Review Steering Group (URN 00/880). London: DTI; 2000.

102.

Department of Trade & Industry. Company law reform (URN 05/928). London: Stationery Office; 2005.

103.

Rickford J. *Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review [Internet]. 2004;15(4):919–1027. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29

104.

Tham, Chee Ho. Unjust enrichment and unlawful dividends: a step too far? The Cambridge law journal [Internet]. 2005;64(1):177–211. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25166349

105.

Enriques L, Macey JR. Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the European legal capital rules. Cornell law review [Internet]. 86(6):1165–1166. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/api/version1/sr?date=2001&sr=Creditors+versus+capital+formation%3A+The+case+against+the+European+legal+capital+rules&csi=7333&secondRedirectIndicator=true

106.

*Trevor v Whitworth 12 App Cas 409 [Internet]. 1887. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YK10-TWW4-2108&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

107.

Barclays Bank plc v British & Commonwealth Holdings plc BCC 19 (affirmed [1995] BCC 1059) [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXN-S790-TWW4-20B3&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

108.

UK Government. *Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

109.

Chancery Division. Acatos & Hutcheson v Watson 1 BCLC 218 [Internet]. 1994. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I315BD600E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

110.

Re R W Peak Ltd BCC 596 [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-J4J0-TWW4-21BT&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

111.

Geoffrey Morse. The introduction of treasury shares into English law and practice. Journal of business law [Internet]. 2004;(May):303–331. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I7E5D23F0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

112.

UK Government. *Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

113.

Re Jupiter House Investments Ltd BCLC 222 [Internet]. 1985. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00FH&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

114.

Re Grosvenor Press plc BCLC 286 [Internet]. 1985. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00PP&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

115.

*Re Chatterley-Whitfield Collieries Ltd 2 All ER 593 [Internet]. 1948. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CRN-PP70-TWP1-60B1&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

116.

Re Saltdean Estate Co Ltd 3 All ER 829 [Internet]. 1968. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-35T0-TWP1-613K&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

117.

Re Northern Engineering Industries plc 2 BCLC 704 [Internet]. 1994. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV60-TWW8-0097&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

118.

CLR, Company Formation and Capital Maintenance URN 99/1145 [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file23277.pdf

119.

Department of Trade & Industry. Company law reform. London: Stationery Office; 2005.

120.

Ferran, Eilís. *Principles of corporate finance law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

121.

UK Government. *Companies Act 2006 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

122.

Eilís Ferran. *Corporate Transactions and Financial Assistance: Shifting Policy Perceptions but Static Law. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2004;63(1):225–243. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4509081

123.

Ferran E. Regulation of Private Equity - Backed Leveraged Buyout Activity in Europe. SSRN Electronic Journal [Internet]. 2007; Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=989748

124.

Hans C. Hirt. The scope of prohibited financial assistance after MT Realisations Ltd (in liquidation) v Digital Equipment Co Ltd. Company Lawyer [Internet]. 2004;25(1):9–19. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I7E5DE740E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

125.

*Brady v Brady AC 755 [Internet]. 1989. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXT-SRW0-TWW4-2172&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

126.

Barclays Bank v British & Commonwealth Holdings plc BCC 1059 [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXN-S790-TWW4-20B3&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

127.

Court of Appeal (Civil Division). MT Realisations v Digital Equipment Co Ltd 2 BCLC 688 (Ch D); 2 BCLC 117 (CA) [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I065A31D0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

128.

Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Chaston v SWP Group plc 1 BCLC 675 [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I863B9480E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

129.

Re Hill & Tyler Ltd EWHC 1261 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P0BR&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

130.

Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Dyment v Boyden 1 WLR 792 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I9C8FFAF0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

131.

CLR, Company Formation and Capital Maintenance URN 99/1145 [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file23277.pdf

132.

CLR, Developing the Framework, URN 00/656 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121029131934/http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/businesslaw/co-act-2006/clr-review/page25086.html

133.

High Level Group of Company Law Experts. A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe [Internet]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/search_en.htm?hl=en&as_sitesearch=ec.europa.eu%2Finternal_market%2F&cx=010624300341678344703%3A_u-3r0niuzu&cof=FORID%3A9&q=A+Modern+Regulatory+Framework+for+Company+Law+in+Europe&sa.x=0&sa.y=0

134.

Department of Trade & Industry. Company law reform. London: Stationery Office; 2005.

135.

Eilís Ferran. Corporate Transactions and Financial Assistance: Shifting Policy Perceptions but Static Law. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2004;63(1):225–243. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4509081