1.
Justis: the online legal library of UK, EU and Irish law. http://www.justis.com/
2.
LexisNexis: Business Solutions & Software for Legal, Education and Government. http://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/home.page
3.
High Court of Australia. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/
4.
UK Statute law database. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/
5.
Ferran, Eilís. Principles of Corporate Finance Law. Oxford University Press; 2008.
6.
Davies, P. L. Introduction to Company Law. Vol Clarendon law series. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
7.
Kraakman, Reinier H. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2009.
8.
Ferran, Eilís. Principles of Corporate Finance Law. Oxford University Press; 2008.
9.
Lowry, John P., Reisberg, Arad, Pettet, B. G. Pettet’s Company Law: Company Law and Corporate Finance. Vol Longman law series. 4th ed. Pearson; 2012.
10.
Prentice, Daniel D., Reisberg, Arad. Corporate Finance Law in the UK and EU. Oxford University Press; 2011.
11.
Gullifer, Louise, Payne, Jennifer. Corporate Finance Law: Principles and Policy. Hart; 2011.
12.
French, Derek. Blackstone’s Statutes on Company Law, 2012-2013. Oxford University Press; 2012. http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/12342801?style=html&title=Blackstone’s%20statutes%20on%20company%20law%2C%202012-2013
13.
Lowry, John P., Reisberg, Arad, Pettet, B. G. Pettet’s Company Law: Company Law and Corporate Finance. Vol Longman law series. 4th ed. Pearson; 2012.
14.
Dignam, Alan J., Lowry, John P. Company Law. Vol Core text series. 7th ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.
15.
Davies, P. L., Worthington, Sarah, Gower, L. C. B. Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law. 9th ed. Sweet & Maxwell; 2012.
16.
Hannigan, Brenda. Company Law. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.
17.
Parkinson, J. E. Corporate Power and Responsibility: Issues in the Theory of Company Law. Clarendon; 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198259893.001.0001
18.
Cheffins, Brian R. Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation. Clarendon Press; 1996.
19.
Ferran, Eilís. *Principles of Corporate Finance Law. Oxford University Press; 2008.
20.
Kraakman, Reinier H. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2009.
21.
McGee, Andrew. Share Capital. Tottel; 2007.
22.
Department of Trade & Industry. Modern company law for a competitive economy: completing the structure. Published online 2000. http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/16915560?style=html&title=Modern%20company%20law%20for%20a%20competitive%20economycompleting
23.
Department of Trade & Industry. Modernising Company Law, White Paper (URN 02/1088). Vol Cm. TSO; 2002.
24.
Great Britain. Company Law Reform. Vol Cm. Stationery Office; 2005.
25.
Ferran, Eilis. Company Law Reform in the UK: A Progress Report.; 2005. http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/32099948?style=html&title=Company%20Law%20Reform%20in%20the%20UK%3A%20A%20Progress%20Report.
26.
Court of Appeal. Colonial Bank v Whinney: 30 Ch. D 261.(1885). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I8BE30760E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
27.
Chancery Division. Borland’s Bank v Steel Brothers & Co. Ltd: 1 Ch 279 at 288.; 1901. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I76C06A30E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
28.
*Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd: AC 22. 1897. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YHW0-TWW4-21F8&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
29.
Short v Treasury Commissioners 1 KB 116. 1948. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T18552647146&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T18552647154&backKey=20_T18552647155&csi=296982&docNo=4&scrollToPosition=798
30.
Fidelis Oditah. Takeovers, share exchanges and the meaning of loss. Law Quarterly Review. 1996;112(Jul):424-445. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=ICCE8D940E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
31.
H.W. Higginson. Takeovers, share exchanges and the meaning of loss. Law Quarterly Review. 1997;113(Jan):51-53. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=ICCDEC720E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
32.
Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd 2 BCLC 773. 2001. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T18553034885&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T18553034887&backKey=20_T18553034888&csi=280378&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=456
33.
Ross Grantham. *The Doctrinal Basis of the Rights of Company Shareholders. The Cambridge Law Journal. 1998;57(3):554-588. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4508493
34.
*Gambotto v WCP Ltd HCA 12, 182 CLR 432 at 447. 1995. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-FHS0-TWW4-21NH&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
35.
House of Lords. Birch v Cropper 14 App Cas 525.(1889). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I74AD8FC0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
36.
UK Government. Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
37.
Murray A. Pickering. The Problem of the Preference Share. The Modern Law Review. 1963;26(5):499-519. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1092526
38.
House of Lords. *Birch v Cropper 14 App Cas 525.(1889). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I74AD8FC0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
39.
Court of Chancery. Webb v Earle L.R. 20 Eq 556.; 1875. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF73129B0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
40.
Chancery Division. *Evling v Israel & Oppenheimer 1 Ch 101.(1918). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IA2B59E80E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
41.
Court of Appeal. Re Wakley 2 Ch 205.; 1920. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IEF44CFE0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
42.
Re Crichtons Oil 2 Ch 86. 1902. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXW-1T00-TWW4-219T&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
43.
Chancery Division. Re Roberts & Cooper Ltd 2 Ch 383.(1929). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I88D73180E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
44.
Chancery Division. Re Wharfedale Brewery Ltd Ch 913.; 1952. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF8B18820E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
45.
Chancery Division. Dimbula Valley (Ceylon) Tea Co Ltd v Laurie.(1961). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I991F8C50E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
46.
House of Lords. *House of Fraser v ACGE BCLC 478.(1987). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IC3D87010E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
47.
UK Government. Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
48.
Court of Appeal. White v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd Ch 65, 2 WLR 144.; 1953. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF8EC9550E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
49.
*Re Northern Engineering Industries plc 2 BCLC 704. 1994. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV60-TWW8-0097&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
50.
UK Government. Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
51.
Centros Ltd v Erhervs-og Selskabsstyrelsen (C212/97) Ch 446. 2000. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-6CY0-TXD6-Y1N6&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
52.
High Level Group of Company Law Experts. A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/search_en.htm?hl=en&as_sitesearch=ec.europa.eu%2Finternal_market%2F&cx=010624300341678344703%3A_u-3r0niuzu&cof=FORID%3A9&q=A+Modern+Regulatory+Framework+for+Company+Law+in+Europe&sa.x=0&sa.y=0
53.
Rickford J. *Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 2004;15(4):919-1027. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29
54.
Armour J. *Legal Capital: an Outdated Concept? European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR). 2006;7(01). doi:10.1017/S156675290600005X
55.
Rickford J. Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 2004;15(4):919-1027. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29
56.
Grantham R, Rickett CEF. Corporate personality, limited liability and the protection of creditors. In: Corporate Personality in the 20th Century. Hart Publishing; 1998.
57.
Enriques L, Macey JR. *Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the European legal capital rules. Cornell law review. 86(6):1165-1166. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/api/version1/sr?date=2001&sr=Creditors+versus+capital+formation%3A+The+case+against+the+European+legal+capital+rules&csi=7333&secondRedirectIndicator=true
58.
Armour J. Legal Capital: an Outdated Concept? European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR). 2006;7(01). doi:10.1017/S156675290600005X
59.
Gedge, Montagu L., Great Britain. Report of the Committee on Shares of No Par Value. Vol Command papers. H.M.S.O.; 1954.
60.
UK Government. *Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
61.
House of Lords. *Ooregum Gold Mining Co v Roper AC 125.(1892). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I1438EA30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
62.
UK Government. Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
63.
*Mosely v Koffyfontein Mines Ltd 2 Ch 108. 1904. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JWD-4KM0-TXD6-Y05T&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
64.
UK Government. *Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
65.
*Re Wragge Ltd 1 Ch 796, 836. 1897. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJ60-TWW4-202W&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
66.
*Re Bradford Investments plc (No 2) BCC 379. 1991. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00FF&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
67.
Gedge, Montagu L., Great Britain. Report of the Committee on Shares of No Par Value. Vol Command papers. H.M.S.O.; 1954.
68.
Great Britain. Report of the Company Law Committee. Vol Cmnd 1749. HMSO; 1962.
69.
House of Lords. Ooregum Gold Mining Co v Roper AC 125.(1892). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I1438EA30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
70.
Department of Trade & Industry. Modern company law for a competitive economy: completing the structure (URN 00/1335), Final Report (URN 01/942).
71.
Department of Trade & Industry. Modernising Company Law, Cm 5553-I (URN 02/1088). Vol Cm 5553-I. TSO; 2002.
72.
Department of Trade & Industry. Company Law Reform (URN 05/928). Vol Cm 6456. Stationery Office; 2005.
73.
Rickford J. *Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 2004;15(4):919-1027. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29
74.
Gedge, Montagu L., Great Britain. Report of the Committee on Shares of No Par Value. Vol Command papers. H.M.S.O.; 1954.
75.
Department of Trade & Industry. Modernising Company Law, White Paper (URN 02/1088). Vol Cm 5553-I. TSO; 2002.
76.
Department of Trade & Industry. Company Law Reform (URN 05/928). Vol Cm. Stationery Office; 2005.
77.
Rickford J. Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 2004;15(4):919-1027. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29
78.
UK Government. *Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
79.
Mutual Life Insurance of New York v Rank Organisation BCLC 11. 1985. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00CD&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
80.
Chancery Division. Clemens v Clemens Bros Ltd 2 All ER 268.(1976). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I564AA3B0E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
81.
Privy Council (Australia). Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Ltd AC 821.(1974). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IC4043B00E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
82.
UK Government. Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
83.
UK Government. Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
84.
Court of Appeal. White v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd Ch 65, 2 WLR 144.; 1953. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF8EC9550E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
85.
House of Lords. *Hilder v Dexter AC 474.(1902). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IC04166A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
86.
Chancery Division. *Shearer v Bercain Ltd 3 All ER 295.(1980). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I9F5B5220E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
87.
UK Government. *Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
88.
*Re Joseph Holt plc 2 BCLC 604. 2001. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-016F&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
89.
Ferran E. Legal Capital and the Pressure of the Securities Markets. In: Capital Markets and Company Law. Oxford University Press; 2003.
90.
Hopt, Klaus J., Wymeersch, E. Capital Markets and Company Law. Oxford University Press; 2003.
91.
Mayer C, Franks J. Governance as a source of managerial discipline. 2002. http://www.nbb.be/pub/06_00_00_00_00/06_03_00_00_00/06_03_05_00_00.htm?l=en
92.
UK Government. *Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
93.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Precision Dippings Ltd v Precision Dippings Marketing Ltd Ch 447.(1986). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I2877B711E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
94.
Re Cleveland Trust plc BCLC 424. 1991. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV60-TWW8-00BG&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
95.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Bairstow v Queens Moat Houses Plc 2 BCLC 531.(2001). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I6DCFBFC0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
96.
Jennifer Payne. Unjust enrichment, trusts and recipient liability for unlawful dividends. Law Quarterly Review. 2003;119(Oct):583-607. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7E6DC5C1E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
97.
Enriques L, Macey JR. *Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the European legal capital rules. Cornell law review. 86(6):1165-1166. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/api/version1/sr?date=2001&sr=Creditors+versus+capital+formation%3A+The+case+against+the+European+legal+capital+rules&csi=7333&secondRedirectIndicator=true
98.
Associated British Engineering Ltd v IRC 1 KB 15. 1941. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXP-6730-TWW4-20KD&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
99.
Chancery Division. Topham v Charles Topham Gp Ltd 1 BCLC 123.; 2003. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=ID6AB3460E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
100.
Chancery Division. EIC Services v Phipps 3 All ER 804.(2003). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IA03DE7C0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
101.
Capital Maintenance: Other Issues: A Consultation Document from the Company Law Review Steering Group (URN 00/880). DTI; 2000.
102.
Department of Trade & Industry. Company Law Reform (URN 05/928). Vol Cm 6456. Stationery Office; 2005.
103.
Rickford J. *Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 2004;15(4):919-1027. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=5&values=Journals%7E%7EEuropean Business Law Review%7EVolume 15 %282004%29
104.
Tham, Chee Ho. Unjust enrichment and unlawful dividends: a step too far? The Cambridge law journal. 2005;64(1):177-211. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25166349
105.
Enriques L, Macey JR. Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the European legal capital rules. Cornell law review. 86(6):1165-1166. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/api/version1/sr?date=2001&sr=Creditors+versus+capital+formation%3A+The+case+against+the+European+legal+capital+rules&csi=7333&secondRedirectIndicator=true
106.
*Trevor v Whitworth 12 App Cas 409. 1887. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YK10-TWW4-2108&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
107.
Barclays Bank plc v British & Commonwealth Holdings plc BCC 19 (affirmed [1995] BCC 1059). 1995. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXN-S790-TWW4-20B3&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
108.
UK Government. *Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
109.
Chancery Division. Acatos & Hutcheson v Watson 1 BCLC 218.(1994). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I315BD600E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
110.
Re R W Peak Ltd BCC 596. 1998. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-J4J0-TWW4-21BT&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
111.
Geoffrey Morse. The introduction of treasury shares into English law and practice. Journal of business law. 2004;(May):303-331. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I7E5D23F0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
112.
UK Government. *Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
113.
Re Jupiter House Investments Ltd BCLC 222. 1985. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00FH&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
114.
Re Grosvenor Press plc BCLC 286. 1985. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00PP&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
115.
*Re Chatterley-Whitfield Collieries Ltd 2 All ER 593. 1948. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CRN-PP70-TWP1-60B1&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
116.
Re Saltdean Estate Co Ltd 3 All ER 829. 1968. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-35T0-TWP1-613K&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
117.
Re Northern Engineering Industries plc 2 BCLC 704. 1994. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV60-TWW8-0097&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
118.
CLR, Company Formation and Capital Maintenance URN 99/1145. 1999. http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file23277.pdf
119.
Department of Trade & Industry. Company Law Reform. Vol Cm. Stationery Office; 2005.
120.
Ferran, Eilís. *Principles of Corporate Finance Law. Oxford University Press; 2008.
121.
UK Government. *Companies Act 2006. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
122.
Eilís Ferran. *Corporate Transactions and Financial Assistance: Shifting Policy Perceptions but Static Law. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2004;63(1):225-243. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4509081
123.
Ferran E. Regulation of Private Equity - Backed Leveraged Buyout Activity in Europe. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2007. doi:10.2139/ssrn.989748
124.
Hans C. Hirt. The scope of prohibited financial assistance after MT Realisations Ltd (in liquidation) v Digital Equipment Co Ltd. Company Lawyer. 2004;25(1):9-19. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I7E5DE740E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
125.
*Brady v Brady AC 755. 1989. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXT-SRW0-TWW4-2172&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
126.
Barclays Bank v British & Commonwealth Holdings plc BCC 1059. 1995. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXN-S790-TWW4-20B3&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
127.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). MT Realisations v Digital Equipment Co Ltd 2 BCLC 688 (Ch D); 2 BCLC 117 (CA).(2003). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I065A31D0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
128.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Chaston v SWP Group Plc 1 BCLC 675.(2003). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I863B9480E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
129.
Re Hill & Tyler Ltd EWHC 1261. 2004. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P0BR&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
130.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Dyment v Boyden 1 WLR 792.(2004). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I9C8FFAF0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
131.
CLR, Company Formation and Capital Maintenance URN 99/1145. 1999. http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file23277.pdf
132.
CLR, Developing the Framework, URN 00/656. 2000. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121029131934/http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/businesslaw/co-act-2006/clr-review/page25086.html
133.
High Level Group of Company Law Experts. A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/search_en.htm?hl=en&as_sitesearch=ec.europa.eu%2Finternal_market%2F&cx=010624300341678344703%3A_u-3r0niuzu&cof=FORID%3A9&q=A+Modern+Regulatory+Framework+for+Company+Law+in+Europe&sa.x=0&sa.y=0
134.
Department of Trade & Industry. Company Law Reform. Vol Cm. Stationery Office; 2005.
135.
Eilís Ferran. Corporate Transactions and Financial Assistance: Shifting Policy Perceptions but Static Law. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2004;63(1):225-243. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4509081
