1.
Justis: the online legal library of UK, EU and Irish law, http://www.justis.com/.
2.
LexisNexis: Business Solutions & Software for Legal, Education and Government, http://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/home.page.
3.
High Court of Australia, http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/.
4.
UK Statute law database, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/.
5.
Ferran, Eilís: Principles of corporate finance law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
6.
Davies, P. L.: Introduction to company law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
7.
Kraakman, Reinier H.: The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
8.
Ferran, Eilís: Principles of corporate finance law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
9.
Lowry, John P., Reisberg, Arad, Pettet, B. G.: Pettet’s company law: company law and corporate finance. Pearson, Harlow (2012).
10.
Prentice, Daniel D., Reisberg, Arad: Corporate finance law in the UK and EU. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
11.
Gullifer, Louise, Payne, Jennifer: Corporate finance law: principles and policy. Hart, Oxford (2011).
12.
French, Derek.: Blackstone’s statutes on company law, 2012-2013. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
13.
Lowry, John P., Reisberg, Arad, Pettet, B. G.: Pettet’s company law: company law and corporate finance. Pearson, Harlow (2012).
14.
Dignam, Alan J., Lowry, John P.: Company law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
15.
Davies, P. L., Worthington, Sarah, Gower, L. C. B.: Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2012).
16.
Hannigan, Brenda: Company law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
17.
Parkinson, J. E.: Corporate power and responsibility: issues in the theory of company law. Clarendon, Oxford (1993).
18.
Cheffins, Brian R.: Company law: theory, structure, and operation. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1996).
19.
Ferran, Eilís: *Principles of corporate finance law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
20.
Kraakman, Reinier H.: The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
21.
McGee, Andrew: Share capital. Tottel, Haywards Heath (2007).
22.
Department of Trade & Industry: Modern company law for a competitive economy: completing the structure. (2000).
23.
Department of Trade & Industry: Modernising company law, White paper (URN 02/1088). TSO, Norwich (2002).
24.
Great Britain: Company law reform. Stationery Office, London (2005).
25.
Ferran, Eilis.: Company Law Reform in the UK: A Progress Report. (2005).
26.
Court of Appeal: Colonial bank v Whinney: 30 Ch. D 261. (1885).
27.
Chancery Division: Borland’s Bank v Steel Brothers & Co. Ltd: 1 Ch 279 at 288. (1901).
28.
*Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd: AC 22, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YHW0-TWW4-21F8&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
29.
Short v Treasury Commissioners 1 KB 116, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T18552647146&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T18552647154&backKey=20_T18552647155&csi=296982&docNo=4&scrollToPosition=798.
30.
Fidelis Oditah: Takeovers, share exchanges and the meaning of loss. Law Quarterly Review. 112, 424–445 (1996).
31.
H.W. Higginson: Takeovers, share exchanges and the meaning of loss. Law Quarterly Review. 113, 51–53 (1997).
32.
Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd 2 BCLC 773, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T18553034885&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T18553034887&backKey=20_T18553034888&csi=280378&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=456.
33.
Ross Grantham: *The Doctrinal Basis of the Rights of Company Shareholders. The Cambridge Law Journal. 57, 554–588 (1998).
34.
*Gambotto v WCP Ltd HCA 12, 182 CLR 432 at 447, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-FHS0-TWW4-21NH&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
35.
House of Lords: Birch v Cropper 14 App Cas 525. (1889).
36.
UK Government: Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
37.
Murray A. Pickering: The Problem of the Preference Share. The Modern Law Review. 26, 499–519 (1963).
38.
House of Lords: *Birch v Cropper 14 App Cas 525. (1889).
39.
Court of Chancery: Webb v Earle L.R. 20 Eq 556. (1875).
40.
Chancery Division: *Evling v Israel & Oppenheimer 1 Ch 101. (1918).
41.
Court of Appeal: Re Wakley 2 Ch 205. (1920).
42.
Re Crichtons Oil 2 Ch 86, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXW-1T00-TWW4-219T&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
43.
Chancery Division: Re Roberts & Cooper Ltd 2 Ch 383. (1929).
44.
Chancery Division: Re Wharfedale Brewery Ltd Ch 913. (1952).
45.
Chancery Division: Dimbula Valley (Ceylon) Tea Co Ltd v Laurie. (1961).
46.
House of Lords: *House of Fraser v ACGE BCLC 478. (1987).
47.
UK Government: Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
48.
Court of Appeal: White v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd Ch 65, 2 WLR 144. (1953).
49.
*Re Northern Engineering Industries plc 2 BCLC 704, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV60-TWW8-0097&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
50.
UK Government: Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
51.
Centros Ltd v Erhervs-og Selskabsstyrelsen (C212/97) Ch 446, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-6CY0-TXD6-Y1N6&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
52.
High Level Group of Company Law Experts: A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/search_en.htm?hl=en&as_sitesearch=ec.europa.eu%2Finternal_market%2F&cx=010624300341678344703%3A_u-3r0niuzu&cof=FORID%3A9&q=A+Modern+Regulatory+Framework+for+Company+Law+in+Europe&sa.x=0&sa.y=0.
53.
Rickford, J.: *Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 15, 919–1027 (2004).
54.
Armour, J.: *Legal Capital: an Outdated Concept? European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR). 7, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S156675290600005X.
55.
Rickford, J.: Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 15, 919–1027 (2004).
56.
Grantham, R., Rickett, C.E.F.: Corporate personality, limited liability and the protection of creditors. In: Corporate personality in the 20th century. Hart Publishing, Oxford (1998).
57.
Enriques, L., Macey, J.R.: *Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the European legal capital rules. Cornell law review. 86, 1165–1166.
58.
Armour, J.: Legal Capital: an Outdated Concept? European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR). 7, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S156675290600005X.
59.
Gedge, Montagu L., Great Britain: Report of the Committee on Shares of No Par Value. H.M.S.O., London (1954).
60.
UK Government: *Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
61.
House of Lords: *Ooregum Gold Mining Co v Roper AC 125. (1892).
62.
UK Government: Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
63.
*Mosely v Koffyfontein Mines Ltd 2 Ch 108, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JWD-4KM0-TXD6-Y05T&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
64.
UK Government: *Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
65.
*Re Wragge Ltd 1 Ch 796, 836, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJ60-TWW4-202W&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
66.
*Re Bradford Investments plc (No 2) BCC 379, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00FF&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
67.
Gedge, Montagu L., Great Britain: Report of the Committee on Shares of No Par Value. H.M.S.O., London (1954).
68.
Great Britain: Report of the Company Law Committee. HMSO, London (1962).
69.
House of Lords: Ooregum Gold Mining Co v Roper AC 125. (1892).
70.
Department of Trade & Industry: Modern company law for a competitive economy: completing the structure (URN 00/1335), Final Report (URN 01/942).
71.
Department of Trade & Industry: Modernising company law, Cm 5553-I (URN 02/1088). TSO, Norwich (2002).
72.
Department of Trade & Industry: Company law reform (URN 05/928). Stationery Office, London (2005).
73.
Rickford, J.: *Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 15, 919–1027 (2004).
74.
Gedge, Montagu L., Great Britain: Report of the Committee on Shares of No Par Value. H.M.S.O., London (1954).
75.
Department of Trade & Industry: Modernising company law, White paper (URN 02/1088). TSO, Norwich (2002).
76.
Department of Trade & Industry: Company law reform (URN 05/928). Stationery Office, London (2005).
77.
Rickford, J.: Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 15, 919–1027 (2004).
78.
UK Government: *Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
79.
Mutual Life Insurance of New York v Rank Organisation BCLC 11, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00CD&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
80.
Chancery Division: Clemens v Clemens Bros Ltd 2 All ER 268. (1976).
81.
Privy Council (Australia): Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Ltd AC 821. (1974).
82.
UK Government: Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
83.
UK Government: Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
84.
Court of Appeal: White v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd Ch 65, 2 WLR 144. (1953).
85.
House of Lords: *Hilder v Dexter AC 474. (1902).
86.
Chancery Division: *Shearer v Bercain Ltd 3 All ER 295. (1980).
87.
UK Government: *Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
88.
*Re Joseph Holt plc 2 BCLC 604, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-016F&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
89.
Ferran, E.: Legal Capital and the Pressure of the Securities Markets. In: Capital markets and company law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).
90.
Hopt, Klaus J., Wymeersch, E.: Capital markets and company law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).
91.
Mayer, C., Franks, J.: Governance as a source of managerial discipline, http://www.nbb.be/pub/06_00_00_00_00/06_03_00_00_00/06_03_05_00_00.htm?l=en.
92.
UK Government: *Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
93.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division): Precision Dippings Ltd v Precision Dippings Marketing Ltd Ch 447. (1986).
94.
Re Cleveland Trust plc BCLC 424, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV60-TWW8-00BG&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
95.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division): Bairstow v Queens Moat Houses plc 2 BCLC 531. (2001).
96.
Jennifer Payne: Unjust enrichment, trusts and recipient liability for unlawful dividends. Law Quarterly Review. 119, 583–607 (2003).
97.
Enriques, L., Macey, J.R.: *Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the European legal capital rules. Cornell law review. 86, 1165–1166.
98.
Associated British Engineering Ltd v IRC 1 KB 15, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXP-6730-TWW4-20KD&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
99.
Chancery Division: Topham v Charles Topham Gp Ltd 1 BCLC 123. (2003).
100.
Chancery Division: EIC Services v Phipps 3 All ER 804. (2003).
101.
Capital maintenance: other issues: a consultation document from the Company Law Review Steering Group (URN 00/880). DTI, London (2000).
102.
Department of Trade & Industry: Company law reform (URN 05/928). Stationery Office, London (2005).
103.
Rickford, J.: *Reforming Capital. European Business Law Review. 15, 919–1027 (2004).
104.
Tham, Chee Ho: Unjust enrichment and unlawful dividends: a step too far? The Cambridge law journal. 64, 177–211 (2005).
105.
Enriques, L., Macey, J.R.: Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the European legal capital rules. Cornell law review. 86, 1165–1166.
106.
*Trevor v Whitworth 12 App Cas 409, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YK10-TWW4-2108&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
107.
Barclays Bank plc v British & Commonwealth Holdings plc BCC 19 (affirmed [1995] BCC 1059), http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXN-S790-TWW4-20B3&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
108.
UK Government: *Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
109.
Chancery Division: Acatos & Hutcheson v Watson 1 BCLC 218. (1994).
110.
Re R W Peak Ltd BCC 596, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-J4J0-TWW4-21BT&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
111.
Geoffrey Morse.: The introduction of treasury shares into English law and practice. Journal of business law. 303–331 (2004).
112.
UK Government: *Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
113.
Re Jupiter House Investments Ltd BCLC 222, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00FH&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
114.
Re Grosvenor Press plc BCLC 286, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV50-TWW8-00PP&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
115.
*Re Chatterley-Whitfield Collieries Ltd 2 All ER 593, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CRN-PP70-TWP1-60B1&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
116.
Re Saltdean Estate Co Ltd 3 All ER 829, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-35T0-TWP1-613K&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
117.
Re Northern Engineering Industries plc 2 BCLC 704, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FWK-NV60-TWW8-0097&csi=280378&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
118.
CLR, Company Formation and Capital Maintenance URN 99/1145, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file23277.pdf.
119.
Department of Trade & Industry: Company law reform. Stationery Office, London (2005).
120.
Ferran, Eilís: *Principles of corporate finance law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
121.
UK Government: *Companies Act 2006, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
122.
Eilís Ferran: *Corporate Transactions and Financial Assistance: Shifting Policy Perceptions but Static Law. The Cambridge Law Journal. 63, 225–243 (2004).
123.
Ferran, E.: Regulation of Private Equity - Backed Leveraged Buyout Activity in Europe. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2007). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.989748.
124.
Hans C. Hirt.: The scope of prohibited financial assistance after MT Realisations Ltd (in liquidation) v Digital Equipment Co Ltd. Company Lawyer. 25, 9–19 (2004).
125.
*Brady v Brady AC 755, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXT-SRW0-TWW4-2172&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
126.
Barclays Bank v British & Commonwealth Holdings plc BCC 1059, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXN-S790-TWW4-20B3&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
127.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division): MT Realisations v Digital Equipment Co Ltd 2 BCLC 688 (Ch D); 2 BCLC 117 (CA). (2003).
128.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division): *Chaston v SWP Group plc 1 BCLC 675. (2003).
129.
Re Hill & Tyler Ltd EWHC 1261, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P0BR&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
130.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division): *Dyment v Boyden 1 WLR 792. (2004).
131.
CLR, Company Formation and Capital Maintenance URN 99/1145, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file23277.pdf.
132.
CLR, Developing the Framework, URN 00/656, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121029131934/http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/businesslaw/co-act-2006/clr-review/page25086.html.
133.
High Level Group of Company Law Experts: A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/search_en.htm?hl=en&as_sitesearch=ec.europa.eu%2Finternal_market%2F&cx=010624300341678344703%3A_u-3r0niuzu&cof=FORID%3A9&q=A+Modern+Regulatory+Framework+for+Company+Law+in+Europe&sa.x=0&sa.y=0.
134.
Department of Trade & Industry: Company law reform. Stationery Office, London (2005).
135.
Eilís Ferran: Corporate Transactions and Financial Assistance: Shifting Policy Perceptions but Static Law. The Cambridge Law Journal. 63, 225–243 (2004).
