1
Roberts S. Order and dispute: an introduction to legal anthropology. Harmondsworth, Middx: : Penguin 1979.
2
Malinowski B. Crime and custom in savage society. London: : Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner 1926.
3
Goodale M. Human rights: an anthropological reader. Malden, MA: : Wiley-Blackwell 2009.
4
Nader L, Koch KF, Cox B. The Ethnography of Law: A Bibliographical Survey. Current Anthropology 1966;7:267–94. doi:10.1086/200718
5
Kahn PW. The cultural study of law: reconstructing legal scholarship. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 1999.
6
Malinowski B. Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1970 [1926]. Preface, Introduction, Chapters I-IV. In: Crime and custom in savage society. London: : Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner 1926.
7
Llewellyn KN, Hoebel EA. Llewellyn, Karl & Edward Hoebel. 1973 [1941]. Preface & Chapter 2: A Theory of Investigation. In: The Cheyenne way: conflict and case law in primitive jurisprudence. Norman, Okla: : University of Oklahoma Press 1973.
8
Comaroff, John ; Roberts, Simon. Comaroff, John L. & Simon Roberts. 1986. Pgs. 3-21 of Introduction. Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. In: Rules and processes. The cultural logic of dispute in an African context.
9
Conley, J.; O’Barr, W. Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the Ethnographic Study of Law. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 1994;27:41–64.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lla27&id=77
10
Moore SF. Certainties undone: fifty turbulent years of legal anthropology, 1949-1999. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2001;7:95–116. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00052
11
Hobbes, Thomas. [1651] Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil. https://web.archive.org/web/20030218000757/http://oregonstate.edu:80/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html
12
Roberts S. Roberts, Simon. 2013. Chapter Two: Why Not Law? In: Order and dispute: an introduction to legal anthropology. Harmondsworth, Middx: : Penguin 1979.
13
Locke, John. 1689. Two Treatises of Government (particularly Book II, ‘An Essay Concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government’). In: John Locke: Two Treatises of Government (1680-1690).http://lonang.com/library/reference/locke-two-treatises-government
14
Maine, Henry Sumner. 1908 [1863]. Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and its Relation to Modern Ideas. https://archive.org/details/ancientlaw030840mbp
15
Fortes M, Evans-Pritchard EE, International African Institute. Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 2015 [1940]. The Nuer of Southern Sudan. In: African political systems. London: : KPI in association with the International African Institute 1987.
16
Laura Nader. Gluckman, Max. 1997 [1969]. Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law. In: Law in culture and society / edited by Laura Nader.
17
Laura Nader. Bohannan, Paul. 1997 [1969]. Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology. In: Law in culture and society / edited by Laura Nader.
18
Durkheim E. Emile Durkheim: Selected Writings. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628085
19
Kahn, P. Freedom, Autonomy, and the Cultural Study of Law. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 2001;13:141–74.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/yallh13&id=147
20
Bohannan, Paul Bohannan, Paul (correspondence author). Justice and judgment among the Tiv. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest59009217&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest59009217&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&pcAvailabiltyMode=true&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=UCL_VU1&mode=Basic&tab=local&srt=rank&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=oBohannan%2C%20Paul.%201957.%20Justice%20and%20Judgment%20among%20the%20Tiv.%20Oxford%3A%20Oxford%20University%20Press.%20&dstmp=1471615867265
21
Max Gluckman, 1911-1975 University of Zambia. Institute for Social Research. The judicial process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia / by Max Gluckman. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_LMS_DS000306451&indx=1&recIds=UCL_LMS_DS000306451&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbrSourceidDisplay=UCL_LMS_DS&frbrIssnDisplay=&dscnt=1&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&lastPag=&rfnGrp=frbr&tab=local&frbrJtitleDisplay=&dstmp=1471615905092&frbg=505343056&lastPagIndx=1&frbrSrt=date&frbrEissnDisplay=&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&cs=frb&fctV=505343056&srt=rank&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=The%20Judicial%20Process%20among%20the%20Barotse%20of%20Northern%20Rhodesia%20%28Zambia%29
22
Comaroff, John ; Roberts, Simon. Rules and processes. The cultural logic of dispute in an African context. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest36837372&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest36837372&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&frbg=&rfnGrpCounter=1&pcAvailabiltyMode=true&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=UCL_VU1&fctV=books&mode=Basic&rfnGrp=1&tab=local&srt=rank&fctN=facet_rtype&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Rules%20and%20Processes%3A%20The%20Cultural%20Logic%20of%20Dispute%20in%20an%20African%20Context&dstmp=1471615955547
23
Roberts, S. Introduction - Some Notes on African Customary Law. Journal of African Law 1984;:1–5.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jaflaw28&id=5
24
Chanock M. Nec-Traditionalism and the Customary Law in Malawi. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 1978;10:80–91. doi:10.1080/07329113.1978.10756245
25
Mamdani M, Mahmood Mamdani. Making Sense of Political Violence in Postcolonial Africa. Socialist Register 2009;39.http://www.socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5796#.V7cVUiEhHMg
26
McFate, Montgomery. The military utility of understanding adversary culture. Joint Force Quarterly;:42–8.http://search.proquest.com/docview/59941818?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
27
Hobsbawm EJ, Ranger TO. Hobsbawm, Eric. 2003 [1983]. Introduction: Inventing Traditions. In: The invention of tradition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
28
Starr J, Collier JF. Cohn, Bernard. 1989. Law and the Colonial State in India. In: History and power in the study of law: new directions in legal anthropology. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1989.
29
Gonzalez, Roberto. American counterinsurgency: human science and the human terrain.
30
Spencer J. Nissan, Elizabeth & R. L. Stirrat. 1990. The Generation of Communal Identities. In: Sri Lanka: history and the roots of conflict. London: : Routledge 1990.
31
Hobsbawm EJ, Ranger TO. Ranger, Terrence O. 2003 [1983]. The Invention of Tradition in Colonial Africa. In: The invention of tradition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
32
Mamdani M. Mamdani, Mahmood. 1996. Chapter Four: Customary Law: The Theory of Decentralised Despotism. In: Citizen and subject: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Kampala: : Fountain 1996.
33
Snyder FG. Colonialism and Legal Form: The Creation of "Customary Law” in Senegal. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 1981;13:49–90. doi:10.1080/07329113.1981.10756258
34
Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Robert A. Yelle, Mateo Taussig-Rubbo. Engel, David. 2011. ‘The Spirits Were Always Watching’: Buddhism, Secular Law and Social Change in Thailand. In: After secular law. Stanford, California: : Stanford University Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=744003
35
Moore SF. Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study. Law & Society Review 1973;7. doi:10.2307/3052967
36
Roberts, Simon. 1998. Against Legal Pluralism: Some Reflections on the Contemporary Enlargement of the Legal Domain. Journal of Legal Pluralism 42: 95-106. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07329113.1998.10756517
37
Göle N, editor. Billaud, Julie. 2013. Ethics and Affects in British Sharia Courts: ‘A Simple Way of Getting to Paradise’. In: Islam and public controversy in Europe. Farnham, Surrey, UK: : Ashgate Publishing 2013. http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9781315589930
38
Sharia courts in Britain lock women into ‘marital captivity’, study says | Home News | News | The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sharia-courts-in-britain-lock-women-into-marital-captivity-study-says-a6761141.html
39
Archbishop backs sharia law for British Muslims | UK news | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/feb/07/religion.world
40
How do you solve a problem like Sharia? The real issues raised by the Sharia law debate | Religion and the Public Sphere. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/religionpublicsphere/2016/08/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-sharia-the-real-issues-raised-by-the-sharia-law-debate/
41
Griffiths J. What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 1986;18:1–55. doi:10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
42
Pospisil, Leopold. Legal Levels and Multiplicity of Legal Systems in Human Societies. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=7&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_jstor_archive172928&indx=1&recIds=TN_jstor_archive172928&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=7&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=o%09Pospisil%2C%20Leonard.%201967.%20Legal%20Levels%20and%20Multiplicity%20of%20Legal%20Systems%20in%20Human%20Societies.%20Journal%20of%20Conflict%20Resolution%2011%281%29%3A%202-26.%20&dstmp=1471618812871
43
SOUSA SANTOS, BOAVENTURA DE. THE LAW OF THE OPPRESSED: THE CONSTRUCTION AND REPRODUCTION OF LEGALITY IN PASARGADA. Law and Society Review;12.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1297912019?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
44
Fuller C. Legal Anthropology,: Legal Pluralism and Legal Thought. Anthropology Today 1994;10. doi:10.2307/2783478
45
Roberts S. After Government? On Representing Law Without the State. Modern Law Review 2005;68:1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00526.x
46
Harris O, European Association of Social Anthropologists. Sanadjian, Manuchehr. 2005. A Public Flogging in South-Western Iran: Juridical Rule, Abolition of Legality and Local Resistance. In: Inside and outside the law: anthropological studies of authority and ambiguity. London: : Routledge 1996.
47
McLagan M. Principles, Publicity, and Politics: Notes on Human Rights Media. American Anthropologist 2003;105:605–12. doi:10.1525/aa.2003.105.3.605
48
Cowan JK, Dembour M-B, Wilson RA, editors. Merry, Sally Engle. 2002. Changing Rights, Changing Culture. In: Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804687
49
Freeman M. The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 1994;16. doi:10.2307/762434
50
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
51
Tasioulas, John. Towards a Philosophy of Human Rights. Current Legal Problems 2012;65.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1553716766?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
52
American Anthropologist Association. Statement on Human Rights. Quaderns de l’Institut Català d’Antropologia Published Online First: 2003.http://www.raco.cat/index.php/QuadernsICA/article/view/95554
53
Nancy Scheper-Hughes. The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology. Current Anthropology 1995;36:409–40.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744051
54
Wilson R. Stoll, David. 1997. To Whom Should We Listen? Human Rights Activism in Two Guatemalan Land Disputes. In: Human rights, culture and context: anthropological perspectives. London: : Pluto Press 1997.
55
Niezen R. Niezen, Ronald. 2010. Chapter Two: The Power of Persons Unknown. In: Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779640
56
Gourevitch P. We wish to inform you that tomorrow we will be killed with our families: stories from Rwanda. London: : Picador 1998.
57
Michael Freeman. The Problem of Secularism in Human Rights Theory. Human Rights Quarterly 2004;26:375–400.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20069731?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
58
Abu-Lughod L. Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist 2002;104:783–90. doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.783
59
Asad T. Asad, Talal. 2003. Chapter Four: Redeeming the "Human” through Human Rights. In: Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 2003.
60
RILES A. Anthropology, Human Rights, and Legal Knowledge: Culture in the Iron Cage. American Anthropologist 2006;108:52–65. doi:10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.52
61
Scott D, Hirschkind C. Casanova, Jose. 2006. Secularisation Revisited: A Reply to Talal Asad. In: Powers of the secular modern: Talal Asad and his interlocutors. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 2006.
62
Harris O, European Association of Social Anthropologists. Dembour, Marie-Benedicte. 2005. Human Rights Talk and Anthropological Ambivalence: The Particular Context of Universal Claims. In: Inside and outside the law: anthropological studies of authority and ambiguity. London: : Routledge 1996.
63
Asad, T. On torture, or cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. Social Research;63:1081–109.http://search.proquest.com/docview/57757298?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
64
Engelke M. ‘We Wondered what Human Rights He Was Talking About’: Human rights, homosexuality and the Zimbabwe International Book Fair. Critique of Anthropology 1999;19:289–314. doi:10.1177/0308275X9901900305
65
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=10&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_dawson9781400840823&indx=1&recIds=TN_dawson9781400840823&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=10&frbg=&rfnGrpCounter=1&pcAvailabiltyMode=true&dscnt=2&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=UCL_VU1&fctV=books&mode=Basic&rfnGrp=1&tab=local&srt=rank&fctN=facet_rtype&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=The%20Impossibility%20of%20Religious%20Freedom&dstmp=1471626660475
66
Tarlo E. Tarlo, Emma. 2010. Chapter Five: Diversity Contested. In: Visibly Muslim: fashion, politics, faith. Oxford: : Berg 2010.
67
McIvor M. Carnal Exhibitions: Material Religion and the European Court of Human Rights. Ecclesiastical Law Journal 2015;17:3–14. doi:10.1017/S0956618X14000866
68
Comaroff JL. Reflections on the Rise of Legal Theology: Law and Religion in the Twenty-First Century. Social Analysis 2009;53. doi:10.3167/sa.2009.530112
69
Hurd, E.S. Beyond religious freedom: The new global politics of religion. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=4&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84940757768&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84940757768&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=4&frbg=&pcAvailabiltyMode=true&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=UCL_VU1&mode=Basic&tab=local&srt=rank&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Beyond%20Religious%20Freedom%3A%20The%20New%20Global%20Politics%20of%20Religion&dstmp=1471626862815
70
Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Robert A. Yelle, Mateo Taussig-Rubbo. Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers, Robert A. Yelle & Mateo Taussig-Rubbo. 2011. Introduction. In: After secular law. Stanford, California: : Stanford University Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=744003
71
Religion Out Loud: Religious Sound, Public Space, and American Pluralism (North American Religions Series). NYU Press 9AD. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Religion-Out-Loud-Religious-Pluralism/dp/081470820X
72
Weiner I. The Corporately Produced Conscience: Emergency Contraception and the Politics of Workplace Accommodations. Journal of the American Academy of Religion Published Online First: 11 July 2016. doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfw049
73
Peroni L. Deconstructing ‘Legal’ Religion in Strasbourg. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 2014;3:235–57. doi:10.1093/ojlr/rwt047
74
Sarah Barringer Gordon. The Mormon question. Chapel Hill, NC: : University of North Carolina Press 2002.
75
Carol J. Greenhouse. Praying for Justice. Cornell University Press
76
Clifford J. Chapter Twelve: Identity in Mashpee. In: The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, Mass. ; London: : Harvard University Press 1988. 227–346.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=39789f5d-6036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
77
Conklin BA. Body paint, feathers, and vcrs: aesthetics and authenticity in Amazonian activism. American Ethnologist 1997;24:711–37. doi:10.1525/ae.1997.24.4.711
78
Niezen R. Niezen, Ronald. 2010. Chapter Four: The Invention of Indigenous Peoples. In: Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779640
79
Povinelli EA. The Cunning of Recognition. Duke University Press 2002. doi:10.1215/9780822383673
80
Goodale M, Merry SE. Speed, Shannon. 2007. Exercising Rights and Reconfiguring Resistance in the Zapatista Juntas de Buen Gobiernao. In: The practice of human rights: tracking law between the global and the local. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
81
Kuper A. The Return of the Native. Current Anthropology 2003;44:389–402. doi:10.1086/368120
82
Gillis JR. Handler, Richard. 1994. Is ‘Identity’ a Useful Cross-Cultural Concept? In: Commemorations: the politics of national identity. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1994.
83
Greene S. Indigenous People Incorporated? Current Anthropology 2004;45:211–37. doi:10.1086/381047
84
Elizabeth A. Povinelli. The State of Shame: Australian Multiculturalism and the Crisis of Indigenous Citizenship. Critical Inquiry 1998;24:575–610.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1344180?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
85
Colin Firth & Survival International save the Awà people - survivalinternational.org awa. 16AD.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M_BofZ43yo
86
Hale CR. Activist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology. Cultural Anthropology 2006;21:96–120. doi:10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96
87
Nancy Scheper-Hughes. The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology. Current Anthropology 1995;36:409–40.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744051?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
88
Watters, Ethan. 2014. The Organ Detective: A Career Spent Uncovering a Hidden Global Market in Human Flesh. Pacific Standard. https://psmag.com/the-organ-detective-a-career-spent-uncovering-a-hidden-global-market-in-human-flesh-b10832c31ccd#.saecinbs3
89
Chari S, Donner H. Ethnographies of Activism: A Critical Introduction. Cultural Dynamics 2010;22:75–85. doi:10.1177/0921374010380887
90
Kirsch S. Anthropology and Advocacy: A Case Study of the Campaign against the Ok Tedi Mine. Critique of Anthropology 2002;22:175–200. doi:10.1177/03075X02022002851
91
Goodale M. Merry, Sally Engle. 2009. Legal Transplants and Cultural Translation: Making Human Rights in the Vernacular. In: Human rights: an anthropological reader. Malden, MA: : Wiley-Blackwell 2009.
92
Niezen R. Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779640
