[1]
Agamben, Giorgio 1998. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
[2]
Agrest, D. 1996. Architecture from without: body logic and sex. Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995. Princeton Architectural Press. 541–553.
[3]
Agrest, Diana et al. 1996. The sex of architecture. Harry N. Abrams.
[4]
Ahmed, S. 2006. Queer phenomenology: orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
[6]
Allen, B. The Technical.
[7]
Arie Graafland and Heidi Sohn 2012. Introduction: Science and virtuality. The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. SAGE. 467–483.
[8]
Attfield, Judy 2000. Wild things: the material culture of everyday life. Berg.
[9]
Aureli, P.V. and Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture 2008. The project of autonomy: politics and architecture within and against capitalism. Princeton Architectural.
[10]
B. Campkin and R. Cox 2007. The visible and invisible: (de|)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices. Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination. I.B. Tauris. 34–48.
[11]
Banham, P.R. 1982. Oases and resorts. Scenes in America deserta. Thames and Hudson. 21–44.
[12]
Banham, P.R. 1982. The eye of the beholder. Scenes in America deserta. Thames and Hudson. 209–228.
[13]
Barthes, R. Myth Today. Turk’s head review.
[14]
Bender, B. 2002. Landscape and politics. The material culture reader. Berg. 135–174.
[15]
Benjamin, W. 1999. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Illuminations. Pimlico. 211–235.
[16]
Bennett, Jane 2010. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
[17]
Bermann, K. 1998. The house behind. Places through the body. Routledge. 165–180.
[18]
Betsky, A. 1997. Queer space: architecture and same-sex desire. William Morrow & Co.
[19]
Bhabha, H.K. 2004. DissemiNation : time, narrative and the margins of the modern nation. The location of culture. Routledge. 199–244.
[20]
Bijsterveld, K. 2008. Infernal din, heavenly tunes : repertoires of dramatizing sound. Mechanical sound : technology, culture, and public problems of noise in the twentieth century. MIT Press. 27–51.
[21]
Blum, Virginia 1AD. Psychotopologies: closing the circuit between psychic and material space. Environment and Planning - Part D. 29, 6 (1AD), 1030–1047.
[22]
Bonnevier, K. 2007. Behind straight curtains: towards a queer feminist theory of architecture. Axl Books.
[23]
Bonta, J.P. 1979. From Written Dissemination to Text Analysis. Architecture and its interpretation: a study of expressive systems in architecture. Lund Humphries. 175–224.
[24]
Borden, I. and Rendell, J. 2000. From chamber to transformer: epistemological challenges in the methodology of theorised architectural history. The Journal of Architecture. 5, 2 (Jan. 2000), 215–228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/136023600408719.
[25]
Bourriaud, Nicolas 2009. A precarious existence: vulnerability in the public domain. NAi Publishers.
[26]
Braidotti, R. Posthuman Relational Subjectivity. Taylor & Francis eBooks - Relational Architectural Ecologies. 21–39.
[27]
Braidotti, R. 2006. Transpositions: on nomadic ethics. Polity.
[28]
Bressani, M. 2003. Viollet-le-Ducs’s optic. Architecture and the sciences : exchanging metaphors. Princeton University School of Architecture. 119–139.
[29]
Brown, L.A. 2011. Introduction. Feminist practices: interdisciplinary approaches to women in architecture. Ashgate. 1–15.
[30]
Brown, N. 2008. Immortality by Design. Parallax. 14, 3 (Jul. 2008), 4–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13534640802159096.
[31]
Buchli, V. 2002. Architecture and the domestic sphere. The material culture reader. Berg. 207–213.
[32]
Buchli, V. and Lucas, G. 2001. The archaeology of alienation : a late twentieth-century British council house. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. Routledge. 158–167.
[33]
Burgin, V. 1996. Geometry and abjection. In/different spaces : place and memory in visual culture. University of California Press. 38–56.
[34]
Burgin, V. 1992. Perverse Space. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press. 219–240.
[35]
Burgoyne, B. 2003. Autism and Topology. Drawing the soul: schemas and models in psychoanalysis. Karnac. 198–212.
[36]
Burns, K. 2010. Ex libris: Archaeologies of Feminism, Architecture and Deconstruction. Architectural Theory Review. 15, 3 (Dec. 2010), 242–265. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2010.524706.
[37]
Butler, J. 2006. Subjects of sex, gender, desire. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
[38]
Butler, Judith 2004. Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
[39]
Campbell, Timothy C. 2011. Improper life: technology and biopolitics from Heidegger to Agamben. University of Minnesota Press.
[40]
Campkin, B. 2007. Ornament from grime: David Adjaye’s Dirty House, the architectural ‘aesthetic of recycling’ and the Gritty Brits. The Journal of Architecture. 12, 4 (Sep. 2007), 367–392. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360701614649.
[41]
Campkin, B. 2013. Placing "Matter Out Of Place”: Purity and Danger as Evidence for Architecture and Urbanism. Architectural Theory Review. 18, 1 (Apr. 2013), 46–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2013.785579.
[42]
Campkin, B. and Hunt, J. Letters Home: Queer Domestic Politics Provoked by the Actions of Performance Artist Benjamin Sebastian. Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches. Bloomsbury Academic.
[43]
Campkin, B. and Penner, B. Beyond Home. Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches. Bloomsbury Academic.
[44]
Campkin, B. and Pilkey, B. Queering Home. Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches. Bloomsbury Aademic.
[45]
Carpo, M. 2001. Architectural drawing in the age of its mechanical reproduction : Serlio. Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory. MIT Press. 42–56.
[46]
Carpo, M. 2001. Prologue : architectural culture and technological context. Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory. MIT Press. 1–15.
[47]
Carr, E.H. 2001. Ch. 2: Society and the individual. What is history?. Palgrave. 25–49.
[48]
Castoriadis, C. The psyche and the society anew. Figures of the Thinkable. 353–377.
[49]
Celik, Z. 2000. Colonialism, Orientalism and the canon. Intersections : architectural histories and critical theories. Routledge. 161–169.
[50]
Çelik, Zeynep 1997. Urban forms and colonial confrontations: Algiers under French rule. University of California Press.
[51]
de Cetreau, M. 1986. Psychoanalysis and its History. Heterologies: discourse on the other. University of Minnesota Press. 3–16.
[52]
Chakrabarty, D. Chapter 1: Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. 27–46.
[53]
Clough, P. and Willse, C. 2011. Beyond Biopolitics: Essays on Governance of Life and Death.
[54]
Coleman, D. 1996. Introduction from ‘Architecture and feminism’. Architecture and feminism. Princeton Architectural Press. ix–xvi.
[55]
Colomina, B. 1996. Archive. Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media. MIT Press. 1–15.
[56]
Colomina, B. 1996. Interior. Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media. MIT Press. 232–281.
[57]
Colomina, B. 1992. The Split Wall: Domestic Voyeurism. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press. 73–128.
[58]
Colomina, B. and Bloomer, J. 1992. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press.
[59]
Colquhoun, A. 1981. Essays in architectural criticism: modern architecture and historical change. MIT Press.
[60]
Cousins, M. 1996. Where? Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. Black Dog Publishing. 107–114.
[61]
Crinson, M. 2003. Modern architecture and the end of empire. Ashgate.
[62]
‘Criticality’ and its discontents: http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/21/criticality-and-its-discontents.
[63]
Culler, J. 1994. Introduction: What’s the Point? The Point of theory: practices of cultural analysis. Amsterdam University Press.
[64]
Daniel Miller 2001. Behind closed doors. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Berg. 1–19.
[65]
Dorrian, M. 2005. Criticism, negation, action. The Journal of Architecture. 10, 3 (Jun. 2005), 229–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360500162477.
[66]
Douglas, M. 2002. Chapter 2 - Secular defilement. Purity and danger: an analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. Routledge. 36–50.
[67]
Durning, M.L. and Wrigley, R. 2000. Gender and architecture. Wiley.
[68]
E. Shove 1999. Constructing home: a crossroads of choice. At home: an anthropology of domestic space. Syracuse University Press. 130–143.
[69]
Eco, U. 1997. Function and sign : the semiotics of architecture. Rethinking architecture : a reader in cultural theory. Routledge. 182–202.
[70]
Eisenman, P. 2007. Autonomy and the Will to the Critical. Written into the void: selected writings, 1990-2004. (2007), 94–99.
[71]
Evans, R. 1997. Translations from drawing to building. Translations from drawing to building and other essays. Architectural Association. 153–194.
[72]
Fardon, R. 2013. Citations out of place, or, Lord Palmerston goes viral in the nineteenth century but gets lost in the twentieth. Anthropology Today. 29, 1 (Feb. 2013), 25–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12007.
[73]
Feenberg, A. 1999. Technology, philosophy, politics. Questioning technology. Routledge. 1–17.
[74]
Forty, A. 1986. Chapter 7 - Hygiene and Cleanliness. Objects of desire: design and society since 1750. Thames and Hudson. 156–181.
[75]
Forty, A. 2000. Design. Words and buildings: a vocabulary of modern architecture. Thames & Hudson. 136–141.
[76]
Foucault, M. 2007. Ch. 5: Lecture 8 February 1978 from Security, Territory, Population. Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Palgrave Macmillan. 115–130.
[77]
Foucault, M. 2007. Ch. 13: Lecture 5 April 1978 from Security, Territory, Population. Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Palgrave Macmillan. 333–358.
[78]
Foucault, M. et al. 1988. Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. Tavistock.
[79]
Foucault, M. and Senellart, M. 2008. Course Summary and context from The birth of biopolitics. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Palgrave Macmillan. 317–331.
[80]
Fraser, M. 2013. Introduction. Design research in architecture: an overview. Ashgate. 1–14.
[81]
Fraser, M. and Kerr, J. 2007. Architecture and the ‘special relationship’: the American influence on post-war British architecture. Routledge.
[82]
Freud, S. 1986. A Note on the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis. The essentials of psycho-analysis. Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 81–215.
[83]
Freud, S. 1986. Instincts and their Vicissitudes. The essentials of psycho-analysis. Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 197–217.
[84]
Galison, Peter, 1955-; Thompson, Emily Ann. 1999. The architecture of science. MIT Press.
[85]
Giedion, S. The Assembly Line and Scientific Management. Mechanization takes command: a contribution to anonymous history. 79–121.
[86]
Grosz, E.A. 1995. Space, time, and bodies. Space, time, and perversion : essays on the politics of bodies. Routledge. 83–87.
[87]
Guattari, F. 2007. La Borde: a clinic unlike any other. Chaosophy: Texts and interview 1972-1977. Semiotext(e). 176–194.
[88]
H. Heynen 2002. About histories and theory. The Journal of Architecture. 7, 2 (Jan. 2002), 205–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360210153656.
[89]
Haraway, D.J. 2004. The Haraway reader. Routledge.
[90]
Hauptmann, D. and Neidich, W. 2010. Introduction: Architecture and mind in the age of communication and information. Cognitive architecture: from biopolitics to noopolitics : architecture & mind in the age of communication and information. 010 Publishers. 10–43.
[91]
Hayden, Dolores 1981. The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. MIT Press.
[92]
Hayden White 1984. The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory. History and Theory. 23, 1 (1984), 1–33.
[93]
Hays, K.M. 2010. Architecture’s desire: reading the late avant-garde. MIT Press.
[94]
Heidegger, M. 1977. The question concerning technology. The question concerning technology, and other essays. Harper & Row. 3–35.
[95]
Hernández, F. 2010. Bhabha for architects. Routledge.
[96]
Hernández, F. 2002. The transcultural phenomenon, and the transculturation of architecture. The Journal of Romance Studies. 2, 3 (Jan. 2002), 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3828/jrs.2.3.1.
[97]
Heynen, H. 1999. Architecture as critique of modernity. Architecture and modernity: a critique. MIT. 148, 249–218,258.
[98]
Heynen, H. 1999. What belongs to architecture?’ Avant-garde ideas in the modern movement. The Journal of Architecture. 4, 2 (Jan. 1999), 129–147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/136023699373882.
[99]
Hill, J. 2013. Design research: the first 500 years. Design research in architecture: an overview. Ashgate. 15–34.
[100]
Holm, L. 2010. Introduction: Vision and its doubles. Brunelleschi, Lacan, Le Corbusier: architecture, space and the construction of subjectivity. Routledge. 1–18.
[101]
Holm, L. 2000. What Lacan said re: architecture. Critical Quarterly. 42, 2 (Jul. 2000), 29–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8705.00286.
[102]
Hughes, Francesca 1996. The architect: reconstructing her practice. MIT Press.
[103]
Jagose, A. 1996. Queer theory: an introduction. New York University Press.
[104]
Jameson, F. 1985. Architecture and the critique of ideology. Architecture, criticism, ideology. Princeton Architectural Press. 51–87.
[105]
Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism. Verso.
[106]
Jameson, F. The Brick and the Balloon: Architecture, Idealism and Land Speculation. New Left Review. 228, 25–46.
[107]
Judy Attfield 1994. The Tufted Carpet in Britain: Its Rise from the Bottom of the Pile, 1952-1970. Journal of Design History. 7, 3 (1994), 205–216.
[108]
Jyoti Hosagrahar 2012. ’Interrogating Difference: Postcolonial Perspectives in Architecture and Urbanism. The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. SAGE. 70–84.
[109]
K. Michael Hays 1984. Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form. Perspecta. 21, (1984), 14–29.
[110]
Kate Nesbitt 1995. The Sublime and Modern Architecture: Unmasking (An Aesthetic of) Abstraction. New Literary History. 26, 1 (1995), 95–110.
[111]
Katherine Schonfield 2001. Dirt is matter out of place. Architecture: the subject is matter. Routledge. 30–43.
[112]
King, A.D. 2003. Actually existing postcolonialisms : colonial urbanism and architecture after the postcolonial turn. Postcolonial urbanism : Southeast Asian cities and global processes. Routledge. 167–183.
[113]
King, A.D. 1984. Introduction. The bungalow : the production of a global culture. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1–13.
[114]
King, A.D. 1984. Introduction to The bungalow : the production of a global culture. The bungalow : the production of a global culture. Routledge Kegan Paul. 1–13.
[115]
King, Anthony D. 2004. Spaces of global cultures: architecture, urbanism, identity. Routledge.
[116]
Kosofsky Sedgwick, E. 2003. Shame, Theatricality, and Queer Performativity: Henry James’s The Art of the Novel. Touching feeling: affect, pedagogy, performativity. Duke University Press. 35–66.
[117]
Kusno, A. 2000. Behind the postcolonial: architecture, urban space, and political cultures in Indonesia. Routledge.
[118]
Lacan, J. et al. 1998. The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. Vintage.
[119]
LaCapra, D. 2001. Writing history, writing trauma. Writing history, writing trauma. Johns Hopkins University Press. 1–42.
[120]
Lahiji, N. 2011. The political unconscious of architecture: re-opening Jameson’s narrative. Ashgate.
[121]
Laplanche, J. 1998. Interpretation between Determinism and Hermeneutics. Essays on otherness. Routledge. 138–165.
[122]
Latour, B. 1993. Crisis. We have never been modern. Harvard University Press. 1–12.
[123]
Laura Mulvey 1996. Cinematic Space: Desiring and Deciphering. Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. Black Dog Publishing.
[124]
Leach, A. 2010. Evidence. What is architectural history?. Polity. 76–96.
[125]
Lloyd Thomas, K. 2013. Between the womb and the world: building matrixial relations in the NICU. Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity. Routledge. 192–208.
[126]
Lydia Martens 2007. The visible and the invisible: (De)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices. Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination. I.B. Tauris. 34–48.
[127]
Mario Carpo 2003. Drawing with Numbers: Geometry and Numeracy in Early Modern Architectural Design. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 62, 4 (2003), 448–469.
[128]
Material Matters: http://www.tandfebooks.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/ISBN/9780203013625.
[129]
Matrix (Organization) 1984. Making space: women and the man-made environment. Pluto Press.
[130]
Maxwell, R. 2015. Reckoning with Colin Rowe: ten architects take position. Routledge.
[131]
Michel Foucault 2007. Course context: Commentary from Security, Territory, Population: Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Palgrave Macmillan. 369–401.
[132]
Miller, D. 2001. Possessions. Home possessions : material culture behind closed doors. Berg. 107–121.
[133]
Mills, R. 2006. Queer is Here? Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Histories and Public Culture. History Workshop Journal. 62, 1 (Jan. 2006), 253–263. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbl006.
[134]
Mills, R. 2008. Theorizing the Queer Museum. Museums & Social Issues. 3, 1 (Apr. 2008), 41–52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1179/msi.2008.3.1.41.
[135]
Moore-Gilbert, B. J. 1997. Postcolonial theory: contexts, practices, politics. Verso.
[136]
Mulvey, L. 1992. Pandora: topographies of the mask and curiosity. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press. 53–71.
[137]
Nalbantoglu, Gülsüm Baydar and Wong, Chong Thai 1997. Postcolonial space(s). Princeton Architectural Press.
[138]
Nathan Moore 2013. Diagramming control. Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity. Routledge. 56–70.
[139]
Nietzsche, F.W. 1994. On the utility and liability of history for life (Sections 1-3). Unfashionable observations. Stanford University Press. 87–108.
[140]
Paul Virilio 2007. The Third Interval. Re-think-ing tech-nol-ogy: a reader in architectural theory. Routledge. 375–383.
[141]
Penner, B. 2009. (Re)Designing the "Unmentionable”: Female Toilets in the Twentieth Century from Ladies and Gents: Public Toilets and Gender. Ladies and gents: public toilets and gender. Temple University Press. 141–150.
[142]
Petrescu, D. 2007. Altering practices. Altering practices: feminist politics and poetics of space. Routledge. 1–14.
[143]
Petrescu, D. 2007. Altering practices. Altering practices: feminist politics and poetics of space. Routledge. 1–18.
[144]
Petrescu, D. Gardeners of commons, for the most part, women. Taylor & Francis eBooks - Relational Architectural Ecologies. 261–276.
[145]
Pile, S. 1996. The body and the city: psychoanalysis, space and subjectivity. Routledge.
[146]
Plant, S. 1997. Zeros + ones: women, cyberspace + the new technoculture. Fourth Estate.
[147]
Pollock, G. 2000. Excerpts from ‘Modernity and the Spaces of Femininity’. Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge. 154–167.
[148]
Rawes, P. 2007. Chapter 7 Bridges, Envelopes and Horizons. Irigaray for architects. Routledge. 75–88.
[149]
Rawes, P. 2007. Irigaray for architects. Routledge.
[150]
Rendell, J. 2007. Critical architecture. Routledge.
[151]
Rendell, J. 1998. Doing it, (Un)Doing it, (Over)Doing it Yourself: Rhetorics of Architectural Abuse. Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user. Routledge. 229–246.
[152]
Rendell, J. 2000. Introduction: Gender, Space, Architecture. Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge. 225–239.
[153]
Rendell, J. 1996. Subjective Space: an Architectural History of the Burlington Arcade. Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. Black Dog Publishing. 216–233.
[154]
Rendell, J. 2002. The pursuit of pleasure: gender, space & architecture in Regency London. Athlone.
[155]
Rendell, J. 2012. The Transitional Space of the Social Condensor. Architecture as Cultural Artefact. Routledge.
[156]
Researching female public toilets: gendered spaces, disciplinary limits: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol6/iss2/6/.
[157]
Riemer, J.W. 1977. Varieties of Opportunistic Research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 5, 4 (Jan. 1977), 467–477. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/089124167700500405.
[158]
Rose, Nikolas S. 2007. Politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
[159]
Said, Edward W. 1993. Culture and imperialism. Chatto and Windus.
[160]
Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. Vintage Books.
[161]
Said, E.W. 2006. Orientalism. The post-colonial studies reader. Routledge. 24–27.
[162]
Sanford Kwinter The ‘avant-garde’ in America (or The fallacy of misplaced concreteness). Far from equilibrium: essays on technology and design culture. Actar-D. 74–89.
[163]
Scriver, P. and Prakash, V. 2007. Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon.
[164]
Serres, M. and Latour, B. 1995. First conversation : background and training. Conversations on science, culture, and time. University of Michigan Press. 1–42.
[165]
Shonfield, K. 1998. Glossing with graininess: cross occupations in postwar British film and architecture. The Journal of Architecture. 3, 4 (Jan. 1998), 355–375. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/136023698374134.
[166]
Sigmund Freud 1964. Constructions in analysis. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 23: (1937-1939). The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis. 255–269.
[167]
Smith, M. Queering the Historic Home: Using Contemporary Art to Reveal Britain’s Eighteenth and Twentieth Century Gay Histories. Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches. Bloomsbury Academic.
[168]
Spivak, G.C. 1999. A critique of postcolonial reason: toward a history of the vanishing present. Harvard University Press.
[169]
Spivak, G.C. 2006. Can the subaltern speak? The post-colonial studies reader. Routledge. 28–37.
[170]
Stanford Anderson 2002. Quasi-Autonomy in Architecture: The Search for an ‘In-Between’. Perspecta. 33, (2002), 30–37.
[171]
Stephen Cairns 2007. Chapter 3: The Stone Books of Orientalism. Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon. Routledge. 51–65.
[172]
Stern, R. 1984. The Doubles of Post-Modern. The Harvard Architectural Review. 1 (1984).
[173]
Stiegler, Bernard 1998. Technics and time: 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press.
[174]
Tafuri, M. 1976. Reason’s adventures: naturalism and the city in the century of the enlightenment. Architecture and utopia: design and capitalist development. M.I.T. Press. 1–40.
[175]
Tafuri, M. 1998. Toward a Critique of Architectural Ideology. Architecture theory since 1968. (1998), 28–33.
[176]
Tendencies and Trajectories: Feminist Approaches in Architecture : SAGE Knowledge: http://knowledge.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/hdbk_architectheory/n6.xml.
[177]
The Ego and the Id: http://www.pep-web.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/document.php?id=se.019.0001a#p0048.
[178]
The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration and the Writing of History : SAGE Knowledge: http://knowledge.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/hdbk_historicaltheory/n7.xml.
[179]
Thomas Lemke 2011. The government of living beings: Michel Foucault. Biopolitics: an Advanced Introduction. NYU Press. 33–52.
[180]
Thompson, E.P. 1978. The poverty of theory, or An orrery of errors, Section VII. The poverty of theory and other essays. Merlin Press. 229–242.
[181]
Urbach, H. 2000. Closets, clothes, disClosure. Gender space architecture : an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge. 342–352.
[182]
Utopia’s Ghost: Architecture and Postmondernism: https://muse-jhu-edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/9780816673698.
[183]
Victor Buchli 2013. Consumption studies and the home. An anthropology of architecture. Bloomsbury. 117–135.
[184]
Virilio, Paul and Rose, Julie 1997. Open sky. Verso.
[185]
Walker, L. 2000. Women in architecture. Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge. 244–257.
[186]
Wallach Scott, J. 2000. Excerpts from ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’. Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge. 74–87.
[187]
Wallenstein, S.-O. 2009. Chapters starting with Introduction, The notion of biopolitics and the emergence of man [etc]. Biopolitics and the emergence of modern architecture. Princeton Architectural Press. 4–48.
[188]
Walsh, W.H. 1967. What is philosophy of history? An introduction to philosophy of history. Hutchinson. 11–29.
[189]
Warner, M. 1999. The trouble with normal: sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. Harvard University Press.
[190]
White, P. 1992. Female Spectator, Lesbian Specter: The Haunting. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press.
[191]
Williams, R.J. 2013. Sex and buildings: modern architecture and the sexual revolution. Reaktion.
[192]
Wolfflin, E. 1967. Renaissance and Baroque - Parts I and II. Renaissance and Baroque. Cornell University Press. 29–88.
[193]
Wright, G. 1991. The politics of design in French colonial urbanism. University of Chicago Press.
[194]
Zizek, S. 2011. The architectural parallax. The political unconscious of architecture: re-opening Jameson’s narrative. Ashgate. 253–295.
