1
Borden I, Rendell J. From chamber to transformer: epistemological challenges in the methodology of theorised architectural history. The Journal of Architecture 2000;5:215–28. doi:10.1080/136023600408719
2
Carr EH. Ch. 2: Society and the individual. In: What is history? Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2001. 25–49.
3
Hayden White. The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory. History and Theory 1984;23:1–33.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2504969
4
Thompson EP. The poverty of theory, or An orrery of errors, Section VII. In: The poverty of theory and other essays. London: : Merlin Press 1978. 229–42.
5
Leach A. Evidence. In: What is architectural history? Cambridge: : Polity 2010. 76–96.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8277803b-6836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
6
Culler J. Introduction: What’s the Point? In: The Point of theory: practices of cultural analysis. Amsterdam: : Amsterdam University Press 1994.
7
Dorrian M. Criticism, negation, action. The Journal of Architecture 2005;10:229–33. doi:10.1080/13602360500162477
8
Walsh WH. What is philosophy of history? In: An introduction to philosophy of history. London: : Hutchinson 1967. 11–29.
9
Nietzsche FW. On the utility and liability of history for life (Sections 1-3). In: Unfashionable observations. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1994. 87–108.
10
Doran R. The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration and the Writing of History : SAGE Knowledge. Part I: Foundations: Theoretical Frameworks for Knowledge of the Past Chapter 1: The Turn towards ‘Science’: Historians Delivering Untheorized Truth Chapter 2: The Implications of Empiricism for History Chapter 3: The Case for Historical Imagination: Defending the Human Factor and Narrative Chapter 4: The Annales School: Variations on Realism, Methods and Time Chapter 5: Intellectual History: From Ideas to Meanings Chapter 6: Social History: A New Kind of History Chapter 7: The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration, and the Writing of History Chapter 8: The Work of Hayden White II: Defamiliarizing Narrative Chapter 9: Derrida and Deconstruction: Challenges to the Transparency of Language Chapter 10: The Return of Rhetoric Chapter 11: Michel Foucault: The Unconscious of History and Culture Chapter 12: History as Text: Narrative Theory and History Chapter 13: The Boundaries of History and Fiction Part II: Applications: Theory-Intensive Areas of History Chapter 14: The Newest Social History: Crisis and Renewal Chapter 15: Women’s History/Feminist History Chapter 16: Gender I: From Women’s History to Gender History Chapter 17: Gender II: Masculinity Acquires a History Chapter 18: Sexuality and History Chapter 19: Psychoanalysis and the Making of History Chapter 20: New National Narratives Chapter 21: Cultural Studies and History Chapter 22: Memory: Witness, Experience, Collective Meaning Chapter 23: Postcolonial Theory and History Part III: Coda. Post-postmodernism: Directions and Interrogations Chapter 24: Post-positivist Realism: Regrounding Representation Chapter 25: Historical Experience beyond the Linguistic Turn Chapter 26: Photographs: Reading the Image for History Chapter 27: Digital Information: ‘Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom …’ is Digital a Cultural Revolution? Chapter 28: Recovering the Self: Agency after Deconstruction Chapter 29: The Fundamental Things Apply: Aristotle’s Narrative Theory and the Classical Origins of Postmodern History Previous Entry Next Entry Text size Chapter 7: The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration and the Writing of History. http://knowledge.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/hdbk_historicaltheory/n7.xml
11
LaCapra D. Writing history, writing trauma. In: Writing history, writing trauma. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins University Press 2001. 1–42.
12
Laplanche J. Interpretation between Determinism and Hermeneutics. In: Essays on otherness. London: : Routledge 1998. 138–65.
13
de Cetreau M. Psychoanalysis and its History. In: Heterologies: discourse on the other. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 1986. 3–16.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bcd6a4b8-08fc-ee11-8076-0050f2f05a7b
14
Evans R. Translations from drawing to building. In: Translations from drawing to building and other essays. London: : Architectural Association 1997. 153–94.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5e8148f9-8d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
15
Colomina B. Archive. In: Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1996. 1–15.
16
Colomina B. Interior. In: Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1996. 232–81.
17
Banham PR. Oases and resorts. In: Scenes in America deserta. London: : Thames and Hudson 1982. 21–44.
18
Banham PR. The eye of the beholder. In: Scenes in America deserta. London: : Thames and Hudson 1982. 209–28.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=7a2b86f1-5736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
19
Forty A. Design. In: Words and buildings: a vocabulary of modern architecture. London: : Thames & Hudson 2000. 136–41.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4f82665a-5836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
20
Barthes R. Myth Today. Turk’s head review
21
Bonta JP. From Written Dissemination to Text Analysis. In: Architecture and its interpretation: a study of expressive systems in architecture. London: : Lund Humphries 1979. 175–224.
22
Carpo M. Prologue : architectural culture and technological context. In: Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2001. 1–15.
23
Carpo M. Architectural drawing in the age of its mechanical reproduction : Serlio. In: Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2001. 42–56.https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/cn69m449x
24
Eco U. Function and sign : the semiotics of architecture. In: Rethinking architecture : a reader in cultural theory. London: : Routledge 1997. 182–202.
25
Fraser M. Introduction. In: Design research in architecture: an overview. Farnham: : Ashgate 2013. 1–14.
26
Hill J. Design research: the first 500 years. In: Design research in architecture: an overview. Farnham: : Ashgate 2013. 15–34.
27
Douglas M. Chapter 2 - Secular defilement. In: Purity and danger: an analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. London: : Routledge 2002. 36–50.
28
Forty A. Chapter 7 - Hygiene and Cleanliness. In: Objects of desire: design and society since 1750. London: : Thames and Hudson 1986. 156–81.
29
Victor Buchli. Consumption studies and the home. In: An anthropology of architecture. London: : Bloomsbury 2013. 117–35.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e4a551a2-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
30
Buchli V, Lucas G. The archaeology of alienation : a late twentieth-century British council house. In: Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: : Routledge 2001. 158–67.
31
Judy Attfield. The Tufted Carpet in Britain: Its Rise from the Bottom of the Pile, 1952-1970. Journal of Design History 1994;7:205–16.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1316116
32
Attfield, Judy. Wild things: the material culture of everyday life. Oxford: : Berg 2000.
33
Bender B. Landscape and politics. In: The material culture reader. Oxford: : Berg 2002. 135–74.
34
Buchli V. Architecture and the domestic sphere. In: The material culture reader. Oxford: : Berg 2002. 207–13.
35
Campkin B. Ornament from grime: David Adjaye’s Dirty House, the architectural ‘aesthetic of recycling’ and the Gritty Brits. The Journal of Architecture 2007;12:367–92. doi:10.1080/13602360701614649
36
Campkin B. Placing "Matter Out Of Place”: Purity and Danger as Evidence for Architecture and Urbanism. Architectural Theory Review 2013;18:46–61. doi:10.1080/13264826.2013.785579
37
Fardon R. Citations out of place, or, Lord Palmerston goes viral in the nineteenth century but gets lost in the twentieth. Anthropology Today 2013;29:25–7. doi:10.1111/1467-8322.12007
38
Lydia Martens. The visible and the invisible: (De)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices. In: Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination. London: : I.B. Tauris 2007. 34–48.https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma990020863730204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Dirt:%20new%20geographies%20of%20cleanliness%20and%20contamination&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9072258131107472785&offset=0
39
B. Campkin, R. Cox. The visible and invisible: (de|)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices. In: Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination. London: : I.B. Tauris 2007. 34–48.
40
Daniel Miller. Behind closed doors. In: Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: : Berg 2001. 1–19.
41
Miller D. Possessions. In: Home possessions : material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: : Berg 2001. 107–21.
42
Penner B. (Re)Designing the "Unmentionable”: Female Toilets in the Twentieth Century from Ladies and Gents: Public Toilets and Gender. In: Ladies and gents: public toilets and gender. Philadelphia: : Temple University Press 2009. 141–50.https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14btdn9.14?seq=1
43
Riemer JW. Varieties of Opportunistic Research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 1977;5:467–77. doi:10.1177/089124167700500405
44
Shonfield K. Glossing with graininess: cross occupations in postwar British film and architecture. The Journal of Architecture 1998;3:355–75. doi:10.1080/136023698374134
45
Katherine Schonfield. Dirt is matter out of place. In: Architecture: the subject is matter. London: : Routledge 2001. 30–43. doi:10.4324/9781315011356
46
E. Shove. Constructing home: a crossroads of choice. In: At home: an anthropology of domestic space. Syracuse, N.Y.: : Syracuse University Press 1999. 130–43.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ea239597-a59f-ec11-a22a-0050f2f0d45d
47
Bhabha HK. DissemiNation : time, narrative and the margins of the modern nation. In: The location of culture. London: : Routledge 2004. 199–244.
48
Celik Z. Colonialism, Orientalism and the canon. In: Intersections : architectural histories and critical theories. London: : Routledge 2000. 161–9.
49
Chakrabarty D. Chapter 1: Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History. In: Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference.27–46.http://quod.lib.umich.edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb04798.0001.001;didno=heb04798.0001.001;view=image;seq=00000039;node=heb04798.0001.001%3A4.1
50
King AD. Introduction to The bungalow : the production of a global culture. In: The bungalow : the production of a global culture. London: : Routledge Kegan Paul 1984. 1–13.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=52345d44-3116-e811-80cd-005056af4099
51
Said EW. Orientalism. In: The post-colonial studies reader. London: : Routledge 2006. 24–7.
52
Spivak GC. Can the subaltern speak? In: The post-colonial studies reader. London: : Routledge 2006. 28–37.
53
King AD. Introduction. In: The bungalow : the production of a global culture. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1984. 1–13.
54
Stephen Cairns. Chapter 3: The Stone Books of Orientalism. In: Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon. London: : Routledge 2007. 51–65.
55
Çelik, Zeynep. Urban forms and colonial confrontations: Algiers under French rule. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1997. https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/ws859g31f
56
Crinson M. Modern architecture and the end of empire. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2003.
57
Fraser M, Kerr J. Architecture and the ‘special relationship’: the American influence on post-war British architecture. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007.
58
Hernández F. The transcultural phenomenon, and the transculturation of architecture. The Journal of Romance Studies 2002;2:1–15. doi:10.3828/jrs.2.3.1
59
Hernández F. Bhabha for architects. London: : Routledge 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203855935
60
Jyoti Hosagrahar. ’Interrogating Difference: Postcolonial Perspectives in Architecture and Urbanism. In: The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2012. 70–84.https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14424236330004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
61
Nalbantoglu, Gülsüm Baydar, Wong, Chong Thai. Postcolonial space(s). New York: : Princeton Architectural Press 1997.
62
Moore-Gilbert, B. J. Postcolonial theory: contexts, practices, politics. London: : Verso 1997.
63
King AD. Actually existing postcolonialisms : colonial urbanism and architecture after the postcolonial turn. In: Postcolonial urbanism : Southeast Asian cities and global processes. London: : Routledge 2003. 167–83.
64
King, Anthony D. Spaces of global cultures: architecture, urbanism, identity. London: : Routledge 2004.
65
Kusno A. Behind the postcolonial: architecture, urban space, and political cultures in Indonesia. London: : Routledge 2000.
66
Said, Edward W. Orientalism. 1st Vintage Books ed. New York: : Vintage Books 1979.
67
Said, Edward W. Culture and imperialism. London: : Chatto and Windus 1993.
68
Scriver P, Prakash V. Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon. London: 2007. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9780203964262
69
Spivak GC. A critique of postcolonial reason: toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.
70
Wright G. The politics of design in French colonial urbanism. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
71
Ahmed S. Queer phenomenology: orientations, objects, others. Durham, [N.C.]: : Duke University Press 2006. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5021904050004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
72
Bermann K. The house behind. In: Places through the body. London: : Routledge 1998. 165–80.
73
Butler J. Subjects of sex, gender, desire. In: Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: : Routledge 2006. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8a0ef3d0-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
74
Burns K. Ex libris: Archaeologies of Feminism, Architecture and Deconstruction. Architectural Theory Review 2010;15:242–65. doi:10.1080/13264826.2010.524706
75
Mills R. Queer is Here? Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Histories and Public Culture. History Workshop Journal 2006;62:253–63. doi:10.1093/hwj/dbl006
76
Petrescu D. Altering practices. In: Altering practices: feminist politics and poetics of space. London: : Routledge 2007. 1–14.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8d9b88a5-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
77
Brown LA. Introduction. In: Feminist practices: interdisciplinary approaches to women in architecture. Farnham: : Ashgate 2011. 1–15.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cadf895b-7b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
78
Agrest, Diana, Conway, Patricia, Weisman, Leslie. The sex of architecture. New York: : Harry N. Abrams 1996.
79
Agrest D. Architecture from without: body logic and sex. In: Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995. New York: : Princeton Architectural Press 1996. 541–53.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d085d5f0-5bab-ec11-a99b-0050f2f06092
80
Betsky A. Queer space: architecture and same-sex desire. New York: : William Morrow & Co 1997.
81
Bonnevier K. Behind straight curtains: towards a queer feminist theory of architecture. Stockholm: : Axl Books 2007.
82
Campkin B, Pilkey B. Queering Home. In: Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches. London: : Bloomsbury Aademic
83
Campkin B, Penner B. Beyond Home. In: Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches. London: : Bloomsbury Academic
84
Campkin B, Hunt J. Letters Home: Queer Domestic Politics Provoked by the Actions of Performance Artist Benjamin Sebastian. In: Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches. London: : Bloomsbury Academic
85
Coleman D. Introduction from ‘Architecture and feminism’. In: Architecture and feminism. New York: : Princeton Architectural Press 1996. ix–xvi.
86
Durning ML, Wrigley R. Gender and architecture. Chichester: : Wiley 2000.
87
Colomina B, Bloomer J. Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992.
88
Hayden, Dolores. The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1981.
89
Hughes, Francesca. The architect: reconstructing her practice. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1996.
90
Jagose A. Queer theory: an introduction. New York: : New York University Press 1996.
91
Rendell J. Subjective Space: an Architectural History of the Burlington Arcade. In: Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. London: : Black Dog Publishing 1996. 216–33.
92
Matrix (Organization). Making space: women and the man-made environment. London: : Pluto Press 1984.
93
Mills R. Theorizing the Queer Museum. Museums & Social Issues 2008;3:41–52. doi:10.1179/msi.2008.3.1.41
94
Penner B. Researching female public toilets: gendered spaces, disciplinary limits. http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol6/iss2/6/
95
Petrescu D. Gardeners of commons, for the most part, women. In: Taylor & Francis eBooks - Relational Architectural Ecologies.261–76.http://www.tandfebooks.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/ISBN/9780203770283
96
Petrescu D. Altering practices. In: Altering practices: feminist politics and poetics of space. London: : Routledge 2007. 1–18.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8d9b88a5-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
97
Pollock G. Excerpts from ‘Modernity and the Spaces of Femininity’. In: Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. 154–67.
98
Rawes P. Irigaray for architects. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007.
99
Rendell J. Doing it, (Un)Doing it, (Over)Doing it Yourself: Rhetorics of Architectural Abuse. In: Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user. London: : Routledge 1998. 229–46.
100
Rendell J. Introduction: Gender, Space, Architecture. In: Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. 225–39.
101
Rendell J. The pursuit of pleasure: gender, space & architecture in Regency London. London: : Athlone 2002.
102
Tendencies and Trajectories: Feminist Approaches in Architecture : SAGE Knowledge. http://knowledge.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/hdbk_architectheory/n6.xml
103
Kosofsky Sedgwick E. Shame, Theatricality, and Queer Performativity: Henry James’s The Art of the Novel. In: Touching feeling: affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2003. 35–66.
104
Smith M. Queering the Historic Home: Using Contemporary Art to Reveal Britain’s Eighteenth and Twentieth Century Gay Histories. In: Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches. London: : Bloomsbury Academic
105
Urbach H. Closets, clothes, disClosure. In: Gender space architecture : an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. 342–52.
106
Walker L. Women in architecture. In: Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. 244–57.
107
Wallach Scott J. Excerpts from ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’. In: Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. 74–87.
108
Warner M. The trouble with normal: sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.
109
White P. Female Spectator, Lesbian Specter: The Haunting. In: Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992.
110
Williams RJ. Sex and buildings: modern architecture and the sexual revolution. London: : Reaktion 2013.
111
Guattari F. La Borde: a clinic unlike any other. In: Chaosophy: Texts and interview 1972-1977. Semiotext(e) 2007. 176–94.
112
Holm L. Introduction: Vision and its doubles. In: Brunelleschi, Lacan, Le Corbusier: architecture, space and the construction of subjectivity. London: : Routledge 2010. 1–18.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=778f581e-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
113
Zizek S. The architectural parallax. In: The political unconscious of architecture: re-opening Jameson’s narrative. Farnham: : Ashgate 2011. 253–95.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5def1c84-7b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
114
Sigmund Freud. Constructions in analysis. In: The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 23: (1937-1939). London: : The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis 1964. 255–69.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=34633418-3816-e811-80cd-005056af4099
115
Blum, Virginia. Psychotopologies: closing the circuit between psychic and material space. Environment and Planning - Part D 1AD;29:1030–47.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/d11910
116
Burgin V. Geometry and abjection. In: In/different spaces : place and memory in visual culture. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1996. 38–56.
117
Burgin V. Perverse Space. In: Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992. 219–40.
118
Burgoyne B. Autism and Topology. In: Drawing the soul: schemas and models in psychoanalysis. London: : Karnac 2003. 198–212.
119
Castoriadis C. The psyche and the society anew. In: Figures of the Thinkable.353–77.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bbd727a0-6d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
120
Colomina B. The Split Wall: Domestic Voyeurism. In: Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992. 73–128.
121
Cousins M. Where? In: Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. London: : Black Dog Publishing 1996. 107–14.
122
Freud S. The Ego and the Id. http://www.pep-web.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/document.php?id=se.019.0001a#p0048
123
Freud S. A Note on the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis. In: The essentials of psycho-analysis. London: : Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis 1986. 81–215.
124
Freud S. Instincts and their Vicissitudes. In: The essentials of psycho-analysis. London: : Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis 1986. 197–217.
125
Holm L. What Lacan said re: architecture. Critical Quarterly 2000;42:29–64. doi:10.1111/1467-8705.00286
126
Grosz EA. Space, time, and bodies. In: Space, time, and perversion : essays on the politics of bodies. London: : Routledge 1995. 83–7.
127
Lacan J, Miller J-A, Sheridan A, et al. The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. London: : Vintage 1998.
128
Mulvey L. Pandora: topographies of the mask and curiosity. In: Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992. 53–71.
129
Laura Mulvey. Cinematic Space: Desiring and Deciphering. In: Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. London: : Black Dog Publishing 1996.
130
Pile S. The body and the city: psychoanalysis, space and subjectivity. London: : Routledge 1996.
131
Rendell J. The Transitional Space of the Social Condensor. In: Architecture as Cultural Artefact. London: : Routledge 2012.
132
Heynen H. Architecture as critique of modernity. In: Architecture and modernity: a critique. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT 1999. 148, 249-218,258.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=04f14145-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
133
Tafuri M. Reason’s adventures: naturalism and the city in the century of the enlightenment. In: Architecture and utopia: design and capitalist development. Cambridge, Mass: : M.I.T. Press 1976. 1–40.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=26d56ebf-705b-ee11-830d-0050f2f05a7b
134
Jameson F. Architecture and the critique of ideology. In: Architecture, criticism, ideology. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1985. 51–87.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=78f6c13f-7636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
135
Stanford Anderson. Quasi-Autonomy in Architecture: The Search for an ‘In-Between’. Perspecta 2002;33:30–7.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1567294?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
136
Aureli PV, Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture. The project of autonomy: politics and architecture within and against capitalism. New York: : Princeton Architectural 2008.
137
Baird G. ‘Criticality’ and its discontents. http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/21/criticality-and-its-discontents
138
Colquhoun A. Essays in architectural criticism: modern architecture and historical change. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1981.
139
Eisenman P. Autonomy and the Will to the Critical. Written into the void: selected writings, 1990-2004 2007;:94–9.
140
K. Michael Hays. Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form. Perspecta 1984;21:14–29.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1567078?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
141
Hays KM. Architecture’s desire: reading the late avant-garde. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2010.
142
Heynen H. What belongs to architecture?’ Avant-garde ideas in the modern movement. The Journal of Architecture 1999;4:129–47. doi:10.1080/136023699373882
143
H. Heynen. About histories and theory. The Journal of Architecture 2002;7:205–20. doi:10.1080/13602360210153656
144
Jameson F. Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism. London: : Verso 1991.
145
Jameson F. The Brick and the Balloon: Architecture, Idealism and Land Speculation. New Left Review;:25–46.http://newleftreview.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/I/228/fredric-jameson-the-brick-and-the-balloon-architecture-idealism-and-land-speculation
146
Lahiji N. The political unconscious of architecture: re-opening Jameson’s narrative. Farnham: : Ashgate 2011.
147
Martin R. Utopia’s Ghost: Architecture and Postmondernism. https://muse-jhu-edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/9780816673698
148
Kate Nesbitt. The Sublime and Modern Architecture: Unmasking (An Aesthetic of) Abstraction. New Literary History 1995;26:95–110.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20057270?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
149
Maxwell R. Reckoning with Colin Rowe: ten architects take position. New York, NY: : Routledge 2015.
150
Rendell J. Critical architecture. London: : Routledge 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945667
151
Tafuri M. Toward a Critique of Architectural Ideology. Architecture theory since 1968 1998;:28–33.
152
Wolfflin E. Renaissance and Baroque - Parts I and II. In: Renaissance and Baroque. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1967. 29–88.
153
Stern R. The Doubles of Post-Modern. The Harvard Architectural Review 1984.
154
Lloyd Thomas K. Between the womb and the world: building matrixial relations in the NICU. In: Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity. London: : Routledge 2013. 192–208.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e9b9167b-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
155
Giedion S. The Assembly Line and Scientific Management. In: Mechanization takes command: a contribution to anonymous history.79–121.https://www-fulcrum-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/concern/monographs/3484zh00p
156
Latour B. Crisis. In: We have never been modern. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1993. 1–12.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d8c3609d-6036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
157
Allen B. The Technical. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7v967.6
158
Allen B. Technology. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7v967.8
159
Bijsterveld K. Infernal din, heavenly tunes : repertoires of dramatizing sound. In: Mechanical sound : technology, culture, and public problems of noise in the twentieth century. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2008. 27–51.
160
Bressani M. Viollet-le-Ducs’s optic. In: Architecture and the sciences : exchanging metaphors. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University School of Architecture 2003. 119–39.
161
Brown N. Immortality by Design. Parallax 2008;14:4–20. doi:10.1080/13534640802159096
162
Mario Carpo. Drawing with Numbers: Geometry and Numeracy in Early Modern Architectural Design. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 2003;62:448–69.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592497
163
Feenberg A. Technology, philosophy, politics. In: Questioning technology. London: : Routledge 1999. 1–17.
164
Galison, Peter, 1955-; Thompson, Emily Ann. The architecture of science. MIT Press 1999. http://quod.lib.umich.edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb08330.0001.001
165
Benjamin W. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In: Illuminations. London: : Pimlico 1999. 211–35.
166
Arie Graafland, Heidi Sohn. Introduction: Science and virtuality. In: The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2012. 467–83.https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14424236330004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
167
Heidegger M. The question concerning technology. In: The question concerning technology, and other essays. London: : Harper & Row 1977. 3–35.
168
Sanford Kwinter. The ‘avant-garde’ in America (or The fallacy of misplaced concreteness). In: Far from equilibrium: essays on technology and design culture. Barcelona: : Actar-D 74–89.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1ad6bd5d-2f16-e811-80cd-005056af4099
169
Lloyd Thomas K. Material Matters. http://www.tandfebooks.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/ISBN/9780203013625
170
Serres M, Latour B. First conversation : background and training. In: Conversations on science, culture, and time. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 1995. 1–42.
171
Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and time: 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1998.
172
Virilio, Paul, Rose, Julie. Open sky. London: : Verso 1997.
173
Paul Virilio. The Third Interval. In: Re-think-ing tech-nol-ogy: a reader in architectural theory. London: : Routledge 2007. 375–83.
174
Braidotti R. Transpositions: on nomadic ethics. Cambridge: : Polity 2006.
175
Haraway DJ. The Haraway reader. New York: : Routledge 2004.
176
Plant S. Zeros + ones: women, cyberspace + the new technoculture. London: : Fourth Estate 1997.
177
Rawes P. Chapter 7 Bridges, Envelopes and Horizons. In: Irigaray for architects. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007. 75–88.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3d7c94cd-fea8-ec11-a99b-0050f2f06092
178
Foucault M, Senellart M. Course Summary and context from The birth of biopolitics. In: The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008. 317–31.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=559abeef-7936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
179
Thomas Lemke. The government of living beings: Michel Foucault. In: Biopolitics: an Advanced Introduction. New York: : NYU Press 2011. 33–52.http://muse.jhu.edu/book/11107
180
Wallenstein S-O. Chapters starting with Introduction, The notion of biopolitics and the emergence of man [etc]. In: Biopolitics and the emergence of modern architecture. New York: : Princeton Architectural Press 2009. 4–48.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c0e48028-7e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
181
Foucault M. Ch. 5: Lecture 8 February 1978 from Security, Territory, Population. In: Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007. 115–30.https://r4.vlereader.com/Reader?ean=9780230245075
182
Michel Foucault. Course context: Commentary from Security, Territory, Population: In: Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007. 369–401.https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780230245075
183
Foucault M. Ch. 13: Lecture 5 April 1978 from Security, Territory, Population. In: Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007. 333–58.https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14703984000004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
184
Agamben, Giorgio. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1998.
185
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham [N.C.]: : Duke University Press 2010. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1215/9780822391623
186
Butler, Judith. Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. London: : Verso 2004.
187
Braidotti R. Posthuman Relational Subjectivity. In: Taylor & Francis eBooks - Relational Architectural Ecologies.21–39.http://www.tandfebooks.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/ISBN/9780203770283
188
Hauptmann D, Neidich W. Introduction: Architecture and mind in the age of communication and information. In: Cognitive architecture: from biopolitics to noopolitics : architecture & mind in the age of communication and information. Rotterdam: : 010 Publishers 2010. 10–43.
189
Campbell, Timothy C. Improper life: technology and biopolitics from Heidegger to Agamben. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2011. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttth0h
190
Clough P, Willse C. Beyond Biopolitics: Essays on Governance of Life and Death. 2011. doi:10.1215/9780822394235
191
Foucault M, Hutton PH, Martin LH, et al. Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. London: : Tavistock 1988.
192
Nathan Moore. Diagramming control. In: Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity. London: : Routledge 2013. 56–70.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781135037222
193
Rose, Nikolas S. Politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2007. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rqmf
194
Bourriaud, Nicolas. A precarious existence: vulnerability in the public domain. Rotterdam: : NAi Publishers 2009.
