[1]
I. Borden and J. Rendell, ‘From chamber to transformer: epistemological challenges in the methodology of theorised architectural history’, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 215–228, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1080/136023600408719.
[2]
E. H. Carr, ‘Ch. 2: Society and the individual’, in What is history?, New ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001, pp. 25–49.
[3]
Hayden White, ‘The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory’, History and Theory, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 1984 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2504969
[4]
E. P. Thompson, ‘The poverty of theory, or An orrery of errors, Section VII’, in The poverty of theory and other essays, London: Merlin Press, 1978, pp. 229–242.
[5]
A. Leach, ‘Evidence’, in What is architectural history?, Cambridge: Polity, 2010, pp. 76–96 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8277803b-6836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[6]
J. Culler, ‘Introduction: What’s the Point?’, in The Point of theory: practices of cultural analysis, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1994.
[7]
M. Dorrian, ‘Criticism, negation, action’, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 229–233, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1080/13602360500162477.
[8]
W. H. Walsh, ‘What is philosophy of history?’, in An introduction to philosophy of history, 3rd rev. ed., London: Hutchinson, 1967, pp. 11–29.
[9]
F. W. Nietzsche, ‘On the utility and liability of history for life (Sections 1-3)’, in Unfashionable observations, vol. The Complete works of Friedrich Nietzsche, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1994, pp. 87–108.
[10]
R. Doran, ‘The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration and the Writing of History : SAGE Knowledge’, Part I: Foundations: Theoretical Frameworks for Knowledge of the Past Chapter 1: The Turn towards ‘Science’: Historians Delivering Untheorized Truth Chapter 2: The Implications of Empiricism for History Chapter 3: The Case for Historical Imagination: Defending the Human Factor and Narrative Chapter 4: The Annales School: Variations on Realism, Methods and Time Chapter 5: Intellectual History: From Ideas to Meanings Chapter 6: Social History: A New Kind of History Chapter 7: The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration, and the Writing of History Chapter 8: The Work of Hayden White II: Defamiliarizing Narrative Chapter 9: Derrida and Deconstruction: Challenges to the Transparency of Language Chapter 10: The Return of Rhetoric Chapter 11: Michel Foucault: The Unconscious of History and Culture Chapter 12: History as Text: Narrative Theory and History Chapter 13: The Boundaries of History and Fiction Part II: Applications: Theory-Intensive Areas of History Chapter 14: The Newest Social History: Crisis and Renewal Chapter 15: Women’s History/Feminist History Chapter 16: Gender I: From Women’s History to Gender History Chapter 17: Gender II: Masculinity Acquires a History Chapter 18: Sexuality and History Chapter 19: Psychoanalysis and the Making of History Chapter 20: New National Narratives Chapter 21: Cultural Studies and History Chapter 22: Memory: Witness, Experience, Collective Meaning Chapter 23: Postcolonial Theory and History Part III: Coda. Post-postmodernism: Directions and Interrogations Chapter 24: Post-positivist Realism: Regrounding Representation Chapter 25: Historical Experience beyond the Linguistic Turn Chapter 26: Photographs: Reading the Image for History Chapter 27: Digital Information: ‘Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom …’ is Digital a Cultural Revolution? Chapter 28: Recovering the Self: Agency after Deconstruction Chapter 29: The Fundamental Things Apply: Aristotle’s Narrative Theory and the Classical Origins of Postmodern History Previous Entry Next Entry Text size Chapter 7: The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration and the Writing of History. [Online]. Available: http://knowledge.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/hdbk_historicaltheory/n7.xml
[11]
D. LaCapra, ‘Writing history, writing trauma’, in Writing history, writing trauma, vol. Parallax, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001, pp. 1–42.
[12]
J. Laplanche, ‘Interpretation between Determinism and Hermeneutics’, in Essays on otherness, vol. Warwick studies in European philosophy, London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 138–165.
[13]
M. de Cetreau, ‘Psychoanalysis and its History’, in Heterologies: discourse on the other, vol. Theory and history of literature, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986, pp. 3–16 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bcd6a4b8-08fc-ee11-8076-0050f2f05a7b
[14]
R. Evans, ‘Translations from drawing to building’, in Translations from drawing to building and other essays, vol. AA documents; 2, London: Architectural Association, 1997, pp. 153–194 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5e8148f9-8d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[15]
B. Colomina, ‘Archive’, in Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996, pp. 1–15.
[16]
B. Colomina, ‘Interior’, in Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996, pp. 232–281.
[17]
P. R. Banham, ‘Oases and resorts’, in Scenes in America deserta, London: Thames and Hudson, 1982, pp. 21–44.
[18]
P. R. Banham, ‘The eye of the beholder’, in Scenes in America deserta, London: Thames and Hudson, 1982, pp. 209–228 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=7a2b86f1-5736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[19]
A. Forty, ‘Design’, in Words and buildings: a vocabulary of modern architecture, London: Thames & Hudson, 2000, pp. 136–141 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4f82665a-5836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[20]
R. Barthes, ‘Myth Today’, Turk’s head review.
[21]
J. P. Bonta, ‘From Written Dissemination to Text Analysis’, in Architecture and its interpretation: a study of expressive systems in architecture, London: Lund Humphries, 1979, pp. 175–224.
[22]
M. Carpo, ‘Prologue : architectural culture and technological context’, in Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2001, pp. 1–15.
[23]
M. Carpo, ‘Architectural drawing in the age of its mechanical reproduction : Serlio’, in Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2001, pp. 42–56 [Online]. Available: https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/cn69m449x
[24]
U. Eco, ‘Function and sign : the semiotics of architecture’, in Rethinking architecture : a reader in cultural theory, London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 182–202.
[25]
M. Fraser, ‘Introduction’, in Design research in architecture: an overview, vol. Design research in architecture, Farnham: Ashgate, 2013, pp. 1–14.
[26]
J. Hill, ‘Design research: the first 500 years’, in Design research in architecture: an overview, vol. Design research in architecture, Farnham: Ashgate, 2013, pp. 15–34.
[27]
M. Douglas, ‘Chapter 2 - Secular defilement’, in Purity and danger: an analysis of concept of pollution and taboo, vol. Routledge classics, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 36–50.
[28]
A. Forty, ‘Chapter 7 - Hygiene and Cleanliness’, in Objects of desire: design and society since 1750, London: Thames and Hudson, 1986, pp. 156–181.
[29]
Victor Buchli, ‘Consumption studies and the home’, in An anthropology of architecture, London: Bloomsbury, 2013, pp. 117–135 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e4a551a2-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[30]
V. Buchli and G. Lucas, ‘The archaeology of alienation : a late twentieth-century British council house’, in Archaeologies of the contemporary past, London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 158–167.
[31]
Judy Attfield, ‘The Tufted Carpet in Britain: Its Rise from the Bottom of the Pile, 1952-1970’, Journal of Design History, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 205–216, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1316116
[32]
Attfield, Judy, Wild things: the material culture of everyday life, vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 2000.
[33]
B. Bender, ‘Landscape and politics’, in The material culture reader, Oxford: Berg, 2002, pp. 135–174.
[34]
V. Buchli, ‘Architecture and the domestic sphere’, in The material culture reader, Oxford: Berg, 2002, pp. 207–213.
[35]
B. Campkin, ‘Ornament from grime: David Adjaye’s Dirty House, the architectural “aesthetic of recycling” and the Gritty Brits’, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 367–392, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1080/13602360701614649.
[36]
B. Campkin, ‘Placing "Matter Out Of Place”: Purity and Danger as Evidence for Architecture and Urbanism’, Architectural Theory Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 46–61, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1080/13264826.2013.785579.
[37]
R. Fardon, ‘Citations out of place, or, Lord Palmerston goes viral in the nineteenth century but gets lost in the twentieth’, Anthropology Today, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 25–27, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1111/1467-8322.12007.
[38]
Lydia Martens, ‘The visible and the invisible: (De)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices’, in Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination, London: I.B. Tauris, 2007, pp. 34–48 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma990020863730204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Dirt:%20new%20geographies%20of%20cleanliness%20and%20contamination&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9072258131107472785&offset=0
[39]
B. Campkin and R. Cox, ‘The visible and invisible: (de|)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices’, in Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination, London: I.B. Tauris, 2007, pp. 34–48.
[40]
Daniel Miller, ‘Behind closed doors’, in Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors, Oxford: Berg, 2001, pp. 1–19.
[41]
D. Miller, ‘Possessions’, in Home possessions : material culture behind closed doors, Oxford: Berg, 2001, pp. 107–121.
[42]
B. Penner, ‘(Re)Designing the "Unmentionable”: Female Toilets in the Twentieth Century from Ladies and Gents: Public Toilets and Gender’, in Ladies and gents: public toilets and gender, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2009, pp. 141–150 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14btdn9.14?seq=1
[43]
J. W. Riemer, ‘Varieties of Opportunistic Research’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 467–477, Jan. 1977, doi: 10.1177/089124167700500405.
[44]
K. Shonfield, ‘Glossing with graininess: cross occupations in postwar British film and architecture’, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 355–375, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1080/136023698374134.
[45]
Katherine Schonfield, ‘Dirt is matter out of place’, in Architecture: the subject is matter, London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 30–43.
[46]
E. Shove, ‘Constructing home: a crossroads of choice’, in At home: an anthropology of domestic space, vol. Space, place, and society, Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1999, pp. 130–143 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ea239597-a59f-ec11-a22a-0050f2f0d45d
[47]
H. K. Bhabha, ‘DissemiNation : time, narrative and the margins of the modern nation’, in The location of culture, London: Routledge, 2004, pp. 199–244.
[48]
Z. Celik, ‘Colonialism, Orientalism and the canon’, in Intersections : architectural histories and critical theories, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 161–169.
[49]
D. Chakrabarty, ‘Chapter 1: Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History’, in Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference, pp. 27–46 [Online]. Available: http://quod.lib.umich.edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb04798.0001.001;didno=heb04798.0001.001;view=image;seq=00000039;node=heb04798.0001.001%3A4.1
[50]
A. D. King, ‘Introduction to The bungalow : the production of a global culture’, in The bungalow : the production of a global culture, London: Routledge Kegan Paul, 1984, pp. 1–13 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=52345d44-3116-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[51]
E. W. Said, ‘Orientalism’, in The post-colonial studies reader, 2nd ed., London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 24–27.
[52]
G. C. Spivak, ‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in The post-colonial studies reader, 2nd ed., London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 28–37.
[53]
A. D. King, ‘Introduction’, in The bungalow : the production of a global culture, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984, pp. 1–13.
[54]
Stephen Cairns, ‘Chapter 3: The Stone Books of Orientalism’, in Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon, vol. The architext series, London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 51–65.
[55]
Çelik, Zeynep, Urban forms and colonial confrontations: Algiers under French rule. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/ws859g31f
[56]
M. Crinson, Modern architecture and the end of empire, vol. British art and visual culture since 1750, new readings. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.
[57]
M. Fraser and J. Kerr, Architecture and the ‘special relationship’: the American influence on post-war British architecture. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007.
[58]
F. Hernández, ‘The transcultural phenomenon, and the transculturation of architecture’, The Journal of Romance Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–15, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.3828/jrs.2.3.1.
[59]
F. Hernández, Bhabha for architects, vol. Thinkers for architects. London: Routledge, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203855935
[60]
Jyoti Hosagrahar, ‘’Interrogating Difference: Postcolonial Perspectives in Architecture and Urbanism’, in The SAGE handbook of architectural theory, Los Angeles: SAGE, 2012, pp. 70–84 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14424236330004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[61]
Nalbantoglu, Gülsüm Baydar and Wong, Chong Thai, Postcolonial space(s). New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1997.
[62]
Moore-Gilbert, B. J., Postcolonial theory: contexts, practices, politics. London: Verso, 1997.
[63]
A. D. King, ‘Actually existing postcolonialisms : colonial urbanism and architecture after the postcolonial turn’, in Postcolonial urbanism : Southeast Asian cities and global processes, London: Routledge, 2003, pp. 167–183.
[64]
King, Anthony D., Spaces of global cultures: architecture, urbanism, identity, vol. Architext series. London: Routledge, 2004.
[65]
A. Kusno, Behind the postcolonial: architecture, urban space, and political cultures in Indonesia, vol. Architext series. London: Routledge, 2000.
[66]
Said, Edward W., Orientalism, 1st Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books, 1979.
[67]
Said, Edward W., Culture and imperialism. London: Chatto and Windus, 1993.
[68]
P. Scriver and V. Prakash, Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon, vol. The architext series. London, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9780203964262
[69]
G. C. Spivak, A critique of postcolonial reason: toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
[70]
G. Wright, The politics of design in French colonial urbanism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
[71]
S. Ahmed, ‘Queer phenomenology: orientations, objects, others’, Durham, [N.C.]: Duke University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5021904050004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
[72]
K. Bermann, ‘The house behind’, in Places through the body, London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 165–180.
[73]
J. Butler, ‘Subjects of sex, gender, desire’, in Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity, 2nd ed., vol. Routledge classics, New York: Routledge, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8a0ef3d0-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[74]
K. Burns, ‘Ex libris: Archaeologies of Feminism, Architecture and Deconstruction’, Architectural Theory Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 242–265, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/13264826.2010.524706.
[75]
R. Mills, ‘Queer is Here? Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Histories and Public Culture’, History Workshop Journal, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 253–263, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1093/hwj/dbl006.
[76]
D. Petrescu, ‘Altering practices’, in Altering practices: feminist politics and poetics of space, London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 1–14 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8d9b88a5-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[77]
L. A. Brown, ‘Introduction’, in Feminist practices: interdisciplinary approaches to women in architecture, Farnham: Ashgate, 2011, pp. 1–15 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cadf895b-7b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[78]
Agrest, Diana, Conway, Patricia, and Weisman, Leslie, The sex of architecture. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1996.
[79]
D. Agrest, ‘Architecture from without: body logic and sex’, in Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996, pp. 541–553 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d085d5f0-5bab-ec11-a99b-0050f2f06092
[80]
A. Betsky, Queer space: architecture and same-sex desire. New York: William Morrow & Co, 1997.
[81]
K. Bonnevier, Behind straight curtains: towards a queer feminist theory of architecture. Stockholm: Axl Books, 2007.
[82]
B. Campkin and B. Pilkey, ‘Queering Home’, in Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches, London: Bloomsbury Aademic.
[83]
B. Campkin and B. Penner, ‘Beyond Home’, in Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
[84]
B. Campkin and J. Hunt, ‘Letters Home: Queer Domestic Politics Provoked by the Actions of Performance Artist Benjamin Sebastian’, in Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
[85]
D. Coleman, ‘Introduction from “Architecture and feminism”’, in Architecture and feminism, vol. Yale publications on architecture, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996, pp. ix–xvi.
[86]
M. L. Durning and R. Wrigley, Gender and architecture. Chichester: Wiley, 2000.
[87]
B. Colomina and J. Bloomer, Sexuality & space, vol. Princeton papers on architecture. New York, N.Y.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992.
[88]
Hayden, Dolores, The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1981.
[89]
Hughes, Francesca, The architect: reconstructing her practice. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996.
[90]
A. Jagose, Queer theory: an introduction. New York: New York University Press, 1996.
[91]
J. Rendell, ‘Subjective Space: an Architectural History of the Burlington Arcade’, in Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary, London: Black Dog Publishing, 1996, pp. 216–233.
[92]
Matrix (Organization), Making space: women and the man-made environment. London: Pluto Press, 1984.
[93]
R. Mills, ‘Theorizing the Queer Museum’, Museums & Social Issues, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–52, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1179/msi.2008.3.1.41.
[94]
B. Penner, ‘Researching female public toilets: gendered spaces, disciplinary limits’. [Online]. Available: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol6/iss2/6/
[95]
D. Petrescu, ‘Gardeners of commons, for the most part, women’, in Taylor & Francis eBooks - Relational Architectural Ecologies, pp. 261–276 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/ISBN/9780203770283
[96]
D. Petrescu, ‘Altering practices’, in Altering practices: feminist politics and poetics of space, London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 1–18 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8d9b88a5-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[97]
G. Pollock, ‘Excerpts from “Modernity and the Spaces of Femininity”’, in Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction, vol. Architext series, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 154–167.
[98]
P. Rawes, Irigaray for architects, vol. Thinkers for architects. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007.
[99]
J. Rendell, ‘Doing it, (Un)Doing it, (Over)Doing it Yourself: Rhetorics of Architectural Abuse’, in Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user, London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 229–246.
[100]
J. Rendell, ‘Introduction: Gender, Space, Architecture’, in Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction, vol. Architext series, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 225–239.
[101]
J. Rendell, The pursuit of pleasure: gender, space & architecture in Regency London. London: Athlone, 2002.
[102]
‘Tendencies and Trajectories: Feminist Approaches in Architecture : SAGE Knowledge’. [Online]. Available: http://knowledge.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/hdbk_architectheory/n6.xml
[103]
E. Kosofsky Sedgwick, ‘Shame, Theatricality, and Queer Performativity: Henry James’s The Art of the Novel’, in Touching feeling: affect, pedagogy, performativity, vol. Series Q, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2003, pp. 35–66.
[104]
M. Smith, ‘Queering the Historic Home: Using Contemporary Art to Reveal Britain’s Eighteenth and Twentieth Century Gay Histories’, in Sexuality at Home: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Approaches, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
[105]
H. Urbach, ‘Closets, clothes, disClosure’, in Gender space architecture : an interdisciplinary introduction, vol. Architext series, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 342–352.
[106]
L. Walker, ‘Women in architecture’, in Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction, vol. Architext series, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 244–257.
[107]
J. Wallach Scott, ‘Excerpts from “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis”’, in Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction, vol. Architext series, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 74–87.
[108]
M. Warner, The trouble with normal: sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
[109]
P. White, ‘Female Spectator, Lesbian Specter: The Haunting’, in Sexuality & space, vol. Princeton papers on architecture, New York, N.Y.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992.
[110]
R. J. Williams, Sex and buildings: modern architecture and the sexual revolution. London: Reaktion, 2013.
[111]
F. Guattari, ‘La Borde: a clinic unlike any other’, in Chaosophy: Texts and interview 1972-1977, Semiotext(e), 2007, pp. 176–194.
[112]
L. Holm, ‘Introduction: Vision and its doubles’, in Brunelleschi, Lacan, Le Corbusier: architecture, space and the construction of subjectivity, London: Routledge, 2010, pp. 1–18 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=778f581e-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[113]
S. Zizek, ‘The architectural parallax’, in The political unconscious of architecture: re-opening Jameson’s narrative, vol. Ashgate studies in architecture series, Farnham: Ashgate, 2011, pp. 253–295 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5def1c84-7b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[114]
Sigmund Freud, ‘Constructions in analysis’, in The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 23: (1937-1939), London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis, 1964, pp. 255–269 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=34633418-3816-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[115]
Blum, Virginia, ‘Psychotopologies: closing the circuit between psychic and material space’, Environment and Planning - Part D, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1030–1047, 1AD [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/d11910
[116]
V. Burgin, ‘Geometry and abjection’, in In/different spaces : place and memory in visual culture, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996, pp. 38–56.
[117]
V. Burgin, ‘Perverse Space’, in Sexuality & space, vol. Princeton papers on architecture, New York, N.Y.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992, pp. 219–240.
[118]
B. Burgoyne, ‘Autism and Topology’, in Drawing the soul: schemas and models in psychoanalysis, vol. Encyclopaedia of psychoanalysis, London: Karnac, 2003, pp. 198–212.
[119]
C. Castoriadis, ‘The psyche and the society anew’, in Figures of the Thinkable, pp. 353–377 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bbd727a0-6d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[120]
B. Colomina, ‘The Split Wall: Domestic Voyeurism’, in Sexuality & space, vol. Princeton papers on architecture, New York, N.Y.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992, pp. 73–128.
[121]
M. Cousins, ‘Where?’, in Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary, London: Black Dog Publishing, 1996, pp. 107–114.
[122]
S. Freud, ‘The Ego and the Id’. [Online]. Available: http://www.pep-web.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/document.php?id=se.019.0001a#p0048
[123]
S. Freud, ‘A Note on the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis’, in The essentials of psycho-analysis, vol. The International psycho-analytical library, London: Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1986, pp. 81–215.
[124]
S. Freud, ‘Instincts and their Vicissitudes’, in The essentials of psycho-analysis, vol. The International psycho-analytical library, London: Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1986, pp. 197–217.
[125]
L. Holm, ‘What Lacan said re: architecture’, Critical Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 29–64, Jul. 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-8705.00286.
[126]
E. A. Grosz, ‘Space, time, and bodies’, in Space, time, and perversion : essays on the politics of bodies, London: Routledge, 1995, pp. 83–87.
[127]
J. Lacan, J.-A. Miller, A. Sheridan, and D. Macey, The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. London: Vintage, 1998.
[128]
L. Mulvey, ‘Pandora: topographies of the mask and curiosity’, in Sexuality & space, vol. Princeton papers on architecture, New York, N.Y.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992, pp. 53–71.
[129]
Laura Mulvey, ‘Cinematic Space: Desiring and Deciphering’, in Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary, London: Black Dog Publishing, 1996.
[130]
S. Pile, The body and the city: psychoanalysis, space and subjectivity. London: Routledge, 1996.
[131]
J. Rendell, ‘The Transitional Space of the Social Condensor’, in Architecture as Cultural Artefact, London: Routledge, 2012.
[132]
H. Heynen, ‘Architecture as critique of modernity’, in Architecture and modernity: a critique, Cambridge, Mass: MIT, 1999, pp. 148, 249–218,258 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=04f14145-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[133]
M. Tafuri, ‘Reason’s adventures: naturalism and the city in the century of the enlightenment’, in Architecture and utopia: design and capitalist development, Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1976, pp. 1–40 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=26d56ebf-705b-ee11-830d-0050f2f05a7b
[134]
F. Jameson, ‘Architecture and the critique of ideology’, in Architecture, criticism, ideology, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1985, pp. 51–87 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=78f6c13f-7636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[135]
Stanford Anderson, ‘Quasi-Autonomy in Architecture: The Search for an “In-Between”’, Perspecta, vol. 33, pp. 30–37, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1567294?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[136]
P. V. Aureli and Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture, The project of autonomy: politics and architecture within and against capitalism, vol. FORuM project. New York: Princeton Architectural, 2008.
[137]
G. Baird, ‘“Criticality” and its discontents’. [Online]. Available: http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/21/criticality-and-its-discontents
[138]
A. Colquhoun, Essays in architectural criticism: modern architecture and historical change. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1981.
[139]
P. Eisenman, ‘Autonomy and the Will to the Critical’, Written into the void: selected writings, 1990-2004, pp. 94–99, 2007.
[140]
K. Michael Hays, ‘Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form’, Perspecta, vol. 21, pp. 14–29, 1984 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1567078?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[141]
K. M. Hays, Architecture’s desire: reading the late avant-garde, vol. Writing architecture series. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2010.
[142]
H. Heynen, ‘What belongs to architecture?’ Avant-garde ideas in the modern movement’, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 129–147, Jan. 1999, doi: 10.1080/136023699373882.
[143]
H. Heynen, ‘About histories and theory’, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 205–220, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1080/13602360210153656.
[144]
F. Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso, 1991.
[145]
F. Jameson, ‘The Brick and the Balloon: Architecture, Idealism and Land Speculation’, New Left Review, no. 228, pp. 25–46 [Online]. Available: http://newleftreview.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/I/228/fredric-jameson-the-brick-and-the-balloon-architecture-idealism-and-land-speculation
[146]
N. Lahiji, The political unconscious of architecture: re-opening Jameson’s narrative, vol. Ashgate studies in architecture series. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.
[147]
R. Martin, ‘Utopia’s Ghost: Architecture and Postmondernism’. [Online]. Available: https://muse-jhu-edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/9780816673698
[148]
Kate Nesbitt, ‘The Sublime and Modern Architecture: Unmasking (An Aesthetic of) Abstraction’, New Literary History, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20057270?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[149]
R. Maxwell, Reckoning with Colin Rowe: ten architects take position. New York, NY: Routledge, 2015.
[150]
J. Rendell, Critical architecture, vol. Critiques. London: Routledge, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945667
[151]
M. Tafuri, ‘Toward a Critique of Architectural Ideology’, Architecture theory since 1968, pp. 28–33, 1998.
[152]
E. Wolfflin, ‘Renaissance and Baroque - Parts I and II’, in Renaissance and Baroque, vol. Cornell paperbacks, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967, pp. 29–88.
[153]
R. Stern, ‘The Doubles of Post-Modern’, The Harvard Architectural Review, no. 1, 1984.
[154]
K. Lloyd Thomas, ‘Between the womb and the world: building matrixial relations in the NICU’, in Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity, London: Routledge, 2013, pp. 192–208 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e9b9167b-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[155]
S. Giedion, ‘The Assembly Line and Scientific Management’, in Mechanization takes command: a contribution to anonymous history, pp. 79–121 [Online]. Available: https://www-fulcrum-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/concern/monographs/3484zh00p
[156]
B. Latour, ‘Crisis’, in We have never been modern, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1993, pp. 1–12 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d8c3609d-6036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[157]
B. Allen, ‘The Technical’, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7v967.6
[158]
B. Allen, ‘Technology’ [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7v967.8
[159]
K. Bijsterveld, ‘Infernal din, heavenly tunes : repertoires of dramatizing sound’, in Mechanical sound : technology, culture, and public problems of noise in the twentieth century, vol. Inside technology, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008, pp. 27–51.
[160]
M. Bressani, ‘Viollet-le-Ducs’s optic’, in Architecture and the sciences : exchanging metaphors, 1st ed., vol. Princeton papers on architecture, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University School of Architecture, 2003, pp. 119–139.
[161]
N. Brown, ‘Immortality by Design’, Parallax, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 4–20, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1080/13534640802159096.
[162]
Mario Carpo, ‘Drawing with Numbers: Geometry and Numeracy in Early Modern Architectural Design’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 448–469, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592497
[163]
A. Feenberg, ‘Technology, philosophy, politics’, in Questioning technology, London: Routledge, 1999, pp. 1–17.
[164]
Galison, Peter, 1955-; Thompson, Emily Ann., The architecture of science. MIT Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://quod.lib.umich.edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb08330.0001.001
[165]
W. Benjamin, ‘The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction’, in Illuminations, Pimlico ed., London: Pimlico, 1999, pp. 211–235.
[166]
Arie Graafland and Heidi Sohn, ‘Introduction: Science and virtuality’, in The SAGE handbook of architectural theory, Los Angeles: SAGE, 2012, pp. 467–483 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14424236330004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[167]
M. Heidegger, ‘The question concerning technology’, in The question concerning technology, and other essays, vol. Harper torchbooks, London: Harper & Row, 1977, pp. 3–35.
[168]
Sanford Kwinter, ‘The “avant-garde” in America (or The fallacy of misplaced concreteness)’, in Far from equilibrium: essays on technology and design culture, Barcelona: Actar-D, pp. 74–89 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1ad6bd5d-2f16-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[169]
K. Lloyd Thomas, ‘Material Matters’. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/ISBN/9780203013625
[170]
M. Serres and B. Latour, ‘First conversation : background and training’, in Conversations on science, culture, and time, vol. Studies in literature and science, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995, pp. 1–42.
[171]
Stiegler, Bernard, Technics and time: 1: The fault of Epimetheus, vol. Meridian. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1998.
[172]
Virilio, Paul and Rose, Julie, Open sky. London: Verso, 1997.
[173]
Paul Virilio, ‘The Third Interval’, in Re-think-ing tech-nol-ogy: a reader in architectural theory, London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 375–383.
[174]
R. Braidotti, Transpositions: on nomadic ethics. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.
[175]
D. J. Haraway, The Haraway reader. New York: Routledge, 2004.
[176]
S. Plant, Zeros + ones: women, cyberspace + the new technoculture. London: Fourth Estate, 1997.
[177]
P. Rawes, ‘Chapter 7 Bridges, Envelopes and Horizons’, in Irigaray for architects, vol. Thinkers for architects, Abingdon: Routledge, 2007, pp. 75–88 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3d7c94cd-fea8-ec11-a99b-0050f2f06092
[178]
M. Foucault and M. Senellart, ‘Course Summary and context from The birth of biopolitics’, in The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979, vol. Michel Foucault : lectures at the Collège de France, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, pp. 317–331 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=559abeef-7936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[179]
Thomas Lemke, ‘The government of living beings: Michel Foucault’, in Biopolitics: an Advanced Introduction, vol. Biopolitics: Medicine, Technoscience, and Health in the Twenty-first Century, New York: NYU Press, 2011, pp. 33–52 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/book/11107
[180]
S.-O. Wallenstein, ‘Chapters starting with Introduction, The notion of biopolitics and the emergence of man [etc]’, in Biopolitics and the emergence of modern architecture, vol. FORuM project, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2009, pp. 4–48 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c0e48028-7e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[181]
M. Foucault, ‘Ch. 5: Lecture 8 February 1978 from Security, Territory, Population’, in Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 115–130 [Online]. Available: https://r4.vlereader.com/Reader?ean=9780230245075
[182]
Michel Foucault, ‘Course context: Commentary from Security, Territory, Population’:, in Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 369–401 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780230245075
[183]
M. Foucault, ‘Ch. 13: Lecture 5 April 1978 from Security, Territory, Population’, in Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 333–358 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14703984000004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[184]
Agamben, Giorgio, Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life, vol. Meridian. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1998.
[185]
Bennett, Jane, Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1215/9780822391623
[186]
Butler, Judith, Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso, 2004.
[187]
R. Braidotti, ‘Posthuman Relational Subjectivity’, in Taylor & Francis eBooks - Relational Architectural Ecologies, pp. 21–39 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/ISBN/9780203770283
[188]
D. Hauptmann and W. Neidich, ‘Introduction: Architecture and mind in the age of communication and information’, in Cognitive architecture: from biopolitics to noopolitics : architecture & mind in the age of communication and information, vol. Delft School of Design series on architecture and urbanism, Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2010, pp. 10–43.
[189]
Campbell, Timothy C., Improper life: technology and biopolitics from Heidegger to Agamben, vol. Posthumanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttth0h
[190]
P. Clough and C. Willse, Beyond Biopolitics: Essays on Governance of Life and Death. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://read.dukeupress.edu/content/beyond-biopolitics
[191]
M. Foucault, P. H. Hutton, L. H. Martin, and H. Gutman, Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock, 1988.
[192]
Nathan Moore, ‘Diagramming control’, in Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity, London: Routledge, 2013, pp. 56–70 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781135037222
[193]
Rose, Nikolas S., Politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rqmf
[194]
Bourriaud, Nicolas, A precarious existence: vulnerability in the public domain, vol. Open. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers, 2009.
