1
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.
2
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods, and practice. Seventh edition. London: : Thames & Hudson 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=6178544
3
Caple, Chris. Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past. London: : Routledge 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203409060
4
Carver, M. O. H. Archaeological investigation. London: : Routledge 2009.
5
Carver M. Resources: Archaeological Investigation. Routledge Resources for Archaeology. http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/resourcesforarchaeology/resources_archaeological_investigation.asp
6
Edmonds, M. R. Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: : Batsford 1995.
7
Greene, Kevin, Moore, Tom. Archaeology: an introduction. 5th ed. London: : Routledge 2010. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203835975
8
Henderson, Julian. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: : Routledge 2000.
9
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
10
Renfrew, Colin, Bahn, Paul G. Archaeology: the key concepts. London: : Routledge 2005. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203491096
11
Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral archaeology: first principles. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995.
12
Schiffer, Michael B. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987.
13
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.
14
Binford LR. A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity 1964;29:425–41.http://www.jstor.org/stable/277978
15
Childe VG. Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1956.
16
Lamotta V, Schiffer M. Archaeological formation processes. In: Archaeology: the key concepts. London: : Routledge 2005. 121–7.https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203491096
17
Lucas G. Splitting objects. In: Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London: : Routledge 2001. 64–106.https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203132258
18
Miksicek CH. Formation Processes of the Archaeobotanical Record. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1987;10:211–47.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20210089
19
Schiffer MB. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987.
20
Stein JK. A review of site formation processes and their relevance to geoarchaeology. In: Earth sciences and archaeology. New York: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2001. 37–51.
21
van der Leeuw SE. Dust to Dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: : Universiteit van Amsterdam 1984. 709–73.
22
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.
23
Binford LR. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’. Journal of Anthropological Research 1981;37:195–208.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
24
Richard Bradley. The Destruction of Wealth in Later Prehistory. Man 1982;17:108–22.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2802104
25
Brain CK. The hunters or the hunted?: An introduction to African cave taphonomy. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1980.
26
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;2:117–63. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
27
Hill JD. Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: : Tempus Reparatum 1995.
28
LaMotta VM, Schiffer B. Formation processes of housefloor assemblages. In: Allison PM, ed. The archaeology of household activities. London: : Routledge 1999. 19–29.https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203014929
29
Lucas G. Eventful contexts. In: Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London: : Routledge 2001. 146–99.https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203132258
30
Schiffer MB. Behavioral chain analysis: activities, organization and the use of space. In: Behavioral archaeology: first principles. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995. 55–66.
31
Schiffer MB. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity 1972;37:156–65.http://www.jstor.org/stable/278203
32
Schiffer MB. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987.
33
Carver MOH. Archaeological investigation. London: : Routledge 2009.
34
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.
35
Carver MOH. The nature of urban deposits. In: Urban archaeology in Britain. London: : Council for British Archaeology 1987. 9–26.http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr61.cfm
36
Carver MOH. Underneath English towns: interpreting urban archaeology. London: : B.T. Batsford 1987.
37
Drewett P, Ellison AB, Cartwright CR, et al. Later Bronze Age Downland Economy and Excavations at Black Patch, East Sussex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1982;48:321–400. doi:10.1017/S0079497X00008434
38
Gardner A. Time and empire in the Roman world. Journal of Social Archaeology 2012;12:145–66. doi:10.1177/1469605312439971
39
Greig J. The interpretation of pollen spectra from urban deposits. In: Environmental archaeology in the urban context. London: : Council for British Archaeology 1982. 47–65.http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr43.cfm
40
Lucas G. Eventful contexts. In: Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London: : Routledge 2001. 146–99.https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203132258
41
Parker Pearson, Michael. The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: : Sutton 1999.
42
Lock G, Harris T. Visualising spatial data: the importance of Geographic Information Systems. In: Archaeology and the information age: a global perspective. London: : Routledge 1992. 80–96.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f700f2c6-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
43
Vita-Finzi C, Higgs ES, Sturdy D, et al. Prehistoric Economy in the Mount Carmel Area of Palestine: Site Catchment Analysis. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1970;36:1–37. doi:10.1017/S0079497X00013074
44
Bevan A. Spatial methods for analysing large-scale artefact inventories. Antiquity 2012;86:492–506.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1021249050?accountid=14511
45
Binford LR. People in their lifespace. In: In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record : with a new afterword. Berkeley, CA: : University of California Press 2002.
46
Hodder I. Locational models and the study of Romano-British settlement. In: Models in archaeology. London: : Methuen 1972. 887–909.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f662ae83-5636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
47
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.
48
Hirsch, Eric, O’Hanlon, Michael. The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1995.
49
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, et al. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology 2006;9:31–71. doi:10.1177/1461957107077704
50
Tilley C. Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology. In: Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2008. 271–6.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70496.pdf
51
Bender, Barbara. Landscape: politics and perspectives. New York: : Berg 1993.
52
Barbara Bender. Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscapes of Stonehenge. Man 1992;27:735–55.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2804172
53
Bender et al. B. Methodologies. In: Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007. 50–75.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70497.pdf
54
Cosgrove D. Geography is everywhere: culture and symbolism in human landscapes. In: Horizons in human geography. Basingstoke: : Macmillan Education 1989. 118–35.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70498.pdf
55
Hamilton S, Seager Thomas M, Whitehouse R. Say it with stone: constructing with stones on Easter Island. World Archaeology 2011;43:167–90. doi:10.1080/00438243.2011.586273
56
Hamilton S, Harrison S, Bender B. Conflicting imaginations: Archaeology, anthropology and geomorphology on Leskernick Hill, Bodmin Moor, southwest Britain. Geoforum 2008;39:602–15. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.025
57
Morphy H. Landscape and the reproduction of the ancestral past. In: The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1995. 184–209.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70499.pdf
58
Tilley CY. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In: A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: : Berg 1994. 7–34.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70500.pdf
59
Christopher Tilley. The Powers of Rocks: Topography and Monument Construction on Bodmin Moor. World Archaeology 1996;28:161–76.http://www.jstor.org/stable/125068
60
Parker Pearson M, Ramiiisonina. Stonehenge for the Ancestors: the stones pass on the message. Antiquity 1998;72:308–26.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217551333?accountid=14511
61
Renfrew, Colin, Bahn, Paul G. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.
62
David N, Kramer C. Studying artifacts: functions, operating sequences, taxonomy. In: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. 138–67.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG1016_70501.pdf
63
DeBoer W, Lathrap D. The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics. In: Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. New York: : Columbia University Press 1979. 102–38.
64
Ferguson, Jeffrey R. Designing experimental research in archaeology: examining technology through production and use. Boulder, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 2010.
65
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;2:117–63. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
66
Hodder, Ian. The present past: an introduction to anthropology for archaeologists. London: : Batsford 1982.
67
Millson, Dana C. E., Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). Experimentation and interpretation: the use of experimental archaeology in the study of the past. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2011.
68
Peacock, D. P. S. Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. London: : Longman 1982.
69
Reynolds PJ. The nature of experiment in archaeology. In: Experiment and design: archaeological studies in honour of John Coles. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 1999. 156–62.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1007_59088.pdf
70
Saraydar, Stephen C. Replicating the past: the art and science of the archaeological experiment. Long Grove, Ill: : Waveland Press 2008.
71
Michael Brian Schiffer and James M. Skibo. The Explanation of Artifact Variability. American Antiquity 1997;62:27–50.http://www.jstor.org/stable/282378
72
Shimada I. Experimental archaeology. In: Handbook of archaeological methods. Lanham, Md: : Altamira Press 2005. 603–42.
73
Jean-Pierre Protzen. Inca Quarrying and Stonecutting. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1985;44:161–82.http://www.jstor.org/stable/990027
74
Bell M, Fowler PJ, Hillson S, et al. The experimental earthwork project, 1960-1992. York: : Council for British Archaeology 1996. http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr100.cfm
75
Bradley R. The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: : Routledge 1998.
76
Jewell PA, Dimbleby GW. The experimental earthwork on Overton Down, Wiltshire, England: the first four years. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1966;32:313–42.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00014420
77
Ogburn D. Power in Stone: The Long-Distance Movement of Building Blocks in the Inca Empire. Ethnohistory 2004;51:101–35.http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ethnohistory/v051/51.1ogburn.html
78
Parker Pearson M, Ramiiisonina. Stonehenge for the Ancestors: the stones pass on the message. Antiquity 1998;72:308–26.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217551333?accountid=14511
79
Sillar B. The building and rebuilding of walls: Aspirations, commitments and tensions within an Andean community and the archaeological monument they inhabit. Journal of Material Culture 2013;18:27–51. doi:10.1177/1359183512473558
80
Peacock DPS. Neolithic pottery production in Cornwall. Antiquity 1969;43:145–9.http://antiquity.ac.uk/Ant/043/0137/Ant0430137.pdf
81
Bowman S. Tracing to Source. In: Science and the past. London: : British Museum Press 1991. 99–116.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=23c734a4-6336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
82
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.
83
Blomster et al. JP. Olmec Pottery Production and Export in Ancient Mexico Determined Through Elemental Analysis. Science 2005;307:1068–72. doi:10.1126/science.1107599
84
Henderson, Julian. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: : Routledge 2000.
85
Thomas HH. The source of the stones of Stonehenge. Antiquaries Journal 1923;3:239–60. doi:10.1017/S0003581500005096
86
Tykot RH. Archaeological provenance studies. In: Martini et al. M, ed. Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2004. 407–32.
87
Wilson L, Pollard AM. The provenance hypothesis. In: Brothwell DR, Pollard AM, eds. Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: : John Wiley 2001. 507–17.
88
Greene K, Moore T. Dating the past. In: Archaeology: an introduction. London: : Routledge 2010. 148–89.https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203835975
89
Renfrew C. When? Dating Methods and Chronology. In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008. 121–74.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_69038
90
Dee M, Wengrow D, Shortland A, et al. An absolute chronology for early Egypt using radiocarbon dating and Bayesian statistical modelling. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2013;469:20130395–20130395. doi:10.1098/rspa.2013.0395
91
Darvill et al. T. Stonehenge remodelled. Antiquity 2012;86:1021–40. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00048225
92
Adams WY. Archaeological classification: theory versus practice. Antiquity 1988;62:40–56.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293842480?accountid=14511
93
Aitken MJ. Science-based dating in archaeology. London: : Longman 1990.
94
Lowe, J. J., Walker, M. J. C. Reconstructing Quaternary environments. 2nd ed. Harlow: : Prentice Hall 1997.
95
Bailey G. Concepts, time-scales and explanations in economic prehistory. In: Economic archaeology: towards an integration of ecological and social approaches. Oxford: : British Archaeological Reports 1981. 97–117.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2cbede4-7236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
96
Lucas, Gavin. The archaeology of time. London: : Routledge 2005.
97
Plog S, Hantman JL. Chronology Construction and the Study of Prehistoric Culture Change. Journal of Field Archaeology 1990;17:439–56. doi:10.2307/530005
98
Smart, Peter, Frances, Peter D., Quaternary Research Association (Great Britain). Quaternary dating methods: a user’s guide. Cambridge: : Quaternary Research Association 1991.
99
Taylor RE, Aitken MJ. Chronometric dating in archaeology. New York: : Plenum Press 1997.
100
Sillar B, Tite MS. The challenge of ‘technological choices’ for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry 2000;42:2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x
101
Renfrew C, Bahn P. How did they make and use tools technology. In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008. 317–56.
102
Barnett, William, Hoopes, John W. The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies. Washington [D.C.]: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1995.
103
Cathy Lynne Costin. Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production. Archaeological Method and Theory 1991;3:1–56.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170212
104
Kingery, W. D. Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Washington, D.C.: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1996.
105
Lemonnier, Pierre. Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: : Routledge 1993.
106
Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1986;5:147–86. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7
107
Lemonnier, Pierre. Elements for an anthropology of technology. Ann Arbor, Mich: : Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 1992.
108
Schlanger N. Mindful technology: unleasing the chaine operatoire for an archaeology of the mind. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 143–51.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70505.pdf
109
Sigaut F. Technology. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 420–59.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70506.pdf
110
Edmonds MR. Squeezing blood from stones. In: Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: : Batsford 1995. 9–19.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_69042
111
Whittaker JC. A brief history of flintknapping. In: Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1994. 23–63.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_69043
112
Binford L. The challenge of the Mousterian. In: In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record : with a new afterword. Berkeley, CA: : University of California Press 2002. 79–94.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70507.pdf
113
Edmonds, M. R. Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: : Batsford 1995.
114
Holdaway S, Stern N. A record in stone: the study of Australia’s flaked stone artefacts. Canberra: : Aboriginal Studies Press 2004.
115
Inizan M-L, Féblot-Augustins J, Cercle de Recherches et d’Etude Préhistoriques. Technology and terminology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary Arabic, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish. Nanterre: : CREP 1999.
116
Odell GH. Tool function. In: Lithic analysis. New York: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2004. 135–74.
117
Pigeot N. Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian Etiolles. Archaeological review from Cambridge 1990;9:126–41.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70508.pdf
118
Schick, Kathy Diane, Toth, Nicholas Patrick. Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. London: : Phoenix 1995.
119
Torrence R. The obsidian quarries and their use. In: An Island polity: the archaeology of exploitation in Melos. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982. 193–221.
120
Renfrew C. Trade as Action at a Distance: Questions of Integration and Communication. In: Ancient civilization and trade. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 1975. 3–59.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ca1eda40-7036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
121
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. What contact did the have? In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008. 347–80.
122
Appadurai A. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. 3–63.
123
Bradley, Richard, Edmonds, M. R. Interpreting the axe trade: production and exchange in Neolithic Britain. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
124
Graham E. Resource Diversity in Belize and Its Implications for Models of Lowland Trade. American Antiquity 1987;52:753–67.http://www.jstor.org/stable/281383
125
Gregory CA. Exchange and reciprocity. In: Ingold T, ed. Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 911–33.
126
Peacock DPS, Williams DF. Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductory guide. London: : Longman 1986.
127
Perles C. Systems of Exchange and Organization of Production in Neolithic Greece. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 1992;5:115–64. doi:10.1558/jmea.v5i2.115
128
Woolf G. World-systems analysis and the Roman Empire. Journal of Roman archaeology 1990;3:44–58.
129
M. S. Tite. Pottery Production, Distribution, and Consumption: The Contribution of the Physical Sciences. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1999;6:181–233.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177403
130
Van Der Leeuw SE. Dust to Dust: A transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: : Universiteit van Amsterdam 1984. 709–73.
131
Arnold, Dean E. Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
132
Barnett, William, Hoopes, John W. The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies. Washington [D.C.]: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1995.
133
Freestone, Ian, Gaimster, David R. M. Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions. London: : British Museum Press 1997.
134
Henderson J. Ceramics. In: The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: : Routledge 2000. 109–207.
135
Orton C. The potential of pottery as archaeological evidence. In: Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. 23–35.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70518.pdf
136
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987.
137
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 2. Composition, Production, and Theory. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:165–202.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053131
138
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: : Taraxacum 1981.
139
Skibo, James M., Feinman, Gary M. Pottery and people: a dynamic interaction. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1999.
140
Tyers, Paul. Roman pottery in Britain. London: : Batsford 1996.
141
Richard Bradley. The Destruction of Wealth in Later Prehistory. Man 1982;17:108–22.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2802104
142
Chapman J. Fragmentation in archaeology: people, places, and broken objects in the prehistory of south-eastern Europe. London: : Routledge 2000.
143
Corbey R, Layton R, Tanner JT. Archaeology and Art. In: A companion to archaeology. Malden, MA: : Blackwell 2004. 357–79.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470998618
144
Deal M. Household pottery disposal in the Maya highlands: An ethnoarchaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1985;4:243–91. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(85)90008-X
145
Deal M, Hagstrum B. Ceramic reuse behavior among the Maya and Wanka: Implications for Archaeology. In: Expanding archaeology. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995. 111–25.
146
Graham E. Control without Controlling. In: Motul de San José: politics, history, and economy in a classic Maya polity. Gainesville: : University Press of Florida 2012. 419–30.
147
Hodder I, World Archaeological Congress. The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: : Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic 1989.
148
Hodder I. The Decoration of Containers: An Ethnographic and Historical Study. In: Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Tucson: : University of Arizona Press 1991. 71–94.
149
Kopytoff I. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. 64–94.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f60c4109-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
150
Parker Pearson M. Status, rank and power. In: The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: : Sutton 1999. 72–94.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c28d105b-6936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
151
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. How were societies organized? In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008. 169–222.
152
Sackett JR. Style and Ethnicity in the Kalahari: A Reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity 1985;50:154–9.http://www.jstor.org/stable/280642
153
Shennan S. Introduction: Archaeological approaches to cultural identity. In: Archaeological approaches to cultural identity. London: : Routledge 1994. 1–32.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=536ec789-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
154
Is there a Place for Aesthetics in Archaeology? Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1994;4:249–69. doi:10.1017/S0959774300001098
155
Wiessner P. Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points. American Antiquity 1983;48:253–76.http://www.jstor.org/stable/280450
156
Wobst HM. Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In: For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin. Ann Arbor: : Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 1977. 317–42.
157
J. Bayley et al., English Heritage. Archaeometallurgy. Centre for Archaeology Guidelines. Swindon: : English Heritage 2001. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/archaeometallurgy/
158
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. How did they make and use tools technology. In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008. 317–56.
159
Bayley, J., Crossley, David W., Ponting, Matthew. Metals and metalworking: a research framework for archaeometallurgy. London: : Historical Metallurgy Society 2008. http://hist-met.org/publications/hms-occasional-publications.html
160
Cleere H. Ironmaking in the economy of the ancient world: the potential of archaeometallurgy. In: Scott et al. BG, ed. The Crafts of the blacksmith. Belfast?]: : UISPP Comité pour la Sidérurgie Ancienne and the Ulster Museum 1986. 1–6.
161
Craddock PT. Mining and smelting in Antiquity. In: Bowman S, ed. Science and the past. London: : British Museum Press 1991. 57–73.
162
Craddock PT. Early metal mining and production. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1995.
163
Rehren TH, Pernicka E. Coins, artefacts and isotopes - archaeometallurgy and archaeometry. Archaeometry 2008;50:232–48. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00389.x
164
Tylecote RF. The early history of metallurgy in Europe. London: : Longman 1987.
165
Lambert JB. Metals. In: Traces of the past: unraveling the secrets of archaeology through chemistry. Cambridge, Mass: : Perseus 1997. 168–213.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70524.pdf
166
Cronyn JM. Introducing archaeological conservation. In: The elements of archaeological conservation. London: : Routledge 1990. 1–13.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3225f62f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
167
Cronyn JM. Agents of Deterioration and Preservation. In: The elements of archaeological conservation. London: : Routledge 1990. 14–42.
168
Jones S, Holden J. It’s a material world: caring for the public realm. London: : Demos 2008.
169
Buttler CJ, Davis M, National Museum Wales. Things fall apart--: museum conservation in practice. Cardiff: : National Museum Wales Books 2006.
170
Pye, Elizabeth. Caring for the past: issues in conservation for archaeology and museums. London: : James & James 2001.
171
Sease C. A conservation manual for the field archaeologist. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: : Institute of Archaeology, University of California 1994. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8ft6488x?query=sease#page-1
172
Watkinson, David, Neal, Virginia, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, et al. First aid for finds. 3rd ed. Hertford: : RESCUE - The British Archaeological Trust; Archaeology Section of the UKIC; The Museum of London 1998.
173
Barber, E. J. W. Prehistoric textiles: the development of cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with special reference to the Aegean. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1991.
174
Elizabeth M. Brumfiel. The Quality of Tribute Cloth: The Place of Evidence in Archaeological Argument. American Antiquity 1996;61:453–62.http://www.jstor.org/stable/281834
175
Davis, Simon J. M. The archaeology of animals. London: : Batsford 1987.
176
Dijkman, W., Ervynck, A. Antler, bone, horn, ivory and teeth: the use of animal skeletal materials in Roman and early medieval Maastricht. Maastricht: : Archaeology Section, Department of Urban Development and Ground Maintenance, Municipality of Maastricht in collaboration with the Institute for the Archaeological Heritage of the Flemish Community 1998.
177
McCorriston J. The Fibre Revolution. Textile Extensification, Alienation, and Social Stratification in Ancient Mesopotamia. Current Anthropology 1997;38:517–35. doi:10.1086/204643
178
Mc Donnell JG. Pyrotechnology. In: Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: : John Wiley 2001. 493–312.
179
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.
180
Sillar B. Dung by preference: The choice of fuel as an example of how Andean pottery production is embedded within wider technical, social, and economic practices. Archaeometry 2000;42:43–60. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00865.x
181
Wild, John Peter. Textiles in archaeology. Princes Risborough: : Shire 1988.
