1.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
2.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods, and practice [Internet]. Seventh edition. London: Thames & Hudson; 2016. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=6178544
3.
Caple, Chris. Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2006. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203409060
4.
Carver, M. O. H. Archaeological investigation. London: Routledge; 2009.
5.
Carver M. Resources: Archaeological Investigation [Internet]. Routledge Resources for Archaeology. London: Taylor and Francis; Available from: http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/resourcesforarchaeology/resources_archaeological_investigation.asp
6.
Edmonds, M. R. Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: Batsford; 1995.
7.
Greene, Kevin, Moore, Tom. Archaeology: an introduction [Internet]. 5th ed. London: Routledge; 2010. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203835975
8.
Henderson, Julian. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: Routledge; 2000.
9.
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in archaeology. Vol. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
10.
Renfrew, Colin, Bahn, Paul G. Archaeology: the key concepts [Internet]. Vol. [Routledge key guides]. London: Routledge; 2005. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203491096
11.
Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral archaeology: first principles. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1995.
12.
Schiffer, Michael B. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press; 1987.
13.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
14.
Binford LR. A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity [Internet]. 1964;29(4):425–41. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/277978
15.
Childe VG. Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1956.
16.
Lamotta V, Schiffer M. Archaeological formation processes. In: Archaeology: the key concepts [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2005. p. 121–7. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203491096
17.
Lucas G. Splitting objects. In: Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2001. p. 64–106. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203132258
18.
Miksicek CH. Formation Processes of the Archaeobotanical Record. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 1987;10:211–47. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20210089
19.
Schiffer MB. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press; 1987.
20.
Stein JK. A review of site formation processes and their relevance to geoarchaeology. In: Earth sciences and archaeology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2001. p. 37–51.
21.
van der Leeuw SE. Dust to Dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam; 1984. p. 709–73.
22.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
23.
Binford LR. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’. Journal of Anthropological Research [Internet]. 1981;37(3):195–208. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
24.
Richard Bradley. The Destruction of Wealth in Later Prehistory. Man [Internet]. 1982;17(1):108–22. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2802104
25.
Brain CK. The hunters or the hunted?: An introduction to African cave taphonomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980.
26.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2(2):117–63.
27.
Hill JD. Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Vol. BAR British series. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum; 1995.
28.
LaMotta VM, Schiffer B. Formation processes of housefloor assemblages. In: Allison PM, editor. The archaeology of household activities [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 19–29. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203014929
29.
Lucas G. Eventful contexts. In: Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2001. p. 146–99. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203132258
30.
Schiffer MB. Behavioral chain analysis: activities, organization and the use of space. In: Behavioral archaeology: first principles. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1995. p. 55–66.
31.
Schiffer MB. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity [Internet]. 1972;37(2):156–65. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/278203
32.
Schiffer MB. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press; 1987.
33.
Carver MOH. Archaeological investigation. London: Routledge; 2009.
34.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
35.
Carver MOH. The nature of urban deposits. In: Urban archaeology in Britain [Internet]. London: Council for British Archaeology; 1987. p. 9–26. Available from: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr61.cfm
36.
Carver MOH. Underneath English towns: interpreting urban archaeology. London: B.T. Batsford; 1987.
37.
Drewett P, Ellison AB, Cartwright CR, Hinton P, O’Connor TP. Later Bronze Age Downland Economy and Excavations at Black Patch, East Sussex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1982;48:321–400.
38.
Gardner A. Time and empire in the Roman world. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2012 Jun 1;12(2):145–66.
39.
Greig J. The interpretation of pollen spectra from urban deposits. In: Environmental archaeology in the urban context [Internet]. London: Council for British Archaeology; 1982. p. 47–65. Available from: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr43.cfm
40.
Lucas G. Eventful contexts. In: Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2001. p. 146–99. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203132258
41.
Parker Pearson, Michael. The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: Sutton; 1999.
42.
Lock G, Harris T. Visualising spatial data: the importance of Geographic Information Systems. In: Archaeology and the information age: a global perspective [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 80–96. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f700f2c6-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
43.
Vita-Finzi C, Higgs ES, Sturdy D, Harriss J, Legge AJ, Tippett H. Prehistoric Economy in the Mount Carmel Area of Palestine: Site Catchment Analysis. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1970;36:1–37.
44.
Bevan A. Spatial methods for analysing large-scale artefact inventories. Antiquity [Internet]. 2012;86(332):492–506. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1021249050?accountid=14511
45.
Binford LR. People in their lifespace. In: In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record : with a new afterword. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2002.
46.
Hodder I. Locational models and the study of Romano-British settlement. In: Models in archaeology [Internet]. London: Methuen; 1972. p. 887–909. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f662ae83-5636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
47.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
48.
Hirsch, Eric, O’Hanlon, Michael. The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space. Vol. Oxford studies in social and cultural anthropology. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1995.
49.
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, Combes P, Herring E, Thomas MS. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology. 2006;9(1):31–71.
50.
Tilley C. Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology. In: Handbook of landscape archaeology [Internet]. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2008. p. 271–6. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70496.pdf
51.
Bender, Barbara. Landscape: politics and perspectives. Vol. Explorations in anthropology. New York: Berg; 1993.
52.
Barbara Bender. Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscapes of Stonehenge. Man [Internet]. 1992;27(4):735–55. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2804172
53.
Bender et al. B. Methodologies. In: Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology [Internet]. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2007. p. 50–75. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70497.pdf
54.
Cosgrove D. Geography is everywhere: culture and symbolism in human landscapes. In: Horizons in human geography [Internet]. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education; 1989. p. 118–35. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70498.pdf
55.
Hamilton S, Seager Thomas M, Whitehouse R. Say it with stone: constructing with stones on Easter Island. World Archaeology. 2011;43(2):167–90.
56.
Hamilton S, Harrison S, Bender B. Conflicting imaginations: Archaeology, anthropology and geomorphology on Leskernick Hill, Bodmin Moor, southwest Britain. Geoforum. 2008 Mar;39(2):602–15.
57.
Morphy H. Landscape and the reproduction of the ancestral past. In: The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1995. p. 184–209. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70499.pdf
58.
Tilley CY. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In: A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments [Internet]. Oxford: Berg; 1994. p. 7–34. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70500.pdf
59.
Christopher Tilley. The Powers of Rocks: Topography and Monument Construction on Bodmin Moor. World Archaeology [Internet]. 1996;28(2):161–76. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/125068
60.
Parker Pearson M, Ramiiisonina. Stonehenge for the Ancestors: the stones pass on the message. Antiquity [Internet]. 1998;72(276):308–26. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217551333?accountid=14511
61.
Renfrew, Colin, Bahn, Paul G. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
62.
David N, Kramer C. Studying artifacts: functions, operating sequences, taxonomy. In: Ethnoarchaeology in action [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 138–67. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG1016_70501.pdf
63.
DeBoer W, Lathrap D. The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics. In: Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. New York: Columbia University Press; 1979. p. 102–38.
64.
Ferguson, Jeffrey R. Designing experimental research in archaeology: examining technology through production and use. Boulder, Colo: University Press of Colorado; 2010.
65.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2(2):117–63.
66.
Hodder, Ian. The present past: an introduction to anthropology for archaeologists. London: Batsford; 1982.
67.
Millson, Dana C. E., Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). Experimentation and interpretation: the use of experimental archaeology in the study of the past. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2011.
68.
Peacock, D. P. S. Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. Vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman; 1982.
69.
Reynolds PJ. The nature of experiment in archaeology. In: Experiment and design: archaeological studies in honour of John Coles [Internet]. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 1999. p. 156–62. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1007_59088.pdf
70.
Saraydar, Stephen C. Replicating the past: the art and science of the archaeological experiment. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press; 2008.
71.
Michael Brian Schiffer and James M. Skibo. The Explanation of Artifact Variability. American Antiquity [Internet]. 1997;62(1):27–50. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/282378
72.
Shimada I. Experimental archaeology. In: Handbook of archaeological methods. Lanham, Md: Altamira Press; 2005. p. 603–42.
73.
Jean-Pierre Protzen. Inca Quarrying and Stonecutting. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians [Internet]. 1985;44(2):161–82. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/990027
74.
Bell M, Fowler PJ, Hillson S, Andrews P, Council for British Archaeology, British Association for the Advancement of Science. The experimental earthwork project, 1960-1992 [Internet]. Vol. CBA research report. York: Council for British Archaeology; 1996. Available from: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr100.cfm
75.
Bradley R. The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: Routledge; 1998.
76.
Jewell PA, Dimbleby GW. The experimental earthwork on Overton Down, Wiltshire, England: the first four years. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society [Internet]. 1966;32:313–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00014420
77.
Ogburn D. Power in Stone: The Long-Distance Movement of Building Blocks in the Inca Empire. Ethnohistory [Internet]. 2004;51(1):101–35. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ethnohistory/v051/51.1ogburn.html
78.
Parker Pearson M, Ramiiisonina. Stonehenge for the Ancestors: the stones pass on the message. Antiquity [Internet]. 1998;72(276):308–26. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217551333?accountid=14511
79.
Sillar B. The building and rebuilding of walls: Aspirations, commitments and tensions within an Andean community and the archaeological monument they inhabit. Journal of Material Culture. 2013;18(1):27–51.
80.
Peacock DPS. Neolithic pottery production in Cornwall. Antiquity [Internet]. 1969;43(170):145–9. Available from: http://antiquity.ac.uk/Ant/043/0137/Ant0430137.pdf
81.
Bowman S. Tracing to Source. In: Science and the past [Internet]. London: British Museum Press; 1991. p. 99–116. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=23c734a4-6336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
82.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
83.
Blomster et al. JP. Olmec Pottery Production and Export in Ancient Mexico Determined Through Elemental Analysis. Science. 2005;307(5712):1068–72.
84.
Henderson, Julian. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: Routledge; 2000.
85.
Thomas HH. The source of the stones of Stonehenge. Antiquaries Journal. 1923;3(3):239–60.
86.
Tykot RH. Archaeological provenance studies. In: Martini et al. M, editor. Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004. p. 407–32.
87.
Wilson L, Pollard AM. The provenance hypothesis. In: Brothwell DR, Pollard AM, editors. Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: John Wiley; 2001. p. 507–17.
88.
Greene K, Moore T. Dating the past. In: Archaeology: an introduction [Internet]. 5th ed. London: Routledge; 2010. p. 148–89. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203835975
89.
Renfrew C. When? Dating Methods and Chronology. In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice [Internet]. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008. p. 121–74. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_69038
90.
Dee M, Wengrow D, Shortland A, Stevenson A, Brock F, Girdland Flink L, et al. An absolute chronology for early Egypt using radiocarbon dating and Bayesian statistical modelling. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2013;469(2159):20130395–20130395.
91.
Darvill et al. T. Stonehenge remodelled. Antiquity. 2012;86(334):1021–40.
92.
Adams WY. Archaeological classification: theory versus practice. Antiquity [Internet]. 1988;62(234):40–56. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293842480?accountid=14511
93.
Aitken MJ. Science-based dating in archaeology. Vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman; 1990.
94.
Lowe, J. J., Walker, M. J. C. Reconstructing Quaternary environments. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall; 1997.
95.
Bailey G. Concepts, time-scales and explanations in economic prehistory. In: Economic archaeology: towards an integration of ecological and social approaches [Internet]. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports; 1981. p. 97–117. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2cbede4-7236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
96.
Lucas, Gavin. The archaeology of time. Vol. Themes in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2005.
97.
Plog S, Hantman JL. Chronology Construction and the Study of Prehistoric Culture Change. Journal of Field Archaeology [Internet]. 1990;17(4):439–56. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/530005
98.
Smart, Peter, Frances, Peter D., Quaternary Research Association (Great Britain). Quaternary dating methods: a user’s guide. Vol. Technical guide / Quaternary Research Association. Cambridge: Quaternary Research Association; 1991.
99.
Taylor RE, Aitken MJ. Chronometric dating in archaeology. Vol. Advances in archaeological and museum science. New York: Plenum Press; 1997.
100.
Sillar B, Tite MS. The challenge of ‘technological choices’ for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry. 2000;42(1):2–20.
101.
Renfrew C, Bahn P. How did they make and use tools technology. In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008. p. 317–56.
102.
Barnett, William, Hoopes, John W. The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies. Vol. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. Washington [D.C.]: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1995.
103.
Cathy Lynne Costin. Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production. Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 1991;3:1–56. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170212
104.
Kingery, W. D. Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1996.
105.
Lemonnier, Pierre. Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. Vol. Material cultures. London: Routledge; 1993.
106.
Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1986;5(2):147–86.
107.
Lemonnier, Pierre. Elements for an anthropology of technology. Vol. Anthropological papers / Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, Mich: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan; 1992.
108.
Schlanger N. Mindful technology: unleasing the chaine operatoire for an archaeology of the mind. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 143–51. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70505.pdf
109.
Sigaut F. Technology. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology [Internet]. [New ed.]. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 420–59. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70506.pdf
110.
Edmonds MR. Squeezing blood from stones. In: Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain [Internet]. London: Batsford; 1995. p. 9–19. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_69042
111.
Whittaker JC. A brief history of flintknapping. In: Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools [Internet]. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1994. p. 23–63. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_69043
112.
Binford L. The challenge of the Mousterian. In: In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record : with a new afterword [Internet]. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2002. p. 79–94. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70507.pdf
113.
Edmonds, M. R. Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: Batsford; 1995.
114.
Holdaway S, Stern N. A record in stone: the study of Australia’s flaked stone artefacts. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press; 2004.
115.
Inizan ML, Féblot-Augustins J, Cercle de Recherches et d’Etude Préhistoriques. Technology and terminology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary Arabic, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish. Vol. Préhistoire de la pierre taillée; 5. Nanterre: CREP; 1999.
116.
Odell GH. Tool function. In: Lithic analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2004. p. 135–74.
117.
Pigeot N. Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian Etiolles. Archaeological review from Cambridge [Internet]. 1990;9(1):126–41. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70508.pdf
118.
Schick, Kathy Diane, Toth, Nicholas Patrick. Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. London: Phoenix; 1995.
119.
Torrence R. The obsidian quarries and their use. In: An Island polity: the archaeology of exploitation in Melos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 193–221.
120.
Renfrew C. Trade as Action at a Distance: Questions of Integration and Communication. In: Ancient civilization and trade [Internet]. 1st ed. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press; 1975. p. 3–59. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ca1eda40-7036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
121.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. What contact did the have? In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008. p. 347–80.
122.
Appadurai A. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986. p. 3–63.
123.
Bradley, Richard, Edmonds, M. R. Interpreting the axe trade: production and exchange in Neolithic Britain. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
124.
Graham E. Resource Diversity in Belize and Its Implications for Models of Lowland Trade. American Antiquity [Internet]. 1987;52(4):753–67. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/281383
125.
Gregory CA. Exchange and reciprocity. In: Ingold T, editor. Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. [New ed.]. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 911–33.
126.
Peacock DPS, Williams DF. Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductory guide. Vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman; 1986.
127.
Perles C. Systems of Exchange and Organization of Production in Neolithic Greece. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. 1992;5(2):115–64.
128.
Woolf G. World-systems analysis and the Roman Empire. Journal of Roman archaeology. 1990;3:44–58.
129.
M. S. Tite. Pottery Production, Distribution, and Consumption: The Contribution of the Physical Sciences. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 1999;6(3):181–233. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177403
130.
Van Der Leeuw SE. Dust to Dust: A transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam; 1984. p. 709–73.
131.
Arnold, Dean E. Ceramic theory and cultural process. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
132.
Barnett, William, Hoopes, John W. The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies. Vol. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. Washington [D.C.]: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1995.
133.
Freestone, Ian, Gaimster, David R. M. Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions. London: British Museum Press; 1997.
134.
Henderson J. Ceramics. In: The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 109–207.
135.
Orton C. The potential of pottery as archaeological evidence. In: Pottery in archaeology [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 23–35. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70518.pdf
136.
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
137.
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 2. Composition, Production, and Theory. Journal of Archaeological Research [Internet]. 1996;4(3):165–202. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053131
138.
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Vol. Manuals on archeology. Washington, D.C.: Taraxacum; 1981.
139.
Skibo, James M., Feinman, Gary M. Pottery and people: a dynamic interaction. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1999.
140.
Tyers, Paul. Roman pottery in Britain. London: Batsford; 1996.
141.
Richard Bradley. The Destruction of Wealth in Later Prehistory. Man [Internet]. 1982;17(1):108–22. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2802104
142.
Chapman J. Fragmentation in archaeology: people, places, and broken objects in the prehistory of south-eastern Europe. London: Routledge; 2000.
143.
Corbey R, Layton R, Tanner JT. Archaeology and Art. In: A companion to archaeology [Internet]. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2004. p. 357–79. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470998618
144.
Deal M. Household pottery disposal in the Maya highlands: An ethnoarchaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1985;4(4):243–91.
145.
Deal M, Hagstrum B. Ceramic reuse behavior among the Maya and Wanka: Implications for Archaeology. In: Expanding archaeology. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1995. p. 111–25.
146.
Graham E. Control without Controlling. In: Motul de San José: politics, history, and economy in a classic Maya polity. Gainesville: University Press of Florida; 2012. p. 419–30.
147.
Hodder I, World Archaeological Congress. The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic; 1989.
148.
Hodder I. The Decoration of Containers: An Ethnographic and Historical Study. In: Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1991. p. 71–94.
149.
Kopytoff I. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986. p. 64–94. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f60c4109-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
150.
Parker Pearson M. Status, rank and power. In: The archaeology of death and burial [Internet]. Stroud: Sutton; 1999. p. 72–94. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c28d105b-6936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
151.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. How were societies organized? In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008. p. 169–222.
152.
Sackett JR. Style and Ethnicity in the Kalahari: A Reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity [Internet]. 1985;50(1):154–9. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/280642
153.
Shennan S. Introduction: Archaeological approaches to cultural identity. In: Archaeological approaches to cultural identity [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 1–32. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=536ec789-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
154.
Is there a Place for Aesthetics in Archaeology? Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1994;4(2):249–69.
155.
Wiessner P. Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points. American Antiquity [Internet]. 1983;48(2):253–76. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/280450
156.
Wobst HM. Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In: For the director: research essays in honor of James B Griffin. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan; 1977. p. 317–42.
157.
J. Bayley et al., English Heritage. Archaeometallurgy. Centre for Archaeology Guidelines [Internet]. Vol. Centre for Archaeology guidelines. Swindon: English Heritage; 2001. Available from: http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/archaeometallurgy/
158.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. How did they make and use tools technology. In: Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008. p. 317–56.
159.
Bayley, J., Crossley, David W., Ponting, Matthew. Metals and metalworking: a research framework for archaeometallurgy [Internet]. Vol. Occasional publication, No. 6. London: Historical Metallurgy Society; 2008. Available from: http://hist-met.org/publications/hms-occasional-publications.html
160.
Cleere H. Ironmaking in the economy of the ancient world: the potential of archaeometallurgy. In: Scott et al. BG, editor. The Crafts of the blacksmith. Belfast?]: UISPP Comité pour la Sidérurgie Ancienne and the Ulster Museum; 1986. p. 1–6.
161.
Craddock PT. Mining and smelting in Antiquity. In: Bowman S, editor. Science and the past. London: British Museum Press; 1991. p. 57–73.
162.
Craddock PT. Early metal mining and production. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1995.
163.
Rehren TH, Pernicka E. Coins, artefacts and isotopes - archaeometallurgy and archaeometry. Archaeometry. 2008;50(2):232–48.
164.
Tylecote RF. The early history of metallurgy in Europe. Vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman; 1987.
165.
Lambert JB. Metals. In: Traces of the past: unraveling the secrets of archaeology through chemistry [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: Perseus; 1997. p. 168–213. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70524.pdf
166.
Cronyn JM. Introducing archaeological conservation. In: The elements of archaeological conservation [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1990. p. 1–13. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3225f62f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
167.
Cronyn JM. Agents of Deterioration and Preservation. In: The elements of archaeological conservation. London: Routledge; 1990. p. 14–42.
168.
Jones S, Holden J. It’s a material world: caring for the public realm. London: Demos; 2008.
169.
Buttler CJ, Davis M, National Museum Wales. Things fall apart--: museum conservation in practice. Cardiff: National Museum Wales Books; 2006.
170.
Pye, Elizabeth. Caring for the past: issues in conservation for archaeology and museums. London: James & James; 2001.
171.
Sease C. A conservation manual for the field archaeologist [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. Archaeological research tools. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California; 1994. Available from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8ft6488x?query=sease#page-1
172.
Watkinson, David, Neal, Virginia, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, Museum of London, Rescue (Trust). First aid for finds. 3rd ed. Hertford: RESCUE - The British Archaeological Trust; Archaeology Section of the UKIC; The Museum of London; 1998.
173.
Barber, E. J. W. Prehistoric textiles: the development of cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with special reference to the Aegean. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press; 1991.
174.
Elizabeth M. Brumfiel. The Quality of Tribute Cloth: The Place of Evidence in Archaeological Argument. American Antiquity [Internet]. 1996;61(3):453–62. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/281834
175.
Davis, Simon J. M. The archaeology of animals. London: Batsford; 1987.
176.
Dijkman, W., Ervynck, A. Antler, bone, horn, ivory and teeth: the use of animal skeletal materials in Roman and early medieval Maastricht. Vol. Archaeologica Mosana. Maastricht: Archaeology Section, Department of Urban Development and Ground Maintenance, Municipality of Maastricht in collaboration with the Institute for the Archaeological Heritage of the Flemish Community; 1998.
177.
McCorriston J. The Fibre Revolution. Textile Extensification, Alienation, and Social Stratification in Ancient Mesopotamia. Current Anthropology. 1997 Aug;38(4):517–35.
178.
Mc Donnell JG. Pyrotechnology. In: Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: John Wiley; 2001. p. 493–312.
179.
Renfrew C, Bahn PG. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
180.
Sillar B. Dung by preference: The choice of fuel as an example of how Andean pottery production is embedded within wider technical, social, and economic practices. Archaeometry. 2000;42(1):43–60.
181.
Wild, John Peter. Textiles in archaeology. Vol. Shire archaeology. Princes Risborough: Shire; 1988.
