[1]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
[2]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, Archaeology: theories, methods, and practice, Seventh edition. London: Thames & Hudson, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=6178544
[3]
Caple, Chris, Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past. London: Routledge, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203409060
[4]
Carver, M. O. H., Archaeological investigation. London: Routledge, 2009.
[5]
M. Carver, ‘Resources: Archaeological Investigation’, Routledge Resources for Archaeology. [Online]. Available: http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/resourcesforarchaeology/resources_archaeological_investigation.asp
[6]
Edmonds, M. R., Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: Batsford, 1995.
[7]
Greene, Kevin and Moore, Tom, Archaeology: an introduction, 5th ed. London: Routledge, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203835975
[8]
Henderson, Julian, The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: Routledge, 2000.
[9]
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, and Vince, A. G., Pottery in archaeology, vol. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[10]
Renfrew, Colin and Bahn, Paul G., Archaeology: the key concepts, vol. [Routledge key guides]. London: Routledge, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203491096
[11]
Schiffer, Michael B., Behavioral archaeology: first principles, vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1995.
[12]
Schiffer, Michael B., Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press, 1987.
[13]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
[14]
L. R. Binford, ‘A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design’, American Antiquity, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 425–441, 1964 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/277978
[15]
V. G. Childe, Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956.
[16]
V. Lamotta and M. Schiffer, ‘Archaeological formation processes’, in Archaeology: the key concepts, vol. Routledge key guides, London: Routledge, 2005, pp. 121–127 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203491096
[17]
G. Lucas, ‘Splitting objects’, in Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice, London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 64–106 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203132258
[18]
C. H. Miksicek, ‘Formation Processes of the Archaeobotanical Record’, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 10, pp. 211–247, 1987 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20210089
[19]
M. B. Schiffer, Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press, 1987.
[20]
J. K. Stein, ‘A review of site formation processes and their relevance to geoarchaeology’, in Earth sciences and archaeology, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001, pp. 37–51.
[21]
S. E. van der Leeuw, ‘Dust to Dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle’, in The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, vol. Cingula, Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 709–773.
[22]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
[23]
L. R. Binford, ‘Behavioral Archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise”’, Journal of Anthropological Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 195–208, 1981 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
[24]
Richard Bradley, ‘The Destruction of Wealth in Later Prehistory’, Man, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 108–122, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2802104
[25]
C. K. Brain, The hunters or the hunted?: An introduction to African cave taphonomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
[26]
B. Hayden and A. Cannon, ‘Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 117–163, 1983, doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7.
[27]
J. D. Hill, Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record, vol. BAR British series. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum, 1995.
[28]
V. M. LaMotta and B. Schiffer, ‘Formation processes of housefloor assemblages’, in The archaeology of household activities, P. M. Allison, Ed. London: Routledge, 1999, pp. 19–29 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203014929
[29]
G. Lucas, ‘Eventful contexts’, in Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice, London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 146–199 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203132258
[30]
M. B. Schiffer, ‘Behavioral chain analysis: activities, organization and the use of space’, in Behavioral archaeology: first principles, vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1995, pp. 55–66.
[31]
M. B. Schiffer, ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’, American Antiquity, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 156–165, 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/278203
[32]
M. B. Schiffer, Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press, 1987.
[33]
M. O. H. Carver, Archaeological investigation. London: Routledge, 2009.
[34]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
[35]
M. O. H. Carver, ‘The nature of urban deposits’, in Urban archaeology in Britain, vol. CBA research reports, London: Council for British Archaeology, 1987, pp. 9–26 [Online]. Available: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr61.cfm
[36]
M. O. H. Carver, Underneath English towns: interpreting urban archaeology. London: B.T. Batsford, 1987.
[37]
P. Drewett, A. B. Ellison, C. R. Cartwright, P. Hinton, and T. P. O’Connor, ‘Later Bronze Age Downland Economy and Excavations at Black Patch, East Sussex’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, vol. 48, pp. 321–400, 1982, doi: 10.1017/S0079497X00008434.
[38]
A. Gardner, ‘Time and empire in the Roman world’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 145–166, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1469605312439971.
[39]
J. Greig, ‘The interpretation of pollen spectra from urban deposits’, in Environmental archaeology in the urban context, vol. CBA research report, London: Council for British Archaeology, 1982, pp. 47–65 [Online]. Available: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr43.cfm
[40]
G. Lucas, ‘Eventful contexts’, in Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice, London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 146–199 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203132258
[41]
Parker Pearson, Michael, The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: Sutton, 1999.
[42]
G. Lock and T. Harris, ‘Visualising spatial data: the importance of Geographic Information Systems’, in Archaeology and the information age: a global perspective, vol. One world archaeology, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 80–96 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f700f2c6-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[43]
C. Vita-Finzi, E. S. Higgs, D. Sturdy, J. Harriss, A. J. Legge, and H. Tippett, ‘Prehistoric Economy in the Mount Carmel Area of Palestine: Site Catchment Analysis’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, vol. 36, pp. 1–37, 1970, doi: 10.1017/S0079497X00013074.
[44]
A. Bevan, ‘Spatial methods for analysing large-scale artefact inventories’, Antiquity, vol. 86, no. 332, pp. 492–506, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1021249050?accountid=14511
[45]
L. R. Binford, ‘People in their lifespace’, in In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record : with a new afterword, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002.
[46]
I. Hodder, ‘Locational models and the study of Romano-British settlement’, in Models in archaeology, London: Methuen, 1972, pp. 887–909 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f662ae83-5636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[47]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
[48]
Hirsch, Eric and O’Hanlon, Michael, The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space, vol. Oxford studies in social and cultural anthropology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
[49]
S. Hamilton, R. Whitehouse, K. Brown, P. Combes, E. Herring, and M. S. Thomas, ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach’, European Journal of Archaeology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–71, 2006, doi: 10.1177/1461957107077704.
[50]
C. Tilley, ‘Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology’, in Handbook of landscape archaeology, vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology, Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2008, pp. 271–276 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70496.pdf
[51]
Bender, Barbara, Landscape: politics and perspectives, vol. Explorations in anthropology. New York: Berg, 1993.
[52]
Barbara Bender, ‘Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscapes of Stonehenge’, Man, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 735–755, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2804172
[53]
B. Bender et al., ‘Methodologies’, in Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology, vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2007, pp. 50–75 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70497.pdf
[54]
D. Cosgrove, ‘Geography is everywhere: culture and symbolism in human landscapes’, in Horizons in human geography, Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1989, pp. 118–135 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70498.pdf
[55]
S. Hamilton, M. Seager Thomas, and R. Whitehouse, ‘Say it with stone: constructing with stones on Easter Island’, World Archaeology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 167–190, 2011, doi: 10.1080/00438243.2011.586273.
[56]
S. Hamilton, S. Harrison, and B. Bender, ‘Conflicting imaginations: Archaeology, anthropology and geomorphology on Leskernick Hill, Bodmin Moor, southwest Britain’, Geoforum, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 602–615, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.025.
[57]
H. Morphy, ‘Landscape and the reproduction of the ancestral past’, in The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space, vol. Oxford studies in social and cultural anthropology, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995, pp. 184–209 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70499.pdf
[58]
C. Y. Tilley, ‘Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives’, in A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments, vol. Explorations in anthropology, Oxford: Berg, 1994, pp. 7–34 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70500.pdf
[59]
Christopher Tilley, ‘The Powers of Rocks: Topography and Monument Construction on Bodmin Moor’, World Archaeology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 161–176, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/125068
[60]
M. Parker Pearson and Ramiiisonina, ‘Stonehenge for the Ancestors: the stones pass on the message’, Antiquity, vol. 72, no. 276, pp. 308–326, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217551333?accountid=14511
[61]
Renfrew, Colin and Bahn, Paul G., Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
[62]
N. David and C. Kramer, ‘Studying artifacts: functions, operating sequences, taxonomy’, in Ethnoarchaeology in action, vol. Cambridge world archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 138–167 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG1016_70501.pdf
[63]
W. DeBoer and D. Lathrap, ‘The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics’, in Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology, New York: Columbia University Press, 1979, pp. 102–138.
[64]
Ferguson, Jeffrey R., Designing experimental research in archaeology: examining technology through production and use. Boulder, Colo: University Press of Colorado, 2010.
[65]
B. Hayden and A. Cannon, ‘Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 117–163, 1983, doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7.
[66]
Hodder, Ian, The present past: an introduction to anthropology for archaeologists. London: Batsford, 1982.
[67]
Millson, Dana C. E. and Theoretical Archaeology Group (England), Experimentation and interpretation: the use of experimental archaeology in the study of the past. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2011.
[68]
Peacock, D. P. S., Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach, vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman, 1982.
[69]
P. J. Reynolds, ‘The nature of experiment in archaeology’, in Experiment and design: archaeological studies in honour of John Coles, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1999, pp. 156–162 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1007_59088.pdf
[70]
Saraydar, Stephen C., Replicating the past: the art and science of the archaeological experiment. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press, 2008.
[71]
Michael Brian Schiffer and James M. Skibo, ‘The Explanation of Artifact Variability’, American Antiquity, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 27–50, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/282378
[72]
I. Shimada, ‘Experimental archaeology’, in Handbook of archaeological methods, Lanham, Md: Altamira Press, 2005, pp. 603–642.
[73]
Jean-Pierre Protzen, ‘Inca Quarrying and Stonecutting’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 161–182, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/990027
[74]
M. Bell, P. J. Fowler, S. Hillson, P. Andrews, Council for British Archaeology, and British Association for the Advancement of Science, The experimental earthwork project, 1960-1992, vol. CBA research report. York: Council for British Archaeology, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr100.cfm
[75]
R. Bradley, The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: Routledge, 1998.
[76]
P. A. Jewell and G. W. Dimbleby, ‘The experimental earthwork on Overton Down, Wiltshire, England: the first four years’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, vol. 32, pp. 313–342, 1966 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00014420
[77]
D. Ogburn, ‘Power in Stone: The Long-Distance Movement of Building Blocks in the Inca Empire’, Ethnohistory, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 101–135, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ethnohistory/v051/51.1ogburn.html
[78]
M. Parker Pearson and Ramiiisonina, ‘Stonehenge for the Ancestors: the stones pass on the message’, Antiquity, vol. 72, no. 276, pp. 308–326, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217551333?accountid=14511
[79]
B. Sillar, ‘The building and rebuilding of walls: Aspirations, commitments and tensions within an Andean community and the archaeological monument they inhabit’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 27–51, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1359183512473558.
[80]
D. P. S. Peacock, ‘Neolithic pottery production in Cornwall’, Antiquity, vol. 43, no. 170, pp. 145–149, 1969 [Online]. Available: http://antiquity.ac.uk/Ant/043/0137/Ant0430137.pdf
[81]
S. Bowman, ‘Tracing to Source’, in Science and the past, London: British Museum Press, 1991, pp. 99–116 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=23c734a4-6336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[82]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
[83]
J. P. Blomster et al., ‘Olmec Pottery Production and Export in Ancient Mexico Determined Through Elemental Analysis’, Science, vol. 307, no. 5712, pp. 1068–1072, 2005, doi: 10.1126/science.1107599.
[84]
Henderson, Julian, The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: Routledge, 2000.
[85]
H. H. Thomas, ‘The source of the stones of Stonehenge’, Antiquaries Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 239–260, 1923, doi: 10.1017/S0003581500005096.
[86]
R. H. Tykot, ‘Archaeological provenance studies’, in Physics methods in archaeometry, vol. Proceedings of the International School of Physics ‘Enrico Fermi’, M. Martini et al., Ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004, pp. 407–432.
[87]
L. Wilson and A. M. Pollard, ‘The provenance hypothesis’, in Handbook of archaeological sciences, D. R. Brothwell and A. M. Pollard, Eds. Chichester: John Wiley, 2001, pp. 507–517.
[88]
K. Greene and T. Moore, ‘Dating the past’, in Archaeology: an introduction, 5th ed., London: Routledge, 2010, pp. 148–189 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203835975
[89]
C. Renfrew, ‘When? Dating Methods and Chronology’, in Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed., London: Thames & Hudson, 2008, pp. 121–174 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_69038
[90]
M. Dee et al., ‘An absolute chronology for early Egypt using radiocarbon dating and Bayesian statistical modelling’, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 469, no. 2159, pp. 20130395–20130395, 2013, doi: 10.1098/rspa.2013.0395.
[91]
T. Darvill et al., ‘Stonehenge remodelled’, Antiquity, vol. 86, no. 334, pp. 1021–1040, 2012, doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00048225.
[92]
W. Y. Adams, ‘Archaeological classification: theory versus practice’, Antiquity, vol. 62, no. 234, pp. 40–56, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293842480?accountid=14511
[93]
M. J. Aitken, Science-based dating in archaeology, vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman, 1990.
[94]
Lowe, J. J. and Walker, M. J. C., Reconstructing Quaternary environments, 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall, 1997.
[95]
G. Bailey, ‘Concepts, time-scales and explanations in economic prehistory’, in Economic archaeology: towards an integration of ecological and social approaches, vol. BAR international series, Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 1981, pp. 97–117 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2cbede4-7236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[96]
Lucas, Gavin, The archaeology of time, vol. Themes in archaeology. London: Routledge, 2005.
[97]
S. Plog and J. L. Hantman, ‘Chronology Construction and the Study of Prehistoric Culture Change’, Journal of Field Archaeology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 439–456, 1990, doi: 10.2307/530005. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/530005
[98]
Smart, Peter, Frances, Peter D., and Quaternary Research Association (Great Britain), Quaternary dating methods: a user’s guide, vol. Technical guide / Quaternary Research Association. Cambridge: Quaternary Research Association, 1991.
[99]
R. E. Taylor and M. J. Aitken, Chronometric dating in archaeology, vol. Advances in archaeological and museum science. New York: Plenum Press, 1997.
[100]
B. Sillar and M. S. Tite, ‘The challenge of “technological choices” for materials science approaches in archaeology’, Archaeometry, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 2–20, 2000, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x.
[101]
C. Renfrew and P. Bahn, ‘How did they make and use tools technology’, in Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed., London: Thames & Hudson, 2008, pp. 317–356.
[102]
Barnett, William and Hoopes, John W., The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies, vol. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. Washington [D.C.]: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1995.
[103]
Cathy Lynne Costin, ‘Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production’, Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 3, pp. 1–56, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170212
[104]
Kingery, W. D., Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1996.
[105]
Lemonnier, Pierre, Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic, vol. Material cultures. London: Routledge, 1993.
[106]
P. Lemonnier, ‘The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 147–186, 1986, doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7.
[107]
Lemonnier, Pierre, Elements for an anthropology of technology, vol. Anthropological papers / Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, Mich: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 1992.
[108]
N. Schlanger, ‘Mindful technology: unleasing the chaine operatoire for an archaeology of the mind’, in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 143–151 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70505.pdf
[109]
F. Sigaut, ‘Technology’, in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology, [New ed.]., vol. Routledge world reference, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 420–459 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70506.pdf
[110]
M. R. Edmonds, ‘Squeezing blood from stones’, in Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain, London: Batsford, 1995, pp. 9–19 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_69042
[111]
J. C. Whittaker, ‘A brief history of flintknapping’, in Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools, Austin: University of Texas Press, 1994, pp. 23–63 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_69043
[112]
L. Binford, ‘The challenge of the Mousterian’, in In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record : with a new afterword, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002, pp. 79–94 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70507.pdf
[113]
Edmonds, M. R., Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: Batsford, 1995.
[114]
S. Holdaway and N. Stern, A record in stone: the study of Australia’s flaked stone artefacts. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press, 2004.
[115]
M.-L. Inizan, J. Féblot-Augustins, and Cercle de Recherches et d’Etude Préhistoriques, Technology and terminology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary Arabic, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, vol. Préhistoire de la pierre taillée; 5. Nanterre: CREP, 1999.
[116]
G. H. Odell, ‘Tool function’, in Lithic analysis, vol. Manuals in archaeological method, theory, and technique, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2004, pp. 135–174.
[117]
N. Pigeot, ‘Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian Etiolles’, Archaeological review from Cambridge, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 126–141, 1990 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70508.pdf
[118]
Schick, Kathy Diane and Toth, Nicholas Patrick, Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. London: Phoenix, 1995.
[119]
R. Torrence, ‘The obsidian quarries and their use’, in An Island polity: the archaeology of exploitation in Melos, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 193–221.
[120]
C. Renfrew, ‘Trade as Action at a Distance: Questions of Integration and Communication’, in Ancient civilization and trade, 1st ed., vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1975, pp. 3–59 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ca1eda40-7036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[121]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, ‘What contact did the have?’, in Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed., London: Thames & Hudson, 2008, pp. 347–380.
[122]
A. Appadurai, ‘Introduction: commodities and the politics of value’, in The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 3–63.
[123]
Bradley, Richard and Edmonds, M. R., Interpreting the axe trade: production and exchange in Neolithic Britain, vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[124]
E. Graham, ‘Resource Diversity in Belize and Its Implications for Models of Lowland Trade’, American Antiquity, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 753–767, 1987 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/281383
[125]
C. A. Gregory, ‘Exchange and reciprocity’, in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology, [New ed.]., vol. Routledge world reference, T. Ingold, Ed. London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 911–933.
[126]
D. P. S. Peacock and D. F. Williams, Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductory guide, vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman, 1986.
[127]
C. Perles, ‘Systems of Exchange and Organization of Production in Neolithic Greece’, Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115–164, 1992, doi: 10.1558/jmea.v5i2.115.
[128]
G. Woolf, ‘World-systems analysis and the Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman archaeology, vol. 3, pp. 44–58, 1990.
[129]
M. S. Tite, ‘Pottery Production, Distribution, and Consumption: The Contribution of the Physical Sciences’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 181–233, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177403
[130]
S. E. Van Der Leeuw, ‘Dust to Dust: A transformational view of the ceramic cycle’, in The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, vol. Cingula, Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 709–773.
[131]
Arnold, Dean E., Ceramic theory and cultural process, vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[132]
Barnett, William and Hoopes, John W., The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies, vol. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. Washington [D.C.]: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1995.
[133]
Freestone, Ian and Gaimster, David R. M., Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions. London: British Museum Press, 1997.
[134]
J. Henderson, ‘Ceramics’, in The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 109–207.
[135]
C. Orton, ‘The potential of pottery as archaeological evidence’, in Pottery in archaeology, 2nd ed., vol. Cambridge manuals in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 23–35 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70518.pdf
[136]
Rice, Prudence M., Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
[137]
Prudence M. Rice, ‘Recent Ceramic Analysis: 2. Composition, Production, and Theory’, Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 165–202, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053131
[138]
Rye, Owen S., Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction, vol. Manuals on archeology. Washington, D.C.: Taraxacum, 1981.
[139]
Skibo, James M. and Feinman, Gary M., Pottery and people: a dynamic interaction, vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1999.
[140]
Tyers, Paul, Roman pottery in Britain. London: Batsford, 1996.
[141]
Richard Bradley, ‘The Destruction of Wealth in Later Prehistory’, Man, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 108–122, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2802104
[142]
J. Chapman, Fragmentation in archaeology: people, places, and broken objects in the prehistory of south-eastern Europe. London: Routledge, 2000.
[143]
R. Corbey, R. Layton, and J. T. Tanner, ‘Archaeology and Art’, in A companion to archaeology, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004, pp. 357–379 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470998618
[144]
M. Deal, ‘Household pottery disposal in the Maya highlands: An ethnoarchaeological interpretation’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 243–291, 1985, doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(85)90008-X.
[145]
M. Deal and B. Hagstrum, ‘Ceramic reuse behavior among the Maya and Wanka: Implications for Archaeology’, in Expanding archaeology, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1995, pp. 111–125.
[146]
E. Graham, ‘Control without Controlling’, in Motul de San José: politics, history, and economy in a classic Maya polity, vol. Maya studies, Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2012, pp. 419–430.
[147]
I. Hodder and World Archaeological Congress, The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression, vol. One world archaeology. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic, 1989.
[148]
I. Hodder, ‘The Decoration of Containers: An Ethnographic and Historical Study’, in Ceramic ethnoarchaeology, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1991, pp. 71–94.
[149]
I. Kopytoff, ‘The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process’, in The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 64–94 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f60c4109-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[150]
M. Parker Pearson, ‘Status, rank and power’, in The archaeology of death and burial, Stroud: Sutton, 1999, pp. 72–94 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c28d105b-6936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[151]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, ‘How were societies organized?’, in Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed., London: Thames & Hudson, 2008, pp. 169–222.
[152]
J. R. Sackett, ‘Style and Ethnicity in the Kalahari: A Reply to Wiessner’, American Antiquity, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 154–159, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/280642
[153]
S. Shennan, ‘Introduction: Archaeological approaches to cultural identity’, in Archaeological approaches to cultural identity, vol. One world archaeology, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 1–32 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=536ec789-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[154]
‘Is there a Place for Aesthetics in Archaeology?’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 249–269, 1994, doi: 10.1017/S0959774300001098.
[155]
P. Wiessner, ‘Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points’, American Antiquity, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 253–276, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/280450
[156]
H. M. Wobst, ‘Stylistic behavior and information exchange’, in For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin, vol. Anthropological papers, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 1977, pp. 317–342.
[157]
J. Bayley et al. and English Heritage, Archaeometallurgy. Centre for Archaeology Guidelines, vol. Centre for Archaeology guidelines. Swindon: English Heritage, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/archaeometallurgy/
[158]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, ‘How did they make and use tools technology’, in Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed., London: Thames & Hudson, 2008, pp. 317–356.
[159]
Bayley, J., Crossley, David W., and Ponting, Matthew, Metals and metalworking: a research framework for archaeometallurgy, vol. Occasional publication, No. 6. London: Historical Metallurgy Society, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://hist-met.org/publications/hms-occasional-publications.html
[160]
H. Cleere, ‘Ironmaking in the economy of the ancient world: the potential of archaeometallurgy’, in The Crafts of the blacksmith, B. G. Scott et al., Ed. Belfast?]: UISPP Comité pour la Sidérurgie Ancienne and the Ulster Museum, 1986, pp. 1–6.
[161]
P. T. Craddock, ‘Mining and smelting in Antiquity’, in Science and the past, S. Bowman, Ed. London: British Museum Press, 1991, pp. 57–73.
[162]
P. T. Craddock, Early metal mining and production. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.
[163]
T. H. Rehren and E. Pernicka, ‘Coins, artefacts and isotopes - archaeometallurgy and archaeometry’, Archaeometry, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 232–248, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00389.x.
[164]
R. F. Tylecote, The early history of metallurgy in Europe, vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman, 1987.
[165]
J. B. Lambert, ‘Metals’, in Traces of the past: unraveling the secrets of archaeology through chemistry, vol. Helix books, Cambridge, Mass: Perseus, 1997, pp. 168–213 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1016_70524.pdf
[166]
J. M. Cronyn, ‘Introducing archaeological conservation’, in The elements of archaeological conservation, London: Routledge, 1990, pp. 1–13 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3225f62f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[167]
J. M. Cronyn, ‘Agents of Deterioration and Preservation’, in The elements of archaeological conservation, London: Routledge, 1990, pp. 14–42.
[168]
S. Jones and J. Holden, It’s a material world: caring for the public realm. London: Demos, 2008.
[169]
C. J. Buttler, M. Davis, and National Museum Wales, Things fall apart--: museum conservation in practice. Cardiff: National Museum Wales Books, 2006.
[170]
Pye, Elizabeth, Caring for the past: issues in conservation for archaeology and museums. London: James & James, 2001.
[171]
C. Sease, A conservation manual for the field archaeologist, 2nd ed., vol. Archaeological research tools. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8ft6488x?query=sease#page-1
[172]
Watkinson, David, Neal, Virginia, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, Museum of London, and Rescue (Trust), First aid for finds, 3rd ed. Hertford: RESCUE - The British Archaeological Trust; Archaeology Section of the UKIC; The Museum of London, 1998.
[173]
Barber, E. J. W., Prehistoric textiles: the development of cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with special reference to the Aegean. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1991.
[174]
Elizabeth M. Brumfiel, ‘The Quality of Tribute Cloth: The Place of Evidence in Archaeological Argument’, American Antiquity, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 453–462, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/281834
[175]
Davis, Simon J. M., The archaeology of animals. London: Batsford, 1987.
[176]
Dijkman, W. and Ervynck, A., Antler, bone, horn, ivory and teeth: the use of animal skeletal materials in Roman and early medieval Maastricht, vol. Archaeologica Mosana. Maastricht: Archaeology Section, Department of Urban Development and Ground Maintenance, Municipality of Maastricht in collaboration with the Institute for the Archaeological Heritage of the Flemish Community, 1998.
[177]
J. McCorriston, ‘The Fibre Revolution. Textile Extensification, Alienation, and Social Stratification in Ancient Mesopotamia’, Current Anthropology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 517–535, Aug. 1997, doi: 10.1086/204643.
[178]
J. G. Mc Donnell, ‘Pyrotechnology’, in Handbook of archaeological sciences, Chichester: John Wiley, 2001, pp. 493–312.
[179]
C. Renfrew and P. G. Bahn, Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
[180]
B. Sillar, ‘Dung by preference: The choice of fuel as an example of how Andean pottery production is embedded within wider technical, social, and economic practices’, Archaeometry, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 43–60, 2000, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00865.x.
[181]
Wild, John Peter, Textiles in archaeology, vol. Shire archaeology. Princes Risborough: Shire, 1988.
