1
Inman K, Rudin N. The origin of evidence. Forensic Science International 2002;126:11–6. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00031-2
2
Morgan RM, Wiltshire P, Parker A, et al. The role of forensic geoscience in wildlife crime detection. Forensic Science International 2006;162:152–62. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.045
3
Morgan RM, Bull PA. The philosophy, nature and practice of forensic sediment analysis. Progress in Physical Geography 2007;31:43–58. doi:10.1177/0309133307073881
4
Ruffell A, McKinley J. Forensic geoscience: applications of geology, geomorphology and geophysics to criminal investigations. Earth-Science Reviews 2005;69:235–47. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.08.002
5
Jonathan. J. Koehler MJS. The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science Evidence. 2008;61:199–219.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1432516
6
Cole SA. Forensic culture as epistemic culture: The sociology of forensic science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2013;44:36–46. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.003
7
Jasanoff S. Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process. The Journal of Law, Medicine Ethics 2006;34:328–41. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00038.x
8
Kiely TF. Forensic evidence: science and the criminal law. Second edition. Boca Raton, FL: : CRC Press 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420038064
9
Kirk PL. Crime investigation. Second edition. New York: : John Wiley & Sons 1974.
10
Michael Lynch and Sheila Jasanoff. Introduction: Contested Identities: Science, Law and Forensic Practice. Social Studies of Science 1998;28:675–86.http://www.jstor.org/stable/285513?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Fc5%3DAND%26amp%3Bq2%3D%26amp%3Bf4%3Dall%26amp%3Bf2%3Dall%26amp%3Bla%3D%26amp%3Bpt%3D%26amp%3Bq4%3D%26amp%3Bq6%3D%26amp%3Bc4%3DAND%26amp%3Bf6%3Dall%26amp%3Bf3%3Dall%26amp%3Bq0%3DContested%2BIdentities%253A%2Bscience%252C%2Blaw%2Band%2Bforensic%2Bpractice%26amp%3Bc3%3DAND%26amp%3Bf0%3Dall%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bc1%3DAND%26amp%3Bq1%3D%26amp%3Bf1%3Dall%26amp%3Bc6%3DAND%26amp%3Bf5%3Dall%26amp%3Bq3%3D%26amp%3Bisbn%3D%26amp%3Bed%3D%26amp%3Bsd%3D%26amp%3Bc2%3DAND%26amp%3Bq5%3D%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
11
Morgan RM, Bull PA. Data Interpretation in Forensic Sediment and Soil Geochemistry. Environmental Forensics 2006;7:325–34. doi:10.1080/15275920600996248
12
Rawlins BG, Kemp SJ, Hodgkinson EH, et al. Potential and Pitfalls in Establishing the Provenance of Earth-Related Samples in Forensic Investigations. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2006;51:832–45. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00152.x
13
BBC Radio 4 - The Infinite Monkey Cage, Series 12, Forensic Science. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b064yglg
14
The Forensics Library. http://aboutforensics.co.uk/
15
BBC Radio 4 - Forensics in Crisis. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05sv09g/broadcasts/2015/05
16
Hamzelou J. Hair analysis on trial after FBI admits to using flawed evidence. Published Online First: 2015.https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27386-hair-analysis-on-trial-after-fbi-admits-to-using-flawed-evidence/#.VTnvtpOcvvs
17
Drahl C, Widener A. Forcing Change In Forensic Science. 2014;92:10–5.http://cen.acs.org/articles/92/i19/Forcing-Change-Forensic-Science.html
18
BBC Radio 4 - The Life Scientific, Niamh Nic Daeid. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b062k9zz
19
BBC Four - Catching History’s Criminals: The Forensics Story. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02l4p5x
20
BBC Radio 4 - The Report, Forensic Science. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01m68w2
21
Balding DJ, Buckleton J. Interpreting low template DNA profiles. Forensic Science International: Genetics 2009;4:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.03.003
22
Jasanoff S. Law’s Knowledge: Science for Justice in Legal Settings. American Journal of Public Health 2005;95:S49–58. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.045732
23
Morgan, RM. The relevance of the evolution of experimental studies for the interpretation and evaluation of some trace physical evidence. Science & Justice Published Online First: 2009.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=UCL_EPR_DS84827&context=L&vid=UCL_VU2〈=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=local&query=any,contains,The%20relevance%20of%20the%20evolution%20of%20experimental%20studies%20for%20the%20interpretation%20and%20evaluation%20of%20some%20trace%20physical%20evidence&sortby=rank&offset=0
24
Thompson WC, Schumann EL. Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor’s fallacy and the defense attorney’s fallacy. Law and Human Behavior 1987;11:167–87. doi:10.1007/BF01044641
25
Morgan RM, Bull PA. Forensic Geoscience and Crime detection: Identification, interpretation and presentation in forensic geoscience. 2007;127:73–90.http://www.geog.ox.ac.uk/staff/pbull_pub01.pdf
26
Morgan RM, Cohen J, McGookin I, et al. The relevance of the evolution of experimental studies for the interpretation and evaluation of some trace physical evidence. Science & Justice 2009;49:277–85. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2009.02.004
27
Morgan RM, Flynn J, Sena V, et al. Experimental forensic studies of the preservation of pollen in vehicle fires. Science & Justice 2014;54:141–5. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2013.04.001
28
Bull PA, Morgan RM, Sagovsky A, et al. The Transfer and Persistence of Trace Particulates: Experimental studies using clothing fabrics. Science & Justice 2006;46:185–95. doi:10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71592-1
29
Chisum WJ, Turvey BE. Crime Reconstruction. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: : Academic Press 2011. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780123864604
30
Dachs J, McNaught IJ, Robertson J. The persistence of human scalp hair on clothing fabrics. Forensic Science International 2003;138:27–36. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.07.014
31
Morgan RM, French JC, O’Donnell L, et al. The reincorporation and redistribution of trace geoforensic particulates on clothing: An introductory study. Science & Justice 2010;50:195–9. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2010.04.002
32
Pounds CA, Smalldon KW. The Transfer of Fibres between Clothing Materials During Simulated Contacts and their Persistence During Wear. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 1975;15:29–37. doi:10.1016/S0015-7368(75)70933-7
33
Sugita R, Marumo Y. Validity of color examination for forensic soil identification. Forensic Science International 1996;83:201–10. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(96)02038-5
34
Morgan RM, Flynn J, Sena V, et al. Experimental forensic studies of the preservation of pollen in vehicle fires. Science & Justice 2014;54:141–5. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2013.04.001
35
Morgan, RM. The spatial and temporal distribution of pollen in a room: forensic implications. Published Online First: 2014.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=UCL_EPR_DS1425730&context=L&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=local&query=any,contains,The%20spatial%20and%20temporal%20distribution%20of%20pollen%20in%20a%20room:%20Forensic%20implications&sortby=rank
36
The ‘CSI effect’. Published Online First: 2010.http://www.economist.com/node/15949089
37
Solved- Trace Evidence. 2008.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMmSCXzmxD4
38
Allen TJ, Scranage JK. The transfer of glass—part 1. Forensic Science International 1998;93:167–74. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00041-3
39
Allen TJ, Hoefler K, Rose S. The transfer of glass—part 3. Forensic Science International 1998;93:195–200. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00043-7
40
Schweitzer, N.J. THE CSI EFFECT: POPULAR FICTION ABOUT FORENSIC SCIENCE AFFECTS THE PUBLIC’S EXPECTATIONS ABOUT REAL FORENSIC SCIENCE. Jurimetrics;47:357–64.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_jstor_archive_1229762978&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2〈=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,HE%20CSI%20EFFECT:%20POPULAR%20FICTION%20ABOUT%20FORENSIC%20SCIENCE%20AFFECTS%20THE%20PUBLIC%27S%20EXPECTATIONS%20ABOUT%20REAL%20FORENSIC%20SCIENCE&sortby=rank
41
Dachs J, McNaught IJ, Robertson J. The persistence of human scalp hair on clothing fabrics. Forensic Science International 2003;138:27–36. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.07.014
42
French JC, Morgan RM, Baxendell P, et al. Multiple transfers of particulates and their dissemination within contact networks. Science & Justice 2012;52:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.05.001
43
French, J. The secondary transfer of gunshot residue: an experimental investigation carried out with SEM-EDX analysis. X-RAY SPECTROMETRY Published Online First: 2014.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=UCL_EPR_DS1422146&context=L&vid=UCL_VU2〈=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=local&query=any,contains,The%20secondary%20transfer%20of%20gunshot%20residue:%20an%20experimental%20investigation%20carried%20out%20with%20SEM-EDX%20analysis&sortby=rank
44
Grieve MC, Dunlop J, Haddock PS. Transfer experiments with acrylic fibres. Forensic Science International 1989;40:267–77. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(89)90185-0
45
Grieve MC. Glitter particles—an unusual source of trace evidence? Journal of the Forensic Science Society 1987;27:405–12. doi:10.1016/S0015-7368(87)72789-3
46
Garrett, Brandon L. Invalid forensic science testimony and wrongful convictions. Virginia Law Review;95:1–97.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_scopus2-s2.0-65349105013&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2〈=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Invalid%20Forensic%20Science%20Testimony%20and%20Wrongful%20Convictions&sortby=rank
47
Pringle JK, Ruffell A, Jervis JR, et al. The use of geoscience methods for terrestrial forensic searches. Earth-Science Reviews 2012;114:108–23. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.05.006
48
Ruffell A, McKinley J. Forensic geoscience: applications of geology, geomorphology and geophysics to criminal investigations. Earth-Science Reviews 2005;69:235–47. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.08.002
49
Ruffell A, Pringle JK, Forbes S. Search protocols for hidden forensic objects beneath floors and within walls. Forensic Science International 2014;237:137–45. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.036
50
Ruffell A, McKinley J. Forensic geomorphology. Geomorphology 2014;206:14–22. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.020
51
Bevan BW. The search for graves. 1991;56:1310–9.http://www.olemiss.edu/research/anthropology/haley/class2010/library/Bevan1991.pdf
52
G. Clark Davenport. Remote Sensing Applications in Forensic Investigations. Historical Archaeology 2001;35:87–100.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25616896?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Facc%3Don%26amp%3Bq6%3D%26amp%3Bf0%3Dall%26amp%3Bc4%3DAND%26amp%3Bc2%3DAND%26amp%3Bq1%3D%26amp%3Bc1%3DAND%26amp%3Bc3%3DAND%26amp%3Bf4%3Dall%26amp%3Bf1%3Dall%26amp%3Bsd%3D%26amp%3Bq5%3D%26amp%3Bf6%3Dall%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3Bpt%3D%26amp%3Bq4%3D%26amp%3Bc5%3DAND%26amp%3Bf3%3Dall%26amp%3Bisbn%3D%26amp%3Bed%3D%26amp%3Bf5%3Dall%26amp%3Bq2%3D%26amp%3Bq0%3D%2BRemote%2Bsensing%2Bapplications%2Bin%2Bforensic%2Binvestigations%26amp%3Bla%3D%26amp%3Bq3%3D%26amp%3Bc6%3DAND%26amp%3Bf2%3Dall&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
53
Fenning PJ, Donnelly LJ. Geophysical techniques for forensic investigation. 2004;232:11–20. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.232.01.03
54
Hansen JD, Pringle JK. Comparison of magnetic, electrical and ground penetrating radar surveys to detect buried forensic objects in semi-urban and domestic patio environments. 2013;384:229–51. doi:10.1144/SP384.13
55
Scott J, Hunter JR. Environmental influences on resistivity mapping for the location of clandestine graves. 2004;232:33–8. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.232.01.05
56
Beck, Richard A. Remote Sensing and GIS as Counterterrorism Tools in the Afghanistan War: A Case Study of the Zhawar Kili Region. The Professional Geographer;55. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.5502005
57
Pringle JK, Holland C, Szkornik K, et al. Establishing forensic search methodologies and geophysical surveying for the detection of clandestine graves in coastal beach environments. Forensic Science International 2012;219:e29–36. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.01.010
58
Morgan RM, Bull PA. Data Interpretation in Forensic Sediment and Soil Geochemistry. Environmental Forensics 2006;7:325–34. doi:10.1080/15275920600996248
59
Gepard GPR ground penetrating radar - Applications and functionality. 17AD.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQAeExJwjpE
60
SERIAL. https://serialpodcast.org/
61
Undisclosed. http://undisclosed-podcast.com/
62
The Murder Trial. https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/057FF632?bcast=98658101
63
Hanson ID. The importance of stratigraphy in forensic investigation. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2004;232:39–47. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.232.01.06
64
Holzer, Thomas L. Seismograms offer insight into Oklahoma City bombing. Eos;77.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_georef1997-016939&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2〈=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Seismograms%20Offer%20Insight%20Into%20Oklahoma%20City%20Bombing&sortby=rank
65
Koper KD, Wallace TC, Taylor SR, et al. Forensic seismology and the sinking of the Kursk [\textit{Kursk}]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 2001;82:37–37. doi:10.1029/01EO00023
66
Scott J, Hunter JR. Environmental influences on resistivity mapping for the location of clandestine graves. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2004;232:33–8. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.232.01.05
67
Bull PA, Parker A, Morgan RM. The forensic analysis of soils and sediment taken from the cast of a footprint. Forensic Science International 2006;162:6–12. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.075
68
Bull PA, Morgan RM. Sediment Fingerprints: A forensic technique using quartz sand grains. Science & Justice 2006;46:107–24. doi:10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71581-7
69
Dawson LA, Hillier S. Measurement of soil characteristics for forensic applications. Surface and Interface Analysis 2010;42:363–77. doi:10.1002/sia.3315
70
Morgan RM, Robertson J, Lennard C, et al. Quartz grain surface textures of soils and sediments from Canberra, Australia: A forensic reconstruction tool. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 2010;42:169–79. doi:10.1080/00450610903258110
71
Bailey MJ, Morgan RM, Comini P, et al. Evaluation of Particle-Induced X-ray Emission and Particle-Induced γ-ray Emission of Quartz Grains for Forensic Trace Sediment Analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2012;84:2260–7. doi:10.1021/ac2028722
72
Konopinski DI, Hudziak S, Morgan RM, et al. Investigation of quartz grain surface textures by atomic force microscopy for forensic analysis. Forensic Science International 2012;223:245–55. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.09.011
73
Newell AJ, Morgan RM, Griffin LD, et al. Automated Texture Recognition of Quartz Sand Grains for Forensic Applications*. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2012;57:1285–9. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02126.x
74
Sugita R, Marumo Y. Screening of soil evidence by a combination of simple techniques: validity of particle size distribution. Forensic Science International 2001;122:155–8. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00490-X
75
Morgan RM, Bull PA. The philosophy, nature and practice of forensic sediment analysis. Progress in Physical Geography 2007;31:43–58. doi:10.1177/0309133307073881
76
Newell AJ, Morgan RM, Griffin LD, et al. Automated Texture Recognition of Quartz Sand Grains for Forensic Applications*. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2012;57:1285–9. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02126.x
77
Inspecting Detectives, The Long Shadow of the World’s End. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06cy69y
78
Green N. Get ready for CSI: Soil. Published Online First: 2011.https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2011/sep/13/forensic-science-content-transference
79
1969 FBI Soil Exam Video. 8AD.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Op0-A752IY
80
The Soil Sleuth. 21AD.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyurHTD2Kro
81
Zala, Krista. Dirty Science: Soil Forensics Digs into New Techniques. Science;318:386–7.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_jstor_archive_2320051376&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2〈=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Dirty%20Science:%20Soil%20Forensics%20Digs%20Into%20New%20Techniques&sortby=rank
82
Bull PA, Morgan RM, Freudiger-Bonzon J. A critique of the present use of some geochemical techniques in geoforensic analysis. Forensic Science International 2008;178:e35–40. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.09.003
83
Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller D. Criminal and environmental soil forensics. [Dordrecht?]: : Springer 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=417347
84
Pye K, Blott SJ, Croft DJ, et al. Forensic comparison of soil samples: Assessment of small-scale spatial variability in elemental composition, carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios, colour, and particle size distribution. Forensic Science International 2006;163:59–80. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.008
85
Rawlins BG, Cave M. Investigating multi-element soil geochemical signatures and their potential for use in forensic studies. 2004;232:197–206. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.232.01.18
86
McCulloch G, Dawson LA, Brewer MJ, et al. The identification of markers for Geoforensic HPLC profiling at close proximity sites. Forensic Science International 2017;272:127–41. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.01.009
87
Cheshire K, Morgan RM, Holmes J. The potential for geochemical discrimination of single- and mixed-source soil samples from close proximity urban parkland locations. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 2017;49:161–74. doi:10.1080/00450618.2016.1144789
88
Bell S. Forensic chemistry. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: : Pearson Prentice Hall 2006.
89
Saferstein R. Criminalistics: an introduction to forensic science. Edition 11, global edition. Boston: : Pearson 2015.
90
Saferstein R. Criminalistics: an introduction to forensic science. Edition 11, global edition. Boston: : Pearson 2015.
91
Muccio Z, Jackson GP. Isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The Analyst 2009;134:213–22. doi:10.1039/B808232D
92
Pye K, Croft D. Forensic analysis of soil and sediment traces by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis: An experimental investigation. Forensic Science International 2007;165:52–63. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.03.001
93
Croft DJ, Pye K. The potential use of continuous-flow isotope-ratio mass spectrometry as a tool in forensic soil analysis: a preliminary report. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 2003;17:2581–4. doi:10.1002/rcm.1174
94
Reidy L, Bu K, Godfrey M, et al. Elemental fingerprinting of soils using ICP-MS and multivariate statistics: A study for and by forensic chemistry majors. Forensic Science International 2013;233:37–44. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.08.019
95
Quaak FCA, Kuiper I. Statistical data analysis of bacterial t-RFLP profiles in forensic soil comparisons. Forensic Science International 2011;210:96–101. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.02.005
96
Young JM, Weyrich LS, Cooper A. Forensic soil DNA analysis using high-throughput sequencing: A comparison of four molecular markers. Forensic Science International: Genetics 2014;13:176–84. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.014
97
Amendt J, Campobasso CP, Gaudry E, et al. Best practice in forensic entomology—standards and guidelines. International Journal of Legal Medicine 2007;121:90–104. doi:10.1007/s00414-006-0086-x
98
Amendt J, Richards CS, Campobasso CP, et al. Forensic entomology: applications and limitations. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology 2011;7:379–92. doi:10.1007/s12024-010-9209-2
99
Márquez-Grant N, Roberts J, editors. Forensic Ecology Handbook. Chichester, UK: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2012. doi:10.1002/9781118374016
100
Bugelli V, Forni D, Bassi LA, et al. Forensic Entomology and the Estimation of the Minimum Time Since Death in Indoor Cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2015;60:525–31. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12647
101
Catts EP, Goff ML. Forensic Entomology in Criminal Investigations. Annual Review of Entomology 1992;37:253–72. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001345
102
Bernard Greenberg. Flies as Forensic Indicators. Journal of Medical Entomology 1991;28:565–77.http://jme.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/5/565.long
103
Maehly A, Williams RL, editors. Forensic Science Progress 5. Berlin, Heidelberg: : Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1991. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58233-2
104
Catching History’s Criminals: The Forensics Story. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02tydb7
105
Abdulla S. The buzzing detective. news@nature Published Online First: 23 September 1999. doi:10.1038/news990923-2
106
From Eggs to Maggots. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/crime-scene-creatures-video-from-eggs-to-maggots/5209/
107
Forensic entomology - The crime scene (Wellcome Collection). 5AD.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIVKISCmjTQ
108
Cameron NG. The use of diatom analysis in forensic geoscience. 2004;232:277–80. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.232.01.25
109
Peabody AJ, Cameron NG. Forensic science and diatoms. In: Smol JP, Stoermer EF, eds. The Diatoms. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. 534–9. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511763175.030
110
Scott KR, Morgan RM, Jones VJ, et al. The transferability of diatoms to clothing and the methods appropriate for their collection and analysis in forensic geoscience. Forensic Science International 2014;241:127–37. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.05.011
111
Cox EJ. Diatoms and Forensic Science. In: Márquez-Grant N, Roberts J, eds. Forensic Ecology Handbook. Chichester, UK: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2012. 141–51. doi:10.1002/9781118374016.ch9
112
Piette MHA, De Letter EA. Drowning: Still a difficult autopsy diagnosis. Forensic Science International 2006;163:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.10.027
113
Pollanen MS. Diatoms and homicide. Forensic Science International 1998;91:29–34. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00162-X
114
Siver PA, Lord WD, McCarthy DJ. Forensic Limnology: The Use of Freshwater Algal Community Ecology to Link Suspects to an Aquatic Crime Scene in Southern New England. 1994;39:847–53.https://compass.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/JFS/PAGES/JFS13663J.htm
115
Zimmerman KA, Wallace JR. The Potential to Determine a Postmortem Submersion Interval Based on AlgalDiatom Diversity on Decomposing Mammalian Carcasses in Brackish Ponds in Delaware. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2008;53:935–41. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00748.x
116
Crime Scene Creatures - Diatom Detective (PBS). http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/crime-scene-creatures-video-diatom-detective/5208/
117
Forensic Files Historic Cases Reel Danger. 13AD.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXcYpd1iacM
118
Brock JH, Norris DO. Forensic botany: an under-utilized resource. 1997;42:364–7.https://compass.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/JFS/PAGES/JFS14130J.htm
119
Horrocks M, Walsh KAJ. Forensic palynology: assessing the value of the evidence. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 1998;103:69–74. doi:10.1016/S0034-6667(98)00027-X
120
Mildenhall DC, Wiltshire PEJ, Bryant VM. Forensic palynology: Why do it and how it works. Forensic Science International 2006;163:163–72. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.012
121
Brown AG. The use of forensic botany and geology in war crimes investigations in NE Bosnia. Forensic Science International 2006;163:204–10. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.025
122
Hawksworth DL, Wiltshire PEJ. Forensic mycology: the use of fungi in criminal investigations. Forensic Science International 2011;206:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.06.012
123
Mildenhall DC. Hypericum pollen determines the presence of burglars at the scene of a crime: An example of forensic palynology. Forensic Science International 2006;163:231–5. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.028
124
Wiltshire PEJ. Consideration of some taphonomic variables of relevance to forensic palynological investigation in the United Kingdom. Forensic Science International 2006;163:173–82. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.011
125
Plant detectives: How brambles can help solve murder cases - Dr Mark Spencer. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/5q2xGXDZv0S7hg3KQl11vNg/plant-detectives-how-bramble-and-co-can-help-solve-crimes
126
Crime Scene Creatures - Counting Rings to Catch a Murderer (PBS). http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/crime-scene-creatures-video-counting-rings-to-catch-a-murderer/5207/
127
Jonathan Drori: Every pollen grain has a story. 8AD.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXDJ-nAykKE&feature=youtu.be
128
Márquez-Grant N, Roberts J. Forensic ecology handbook: from crime scene to court. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3189830300004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
129
Micropalaeontological Society. The archaeological and forensic applications of microfossils: a deeper understanding of human history. London: : Published for the Micropalaeontological Society by the Geological Society 2017.
130
Missing Persons. Routledge 2016. doi:10.4324/9781315595603
131
Cox M. The scientific investigation of mass graves: towards protocols and standard operating procedures. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2008.
132
Brown, Antony G. The combined use of pollen and soil analyses in a search and subsequent murder investigation. Journal of Forensic Sciences;47:614–8.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_scopus2-s2.0-0036100201&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,The%20combined%20use%20of%20pollen%20and%20petrologic%20analyses%20in%20a%20search%20and%20subsequent%20murder%20investigation&sortby=rank&offset=0
133
Bryant VM, Jones GD. Forensic palynology: Current status of a rarely used technique in the United States of America. Forensic Science International 2006;163:183–97. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.021
134
Bryant VM, Jones JG, Mildenhall DC. Forensic palynology in the United States of America. Palynology 1990;14:193–208. doi:10.1080/01916122.1990.9989380
135
Horrocks, Mark. Forensic palynology: Variation in the pollen content of soil surface samples. Journal of Forensic Sciences;43.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest219694836&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Forensic%20palynology:%20variation%20in%20the%20pollen%20content%20of%20soil%20surface%20samples&sortby=rank
136
Horrocks, Mark. Fine resolution of pollen patterns in limited space: Differentiating a crime scene and alibi scene seven meters apart. Journal of Forensic Sciences;44:417–20.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest219695512&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Fine%20resolution%20of%20pollen%20patterns%20in%20limited%20space:%20differentiating%20a%20crime%20scene%20and%20alibi%20scene%20seven%20meters%20apart.&sortby=rank
137
Jantunen J, Saarinen K. Pollen transport by clothes. Aerobiologia 2011;27:339–43. doi:10.1007/s10453-011-9200-8
138
Mildenhall DC. Forensic palynology in New Zealand. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 1990;64:227–34. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(90)90137-8
139
Pye K, Croft DJ, Geological Society of London. Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications. London: : Geological Society 2004.
140
Riding, Jb. Changes in soil pollen assemblages on footwear worn at different sites. Palynology;31:135–51.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_wos000252435100014&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Riding%20JB,%20Rawlins%20BG,%20Coley%20KH.%20Changes%20in%20soil%20pollen%20assemblages%20on%20footwear%20worn%20at%20different%20sites.%20Palynology%202007;31:135%E2%80%93151.&sortby=rank
141
Ruffell A. Forensic pedology, forensic geology, forensic geoscience, geoforensics and soil forensics. Forensic Science International 2010;202:9–12. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.044
142
Ruffell A, Wiltshire P. Conjunctive use of quantitative and qualitative X-ray diffraction analysis of soils and rocks for forensic analysis. Forensic Science International 2004;145:13–23. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.03.017
143
Wiltshire PEJ. Consideration of some taphonomic variables of relevance to forensic palynological investigation in the United Kingdom. Forensic Science International 2006;163:173–82. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.011
144
Wiltshire PEJ, Black S. The cribriform approach to the retrieval of palynological evidence from the turbinates of murder victims. Forensic Science International 2006;163:224–30. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.019
145
Zavada MS, McGraw SM, Miller MA. The role of clothing fabrics as passive pollen collectors in the north‐eastern United States. Grana 2007;46:285–91. doi:10.1080/00173130701780104
146
Hawksworth DL, Wiltshire PEJ. Forensic mycology: the use of fungi in criminal investigations. Forensic Science International 2011;206:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.06.012
147
Etienne D, Jouffroy-Bapicot I. Optimal counting limit for fungal spore abundance estimation using Sporormiella as a case study. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 2014;23:743–9. doi:10.1007/s00334-014-0439-1
148
Moore PD, Webb JA, Collinson ME. Pollen analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Blackwell Scientific Publications 1991.
149
Nakagawa, T. Dense-media separation as a more efficient pollen extraction method for use with organic sediment/deposit samples: comparison with the conventional method. Boreas;27:15–24.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_wos000073443500002&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Nakagawa,%20T.%20Brugiapaglia,%20E.,%20Digerfeldt,%20G.%20Reille,%20M.%20De%20Beaulieu,%20J-L.%20and.%20Yasuda,%20Y%201998.%20Dense-media%20separation%20as%20a%20more%20efficient%20pollen%20extraction%20method%20for%20use%20with%20organic%20sediment%2Fdeposit%20samples:%20comparison%20with%20the%20conventional%20method.%20Boreas%2027,&sortby=rank
150
Ruffell A, McKinley J. Geoforensics. Chichester, UK: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2008. doi:10.1002/9780470758854
151
Dent BB, Forbes SL, Stuart BH. Review of human decomposition processes in soil. Environmental Geology 2004;45:576–85. doi:10.1007/s00254-003-0913-z
152
Forbes SL, Stuart BH, Dent BB. The identification of adipocere in grave soils. Forensic Science International 2002;127:225–30. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00127-5
153
Forbes SL, Stuart BH, Dent BB. The effect of the burial environment on adipocere formation. Forensic Science International 2005;154:24–34. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.107
154
Forbes SL, Dent BB, Stuart BH. The effect of soil type on adipocere formation. Forensic Science International 2005;154:35–43. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.108
155
Haglund W, Sorg M, editors. Forensic Taphonomy. CRC Press 1996. doi:10.1201/9781439821923
156
Stover E, Haglund WD, Samuels M. Exhumation of Mass Graves in Iraq. JAMA 2003;290. doi:10.1001/jama.290.5.663
157
Tibbett M, Carter DO, editors. Soil analysis in forensic taphonomy : chemical and biological effects of buried human remains. Boca Raton, Florida: : CRC 2008. http://explore.bl.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=moreTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=BLL01014458757&indx=1&recIds=BLL01014458757&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%3A%28BLCONTENT%29&frbg=&tab=local_tab&dstmp=1477944307615&srt=rank&mode=Basic&vl(488279563UI0)=any&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=soil%20analysis%20in%20forensic%20taphonomy%20chemical%20and%20biological%20effects%20of%20buried%20human%20remains&vid=BLVU1
158
The fascinating process of human decomposition. 2014.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFJrow7yaec&feature=youtu.be
159
Waxing Historical: A Potted History of Adipocere. 12AD.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apLz4uT6jWY&feature=youtu.be
160
Anderson GS, Hobischak NR. Decomposition of carrion in the marine environment in British Columbia, Canada. International Journal of Legal Medicine 2004;118. doi:10.1007/s00414-004-0447-2
161
Delabarde T, Keyser C, Tracqui A, et al. The potential of forensic analysis on human bones found in riverine environment. Forensic Science International 2013;228:e1–5. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.019
162
Keiper JB, Casamatta DA. Benthic organisms as forensic indicators. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 2001;20:311–24. doi:10.2307/1468325
163
Parker R, Ruffell A, Hughes D, et al. Geophysics and the search of freshwater bodies: A review. Science & Justice 2010;50:141–9. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2009.09.001
164
Dickson GC, Poulter RTM, Maas EW, et al. Marine bacterial succession as a potential indicator of postmortem submersion interval. Forensic Science International 2011;209:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.10.016
165
Magni PA, Venn C, Aquila I, et al. Evaluation of the floating time of a corpse found in a marine environment using the barnacle Lepas anatifera L. (Crustacea: Cirripedia: Pedunculata). Forensic Science International 2015;247:e6–10. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.11.016
166
Mateus M, de Pablo H, Vaz N. An investigation on body displacement after two drowning accidents. Forensic Science International 2013;229:e6–12. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.010
167
Merritt RW, Wallace JR. The role of aquatic insects in forensic investigations. In: Byrd JH, Castner JL, eds. Forensic entomology : the utility of arthropods in legal investigations. Boca Raton: : CRC Press 2000. 271–320.http://explore.bl.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=moreTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=BLL01010447216&indx=1&recIds=BLL01010447216&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%3A%28BLCONTENT%29&frbg=&tab=local_tab&dstmp=1477947071905&srt=rank&mode=Basic&vl(488279563UI0)=any&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=Forensic%20entomology%3B%20the%20utility%20of%20arthropods%20in%20legal%20investigations.&vid=BLVU1
168
Ruffell A. Under-water Scene Investigation Using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in the Search for a Sunken Jet ski, Northern Ireland. Science & Justice 2006;46:221–30. doi:10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71602-1
169
Police Divers & Underwater Investigations. http://lawofficer.com/archive/police-divers-underwater-investigations/
170
Underwater Forensics (Science Channel). http://www.sciencechannel.com/tv-shows/science-channel-presents/videos/discoveries-this-week-underwater-forensics/
171
Underwater Forensics Robot on Beyond Tomorrow. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2xj6jp
172
Flanagan RJ. Cut Costs at All Costs! Forensic Science International 2018;290:e26–8. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.038
173
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 2012;9:671–5. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089
174
Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, et al. A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework. Science & Justice 1998;38:231–9. doi:10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72117-3
175
White P. Crime scene to court: the essentials of forensic science. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: : Royal Society of Chemistry 2004.
176
Reference and Research Book News. 2001;16.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest199526850&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Houck,%20M.%20M.%20(2001).%20Mute%20witnesses:%20Trace%20evidence%20analysis:%20Academic%20Press.&sortby=rank
177
Inman K, Rudin N. The origin of evidence. Forensic Science International 2002;126:11–6. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00031-2
178
Evett IW, Berger CEH, Buckleton JS, et al. Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US—A commentary on the PCAST report. Forensic Science International 2017;278:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.018
179
Morgan RM, Wiltshire P, Parker A, et al. The role of forensic geoscience in wildlife crime detection. Forensic Science International 2006;162:152–62. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.045
180
Morgan, RM. Conceptualising forensic science and forensic reconstruction. Part I: A conceptual model. 2017. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=UCL_EPR_DS1563693&context=L&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=local&query=any,contains,Morgan,%20R.%20M.%20(2017).%20Conceptualising%20forensic%20science%20and%20forensic%20reconstruction.%20Part%20I:%20A%20conceptual%20model.%20Science%20&%20Justice,%2057(6),%20455-459.&sortby=rank
181
Ruffell A, McKinley J. Geoforensics. Chichester, UK: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2008. doi:10.1002/9780470758854
182
Bull PA, Morgan RM, Sagovsky A, et al. The Transfer and Persistence of Trace Particulates: Experimental studies using clothing fabrics. Science & Justice 2006;46:185–95. doi:10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71592-1
183
French JC, Morgan RM, Baxendell P, et al. Multiple transfers of particulates and their dissemination within contact networks. Science & Justice 2012;52:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.05.001
184
Morgan RM, Davies G, Balestri F, et al. The recovery of pollen evidence from documents and its forensic implications. Science & Justice 2013;53:375–84. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2013.03.004
185
Morgan, RM. The forensic analysis of sediments recovered from footwear. In: Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics. Springer 2009. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/44UCL_INST/167dvkm/alma9931231541804761
186
Slot A, van der Weerd J, Roos M, et al. Tracers as invisible evidence — The transfer and persistence of flock fibres during a car exchange. Forensic Science International 2017;275:178–86. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.03.005
187
Analyzing fluorescence microscopy images with ImageJ. http://www.microscopist.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ImageJ_FL_Image_Analysis.pdf
188
Kloster, Michael. Fragilariopsis kerguelensis images from sediment core PS1768-8, supplement to: Kloster, Michael; Kauer, Gerhard; Beszteri, Bánk (2014): SHERPA: an image segmentation and outline feature extraction tool for diatoms and other objects. BMC Bioinformatics, 15(1), 218. PANGAEA - Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science 2014. doi:b>10.1594/PANGAEA.833665
189
Kloster, Michael. Measurements of valves of the diatom Fragilariopsis kerguelensis from Southern Ocean sediment core PS1768-8, supplement to: Kloster, Michael; Kauer, Gerhard; Esper, Oliver; Fuchs, Nike; Beszteri, Bánk (2018): Morphometry of the diatom Fragilariopsis kerguelensis from Southern Ocean sediment: High-throughput measurements show second morphotype occurring during glacials. Marine Micropaleontology. 2018. doi:b>10.1594/PANGAEA.892593
190
Levin EA, Morgan RM, Griffin LD, et al. A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials. Journal of Forensic Sciences Published Online First: 25 October 2018. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13938
191
Levin EA, Morgan RM, Griffin LD, et al. A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials. Journal of Forensic Sciences Published Online First: 25 October 2018. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13938
192
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 2012;9:671–5. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089
193
Schulze K, Tillich UM, Dandekar T, et al. PlanktoVision – an automated analysis system for the identification of phytoplankton. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-115
194
Cox MR, Budhu M. A practical approach to grain shape quantification. Engineering Geology 2008;96:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.05.005
195
Cox MR, Budhu M. A practical approach to grain shape quantification. Engineering Geology 2008;96:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.05.005
196
Igathinathane C, Pordesimo LO, Columbus EP, et al. Sieveless particle size distribution analysis of particulate materials through computer vision. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2009;66:147–58. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2009.01.005
197
Mazzoli A, Favoni O. Particle size, size distribution and morphological evaluation of airborne dust particles of diverse woods by Scanning Electron Microscopy and image processing program. Powder Technology 2012;225:65–71. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2012.03.033
198
Mazzoli A, Moriconi G. Particle size, size distribution and morphological evaluation of glass fiber reinforced plastic (GRP) industrial by-product. Micron 2014;67:169–78. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2014.07.007
