1
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
2
Caramani, Danièle. Comparative politics. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
3
Newton, Kenneth, Deth, Jan W. van. Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010.
4
Zuckerman, Alan S., Lichbach, Mark Irving. Comparative politics: rationality, culture, and structure. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
5
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
6
Collier D. The Comparative Method. In: Political Science:  The State of Discipline II. American Political Science Association 1993. 105–19.
7
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2004.
8
Gerring J. Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
9
Kellstedt, Paul M., Whitten, Guy D. The fundamentals of political science research. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.
10
King, Gary, Verba, Sidney, Keohane, Robert O. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1994.
11
Lijphart A. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review 1971;65:682–93.
12
Ragin CC. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 2008.
13
Shadish, William R., Campbell, Donald T., Cook, Thomas D. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: : Houghton Mifflin 2002.
14
Elster J. Chapter 3 - Rational choice. In: Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989. 22–9.
15
David J. Elkins and Richard E. B. Simeon. A Cause in Search of Its Effect, or What Does Political Culture Explain? Comparative Politics 1979;11:127–45.
16
March JG, Olsen JP. Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions. Governance 1996;9:247–64.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1996.tb00242.x/abstract
17
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
18
Green DP, Shapiro I. Chapter 5 - Social dilemmas and free-riding. In: Pathologies of rational choice theory: a critique of applications in political science. London: : Yale University Press 1994.
19
John H. Aldrich. Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 1993;Vol. 37:246–78.
20
Almond, Gabriel A., Verba, Sidney. The Civic culture revisited. Newbury Park, Calif: : Sage Publications 1989.
21
David P. Baron and John A. Ferejohn. Bargaining in Legislatures. The American Political Science Review 1989;83:1181–206.
22
Downs, Anthony. An economic theory of democracy. New York: : Harper & Row 1957.
23
Elster, Jon. Rational choice. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1986.
24
Elster, Jon. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
25
Green, Donald P., Shapiro, Ian. Pathologies of rational choice theory: a critique of applications in political science. London: : Yale University Press 1994.
26
Inglehart R, Baker WE. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review 2000;65. doi:10.2307/2657288
27
Jackman RW. Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. The American Political Science Review 1987;81. doi:10.2307/1961959
28
Robert W. Jackman and Ross A. Miller. A Renaissance of Political Culture? American Journal of Political Science 1996;40:632–59.
29
Chalmers Johnson. Preconception vs. Observation, or the Contributions of Rational Choice Theory and Area Studies to Contemporary Political Science. PS: Political Science and Politics 1997;Vol. 30:170–4.
30
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Fuchs, Dieter, Zielonka, Jan. Democracy and political culture in Eastern Europe. London: : Routledge 2006.
31
Leeds BA. Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation. American Journal of Political Science 1999;43:979–1002.
32
North DC. Institutions and Credible Commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 1993;149:11–23.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40751576
33
North DC, Weingast BR. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History 1989;49.http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4161868&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0022050700009451
34
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. London: : Harvard University Press 1971.
35
Ostrom E. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 1999;2:493–535. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493
36
Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert, Nanetti, Raffaella. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1993. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400820740
37
Lucian W. Pye. Political Culture Revisited. Political Psychology 1991;12:487–508.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3791758
38
George Rabinowitz and Stuart Elaine Macdonald. A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. The American Political Science Review 1989;Vol. 83:93–121.
39
William H. Riker and Peter C. Ordeshook. A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. The American Political Science Review 1968;62:25–42.
40
Shepsle KA. Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models. American Journal of Political Science 1979;23:27–59.
41
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
42
Herbst JI. States and power in Africa: comparative lessons in authority and control. Chichester: : Princeton University Press 2000.
43
Bates RH. When things fell apart: state failure in late-century Africa. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008.
44
Evans P. The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization. World Politics 1997;50:62–87.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054027
45
Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Skocpol, Theda. Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
46
Haggard, Stephan, Kaufman, Robert R. The Politics of economic adjustment: international constraints, distributive conflicts, and the state. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1992.
47
Robert H. Jackson and Carl G. Rosberg. Why Africa’s Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood. World Politics 1982;35:1–24.
48
Melleuish G. The State in World History: Perspectives and Problems. Australian Journal of Politics and History 2002;48:322–35. doi:10.1111/1467-8497.00263
49
Slaughter A-M. The Real New World Order. Foreign Affairs 1997;76. doi:10.2307/20048208
50
Tilly, Charles. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Revised pbk. ed. Cambridge, MA: : Blackwell 1992.
51
Vu T. Studying the State through State Formation. World Politics 2010;62.http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=6866180&fulltextType=RV&fileId=S0043887109990244
52
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
53
Schmitter PC, Karl TL. What Democracy Is. . . and Is Not. Journal of Democracy 1991;2:75–88. doi:10.1353/jod.1991.0033
54
Collier D, Adcock R. Democracy and dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts. Annual Review of Political Science 1999;2:537–65. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.537
55
Boix C. Democracy, Development, and the International System. American Political Science Review 2011;105:809–28. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000402
56
Cheibub JA, Gandhi J, Vreeland JR. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice 2009;143:67–101. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2
57
Dahl, Robert Alan. Polyarchy: participation and opposition. London: : Yale University Press 1971.
58
Diamond LJ. Three Paradoxes of Democracy. Journal of Democracy 1990;1:48–60. doi:10.1353/jod.1990.0047
59
Diamond LJ, Morlino L. The Quality of Democracy:  An Overview. Journal of Democracy 2004;15:20–31. doi:10.1353/jod.2004.0060
60
Munck G, Verkuilen J. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies 2002;35:5–34. doi:10.1177/001041400203500101
61
Olson M. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. The American Political Science Review 1993;87:567–76.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938736
62
Pemstein D, Meserve S, Melton J. Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type. Political Analysis 2010;18:426–49. doi:10.1093/pan/mpq020
63
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. 5th ed. London: : Allen and Unwin 1976.
64
Barry R. Weingast. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. The American Political Science Review 1997;91:245–63.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2952354
65
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
66
Samuel P. Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs 1993;72:22–49.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20045621
67
Acemoglu, Daron, Robinson, James A. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2006.
68
Boix C, Stokes SC. Endogenous Democratization. World Politics 2003;55:517–49. doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0019
69
Diamond LJ. Three Paradoxes of Democracy. Journal of Democracy 1990;1:48–60. doi:10.1353/jod.1990.0047
70
Linz, Juan J., Stepan, Alfred C. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins University Press 1996.
71
Lipset SM. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 1959;53:69–105. doi:10.2307/1951731
72
O’Donnell, Guillermo A., Schmitter, Philippe C., Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Transitions from authoritarian rule: tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins University Press 1986.
73
Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the market: political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1991.
74
Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and development: political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
75
Rustow DA. Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics 1970;2. doi:10.2307/421307
76
Svolik M. Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation. American Political Science Review 2008;102. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080143
77
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
78
Cheibub JA. Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
79
Druckman JN, Roberts A. Context and Coalition-Bargaining: Comparing Portfolio Allocation in Eastern and Western Europe. Party Politics 2005;11:535–55. doi:10.1177/1354068805054979
80
Duverger M. A new political system model: semi-presidential government. European Journal of Political Research 1980;8:165–87.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00569.x/abstract
81
Laver, Michael, Schofield, Norman. Multiparty government: the politics of coalition in Europe. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 1998.
82
Lijphart A. Power-sharing versus Majority Rule: Patterns of Cabinet Formation in Twenty Democracies. Government and Opposition 1981;16:395–413. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.1981.tb00319.x
83
Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. London: : Yale University Press 1999.
84
Linz, Juan J. (Juan José). The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 1990;1:51–69.
85
Sartori G. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. 2nd ed. Washington Square, N.Y.: : New York University Press 1997.
86
Siaroff A. Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction. European Journal of Political Research 2003;42:287–312.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.00084/abstract
87
Strom K. Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies 1984;17:199–227. doi:10.1177/0010414084017002004
88
Paul V. Warwick and James N. Druckman. Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments. British Journal of Political Science 2001;31:627–49.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593295
89
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
90
Immergut EM. The Swedish Constitution and Social Democratic Power: Measuring the Mechanical Effect of a Political Institution. Scandinavian Political Studies 2002;25:231–57. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.00070
91
Cox, Gary W. Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
92
Horowitz DL. Electoral Systems: A Primer for Decision Makers. Journal of Democracy 2003;14:115–27.http://search.proquest.com/docview/195554884/C10D89C4FD5548A1PQ/11?accountid=14511
93
Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. London: : Yale University Press 1999.
94
Norris, Pippa. Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behavior. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
95
Reynolds A, Reilly B, Ellis A, et al. Electoral system design: the new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm: : International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2005.
96
William H. Riker. The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law. Comparative Politics 1976;9:93–106.
97
Sartori G. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. 2nd ed. Washington Square, N.Y.: : New York University Press 1997.
98
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
99
North DC, Weingast BR. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History 1989;49.http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4161868&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0022050700009451
100
Clarke G, Beck T, Keefer P, et al. New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Publications 1999. http://www.worldbank.icebox.ingenta.com/content/wb/wps4301/1999/00000001/00000001/art02283
101
Gehlbach S, Malesky EJ. The Contribution of Veto Players to Economic Reform. The Journal of Politics 2010;72:957–75. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000460
102
Hallerberg M, Basinger S. Internationalization and Changes in Tax Policy in OECD Countries: The Importance of Domestic Veto Players. Comparative Political Studies 1998;31:321–52. doi:10.1177/0010414098031003003
103
Henisz WJ. Politics and international investment: measuring risks and protecting profits. Cheltenham, UK: : E. Elgar 2002.
104
KEEFER P, STASAVAGE D. The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy. American Political Science Review 2003;97. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000777
105
Stasavage D. Private Investment and Political Institutions. Economics and Politics 2002;14:41–63. doi:10.1111/1468-0343.00099
106
Tsebelis G. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 1995;25.http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=3279628&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0007123400007225
107
Tsebelis G. Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis. The American Political Science Review 1999;93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2585576
108
Tsebelis G, Russell Sage Foundation. Veto players: how political institutions work. New York: : Russell Sage Foundation 2002.
109
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: : CQ Press 2009.
110
Gandhi J, Przeworski A. Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. Comparative Political Studies 2007;40:1279–301. doi:10.1177/0010414007305817
111
Malesky E, Schuler P. The Single-Party Dictator’s Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2011;36:491–530. doi:10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00025.x
112
Brooker, Paul. Non-democratic regimes. Revised and updated 2nd ed. New York: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
113
Brzezinski Z. Totalitarianism and Rationality. The American Political Science Review 1956;50. doi:10.2307/1951557
114
Gandhi, Jennifer. Political institutions under dictatorship. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2008.
115
Geddes B. What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science 1999;2:115–44. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
116
Lai B, Slater D. Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950-1992. American Journal of Political Science 2006;50:113–26. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00173.x
117
Levitsky S, Way L. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 2002;13:51–65. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0026
118
Malesky E, Schuler P. Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review 2010;104:482–502. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000250
119
Schedler, Andreas. Electoral authoritarianism: the dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner Publishers 2006.
120
Milan W. Svolik. The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
121
Wintrobe, Ronald. The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
122
Wright J. Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science 2008;52:322–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00315.x