1.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
2.
Caramani, Danièle. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
3.
Newton, Kenneth, Deth, Jan W. van. Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
4.
Zuckerman, Alan S., Lichbach, Mark Irving. Comparative politics: rationality, culture, and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
5.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
6.
Collier D. The Comparative Method. Political Science:  The State of Discipline II. American Political Science Association; 1993. p. 105–119.
7.
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.
8.
Gerring J. Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
9.
Kellstedt, Paul M., Whitten, Guy D. The fundamentals of political science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
10.
King, Gary, Verba, Sidney, Keohane, Robert O. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1994.
11.
Lijphart A. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review. 1971;65(3):682–693.
12.
Ragin CC. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 2008.
13.
Shadish, William R., Campbell, Donald T., Cook, Thomas D. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2002.
14.
Elster J. Chapter 3 - Rational choice. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. p. 22–29.
15.
David J. Elkins and Richard E. B. Simeon. A Cause in Search of Its Effect, or What Does Political Culture Explain? Comparative Politics. Ph.D. Program in Political Science of the City University of New York; 1979;11(2):127–145.
16.
March JG, Olsen JP. Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions. Governance [Internet]. Oxford : B. Blackwell; 1996 Jul;9(3):247–264. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1996.tb00242.x/abstract
17.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
18.
Green DP, Shapiro I. Chapter 5 - Social dilemmas and free-riding. Pathologies of rational choice theory: a critique of applications in political science. London: Yale University Press; 1994.
19.
John H. Aldrich. Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science. Midwest Political Science Association; 1993;Vol. 37(1):246–278.
20.
Almond, Gabriel A., Verba, Sidney. The Civic culture revisited. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1989.
21.
David P. Baron and John A. Ferejohn. Bargaining in Legislatures. The American Political Science Review. American Political Science Association; 1989;83(4):1181–1206.
22.
Downs, Anthony. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row; 1957.
23.
Elster, Jon. Rational choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1986.
24.
Elster, Jon. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
25.
Green, Donald P., Shapiro, Ian. Pathologies of rational choice theory: a critique of applications in political science. London: Yale University Press; 1994.
26.
Inglehart R, Baker WE. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review. 2000;65(1).
27.
Jackman RW. Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. The American Political Science Review. 1987;81(2).
28.
Robert W. Jackman and Ross A. Miller. A Renaissance of Political Culture? American Journal of Political Science. Midwest Political Science Association; 1996;40(3):632–659.
29.
Chalmers Johnson. Preconception vs. Observation, or the Contributions of Rational Choice Theory and Area Studies to Contemporary Political Science. PS: Political Science and Politics. American Political Science Association; 1997;Vol. 30(2):170–174.
30.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Fuchs, Dieter, Zielonka, Jan. Democracy and political culture in Eastern Europe. London: Routledge; 2006.
31.
Leeds BA. Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation. American Journal of Political Science. Midwest Political Science Association; 1999 Oct;43(4):979–1002.
32.
North DC. Institutions and Credible Commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft [Internet]. Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG; 1993 Mar;149(1):11–23. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40751576
33.
North DC, Weingast BR. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History [Internet]. Economic History Association at the University of Pennsylvania; 1989 Dec;49(04). Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4161868&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0022050700009451
34.
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. London: Harvard University Press; 1971.
35.
Ostrom E. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science. 1999;2(1):493–535.
36.
Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert, Nanetti, Raffaella. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy [Internet]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1993. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400820740
37.
Lucian W. Pye. Political Culture Revisited. Political Psychology [Internet]. International Society of Political Psychology; 1991;12(3):487–508. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3791758
38.
George Rabinowitz and Stuart Elaine Macdonald. A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. The American Political Science Review. American Political Science Association; 1989;Vol. 83(1):93–121.
39.
William H. Riker and Peter C. Ordeshook. A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. The American Political Science Review. American Political Science Association; 1968;62(1):25–42.
40.
Shepsle KA. Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models. American Journal of Political Science. Midwest Political Science Association; 1979 Feb;23(1):27–59.
41.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
42.
Herbst JI. States and power in Africa: comparative lessons in authority and control. Chichester: Princeton University Press; 2000.
43.
Bates RH. When things fell apart: state failure in late-century Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
44.
Evans P. The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization. World Politics [Internet]. 1997 Oct;50(1):62–87. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054027
45.
Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Skocpol, Theda. Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
46.
Haggard, Stephan, Kaufman, Robert R. The Politics of economic adjustment: international constraints, distributive conflicts, and the state. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1992.
47.
Robert H. Jackson and Carl G. Rosberg. Why Africa’s Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood. World Politics. Cambridge University Press; 1982;35(1):1–24.
48.
Melleuish G. The State in World History: Perspectives and Problems. Australian Journal of Politics and History. 2002;48(3):322–335.
49.
Slaughter AM. The Real New World Order. Foreign Affairs. 1997;76(5).
50.
Tilly, Charles. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Revised pbk. ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell; 1992.
51.
Vu T. Studying the State through State Formation. World Politics [Internet]. 2010;62(1). Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=6866180&fulltextType=RV&fileId=S0043887109990244
52.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
53.
Schmitter PC, Karl TL. What Democracy Is. . . and Is Not. Journal of Democracy. 1991;2(3):75–88.
54.
Collier D, Adcock R. Democracy and dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts. Annual Review of Political Science. 1999 Jun;2(1):537–565.
55.
Boix C. Democracy, Development, and the International System. American Political Science Review. 2011;105(04):809–828.
56.
Cheibub JA, Gandhi J, Vreeland JR. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice. 2009;143(1–2):67–101.
57.
Dahl, Robert Alan. Polyarchy: participation and opposition. London: Yale University Press; 1971.
58.
Diamond LJ. Three Paradoxes of Democracy. Journal of Democracy. 1990;1(3):48–60.
59.
Diamond LJ, Morlino L. The Quality of Democracy:  An Overview. Journal of Democracy. 2004;15(4):20–31.
60.
Munck G, Verkuilen J. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies. 2002;35(1):5–34.
61.
Olson M. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. American Political Science Association; 1993 Sep;87(3):567–576. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938736
62.
Pemstein D, Meserve S, Melton J. Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type. Political Analysis. 2010;18(4):426–449.
63.
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. 5th ed. London: Allen and Unwin; 1976.
64.
Barry R. Weingast. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. American Political Science Association; 1997;91(2):245–263. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2952354
65.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
66.
Samuel P. Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs [Internet]. Council on Foreign Relations; 1993;72(3):22–49. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20045621
67.
Acemoglu, Daron, Robinson, James A. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
68.
Boix C, Stokes SC. Endogenous Democratization. World Politics. 2003;55(04):517–549.
69.
Diamond LJ. Three Paradoxes of Democracy. Journal of Democracy. 1990;1(3):48–60.
70.
Linz, Juan J., Stepan, Alfred C. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.
71.
Lipset SM. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review. 1959;53(01):69–105.
72.
O’Donnell, Guillermo A., Schmitter, Philippe C., Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Transitions from authoritarian rule: tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1986.
73.
Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the market: political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
74.
Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and development: political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
75.
Rustow DA. Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics. 1970 Apr;2(3).
76.
Svolik M. Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation. American Political Science Review. 2008;102(2).
77.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
78.
Cheibub JA. Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
79.
Druckman JN, Roberts A. Context and Coalition-Bargaining: Comparing Portfolio Allocation in Eastern and Western Europe. Party Politics. 2005;11(5):535–555.
80.
Duverger M. A new political system model: semi-presidential government. European Journal of Political Research [Internet]. 1980 Jun;8(2):165–187. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00569.x/abstract
81.
Laver, Michael, Schofield, Norman. Multiparty government: the politics of coalition in Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1998.
82.
Lijphart A. Power-sharing versus Majority Rule: Patterns of Cabinet Formation in Twenty Democracies. Government and Opposition. 1981;16(4):395–413.
83.
Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. London: Yale University Press; 1999.
84.
Linz, Juan J. (Juan José). The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy. 1990;1(1):51–69.
85.
Sartori G. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. 2nd ed. Washington Square, N.Y.: New York University Press; 1997.
86.
Siaroff A. Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction. European Journal of Political Research [Internet]. 2003;42(3):287–312. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.00084/abstract
87.
Strom K. Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies. 1984;17(2):199–227.
88.
Paul V. Warwick and James N. Druckman. Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments. British Journal of Political Science [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2001;31(4):627–649. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593295
89.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
90.
Immergut EM. The Swedish Constitution and Social Democratic Power: Measuring the Mechanical Effect of a Political Institution. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2002 Sep;25(3):231–257.
91.
Cox, Gary W. Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
92.
Horowitz DL. Electoral Systems: A Primer for Decision Makers. Journal of Democracy [Internet]. 2003;14(4):115–127. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/195554884/C10D89C4FD5548A1PQ/11?accountid=14511
93.
Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. London: Yale University Press; 1999.
94.
Norris, Pippa. Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
95.
Reynolds A, Reilly B, Ellis A, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Electoral system design: the new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance; 2005.
96.
William H. Riker. The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law. Comparative Politics. Ph.D. Program in Political Science of the City University of New York; 1976;9(1):93–106.
97.
Sartori G. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. 2nd ed. Washington Square, N.Y.: New York University Press; 1997.
98.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
99.
North DC, Weingast BR. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History [Internet]. Economic History Association at the University of Pennsylvania; 1989 Dec;49(04). Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4161868&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0022050700009451
100.
Clarke G, Beck T, Keefer P, Groff A, Walsh P, Bank W. New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions [Internet]. World Bank Publications; 1999. Available from: http://www.worldbank.icebox.ingenta.com/content/wb/wps4301/1999/00000001/00000001/art02283
101.
Gehlbach S, Malesky EJ. The Contribution of Veto Players to Economic Reform. The Journal of Politics. 2010;72(04):957–975.
102.
Hallerberg M, Basinger S. Internationalization and Changes in Tax Policy in OECD Countries: The Importance of Domestic Veto Players. Comparative Political Studies. 1998;31(3):321–352.
103.
Henisz WJ. Politics and international investment: measuring risks and protecting profits. Cheltenham, UK: E. Elgar; 2002.
104.
KEEFER P, STASAVAGE D. The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy. American Political Science Review. 2003;97(03).
105.
Stasavage D. Private Investment and Political Institutions. Economics and Politics. 2002;14(1):41–63.
106.
Tsebelis G. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 1995 Jul;25(03). Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=3279628&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0007123400007225
107.
Tsebelis G. Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. American Political Science Association; 1999 Sep;93(3). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2585576
108.
Tsebelis G, Russell Sage Foundation. Veto players: how political institutions work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2002.
109.
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona Nadenichek. Principles of comparative politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
110.
Gandhi J, Przeworski A. Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. Comparative Political Studies. 2007;40(11):1279–1301.
111.
Malesky E, Schuler P. The Single-Party Dictator’s Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2011;36(4):491–530.
112.
Brooker, Paul. Non-democratic regimes. Revised and updated 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
113.
Brzezinski Z. Totalitarianism and Rationality. The American Political Science Review. 1956;50(3).
114.
Gandhi, Jennifer. Political institutions under dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
115.
Geddes B. What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science. 1999;2(1):115–144.
116.
Lai B, Slater D. Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950-1992. American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50(1):113–126.
117.
Levitsky S, Way L. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy. 2002;13(2):51–65.
118.
Malesky E, Schuler P. Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review. 2010;104(3):482–502.
119.
Schedler, Andreas. Electoral authoritarianism: the dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2006.
120.
Milan W. Svolik. The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
121.
Wintrobe, Ronald. The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
122.
Wright J. Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science. 2008;52(2):322–343.