Abraham, T. (1991). Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist, 54(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227
Abrams, S., Cruse, P., & Kunze, J. (2009). Preservation Is Not a Place. International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v4i1.72
Acker, A. (2015). How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture. Archival Science, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x
Adami, T. A., & Hunt, M. (2005). Genocidal Archives: The African Context—Genocide in Rwanda. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 26(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810500047557
Alexander, P., & Samuels, H. (1987). The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist, 50(4), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u
Altman, B., & Nemmers, J. (2001). The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist, 64(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74
Amelia Acker. (2014). Death, Memorialization, and Social Media: A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives. Archivaria, 77, 1–23. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13469
An argument for Archiving Facebook as a Heterogeneous Personal Store. (n.d.). http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/~marshall/DL14-marshall-and-shipman.pdf
Anderson, S., & Allen, R. (2009). Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist, 72(2), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416
Anna Chen. (2014). Disorder: Vocabularies of Hoarding in Personal Digital Archiving Practices. Archivaria, 78, 115–134. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13507
Anne, G. (n.d.). The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html
Archival Descriptions through the Looking Glass: Paratexts in Wonderland | The American Archivist. (n.d.). http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.137
Arias, P. B. (2008). Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal, 18(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810916456
Atherton, Jay. (1985). From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria, 21.
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network. (n.d.).
Bailey, C. (n.d.). Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13432/14742
Bailey, S., & Vidyarthi, J. (2010). Human-computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle? Records Management Journal, 20(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095300
Bak, G. (2016). Trusted by whom? TDRs, standards culture and the nature of trust. Archival Science, 16(4), 373–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9257-1
Baker, S., & Huber, A. (2013). Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(5), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413491721
Barbara Reed. (n.d.-a). Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the potential of pluralised recordkeeping.
Bastian, J. (2001). A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist, 64(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377
Bastian, J. (2002). Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria, 53.
Bastian, Jeannette Allis & Alexander, Ben. (2009a). Community archives: the shaping of memory: Vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047
Bastian, Jeannette Allis & Alexander, Ben. (2009b). Community archives: the shaping of memory: Vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047
Bazerman, C. (2012). The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science, 12(4), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1
Bearman, D. (2006), "Moments of risk: identifying threats to electronic records”, Archivaria, Vol. 62, pp. 15-42. Archivaria 62 (Fall 2006). (n.d.). http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/issue/view/432
Benedict, Karen M. & Society of American Archivists. (2003). Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Society of American Archivists.
Birkinshaw, P. (2005a). Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation (3rd ed). Tottel.
Birkinshaw, P. (2005b). Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation (3rd ed). Tottel.
Birkinshaw, P. (2010a). Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal: Vol. The law in context series (4th ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
Birkinshaw, P. (2010b). Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal: Vol. The law in context series (4th ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
Birkinshaw, P. (2010c). Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006
Blais, G. (1995). Access to Archival Records: A Review of Current Issues: A RAMP Study. UNESCO.
Boles, F., & Young, J. (1985). Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist, 48(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw
Boles, Frank. (2005). Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts: Vol. Archival fundamentals series. Society of American Archivists.
Booms, H. (1987). Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources.
Broady-Preston, J. (2010). The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management, 31(1/2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121011013412
Brothman, B. (1991). Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice.
Brothman, B. (1999). Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria, 48. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12717/13894
BS ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation. Records management. Concepts and principles. (2016). BSI. https://bsol.bsigroup.com/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030298891
Buchanan, A., & Bastian, M. (2015). Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects. Archival Science, 15(4), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3
Bunn, J. (2013a). Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2
Bunn, J. (2013b). Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records, 34(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830066
Butler, B. (2009). ‘Othering’ the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory. Archival Science, 9(1–2), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0
Caron, D. J., & Kellerhals, A. (n.d.). Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.
Caron, D. J., & Kellerhals, A. (2013). Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science, 13(2–3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y
Carvalho, C. (2001). Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal, 11(3), 175–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007274
Caswell, M. (2013). Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist, 76(2). http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.76.2.89324135v02r2q74
Caswell, M. (2014a). Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0
Caswell, M. (2014b). Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
Caswell, M. (2014c). Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
Caswell, M., & Mallick, S. (2014). Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts, 42(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.880931
Caswell, ML. (2016). Seeing Yourself in History: Community Archives in the Fight Against Symbolic Annihilation. The Public Historian: A Journal of Public History. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gc14537#page-1
Catherine Hobbs. (2001). The Character of Personal Archives: Reflections on the Value of Records of Individuals. Archivaria, 52. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12817/14028
Ceeney, N. (2008). The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 29(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499868
Chapman, A. (2004). Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 25(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271475
Christen, K. (2011a). Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist, 74(1), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
Christen, K. (2011b). Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist, 74(1), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
Cifor, M. (2015). Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5
Cifor, M., & Gilliland, A. J. (2015). Affect and the archive, archives and their affects: an introduction to the special issue. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9263-3
Cifor, Marika, C., Michelle. (2016). ‘To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing’: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives. American Archivist, 79(1). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0nd5g0p7
Cline, S. (2009). ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist, 72(2), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14
Cline, S. (2012). "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.2.03193j1517858r34
Clough, P., Tang, J., Hall, M. M., & Warner, A. (2011). Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings, 63(2/3), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111135628
Cole, J., Nolan, J., Seko, Y., Mancuso, K., & Ospina, A. (2011). GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811398032
Cook, M. (2006). Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691205
Cook, M. (2010). Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal, 20(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039843
Cook, T. (n.d.). Fashionable Nonsense of Professional Rebirth:Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives.
Cook, T. (2001a). Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria, 51. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12792/13989
Cook, T. (2001b). Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science, 1(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435636
Cook, T. (2006). Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science, 5(2–4), 101–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2
Cook, T. (2007). Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies.
Cook, T. (2011). ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 32(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
Cook, T. (2013). Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science, 13(2–3), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
Cook, T., & Schwartz, J. M. (2002). Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science, 2(3–4), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435620
Cook, Terry. (1993). The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria, 35.
Cook, Terry. (1997). What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria, 43, 17–63.
Cook, Terry & Samuels, Helen Willa. (2011). Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Society of American Archivists.
Cooper, D. (2015). House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8
Council of Europe. (2003). Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum. Directorate General of Human Rights, Council of Europe.
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205). (2009).
Cox, R. (n.d.). The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.
Cox, R., & Samuels, H. (1988). The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist, 51(1–2), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8
Cox, Richard J. (2004). No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Scarecrow Press.
Cox, Richard J. (2006a). Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world: Vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet.
Cox, Richard J. (2006b). Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world: Vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet.
Craig, Barbara Lazenby. (2004). Archival appraisal: theory and practice. K.G. Saur.
Craven, Louise. (2008). What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Ashgate. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315547497
Creighton Barrett. (2013). Respect Which Fonds? Personal Archives and Family Businesses in Nova Scotia. Archivaria, 76, 75–92. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13459
Crymble, A. (n.d.). An Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Use by the Archival Community. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13298/14609
Cumming, K. (2010). Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal, 20(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036224
Cumming, K., & Findlay, C. (2010). Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal, 20(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095292
Cumming, K., & Picot, A. (2014). Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts, 42(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926824
Cunningham, A. (2008). Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist, 71(2), 530–543. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507
Currall, J., & Moss, M. (2008). We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal, 18(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810858532
Cynthia K. Sauer. (2001). Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist, 64(2), 308–349. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40294175?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Doing&searchText=the&searchText=best&searchText=we&searchText=can?&searchText=The&searchText=use&searchText=of&searchText=collection&searchText=development&searchText=policies&searchText=and&searchText=cooperative&searchText=collecting&searchText=activities&searchText=at&searchText=manuscript&searchText=repositories&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DDoing%2Bthe%2Bbest%2Bwe%2Bcan%253F%2BThe%2Buse%2Bof%2Bcollection%2Bdevelopment%2Bpolicies%2Band%2Bcooperative%2Bcollecting%2Bactivities%2Bat%2Bmanuscript%2Brepositories%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000557%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
Daines, J. G., & Nimer, C. L. (2011). Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization, 9(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2011.574019
Daniel, D. (2013). Archival representations of immigration and ethnicity in North American history: from the ethnicization of archives to the archivization of ethnicity. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9209-6
Daniels, M., & Yakel, E. (2010). Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist, 73(2), 535–568. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357
Danielson, Elena S. (2010). The ethical archivist. Society of American Archivists.
Derrida, Jacques & Prenowitz, Eric. (1996). Archive fever: a Freudian impression: Vol. Religion and postmodernism. University of Chicago Press.
Describing Archives A Content Standard. (n.d.). http://files.archivists.org/pubs/DACS2E-2013_v0315.pdf
Dever, M. (2014). Photographs and manuscripts: working in the archive. Archives and Manuscripts, 42(3), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.956322
Dingwall, G. (2004). Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist, 67(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4
Dirks, J. (2004). Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria, 57. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/viewFile/12451/13554
Dominy, G. (2005). ‘We must remember our past so that we do not repeat it’ Archiving and Accessing the Records of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Duchein, M. (1992). The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist, 55(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888
Duff, W., & Johnson, C. (2003). Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist, 66(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n
Duff, W. M., Flinn, A., Suurtamm, K. E., & Wallace, D. A. (2013). Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
Duff, W. M., & Harris, V. (2002). Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science, 2(3–4), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435625
Duranti, L. (n.d.-a). Archives as place. Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. http://archivo.cartagena.es/files/36-165-DOC_FICHERO1/07-duranti_archives.pdf
Duranti, L. (n.d.-b). From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548
Duranti, L. (n.d.-c). Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.
Duranti, L. (1989a). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1.
Duranti, L. (1989b). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2.
Duranti, L. (1990a). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3.
Duranti, L. (1990b). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4.
Duranti, L. (1991). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5.
Duranti, L. (1992). Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria, 35. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92f1/d3b23cfc46f8c4ed7638ca58fac9c05c4574.pdf
Duranti, L. (2010). Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal, 20(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039852
Duranti, L., & MacNeil, H. (n.d.). The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.
Duranti, Luciana. (1998). Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Scarecrow Press.
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, & Associazione nazionale archivistica italiana. (2008). International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. CLEUP.
Duranti, Luciana, & Thibodeau, Kenneth. (2006). The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science, 6(1), 13–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7
Eastwood, T. (n.d.-a). Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.
Eastwood, T. (n.d.-b). What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?
Eastwood, T. (1993). Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies.
Eastwood, T., & MacNeil, H. (2010). Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited.
EICHHORN, K. (2010). D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies, 39(6), 622–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2010.490716
Eito-Brun, R. (2014). Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3
Elizabeth, G., & Rebecca, S. (n.d.). ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258200542_Golden_Age_Quiescence_and_Revival
Elke Zobl. (2009). Cultural Production, Transnational Networking, and Critical Reflection in Feminist Zines. Signs, 35(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1086/599256
Evans, J., McKemmish, S., Daniels, E., & McCarthy, G. (2015). Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Archival Science, 15(4), 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6
Eveleigh, A. (2012a). Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives. http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
Eveleigh, A. (2012b). Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012. http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com. (n.d.). http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th
Fear, K. (2010). User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist, 73(1), 26–60. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551
Fear, K., & Donaldson, D. R. (2012). Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science, 12(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7
Findlay, C. (2013a). People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts, 41(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
Findlay, C. (2013b). People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts, 41(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
Findlay, C. (2016). Archival activism. Archives and Manuscripts, 44(3), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2016.1263964
Flanagan, M., & Carini, P. (2012). How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist, 75(2), 514–537. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4
Flinn, A. (2007a). Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936
Flinn, A. (2007b). Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936
Flinn, A. (2010). Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509347707
Flinn, A. (2011a). Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 7(2).
Flinn, A. (2011b). Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader (pp. 145–169). Facet. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f8a3983f-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Flinn, A. (2011a). The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. Facet. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14509809360004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
Flinn, A., & Alexander, B. (2015). "Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving. Archival Science, 15(4), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6
Flinn, A., & Pick, G. (2009a). Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. In Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report. Greater London Authority. http://www.mla.gov.uk/what/programmes/renaissance/regions/london/News_and_Resources/~/media/London/Files/2009/Publications/Embedding%20Shared%20Heritage_LOW%20resolution.ashx
Flinn, A., & Stevens, M. (2009b). "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. In Community archives: the shaping of memory: Vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047
Flinn, A., Stevens, M., & Shepherd, E. (2009). Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science, 9(1–2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2
Flinn, Andrew. (2011b). Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions. Interactions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 7(2). http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9pt2490x
FORTIER, N. (2005). Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science, 5(2–4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z
Frank Upward. (1996a). Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology).
Frank Upward. (1996b). Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology).
Fryer, C. (2015). Project to Production: Digital Preservation at the Houses of Parliament, 2010–2020. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.378
Gale, C. (2006). Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691221
Gartner, R. (2015). An XML schema for enhancing the semantic interoperability of archival description. Archival Science, 15(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9225-1
Gauld, C. (2015). Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4
Geoffrey Yeo. (n.d.-b). The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13384/14691
Gilliland, A. (2011). Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science, 11(3–4), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0
Gilliland, A., & Flinn, A. (n.d.). Community Archives: What are we really talking about? Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives Meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/920626/gilliland_flinn_keynote.pdf
Gilliland, A. J. (2014a). Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
Gilliland, A. J. (2014b). Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
Gilliland, A. J., & Caswell, M. (2015). Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z
Gilliland, A. J., & Halilovich, H. (2017). Migrating memories: transdisciplinary pedagogical approaches to teaching about diasporic memory, identity and human rights in archival studies. Archival Science, 17(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9265-9
Gilliland, Anne J. (n.d.). The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice, 24. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/346521tf
Gracy, K. F. (2015). Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science, 15(3), 239–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2
Gray, V. (2008). ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499652
Green, L. J. F. (2007). Cultural heritage, archives & citizenship: 1. Critical Arts, 21(2), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560040701810073
Greene, M. (2013). A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist, 76(2), 302–334. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.14744l214663kw43
Groth, P., Gil, Y., Cheney, J., & Miles, S. (2012). Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213
Guide to archival software. (n.d.).
Halilovich, H. (2014). Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z
Ham, G. (1981). Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist, 44–3.
Hamilton, Carolyn. (2002). Refiguring the archive. Kluwer Academic.
Harris, V. (1997). Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria, 44. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12200/13217
Harris, V. (2002). The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science, 2(1–2), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435631
Harris, V. (2014). Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5
Harvey, R., & Thompson, D. (2010). Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech, 28(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011047703
Hawkins, D. T. (2013). Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Information Today, Inc.
Heather, M. (2000). Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record.
Henttonen, P. (2017). Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science, 17(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-017-9277-0
Higgins, S. (2011). Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191
Hill, A. (2004). Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 25(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271466
Hill, Jennie. (2011). The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. Facet.
Hohmann, P. (2016). On Impartiality and Interrelatedness: Reactions to Jenkinsonian Appraisal in the Twentieth Century. The American Archivist, 79(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.14
Holmlund, Mona & Avery, Cheryl. (2010). Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. University of Toronto Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442689879
Honer, E., & Graham, S. (n.d.). Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.
Hopkins, I. (2008a). Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 29(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802515069
Hopkins, I. (2008b). Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 29(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802515069
Horsman, P. (n.d.). The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.
Hurley, C. (2002). Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 30(2).
Hurley, C. (2006). Archivists and Accountability. 34(2).
Huvila, I. (2008). Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science, 8(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
Iacovino, L. (2010a). Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science, 10(4), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
Iacovino, L. (2010b). Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science, 10(4), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. (2016a). Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories (F. Foscarini, H. MacNeil, B. Mak, & G. Oliver, Eds.). Facet Publishing. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. (2016b). Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories (F. Foscarini, H. MacNeil, B. Mak, & G. Oliver, Eds.). Facet Publishing. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. (2016c). Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories (F. Foscarini, H. MacNeil, B. Mak, & G. Oliver, Eds.). Facet Publishing. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
International Council on Archives. (1992). Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description. Archivaria, 1(34). http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11837/12789
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis. (n.d.).
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework. (n.d.).
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio. (n.d.).
Ismail, A., & Jamaludin, A. (2011). Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal, 21(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125116
Isto Huvila. (n.d.-c). The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature. http://www.istohuvila.se/files/IstoHuvilaUnbearableLightnessPreprint.pdf
Jacobsen, T., Punzalan, R. L., & Hedstrom, M. L. (2013). Invoking "collective memory”: mapping the emergence of a concept in archival science. Archival Science, 13(2–3), 217–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9199-4
Jenkinson, H. (1965). A manual of archive administration (2nd ed. reprinted). Lund, Humphries.
Jenkinson, Hilary. (1948). The English archivist: a new profession. H.K. Lewis.
Jenkinson, Hilary & Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (1922). Manual of archive administration. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
Jennifer, M. (n.d.). Towards an Archival Concept of Evidence.
Jennifer Meehan. (2010). Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records. Archivaria, 70, 27–44. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13294
Jimerson, R. (2013). Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist, 76(2), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21
Jimerson, R. C. (2006). Ethical Concerns for Archivists. The Public Historian, 28(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2006.28.1.87
Jimerson, R. C. (2011). Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 39(1).
Jimerson, Randall C. & Society of American Archivists. (2009). Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Society of American Archivists.
Jonker, A. E. M. (2009). No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 30(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903264625
Joseph, P., Debowski, S., & Goldschmidt, P. (2012). Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities: implications for ISO 15489’s implementation. Records Management Journal, 22(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211222108
Kahle, B. (2007). Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist, 70(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845
Kalfatovic, M. R., Kapsalis, E., Spiess, K. P., Camp, A., & Edson, M. (2008). Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science, 8(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y
Kallberg, M. (2012). Archivists 2.0: redefining the archivist’s profession in the digital age. Records Management Journal, 22(2), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211268162
Kärberg, T. (2015). Digital preservation of knowledge in the public sector: a pre-ingest tool. Archival Science, 15(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9211-z
Ketelaar, E. (n.d.). Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.
Ketelaar, E. (2008). Archives as Spaces of Memory. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 29(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499678
Ketelaar, E. (2012). Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science, 12(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5
Kim, Y., & Ross, S. (2013). Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001042
Kirk, D., & Sellen, A. (n.d.). On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/on-human-remains-value-and-practice-in-the-home-archiving-of-cherished-objects/
Krebs, A. B. (2012). Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science, 12(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2
Kretzschmar, R. (2006). Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science, 5(2–4), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y
Lager Vestberg, N. (2008). Archival Value. Photographies, 1(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540760701786725
Lappin, J. (2010). What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal, 20(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095283
Lau, A. J., Gilliland, A. J., & Anderson, K. (2012). NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society, 15(7), 991–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404
Lee, C., & Tibbo, H. (n.d.). Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives. (n.d.). http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/
Leighton John, J. (2010). Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1. British Library.
Lemieux, V. L. (2010). The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal, 20(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011064331
Longmore, B. (2013). The Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011: creating a culture that values public records. Archives and Records, 34(2), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830067
Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud. (n.d.). http://willodom.com/publications/paper1202-odom.pdf
MacNeil, H. (n.d.-a). Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.
MacNeil, H. (n.d.-b). Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.
MacNeil, H. (n.d.-c). Trusting Records in a Postmodern World.
MacNeil, H. (2001). Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria, 51. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12793/13991
MacNeil, H. (2011). Trust and professional identity: narratives, counter-narratives and lingering ambiguities. Archival Science, 11(3–4), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9150-5
MacNeil, H. (2012). What finding aids do: archival description as rhetorical genre in traditional and web-based environments. Archival Science, 12(4), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9175-4
MacNeil, H., & Eastwood, T. (Eds.). (2017a). Currents of archival thinking (Second edition). Libraries Unlimited. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
MacNeil, H., & Eastwood, T. (Eds.). (2017b). Currents of archival thinking (Second edition). Libraries Unlimited. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
MacNeil, H., & Eastwood, T. (Eds.). (2017c). Currents of archival thinking (Second edition). Libraries Unlimited. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
MacNeil, H., & Eastwood, T. (Eds.). (2017d). Currents of archival thinking (Second edition). Libraries Unlimited. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
MacNeil, H., & Eastwood, T. (Eds.). (2017e). Currents of archival thinking (Second edition). Libraries Unlimited. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
MacNeil, H., & Eastwood, T. (Eds.). (2017f). Currents of archival thinking (Second edition). Libraries Unlimited. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
MacNeil, Heather. (1992). Without consent: the ethics of disclosing personal information in public archives. Scarecrow Press.
MacNeil, Heather & Eastwood, Terry. (2010a). Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Libraries Unlimited.
MacNeil, Heather & Eastwood, Terry. (2010b). Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Libraries Unlimited.
Mak, B. (n.d.). On the Uses of Authenticity. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13381/14688
Mancuso, L. (2013). Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts, 41(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.801101
Marsden, C. (2001). Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 22(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810120037469
Marty, P. F. (2010). An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly, 80(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1086/648549
Marty, Paul F. (2008). An introduction to digital convergence: libraries, archives, and museums in the information age. Archival Science, 8(4), 247–250. http://search.proquest.com/docview/214894353?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
Matthews, R. J. (2015). Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2
McKemmish, S. (n.d.). Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).
McKemmish, S., Faulkhead, S., & Russell, L. (2011). Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science, 11(3–4), 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2
McKemmish, S., Gililand, A. J., & Lau, A. (Eds.). (2017a). Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing. http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=628143
McKemmish, S., Gililand, A. J., & Lau, A. (Eds.). (2017b). Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing.
McKemmish, S., & Piggott, M. (2013). Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria, 76. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13461/14781
McKemmish, Sue & Charles Sturt University. (2005a). Archives: recordkeeping in society: Vol. Topics in Australasian library and information studies. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
McKemmish, Sue & Charles Sturt University. (2005b). Archives: recordkeeping in society: Vol. Topics in Australasian library and information studies. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, & Australia. (1994). The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years: Vol. Monash occasional papers in librarianship, recordkeeping and bibliography. Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives.
McLeod, J. (2012). Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal, 22(2), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211268711
McLeod, J., & Hare, C. (2010). Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal, 20(1), 9–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036215
Meijer, A. (n.d.). Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
Menne-Haritz, A. (2001). Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science, 1(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435639
Menne-Haritz, Angelika. (2004). Business processes: an archival science approach to collaborative decision making, records, and knowledge management: Vol. Archivist’s library. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Metadata Object Description Schema: MODS (Library of Congress). (n.d.). http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/
Michele V. Cloonan. (2011). The Boundaries of Preservation and Conservation Research. Libraries & the Cultural Record, 46(2), 220–229. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23053599?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Millar, L. (n.d.). The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.
Millar, Laura. (n.d.). Explaining Ourselves: 40 Years of Archivaria. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13542
Moore, S., & Pell, S. (2010). Autonomous archives. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(4–5), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527251003775513
Mortensen, P. (1999). The Place of Theory in Archival Practice.
Moss, M. (2005). The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See. The English Historical Review, 120(487), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei121
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., & Vereniging van Archivarissen in Nederland. (2003). Manual for the arrangement and description of archives: Vol. Archival classics series. Society of American Archivists.
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4. (n.d.). https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4
Neazor, M. (2007). Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13146/14390
Nesmith, T. (1999). Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory.
Newman, J. (2012). Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 33(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2012.666404
Niu, J. (2014). Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4
Niu, J. (2016). Organisation and description of datasets. Archives and Manuscripts, 44(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2016.1179585
O’Meara, E., & Tuomala, M. (n.d.). Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13385/14693
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. (n.d.). https://doi.org/[object Object]
Ormond-Parker, L., & Sloggett, R. (2012). Local archives and community collecting in the digital age. Archival Science, 12(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9154-1
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers. (n.d.).
Pearce-Moses, R. (2007). Janus in Cyberspace: Archives on the Threshold of the Digital Era. The American Archivist, 70(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.1.n7121165223j6t83
Pollard, R. (n.d.). The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review.
Procter, M. (2010). What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 31(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379811003658476
Procter, Margaret, Cook, Michael, & Williams, Caroline. (2005). Political pressure and the archival record. Society of American Archivists.
Procter, Margaret, Lewis, C. P., & Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies. (2000). New directions in archival research. Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies.
Prom, C. (2011). Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist, 74(1), 158–184. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials. (n.d.).
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society. (n.d.).
Ramírez, M. (2009). The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3. http://escholarship.org/uc/gseis_interactions?volume=5;issue=1
Ray, J. (2009). Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314720
Redwine, G. (n.d.). Personal Digital Archiving. http://www.dpconline.org/advice/technology-watch-reports
Reed, B. (2014). Reinventing access. Archives and Manuscripts, 42(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926823
Rekrut, A. (2014). Matters of substance: materiality and meaning in historical records and their digital images. Archives and Manuscripts, 42(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.958865
Rethinking the Web as a Personal Archive. (n.d.). Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/rethinking-the-web-as-a-personal-archive/
Ricardo, P., & Michelle, C. (n.d.). Critical Directions for Archival Approaches to Social Justice. The Library Quarterly. http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/684145
Ridener, John. (2009). From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Litwin Books.
Riley, J., & Shepherd, K. (2009). A Brave New World: Archivists and Shareable Descriptive Metadata - American Archivist - Volume 72, Number 1 / Spring/Summer 2009 - Society of American Archivists.
Riley, T. (2009). Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs. http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf
Riva A. Pollard. (2001). The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review. Archivaria, 52. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12818/14030
Roberts, J. (n.d.-a). Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.
Roberts, J. (n.d.-b). What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.
Robinson, G. (2014). Break the rules, save the records: human rights archives and the search for justice in East Timor. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9228-y
Robinson, H. (2012). Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship, 27(4), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
Rolan, G. (2015). Towards Archive 2.0: issues in archival systems interoperability. Archives and Manuscripts, 43(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.959535
Roy, L., Trace, C., & Gilbert, S. (2013). Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals. IFLA World Library and Information Congress, 17 - 23 August 2013, Singapore. http://library.ifla.org/108/
Ruddock, B. (2011). Linked Data and the LOCAH project. Business Information Review, 28(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382111404013
Sachs, A. (2006). Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria, 62. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12887/14118
Sachs, H. R. (2008). Reconstructing a Life: The Archival Challenges of Women’s History. Library Trends, 56(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2008.0018
Samuels, H. (1991). Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria, 33.
‘Say nothing’: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas. (n.d.). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.859573
Scanlan, K. (2011). ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction. The American Archivist, 74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23079045?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Schellenberg, T. R. (n.d.). The Appraisal of Modern Records.
Schellenberg, T. R. (1956a). Modern archives: principles and techniques. F.W. Cheshire. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
Schellenberg, T. R. (1956b). Modern archives: principles and techniques. F.W. Cheshire.
Schwartz, J. M., & Cook, T. (2002a). Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science, 2(1–2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628
Schwartz, J. M., & Cook, T. (2002b). Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science, 2(1–2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628
SCOTT, M. (1997). Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal, 7(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb027107
Sellie, A., Goldstein, J., Fair, M., & Hoyer, J. (2015). Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture. Archival Science, 15(4), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5
Sexton, A., Turner, C., Yeo, G., & Hockey, S. (2004). Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 25(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000199133
Shepherd, E. (2007). Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701607736
Shepherd, E. (2009). Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Ashgate. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780754681922
Shepherd, E. (2015). Freedom of Information, Right to Access Information, Open Data: Who is at the Table? The Round Table, 104(6), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101
Shepherd, E. (2017). Pioneering women archivists in England: Ethel Stokes (1870–1944), record agent. Archival Science, 17(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9272-x
Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., & Flinn, A. (2009). The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 30(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903445000
Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., & Flinn, A. (2011). Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal, 21(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111152053
Shepherd, Elizabeth. (2009). Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. In Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Ashgate. https://doi.org/https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780754681922/startPage/186
Shilton, K., & Srinivasan, R. (2007a). Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. Archivaria, 63.
Shilton, K., & Srinivasan, R. (2007b). Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections.
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf. (n.d.). https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20
Sims, F. (2002). A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal, 12(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690210427743
Sinn, D., & Syn, S. Y. (2013). Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life? Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9208-7
Smit, F. (Ed.). (2017). Archives in Liquid Times. Dutch Society for Archival Publications (S@P). http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30942
Standards for Archival Description: A Handbook. (1999). http://www.archivists.org/catalog/stds99/
Stevens, M., Flinn, A., & Shepherd, E. (2010). New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441770
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record. (1998). The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996: Vol. Skrifter utgivna av Riksarkivet. Riksarkivet.
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance & Sweden. (1994). The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993: Vol. Skrifter utgivna av Svenska riksarkivet. Swedish National Archives.
Strauss, A. (2014a). Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
Strauss, A. (2014b). Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
Strauss, A. (2015). Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science, 15(4), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
Sue, M. (1997). Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology).
Sue McKemmish. (2005). Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In Archives: recordkeeping in society: Vol. Topics in Australasian library and information studies (pp. 1–20). Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
Susan Pell. (2015). Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive: An Ethnographic Reading of an Activist Archive. Archivaria, 80, 33–57. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13543/14896
Taavetti, R. (2015). A marshall in love. Remembering and forgetting queer pasts in the Finnish archives. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9251-7
Taylor, I. (2016). The German appraisal discussion since 1990: an overview. Archives and Manuscripts, 44(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2015.1136226
The Almost Accidental Archive and its Impact on Literary Subjects and Canonicity. (2007). Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études Canadiennes, 40(2), 96–108. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_canadian_studies/v040/40.2tector.html
The American Archivist - Breaking the Language Barrier: Describing Chicano Archives with Bilingual Finding Aids. (n.d.). http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.77.2.p66l555g15g981p6
The American Archivist - Crippling the Archives: Negotiating Notions of Disability in Appraisal and Arrangement and Description. (n.d.). http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.1.c53h4712017n4728
The American Archivist - EAD Tag Usage: Community Analysis of the Use of Encoded Archival Description Elements. (n.d.). http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.76.2.x4h78gx76780q072
The American Archivist - Leveraging Encoded Archival Description for Access to Digital Content: A Cost and Usability Analysis. (n.d.). http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.1.5641v61p422u0u90
The Guide to Researching Audiences. (n.d.).
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation. (n.d.). https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html
The National Archives. (n.d.-d). The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond. (n.d.).
The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. (2009). Library Trends, 57(3), 490–515. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0049
Theimer, K. (2011). What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist, 74(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666
Thorpe, K. (2013). Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field. http://library.ifla.org/99/
Thurston, A. (2014). Integrity in government through records management: essays in honour of Anne Thurston (J. Lowry & J. Wamukoya, Eds.). Ashgate.
Timms, K. (n.d.). New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549
Tom Nesmith. (2002). Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist, 65. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.65.1.rr48450509r0712u
Tough, A. (2011). Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal, 21(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111186894
Toward More Honest Description | The American Archivist. (n.d.). http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.26
Trace, C. B. (2002). What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science, 2(1–2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435634
Tschan, R. (2002). A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist, 65(2), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1
Upward, F. (2000). Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal, 10(3), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259
Upward, Frank. (n.d.-e). Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.
Upward, Frank. (1996c). Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties.
Valge, J., & Kibal, B. (2007). Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611951
Vilar, P., & Sauperl, A. (2015). Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives. International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001
Vukliš, V. (n.d.). Archival Activism: Emerging Forms, Local Applications. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/112790sz#page-1
Wakimoto, D. K., Bruce, C., & Partridge, H. (2013). Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science, 13(4), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1
Wallace, David A. & Cox, Richard J. (2002a). Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books.
Wallace, David A. & Cox, Richard J. (2002b). Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books.
Wamukoya, J. (2000). Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal, 10(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007254
When Archivists and Digital Asset Managers Collide: Tensions and Ways Forward | The American Archivist. (n.d.). http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.121
Williams, C. (n.d.). Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.
Wilson, J. Z., & Golding, F. (2015). Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3
Wisniewski, Timothy. (2008). Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image, 7(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1353/mov.2008.0002
Wood, S., Carbone, K., Cifor, M., Gilliland, A., & Punzalan, R. (2014a). Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
Wood, S., Carbone, K., Cifor, M., Gilliland, A., & Punzalan, R. (2014b). Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science, 14(3–4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: a modern approach (5th ed). South-Western Cengage Learning.
WORTHY, B. (2010). More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance, 23(4), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x
Worthy, B., & Hazell, R. (2017). Disruptive, Dynamic and Democratic? Ten Years of FOI in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 70(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv069
Yaco, S., & Hardy, B. B. (2013). Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science, 13(2–3), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0
Yakel, E. (2003). Archival representation. Archival Science, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438926
Yakel, E., & Bost, L. L. (n.d.). Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivist. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293870
Yakel, E., & Torres, D. (2003). AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist, 66(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800
Yeo, G. (n.d.). Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13407/14713
Yeo, G. (2007). Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist, 70(2), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
Yeo, G. (2008). Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist, 71(1), 118–143. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2
Yeo, G. (2010). ‘Nothing is the same as something else’: significant properties and notions of identity and originality. Archival Science, 10(2), 85–116. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-010-9119-9
Yeo, G. (2011). Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal, 21(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125071
Zhang, J. (n.d.). Original Order in Digital Archives. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13410/14719
