[1]
Abraham, T. 1991. Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist. 54, 1 (Jan. 1991), 44–52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227.
[2]
Abrams, S. et al. 2009. Preservation Is Not a Place. International Journal of Digital Curation. 4, 1 (Jun. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v4i1.72.
[3]
Acker, A. 2015. How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture. Archival Science. 15, 1 (Mar. 2015), 1–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x.
[4]
Adami, T.A. and Hunt, M. 2005. Genocidal Archives: The African Context—Genocide in Rwanda. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 26, 1 (Apr. 2005), 105–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810500047557.
[5]
Alexander, P. and Samuels, H. 1987. The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist. 50, 4 (Oct. 1987), 518–531. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u.
[6]
Altman, B. and Nemmers, J. 2001. The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist. 64, 1 (Jan. 2001), 121–131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74.
[7]
Amelia Acker 2014. Death, Memorialization, and Social Media: A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives. Archivaria. 77, (2014), 1–23.
[8]
An Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Use by the Archival Community: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13298/14609.
[9]
Anderson, S. and Allen, R. 2009. Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist. 72, 2 (Sep. 2009), 383–400. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416.
[10]
Anna Chen 2014. Disorder: Vocabularies of Hoarding in Personal Digital Archiving Practices. Archivaria. 78, (2014), 115–134.
[11]
Archival Descriptions through the Looking Glass: Paratexts in Wonderland | The American Archivist: http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.137.
[12]
Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms: .
[13]
Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual: .
[14]
Arias, P.B. 2008. Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal. 18, 3 (2008), 205–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810916456.
[15]
Atherton, Jay 1985. From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria. 21 (1985).
[16]
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network: .
[17]
Bailey, C. Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal.
[18]
Bailey, S. and Vidyarthi, J. 2010. Human-computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle? Records Management Journal. 20, 3 (2010), 279–290. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095300.
[19]
Bak, G. 2016. Trusted by whom? TDRs, standards culture and the nature of trust. Archival Science. 16, 4 (Dec. 2016), 373–402. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9257-1.
[20]
Baker, S. and Huber, A. 2013. Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 16, 5 (Oct. 2013), 513–530. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413491721.
[21]
Barbara Reed Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the potential of pluralised recordkeeping.
[22]
Bastian, J. 2001. A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist. 64, 1 (Jan. 2001), 96–114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377.
[23]
Bastian, J. 2002. Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria. 53 (2002).
[24]
Bastian, Jeannette Allis and Alexander, Ben 2009. Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet.
[25]
Bastian, Jeannette Allis and Alexander, Ben 2009. Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet.
[26]
Bazerman, C. 2012. The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science. 12, 4 (Dec. 2012), 377–388. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1.
[27]
Bearman, D. (2006), "Moments of risk: identifying threats to electronic records”, Archivaria, Vol. 62, pp. 15-42. Archivaria 62 (Fall 2006): http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/issue/view/432.
[28]
Benedict, Karen M. and Society of American Archivists 2003. Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Society of American Archivists.
[29]
Birkinshaw, P. 2010. Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly. 27, 4 (Oct. 2010), 312–321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006.
[30]
Birkinshaw, P. 2010. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. Cambridge University Press.
[31]
Birkinshaw, P. 2010. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. Cambridge University Press.
[32]
Birkinshaw, P. 2005. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. Tottel.
[33]
Birkinshaw, P. 2005. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. Tottel.
[34]
Blais, G. 1995. Access to Archival Records: A Review of Current Issues: A RAMP Study. UNESCO.
[35]
Boles, F. and Young, J. 1985. Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist. 48, 2 (Apr. 1985), 121–140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw.
[36]
Boles, Frank 2005. Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts. Society of American Archivists.
[37]
Broady-Preston, J. 2010. The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management. 31, 1/2 (2010), 66–78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121011013412.
[38]
Brothman, B. 1999. Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria. 48, (1999).
[39]
Buchanan, A. and Bastian, M. 2015. Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects. Archival Science. 15, 4 (Dec. 2015), 429–451. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3.
[40]
Bunn, J. 2013. Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records. 34, 2 (Oct. 2013), 235–247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830066.
[41]
Bunn, J. 2013. Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science. (Mar. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2.
[42]
Butler, B. 2009. ‘Othering’ the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory. Archival Science. 9, 1–2 (Jun. 2009), 57–69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0.
[43]
Caron, D.J. and Kellerhals, A. 2013. Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science. 13, 2–3 (Jun. 2013), 207–216. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y.
[44]
Carvalho, C. 2001. Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal. 11, 3 (2001), 175–205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007274.
[45]
Caswell, M. 2014. Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 207–213. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0.
[46]
Caswell, M. 2013. Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist. 76, 2 (2013).
[47]
Caswell, M. 2014. Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 307–322. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6.
[48]
Caswell, M. 2014. Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 307–322. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6.
[49]
Caswell, M. and Mallick, S. 2014. Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 1 (Jan. 2014), 73–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.880931.
[50]
Caswell, ML 2016. Seeing Yourself in History: Community Archives in the Fight Against Symbolic Annihilation. The Public Historian: a journal of public history. (2016).
[51]
Catherine Hobbs 2001. The Character of Personal Archives: Reflections on the Value of Records of Individuals. Archivaria. 52, (2001).
[52]
Ceeney, N. 2008. The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 1 (Apr. 2008), 57–71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499868.
[53]
Chapman, A. 2004. Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, 2 (Oct. 2004), 149–155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271475.
[54]
Christen, K. 2011. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 74, 1 (Apr. 2011), 185–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521.
[55]
Christen, K. 2011. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 74, 1 (Apr. 2011), 185–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521.
[56]
Cifor, M. 2015. Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Archival Science. (Nov. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5.
[57]
Cifor, M. and Gilliland, A.J. 2015. Affect and the archive, archives and their affects: an introduction to the special issue. Archival Science. (Nov. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9263-3.
[58]
Cifor, Marika, C., Michelle 2016. ‘To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing’: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives. American Archivist. 79, 1 (2016).
[59]
Cline, S. 2012. "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist. (2012).
[60]
Cline, S. 2009. ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist. 72, 2 (Sep. 2009), 331–343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14.
[61]
Clough, P. et al. 2011. Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings. 63, 2/3 (2011), 127–147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111135628.
[62]
Cole, J. et al. 2011. GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society. 13, 7 (Nov. 2011), 1161–1179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811398032.
[63]
Cook, M. 2010. Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal. 20, 1 (2010), 72–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039843.
[64]
Cook, M. 2006. Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 27, 1 (Apr. 2006), 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691205.
[65]
Cook, T. 2001. Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science. 1, 1 (Mar. 2001), 3–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435636.
[66]
Cook, T. 2007. Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies. (2007).
[67]
Cook, T. 2013. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science. 13, 2–3 (Jun. 2013), 95–120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7.
[68]
Cook, T. Fashionable Nonsense of Professional Rebirth:Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives.
[69]
Cook, T. 2001. Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria. 51, (2001).
[70]
Cook, T. 2006. Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science. 5, 2–4 (Sep. 2006), 101–161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2.
[71]
Cook, T. 2011. ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 32, 2 (Oct. 2011), 173–189. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.619688.
[72]
Cook, T. and Schwartz, J.M. 2002. Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science. 2, 3–4 (Sep. 2002), 171–185. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435620.
[73]
Cook, Terry 1993. The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria. 35, (1993).
[74]
Cook, Terry 1997. What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria. 43 (1997), 17–63.
[75]
Cook, Terry and Samuels, Helen Willa 2011. Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Society of American Archivists.
[76]
Cooper, D. 2015. House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives. Archival Science. (Jul. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8.
[77]
Council of Europe 2003. Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum. Directorate General of Human Rights, Council of Europe.
[78]
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205): 2009. .
[79]
Cox, R. and Samuels, H. 1988. The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist. 51, 1–2 (Jan. 1988), 28–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8.
[80]
Cox, Richard J. 2006. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. Facet.
[81]
Cox, Richard J. 2006. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. Facet.
[82]
Cox, Richard J. 2004. No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Scarecrow Press.
[83]
Craig, Barbara Lazenby 2004. Archival appraisal: theory and practice. K.G. Saur.
[84]
Craven, Louise 2008. What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Ashgate.
[85]
Creighton Barrett 2013. Respect Which Fonds? Personal Archives and Family Businesses in Nova Scotia. Archivaria. 76, (2013), 75–92.
[86]
Cumming, K. 2010. Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal. 20, 1 (2010), 41–52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036224.
[87]
Cumming, K. and Findlay, C. 2010. Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal. 20, 3 (2010), 265–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095292.
[88]
Cumming, K. and Picot, A. 2014. Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 2 (May 2014), 133–145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926824.
[89]
Cunningham, A. 2008. Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist. 71, 2 (Sep. 2008), 530–543. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507.
[90]
Currall, J. and Moss, M. 2008. We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal. 18, 1 (2008), 69–91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810858532.
[91]
Cynthia K. Sauer 2001. Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist. 64, 2 (2001), 308–349.
[92]
Daines, J.G. and Nimer, C.L. 2011. Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization. 9, 1 (Jan. 2011), 4–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2011.574019.
[93]
Daniel, D. 2013. Archival representations of immigration and ethnicity in North American history: from the ethnicization of archives to the archivization of ethnicity. Archival Science. (Aug. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9209-6.
[94]
Daniels, M. and Yakel, E. 2010. Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist. 73, 2 (Sep. 2010), 535–568. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357.
[95]
Danielson, Elena S. 2010. The ethical archivist. Society of American Archivists.
[96]
Derrida, Jacques and Prenowitz, Eric 1996. Archive fever: a Freudian impression. University of Chicago Press.
[97]
Dever, M. 2014. Photographs and manuscripts: working in the archive. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 3 (Sep. 2014), 282–294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.956322.
[98]
Dingwall, G. 2004. Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist. 67, 1 (Jan. 2004), 11–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4.
[99]
Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1: 1989. .
[100]
Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2: 1989. .
[101]
Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3: 1990. .
[102]
Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4: 1990. .
[103]
Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5: 1991. .
[104]
Dirks, J. 2004. Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria. 57, (2004).
[105]
Dominy, G. 2005. ‘We must remember our past so that we do not repeat it’ Archiving and Accessing the Records of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. (2005).
[106]
Duchein, M. 1992. The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist. 55, 1 (Jan. 1992), 14–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888.
[107]
Duff, W. and Johnson, C. 2003. Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist. 66, 1 (Jan. 2003), 79–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n.
[108]
Duff, W.M. et al. 2013. Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science. 13, 4 (Jan. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x.
[109]
Duff, W.M. and Harris, V. 2002. Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science. 2, 3–4 (Sep. 2002), 263–285. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435625.
[110]
Duranti, L. Archives as place. Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Research.
[111]
Duranti, L. 2010. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal. 20, 1 (2010), 78–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039852.
[112]
Duranti, L. 1992. Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria. 35, (1992).
[113]
Duranti, Luciana 1998. Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Scarecrow Press.
[114]
Duranti, Luciana et al. 2008. International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. CLEUP.
[115]
Duranti, Luciana and Thibodeau, Kenneth 2006. The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science. 6, 1 (Oct. 2006), 13–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7.
[116]
Eastwood, T. and MacNeil, H. 2010. Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited.
[117]
EICHHORN, K. 2010. D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies. 39, 6 (Jul. 2010), 622–646. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2010.490716.
[118]
Eito-Brun, R. 2014. Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science. (Feb. 2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3.
[119]
Elizabeth, G. and Rebecca, S. ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work.
[120]
Elke Zobl 2009. Cultural Production, Transnational Networking, and Critical Reflection in Feminist Zines. Signs. 35, 1 (2009), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/599256.
[121]
Evans, J. et al. 2015. Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Archival Science. 15, 4 (Dec. 2015), 337–368. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6.
[122]
Eveleigh, A. 2012. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives. (2012).
[123]
Eveleigh, A. 2012. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012.
[124]
Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.): .
[125]
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com: http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th.
[126]
Fear, K. 2010. User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist. 73, 1 (May 2010), 26–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551.
[127]
Fear, K. and Donaldson, D.R. 2012. Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science. 12, 3 (Sep. 2012), 319–339. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7.
[128]
Findlay, C. 2016. Archival activism. Archives and Manuscripts. 44, 3 (Sep. 2016), 155–159. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2016.1263964.
[129]
Findlay, C. 2013. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts. 41, 1 (Mar. 2013), 7–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.779926.
[130]
Findlay, C. 2013. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts. 41, 1 (Mar. 2013), 7–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.779926.
[131]
Flanagan, M. and Carini, P. 2012. How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist. 75, 2 (Oct. 2012), 514–537. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4.
[132]
Flinn, A. 2011. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies. 7, 2 (2011).
[133]
Flinn, A. 2011. Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. Facet. 145–169.
[134]
Flinn, A. 2007. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 2 (Oct. 2007), 151–176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936.
[135]
Flinn, A. 2007. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 2 (Oct. 2007), 151–176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936.
[136]
Flinn, A. 2010. Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 16, 1 (Feb. 2010), 39–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509347707.
[137]
Flinn, A. 2011. The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. Facet.
[138]
Flinn, A. et al. 2009. Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science. 9, 1–2 (Oct. 2009), 71–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2.
[139]
Flinn, A. and Alexander, B. 2015. "Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving. Archival Science. 15, 4 (Dec. 2015), 329–335. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6.
[140]
Flinn, A. and Pick, G. 2009. Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report. Greater London Authority.
[141]
Flinn, A. and Stevens, M. 2009. "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet.
[142]
Flinn, Andrew 2011. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions. Interactions: UCLA journal of education and information studies. 7, 2 (2011).
[143]
FORTIER, N. 2005. Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science. 5, 2–4 (Dec. 2005), 343–360. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z.
[144]
From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548.
[145]
Fryer, C. 2015. Project to Production: Digital Preservation at the Houses of Parliament, 2010–2020. International Journal of Digital Curation. 10, 2 (Jun. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.378.
[146]
Gale, C. 2006. Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 27, 1 (Apr. 2006), 17–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691221.
[147]
Gartner, R. 2015. An XML schema for enhancing the semantic interoperability of archival description. Archival Science. 15, 3 (Sep. 2015), 295–313. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9225-1.
[148]
Gauld, C. 2015. Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist. Archival Science. (Nov. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4.
[149]
Geoffrey Yeo The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection.
[150]
Gilliland, A. 2011. Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science. 11, 3–4 (Aug. 2011), 193–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0.
[151]
Gilliland, A. and Flinn, A. Community Archives: What are we really talking about? Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,.
[152]
Gilliland, A.J. 2014. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 249–274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3.
[153]
Gilliland, A.J. 2014. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 249–274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3.
[154]
Gilliland, A.J. and Caswell, M. 2015. Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science. (Nov. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z.
[155]
Gilliland, A.J. and Halilovich, H. 2017. Migrating memories: transdisciplinary pedagogical approaches to teaching about diasporic memory, identity and human rights in archival studies. Archival Science. 17, 1 (Mar. 2017), 79–96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9265-9.
[156]
Gilliland, Anne J The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,. 24.
[157]
Gracy, K.F. 2015. Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science. 15, 3 (Sep. 2015), 239–294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2.
[158]
Gray, V. 2008. ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 1 (Apr. 2008), 1–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499652.
[159]
Green, L.J.F. 2007. Cultural heritage, archives & citizenship: 1. Critical Arts. 21, 2 (Nov. 2007), 308–320. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02560040701810073.
[160]
Greene, M. 2013. A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist. 76, 2 (Sep. 2013), 302–334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.14744l214663kw43.
[161]
Groth, P. et al. 2012. Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation. 7, 1 (Mar. 2012). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213.
[162]
Guide to archival software: .
[163]
Halilovich, H. 2014. Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 231–247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z.
[164]
Ham, G. 1981. Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist. 44–3, (1981).
[165]
Hamilton, Carolyn 2002. Refiguring the archive. Kluwer Academic.
[166]
Harris, V. 2014. Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 215–229. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5.
[167]
Harris, V. 1997. Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria. 44, (1997).
[168]
Harris, V. 2002. The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science. 2, 1–2 (Mar. 2002), 63–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435631.
[169]
Harvey, R. and Thompson, D. 2010. Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech. 28, 2 (2010), 313–322. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011047703.
[170]
Hawkins, D.T. 2013. Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Information Today, Inc.
[171]
Heather, M. 2000. Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record.
[172]
Henttonen, P. 2017. Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science. 17, 3 (Sep. 2017), 285–303. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-017-9277-0.
[173]
Higgins, S. 2011. Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation. 6, 2 (Oct. 2011). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191.
[174]
Hill, A. 2004. Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, 2 (Oct. 2004), 139–148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271466.
[175]
Hill, Jennie 2011. The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. Facet.
[176]
Hohmann, P. 2016. On Impartiality and Interrelatedness: Reactions to Jenkinsonian Appraisal in the Twentieth Century. The American Archivist. 79, 1 (Jun. 2016), 14–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.14.
[177]
Holmlund, Mona and Avery, Cheryl 2010. Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. University of Toronto Press.
[178]
Hopkins, I. 2008. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 1 (Apr. 2008), 83–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802515069.
[179]
Hopkins, I. 2008. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 1 (Apr. 2008), 83–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802515069.
[180]
Hurley, C. 2006. Archivists and Accountability. 34, 2 (2006).
[181]
Hurley, C. 2002. Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 30, 2 (2002).
[182]
Huvila, I. 2008. Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science. 8, 1 (Mar. 2008), 15–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0.
[183]
Iacovino, L. 2010. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 10, 4 (Jun. 2010), 353–372. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3.
[184]
Iacovino, L. 2010. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 10, 4 (Jun. 2010), 353–372. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3.
[185]
Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals: 2013. http://library.ifla.org/108/.
[186]
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives 2016. Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Facet Publishing.
[187]
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives 2016. Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Facet Publishing.
[188]
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives 2016. Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Facet Publishing.
[189]
International Council on Archives 1992. Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description. Archivaria. 1, 34 (1992).
[190]
Ismail, A. and Jamaludin, A. 2011. Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal. 21, 1 (2011), 69–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125116.
[191]
Isto Huvila The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature.
[192]
Jacobsen, T. et al. 2013. Invoking "collective memory”: mapping the emergence of a concept in archival science. Archival Science. 13, 2–3 (Jun. 2013), 217–251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9199-4.
[193]
Jenkinson, H. 1965. A manual of archive administration. Lund, Humphries.
[194]
Jenkinson, Hilary 1948. The English archivist: a new profession. H.K. Lewis.
[195]
Jenkinson, Hilary and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 1922. Manual of archive administration.
[196]
Jennifer Meehan 2010. Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records. Archivaria. 70, (2010), 27–44.
[197]
Jimerson, R. 2013. Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist. 76, 2 (Sep. 2013), 335–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21.
[198]
Jimerson, Randall C. and Society of American Archivists 2009. Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Society of American Archivists.
[199]
Jimerson, R.C. 2006. Ethical Concerns for Archivists. The Public Historian. 28, 1 (Feb. 2006), 87–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2006.28.1.87.
[200]
Jimerson, R.C. 2011. Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 39, 1 (2011).
[201]
Jonker, A.E.M. 2009. No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 30, 1 (Apr. 2009), 67–80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903264625.
[202]
Joseph, P. et al. 2012. Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities: implications for ISO 15489’s implementation. Records Management Journal. 22, 1 (2012), 57–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211222108.
[203]
Kahle, B. 2007. Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist. 70, 1 (Jan. 2007), 23–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845.
[204]
Kalfatovic, M.R. et al. 2008. Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science. 8, 4 (Dec. 2008), 267–277. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y.
[205]
Kallberg, M. 2012. Archivists 2.0: redefining the archivist’s profession in the digital age. Records Management Journal. 22, 2 (2012), 98–115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211268162.
[206]
Kärberg, T. 2015. Digital preservation of knowledge in the public sector: a pre-ingest tool. Archival Science. 15, 1 (Mar. 2015), 83–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9211-z.
[207]
Ketelaar, E. 2008. Archives as Spaces of Memory. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 1 (Apr. 2008), 9–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499678.
[208]
Ketelaar, E. 2012. Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science. 12, 1 (Mar. 2012), 19–33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5.
[209]
Kim, Y. and Ross, S. 2013. Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 50, 1 (2013), 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001042.
[210]
Kirk, D. and Sellen, A. On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. Microsoft Research.
[211]
Krebs, A.B. 2012. Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science. 12, 2 (Jun. 2012), 173–190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2.
[212]
Kretzschmar, R. 2006. Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science. 5, 2–4 (Jul. 2006), 219–238. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y.
[213]
Lager Vestberg, N. 2008. Archival Value. Photographies. 1, 1 (Mar. 2008), 49–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17540760701786725.
[214]
Lappin, J. 2010. What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal. 20, 3 (2010), 252–264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095283.
[215]
Lau, A.J. et al. 2012. NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 7 (Sep. 2012), 991–1015. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404.
[216]
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/.
[217]
Leighton John, J. 2010. Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1. British Library.
[218]
Lemieux, V.L. 2010. The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal. 20, 2 (2010), 199–216. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011064331.
[219]
Longmore, B. 2013. The Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011: creating a culture that values public records. Archives and Records. 34, 2 (Oct. 2013), 248–262. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830067.
[220]
MacNeil, H. 2011. Trust and professional identity: narratives, counter-narratives and lingering ambiguities. Archival Science. 11, 3–4 (Oct. 2011), 175–192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9150-5.
[221]
MacNeil, H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World.
[222]
MacNeil, H. 2001. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria. 51, (2001).
[223]
MacNeil, H. 2012. What finding aids do: archival description as rhetorical genre in traditional and web-based environments. Archival Science. 12, 4 (Dec. 2012), 485–500. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9175-4.
[224]
MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. eds. 2017. Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited.
[225]
MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. eds. 2017. Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited.
[226]
MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. eds. 2017. Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited.
[227]
MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. eds. 2017. Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited.
[228]
MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. eds. 2017. Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited.
[229]
MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. eds. 2017. Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited.
[230]
MacNeil, Heather 1992. Without consent: the ethics of disclosing personal information in public archives. Scarecrow Press.
[231]
MacNeil, Heather and Eastwood, Terry 2010. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Libraries Unlimited.
[232]
MacNeil, Heather and Eastwood, Terry 2010. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Libraries Unlimited.
[233]
Mak, B. On the Uses of Authenticity.
[234]
Mancuso, L. 2013. Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts. 41, 2 (Jul. 2013), 146–159. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.801101.
[235]
Marsden, C. 2001. Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 22, 1 (Apr. 2001), 17–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810120037469.
[236]
Marty, Paul F 2008. An introduction to digital convergence: libraries, archives, and museums in the information age. Archival Science. 8, 4 (2008), 247–250.
[237]
Marty, P.F. 2010. An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly. 80, 1 (2010), 1–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/648549.
[238]
Matthews, R.J. 2015. Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism. Archival Science. (Jun. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2.
[239]
McKemmish, S. et al. 2011. Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science. 11, 3–4 (Nov. 2011), 211–239. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2.
[240]
McKemmish, S. et al. eds. 2017. Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing.
[241]
McKemmish, S. et al. eds. 2017. Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing.
[242]
McKemmish, S. and Piggott, M. 2013. Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria. 76, (2013).
[243]
McKemmish, Sue et al. 1994. The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years. Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives.
[244]
McKemmish, Sue and Charles Sturt University 2005. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
[245]
McKemmish, Sue and Charles Sturt University 2005. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
[246]
McLeod, J. 2012. Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal. 22, 2 (2012), 92–97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211268711.
[247]
McLeod, J. and Hare, C. 2010. Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal. 20, 1 (2010), 9–40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036215.
[248]
Meijer, A. Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
[249]
Menne-Haritz, A. 2001. Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science. 1, 1 (Mar. 2001), 57–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435639.
[250]
Menne-Haritz, Angelika 2004. Business processes: an archival science approach to collaborative decision making, records, and knowledge management. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[251]
Metadata Object Description Schema: MODS (Library of Congress): http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/.
[252]
Michele V. Cloonan 2011. The Boundaries of Preservation and Conservation Research. Libraries & the Cultural Record. 46, 2 (2011), 220–229.
[253]
Millar, Laura Explaining Ourselves: 40 Years of Archivaria.
[254]
Moore, S. and Pell, S. 2010. Autonomous archives. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 16, 4–5 (Jul. 2010), 255–268. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527251003775513.
[255]
Moss, M. 2005. The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See. The English Historical Review. 120, 487 (Jun. 2005), 577–592. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei121.
[256]
Muller, Samuel et al. 2003. Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Society of American Archivists.
[257]
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4.
[258]
Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies: 1993. .
[259]
Neazor, M. 2007. Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. (2007).
[260]
New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549.
[261]
Newman, J. 2012. Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 33, 1 (Apr. 2012), 57–73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2012.666404.
[262]
Niu, J. 2014. Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science. (Jun. 2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4.
[263]
Niu, J. 2016. Organisation and description of datasets. Archives and Manuscripts. 44, 2 (May 2016), 73–85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2016.1179585.
[264]
O’Meara, E. and Tuomala, M. Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository.
[265]
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog: .
[266]
Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice: 1991. .
[267]
Ormond-Parker, L. and Sloggett, R. 2012. Local archives and community collecting in the digital age. Archival Science. 12, 2 (Jun. 2012), 191–212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9154-1.
[268]
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers: .
[269]
Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections: 2007. .
[270]
Pearce-Moses, R. 2007. Janus in Cyberspace: Archives on the Threshold of the Digital Era. The American Archivist. 70, 1 (Jan. 2007), 13–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.1.n7121165223j6t83.
[271]
Personal Digital Archiving: http://www.dpconline.org/advice/technology-watch-reports.
[272]
Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists: .
[273]
Procter, M. 2010. What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 31, 1 (Apr. 2010), 15–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379811003658476.
[274]
Procter, Margaret et al. 2000. New directions in archival research. Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies.
[275]
Procter, Margaret et al. 2005. Political pressure and the archival record. Society of American Archivists.
[276]
Prom, C. 2011. Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist. 74, 1 (Apr. 2011), 158–184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v.
[277]
Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field: 2013. http://library.ifla.org/99/.
[278]
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials: .
[279]
Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES: .
[280]
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society: .
[281]
Ramírez, M. 2009. The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3. (2009).
[282]
Ray, J. 2009. Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship. 24, 4 (Dec. 2009), 357–368. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314720.
[283]
Reed, B. 2014. Reinventing access. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 2 (May 2014), 123–132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926823.
[284]
Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies: .
[285]
Rekrut, A. 2014. Matters of substance: materiality and meaning in historical records and their digital images. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 3 (Sep. 2014), 238–247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.958865.
[286]
Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications: .
[287]
Ricardo, P. and Michelle, C. Critical Directions for Archival Approaches to Social Justice. The Library Quarterly.
[288]
Ridener, John 2009. From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Litwin Books.
[289]
Riley, J. and Shepherd, K. 2009. A Brave New World: Archivists and Shareable Descriptive Metadata - American Archivist - Volume 72, Number 1 / Spring/Summer 2009 - Society of American Archivists. (2009).
[290]
Riley, T. 2009. Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs.
[291]
Riva A. Pollard 2001. The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review. Archivaria. 52, (2001).
[292]
Robinson, G. 2014. Break the rules, save the records: human rights archives and the search for justice in East Timor. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 323–343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9228-y.
[293]
Robinson, H. 2012. Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship. 27, 4 (Oct. 2012), 413–429. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2012.720188.
[294]
Rolan, G. 2015. Towards Archive 2.0: issues in archival systems interoperability. Archives and Manuscripts. 43, 1 (Jan. 2015), 42–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.959535.
[295]
Ruddock, B. 2011. Linked Data and the LOCAH project. Business Information Review. 28, 2 (Jun. 2011), 105–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382111404013.
[296]
Sachs, A. 2006. Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria. 62, (2006).
[297]
Sachs, H.R. 2008. Reconstructing a Life: The Archival Challenges of Women’s History. Library Trends. 56, 3 (2008), 650–666. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2008.0018.
[298]
Samuels, H. 1991. Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria. 33, (1991).
[299]
Scanlan, K. 2011. ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction. The American Archivist. 74, (2011).
[300]
Schellenberg, T. R. 1956. Modern archives: principles and techniques. F.W. Cheshire.
[301]
Schellenberg, T. R. 1956. Modern archives: principles and techniques. F.W. Cheshire.
[302]
Schwartz, J.M. and Cook, T. 2002. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2, 1–2 (Mar. 2002), 1–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.
[303]
Schwartz, J.M. and Cook, T. 2002. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2, 1–2 (Mar. 2002), 1–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.
[304]
SCOTT, M. 1997. Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal. 7, 2 (1997), 101–114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/eb027107.
[305]
Sellie, A. et al. 2015. Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture. Archival Science. 15, 4 (Dec. 2015), 453–472. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5.
[306]
Sexton, A. et al. 2004. Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, 1 (Apr. 2004), 33–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000199133.
[307]
Shepherd, E. 2009. Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Ashgate.
[308]
Shepherd, E. 2007. Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 2 (Oct. 2007), 125–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701607736.
[309]
Shepherd, E. 2015. Freedom of Information, Right to Access Information, Open Data: Who is at the Table? The Round Table. 104, 6 (Nov. 2015), 715–726. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101.
[310]
Shepherd, E. 2017. Pioneering women archivists in England: Ethel Stokes (1870–1944), record agent. Archival Science. 17, 2 (Jun. 2017), 175–194. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9272-x.
[311]
Shepherd, E. et al. 2011. Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal. 21, 2 (2011), 122–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111152053.
[312]
Shepherd, E. et al. 2009. The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 30, 2 (Oct. 2009), 227–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903445000.
[313]
Shepherd, Elizabeth 2009. Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Ashgate.
[314]
Shilton, K. and Srinivasan, R. 2007. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. Archivaria. 63, (2007).
[315]
Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly: .
[316]
Sims, F. 2002. A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal. 12, 1 (2002), 8–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690210427743.
[317]
Sinn, D. and Syn, S.Y. 2013. Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life? Archival Science. (Jul. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9208-7.
[318]
Smit, F. ed. 2017. Archives in Liquid Times. Dutch Society for Archival Publications (S@P).
[319]
Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources: 1987. .
[320]
Stevens, M. et al. 2010. New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 16, 1–2 (Jan. 2010), 59–76. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441770.
[321]
Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory: 1999. .
[322]
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record 1998. The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. Riksarkivet.
[323]
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance and Sweden 1994. The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. Swedish National Archives.
[324]
Strauss, A. 2014. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. (Sep. 2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3.
[325]
Strauss, A. 2014. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. (Sep. 2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3.
[326]
Strauss, A. 2015. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. 15, 4 (Dec. 2015), 369–397. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3.
[327]
Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties: 1996. .
[328]
Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology): 1996. .
[329]
Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology): 1996. .
[330]
Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping: .
[331]
Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice: .
[332]
Sue McKemmish 2005. Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University. 1–20.
[333]
Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex: .
[334]
Susan Pell 2015. Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive: An Ethnographic Reading of an Activist Archive. Archivaria. 80, (2015), 33–57.
[335]
Taavetti, R. 2015. A marshall in love. Remembering and forgetting queer pasts in the Finnish archives. Archival Science. (Jul. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9251-7.
[336]
Taylor, I. 2016. The German appraisal discussion since 1990: an overview. Archives and Manuscripts. 44, 1 (Jan. 2016), 14–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2015.1136226.
[337]
The American Archivist - Breaking the Language Barrier: Describing Chicano Archives with Bilingual Finding Aids: http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.77.2.p66l555g15g981p6.
[338]
The American Archivist - Crippling the Archives: Negotiating Notions of Disability in Appraisal and Arrangement and Description: http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.1.c53h4712017n4728.
[339]
The American Archivist - EAD Tag Usage: Community Analysis of the Use of Encoded Archival Description Elements: http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.76.2.x4h78gx76780q072.
[340]
The American Archivist - Leveraging Encoded Archival Description for Access to Digital Content: A Cost and Usability Analysis: http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.1.5641v61p422u0u90.
[341]
The Appraisal of Modern Records: .
[342]
The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review: .
[343]
The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html.
[344]
The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time: .
[345]
The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective: .
[346]
The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds: .
[347]
The National Archives The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
[348]
The Place of Theory in Archival Practice: 1999. .
[349]
The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project: .
[350]
Theimer, K. 2011. What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist. 74, 1 (Apr. 2011), 58–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666.
[351]
Thurston, A. 2014. Integrity in government through records management: essays in honour of Anne Thurston. Ashgate.
[352]
Tom Nesmith 2002. Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist. 65, (2002).
[353]
Tough, A. 2011. Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal. 21, 3 (2011), 225–236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111186894.
[354]
Toward More Honest Description | The American Archivist: http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.26.
[355]
Towards an Archival Concept of Evidence: .
[356]
Trace, C.B. 2002. What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science. 2, 1–2 (Mar. 2002), 137–159. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435634.
[357]
Tschan, R. 2002. A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist. 65, 2 (Sep. 2002), 176–195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1.
[358]
Upward, F. 2000. Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal. 10, 3 (2000), 115–139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259.
[359]
Valge, J. and Kibal, B. 2007. Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 2 (Oct. 2007), 193–214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611951.
[360]
Vilar, P. and Sauperl, A. 2015. Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives. International Journal of Information Management. 35, 5 (Oct. 2015), 551–560. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001.
[361]
Vukliš, V Archival Activism: Emerging Forms, Local Applications.
[362]
Wakimoto, D.K. et al. 2013. Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science. 13, 4 (Dec. 2013), 293–316. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1.
[363]
Wallace, David A. and Cox, Richard J. 2002. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books.
[364]
Wallace, David A. and Cox, Richard J. 2002. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books.
[365]
Wamukoya, J. 2000. Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal. 10, 1 (2000), 23–33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007254.
[366]
What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? .
[367]
What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper: .
[368]
When Archivists and Digital Asset Managers Collide: Tensions and Ways Forward | The American Archivist: http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.121.
[369]
Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668.
[370]
Wilson, J.Z. and Golding, F. 2015. Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze. Archival Science. (Oct. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3.
[371]
Wisniewski, Timothy. 2008. Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image. 7, 2 (2008), 1–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/mov.2008.0002.
[372]
Wood, S. et al. 2014. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 397–419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1.
[373]
Wood, S. et al. 2014. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science. 14, 3–4 (Oct. 2014), 397–419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1.
[374]
Wooldridge, J.M. 2013. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning.
[375]
WORTHY, B. 2010. More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance. 23, 4 (Sep. 2010), 561–582. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x.
[376]
Worthy, B. and Hazell, R. 2017. Disruptive, Dynamic and Democratic? Ten Years of FOI in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs. 70, 1 (Jan. 2017), 22–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv069.
[377]
Yaco, S. and Hardy, B.B. 2013. Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science. 13, 2–3 (Jun. 2013), 253–272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0.
[378]
Yakel, E. 2003. Archival representation. Archival Science. 3, 1 (Mar. 2003), 1–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438926.
[379]
Yakel, E. and Bost, L.L. Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivist.
[380]
Yakel, E. and Torres, D. 2003. AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist. 66, 1 (Jan. 2003), 51–78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800.
[381]
Yeo, G. Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age.
[382]
Yeo, G. 2007. Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist. 70, 2 (Sep. 2007), 315–343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q.
[383]
Yeo, G. 2008. Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist. 71, 1 (Apr. 2008), 118–143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2.
[384]
Yeo, G. 2010. ‘Nothing is the same as something else’: significant properties and notions of identity and originality. Archival Science. 10, 2 (2010), 85–116.
[385]
Yeo, G. 2011. Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal. 21, 1 (2011), 8–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125071.
[386]
Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology): 1997. .
[387]
Zhang, J. Original Order in Digital Archives.
[388]
An argument for Archiving Facebook as a Heterogeneous Personal Store.
[389]
2016. BS ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation. Records management. Concepts and principles. BSI.
[390]
Describing Archives A Content Standard.
[391]
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis.
[392]
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework.
[393]
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio.
[394]
Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud.
[395]
Rethinking the Web as a Personal Archive. Microsoft Research.
[396]
‘Say nothing’: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas.
[397]
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf.
[398]
1999. Standards for Archival Description: A Handbook. (1999).
[399]
2007. The Almost Accidental Archive and its Impact on Literary Subjects and Canonicity. Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études canadiennes. 40, 2 (Aug. 2007), 96–108.
[400]
The Guide to Researching Audiences.
[401]
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation.
[402]
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond.
[403]
2009. The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends. 57, 3 (2009), 490–515. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0049.
