1
Jenkinson, Hilary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Manual of archive administration. 1922. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
2
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: : F.W. Cheshire 1956. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
3
BS ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation. Records management. Concepts and principles. BSI 2016. https://bsol.bsigroup.com/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030298891
4
Sue McKemmish. Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In: Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: : Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005. 1–20.
5
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist 2007;70:315–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
6
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
7
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. London: : Facet Publishing 2016. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
8
Rekrut A. Matters of substance: materiality and meaning in historical records and their digital images. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:238–47. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.958865
9
Smit F, editor. Archives in Liquid Times. Dutch Society for Archival Publications (S@P) 2017. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30942
10
Dever M. Photographs and manuscripts: working in the archive. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:282–94. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.956322
11
Acker A. How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture. Archival Science 2015;15:1–24. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x
12
Gilliland AJ, Caswell M. Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science Published Online First: 7 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z
13
Upward F. Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal 2000;10:115–39. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007259
14
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist 2008;71:118–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2
15
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework.
16
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record. The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. [Stockholm]: : Riksarkivet 1998.
17
Wooldridge JM. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 5th ed. Mason, Ohio: : South-Western Cengage Learning 2013.
18
Duranti, Luciana, Thibodeau, Kenneth. The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science 2006;6:13–68. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7
19
Atherton, Jay. From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria 1985.
20
Kahle B. Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist 2007;70:23–31. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845
21
Craven, Louise. What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2008. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315547497
22
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, et al. International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. Padova: : CLEUP 2008.
23
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: : Libraries Unlimited 2010.
24
Heather M. Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record. 2000.
25
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Australia. The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years. Clayton: : Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives 1994.
26
Sue M. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology). 1997.
27
Jennifer M. Towards an Archival Concept of Evidence.
28
Menne-Haritz, Angelika. Business processes: an archival science approach to collaborative decision making, records, and knowledge management. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004.
29
Pearce-Moses R. Janus in Cyberspace: Archives on the Threshold of the Digital Era. The American Archivist 2007;70:13–22. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.1.n7121165223j6t83
30
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science 2002;2:1–19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
31
Trace CB. What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science 2002;2:137–59. doi:10.1007/BF02435634
32
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties. 1996.
33
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.
34
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis.
35
Yeo G. Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal 2011;21:8–27. doi:10.1108/09565691111125071
36
Yeo G. ‘Nothing is the same as something else’: significant properties and notions of identity and originality. Archival Science 2010;10:85–116.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-010-9119-9
37
Ketelaar E. Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science 2012;12:19–33. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5
38
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
39
Lemieux VL. The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal 2010;20:199–216. doi:10.1108/09565691011064331
40
Moss M. The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See. The English Historical Review 2005;120:577–92. doi:10.1093/ehr/cei121
41
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 2010;27:312–21. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006
42
Longmore B. The Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011: creating a culture that values public records. Archives and Records 2013;34:248–62. doi:10.1080/23257962.2013.830067
43
Worthy B, Hazell R. Disruptive, Dynamic and Democratic? Ten Years of FOI in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs 2017;70:22–42. doi:10.1093/pa/gsv069
44
Thurston A. Integrity in government through records management: essays in honour of Anne Thurston. Farnham, Surrey, England: : Ashgate 2014.
45
Bearman, D. (2006), "Moments of risk: identifying threats to electronic records”, Archivaria, Vol. 62, pp. 15-42. Archivaria 62 (Fall 2006). http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/issue/view/432
46
‘Say nothing’: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.859573
47
Henttonen P. Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science 2017;17:285–303. doi:10.1007/s10502-017-9277-0
48
Shepherd E. Freedom of Information, Right to Access Information, Open Data: Who is at the Table? The Round Table 2015;104:715–26. doi:10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101
49
Duchein M. The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist 1992;55:14–25. doi:10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888
50
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: : Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005.
51
WORTHY B. More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance 2010;23:561–82. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x
52
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
53
Birkinshaw P. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: : Tottel 2005.
54
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/
55
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: : Quorum Books 2002.
56
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: : Libraries Unlimited 2010.
57
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2009;30:227–48. doi:10.1080/00379810903445000
58
Shepherd E. Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:125–38. doi:10.1080/00379810701607736
59
Holmlund, Mona, Avery, Cheryl. Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. London: : University of Toronto Press 2010. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442689879
60
McLeod J. Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal 2012;22:92–7. doi:10.1108/09565691211268711
61
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal 2011;21:122–34. doi:10.1108/09565691111152053
62
Bailey S, Vidyarthi J. Human-computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle? Records Management Journal 2010;20:279–90. doi:10.1108/09565691011095300
63
McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L. Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science 2011;11:211–39. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2
64
Dirks J. Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria 2004;57.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/viewFile/12451/13554
65
Tough A. Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal 2011;21:225–36. doi:10.1108/09565691111186894
66
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World.
67
Birkinshaw P. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: : Tottel 2005.
68
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
69
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio.
70
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: : Quorum Books 2002.
71
Meijer A. Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
72
Jimerson RC. Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 2011;39.
73
Hurley C. Archivists and Accountability. 2006;34.
74
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: : Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005.
75
Wamukoya J. Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal 2000;10:23–33. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007254
76
Procter, Margaret, Cook, Michael, Williams, Caroline. Political pressure and the archival record. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2005.
77
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: : Facet 2006.
78
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.
79
Hurley C. Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 2002;30.
80
Adami TA, Hunt M. Genocidal Archives: The African Context—Genocide in Rwanda. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2005;26:105–21. doi:10.1080/00039810500047557
81
Robinson G. Break the rules, save the records: human rights archives and the search for justice in East Timor. Archival Science 2014;14:323–43. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9228-y
82
Halilovich H. Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science 2014;14:231–47. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z
83
Dominy G. ‘We must remember our past so that we do not repeat it’ Archiving and Accessing the Records of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2005.
84
McKemmish S, Gililand AJ, Lau A, editors. Research in the archival multiverse. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: : Monash University Publishing 2017. http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=628143
85
Kirk D, Sellen A. On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. Microsoft Researchhttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/on-human-remains-value-and-practice-in-the-home-archiving-of-cherished-objects/
86
Gilliland A, Flinn A. Community Archives: What are we really talking about? In: Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. Centre for Community Networking Research, Centre for Social Informatics, Monash University http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/920626/gilliland_flinn_keynote.pdf
87
McKemmish S, Piggott M. Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria 2013;76.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13461/14781
88
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:151–76. doi:10.1080/00379810701611936
89
McKemmish S. Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).
90
Catherine Hobbs. The Character of Personal Archives: Reflections on the Value of Records of Individuals. Archivaria 2001;52.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12817/14028
91
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
92
Flinn A. Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: : Facet 2011. 145–69.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f8a3983f-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
93
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials.
94
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network.
95
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science 2010;10:353–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
96
Krebs AB. Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science 2012;12:173–90. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2
97
Riley T. Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs. 2009.http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf
98
Thorpe K. Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field. 2013.http://library.ifla.org/99/
99
Roy L, Trace C, Gilbert S. Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals. 2013.http://library.ifla.org/108/
100
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist 2011;74:185–210. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
101
Gilliland AJ. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science 2014;14:249–74. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
102
Cifor M. Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Archival Science Published Online First: 2 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5
103
Cifor M, Gilliland AJ. Affect and the archive, archives and their affects: an introduction to the special issue. Archival Science Published Online First: 20 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9263-3
104
Cifor, Marika C Michelle. ‘To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing’: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives. American Archivist 2016;79.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0nd5g0p7
105
Caswell, ML. Seeing Yourself in History: Community Archives in the Fight Against Symbolic Annihilation. The Public Historian: a journal of public history Published Online First: 2016.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gc14537#page-1
106
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:83–109. doi:10.1080/00379810802515069
107
Harris V. Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science 2014;14:215–29. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5
108
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: : Facet 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
109
Wilson JZ, Golding F. Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze. Archival Science Published Online First: 5 October 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3
110
Cooper D. House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives. Archival Science Published Online First: 16 July 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8
111
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers.
112
Leighton John J. Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1. 2010.
113
Hawkins DT. Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Medford, N.J.: : Information Today, Inc 2013.
114
Riva A. Pollard. The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review. Archivaria 2001;52.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12818/14030
115
Jennifer Meehan. Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records. Archivaria 2010;70:27–44.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13294
116
Creighton Barrett. Respect Which Fonds? Personal Archives and Family Businesses in Nova Scotia. Archivaria 2013;76:75–92.https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13459
117
Amelia Acker. Death, Memorialization, and Social Media: A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives. Archivaria 2014;77:1–23.https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13469
118
Anna Chen. Disorder: Vocabularies of Hoarding in Personal Digital Archiving Practices. Archivaria 2014;78:115–34.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13507
119
Rethinking the Web as a Personal Archive. Microsoft Researchhttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/rethinking-the-web-as-a-personal-archive/
120
An argument for Archiving Facebook as a Heterogeneous Personal Store. http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/~marshall/DL14-marshall-and-shipman.pdf
121
Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud. http://willodom.com/publications/paper1202-odom.pdf
122
McKemmish S, Gililand AJ, Lau A, editors. Research in the archival multiverse. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: : Monash University Publishing 2017.
123
Mortensen P. The Place of Theory in Archival Practice. 1999.
124
Cook, Terry. What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria 1997;:17–63.
125
Anne G. The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html
126
International Council on Archives. Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description. Archivaria 1992;1.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11837/12789
127
Groth P, Gil Y, Cheney J, et al. Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation 2012;7. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213
128
Duranti L. From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548
129
Millar L. The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.
130
MacNeil H. Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.
131
Ketelaar E. Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.
132
Cook, Terry. The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria 1993;35.
133
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., et al. Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2003.
134
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, Sweden. The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. [Stockholm]: : Swedish National Archives 1994.
135
Brothman B. Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice. 1991.
136
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1. 1989.
137
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2. 1989.
138
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3. 1990.
139
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4. 1990.
140
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5. 1991.
141
Duranti, Luciana. Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Lanham, Md: : Scarecrow Press 1998.
142
Duranti L. Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.
143
Duranti L, MacNeil H. The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.
144
Eastwood T. Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies. 1993.
145
Eastwood T. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?
146
Horsman P. The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.
147
MacNeil H. Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.
148
Nesmith T. Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory. 1999.
149
Ridener, John. From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Duluth, Minn: : Litwin Books 2009.
150
Roberts J. Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.
151
Roberts J. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.
152
Duranti L. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal 2010;20:78–95. doi:10.1108/09565691011039852
153
Cumming K. Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal 2010;20:41–52. doi:10.1108/09565691011036224
154
Mak B. On the Uses of Authenticity. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13381/14688
155
Geoffrey Yeo. The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13384/14691
156
Yeo G. Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13407/14713
157
Zhang J. Original Order in Digital Archives. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13410/14719
158
Duranti L. Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria 1992;35.https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92f1/d3b23cfc46f8c4ed7638ca58fac9c05c4574.pdf
159
O’Meara E, Tuomala M. Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13385/14693
160
Fear K, Donaldson DR. Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science 2012;12:319–39. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7
161
Williams C. Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.
162
Bazerman C. The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science 2012;12:377–88. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1
163
Bunn J. Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science Published Online First: 12 March 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2
164
Cook T. ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2011;32:173–89. doi:10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
165
Duff WM, Harris V. Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science 2002;2:263–85. doi:10.1007/BF02435625
166
Wood S, Carbone K, Cifor M, et al. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science 2014;14:397–419. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
167
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf. https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20
168
Lager Vestberg N. Archival Value. Photographies 2008;1:49–65. doi:10.1080/17540760701786725
169
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. London: : Facet Publishing 2016. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
170
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
171
Schellenberg TR. The Appraisal of Modern Records.
172
Cumming K, Picot A. Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:133–45. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.926824
173
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond.
174
Cook T. Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science 2006;5:101–61. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2
175
Booms H. Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources. 1987.
176
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science 2013;13:207–16. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y
177
Abraham T. Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist 1991;54:44–52. doi:10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227
178
Cox R. The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.
179
Bailey C. Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13432/14742
180
Boles F, Young J. Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist 1985;48:121–40. doi:10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw
181
Hohmann P. On Impartiality and Interrelatedness: Reactions to Jenkinsonian Appraisal in the Twentieth Century. The American Archivist 2016;79:14–25. doi:10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.14
182
Cynthia K. Sauer. Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist 2001;64:308–49.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40294175?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Doing&searchText=the&searchText=best&searchText=we&searchText=can?&searchText=The&searchText=use&searchText=of&searchText=collection&searchText=development&searchText=policies&searchText=and&searchText=cooperative&searchText=collecting&searchText=activities&searchText=at&searchText=manuscript&searchText=repositories&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DDoing%2Bthe%2Bbest%2Bwe%2Bcan%253F%2BThe%2Buse%2Bof%2Bcollection%2Bdevelopment%2Bpolicies%2Band%2Bcooperative%2Bcollecting%2Bactivities%2Bat%2Bmanuscript%2Brepositories%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000557%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
183
Wisniewski Timothy. Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image 2008;7:1–24. doi:10.1353/mov.2008.0002
184
Mancuso L. Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts 2013;41:146–59. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.801101
185
Harvey R, Thompson D. Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech 2010;28:313–22. doi:10.1108/07378831011047703
186
Kretzschmar R. Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science 2006;5:219–38. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y
187
Taylor I. The German appraisal discussion since 1990: an overview. Archives and Manuscripts 2016;44:14–23. doi:10.1080/01576895.2015.1136226
188
Cook M. Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal 2010;20:72–7. doi:10.1108/09565691011039843
189
Kim Y, Ross S. Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2013;50:1–10. doi:10.1002/meet.14505001042
190
The Almost Accidental Archive and its Impact on Literary Subjects and Canonicity. Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études canadiennes 2007;40:96–108.http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_canadian_studies/v040/40.2tector.html
191
Eastwood T. Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.
192
The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends 2009;57:490–515. doi:10.1353/lib.0.0049
193
Pollard R. The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review.
194
Carvalho C. Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal 2001;11:175–205. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007274
195
FORTIER N. Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science 2005;5:343–60. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z
196
Sims F. A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal 2002;12:8–13. doi:10.1108/09565690210427743
197
Cox, Richard J. No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Lanham, Md: : Scarecrow Press 2004.
198
Cook, Terry, Samuels, Helen Willa. Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2011.
199
Arias PB. Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal 2008;18:205–20. doi:10.1108/09565690810916456
200
Boles, Frank. Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2005.
201
Samuels H. Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria 1991;33.
202
Jonker AEM. No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2009;30:67–80. doi:10.1080/00379810903264625
203
Tschan R. A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist 2002;65:176–95. doi:10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1
204
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. 2007.
205
Cox R, Samuels H. The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist 1988;51:28–42. doi:10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8
206
Alexander P, Samuels H. The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist 1987;50:518–31. doi:10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u
207
Honer E, Graham S. Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.
208
Craig, Barbara Lazenby. Archival appraisal: theory and practice. München: : K.G. Saur 2004.
209
SCOTT M. Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal 1997;7:101–14. doi:10.1108/eb027107
210
Bunn J. Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records 2013;34:235–47. doi:10.1080/23257962.2013.830066
211
Gartner R. An XML schema for enhancing the semantic interoperability of archival description. Archival Science 2015;15:295–313. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9225-1
212
Archival Descriptions through the Looking Glass: Paratexts in Wonderland | The American Archivist. http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.137
213
Toward More Honest Description | The American Archivist. http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.26
214
Standards for Archival Description: A Handbook. Published Online First: 1999.http://www.archivists.org/catalog/stds99/
215
Describing Archives A Content Standard. http://files.archivists.org/pubs/DACS2E-2013_v0315.pdf
216
Niu J. Organisation and description of datasets. Archives and Manuscripts 2016;44:73–85. doi:10.1080/01576895.2016.1179585
217
Gracy KF. Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science 2015;15:239–94. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2
218
The American Archivist - Leveraging Encoded Archival Description for Access to Digital Content: A Cost and Usability Analysis. http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.1.5641v61p422u0u90
219
The American Archivist - Crippling the Archives: Negotiating Notions of Disability in Appraisal and Arrangement and Description. http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.1.c53h4712017n4728
220
The American Archivist - EAD Tag Usage: Community Analysis of the Use of Encoded Archival Description Elements. http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.76.2.x4h78gx76780q072
221
Metadata Object Description Schema: MODS (Library of Congress). http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/
222
Riley J, Shepherd K. A Brave New World: Archivists and Shareable Descriptive Metadata - American Archivist - Volume 72, Number 1 / Spring/Summer 2009 - Society of American Archivists. 2009.
223
MacNeil H. What finding aids do: archival description as rhetorical genre in traditional and web-based environments. Archival Science 2012;12:485–500. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9175-4
224
The American Archivist - Breaking the Language Barrier: Describing Chicano Archives with Bilingual Finding Aids. http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.77.2.p66l555g15g981p6
225
Clough P, Tang J, Hall MM, et al. Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings 2011;63:127–47. doi:10.1108/00012531111135628
226
Ruddock B. Linked Data and the LOCAH project. Business Information Review 2011;28:105–11. doi:10.1177/0266382111404013
227
Rolan G. Towards Archive 2.0: issues in archival systems interoperability. Archives and Manuscripts 2015;43:42–60. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.959535
228
Eito-Brun R. Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science Published Online First: 2 February 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3
229
Yakel E. Archival representation. Archival Science 2003;3:1–25. doi:10.1007/BF02438926
230
Niu J. Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science Published Online First: 13 June 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4
231
Guide to archival software.
232
Jenkinson H. A manual of archive administration. 2nd ed. reprinted. Lund, Humphries 1965.
233
Reed B. Reinventing access. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:123–32. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.926823
234
Eastwood T, MacNeil H. Currents of archival thinking. Santa Barbara, Calif: : Libraries Unlimited 2010.
235
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
236
Michele V. Cloonan. The Boundaries of Preservation and Conservation Research. Libraries & the Cultural Record 2011;46:220–9.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23053599?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
237
Vilar P, Sauperl A. Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives. International Journal of Information Management 2015;35:551–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001
238
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012. 2012. http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
239
Menne-Haritz A. Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science 2001;1:57–82. doi:10.1007/BF02435639
240
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: : F.W. Cheshire 1956.
241
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation. https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html
242
Council of Europe. Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum. 2003.
243
Valge J, Kibal B. Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:193–214. doi:10.1080/00379810701611951
244
Blais G. Access to Archival Records: A Review of Current Issues: A RAMP Study. 1995.
245
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society.
246
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. doi:[object Object]
247
The National Archives. The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
248
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205). 2009.
249
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology). 1996.
250
Barbara Reed. Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the potential of pluralised recordkeeping.
251
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist 2011;74:185–210. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
252
Flanagan M, Carini P. How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist 2012;75:514–37. doi:10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4
253
Duff W, Johnson C. Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist 2003;66:79–95. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n
254
Prom C. Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist 2011;74:158–84. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v
255
Fear K. User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist 2010;73:26–60. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551
256
Daniels M, Yakel E. Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist 2010;73:535–68. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357
257
Altman B, Nemmers J. The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist 2001;64:121–31. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74
258
Yakel E, Bost LL. Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivisthttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40293870
259
Yakel E, Torres D. AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist 2003;66:51–78. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800
260
The Guide to Researching Audiences.
261
Daines JG, Nimer CL. Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization 2011;9:4–31. doi:10.1080/15332748.2011.574019
262
Sexton A, Turner C, Yeo G, et al. Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2004;25:33–49. doi:10.1080/0037981042000199133
263
Chapman A. Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2004;25:149–55. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271475
264
Huvila I. Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science 2008;8:15–36. doi:10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
265
Hill A. Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2004;25:139–48. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271466
266
Procter M. What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2010;31:15–27. doi:10.1080/00379811003658476
267
Broady-Preston J. The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management 2010;31:66–78. doi:10.1108/01435121011013412
268
Neazor M. Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. Published Online First: 2007.http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13146/14390
269
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. London: : Facet Publishing 2016. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
270
Scanlan K. ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction. The American Archivist 2011;74.http://www.jstor.org/stable/23079045?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
271
Jimerson RC. Ethical Concerns for Archivists. The Public Historian 2006;28:87–92. doi:10.1525/tph.2006.28.1.87
272
Millar, Laura. Explaining Ourselves: 40 Years of Archivaria. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13542
273
Gilliland AJ, Halilovich H. Migrating memories: transdisciplinary pedagogical approaches to teaching about diasporic memory, identity and human rights in archival studies. Archival Science 2017;17:79–96. doi:10.1007/s10502-016-9265-9
274
Dingwall G. Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist 2004;67:11–30. doi:10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4
275
Ismail A, Jamaludin A. Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal 2011;21:69–75. doi:10.1108/09565691111125116
276
Cline S. ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist 2009;72:331–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14
277
Gale C. Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2006;27:17–27. doi:10.1080/00039810600691221
278
Shepherd, Elizabeth. Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. In: Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: : Ashgate 2009. doi:https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780754681922/startPage/186
279
Jenkinson, Hilary. The English archivist: a new profession. London: : H.K. Lewis 1948.
280
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science Published Online First: 3 September 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
281
Elizabeth G, Rebecca S. ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258200542_Golden_Age_Quiescence_and_Revival
282
Currall J, Moss M. We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal 2008;18:69–91. doi:10.1108/09565690810858532
283
McLeod J, Hare C. Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal 2010;20:9–40. doi:10.1108/09565691011036215
284
Benedict, Karen M., Society of American Archivists. Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2003.
285
Cook M. Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2006;27:1–15. doi:10.1080/00039810600691205
286
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: : Facet 2006.
287
Danielson, Elena S. The ethical archivist. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2010.
288
MacNeil, Heather. Without consent: the ethics of disclosing personal information in public archives. [Chicago, Ill.]: : Scarecrow Press 1992.
289
Procter, Margaret, Lewis, C. P., Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies. New directions in archival research. Liverpool: : Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies 2000.
290
Shepherd E. Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: : Ashgate 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780754681922
291
Gauld C. Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist. Archival Science Published Online First: 12 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4
292
Cook T. Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies 2007.
293
Greene M. A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist 2013;76:302–34. doi:10.17723/aarc.76.2.14744l214663kw43
294
Jimerson R. Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist 2013;76:335–45. doi:10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21
295
Findlay C. Archival activism. Archives and Manuscripts 2016;44:155–9. doi:10.1080/01576895.2016.1263964
296
Bastian J. Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria 2002.
297
Duff WM, Flinn A, Suurtamm KE, et al. Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science 2013;13. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
298
Ricardo P, Michelle C. Critical Directions for Archival Approaches to Social Justice. The Library Quarterlyhttp://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/684145
299
Jacobsen T, Punzalan RL, Hedstrom ML. Invoking "collective memory”: mapping the emergence of a concept in archival science. Archival Science 2013;13:217–51. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9199-4
300
Shepherd E. Pioneering women archivists in England: Ethel Stokes (1870–1944), record agent. Archival Science 2017;17:175–94. doi:10.1007/s10502-016-9272-x
301
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science Published Online First: 3 September 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
302
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense of Professional Rebirth:Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives.
303
Caswell M. Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist 2013;76.http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.76.2.89324135v02r2q74
304
Matthews RJ. Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism. Archival Science Published Online First: 13 June 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2
305
Butler B. ‘Othering’ the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory. Archival Science 2009;9:57–69. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0
306
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria 2001;51.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12792/13989
307
Vukliš, V. Archival Activism: Emerging Forms, Local Applications. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/112790sz#page-1
308
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science 2015;15:369–97. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
309
Susan Pell. Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive: An Ethnographic Reading of an Activist Archive. Archivaria 2015;80:33–57.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13543/14896
310
Harris V. Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria 1997;44.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12200/13217
311
Flinn A, Alexander B. "Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving. Archival Science 2015;15:329–35. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6
312
MacNeil H. Trust and professional identity: narratives, counter-narratives and lingering ambiguities. Archival Science 2011;11:175–92. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9150-5
313
Duranti L. Archives as place. Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Researchhttp://archivo.cartagena.es/files/36-165-DOC_FICHERO1/07-duranti_archives.pdf
314
Gilliland A. Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science 2011;11:193–209. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0
315
Evans J, McKemmish S, Daniels E, et al. Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Archival Science 2015;15:337–68. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6
316
Sellie A, Goldstein J, Fair M, et al. Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture. Archival Science 2015;15:453–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5
317
Jimerson, Randall C., Society of American Archivists. Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2009.
318
Flinn A. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies 2011;7.
319
Bastian J. A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist 2001;64:96–114. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377
320
Findlay C. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts 2013;41:7–22. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
321
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology). 1996.
322
Findlay C. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts 2013;41:7–22. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
323
Brothman B. Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria 1999;48.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12717/13894
324
Tom Nesmith. Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist 2002;65.https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.65.1.rr48450509r0712u
325
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria 2001;51.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12793/13991
326
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science 2002;2:1–19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
327
Ham G. Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist 1981;44–3.
328
Kallberg M. Archivists 2.0: redefining the archivist’s profession in the digital age. Records Management Journal 2012;22:98–115. doi:10.1108/09565691211268162
329
Joseph P, Debowski S, Goldschmidt P. Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities: implications for ISO 15489’s implementation. Records Management Journal 2012;22:57–75. doi:10.1108/09565691211222108
330
Cook T, Schwartz JM. Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science 2002;2:171–85. doi:10.1007/BF02435620
331
Cook T. Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science 2001;1:3–24. doi:10.1007/BF02435636
332
Harris V. The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science 2002;2:63–86. doi:10.1007/BF02435631
333
Ketelaar E. Archives as Spaces of Memory. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:9–27. doi:10.1080/00379810802499678
334
Cline S. "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist Published Online First: 2012.https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.2.03193j1517858r34
335
Sachs A. Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria 2006;62.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12887/14118
336
Hamilton, Carolyn. Refiguring the archive. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic 2002.
337
Derrida, Jacques, Prenowitz, Eric. Archive fever: a Freudian impression. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1996.
338
Sachs HR. Reconstructing a Life: The Archival Challenges of Women’s History. Library Trends 2008;56:650–66. doi:10.1353/lib.2008.0018
339
Caswell M. Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights. Archival Science 2014;14:207–13. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0
340
Gilliland AJ. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science 2014;14:249–74. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
341
Wood S, Carbone K, Cifor M, et al. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science 2014;14:397–419. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
342
Buchanan A, Bastian M. Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects. Archival Science 2015;15:429–51. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3
343
Taavetti R. A marshall in love. Remembering and forgetting queer pasts in the Finnish archives. Archival Science Published Online First: 29 July 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9251-7
344
Redwine G. Personal Digital Archiving. http://www.dpconline.org/advice/technology-watch-reports
345
Fryer C. Project to Production: Digital Preservation at the Houses of Parliament, 2010–2020. International Journal of Digital Curation 2015;10. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.378
346
Isto Huvila. The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature. http://www.istohuvila.se/files/IstoHuvilaUnbearableLightnessPreprint.pdf
347
Cook T. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science 2013;13:95–120. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
348
Gilliland, Anne J. The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,;24.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/346521tf
349
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives. Published Online First: 2012.http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
350
Bak G. Trusted by whom? TDRs, standards culture and the nature of trust. Archival Science 2016;16:373–402. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9257-1
351
Flinn, Andrew. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions. Interactions: UCLA journal of education and information studies 2011;7.http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9pt2490x
352
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
353
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:151–76. doi:10.1080/00379810701611936
354
Caswell M, Mallick S. Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:73–86. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.880931
355
Daniel D. Archival representations of immigration and ethnicity in North American history: from the ethnicization of archives to the archivization of ethnicity. Archival Science Published Online First: 1 August 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9209-6
356
Wakimoto DK, Bruce C, Partridge H. Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science 2013;13:293–316. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1
357
Theimer K. What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist 2011;74:58–68. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666
358
Caswell M. Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science 2014;14:307–22. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
359
When Archivists and Digital Asset Managers Collide: Tensions and Ways Forward | The American Archivist. http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.121
360
Kärberg T. Digital preservation of knowledge in the public sector: a pre-ingest tool. Archival Science 2015;15:83–95. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9211-z
361
Ray J. Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship 2009;24:357–68. doi:10.1080/09647770903314720
362
Cunningham A. Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist 2008;71:530–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507
363
Marty, Paul F. An introduction to digital convergence: libraries, archives, and museums in the information age. Archival Science 2008;8:247–50.http://search.proquest.com/docview/214894353?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
364
Marty PF. An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly 2010;80:1–5. doi:10.1086/648549
365
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4
366
Hill, Jennie. The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: : Facet 2011.
367
Lappin J. What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal 2010;20:252–64. doi:10.1108/09565691011095283
368
Cumming K, Findlay C. Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal 2010;20:265–78. doi:10.1108/09565691011095292
369
Higgins S. Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation 2011;6. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191
370
Lau AJ, Gilliland AJ, Anderson K. NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society 2012;15:991–1015. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404
371
Abrams S, Cruse P, Kunze J. Preservation Is Not a Place. International Journal of Digital Curation 2009;4. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v4i1.72
372
Cole J, Nolan J, Seko Y, et al. GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society 2011;13:1161–79. doi:10.1177/1461444811398032
373
Robinson H. Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship 2012;27:413–29. doi:10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
374
Lee C, Tibbo H. Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668
375
Elke Zobl. Cultural Production, Transnational Networking, and Critical Reflection in Feminist Zines. Signs 2009;35:1–12. doi:10.1086/599256
376
Crymble A. An Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Use by the Archival Community. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13298/14609
377
EICHHORN K. D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies 2010;39:622–46. doi:10.1080/00497878.2010.490716
378
Baker S, Huber A. Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2013;16:513–30. doi:10.1177/1367549413491721
379
Timms K. New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549
380
Marsden C. Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2001;22:17–23. doi:10.1080/00379810120037469
381
Ceeney N. The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:57–71. doi:10.1080/00379810802499868
382
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. Archivaria 2007;63.
383
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science 2010;10:353–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
384
Newman J. Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2012;33:57–73. doi:10.1080/00379816.2012.666404
385
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com. http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th
386
Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E. New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies 2010;16:59–76. doi:10.1080/13527250903441770
387
Moore S, Pell S. Autonomous archives. International Journal of Heritage Studies 2010;16:255–68. doi:10.1080/13527251003775513
388
Flinn, A. The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: : Facet 2011. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14509809360004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
389
Flinn, A. Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 2010;16:39–51. doi:10.1177/1354856509347707
390
Flinn A, Stevens M, Shepherd E. Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science 2009;9:71–86. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2
391
Flinn, A., Stevens, M. "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. In: Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: : Facet 2009. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047
392
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: : Facet 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
393
Gray V. ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:1–8. doi:10.1080/00379810802499652
394
Flinn, A., Pick, G. Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. In: Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report. London: : Greater London Authority 2009. http://www.mla.gov.uk/what/programmes/renaissance/regions/london/News_and_Resources/~/media/London/Files/2009/Publications/Embedding%20Shared%20Heritage_LOW%20resolution.ashx
395
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:83–109. doi:10.1080/00379810802515069
396
Anderson S, Allen R. Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist 2009;72:383–400. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416
397
Yaco S, Hardy BB. Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science 2013;13:253–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0
398
Kalfatovic MR, Kapsalis E, Spiess KP, et al. Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science 2008;8:267–77. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y
399
Sinn D, Syn SY. Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life? Archival Science Published Online First: 14 July 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9208-7
400
Ramírez M. The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3 Published Online First: 2009.http://escholarship.org/uc/gseis_interactions?volume=5;issue=1
401
Green LJF. Cultural heritage, archives & citizenship: 1. Critical Arts 2007;21:308–20. doi:10.1080/02560040701810073
402
Ormond-Parker L, Sloggett R. Local archives and community collecting in the digital age. Archival Science 2012;12:191–212. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9154-1
403
Caswell M. Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science 2014;14:307–22. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
