Binford, Lewis R. 1962. ‘Archaeology as Anthropology’. American Antiquity 28(2):217–25.
Binford, Lewis R. 1981. ‘Behavioral Archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise”’. Journal of Anthropological Research 37(3):195–208.
Binford, Sally R., and Lewis Roberts Binford. 1968. ‘Archaeological Perspectives’. Pp. 5–32 in New perspectives in archaeology. Chicago: Aldine.
Brumfiel, E. n.d. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem – Gender, Class and Faction Steal the Show’. American Anthropologist 94:551–67.
Childe, V. G. 1935. ‘Changing Aims and Methods in Prehistory’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1:115–115.
Clarke, D. n.d. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47(185):6–18.
Clarke, David. 1973. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47(185):6–18.
Dunnell, R. C. 1988. ‘The Concept of Progress in Cultural Evolution’. Pp. 169–94 in Evolutionary progress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Earle, Timothy K. 2002. ‘Political Domination and Social Evolution’. Pp. 940–61 in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. Vol. Routledge world reference. London: Routledge.
Flannery, K. V. n.d. ‘The Cultural Evolution of Civilizations’. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3:339–426.
Gardner, Andrew. 2008. ‘Agency’. Pp. 95–108 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Hegmon, Michelle. 2003. ‘Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’. American Antiquity 68(2):213–43.
Hodder, I. 2012. ‘Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology’. Pp. 1–13 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Hodder, Ian. 1985. ‘Post-Processual Archaeology’. Pp. 1–26 in Advances in archaeological method and theory: v.8. London: Academic Press.
Hodder, Ian. 1991. ‘Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role’. American Antiquity 56(1):7–18.
Hodder, Ian. 1992. ‘Theoretical Archaeology: A Reactionary View’. Pp. 92–121 in Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge.
Hodder, Ian. 1999. ‘Towards a Reflexive Method’. Pp. 80–104 in The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder, Ian and Hutson, Scott. 2003. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, M. 1999. ‘Ch. 7: Postprocessual and Interpretative Archaeologies’. Pp. 98–115 in Archaeological theory: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, Matthew. 1999a. ‘Common Sense Is Not Enough’. Pp. 1–11 in Archaeological theory: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, Matthew. 1999b. ‘Postprocessual and Interpretative Archaeologies’. Pp. 98–115 in Archaeological theory: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, Matthew. 2010. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Leone, Mark P. 1987. ‘Toward a Critical Archaeology’. Current Anthropology 28(3):283–302.
Miller, Daniel, and Christopher Tilley. 1984. ‘Ideology, Power and Prehistory: An Introduction’. Pp. 1–15 in Ideology, power and prehistory. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, and Schiffer, Michael B. 2005. Archaeology as a Process: Processualism and Its Progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Patrik, L. 1985. ‘Is There an Archaeological Record?’ Pp. 27–62 in Advances in archaeological method and theory: v.8. London: Academic Press.
Preucel, R., and A. Bauer. n.d. ‘Archaeological Pragmatics’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34:85–96.
Preucel, R., and S. Mrozowski. 2010. ‘Introduction’. Pp. 3–49 in Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Renfrew, Colin. 1994. ‘Towards a Cognitive Archaeology’. Pp. 3–12 in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robb, J. n.d. ‘The Archaeology of Symbols.’ Annual Review of Anthropology 27:329–46.
Schiffer, Michael B. 1972. ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’. American Antiquity 37(2):156–65.
Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Tilley. 1989. ‘Archaeology into the 1990s’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 22(1):1–12. doi: 10.1080/00293652.1989.9965480.
Shott, M. n.d. ‘Status and Role of Formation Theory in Contemporary Archaeological Practice’. Journal of Archaeological Research 6:299–329.
Tilley, Christopher. 1989. ‘Interpreting Material Culture’. Pp. 185–94 in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge.
Trigger, Bruce. 2006. ‘Culture-Historical Archaeology’. Pp. 211–313 in A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 1978. ‘Current Trends in American Archaeology’. Pp. 2–18 in Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 1993. ‘Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology’. Pp. 159–200 in Archaeological method and theory v.5. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006a. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006b. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Webster, G. 2008. ‘Culture History: A Culture-Historical Approach’. Pp. 11–27 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Willey, G. R., Philip Phillips, and P. Phillips. 1958. ‘Ch. 1: Archaeological Unit Concepts’. Pp. 11–57 in Method and theory in American archaeology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Wylie, A. 1993. ‘A Proliferation of New Archaeologies: “Beyond Objectivism and Relatisivm”’. Pp. 20–26 in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yoffee, N. 1993. Too Many Chiefs? (Or Safe Texts for the 1990s). Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yoffee, N., and A. Sherratt. 1993. ‘Introduction: The Source of Archaeological Theory’. Pp. 1–10 in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.