[1]
Binford, L.R. 1962. Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity. 28, 2 (1962), 217–225.
[2]
Binford, L.R. 1981. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’. Journal of Anthropological Research. 37, 3 (1981), 195–208.
[3]
Binford, S.R. and Binford, L.R. 1968. Archaeological perspectives. New perspectives in archaeology. Aldine. 5–32.
[4]
Brumfiel, E. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: breaking and entering the ecosystem – gender, class and faction steal the show. American anthropologist. 94, 551–567.
[5]
Childe, V.G. 1935. Changing aims and methods in prehistory. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1, (1935), 115–115.
[6]
Clarke, D. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 47, 185 (1973), 6–18.
[7]
Clarke, D. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 47, 185, 6–18.
[8]
Dunnell, R.C. 1988. The concept of progress in cultural evolution. Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press. 169–194.
[9]
Earle, T.K. 2002. Political domination and social evolution. Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. Routledge. 940–961.
[10]
Flannery, K.V. The cultural evolution of civilizations. Annual review of ecology and systematics. 3, 339–426.
[11]
Gardner, A. 2008. Agency. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 95–108.
[12]
Hegmon, M. 2003. Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology. American Antiquity. 68, 2 (2003), 213–243.
[13]
Hodder, I. 1991. Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role. American Antiquity. 56, 1 (1991), 7–18.
[14]
Hodder, I. 2012. Introduction: contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 1–13.
[15]
Hodder, I. 1985. Post-processual archaeology. Advances in archaeological method and theory: v.8. Academic Press. 1–26.
[16]
Hodder, I. 1992. Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view. Theory and practice in archaeology. Routledge. 92–121.
[17]
Hodder, I. 1999. Towards a reflexive method. The archaeological process: an introduction. Blackwell. 80–104.
[18]
Hodder, Ian and Hutson, Scott 2003. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.
[19]
Johnson, M. 1999. Ch. 7: Postprocessual and interpretative archaeologies. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Blackwell. 98–115.
[20]
Johnson, M. 1999. Common sense is not enough. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Blackwell. 1–11.
[21]
Johnson, M. 1999. Postprocessual and interpretative archaeologies. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Blackwell. 98–115.
[22]
Johnson, Matthew 2010. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
[23]
Leone, M.P. 1987. Toward a Critical Archaeology. Current Anthropology. 28, 3 (1987), 283–302.
[24]
Miller, D. and Tilley, C. 1984. Ideology, power and prehistory: an introduction. Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge University Press. 1–15.
[25]
O’Brien, Michael J. et al. 2005. Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. University of Utah Press.
[26]
Patrik, L. 1985. Is there an archaeological record? Advances in archaeological method and theory: v.8. Academic Press. 27–62.
[27]
Preucel, R. and Bauer, A. Archaeological pragmatics. Norwegian archaeological review. 34, 85–96.
[28]
Preucel, R. and Mrozowski, S. 2010. Introduction. Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. Wiley-Blackwell. 3–49.
[29]
Renfrew, C. 1994. Towards a cognitive archaeology. The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 3–12.
[30]
Robb, J. The archaeology of symbols. Annual review of anthropology. 27, 329–346.
[31]
Schiffer, M.B. 1972. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity. 37, 2 (1972), 156–165.
[32]
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. 1989. Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 22, 1 (1989), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.1989.9965480.
[33]
Shott, M. Status and role of formation theory in contemporary archaeological practice. Journal of archaeological research. 6, 299–329.
[34]
Tilley, C. 1989. Interpreting material culture. The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. Routledge. 185–194.
[35]
Trigger, B. 2006. Culture-historical archaeology. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press. 211–313.
[36]
Trigger, B.G. 1978. Current trends in American archaeology. Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. Edinburgh University Press. 2–18.
[37]
Trigger, B.G. 1993. Marxism in contemporary western archaeology. Archaeological method and theory v.5. University of Arizona Press. 159–200.
[38]
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press.
[39]
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press.
[40]
Webster, G. 2008. Culture history: a culture-historical approach. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 11–27.
[41]
Willey, G.R. et al. 1958. Ch. 1: Archaeological unit concepts. Method and theory in American archaeology. Chicago University Press. 11–57.
[42]
Wylie, A. 1993. A proliferation of new archaeologies: ‘beyond objectivism and relatisivm’. Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?. Cambridge University Press. 20–26.
[43]
Yoffee, N. 1993. Too many chiefs? (Or safe texts for the 1990s). Cambridge University Press.
[44]
Yoffee, N. and Sherratt, A. 1993. Introduction: the source of archaeological theory. Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?. Cambridge University Press. 1–10.