[1]
Hodder, Ian and Hutson, Scott, Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[2]
Johnson, Matthew, Archaeological theory: an introduction, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[3]
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, and Schiffer, Michael B., Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2005.
[4]
Trigger, Bruce G., A history of archaeological thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[5]
I. Hodder, ‘Towards a reflexive method’, in The archaeological process: an introduction, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, pp. 80–104.
[6]
M. Johnson, ‘Common sense is not enough’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, pp. 1–11.
[7]
N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt, ‘Introduction: the source of archaeological theory’, in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 1–10.
[8]
A. Wylie, ‘A proliferation of new archaeologies: “beyond objectivism and relatisivm”’, in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 20–26.
[9]
B. Trigger, ‘Culture-historical archaeology’, in A history of archaeological thought, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 211–313.
[10]
V. G. Childe, ‘Changing aims and methods in prehistory’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, vol. 1, pp. 115–115, 1935.
[11]
G. R. Willey, P. Phillips, and P. Phillips, ‘Ch. 1: Archaeological unit concepts’, in Method and theory in American archaeology, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1958, pp. 11–57.
[12]
G. Webster, ‘Culture history: a culture-historical approach’, in Handbook of archaeological theories, Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 11–27.
[13]
L. R. Binford, ‘Archaeology as Anthropology’, American Antiquity, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 217–225, 1962.
[14]
S. R. Binford and L. R. Binford, ‘Archaeological perspectives’, in New perspectives in archaeology, Chicago: Aldine, 1968, pp. 5–32.
[15]
D. Clarke, ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’, Antiquity, vol. 47, no. 185, pp. 6–18, 1973.
[16]
B. G. Trigger, ‘Current trends in American archaeology’, in Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1978, pp. 2–18.
[17]
L. R. Binford, ‘Behavioral Archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise”’, Journal of Anthropological Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 195–208, 1981.
[18]
M. B. Schiffer, ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’, American Antiquity, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 156–165, 1972.
[19]
M. Shott, ‘Status and role of formation theory in contemporary archaeological practice’, Journal of archaeological research, vol. 6, pp. 299–329.
[20]
D. Clarke, ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’, Antiquity, vol. 47, no. 185, pp. 6–18 [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9413911&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0003598X0003461X
[21]
I. Hodder, ‘Post-processual archaeology’, in Advances in archaeological method and theory: v.8, London: Academic Press, 1985, pp. 1–26.
[22]
L. Patrik, ‘Is there an archaeological record?’, in Advances in archaeological method and theory: v.8, London: Academic Press, 1985, pp. 27–62.
[23]
M. Shanks and C. Tilley, ‘Archaeology into the 1990s’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1989, doi: 10.1080/00293652.1989.9965480.
[24]
M. Johnson, ‘Ch. 7: Postprocessual and interpretative archaeologies’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, pp. 98–115.
[25]
R. C. Dunnell, ‘The concept of progress in cultural evolution’, in Evolutionary progress, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988, pp. 169–194.
[26]
T. K. Earle, ‘Political domination and social evolution’, in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology, [New ed.]., vol. Routledge world reference, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 940–961.
[27]
K. V. Flannery, ‘The cultural evolution of civilizations’, Annual review of ecology and systematics, vol. 3, pp. 339–426.
[28]
N. Yoffee, Too many chiefs? (Or safe texts for the 1990s), vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 60–78.
[29]
A. Gardner, ‘Agency’, in Handbook of archaeological theories, Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 95–108.
[30]
M. P. Leone, ‘Toward a Critical Archaeology’, Current Anthropology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 283–302, 1987.
[31]
D. Miller and C. Tilley, ‘Ideology, power and prehistory: an introduction’, in Ideology, power and prehistory, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 1–15 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/ideology-power-and-prehistory/487F9B328580F351C6B97FA48110BB97
[32]
B. G. Trigger, ‘Marxism in contemporary western archaeology’, in Archaeological method and theory v.5, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1993, pp. 159–200.
[33]
I. Hodder, ‘Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view’, in Theory and practice in archaeology, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 92–121 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=de8a3e97-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[34]
C. Tilley, ‘Interpreting material culture’, in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression, vol. One world archaeology, London: Routledge, 1989, pp. 185–194.
[35]
R. Preucel and A. Bauer, ‘Archaeological pragmatics’, Norwegian archaeological review, vol. 34, pp. 85–96.
[36]
J. Robb, ‘The archaeology of symbols.’, Annual review of anthropology, vol. 27, pp. 329–346.
[37]
I. Hodder, ‘Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role’, American Antiquity, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 7–18, 1991.
[38]
M. Johnson, ‘Postprocessual and interpretative archaeologies’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, pp. 98–115.
[39]
C. Renfrew, ‘Towards a cognitive archaeology’, in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 3–12.
[40]
E. Brumfiel, ‘Distinguished lecture in archaeology: breaking and entering the ecosystem – gender, class and faction steal the show’, American anthropologist, vol. 94, pp. 551–567.
[41]
Trigger, Bruce G., A history of archaeological thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[42]
M. Hegmon, ‘Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’, American Antiquity, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 213–243, 2003.
[43]
I. Hodder, ‘Introduction: contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology’, in Archaeological theory today, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Polity, 2012, pp. 1–13.
[44]
R. Preucel and S. Mrozowski, ‘Introduction’, in Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism, 2nd ed., Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 3–49.