1
Alina Alexandra Payne. Introduction. In: Payne AA, ed. Vision and its instruments: art, science, and technology in early modern Europe. University Park, Pennsylvania: : The Pennsylvania State University Press 2015. 1–9.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5bc338be-ff78-e711-80cb-005056af4099
2
Smith PH. Art, Science, and Visual Culture in Early Modern Europe. Isis 2006;97:83–100. doi:10.1086/501102
3
Eisenstein EL. Defining the initial shift; some features of print culture. In: The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1980. 43–160. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107049963.004
4
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe, Vol.1. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1979.
5
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe, Vol.2. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1979.
6
Ackerman JS. Early Renaissance ‘Naturalism’ and Scientific Illustration. In: Distance points: essays in theory and Renaissance art and architecture. Cambridge, MA: : M.I.T. Press 1991. 185–207.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=74c022ee-1b92-ef11-9c35-d5fd3d126a5e
7
Sachiko Kusukawa. Leonhart Fuchs on the Importance of Pictures. Journal of the History of Ideas 1997;58. doi:10.2307/3653907
8
Karen Reeds. Leonardo da Vinci and botanical illustration: nature prints, drawings, and woodcuts ca 1500. In: Visualizing medieval medicine and natural history, 1200-1550. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2006. 205–37.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=989b2279-7f89-e711-80cb-005056af4099
9
Ivins, William Mills. The Road Block Broken: The Fifteenth Century. In: Prints and visual communication.21–50.https://www.fulcrum.org/epubs/8w32r584h#/6/102[xhtml00000051]!/4/1:0
10
William, Mills. Ivins Jr. The Road Block Broken-The Fifeteenth Century. In: Prints and visual communication. Cambridge, Mass: : M.I.T. Press 1978. 21–50.
11
Peter Parshall. Imago Contrafacta: Images and Facts in the Northern Renaissance. Art History 1993;16:554–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.1993.tb00546.x
12
David, Landau & Peter W. Parshall. Printed Herbals and Descriptive Botany. In: The Renaissance print, 1470-1550. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1994. 245–59.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=964a7659-fd78-e711-80cb-005056af4099
13
Carlino A. Representations: An Iconographic investigation of the dissection scene. In: Books of the body: anatomical ritual and renaissance learning. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 1999. 8–68.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d02ff6cb-f087-ef11-9c35-d5fd3d126a5e
14
Katherine, Rowe. ‘Gods handy worke’ Divine Complicity and the Anatomist’s Touch. In: The Body in Parts : Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe. Taylor and Francis 2013. 285–309.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/reader.action?docID=1111756&ppg=5
15
Park K. The Empire of Anatomy. In: Secrets of women: gender, generation, and the origins of human dissection. New York: : Zone 2006. 207–59.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=adbd2beb-f799-e711-80cb-005056af4099
16
Glenn Harcourt. Andreas Vesalius and the Anatomy of Antique Sculpture. Representations 1987;:28–61. doi:10.2307/3043792
17
Bette, Talvacchia. Mythology, Sexuality and Science in Charles Estienne’s Manual of Anatomy. In: Taking positions: on the erotic in Renaissance culture. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1999. 161–87.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a91918ae-b6fa-e711-80cd-005056af4099
18
Wilson B. From Myth to Metropole: Sixteenth-Century Maps of Venice. In: The world in Venice: print, the city and early modern identity. Toronto: : University of Toronto Press 2005. 23–69.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6bc1f26f-0079-e711-80cb-005056af4099
19
Lucia, Nuti. The Perspective Plan in the Sixteenth Century: The Invention of a Representational Language. The Art Bulletin 1994;76:105–28. doi:10.2307/3046005
20
Elke Anna Werner. Anthropomorphic Maps: On the Aesthetic Form and Political Function of Body Metaphors. In: Melion W, ed. The Anthropomorphic Lens: Anthropomorphism, Microcosmism and Analogy in Early Modern Thought and Visual Arts. Leiden ; Boston: : Brill 2014. 251–72. doi:10.1163/9789004275034_012
21
Traub V. Mapping the Global Body. In: Early modern visual culture: representation, race, and empire in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2000. 44–97.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0664e3b1-f999-e711-80cb-005056af4099
22
Valerie Traub. The Nature of Norms in Early Modern England: Anatomy, Cartography, ‘King Lear’. South Central Review 2009;26:42–81.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40211291?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
23
Gaudio M. Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography. In: Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2008. 1–44.https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttts63r.5
24
Gaudio M. Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography. In: Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2008. 1–43.https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttts63r
25
San Juan RM. The Anthropomorphic Image: Negotiations of Space Between Body and Landscape. In: Vertiginous mirrors: the animation of the visual image and early modern travel. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2011. 56–85.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=81cf4fb6-862e-e811-80cd-005056af4099
26
Rublack U. Nationhood. In: Dressing up: cultural identity in Renaissance Europe. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. 125–76.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1850b754-f678-e711-80cb-005056af4099
27
Jill Burke. Nakedness and Other Peoples: Rethinking the Italian Renaissance Nude. Art History 2013;36:714–39. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.12029
28
Rosenthal MF. Fashions of Friendship in an Early Modern Illustrated Album Amicorum: British Library, MS Egerton 1191. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 2009;39:619–41. doi:10.1215/10829636-2009-007
29
Huisman T. The finger of God: anatomical practice in 17th-century Leiden. Leiden: : Primavera Pers 2009.
30
Findlen P. Anatomy Theaters, Botanical Gardens, and Natural History Collections. In: Park K, Daston L, eds. The Cambridge History of Science. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. 272–89. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521572446.013
31
Claudia, Swan. From Blowfish to Flower Still Life Painting. Classification and Its Images circa 1600. In: Merchants & marvels: commerce, science and art in early modern Europe. New York: : Routledge 2002. 109–36.
32
James Elkins. Demonstration, Play, Arcanum. In: The poetics of perspective. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1994. 117–80.
33
Margaret Iversen. The Discourse of Perspective in the Twentieth Century: Panofsky, Damisch, Lacan. Oxford Art Journal 2005;28:193–202.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4500016?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
34
Kenaan H. The ‘Unusual Character’ of Holbein’s “Ambassadors”. Artibus et Historiae 2002;23:61–75. doi:10.2307/1483697
35
Jacques, Lacan. Anamorphosis. In: The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. London: : Vintage 1998. 79–90.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0b6f5164-b4fa-e711-80cd-005056af4099
36
Massey L. Picturing space, displacing bodies: anamorphosis in early modern theories of perspective. University Park, Pa: : Pennsylvania State University Press 2007.
37
Svetlana, Alpers. ‘Ut Pictura, ita visio’: Kepler’s model of the Eye and the Nature of Picturing in the North. In: The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1983. 26–71.
38
Svetlana, Alpers. The Mapping Impulse in Dutch Art. In: The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1983. 119–68.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3432d9ac-abfa-e711-80cd-005056af4099
39
Hanneke, Grootenboer. The Rhetoric of Perspective. In: The rhetoric of perspective: realism and illusionism in seventeenth-century Dutch still-life painting. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2005. 97–135.
40
Victor Ieronim, Stoichiță, et al. Paintings, maps and mirrors. In: Pericolo L, ed. The self-aware image: an insight into early modern metapainting. London: : Harvey Miller Publishers 2015. 151–97.
41
Genevieve Warwick. Looking in the Mirror of Renaissance Art. Art History 2016;39:254–81. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.12237
42
Louis Marin, Mette Hjort. The Medusa Head as Historical Painting. In: To destroy painting. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1995. 136–64.
43
Stuart, Clark. Introduction. In: Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. 1–8.
44
Stuart, Clark. Species, visions and values. In: Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. 9–38.
45
Vincent Ilardi. Eyeglasses and Concave Lenses in Fifteenth-Century Florence and Milan: New Documents. Renaissance Quarterly 1976;29:341–60.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2860275?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
46
Karr Schmidt S. Handling Religion. In: Interactive and Sculptural Printmaking in the Renaissance. Brill 2017. 23–55. doi:10.1163/9789004354135_003
47
Koerner JL. Not Made by Human Hands. In: The moment of self-portraiture in German Renaissance art. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1993. 80–127.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6f4251c2-0279-e711-80cb-005056af4099
48
Pon L. Imprint: Paper, Print, and Matrix. In: A Printed Icon in Early Modern Italy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015. 39–80. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316162293.003
49
Whitney Ann Trettein. Circuit-Bending History: Sketches toward a Digital Schematic. In: Between humanities and the digital. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : MIT Press 2015. 181–92.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7120878
50
Paul Dyck, Ryan Rempel & Stuart Williams. Digitizing Collection, Composition, and Product: Tracking the Work of Little Gidding. In: Nelson B, Terras MM, eds. Digitizing medieval and early modern material culture. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: : Iter in collaboration with ACMRS 2012. 229–56.
51
William H, Sherman. Afterword: The Future of Past Readers. In: Used books: marking readers in Renaissance England. Philadelphia, Pa: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2008. 179–82.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f1de2fce-bc10-e811-80cd-005056af4099