1.
Alina Alexandra Payne. Introduction. In: Payne AA, editor. Vision and its instruments: art, science, and technology in early modern Europe [Internet]. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 2015. p. 1–9. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5bc338be-ff78-e711-80cb-005056af4099
2.
Smith PH. Art, Science, and Visual Culture in Early Modern Europe. Isis. 2006 Mar;97(1):83–100.
3.
Eisenstein EL. Defining the initial shift; some features of print culture. In: The Printing Press as an Agent of Change [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980. p. 43–160. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9781107049963A009/type/book_part
4.
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe, Vol.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979.
5.
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe, Vol.2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979.
6.
Ackerman JS. Early Renaissance ‘Naturalism’ and Scientific Illustration. In: Distance points: essays in theory and Renaissance art and architecture [Internet]. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press; 1991. p. 185–207. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=74c022ee-1b92-ef11-9c35-d5fd3d126a5e
7.
Sachiko Kusukawa. Leonhart Fuchs on the Importance of Pictures. Journal of the History of Ideas. 1997;58(3).
8.
Karen Reeds. Leonardo da Vinci and botanical illustration: nature prints, drawings, and woodcuts ca 1500. In: Visualizing medieval medicine and natural history, 1200-1550 [Internet]. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006. p. 205–37. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=989b2279-7f89-e711-80cb-005056af4099
9.
Ivins, William Mills. The Road Block Broken: The Fifteenth Century. In: Prints and visual communication [Internet]. p. 21–50. Available from: https://www.fulcrum.org/epubs/8w32r584h#/6/102[xhtml00000051]!/4/1:0
10.
William, Mills. Ivins Jr. The Road Block Broken-The Fifeteenth Century. In: Prints and visual communication. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press; 1978. p. 21–50.
11.
Peter Parshall. Imago Contrafacta: Images and Facts in the Northern Renaissance. Art History. 1993;16(4):554–79.
12.
David, Landau & Peter W. Parshall. Printed Herbals and Descriptive Botany. In: The Renaissance print, 1470-1550 [Internet]. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1994. p. 245–59. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=964a7659-fd78-e711-80cb-005056af4099
13.
Carlino A. Representations: An Iconographic investigation of the dissection scene. In: Books of the body: anatomical ritual and renaissance learning [Internet]. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1999. p. 8–68. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d02ff6cb-f087-ef11-9c35-d5fd3d126a5e
14.
Katherine, Rowe. ‘Gods handy worke’ Divine Complicity and the Anatomist’s Touch. In: The Body in Parts : Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe [Internet]. Taylor and Francis; 2013. p. 285–309. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/reader.action?docID=1111756&ppg=5
15.
Park K. The Empire of Anatomy. In: Secrets of women: gender, generation, and the origins of human dissection [Internet]. New York: Zone; 2006. p. 207–59. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=adbd2beb-f799-e711-80cb-005056af4099
16.
Glenn Harcourt. Andreas Vesalius and the Anatomy of Antique Sculpture. Representations [Internet]. 1987;(17):28–61. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3043792#page_scan_tab_contents
17.
Bette, Talvacchia. Mythology, Sexuality and Science in Charles Estienne’s Manual of Anatomy. In: Taking positions: on the erotic in Renaissance culture [Internet]. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press; 1999. p. 161–87. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a91918ae-b6fa-e711-80cd-005056af4099
18.
Wilson B. From Myth to Metropole: Sixteenth-Century Maps of Venice. In: The world in Venice: print, the city and early modern identity [Internet]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2005. p. 23–69. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6bc1f26f-0079-e711-80cb-005056af4099
19.
Lucia, Nuti. The Perspective Plan in the Sixteenth Century: The Invention of a Representational Language. The Art Bulletin. 1994;76(1):105–28.
20.
Elke Anna Werner. Anthropomorphic Maps: On the Aesthetic Form and Political Function of Body Metaphors. In: Melion W, editor. The Anthropomorphic Lens: Anthropomorphism, Microcosmism and Analogy in Early Modern Thought and Visual Arts [Internet]. Leiden ; Boston: Brill; 2014. p. 251–72. Available from: https://brill.com/view/title/24727
21.
Traub V. Mapping the Global Body. In: Early modern visual culture: representation, race, and empire in Renaissance England [Internet]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2000. p. 44–97. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0664e3b1-f999-e711-80cb-005056af4099
22.
Valerie Traub. The Nature of Norms in Early Modern England: Anatomy, Cartography, ‘King Lear’. South Central Review [Internet]. 2009;26(1):42–81. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40211291?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
23.
Gaudio M. Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography. In: Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2008. p. 1–44. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttts63r.5
24.
Gaudio M. Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography. In: Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2008. p. 1–43. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttts63r
25.
San Juan RM. The Anthropomorphic Image: Negotiations of Space Between Body and Landscape. In: Vertiginous mirrors: the animation of the visual image and early modern travel [Internet]. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2011. p. 56–85. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=81cf4fb6-862e-e811-80cd-005056af4099
26.
Rublack U. Nationhood. In: Dressing up: cultural identity in Renaissance Europe [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 125–76. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1850b754-f678-e711-80cb-005056af4099
27.
Jill Burke. Nakedness and Other Peoples: Rethinking the Italian Renaissance Nude. Art History. 2013;36(4):714–39.
28.
Rosenthal MF. Fashions of Friendship in an Early Modern Illustrated Album Amicorum: British Library, MS Egerton 1191. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies. 2009;39(3):619–41.
29.
Huisman T. The finger of God: anatomical practice in 17th-century Leiden. Leiden: Primavera Pers; 2009.
30.
Findlen P. Anatomy Theaters, Botanical Gardens, and Natural History Collections. In: Park K, Daston L, editors. The Cambridge History of Science [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 272–89. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/histories/CBO9781139054010A018
31.
Claudia, Swan. From Blowfish to Flower Still Life Painting. Classification and Its Images circa 1600. In: Merchants & marvels: commerce, science and art in early modern Europe. New York: Routledge; 2002. p. 109–36.
32.
James Elkins. Demonstration, Play, Arcanum. In: The poetics of perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1994. p. 117–80.
33.
Margaret Iversen. The Discourse of Perspective in the Twentieth Century: Panofsky, Damisch, Lacan. Oxford Art Journal [Internet]. 2005;28(2):193–202. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4500016?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
34.
Kenaan H. The ‘Unusual Character’ of Holbein’s “Ambassadors”. Artibus et Historiae. 2002;23(46):61–75.
35.
Jacques, Lacan. Anamorphosis. In: The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis [Internet]. London: Vintage; 1998. p. 79–90. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0b6f5164-b4fa-e711-80cd-005056af4099
36.
Massey L. Picturing space, displacing bodies: anamorphosis in early modern theories of perspective. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2007.
37.
Svetlana, Alpers. ‘Ut Pictura, ita visio’: Kepler’s model of the Eye and the Nature of Picturing in the North. In: The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1983. p. 26–71.
38.
Svetlana, Alpers. The Mapping Impulse in Dutch Art. In: The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1983. p. 119–68. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3432d9ac-abfa-e711-80cd-005056af4099
39.
Hanneke, Grootenboer. The Rhetoric of Perspective. In: The rhetoric of perspective: realism and illusionism in seventeenth-century Dutch still-life painting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005. p. 97–135.
40.
Victor Ieronim, Stoichiță, et al. Paintings, maps and mirrors. In: Pericolo L, editor. The self-aware image: an insight into early modern metapainting. New, improved, and updated edition. London: Harvey Miller Publishers; 2015. p. 151–97.
41.
Genevieve Warwick. Looking in the Mirror of Renaissance Art. Art History. 2016;39(2):254–81.
42.
Louis Marin, Mette Hjort. The Medusa Head as Historical Painting. In: To destroy painting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1995. p. 136–64.
43.
Stuart, Clark. Introduction. In: Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 1–8.
44.
Stuart, Clark. Species, visions and values. In: Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 9–38.
45.
Vincent Ilardi. Eyeglasses and Concave Lenses in Fifteenth-Century Florence and Milan: New Documents. Renaissance Quarterly [Internet]. 1976 Oct;29(3):341–60. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2860275?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
46.
Karr Schmidt S. Handling Religion. In: Interactive and Sculptural Printmaking in the Renaissance [Internet]. Brill; 2017. p. 23–55. Available from: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/books/b9789004354135_003
47.
Koerner JL. Not Made by Human Hands. In: The moment of self-portraiture in German Renaissance art [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993. p. 80–127. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6f4251c2-0279-e711-80cb-005056af4099
48.
Pon L. Imprint: Paper, Print, and Matrix. In: A Printed Icon in Early Modern Italy [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p. 39–80. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316162293A011
49.
Whitney Ann Trettein. Circuit-Bending History: Sketches toward a Digital Schematic. In: Between humanities and the digital [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2015. p. 181–92. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7120878
50.
Paul Dyck, Ryan Rempel & Stuart Williams. Digitizing Collection, Composition, and Product: Tracking the Work of Little Gidding. In: Nelson B, Terras MM, editors. Digitizing medieval and early modern material culture. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Iter in collaboration with ACMRS; 2012. p. 229–56.
51.
William H, Sherman. Afterword: The Future of Past Readers. In: Used books: marking readers in Renaissance England [Internet]. Philadelphia, Pa: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2008. p. 179–82. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f1de2fce-bc10-e811-80cd-005056af4099