» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five Recent Play Dates - EASST. https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/.
Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/Is the World in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data.
Adams, Vincanne. Metrics. Duke University Press, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374480.
After Kinship by Janet Carsten. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.
After Kinship by Janet Carsten. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.
Amoore, L. ‘Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times’. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 28, no. 6, Nov. 2011, pp. 24–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417430.
Amoore, Louise. ‘Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror’. Political Geography, vol. 25, no. 3, Mar. 2006, pp. 336–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001.
Anderson, Ken, et al. ‘Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining’. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, vol. 2009, no. 1, Aug. 2009, pp. 123–40, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x.
Anna Tsing. ‘The Global Situation’. Cultural Anthropology, vol. 15, no. 3, 2000, pp. 327–60, http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Annelise Riles. ‘Infinity within the Brackets’. American Ethnologist, vol. 25, no. 3, 1998, pp. 378–98, http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
———. ‘Infinity within the Brackets’. American Ethnologist, vol. 25, no. 3, 1998, pp. 378–98, http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Annette B. Weiner. ‘Inalienable Wealth’. American Ethnologist, vol. 12, no. 2, 1985, pp. 210–27, http://www.jstor.org/stable/644217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Arturo Escobar. ‘After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology’. Current Anthropology, vol. 40, no. 1, 1999, pp. 1–30, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Asdal, Kristin. ‘Enacting Things through Numbers: Taking Nature into Account/Ing’. Geoforum, vol. 39, no. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 123–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004.
Beaulieu, Anne. ‘From Brainbank to Database: The Informational Turn in the Study of the Brain’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, June 2004, pp. 367–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011.
Beer, D., and R. Burrows. ‘Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data’. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 4, July 2013, pp. 47–71, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413476542.
Beer, David. ‘How Should We Do the History of Big Data?’ Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 1, Jan. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716646135.
———. ‘Productive Measures: Culture and Measurement in the Context of Everyday Neoliberalism’. Big Data & Society, vol. 2, no. 1, June 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715578951.
Biagioli, M. ‘Rights or Rewards? Changing Frameworks of Scientific Authorship’. Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, Routledge, 2013, pp. 253–81, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203954270.
Biagioli, Mario. ‘Between Knowledge And Technology: Patenting Methods, Rethinking Materiality’. Anthropological Forum, vol. 22, no. 3, Nov. 2012, pp. 285–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.724009.
Birchall, Clare. ‘Shareveillance: Subjectivity between Open and Closed Data’. Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663965.
Blok, A., and M. A. Pedersen. ‘Complementary Social Science? Quali-Quantitative Experiments in a Big Data World’. Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, July 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714543908.
Boellstorff, T. ‘Rethinking Digital Anthropology’. Digital Anthropology, Berg, 2012, https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922.
Boellstorff, Tom, and Bill Maurer, editors. ‘Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data’,. Data, Now Bigger and Better!, Paradigm, Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015.
Boellstorff, Tom, and Bill Maurer, editors. ‘Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra’. Data, Now Bigger and Better!, Paradigm, Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015.
Bowker, G. ‘Databasing the World: Biodiversity and the 2000s’. Memory Practices in the Sciences, Inside technology, MIT Press, 2005, pp. 107–36, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4bbefe35-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Bowker, Geoffrey C. ‘The Theory/Data Thing’. International Journal of Communication, vol. 8, 2014, http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190.
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press, 1999, http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out.
boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford. ‘CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA’. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 15, no. 5, June 2012, pp. 662–79, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
Breiger, R. L. ‘Scaling Down’. Big Data & Society, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602497.
Brine, Kevin R., and Mary Poovey. ‘From Measuring Desire to Quantifying Expectations: A Late Nineteenth- Century Effort to Marry Economic Theory and Data’. ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron, Infrastructures series, MIT Press, 2013, https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327.
Brown, D., and G. Nicholas. ‘Protecting Indigenous Cultural Property in the Age of Digital Democracy: Institutional and Communal Responses to Canadian First Nations and Maori Heritage Concerns’. Journal of Material Culture, vol. 17, no. 3, Sept. 2012, pp. 307–24, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183512454065.
Browne, Simone. Dark Matters. Duke University Press, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375302?locatt=mode:legacy.
Büscher, Bram. ‘Nature 2.0’. Geoforum, vol. 44, Jan. 2013, pp. 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.08.004.
———. ‘Nature 2.0: Exploring and Theorizing the Links between New Media and Nature Conservation’. New Media & Society, vol. 18, no. 5, May 2016, pp. 726–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814545841.
Candea, Matei. ‘Arbitrary Locations: In Defence of the Bounded Field-Site’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 13, no. 1, Mar. 2007, pp. 167–84, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x.
Cheney-Lippold, John. ‘A New Algorithmic Identity’. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 28, no. 6, Nov. 2011, pp. 164–81, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411424420.
Chua, L., and A. Salmond. ‘Artefacts in Anthropology’. The SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology, SAGE, 2012, pp. 101–14, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=11445b7c-8636-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. ‘The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory’. Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 1, Sept. 2008, pp. 148–71, https://doi.org/10.1086/595632.
Coopmans, Catelijne. ‘Visual Analytics as Artful Revelation’. Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited, edited by Catelijne Coopmans, Inside technology, The MIT Press, 2014, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Couldry, N., and A. Powell. ‘Big Data from the Bottom Up’. Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, July 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277.
D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, Kevin. ‘The Surveillant Assemblage’. British Journal of Sociology, vol. 51, no. 4, Dec. 2000, pp. 605–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280.
D. Miller. ‘Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities’. The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture, School of American Research advanced seminar series, School of American Research Press, 2001.
Dalsgaard, Steffen. ‘The Commensurability of Carbon’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, June 2013, pp. 80–98, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.1.006.
Dalsgaard, Steffen, and Morten Nielsen. ‘Introduction: Time and the Field’. Social Analysis, vol. 57, no. 1, Mar. 2013, pp. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2013.570101.
Dawn Nafus. ‘Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’. International Journal of Communication, vol. 8, 2014, http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170.
Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: A Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4. http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology.
Elizabeth A. Povinelli. ‘The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives’. Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies, vol. 22, no. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 146–71, https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1218274.
Emily Martin. ‘The End of the Body?’ American Ethnologist, vol. 19, no. 1, 1992, pp. 121–40, http://www.jstor.org/stable/644828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Evelyn Ruppert. ‘Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects’. Sociology, vol. 45, no. 2, 2011, pp. 218–33, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Fairhead, James, et al. ‘Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature?’ Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 39, no. 2, Apr. 2012, pp. 237–61, https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.
Faubion, James D., and George E. Marcus. Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition. Cornell University Press, 2009.
Floridi, Luciano. ‘A Look into the Future Impact of ICT on Our Lives’. The Information Society, vol. 23, no. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 59–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240601059094.
Ford, H. ‘Big Data and Small: Collaborations between Ethnographers and Data Scientists’. Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, July 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714544337.
Fortun, Kim, et al. ‘Pushback: Critical Data Designers and Pollution Politics’. Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716668903.
Franklin, S. ‘Biologization Re-Visited: Kinship Theory’. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, Duke University Press, 2001, pp. 302–25, https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0.
———. ‘Re-Thinking Nature-Culture: Anthropology and the New Genetics’. Anthropological Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, Mar. 2003, pp. 65–85, https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499603003001752.
Fujimara, J. ‘The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics’. The Practices of Human Genetics, Sociology of the sciences, Kluwer Academic, 1999, pp. 49–87.
Fuller, M., and A. Goffey. ‘Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction’. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, nos 4–5, July 2012, pp. 311–33, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412450466.
Fuller, M, and A. Goffey. ‘Leak Early, Leak Often’. Evil Media, The MIT Press, 2012, pp. 100–04, https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.
Gabrys, Jennifer, et al. ‘Just Good Enough Data: Figuring Data Citizenships through Air Pollution Sensing and Data Stories’. Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677.
———. Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. University of Minnesota Press, 2016, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq.
Garnett, Emma. ‘Developing a Feeling for Error: Practices of Monitoring and Modelling Air Pollution Data’. Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716658061.
Geismar, Haidy, and William Mohns. ‘Social Relationships and Digital Relationships: Rethinking the Database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, May 2011, pp. S133–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x.
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro. ‘The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition’. Cultural Anthropology, vol. 23, no. 1, 2008, pp. 1–14, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Gerlitz, Carolin, and Celia Lury. ‘Social Media and Self-Evaluating Assemblages: On Numbers, Orderings and Values’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, May 2014, pp. 174–88, https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267.
Gilles Deleuze. ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’. October, vol. 59, 1992, pp. 3–7, http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Gitelman, Lisa. ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron. MIT Press, 2013, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327.
Grebowicz, Margret. ‘Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The Social Effects of Climate Change as Internet Spectacle’. Environmental Humanities, vol. 5, 2014, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615388.
Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life’ Ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.
Gregg, M. ‘The Gift That Is Not Given’. Data, Now Bigger and Better!, edited by Tom Boellstorff and Bill Maurer, Paradigm, Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015.
Gregory, C. A. Gifts and Commodities. Academic Press, 1982.
Gross, Ana. ‘The Economy of Social Data: Exploring Research Ethics as Device’. The Sociological Review, vol. 59, Dec. 2011, pp. 113–29, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x.
Hacking, I. ‘The Argument’. The Taming of Chance, Ideas in Context, Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 1–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766.
Halpern, Orit. Beautiful Data. Duke University Press, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376323-010.
———. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Duke University Press, 2014.
———. ‘Cybernetic Rationality’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, May 2014, pp. 223–38, https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320.
Haraway, D. ‘Chapter 4: Gene’. Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience, Routledge, 1997.
Harvey, P. ‘The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach’. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, nos 4–5, July 2012, pp. 76–92, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412448827.
Helmond, Anne. ‘“Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron’. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 17, no. 9, Oct. 2014, pp. 1171–73, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.920042.
Helmreich, S. ‘Kinship in Hypertext’. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, Duke University Press, 2002, pp. 116–43, http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222.
Helmreich, Stefan. ‘Blue-Green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy’. BioSocieties, vol. 2, no. 3, Sept. 2007, pp. 287–302, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005753.
Hilgartner, Stephen. ‘Selective Flows of Knowledge in Technoscientific Interaction: Information Control in Genome Research’. The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 45, no. 02, June 2012, pp. 267–80, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087412000106.
Hirsch, Eric, and Marilyn Strathern. Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. Berghahn Books, 2004, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk.
Hogan, Mél. ‘Data Flows and Water Woes: The Utah Data Center’. Big Data & Society, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715592429.
Hui, Yuk. ‘What Is a Digital Object?’ Metaphilosophy, vol. 43, no. 4, July 2012, pp. 380–95, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x.
Igoe, J. ‘The Spectacle of Nature in the Global Economy of Appearances: Anthropological Engagements with the Spectacular Mediations of Transnational Conservation’. Critique of Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 4, Dec. 2010, pp. 375–97, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10372468.
Isin, E and Ruppert E (2017) Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 11 843-857. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934.
Isin, E and Ruppert E (2017) Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 11 843-857. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934.
J. Holt, and Patrick Vondereau. ‘Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure’. Traffic Signal Timing Manual, no. FHWA-HOP-08-024, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2014, http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024.
Jackson Jr., John L. ‘Ethnography Is, Ethnography Ain’t’. Cultural Anthropology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 480–97, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01155.x.
Jensen, Casper Bruun, and Atsuro Morita. ‘Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments’. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, vol. 1, Nov. 2015, pp. 81–87, http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21.
JIMÉNEZ, ALBERTO CORSÍN. ‘Relations and Disproportions: The Labor of Scholarship in the Knowledge Economy’. American Ethnologist, vol. 35, no. 2, May 2008, pp. 229–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00035.x.
John, Nicholas A. ‘Sharing and Web 2.0: The Emergence of a Keyword’. New Media & Society, vol. 15, no. 2, Mar. 2013, pp. 167–82, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450684.
Kaufmann, M. ‘Resilience 2.0: Social Media Use and (Self-)Care during the 2011 Norway Attacks’. Media, Culture & Society, vol. 37, no. 7, Oct. 2015, pp. 972–87, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715584101.
Kelty, Christopher, et al. ‘Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection’. Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online, 13 Dec. 2012, http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection.
Kelty, Christopher M. ‘This Is Not an Article: Model Organism Newsletters and the Question of “Open Science”’. BioSocieties, vol. 7, no. 2, June 2012, pp. 140–68, https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2012.8.
Kim Fortun. ‘From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective’. Osiris, vol. 19, 2004, pp. 283–96, http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon. ‘Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0.’ Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949.
Kitchin, R. ‘Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts’. Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, Apr. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.
Knox, H. ‘Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil’. Subterranean Estates: Life Worlds of Oil and Gas, edited by Hannah Appel et al., Cornell University Press, 2015, https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0.
Laidlaw, James. ‘A Free Gift Makes No Friends’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 6, no. 4, Dec. 2000, pp. 617–34, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00036.
Lake, Robert W. ‘Big Data, Urban Governance, and the Ontological Politics of Hyperindividualism’. Big Data & Society, vol. 4, no. 1, June 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716682537.
Lash, S. ‘Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation?’ Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 24, no. 3, May 2007, pp. 55–78, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075956.
Latour, B. ‘Circulating Reference’. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 24–79, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3281174a-6036-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Latour, Bruno, et al. ‘“The Whole Is Always Smaller than Its Parts” - a Digital Test of Gabriel Tardes’ Monads’. The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 63, no. 4, Dec. 2012, pp. 590–615, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x.
Leach, James. ‘The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration’. Social Analysis, vol. 55, no. 3, Jan. 2011, https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2011.550308.
Lehning, M., et al. ‘Instrumenting the Earth: Next-Generation Sensor Networks and Environmental Science’. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery, Microsoft Research, pp. 45–51.
Leonelli, S. ‘Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology’. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 33, nos 1–2, Feb. 2013, pp. 6–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467613496768.
Lezaun, J., and C. M. Montgomery. ‘The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development’. Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 40, no. 1, Jan. 2015, pp. 3–29, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914542349.
Lippert, Ingmar. ‘Environment as Datascape: Enacting Emission Realities in Corporate Carbon Accounting’. Geoforum, vol. 66, Nov. 2015, pp. 126–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009.
Lupton, Deborah. ‘Quantifying the Body: Monitoring and Measuring Health in the Age of mHealth Technologies’. Critical Public Health, vol. 23, no. 4, Dec. 2013, pp. 393–403, https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931.
———. ‘Self-Tracking Modes: Relflexive Self-Monitoring and Data Practices’. Social Life of Big Data Symposium 2nd June 2015, School of Communications and Arts, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549.
———. ‘The Commodification of Patient Opinion: The Digital Patient Experience Economy in the Age of Big Data’. Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 36, no. 6, July 2014, pp. 856–69, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12109.
LYON, DAVID. ‘BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE’. Bioethics, vol. 22, no. 9, Nov. 2008, pp. 499–508, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.
Lyon, David. ‘Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance’. Bioethics, vol. 22, no. 9, Nov. 2008, pp. 499–508, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.
———. ‘Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1’. International Political Sociology, vol. 4, no. 4, Dec. 2010, pp. 325–38, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x.
———. ‘Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique’. Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, July 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861.
Mackenzie, Adrian. ‘Multiplying Numbers Differently: An Epidemiology of Contagious Convolution’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, May 2014, pp. 189–207, https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110.
———. ‘These Things Called Systems’. Social Studies of Science, vol. 33, no. 3, June 2003, pp. 365–87, https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333003.
Manovich, L. ‘Database as Symbolic Form’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 5, no. 2, June 1999, pp. 80–99, https://doi.org/10.1177/135485659900500206.
Marcus, G. ‘Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue’. Experiments in Holism: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 28–46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426.
Marcus, George E. ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 1, Oct. 1995, pp. 95–117, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.
MARCUS, GEORGE E. ‘THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch’. Cultural Anthropology, vol. 27, no. 3, Aug. 2012, pp. 427–45, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01152.x.
MARILYN STRATHERN. ‘VIRTUAL SOCIETY? GET REAL! Ashridge 4–5 May 2000: Conference of the “Virtual Society?: The Social Science of Electronic Technologies” Programme: Abstraction and Decontextualisation: An Anthropological Comment’. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, vol. 22, no. 1, 2001, pp. 52–66, http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23820353?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Marilyn Strathern. ‘Virtual Society? Get Real! Ashridge 4–5 May 2000: Conference of the “Virtual Society?: The Social Science of Electronic Technologies” Programme: Abstraction and Decontextualisation: An Anthropological Comment’. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, vol. 22, no. 1, 2001, pp. 52–66, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23820353?seq=8#page_scan_tab_contents.
Marr, Bernard. The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data. Data Informed, 21 AD, http://data-informed.com/.
Marres, Noortje, and Esther Weltevrede. ‘Scraping the Social?’ Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 6, no. 3, Aug. 2013, pp. 313–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070.
Maurer, Bill. ‘Late to the Party: Debt and Data’. Social Anthropology, vol. 20, no. 4, Nov. 2012, pp. 474–81, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2012.00219.x.
Maurer, W.M. Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data. Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago, 2015, pp. 67–86, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161.
M’charek, Amade, et al. ‘Topologies of Race’. Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 4, July 2014, pp. 468–87, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913509493.
McNally, Ruth, et al. ‘Understanding the “Intensive” in “Data Intensive Research”: Data Flows in Next Generation Sequencing and Environmental Networked Sensors’. International Journal of Digital Curation, vol. 7, no. 1, Mar. 2012, pp. 81–94, https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.216.
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows. ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’. Sociology, vol. 41, no. 5, 2007, pp. 885–99, http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Nadim, Tahani. ‘Blind Regards: Troubling Data and Their Sentinels’. Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716666301.
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J. This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056.
Nafus, Dawn. ‘Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC’. EPIC, EPICPeople.org, 15 May 2015, https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/.
———. ‘Stuck Data, Dead Data, and Disloyal Data: The Stops and Starts in Making Numbers into Social Practices’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, May 2014, pp. 208–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266.
Porter, Theodore M. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press, 1995.
Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab. http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/.
Rabinow, Paul. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton University Press, 1996.
Rapp, Rayna. ‘Big Data, Small Kids: Medico-Scientific, Familial and Advocacy Visions of Human Brains’. BioSocieties, Oct. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.33.
Richard Maxwell ; Jon Raundand Nina Lager Vestberg. ‘Gabrys, J. (2015) Powering Ecologies: From Energy Ecologies to Electronic Environmentalism’. Media and the Ecological Crisis: Routledge Research in Cultural and Media Studies 67.
Richardson, Sarah S. ; Stevens, Hallam. ‘Fortun, M. (2015) What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics’. Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome, http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=4&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_dawson9780822375449&indx=2&recIds=TN_dawson9780822375449&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=4&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Postgenomics%3A%20Perspectives%20on%20Biology%20After%20the%20Genome&dstmp=1471430773987.
Riles, A. ‘Introduction: In Response’. Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, University of Michigan Press, 2006, pp. 1–38.
Riles, Annelise. The Network inside out: Annelise Riles. University of Michigan Press, 2001.
Roderick, Leanne. ‘Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry’. Critical Sociology, vol. 40, no. 5, Sept. 2014, pp. 729–46, https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501350.
Rosemary J. Coombe and Andrew Herman. ‘Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web’. Anthropological Quarterly, vol. 77, no. 3, 2004, pp. 559–74, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3318236.
Rosenberg, D. ‘Data before the Fact’. ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron, edited by Lisa Gitelman, Infrastructures series, The MIT Press, 2013, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327.
Rubio, Fernando Dominguez, and Patrick Baert, editors. ‘Leach, J. (2012) “Step inside: Knowledge Freely Available”: The Politics of (Making) Knowledge-Objects’.’ The Politics of Knowledge, Routledge, 2012, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386.
Ruckenstein, Minna. ‘Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles’. Societies, vol. 4, no. 1, Feb. 2014, pp. 68–84, https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068.
Ruppert, E., et al. ‘Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices’. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 4, July 2013, pp. 22–46, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941.
———. ‘The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices’. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, nos 4–5, July 2012, pp. 116–36, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412439428.
Ruppert, Evelyn. ‘Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects’. Sociology, vol. 45, no. 2, Apr. 2011, pp. 218–33, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394027.
Ruppert, Evelyn, and Mike Savage. ‘Transactional Politics’. The Sociological Review, vol. 59, Dec. 2011, pp. 73–92, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x.
S. Day, and C. Lury. ‘Biosensing: Tracking Persons.’ Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life, MIT Press, 2016, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.
Sabina Leonelli. ‘What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework’. Philosophy of Science, vol. 82, no. 5, 2015, pp. 810–21, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Salmond, Amiria J. M. ‘Transforming Translations (Part I)’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 3, Dec. 2013, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.002.
Seaver, Nick. ‘Algorithms as Culture: Some Tactics for the Ethnography of Algorithmic Systems’. Big Data & Society, vol. 4, no. 2, Dec. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104.
———. ‘The Nice Thing about Context Is That Everyone Has It’. Media, Culture & Society, vol. 37, no. 7, Oct. 2015, pp. 1101–09, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715594102.
Shackley, S., and B. Wynne. ‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’. Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 21, no. 3, July 1996, pp. 275–302, https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100302.
Sharma, Aradhana, and Akhil Gupta. ‘Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-Thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization’. The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, Blackwell readers in anthropology, Blackwell, 2006.
Sharp, Lesley A. ‘The Commodification of the Body and Its Parts’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 29, no. 1, Oct. 2000, pp. 287–328, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287.
Singer, Natasha. ‘From Knowing Yourself to Prodding Yourself’. The New York Times, Apr. 2015.
Stefan Helmreich. ‘From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures’. Social Research, vol. 78, no. 4, 2011, pp. 1211–42, http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Steinmetz, George. ‘Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn.’ State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn, The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture, Cornell University Press, 1999, https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.
Strathern, M. ‘Environments within: An Ethnographic Commentary on Scale’. Culture, Landscape, and the Environment: The Linacre Lectures, 1997, The Linacre lectures, Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 44–71.
———. ‘On Space and Depth’. Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, Science and cultural theory, Duke University Press, 2002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550. Electronic resource.
Strathern, M. ‘The Limits of Auto-Anthropology’. Anthropology at Home, A.S.A. monographs, Tavistock Publications, 1987, pp. 16–37.
Strathern, M. ‘The Patent and the Malanggan’. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 18, no. 4, Aug. 2001, pp. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051850.
Strathern, Marilyn. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
———. ‘Chapter 1’. Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things, Athlone, 1999.
———. ‘Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources’. Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 111–34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514.
———. ‘Externalities in Comparative Guise’. Economy and Society, vol. 31, no. 2, Jan. 2002, pp. 250–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123153.
———. Partial Connections. Updated ed, AltaMira Press, 2004.
———. ‘Parts and Wholes: Refiguring Relationships in a Post-Plural World’. Conceptualizing Society, Routledge, 1992, pp. 75–106, http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244.
Strathern, Marilyn and University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Prickly Pear Press, 1995.
Striphas, Ted. ‘Algorithmic Culture’. European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 18, nos 4–5, Aug. 2015, pp. 395–412, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392.
Thacker, Eugene. ‘What Is Biomedia?’ Configurations, vol. 11, no. 1, 2003, pp. 47–79, https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2004.0014.
The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete | WIRED. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
The World of Indicators Edited by Richard Rottenburg. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED.
‘To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World’. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, vol. 44, no. 3, May 2015, pp. 436–37, https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306115579192c.
Tsing, Anna. ‘Sorting out Commodities: How Capitalist Value Is Made through Gifts’. HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, 2013, pp. 21–43, https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.
Tutton, Richard, and Barbara Prainsack. ‘Enterprising or Altruistic Selves? Making up Research Subjects in Genetics Research’. Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 33, no. 7, Nov. 2011, pp. 1081–95, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x.
Underberg, Natalie M., and Elayne Zorn. ‘Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography’. Visual Anthropology, vol. 26, no. 1, Jan. 2013, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2013.734760.
Universitetet i Oslo. State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives. Edited by Christian Krohn-Hansen and Knut G. Nustad, Anthropology, culture, and society, Pluto Press, 2005, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7.
Van Dijck, José. ‘Digital Cadavers: The Visible Human Project as Anatomical Theater’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, June 2000, pp. 271–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5.
Van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell. ‘Understanding the Promises and Premises of Online Health Platforms’. Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 1, Jan. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654173.
Velkova, Julia. ‘Data That Warms: Waste Heat, Infrastructural Convergence and the Computation Traffic Commodity’. Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716684144.
Verran, H. ‘Number as Generative Device’. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford, Culture, economy and the social, Routledge, 2014.
Verran, Helen. ‘On Assemblage’. Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 2, nos 1–2, July 2009, pp. 169–82, https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064188.
———. ‘The Changing Lives of Measures and Values: From Centre Stage in the Fading “Disciplinary” Society to Pervasive Background Instrument in the Emergent “Control” Society’. The Sociological Review, vol. 59, no. 2_suppl, Dec. 2011, pp. 60–72, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x.
Vertesi, Janet. ‘My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal.’ Time.Com, 2014, pp. 1–1, https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bsu&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.
Walford, Antonia. ‘Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously’. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 2, Jan. 2012, https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2012.300207.
Weiner, A. B. ‘Inalienable Possessions: The Forgotten Dimension’. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving, University of California Press, 1992, pp. 23–43, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=7cf9c98c-5836-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
———. ‘Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau’. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving, University of California Press, 1992.
Wendy F. Hsu. Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In ‘The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography’ Eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge. 2016, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673974.ch4.
Whitington, Jerome. ‘Carbon as a Metric of the Human’. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, vol. 39, no. 1, May 2016, pp. 46–63, https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12130.
Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium. https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7.