1
D. Beer, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716646135.
2
O. Halpern, Beautiful Data, Duke University Press, 2015.
3
F. D. Rubio and P. Baert, Eds., in The politics of knowledge, Routledge, London, 2012.
4
T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Eds., in Data, now bigger and better!, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2015, vol. Paradigm.
5
Annelise Riles, American Ethnologist, 1998, 25, 378–398.
6
B. Latour, in Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999, pp. 24–79.
7
T. Striphas, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 2015, 18, 395–412.
8
D. Rosenberg, in ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, ed. L. Gitelman, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2013, vol. Infrastructures series.
9
D. Beer, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951715578951.
10
L. Floridi, The Information Society, 2007, 23, 59–64.
11
H. Verran, The Sociological Review, 2011, 59, 60–72.
12
I. Hacking, in The Taming of Chance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, vol. Ideas in Context, pp. 1–10.
13
T. M. Porter, Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, 1995.
14
Y. Hui, Metaphilosophy, 2012, 43, 380–395.
15
O. Halpern, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 223–238.
16
O. Halpern, Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945, Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 2014, vol. Experimental futures.
17
A. Riles, in Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2006, pp. 1–38.
18
L. Chua and A. Salmond, in The SAGE handbook of social anthropology, SAGE, Los Angeles, 2012, pp. 101–114.
19
A. C. JIMÉNEZ, American Ethnologist, 2008, 35, 229–242.
20
L. Gitelman, ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2013, vol. Infrastructures series.
21
L. Manovich, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 1999, 5, 80–99.
22
Elizabeth A. Povinelli, Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies, 2011, 22, 146–171.
23
M. Hogan, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951715592429.
25
H. Geismar and W. Mohns, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2011, 17, S133–S155.
26
J. Velkova, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716684144.
27
G. Bowker, in Memory practices in the sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2005, vol. Inside technology, pp. 107–136.
28
P. Harvey, Theory, Culture & Society, 2012, 29, 76–92.
29
Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 2015, 44, 436–437.
30
G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star, Sorting things out: classification and its consequences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999, vol. Inside technology.
31
J. Holt and Patrick Vondereau, in Traffic signal timing manual, U.S. Department of Transportation, [Washington, D.C.], 2014.
32
A. J. M. Salmond, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, , DOI:10.14318/hau3.3.002.
33
W. H. K. Chun, Critical Inquiry, 2008, 35, 148–171.
34
M. Fuller and A. Goffey, Theory, Culture & Society, 2012, 29, 311–333.
35
D. Haraway, in Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience, Routledge, New York, 1997.
36
H. Verran, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2009, 2, 169–182.
37
A. Mackenzie, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 189–207.
38
M. Strathern and University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology, The relation: issues in complexity and scale, Prickly Pear Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1995, vol. Prickly Pear pamphlet.
39
C. B. Jensen and A. Morita, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2015, 1, 81–87.
40
J. Laidlaw, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2000, 6, 617–634.
41
Tsing, Anna, HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2013, 3, 21–43.
42
N. A. John, New Media & Society, 2013, 15, 167–182.
43
Maurer, W.M., Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago, 2015, pp. 67–86.
44
J. Van Dijck and T. Poell, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716654173.
45
S. Day and C. Lury, in Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life, MIT Press, 2016.
46
After Kinship by Janet Carsten, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.
47
A. B. Weiner, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992.
48
S. Leonelli, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 2013, 33, 6–11.
49
Richardson, Sarah S. ; Stevens, Hallam, in Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome.
50
M. Biagioli, in Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science, Routledge, New York, 2013, pp. 253–281.
51
A. B. Weiner, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992, pp. 23–43.
52
S. Hilgartner, The British Journal for the History of Science, 2012, 45, 267–280.
53
C. M. Kelty, BioSocieties, 2012, 7, 140–168.
54
E. Hirsch and M. Strathern, Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia, Berghahn Books, New York, 2004.
55
J. Leach, Social Analysis, , DOI:10.3167/sa.2011.550308.
56
J. Lezaun and C. M. Montgomery, Science, Technology & Human Values, 2015, 40, 3–29.
57
D. Miller, in The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, N.M., 2001, vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series.
58
M. Gregg, in Data, now bigger and better!, eds. T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2015, vol. Paradigm.
59
S. Dalsgaard and M. Nielsen, Social Analysis, 2013, 57, 1–19.
60
M. Biagioli, Anthropological Forum, 2012, 22, 285–299.
61
M. Strathern, Theory, Culture & Society, 2001, 18, 1–26.
62
D. Brown and G. Nicholas, Journal of Material Culture, 2012, 17, 307–324.
63
C. A. Gregory, Gifts and commodities, Academic Press, London, 1982, vol. Studies in political economy.
64
B. Maurer, Social Anthropology, 2012, 20, 474–481.
65
M. Strathern, Economy and Society, 2002, 31, 250–267.
66
Rosemary J. Coombe and Andrew Herman, Anthropological Quarterly, 2004, 77, 559–574.
67
Annette B. Weiner, American Ethnologist, 1985, 12, 210–227.
68
A. Walford, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, , DOI:10.3167/ca.2012.300207.
69
K. R. Brine and M. Poovey, in ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2013, vol. Infrastructures series.
70
A. Helmond, Information, Communication & Society, 2014, 17, 1171–1173.
71
Arturo Escobar, Current Anthropology, 1999, 40, 1–30.
72
B. Büscher, New Media & Society, 2016, 18, 726–743.
73
K. Asdal, Geoforum, 2008, 39, 123–132.
74
Kim Fortun, Osiris, 2004, 19, 283–296.
75
J. Gabrys, H. Pritchard and B. Barratt, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716679677.
76
J. Whitington, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 2016, 39, 46–63.
77
B. Büscher, Geoforum, 2013, 44, 1–3.
78
T. Nadim, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716666301.
79
E. Garnett, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716658061.
80
K. Fortun, L. Poirier, A. Morgan, B. Costelloe-Kuehn and M. Fortun, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716668903.
81
S. Dalsgaard, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2013, 3, 80–98.
82
M. Grebowicz, Environmental Humanities, 2014, 5, 1–11.
83
Stefan Helmreich, Social Research, 2011, 78, 1211–1242.
84
R. McNally, A. Mackenzie, A. Hui and J. Tomomitsu, International Journal of Digital Curation, 2012, 7, 81–94.
85
J. Gabrys, Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2016, vol. Electronic mediations.
86
I. Lippert, Geoforum, 2015, 66, 126–135.
87
H. Verran, in Inventive methods: the happening of the social, eds. C. Lury and N. Wakeford, Routledge, Abingdon, 2014, vol. Culture, economy and the social.
88
H. Knox, in Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas, eds. H. Appel, A. Mason and M. Watts, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2015.
89
Richard Maxwell ; Jon Raundand Nina Lager Vestberg, in Media and the Ecological Crisis: Routledge research in cultural and media studies 67.
90
Sabina Leonelli, Philosophy of Science, 2015, 82, 810–821.
91
S. Shackley and B. Wynne, Science, Technology & Human Values, 1996, 21, 275–302.
92
J. Fairhead, M. Leach and I. Scoones, Journal of Peasant Studies, 2012, 39, 237–261.
93
M. Lehning, N. Dawes and M. Bavay et. al., in The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery, Microsoft Research, Redmond, Wash, pp. 45–51.
94
S. Helmreich, BioSocieties, 2007, 2, 287–302.
95
J. Igoe, Critique of Anthropology, 2010, 30, 375–397.
96
S. Franklin, Anthropological Theory, 2003, 3, 65–85.
97
R. Rapp, BioSocieties, , DOI:10.1057/biosoc.2015.33.
98
D. Lupton, Critical Public Health, 2013, 23, 393–403.
99
Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.
100
Emily Martin, American Ethnologist, 1992, 19, 121–140.
101
R. Tutton and B. Prainsack, Sociology of Health & Illness, 2011, 33, 1081–1095.
102
M. Ruckenstein, Societies, 2014, 4, 68–84.
103
After Kinship by Janet Carsten, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.
104
L. A. Sharp, Annual Review of Anthropology, 2000, 29, 287–328.
105
E. Thacker, Configurations, 2003, 11, 47–79.
106
A. Beaulieu, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 2004, 35, 367–390.
107
N. Singer, The New York Times.
108
M. Strathern, After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992, vol. The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures.
109
D. Lupton, Sociology of Health & Illness, 2014, 36, 856–869.
110
S. Franklin, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies, Duke University Press, Durham [N.C.], 2001, pp. 302–325.
111
S. Helmreich, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies, Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 2002, pp. 116–143.
112
Dawn Nafus, International Journal of Communication.
113
J. Fujimara, in The practices of human genetics, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1999, vol. Sociology of the sciences, pp. 49–87.
114
P. Rabinow, Essays on the anthropology of reason, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, 1996, vol. Princeton studies in culture/power/history.
115
A. Gross, The Sociological Review, 2011, 59, 113–129.
116
J. Van Dijck, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 2000, 31, 271–285.
117
C. Gerlitz and C. Lury, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 174–188.
118
M. Kaufmann, Media, Culture & Society, 2015, 37, 972–987.
119
D. Nafus, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 208–222.
120
M. Strathern, in Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005, pp. 111–134.
121
G. Steinmetz, in State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1999, vol. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture.
122
L. Amoore, Political Geography, 2006, 25, 336–351.
123
S. Browne, Dark Matters, Duke University Press, 2015.
124
The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED.
125
C. Birchall, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716663965.
126
V. Adams, Metrics, Duke University Press, 2016.
127
K. D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, British Journal of Sociology, 2000, 51, 605–622.
128
A. Sharma and A. Gupta, in The anthropology of the state: a reader, Blackwell, Malden, Mass, 2006, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology.
129
Universitetet i Oslo, State formation: anthropological perspectives, Pluto Press, London, 2005, vol. Anthropology, culture, and society.
130
Isin, E and Ruppert E (2017) Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 11 843-857, http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934.
131
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon, in Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies.
132
Isin, E and Ruppert E (2017) Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 11 843-857, http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934.
133
J. Cheney-Lippold, Theory, Culture & Society, 2011, 28, 164–181.
134
L. Roderick, Critical Sociology, 2014, 40, 729–746.
135
E. Ruppert, Sociology, 2011, 45, 218–233.
136
A. M’charek, K. Schramm and D. Skinner, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2014, 39, 468–487.
137
Gilles Deleuze, October, 1992, 59, 3–7.
138
E. Ruppert and M. Savage, The Sociological Review, 2011, 59, 73–92.
139
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J, .
140
D. Lyon, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714541861.
141
D. LYON, Bioethics, 2008, 22, 499–508.
142
Evelyn Ruppert, Sociology, 2011, 45, 218–233.
143
D. Lupton, Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015.
144
M. Fuller and A. Goffey, in Evil media, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2012, pp. 100–104.
145
J. Vertesi, Time.com, 2014, 1–1.
146
L. Amoore, Theory, Culture & Society, 2011, 28, 24–43.
147
M. Strathern, in Conceptualizing society, Routledge, London, 1992, pp. 75–106.
148
E. Ruppert, Theory, Culture & Society, 2012, 29, 116–136.
149
D. Lyon, Bioethics, 2008, 22, 499–508.
150
D. Lyon, International Political Sociology, 2010, 4, 325–338.
151
Anna Tsing, Cultural Anthropology, 2000, 15, 327–360.
152
C. Coopmans, in Representation in scientific practice revisited, ed. C. Coopmans, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2014, vol. Inside technology.
153
The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete | WIRED, https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
154
B. Latour, P. Jensen, T. Venturini, S. Grauwin and D. Boullier, The British Journal of Sociology, 2012, 63, 590–615.
155
R. W. Lake, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716682537.
156
Annelise Riles, American Ethnologist, 1998, 25, 378–398.
157
danah boyd and K. Crawford, Information, Communication & Society, 2012, 15, 662–679.
158
N. Seaver, Media, Culture & Society, 2015, 37, 1101–1109.
159
MARILYN STRATHERN, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 2001, 22, 52–66.
160
T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Eds., in Data, now bigger and better!, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2015, vol. Paradigm.
162
R. L. Breiger, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951715602497.
163
R. Kitchin, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714528481.
164
M. Strathern, Partial connections, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, Updated ed., 2004.
165
M. Strathern, in Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, vol. The Linacre lectures, pp. 44–71.
166
M. Strathern, in Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices, Duke University Press, Durham, 2002, vol. Science and cultural theory.
167
B. Marr, The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data, http://data-informed.com/.
168
G. Marcus, in Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, 2010, pp. 28–46.
169
N. Couldry and A. Powell, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714539277.
170
S. Lash, Theory, Culture & Society, 2007, 24, 55–78.
171
G. C. Bowker, International Journal of Communication.
172
D. Beer and R. Burrows, Theory, Culture & Society, 2013, 30, 47–71.
173
A. Riles, The network inside out: Annelise Riles, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2001.
174
Wendy F. Hsu, , DOI:10.4324/9781315673974.ch4.
175
N. Seaver, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951717738104.
176
A. Mackenzie, Social Studies of Science, 2003, 33, 365–387.
177
M. Candea, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2007, 13, 167–184.
178
G. E. Marcus, Annual Review of Anthropology, 1995, 24, 95–117.
179
T. Boellstorff, in Digital anthropology, Berg, London, 2012.
180
J. L. Jackson Jr., Cultural Anthropology, 27, 480–497.
181
M. Strathern, in Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things, Athlone, London, 1999.
182
C. Kelty, G. Coleman and K. Strassler, Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection, http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection.
183
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro, Cultural Anthropology, 2008, 23, 1–14.
184
G. E. MARCUS, Cultural Anthropology, 2012, 27, 427–445.
185
Marilyn Strathern, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 2001, 22, 52–66.
186
M. Strathern, in Anthropology at home, Tavistock Publications, London, 1987, vol. A.S.A. monographs, pp. 16–37.
187
N. M. Underberg and E. Zorn, Visual Anthropology, 2013, 26, 1–17.
188
J. D. Faubion and G. E. Marcus, Fieldwork is not what it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2009.
189
N. Marres and E. Weltevrede, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2013, 6, 313–335.
190
A. Blok and M. A. Pedersen, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714543908.
191
K. Anderson, D. Nafus, T. Rattenbury and R. Aipperspach, Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2009, 2009, 123–140.
192
Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium, https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7.
193
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows, Sociology, 2007, 41, 885–899.
194
D. Nafus, Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC, https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/.
195
E. Ruppert, J. Law and M. Savage, Theory, Culture & Society, 2013, 30, 22–46.
196
H. Ford, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714544337.
197
» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST, https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/.
198
Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab, http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/.
