‘» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five Recent Play Dates - EASST’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/>.
‘Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/Is the World in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology’. n. pag. Web. <https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data>.
Adams, Vincanne. Metrics. Duke University Press, 2016. Web. <http://read.dukeupress.edu/lookup/doi/10.1215/9780822374480>.
‘After Kinship by Janet Carsten’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9>.
‘---’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9>.
Amoore, L. ‘Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times’. Theory, Culture & Society 28.6 (2011): 24–43. Web.
Amoore, Louise. ‘Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror’. Political Geography 25.3 (2006): 336–351. Web.
Anderson, Ken et al. ‘Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining’. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings 2009.1 (2009): 123–140. Web.
Anna Tsing. ‘The Global Situation’. Cultural Anthropology 15.3 (2000): 327–360. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Annelise Riles. ‘Infinity within the Brackets’. American Ethnologist 25.3 (1998): 378–398. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
---. ‘Infinity within the Brackets’. American Ethnologist 25.3 (1998): 378–398. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Annette B. Weiner. ‘Inalienable Wealth’. American Ethnologist 12.2 (1985): 210–227. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/644217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Arturo Escobar. ‘After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology’. Current Anthropology 40.1 (1999): 1–30. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Asdal, Kristin. ‘Enacting Things through Numbers: Taking Nature into Account/Ing’. Geoforum 39.1 (2008): 123–132. Web.
Beaulieu, Anne. ‘From Brainbank to Database: The Informational Turn in the Study of the Brain’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35.2 (2004): 367–390. Web.
Beer, D., and R. Burrows. ‘Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data’. Theory, Culture & Society 30.4 (2013): 47–71. Web.
Beer, David. ‘How Should We Do the History of Big Data?’ Big Data & Society 3.1 (2016): n. pag. Web.
---. ‘Productive Measures: Culture and Measurement in the Context of Everyday Neoliberalism’. Big Data & Society 2.1 (2015): n. pag. Web.
Biagioli, M. ‘Rights or Rewards? Changing Frameworks of Scientific Authorship’. Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. New York: Routledge, 2013. 253–281. Web. <http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203954270>.
Biagioli, Mario. ‘Between Knowledge And Technology: Patenting Methods, Rethinking Materiality’. Anthropological Forum 22.3 (2012): 285–299. Web.
Birchall, Clare. ‘Shareveillance: Subjectivity between Open and Closed Data’. Big Data & Society 3.2 (2016): n. pag. Web.
Blok, A., and M. A. Pedersen. ‘Complementary Social Science? Quali-Quantitative Experiments in a Big Data World’. Big Data & Society 1.2 (2014): n. pag. Web.
Boellstorff, T. ‘Rethinking Digital Anthropology’. Digital Anthropology. London: Berg, 2012. Web. <https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922>.
Boellstorff, Tom, and Bill Maurer, eds. ‘Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data’,. Data, Now Bigger and Better!. Paradigm. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015. Print.
---, eds. ‘Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra’. Data, Now Bigger and Better!. Paradigm. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015. Print.
Bowker, G. ‘Databasing the World: Biodiversity and the 2000s’. Memory Practices in the Sciences. Inside technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005. 107–136. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4bbefe35-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Bowker, Geoffrey C. ‘The Theory/Data Thing’. International Journal of Communication 8 (2014): n. pag. Web. <http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190>.
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences. Inside technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1999. Web. <http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out>.
boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford. ‘CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA’. Information, Communication & Society 15.5 (2012): 662–679. Web.
Breiger, R. L. ‘Scaling Down’. Big Data & Society 2.2 (2015): n. pag. Web.
Brine, Kevin R., and Mary Poovey. ‘From Measuring Desire to Quantifying Expectations: A Late Nineteenth- Century Effort to Marry Economic Theory and Data’. ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron. Infrastructures series. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2013. Web. <https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327>.
Brown, D., and G. Nicholas. ‘Protecting Indigenous Cultural Property in the Age of Digital Democracy: Institutional and Communal Responses to Canadian First Nations and Maori Heritage Concerns’. Journal of Material Culture 17.3 (2012): 307–324. Web.
Browne, Simone. Dark Matters. Duke University Press, 2015. Web. <http://read.dukeupress.edu/lookup/doi/10.1215/9780822375302>.
Büscher, Bram. ‘Nature 2.0’. Geoforum 44 (2013): 1–3. Web.
---. ‘Nature 2.0: Exploring and Theorizing the Links between New Media and Nature Conservation’. New Media & Society 18.5 (2016): 726–743. Web.
Candea, Matei. ‘Arbitrary Locations: In Defence of the Bounded Field-Site’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13.1 (2007): 167–184. Web.
Cheney-Lippold, John. ‘A New Algorithmic Identity’. Theory, Culture & Society 28.6 (2011): 164–181. Web.
Chua, L., and A. Salmond. ‘Artefacts in Anthropology’. The SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2012. 101–114. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=11445b7c-8636-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. ‘The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory’. Critical Inquiry 35.1 (2008): 148–171. Web.
Coopmans, Catelijne. ‘Visual Analytics as Artful Revelation’. Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Ed. Catelijne Coopmans. Inside technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Couldry, N., and A. Powell. ‘Big Data from the Bottom Up’. Big Data & Society 1.2 (2014): n. pag. Web.
D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, Kevin. ‘The Surveillant Assemblage’. British Journal of Sociology 51.4 (2000): 605–622. Web.
D. Miller. ‘Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities’. The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture. School of American Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press, 2001. Print.
Dalsgaard, Steffen. ‘The Commensurability of Carbon’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3.1 (2013): 80–98. Web.
Dalsgaard, Steffen, and Morten Nielsen. ‘Introduction: Time and the Field’. Social Analysis 57.1 (2013): 1–19. Web.
Dawn Nafus. ‘Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’. International Journal of Communication 8 (2014): n. pag. Web. <http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170>.
‘Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: A Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4.’ n. pag. Web. <http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology>.
Elizabeth A. Povinelli. ‘The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives’. Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies 22.1 (2011): 146–171. Web. <http://differences.dukejournals.org/content/22/1/146.short>.
Emily Martin. ‘The End of the Body?’ American Ethnologist 19.1 (1992): 121–140. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/644828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Evelyn Ruppert. ‘Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects’. Sociology 45.2 (2011): 218–233. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Fairhead, James, Melissa Leach, and Ian Scoones. ‘Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature?’ Journal of Peasant Studies 39.2 (2012): 237–261. Web.
Faubion, James D., and George E. Marcus. Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009. Print.
Floridi, Luciano. ‘A Look into the Future Impact of ICT on Our Lives’. The Information Society 23.1 (2007): 59–64. Web.
Ford, H. ‘Big Data and Small: Collaborations between Ethnographers and Data Scientists’. Big Data & Society 1.2 (2014): n. pag. Web.
Fortun, Kim et al. ‘Pushback: Critical Data Designers and Pollution Politics’. Big Data & Society 3.2 (2016): n. pag. Web.
Franklin, S. ‘Biologization Re-Visited: Kinship Theory’. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press, 2001. 302–325. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0>.
---. ‘Re-Thinking Nature-Culture: Anthropology and the New Genetics’. Anthropological Theory 3.1 (2003): 65–85. Web.
Fujimara, J. ‘The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics’. The Practices of Human Genetics. Sociology of the sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1999. 49–87. Print.
Fuller, M., and A. Goffey. ‘Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction’. Theory, Culture & Society 29.4–5 (2012): 311–333. Web.
Fuller, M, and A Goffey. ‘Leak Early, Leak Often’. Evil Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2012. 100–104. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>.
Gabrys, Jennifer. Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. Electronic mediations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq>.
Gabrys, Jennifer, Helen Pritchard, and Benjamin Barratt. ‘Just Good Enough Data: Figuring Data Citizenships through Air Pollution Sensing and Data Stories’. Big Data & Society 3.2 (2016): n. pag. Web.
Garnett, Emma. ‘Developing a Feeling for Error: Practices of Monitoring and Modelling Air Pollution Data’. Big Data & Society 3.2 (2016): n. pag. Web.
Geismar, Haidy, and William Mohns. ‘Social Relationships and Digital Relationships: Rethinking the Database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17 (2011): S133–S155. Web.
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro. ‘The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition’. Cultural Anthropology 23.1 (2008): 1–14. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Gerlitz, Carolin, and Celia Lury. ‘Social Media and Self-Evaluating Assemblages: On Numbers, Orderings and Values’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15.2 (2014): 174–188. Web.
Gilles Deleuze. ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’. October 59 (1992): 3–7. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Gitelman, Lisa. ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron. Infrastructures series. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2013. Web. <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327>.
Grebowicz, Margret. ‘Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The Social Effects of Climate Change as Internet Spectacle’. Environmental Humanities 5 (2014): 1–11. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615388>.
‘Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In “Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life” Ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter>.
Gregg, M. ‘The Gift That Is Not Given’. Data, Now Bigger and Better!. Ed. Tom Boellstorff and Bill Maurer. Paradigm. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015. Print.
Gregory, C. A. Gifts and Commodities. Studies in political economy. London: Academic Press, 1982. Print.
Gross, Ana. ‘The Economy of Social Data: Exploring Research Ethics as Device’. The Sociological Review 59 (2011): 113–129. Web.
Hacking, I. ‘The Argument’. The Taming of Chance. Ideas in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 1–10. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766>.
Halpern, Orit. Beautiful Data. Duke University Press, 2015. Web.
---. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Experimental futures. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2014. Print.
---. ‘Cybernetic Rationality’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15.2 (2014): 223–238. Web.
Haraway, D. ‘Chapter 4: Gene’. Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge, 1997. Print.
Harvey, P. ‘The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach’. Theory, Culture & Society 29.4–5 (2012): 76–92. Web.
Helmond, Anne. ‘“Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron’. Information, Communication & Society 17.9 (2014): 1171–1173. Web.
Helmreich, S. ‘Kinship in Hypertext’. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002. 116–143. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222>.
Helmreich, Stefan. ‘Blue-Green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy’. BioSocieties 2.3 (2007): 287–302. Web.
Hilgartner, Stephen. ‘Selective Flows of Knowledge in Technoscientific Interaction: Information Control in Genome Research’. The British Journal for the History of Science 45.02 (2012): 267–280. Web.
Hirsch, Eric, and Marilyn Strathern. Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books, 2004. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk>.
Hogan, Mél. ‘Data Flows and Water Woes: The Utah Data Center’. Big Data & Society 2.2 (2015): n. pag. Web.
Hui, Yuk. ‘What Is a Digital Object?’ Metaphilosophy 43.4 (2012): 380–395. Web.
Igoe, J. ‘The Spectacle of Nature in the Global Economy of Appearances: Anthropological Engagements with the Spectacular Mediations of Transnational Conservation’. Critique of Anthropology 30.4 (2010): 375–397. Web.
‘Isin, E and Ruppert E (2017) Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 11 843-857’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934>.
‘---’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934>.
J. Holt, and Patrick Vondereau. ‘Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure’. Traffic Signal Timing Manual. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2014. Web. <http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024>.
Jackson Jr., John L. ‘Ethnography Is, Ethnography Ain’t’. Cultural Anthropology 27.3 480–497. Web.
Jensen, Casper Bruun, and Atsuro Morita. ‘Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments’. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 1 (2015): 81–87. Web. <http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21>.
JIMÉNEZ, ALBERTO CORSÍN. ‘Relations and Disproportions: The Labor of Scholarship in the Knowledge Economy’. American Ethnologist 35.2 (2008): 229–242. Web.
John, Nicholas A. ‘Sharing and Web 2.0: The Emergence of a Keyword’. New Media & Society 15.2 (2013): 167–182. Web.
Kaufmann, M. ‘Resilience 2.0: Social Media Use and (Self-)Care during the 2011 Norway Attacks’. Media, Culture & Society 37.7 (2015): 972–987. Web.
Kelty, Christopher, Gabriella Coleman, and Karen Strassler. ‘Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection’. Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online. N.p., 13 Dec. 2012. Web. <http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection>.
Kelty, Christopher M. ‘This Is Not an Article: Model Organism Newsletters and the Question of “Open Science”’. BioSocieties 7.2 (2012): 140–168. Web.
Kim Fortun. ‘From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective’. Osiris 19 (2004): 283–296. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon. ‘Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0.’ Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. N.p. Web.
Kitchin, R. ‘Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts’. Big Data & Society 1.1 (2014): n. pag. Web.
Knox, H. ‘Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil’. Subterranean Estates: Life Worlds of Oil and Gas. Ed. Hannah Appel, Arthur Mason, and Michael Watts. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0>.
Laidlaw, James. ‘A Free Gift Makes No Friends’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6.4 (2000): 617–634. Web.
Lake, Robert W. ‘Big Data, Urban Governance, and the Ontological Politics of Hyperindividualism’. Big Data & Society 4.1 (2017): n. pag. Web.
Lash, S. ‘Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation?’ Theory, Culture & Society 24.3 (2007): 55–78. Web.
Latour, B. ‘Circulating Reference’. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999. 24–79. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3281174a-6036-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Latour, Bruno et al. ‘“The Whole Is Always Smaller than Its Parts” - a Digital Test of Gabriel Tardes’ Monads’. The British Journal of Sociology 63.4 (2012): 590–615. Web.
Leach, James. ‘The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration’. Social Analysis 55.3 (2011): n. pag. Web.
Lehning, M., N. Dawes, and M. Bavay et. al. ‘Instrumenting the Earth: Next-Generation Sensor Networks and Environmental Science’. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, Wash: Microsoft Research. 45–51. Print.
Leonelli, S. ‘Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology’. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 33.1–2 (2013): 6–11. Web.
Lezaun, J., and C. M. Montgomery. ‘The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development’. Science, Technology & Human Values 40.1 (2015): 3–29. Web.
Lippert, Ingmar. ‘Environment as Datascape: Enacting Emission Realities in Corporate Carbon Accounting’. Geoforum 66 (2015): 126–135. Web.
Lupton, Deborah. ‘Quantifying the Body: Monitoring and Measuring Health in the Age of mHealth Technologies’. Critical Public Health 23.4 (2013): 393–403. Web.
---. ‘Self-Tracking Modes: Relflexive Self-Monitoring and Data Practices’. Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015. Web. <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549>.
---. ‘The Commodification of Patient Opinion: The Digital Patient Experience Economy in the Age of Big Data’. Sociology of Health & Illness 36.6 (2014): 856–869. Web.
LYON, DAVID. ‘BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE’. Bioethics 22.9 (2008): 499–508. Web.
Lyon, David. ‘Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance’. Bioethics 22.9 (2008): 499–508. Web.
---. ‘Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1’. International Political Sociology 4.4 (2010): 325–338. Web.
---. ‘Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique’. Big Data & Society 1.2 (2014): n. pag. Web.
Mackenzie, Adrian. ‘Multiplying Numbers Differently: An Epidemiology of Contagious Convolution’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15.2 (2014): 189–207. Web.
---. ‘These Things Called Systems’. Social Studies of Science 33.3 (2003): 365–387. Web.
Manovich, L. ‘Database as Symbolic Form’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 5.2 (1999): 80–99. Web.
Marcus, G. ‘Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue’. Experiments in Holism: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 28–46. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426>.
Marcus, George E. ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’. Annual Review of Anthropology 24.1 (1995): 95–117. Web.
MARCUS, GEORGE E. ‘THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch’. Cultural Anthropology 27.3 (2012): 427–445. Web.
MARILYN STRATHERN. ‘VIRTUAL SOCIETY? GET REAL! Ashridge 4–5 May 2000: Conference of the “Virtual Society?: The Social Science of Electronic Technologies” Programme: Abstraction and Decontextualisation: An Anthropological Comment’. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 22.1 (2001): 52–66. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23820353?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Marilyn Strathern. ‘Virtual Society? Get Real! Ashridge 4–5 May 2000: Conference of the “Virtual Society?: The Social Science of Electronic Technologies” Programme: Abstraction and Decontextualisation: An Anthropological Comment’. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 22.1 (2001): 52–66. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/23820353?seq=8#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Marr, Bernard. ‘The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data’. Data Informed, 21AD. Web. <http://data-informed.com/>.
Marres, Noortje, and Esther Weltevrede. ‘Scraping the Social?’ Journal of Cultural Economy 6.3 (2013): 313–335. Web.
Maurer, Bill. ‘Late to the Party: Debt and Data’. Social Anthropology 20.4 (2012): 474–481. Web.
Maurer, W.M. ‘Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data’. Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago, 2015. 67–86. Web. <http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161>.
M’charek, Amade, Katharina Schramm, and David Skinner. ‘Topologies of Race’. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39.4 (2014): 468–487. Web.
McNally, Ruth et al. ‘Understanding the “Intensive” in “Data Intensive Research”: Data Flows in Next Generation Sequencing and Environmental Networked Sensors’. International Journal of Digital Curation 7.1 (2012): 81–94. Web.
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows. ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’. Sociology 41.5 (2007): 885–899. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Nadim, Tahani. ‘Blind Regards: Troubling Data and Their Sentinels’. Big Data & Society 3.2 (2016): n. pag. Web.
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J. ‘This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’. n. pag. Web. <http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056>.
Nafus, Dawn. ‘Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC’. EPIC. EPICPeople.org, 15 May 2015. Web. <https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/>.
---. ‘Stuck Data, Dead Data, and Disloyal Data: The Stops and Starts in Making Numbers into Social Practices’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15.2 (2014): 208–222. Web.
Porter, Theodore M. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1995. Print.
‘Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/>.
Rabinow, Paul. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1996. Print.
Rapp, Rayna. ‘Big Data, Small Kids: Medico-Scientific, Familial and Advocacy Visions of Human Brains’. BioSocieties (2015): n. pag. Web.
Richard Maxwell ; Jon Raundand Nina Lager Vestberg. ‘Gabrys, J. (2015) Powering Ecologies: From Energy Ecologies to Electronic Environmentalism’. Media and the Ecological Crisis: Routledge Research in Cultural and Media Studies 67. N.p. Print.
Richardson, Sarah S. ; Stevens, Hallam. ‘Fortun, M. (2015) What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics’. Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome. N.p. Web. <http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=4&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_dawson9780822375449&indx=2&recIds=TN_dawson9780822375449&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=4&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Postgenomics%3A%20Perspectives%20on%20Biology%20After%20the%20Genome&dstmp=1471430773987>.
Riles, A. ‘Introduction: In Response’. Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006. 1–38. Print.
Riles, Annelise. The Network inside out: Annelise Riles. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001. Print.
Roderick, Leanne. ‘Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry’. Critical Sociology 40.5 (2014): 729–746. Web.
Rosemary J. Coombe and Andrew Herman. ‘Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web’. Anthropological Quarterly 77.3 (2004): 559–574. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3318236>.
Rosenberg, D. ‘Data before the Fact’. ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron. Ed. Lisa Gitelman. Infrastructures series. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2013. Web. <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327>.
Rubio, Fernando Dominguez, and Patrick Baert, eds. ‘Leach, J. (2012) “Step inside: Knowledge Freely Available”: The Politics of (Making) Knowledge-Objects’.’ The Politics of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2012. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386>.
Ruckenstein, Minna. ‘Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles’. Societies 4.1 (2014): 68–84. Web.
Ruppert, E. ‘The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices’. Theory, Culture & Society 29.4–5 (2012): 116–136. Web.
Ruppert, E., J. Law, and M. Savage. ‘Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices’. Theory, Culture & Society 30.4 (2013): 22–46. Web.
Ruppert, Evelyn. ‘Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects’. Sociology 45.2 (2011): 218–233. Web.
Ruppert, Evelyn, and Mike Savage. ‘Transactional Politics’. The Sociological Review 59 (2011): 73–92. Web.
S. Day, and C. Lury. ‘Biosensing: Tracking Persons.’ Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press, 2016. Web. <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter>.
Sabina Leonelli. ‘What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework’. Philosophy of Science 82.5 (2015): 810–821. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Salmond, Amiria J. M. ‘Transforming Translations (Part I)’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3.3 (2013): n. pag. Web.
Seaver, Nick. ‘Algorithms as Culture: Some Tactics for the Ethnography of Algorithmic Systems’. Big Data & Society 4.2 (2017): n. pag. Web.
---. ‘The Nice Thing about Context Is That Everyone Has It’. Media, Culture & Society 37.7 (2015): 1101–1109. Web.
Shackley, S., and B. Wynne. ‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’. Science, Technology & Human Values 21.3 (1996): 275–302. Web.
Sharma, Aradhana, and Akhil Gupta. ‘Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-Thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization’. The Anthropology of the State: A Reader. Blackwell readers in anthropology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2006. Print.
Sharp, Lesley A. ‘The Commodification of the Body and Its Parts’. Annual Review of Anthropology 29.1 (2000): 287–328. Web.
Singer, Natasha. ‘From Knowing Yourself to Prodding Yourself’. The New York Times (2015): n. pag. Print.
Stefan Helmreich. ‘From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures’. Social Research 78.4 (2011): 1211–1242. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Steinmetz, George. ‘Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn.’ State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>.
Strathern, M. ‘Environments within: An Ethnographic Commentary on Scale’. Culture, Landscape, and the Environment: The Linacre Lectures, 1997. The Linacre lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 44–71. Print.
---. ‘On Space and Depth’. Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Science and cultural theory. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550>.
Strathern, M. ‘The Limits of Auto-Anthropology’. Anthropology at Home. A.S.A. monographs. London: Tavistock Publications, 1987. 16–37. Print.
Strathern, M. ‘The Patent and the Malanggan’. Theory, Culture & Society 18.4 (2001): 1–26. Web.
Strathern, Marilyn. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Print.
---. ‘Chapter 1’. Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone, 1999. Print.
---. ‘Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources’. Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 111–134. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514>.
---. ‘Externalities in Comparative Guise’. Economy and Society 31.2 (2002): 250–267. Web.
---. Partial Connections. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 2004. Print.
---. ‘Parts and Wholes: Refiguring Relationships in a Post-Plural World’. Conceptualizing Society. London: Routledge, 1992. 75–106. Web. <http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244>.
Strathern, Marilyn and University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Prickly Pear pamphlet. Cambridge, U.K.: Prickly Pear Press, 1995. Print.
Striphas, Ted. ‘Algorithmic Culture’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18.4–5 (2015): 395–412. Web.
Thacker, Eugene. ‘What Is Biomedia?’ Configurations 11.1 (2003): 47–79. Web.
‘The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete | WIRED’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/>.
‘The World of Indicators Edited by Richard Rottenburg’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED>.
‘To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World’. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 44.3 (2015): 436–437. Web.
Tsing, Anna. ‘Sorting out Commodities: How Capitalist Value Is Made through Gifts’. HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3.1 (2013): 21–43. Web. <https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo>.
Tutton, Richard, and Barbara Prainsack. ‘Enterprising or Altruistic Selves? Making up Research Subjects in Genetics Research’. Sociology of Health & Illness 33.7 (2011): 1081–1095. Web.
Underberg, Natalie M., and Elayne Zorn. ‘Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography’. Visual Anthropology 26.1 (2013): 1–17. Web.
Universitetet i Oslo. State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives. Ed. Christian Krohn-Hansen and Knut G. Nustad. Anthropology, culture, and society. London: Pluto Press, 2005. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7>.
Van Dijck, José. ‘Digital Cadavers: The Visible Human Project as Anatomical Theater’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31.2 (2000): 271–285. Web.
Van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell. ‘Understanding the Promises and Premises of Online Health Platforms’. Big Data & Society 3.1 (2016): n. pag. Web.
Velkova, Julia. ‘Data That Warms: Waste Heat, Infrastructural Convergence and the Computation Traffic Commodity’. Big Data & Society 3.2 (2016): n. pag. Web.
Verran, H. ‘Number as Generative Device’. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Ed. Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford. Culture, economy and the social. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. Print.
Verran, Helen. ‘On Assemblage’. Journal of Cultural Economy 2.1–2 (2009): 169–182. Web.
---. ‘The Changing Lives of Measures and Values: From Centre Stage in the Fading “Disciplinary” Society to Pervasive Background Instrument in the Emergent “Control” Society’. The Sociological Review 59.2_suppl (2011): 60–72. Web.
Vertesi, Janet. ‘My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal.’ Time.com (2014): 1–1. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site>.
Walford, Antonia. ‘Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously’. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 30.2 (2012): n. pag. Web.
Weiner, A. B. ‘Inalienable Possessions: The Forgotten Dimension’. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992. 23–43. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=7cf9c98c-5836-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
---. ‘Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau’. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992. Print.
Wendy F. Hsu. ‘Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In “The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography” Eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge’. (2016): n. pag. Web. <https://www-routledgehandbooks-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.4324/9781315673974.ch4>.
Whitington, Jerome. ‘Carbon as a Metric of the Human’. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 39.1 (2016): 46–63. Web.
‘Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7>.
