Bibliography for ANTHGC25: Advanced Topics in Digital Culture BETA

1.

Beer, D.: How should we do the history of Big Data? Big Data & Society. 3, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716646135.

2.

Halpern, O.: Beautiful Data. Duke University Press (2015). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376323-010.

3.

Rubio, F.D., Baert, P. eds: Leach, J. (2012) ‘Step inside: knowledge freely available’: The politics of (making) knowledge-objects’. In: The politics of knowledge. Routledge, London (2012).

4.

Boellstorff, T., Maurer, B. eds: Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra. In: Data, now bigger and better! Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago (2015).

5.

Annelise Riles: Infinity within the Brackets. American Ethnologist. 25, 378–398 (1998).

6.

Latour, B.: Circulating Reference. In: Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. pp. 24–79. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1999).

7.

Striphas, T.: Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 18, 395–412 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392.

8.

Rosenberg, D.: Data before the fact. In: Gitelman, L. (ed.) ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2013).

9.

Beer, D.: Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism. Big Data & Society. 2, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715578951.

10.

Floridi, L.: A Look into the Future Impact of ICT on Our Lives. The Information Society. 23, 59–64 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240601059094.

11.

Verran, H.: The Changing Lives of Measures and Values: From Centre Stage in the Fading ‘Disciplinary’ Society to Pervasive Background Instrument in the Emergent ‘Control’ Society. The Sociological Review. 59, 60–72 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x.

12.

Hacking, I.: The argument. In: The Taming of Chance. pp. 1–10. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).

13.

Porter, T.M.: Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J (1995).

14.

Hui, Y.: What is a Digital Object? Metaphilosophy. 43, 380–395 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x.

15.

Halpern, O.: Cybernetic rationality. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 15, 223–238 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320.

16.

Halpern, O.: Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C. (2014).

17.

Riles, A.: Introduction: in response. In: Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge. pp. 1–38. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2006).

18.

Chua, L., Salmond, A.: Artefacts in anthropology. In: The SAGE handbook of social anthropology. pp. 101–114. SAGE, Los Angeles (2012).

19.

JIMÉNEZ, A.C.: Relations and disproportions: The labor of scholarship in the knowledge economy. American Ethnologist. 35, 229–242 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00035.x.

20.

Gitelman, L.: ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2013).

21.

Manovich, L.: Database as Symbolic Form. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 5, 80–99 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/135485659900500206.

22.

Elizabeth A. Povinelli: The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives. Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies. 22, 146–171 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1218274.

23.

Hogan, M.: Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center. Big Data & Society. 2, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715592429.

24.

Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: a Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4.

25.

Geismar, H., Mohns, W.: Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 17, S133–S155 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x.

26.

Velkova, J.: Data that warms: Waste heat, infrastructural convergence and the computation traffic commodity. Big Data & Society. 3, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716684144.

27.

Bowker, G.: Databasing the world: Biodiversity and the 2000s. In: Memory practices in the sciences. pp. 107–136. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2005).

28.

Harvey, P.: The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach. Theory, Culture & Society. 29, 76–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412448827.

29.

To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. 44, 436–437 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306115579192c.

30.

Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L.: Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1999).

31.

J. Holt, Patrick Vondereau: Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure. In: Traffic signal timing manual. U.S. Department of Transportation, [Washington, D.C.] (2014).

32.

Salmond, A.J.M.: Transforming translations (part I). HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 3, (2013). https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.002.

33.

Chun, W.H.K.: The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory. Critical Inquiry. 35, 148–171 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1086/595632.

34.

Fuller, M., Goffey, A.: Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction. Theory, Culture & Society. 29, 311–333 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412450466.

35.

Haraway, D.: Chapter 4: Gene. In: Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. Routledge, New York (1997).

36.

Verran, H.: On assemblage. Journal of Cultural Economy. 2, 169–182 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064188.

37.

Mackenzie, A.: Multiplying numbers differently: an epidemiology of contagious convolution. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 15, 189–207 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110.

38.

Strathern, M., University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology: The relation: issues in complexity and scale. Prickly Pear Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1995).

39.

Jensen, C.B., Morita, A.: Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. 1, 81–87 (2015).

40.

Laidlaw, J.: A free gift makes no friends. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 6, 617–634 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00036.

41.

Tsing, Anna: Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts. HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 3, 21–43 (2013).

42.

John, N.A.: Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society. 15, 167–182 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450684.

43.

Maurer, W.M.: Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data. Presented at the (2015).

44.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T.: Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms. Big Data & Society. 3, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654173.

45.

S. Day, C. Lury: Biosensing: Tracking Persons. In: Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press (2016).

46.

After Kinship by Janet Carsten, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.

47.

Weiner, A.B.: Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau. In: Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. University of California Press, Berkeley (1992).

48.

Leonelli, S.: Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 33, 6–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467613496768.

49.

Richardson, Sarah S. ; Stevens, Hallam: Fortun, M. (2015) What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics. In: Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome.

50.

Biagioli, M.: Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. In: Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science. pp. 253–281. Routledge, New York (2013).

51.

Weiner, A.B.: Inalienable possessions: The forgotten dimension. In: Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. pp. 23–43. University of California Press, Berkeley (1992).

52.

Hilgartner, S.: Selective flows of knowledge in technoscientific interaction: information control in genome research. The British Journal for the History of Science. 45, 267–280 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087412000106.

53.

Kelty, C.M.: This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of ‘open science’. BioSocieties. 7, 140–168 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2012.8.

54.

Hirsch, E., Strathern, M.: Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia. Berghahn Books, New York (2004).

55.

Leach, J.: The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Social Analysis. 55, (2011). https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2011.550308.

56.

Lezaun, J., Montgomery, C.M.: The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development. Science, Technology & Human Values. 40, 3–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914542349.

57.

D. Miller: Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities. In: The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, N.M. (2001).

58.

Gregg, M.: The Gift That Is Not Given. In: Boellstorff, T. and Maurer, B. (eds.) Data, now bigger and better! Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago (2015).

59.

Dalsgaard, S., Nielsen, M.: Introduction: Time and the Field. Social Analysis. 57, 1–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2013.570101.

60.

Biagioli, M.: Between Knowledge And Technology: Patenting Methods, Rethinking Materiality. Anthropological Forum. 22, 285–299 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.724009.

61.

Strathern, M.: The Patent and the Malanggan. Theory, Culture & Society. 18, 1–26 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051850.

62.

Brown, D., Nicholas, G.: Protecting indigenous cultural property in the age of digital democracy: Institutional and communal responses to Canadian First Nations and Maori heritage concerns. Journal of Material Culture. 17, 307–324 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183512454065.

63.

Gregory, C.A.: Gifts and commodities. Academic Press, London (1982).

64.

Maurer, B.: Late to the party: debt and data. Social Anthropology. 20, 474–481 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2012.00219.x.

65.

Strathern, M.: Externalities in comparative guise. Economy and Society. 31, 250–267 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123153.

66.

Rosemary J. Coombe and Andrew Herman: Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web. Anthropological Quarterly. 77, 559–574 (2004).

67.

Annette B. Weiner: Inalienable Wealth. American Ethnologist. 12, 210–227 (1985).

68.

Walford, A.: Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology. 30, (2012). https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2012.300207.

69.

Brine, K.R., Poovey, M.: From Measuring Desire to Quantifying Expectations: A Late Nineteenth- Century Effort to Marry Economic Theory and Data. In: ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2013).

70.

Helmond, A.: ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Information, Communication & Society. 17, 1171–1173 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.920042.

71.

Arturo Escobar: After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology. Current Anthropology. 40, 1–30 (1999).

72.

Büscher, B.: Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society. 18, 726–743 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814545841.

73.

Asdal, K.: Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing. Geoforum. 39, 123–132 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004.

74.

Kim Fortun: From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective. Osiris. 19, 283–296 (2004).

75.

Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., Barratt, B.: Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society. 3, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677.

76.

Whitington, J.: Carbon as a Metric of the Human. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 39, 46–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12130.

77.

Büscher, B.: Nature 2.0. Geoforum. 44, 1–3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.08.004.

78.

Nadim, T.: Blind regards: Troubling data and their sentinels. Big Data & Society. 3, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716666301.

79.

Garnett, E.: Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data. Big Data & Society. 3, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716658061.

80.

Fortun, K., Poirier, L., Morgan, A., Costelloe-Kuehn, B., Fortun, M.: Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics. Big Data & Society. 3, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716668903.

81.

Dalsgaard, S.: The commensurability of carbon. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 3, 80–98 (2013). https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.1.006.

82.

Grebowicz, M.: Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The social effects of climate change as internet spectacle. Environmental Humanities. 5, 1–11 (2014).

83.

Stefan Helmreich: From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures. Social Research. 78, 1211–1242 (2011).

84.

McNally, R., Mackenzie, A., Hui, A., Tomomitsu, J.: Understanding the ‘Intensive’ in ‘Data Intensive Research’: Data Flows in Next Generation Sequencing and Environmental Networked Sensors. International Journal of Digital Curation. 7, 81–94 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.216.

85.

Gabrys, J.: Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2016).

86.

Lippert, I.: Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting. Geoforum. 66, 126–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009.

87.

Verran, H.: Number as Generative Device. In: Lury, C. and Wakeford, N. (eds.) Inventive methods: the happening of the social. Routledge, Abingdon (2014).

88.

Knox, H.: Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil. In: Appel, H., Mason, A., and Watts, M. (eds.) Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2015).

89.

Richard Maxwell ; Jon Raundand Nina Lager Vestberg: Gabrys, J. (2015) Powering Ecologies: From Energy Ecologies to Electronic Environmentalism. In: Media and the Ecological Crisis: Routledge research in cultural and media studies 67.

90.

Sabina Leonelli: What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework. Philosophy of Science. 82, 810–821 (2015).

91.

Shackley, S., Wynne, B.: Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology & Human Values. 21, 275–302 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100302.

92.

Fairhead, J., Leach, M., Scoones, I.: Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies. 39, 237–261 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.

93.

Lehning, M., Dawes, N., Bavay et. al., M.: Instrumenting the earth: Next-generation sensor networks and environmental science. In: The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. pp. 45–51. Microsoft Research, Redmond, Wash.

94.

Helmreich, S.: Blue-green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy. BioSocieties. 2, 287–302 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005753.

95.

Igoe, J.: The spectacle of nature in the global economy of appearances: Anthropological engagements with the spectacular mediations of transnational conservation. Critique of Anthropology. 30, 375–397 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10372468.

96.

Franklin, S.: Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropological Theory. 3, 65–85 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499603003001752.

97.

Rapp, R.: Big data, small kids: Medico-scientific, familial and advocacy visions of human brains. BioSocieties. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.33.

98.

Lupton, D.: Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health. 23, 393–403 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931.

99.

Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.

100.

Emily Martin: The End of the Body? American Ethnologist. 19, 121–140 (1992).

101.

Tutton, R., Prainsack, B.: Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research. Sociology of Health & Illness. 33, 1081–1095 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x.

102.

Ruckenstein, M.: Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies. 4, 68–84 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068.

103.

After Kinship by Janet Carsten, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.

104.

Sharp, L.A.: The Commodification of the Body and its Parts. Annual Review of Anthropology. 29, 287–328 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287.

105.

Thacker, E.: What is Biomedia? Configurations. 11, 47–79 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2004.0014.

106.

Beaulieu, A.: From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 35, 367–390 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011.

107.

Singer, N.: From knowing yourself to prodding yourself. The New York Times. (2015).

108.

Strathern, M.: After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).

109.

Lupton, D.: The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness. 36, 856–869 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12109.

110.

Franklin, S.: Biologization Re-visited: Kinship Theory. In: Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. pp. 302–325. Duke University Press, Durham [N.C.] (2001).

111.

Helmreich, S.: Kinship in Hypertext. In: Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. pp. 116–143. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C. (2002).

112.

Dawn Nafus: Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. International Journal of Communication. 8, (2014).

113.

Fujimara, J.: The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics. In: The practices of human genetics. pp. 49–87. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1999).

114.

Rabinow, P.: Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J (1996).

115.

Gross, A.: The economy of social data: exploring research ethics as device. The Sociological Review. 59, 113–129 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x.

116.

Van Dijck, J.: Digital cadavers: the visible human project as anatomical theater. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 31, 271–285 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5.

117.

Gerlitz, C., Lury, C.: Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 15, 174–188 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267.

118.

Kaufmann, M.: Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks. Media, Culture & Society. 37, 972–987 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715584101.

119.

Nafus, D.: Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: the stops and starts in making numbers into social practices. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 15, 208–222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266.

120.

Strathern, M.: Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources. In: Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise. pp. 111–134. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).

121.

Steinmetz, G.: Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn. In: State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (1999).

122.

Amoore, L.: Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography. 25, 336–351 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001.

123.

Browne, S.: Dark Matters. Duke University Press (2015). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375302.

124.

The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED.

125.

Birchall, C.: Shareveillance: Subjectivity between open and closed data. Big Data & Society. 3, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663965.

126.

Adams, V.: Metrics. Duke University Press (2016). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374480.

127.

D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, K.: The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology. 51, 605–622 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280.

128.

Sharma, A., Gupta, A.: Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization. In: The anthropology of the state: a reader. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2006).

129.

Universitetet i Oslo: State formation: anthropological perspectives. Pluto Press, London (2005).

130.

Isin, E and Ruppert E (2017) Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 11 843-857, http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934.

131.

Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon: Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0. In: Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949.

132.

Isin, E and Ruppert E (2017) Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 11 843-857, http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934.

133.

Cheney-Lippold, J.: A New Algorithmic Identity. Theory, Culture & Society. 28, 164–181 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411424420.

134.

Roderick, L.: Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry. Critical Sociology. 40, 729–746 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501350.

135.

Ruppert, E.: Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects. Sociology. 45, 218–233 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394027.

136.

M’charek, A., Schramm, K., Skinner, D.: Topologies of Race. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 39, 468–487 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913509493.

137.

Gilles Deleuze: Postscript on the Societies of Control. October. 59, 3–7 (1992).

138.

Ruppert, E., Savage, M.: Transactional politics. The Sociological Review. 59, 73–92 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x.

139.

Nafus, D ; Sherman, J: This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice.

140.

Lyon, D.: Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society. 1, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861.

141.

LYON, D.: BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE. Bioethics. 22, 499–508 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.

142.

Evelyn Ruppert: Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects. Sociology. 45, 218–233 (2011).

143.

Lupton, D.: Self-tracking modes: relflexive self-monitoring and data practices, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549.

144.

Fuller, M., Goffey, A.: Leak early, leak often. In: Evil media. pp. 100–104. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2012).

145.

Vertesi, J.: My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal. Time.com. 1–1 (2014).

146.

Amoore, L.: Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times. Theory, Culture & Society. 28, 24–43 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417430.

147.

Strathern, M.: Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world. In: Conceptualizing society. pp. 75–106. Routledge, London (1992).

148.

Ruppert, E.: The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 29, 116–136 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412439428.

149.

Lyon, D.: Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance. Bioethics. 22, 499–508 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.

150.

Lyon, D.: Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1. International Political Sociology. 4, 325–338 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x.

151.

Anna Tsing: The Global Situation. Cultural Anthropology. 15, 327–360 (2000).

152.

Coopmans, C.: Visual analytics as artful revelation. In: Coopmans, C. (ed.) Representation in scientific practice revisited. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2014).

153.

The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete | WIRED, https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.

154.

Latour, B., Jensen, P., Venturini, T., Grauwin, S., Boullier, D.: ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ - a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. The British Journal of Sociology. 63, 590–615 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x.

155.

Lake, R.W.: Big Data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism. Big Data & Society. 4, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716682537.

156.

Annelise Riles: Infinity within the Brackets. American Ethnologist. 25, 378–398 (1998).

157.

boyd, danah, Crawford, K.: CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 662–679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.

158.

Seaver, N.: The nice thing about context is that everyone has it. Media, Culture & Society. 37, 1101–1109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715594102.

159.

MARILYN STRATHERN: VIRTUAL SOCIETY? GET REAL! Ashridge 4–5 May 2000: Conference of the ‘Virtual Society?: the Social Science of Electronic Technologies’ Programme: Abstraction and decontextualisation: an anthropological comment. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology. 22, 52–66 (2001).

160.

Boellstorff, T., Maurer, B. eds: Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data,. In: Data, now bigger and better! Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago (2015).

161.

Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/is the world in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology.

162.

Breiger, R.L.: Scaling down. Big Data & Society. 2, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602497.

163.

Kitchin, R.: Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society. 1, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.

164.

Strathern, M.: Partial connections. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA (2004).

165.

Strathern, M.: Environments within: An ethnographic commentary on scale. In: Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997. pp. 44–71. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).

166.

Strathern, M.: On Space and Depth. In: Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices. Duke University Press, Durham (2002).

167.

Marr, B.: The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data, http://data-informed.com/.

168.

Marcus, G.: Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue. In: Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology. pp. 28–46. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex (2010).

169.

Couldry, N., Powell, A.: Big Data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society. 1, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277.

170.

Lash, S.: Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation? Theory, Culture & Society. 24, 55–78 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075956.

171.

Bowker, G.C.: The Theory/Data Thing. International Journal of Communication. 8, (2014).

172.

Beer, D., Burrows, R.: Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data. Theory, Culture & Society. 30, 47–71 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413476542.

173.

Riles, A.: The network inside out: Annelise Riles. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2001).

174.

Wendy F. Hsu: Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In ‘The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography’ eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge. (2016). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673974.ch4.

175.

Seaver, N.: Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society. 4, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104.

176.

Mackenzie, A.: These Things Called Systems. Social Studies of Science. 33, 365–387 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333003.

177.

Candea, M.: Arbitrary locations: in defence of the bounded field-site. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 13, 167–184 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x.

178.

Marcus, G.E.: Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology. 24, 95–117 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.

179.

Boellstorff, T.: Rethinking Digital Anthropology. In: Digital anthropology. Berg, London (2012).

180.

Jackson Jr., J.L.: Ethnography is, ethnography ain’t. Cultural Anthropology. 27, 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01155.x.

181.

Strathern, M.: Chapter 1. In: Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things. Athlone, London (1999).

182.

Kelty, C., Coleman, G., Strassler, K.: Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection, http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection.

183.

George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro: The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition. Cultural Anthropology. 23, 1–14 (2008).

184.

MARCUS, G.E.: THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch. Cultural Anthropology. 27, 427–445 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01152.x.

185.

Marilyn Strathern: Virtual society? Get real! Ashridge 4–5 May 2000: Conference of the ‘Virtual Society?: the Social Science of Electronic Technologies’ Programme: Abstraction and decontextualisation: an anthropological comment. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology. 22, 52–66 (2001).

186.

Strathern, M.: The Limits of Auto-anthropology. In: Anthropology at home. pp. 16–37. Tavistock Publications, London (1987).

187.

Underberg, N.M., Zorn, E.: Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography. Visual Anthropology. 26, 1–17 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2013.734760.

188.

Faubion, J.D., Marcus, G.E.: Fieldwork is not what it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2009).

189.

Marres, N., Weltevrede, E.: Scraping the social? Journal of Cultural Economy. 6, 313–335 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070.

190.

Blok, A., Pedersen, M.A.: Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world. Big Data & Society. 1, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714543908.

191.

Anderson, K., Nafus, D., Rattenbury, T., Aipperspach, R.: Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. 2009, 123–140 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x.

192.

Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium, https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7.

193.

Mike Savage and Roger Burrows: The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. Sociology. 41, 885–899 (2007).

194.

Nafus, D.: Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC, https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/.

195.

Ruppert, E., Law, J., Savage, M.: Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 30, 22–46 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941.

196.

Ford, H.: Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data & Society. 1, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714544337.

197.

» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST, https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/.

198.

Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab, http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/.