Baber, C., & Butler, M. (2012). Expertise in crime scene examination: Comparing search strategies of expert and novice crime scene examiners in simulated crime scenes. Human Factors, 54(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812440577
Brayley-Morris, H., Sorrell, A., Revoir, A. P., Meakin, G. E., Court, D. S., & Morgan, R. M. (2015). Persistence of DNA from laundered semen stains: Implications for child sex trafficking cases. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 19, 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.07.016
Channel 4 News. (2018). Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54
College of Policing: Managing Investigations. (n.d.). https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/investigations/managing-investigations/
Criminal Procedure Rules-2015-part-19.pdf. (n.d.). http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/criminal/docs/2015/crim-proc-rules-2015-part-19.pdf
Dror, I. E., Charlton, D., & Péron, A. E. (2006). Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Science International, 156(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017
ENFSI Scenes of Crime Examination Best Practice Manual. (n.d.). http://library.college.police.uk/docs/appref/ENFSI-BPM-v1_0.pdf
Forensic Science Regulator Annual Report 2015. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/482248/2015_FSR_Annual_Report_v1_0_final.pdf
Forensic Science Regulator Annual Report 2016. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/581653/FSR_Annual_Report_v1.0.pdf
Forensic Science Regulator Guidance: Cognitive Bias Effects Relevant to Forensic Science Examinations. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/510147/217_FSR-G-217_Cognitive_bias_appendix.pdf
Forensic Science Regulator Guidance: The Control and Avoidance of Contamination In Crime Scene Examination involving DNA Evidence Recovery. (n.d.). Forensic Science Regulator. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/393866/206_FSR_SOC_contamination_consultation.pdf
G. N. Rutty. (2003). The effectiveness of protective clothing in the reduction of potential DNA contamination of the scene of crime. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 117(3), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-002-0348-1
Goray, M., van Oorschot, R. A. H., & Mitchell, J. R. (2012). DNA transfer within forensic exhibit packaging: Potential for DNA loss and relocation. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 6(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.03.013
Guide to Coroner Services. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/363879/guide-to-coroner-service.pdf
Harbison, S., & Fleming, R. (2016). Forensic body fluid identification: state of the art. Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRFMS.S57994
Kanokwongnuwut, P., Kirkbride, K. P., & Linacre, A. (2018). Detection of latent DNA. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 37, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.004
Margiotta, G., Tasselli, G., Tommolini, F., Lancia, M., Massetti, S., & Carnevali, E. (2015). Risk of DNA transfer by gloves in forensic casework. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, 5, e527–e529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.208
Morgan, R. M., French, J. C., O’Donnell, L., & Bull, P. A. (2010). The reincorporation and redistribution of trace geoforensic particulates on clothing: An introductory study. Science & Justice, 50(4), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2010.04.002
O’Sullivan, S., Geddes, T., & Lovelock, T. J. (2011). The migration of fragments of glass from the pockets to the surfaces of clothing. Forensic Science International, 208(1–3), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.11.020
Pang, B. C. M., & Cheung, B. K. K. (2007). Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence. Legal Medicine, 9(4), 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2006.12.003
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). (n.d.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KoLnIwoZKU&feature=youtu.be
Poy, A., & van Oorschot, R. A. H. (2006). Beware; gloves and equipment used during the examination of exhibits are potential vectors for transfer of DNA-containing material. International Congress Series, 1288, 556–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.09.126
Processing a Crime Scene. (25 C.E.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur1GxXZGnNI
Proff, C., Schmitt, C., Schneider, P. M., Foerster, G., & Rothschild, M. A. (2006). Experiments on the DNA contamination risk via latent fingerprint brushes. International Congress Series, 1288, 601–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.10.053
Tobias, S. H. A., Jacques, G. S., Morgan, R. M., & Meakin, G. E. (2017). The effect of pressure on DNA deposition by touch. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, 6, e12–e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.020
van den Eeden, C. A. J., de Poot, C. J., & van Koppen, P. J. (2016). Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information. Science & Justice, 56(6), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2016.08.003
van Oorschot, R., Treadwell, S., Beaurepaire, J., Holding, N., & Mitchell, R. (2005). Beware of the Possibility of Fingerprinting Techniques Transferring DNA. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50, 1417–1422. https://compass.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/JFS/PAGES/JFS2004430.htm
Why is evidence continuity and integrity so important? R v Sean Hoey, 2007. (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/nie/cases/NICC/2007/49.html&query=sean+and+hoey&method=boolean
Wood, I., Park, S., Tooke, J., Smith, O., Morgan, R. M., & Meakin, G. E. (2017). Efficiencies of recovery and extraction of trace DNA from non-porous surfaces. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, 6, e153–e155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.022
