1
Guide to Coroner Services. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/363879/guide-to-coroner-service.pdf
2
College of Policing: Managing Investigations. https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/investigations/managing-investigations/
3
Forensic Science Regulator Annual Report 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/482248/2015_FSR_Annual_Report_v1_0_final.pdf
4
Forensic Science Regulator Annual Report 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/581653/FSR_Annual_Report_v1.0.pdf
5
Forensic Science Regulator Guidance: The Control and Avoidance of Contamination In Crime Scene Examination involving DNA Evidence Recovery. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/393866/206_FSR_SOC_contamination_consultation.pdf
6
Processing a Crime Scene. 25AD.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur1GxXZGnNI
7
Baber C, Butler M. Expertise in crime scene examination: Comparing search strategies of expert and novice crime scene examiners in simulated crime scenes. Human Factors 2012;54:413–24. doi:10.1177/0018720812440577
8
van den Eeden CAJ, de Poot CJ, van Koppen PJ. Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information. Science & Justice 2016;56:475–81. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2016.08.003
9
Forensic Science Regulator Guidance: Cognitive Bias Effects Relevant to Forensic Science Examinations. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/510147/217_FSR-G-217_Cognitive_bias_appendix.pdf
10
Poy A, van Oorschot RAH. Beware; gloves and equipment used during the examination of exhibits are potential vectors for transfer of DNA-containing material. International Congress Series 2006;1288:556–8. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2005.09.126
11
Proff C, Schmitt C, Schneider PM, et al. Experiments on the DNA contamination risk via latent fingerprint brushes. International Congress Series 2006;1288:601–3. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2005.10.053
12
van Oorschot R, Treadwell S, Beaurepaire J, et al. Beware of the Possibility of Fingerprinting Techniques Transferring DNA. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2005;50:1417–22.https://compass.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/JFS/PAGES/JFS2004430.htm
13
O’Sullivan S, Geddes T, Lovelock TJ. The migration of fragments of glass from the pockets to the surfaces of clothing. Forensic Science International 2011;208:149–55. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.11.020
14
Morgan RM, French JC, O’Donnell L, et al. The reincorporation and redistribution of trace geoforensic particulates on clothing: An introductory study. Science & Justice 2010;50:195–9. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2010.04.002
15
Goray M, van Oorschot RAH, Mitchell JR. DNA transfer within forensic exhibit packaging: Potential for DNA loss and relocation. Forensic Science International: Genetics 2012;6:158–66. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.03.013
16
ENFSI Scenes of Crime Examination Best Practice Manual. http://library.college.police.uk/docs/appref/ENFSI-BPM-v1_0.pdf
17
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KoLnIwoZKU&feature=youtu.be
18
G. N. Rutty. The effectiveness of protective clothing in the reduction of potential DNA contamination of the scene of crime. International Journal of Legal Medicine 2003;117:170–4. doi:10.1007/s00414-002-0348-1
19
Margiotta G, Tasselli G, Tommolini F, et al. Risk of DNA transfer by gloves in forensic casework. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2015;5:e527–9. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.208
20
Harbison S, Fleming R. Forensic body fluid identification: state of the art. Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science Published Online First: February 2016. doi:10.2147/RRFMS.S57994
21
Kanokwongnuwut P, Kirkbride KP, Linacre A. Detection of latent DNA. Forensic Science International: Genetics 2018;37:95–101. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.004
22
Tobias SHA, Jacques GS, Morgan RM, et al. The effect of pressure on DNA deposition by touch. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2017;6:e12–4. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.020
23
Brayley-Morris H, Sorrell A, Revoir AP, et al. Persistence of DNA from laundered semen stains: Implications for child sex trafficking cases. Forensic Science International: Genetics 2015;19:165–71. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.07.016
24
Wood I, Park S, Tooke J, et al. Efficiencies of recovery and extraction of trace DNA from non-porous surfaces. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2017;6:e153–5. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.022
25
Pang BCM, Cheung BKK. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence. Legal Medicine 2007;9:181–4. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2006.12.003
26
Dror IE, Charlton D, Péron AE. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Science International 2006;156:74–8. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017
27
Criminal Procedure Rules-2015-part-19.pdf. http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/criminal/docs/2015/crim-proc-rules-2015-part-19.pdf
28
Channel 4 News. Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism - YouTube. 2018.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54
29
Why is evidence continuity and integrity so important? R v Sean Hoey, 2007. http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/nie/cases/NICC/2007/49.html&query=sean+and+hoey&method=boolean
