[1]
‘Guide to Coroner Services’. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/363879/guide-to-coroner-service.pdf
[2]
‘College of Policing: Managing Investigations’. [Online]. Available: https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/investigations/managing-investigations/
[3]
‘Forensic Science Regulator Annual Report 2015’. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/482248/2015_FSR_Annual_Report_v1_0_final.pdf
[4]
‘Forensic Science Regulator Annual Report 2016’. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/581653/FSR_Annual_Report_v1.0.pdf
[5]
‘Forensic Science Regulator Guidance: The Control and Avoidance of Contamination In Crime Scene Examination involving DNA Evidence Recovery’. Forensic Science Regulator [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/393866/206_FSR_SOC_contamination_consultation.pdf
[6]
‘Processing a Crime Scene’. 25AD [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur1GxXZGnNI
[7]
C. Baber and M. Butler, ‘Expertise in crime scene examination: Comparing search strategies of expert and novice crime scene examiners in simulated crime scenes’, Human Factors, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 413–424, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0018720812440577.
[8]
C. A. J. van den Eeden, C. J. de Poot, and P. J. van Koppen, ‘Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information’, Science & Justice, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 475–481, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2016.08.003.
[9]
‘Forensic Science Regulator Guidance: Cognitive Bias Effects Relevant to Forensic Science Examinations’. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/510147/217_FSR-G-217_Cognitive_bias_appendix.pdf
[10]
A. Poy and R. A. H. van Oorschot, ‘Beware; gloves and equipment used during the examination of exhibits are potential vectors for transfer of DNA-containing material’, International Congress Series, vol. 1288, pp. 556–558, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2005.09.126.
[11]
C. Proff, C. Schmitt, P. M. Schneider, G. Foerster, and M. A. Rothschild, ‘Experiments on the DNA contamination risk via latent fingerprint brushes’, International Congress Series, vol. 1288, pp. 601–603, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2005.10.053.
[12]
R. van Oorschot, S. Treadwell, J. Beaurepaire, N. Holding, and R. Mitchell, ‘Beware of the Possibility of Fingerprinting Techniques Transferring DNA’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 50, pp. 1417–1422, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://compass.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/JFS/PAGES/JFS2004430.htm
[13]
S. O’Sullivan, T. Geddes, and T. J. Lovelock, ‘The migration of fragments of glass from the pockets to the surfaces of clothing’, Forensic Science International, vol. 208, no. 1–3, pp. 149–155, May 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.11.020.
[14]
R. M. Morgan, J. C. French, L. O’Donnell, and P. A. Bull, ‘The reincorporation and redistribution of trace geoforensic particulates on clothing: An introductory study’, Science & Justice, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 195–199, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2010.04.002.
[15]
M. Goray, R. A. H. van Oorschot, and J. R. Mitchell, ‘DNA transfer within forensic exhibit packaging: Potential for DNA loss and relocation’, Forensic Science International: Genetics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 158–166, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.03.013.
[16]
‘ENFSI Scenes of Crime Examination Best Practice Manual’. [Online]. Available: http://library.college.police.uk/docs/appref/ENFSI-BPM-v1_0.pdf
[17]
‘Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)’. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KoLnIwoZKU&feature=youtu.be
[18]
G. N. Rutty, ‘The effectiveness of protective clothing in the reduction of potential DNA contamination of the scene of crime’, International Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 170–174, 2003, doi: 10.1007/s00414-002-0348-1. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00414-002-0348-1
[19]
G. Margiotta, G. Tasselli, F. Tommolini, M. Lancia, S. Massetti, and E. Carnevali, ‘Risk of DNA transfer by gloves in forensic casework’, Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, vol. 5, pp. e527–e529, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.208.
[20]
S. Harbison and R. Fleming, ‘Forensic body fluid identification: state of the art’, Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.2147/RRFMS.S57994.
[21]
P. Kanokwongnuwut, K. P. Kirkbride, and A. Linacre, ‘Detection of latent DNA’, Forensic Science International: Genetics, vol. 37, pp. 95–101, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.004.
[22]
S. H. A. Tobias, G. S. Jacques, R. M. Morgan, and G. E. Meakin, ‘The effect of pressure on DNA deposition by touch’, Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, vol. 6, pp. e12–e14, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.020.
[23]
H. Brayley-Morris, A. Sorrell, A. P. Revoir, G. E. Meakin, D. S. Court, and R. M. Morgan, ‘Persistence of DNA from laundered semen stains: Implications for child sex trafficking cases’, Forensic Science International: Genetics, vol. 19, pp. 165–171, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.07.016.
[24]
I. Wood, S. Park, J. Tooke, O. Smith, R. M. Morgan, and G. E. Meakin, ‘Efficiencies of recovery and extraction of trace DNA from non-porous surfaces’, Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, vol. 6, pp. e153–e155, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.022.
[25]
B. C. M. Pang and B. K. K. Cheung, ‘Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence’, Legal Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 181–184, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2006.12.003.
[26]
I. E. Dror, D. Charlton, and A. E. Péron, ‘Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications’, Forensic Science International, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 74–78, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017.
[27]
‘Criminal Procedure Rules-2015-part-19.pdf’. [Online]. Available: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/criminal/docs/2015/crim-proc-rules-2015-part-19.pdf
[28]
Channel 4 News, ‘Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism - YouTube’. 2018 [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54
[29]
‘Why is evidence continuity and integrity so important? R v Sean Hoey, 2007’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/nie/cases/NICC/2007/49.html&query=sean+and+hoey&method=boolean