[1]
Abidin, C. 2016. "Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity. Social Media + Society. 2, 2 (Apr. 2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342.
[2]
Abidin, C. 2017. #familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labor. Social Media + Society. 3, 2 (Apr. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707191.
[3]
Adi Kuntsman and Rebecca L. Stein 2019. Anatomy of a Facebook Scandal: Social Media as Alibi. Digital Militarism: Israel’s Occupation in the Social Media Age. Stanford University Press. 39–54.
[4]
Adi Kuntsman, Rebecca L. Stein 2015. Palestinians Who Never Die: The Politics of Digital Suspicion. Digital Militarism: Israel’s Occupation in the Social Media Age. Stanford University Press. 55–70.
[5]
Ahmed, Sara 2004. Affective Economies. Social Text. 22, 2 (2004), 117–139.
[6]
Alper, M. 2014. War on Instagram: Framing conflict photojournalism with mobile photography apps. New Media & Society. 16, 8 (Dec. 2014), 1233–1248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813504265.
[7]
Annette Markham 2016. Remix cultures, Remix Methods: Reframing Qualitative Inquiry for Social Media Contexts. Global Dimensions of Qualitative Inquiry. Norman K. Denzin, Michael D. Giardina, ed. Routledge. 63–82.
[8]
Baym, N.K. 2015. Connect With Your Audience! The Relational Labor of Connection. The Communication Review. 18, 1 (Jan. 2015), 14–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.996401.
[9]
Baym, N.K. 2010. Personal connections in the digital age. Polity.
[10]
Bell, S. and Coleman, S. 1999. The anthropology of friendship. Berg.
[11]
Bloch, M. A well-disposed social anthropologist’s problems with memes.
[12]
Bolter, J.D. and Grusin, R.A. 1999. Remediation: understanding new media. MIT Press.
[13]
Bonilla, Y. and Rosa, J. 2015. #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist. 42, 1 (Feb. 2015), 4–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12112.
[14]
Bourdieu, P. and Nice, R. 1990. Structures, Habitus, Practices. The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press. 52–65.
[15]
Boyer, Dominic 2012. From Media Anthropology to the Anthropology of Mediation. The SAGE handbook of social anthropology. R. Fardon et al., eds. SAGE. 411–422.
[16]
Bräuchler, B. and Postill, J. 2010. Theorising media and practice. Berghahn Books.
[17]
Bucher, T. 2017. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society. 20, 1 (Jan. 2017), 30–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086.
[18]
Bucher, T. 2012. Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society. 14, 7 (Nov. 2012), 1164–1180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159.
[19]
Cabañes, J.V.A. 2018. Information and communication technologies and migrant intimacies: the case of Punjabi youth in Manila. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. (Mar. 2018), 1–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1453790.
[20]
Chakraborty, K. 2012. Virtual mate-seeking in the urban slums of Kolkata, India. South Asian Popular Culture. 10, 2 (Jul. 2012), 197–216. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2012.682871.
[21]
Clifford, J. et al. 1986. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.
[22]
Coates, J. 2017. So ‘Hot’ Right Now Reflections on Virality and Sociality from Transnational Digital China. Digital Culture & Society. 3, 2 (Dec. 2017), 77–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2017-0206.
[23]
Context Collapse: http://mediatedcultures.net/youtube/context-collapse/.
[24]
Costa, E. 2018. Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society. 20, 10 (Oct. 2018), 3641–3656. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818756290.
[25]
Costa, E. 2016. Social media in southeast Turkey: love, kinship and politics. UCL Press.
[26]
Costa, E. 2016. Social media in southeast Turkey: love, kinship and politics. UCL Press.
[27]
Daniel, Miller Photography in the Age of Snapchat. Anthropology & photography. 1.
[28]
David, G. and Cambre, C. 2016. Screened Intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic. Social Media + Society. 2, 2 (Apr. 2016), 1–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641976.
[29]
Desai, A. and Killick, E. 2010. The ways of friendship: anthropological perspectives. Berghahn Books.
[30]
Dijck, J. van 2013. The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
[31]
Dominic Pettman 2016. Hypermodulation (or the Digital Mood Ring). Infinite Distraction. Polity Press. 31–48.
[32]
Dominic Pettman 2016. Slaves to the Algorithm. Infinite distraction. Polity Press. 79–97.
[33]
Dumont, Guillaume 2017. Relational Labor, Fans and Collaborations in Professional Rock Climbing. The Routledge companion to digital ethnography. L. Hjorth, ed. Routledge. 121–131.
[34]
Ellison, N.B. and Boyd, D.M. 2013. Sociality Through Social Network Sites. 1, (Mar. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008.
[35]
Franz Boas 1937. The Diffusion of Cultural Traits. Social Research. 4, 3 (1937), 286–295.
[36]
Gagné, M. 2012. Queer Beirut Online: The Participation of Men in Gayromeo.com. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies. 8, 3 (2012), 113–137.
[37]
Goffman, E. 1990. The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin.
[38]
Haynes, N. 2016. Social media in northern Chile: posting the extraordinarily ordinary. UCL Press.
[39]
Hochschild, A.R. 2003. The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
[40]
Hogan, B. 2010. The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 30, 6 (Dec. 2010), 377–386. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893.
[41]
Horst, H. and Miller, D. 2012. Normativity and Materiality: A View from Digital Anthropology. Media International Australia. 145, 1 (Nov. 2012), 103–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500112.
[42]
Horst, H.A. 2009. Aesthetics of the self: Digital Mediations. Anthropology and the individual: a material culture perspective. Berg. 99–114.
[43]
Humphrey, C. 2009. The Mask and the Face: Imagination and Social Life in Russian Chat Rooms and Beyond. Ethnos. 74, 1 (Mar. 2009), 31–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840902751154.
[44]
Ilana Gershon 2010. The Breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over New Media. Cornell University Press; 1 edition (February 7, 2012).
[45]
Jane, E.A. 2017. Feminist Digilante Responses to a Slut-Shaming on Facebook. Social Media + Society. 3, 2 (Apr. 2017), 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117705996.
[46]
Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
[47]
Kaya, Laura Pearl 2009. Dating in a Sexually Segregated Society: Embodied Practices of Online Romance in Irbid, Jordan. Anthropological Quarterly. 82, 1 (2009), 251–278.
[48]
Kraemer, J. 2016. Doing Fieldwork, BRB: Locating the Field on and with Emerging Media. eFieldnotes: the makings of anthropology in the digital world. R. Sanjek and S.W. Tratner, eds. University of Pennsylvania Press. 113–131.
[49]
Kraemer, J. 2014. Friend or Freund: Social Media and Transnational Connections in Berlin. Human–Computer Interaction. 29, 1 (Jan. 2014), 53–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2013.823821.
[50]
Krüger, S. and Charlotte Spilde, A. 2019. Judging books by their covers – Tinder interface, usage and sociocultural implications. Information, Communication & Society. (Feb. 2019), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1572771.
[51]
Latham, A. 1999. The Power of Distraction: Distraction, Tactility, and Habit in the Work of Walter Benjamin. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 17, 4 (Aug. 1999), 451–473. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/d170451.
[52]
Lee, Benjamin and LiPuma, Edward 2002. Cultures of Circulation: The Imaginations of Modernity. Public Culture. 14, 1 (2002), 191–213.
[53]
Lee, R.L.M. 2017. Do online crowds really exist? Proximity, connectivity and collectivity. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. 18, 1 (Jan. 2017), 82–94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2016.1218903.
[54]
Literat, I. and van den Berg, S. 2019. Buy memes low, sell memes high: vernacular criticism and collective negotiations of value on Reddit’s MemeEconomy. Information, Communication & Society. 22, 2 (Jan. 2019), 232–249. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366540.
[55]
Lowrie, I. 2018. Algorithms and Automation: An Introduction. Cultural Anthropology. 33, 3 (Aug. 2018), 349–359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.3.01.
[56]
Luehrmann, S. 2004. Mediated marriage: internet matchmaking in provincial Russia. Europe-Asia Studies. 56, 6 (Sep. 2004), 857–875. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0966813042000258079.
[57]
Madianou, M. 2016. Ambient co-presence: transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks. 16, 2 (Apr. 2016), 183–201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12105.
[58]
Madianou, M. 2015. Digital Inequality and Second-Order Disasters: Social Media in the Typhoon Haiyan Recovery. Social Media + Society. 1, 2 (Sep. 2015), 1–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603386.
[59]
Madianou, M. and Miller, D. 2013. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Routledge.
[60]
Magalhães, J.C. 2018. Do Algorithms Shape Character? Considering Algorithmic Ethical Subjectivation. Social Media + Society. 4, 2 (Apr. 2018), 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768301.
[61]
Marcus, G.E. 1990. The Modernist Sensibility in Recent Ethnographic Writing and the Cinematic Metaphor of Montage. Society for Visual Anthropology Review. 6, 1 (Mar. 1990), 2–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/var.1990.6.1.2.
[62]
Marcus, O.R. and Singer, M. 2017. Loving Ebola-chan: Internet memes in an epidemic. Media, Culture & Society. 39, 3 (Apr. 2017), 341–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716646174.
[63]
Marilyn Strathern 1992. Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world. Conceptualizing Society. Taylor & Francis Group. 75–104.
[64]
Marwick, A.E. 2015. Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy. Public Culture. 27, 1 75 (Jan. 2015), 137–160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379.
[65]
Marwick, A.E. and Boyd, D. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society. 13, 1 (Feb. 2011), 114–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.
[66]
Mason, C.L. 2016. Tinder and humanitarian hook-ups: the erotics of social media racism. Feminist Media Studies. 16, 5 (Sep. 2016), 822–837. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1137339.
[67]
Mazzarella, W. 2004. Culture, Globalization, Mediation. Annual Review of Anthropology. 33, 1 (Oct. 2004), 345–367. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143809.
[68]
Mazzarella, W. 2010. The Myth of the Multitude, or, Who’s Afraid of the Crowd? Critical Inquiry. 36, 4 (Jun. 2010), 697–727. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/655209.
[69]
McDonald, T. 2016. Social media in rural China: social networks and moral frameworks. UCL Press.
[70]
McDonald, T. 2018. Strangership and Social Media: Moral Imaginaries of Gendered Strangers in Rural China. American Anthropologist. (Nov. 2018), 1–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13152.
[71]
McKay, D. 2010. On the Face of Facebook: Historical Images and Personhood in Filipino Social Networking. History and Anthropology. 21, 4 (Dec. 2010), 479–498. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2010.522311.
[72]
McManus, J. 2018. Modern Enchantments: Media, Fandom and Distraction Amongst Diaspora Turkish Football Supporters. Ethnos. 83, 4 (Aug. 2018), 762–781. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2017.1341424.
[73]
Miguel, Cristina 2018. Social Media Platforms as Intimacy Mediators. Personal Relationships and Intimacy in the Age of Social Media. Springer International Publishing. 59–80.
[74]
Miller, D. et al. 2016. Academic studies of social media. How the World Changed Social Media. UCL Press. 9–24.
[75]
Miller, D. et al. 2016. How the world changed social media. UCL Press.
[76]
Miller, D. et al. 2016. Online and offline relationships. How the World Changed Social Media. UCL Press. 100–113.
[77]
Miller, D. 2016. Social media in an English village, or, How to keep people at just the right distance. UCL Press.
[78]
Miller, D. 2011. Tales from Facebook. Polity.
[79]
Miller, D. 2017. The ideology of friendship in the era of Facebook. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 7, 1 (Mar. 2017), 377–395. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.025.
[80]
Miller, D. et al. 2016. What is social media? How the World Changed Social Media. UCL Press. 1–8.
[81]
Miller, D. and Sinanan, J. 2017. Visualising Facebook: a comparative perspective. UCL Press.
[82]
Nicolescu, R. 2016. Social media in southeast Italy: crafting ideals. UCL Press.
[83]
Nicolescu, R. 2016. Social media in southeast Italy: crafting ideals. UCL Press.
[84]
Papacharissi, Z. 2010. A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. Routledge.
[85]
Papacharissi, Zizi and Easton, Emily 2012. In the Habitus of the New. A companion to new media dynamics. John Wiley & Sons. 167–184.
[86]
Papailias, P. 2018. (Un)seeing dead refugee bodies: mourning memes, spectropolitics, and the haunting of Europe. Media, Culture & Society. (Feb. 2018), 1–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718756178.
[87]
Pink, S. et al. 2018. Data anxieties: Finding trust in everyday digital mess. Big Data & Society. 5, 1 (Jun. 2018), 1–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756685.
[88]
Postill, J. 2014. Democracy in an age of viral reality: A media epidemiography of Spain’s indignados movement. Ethnography. 15, 1 (Mar. 2014), 51–69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138113502513.
[89]
Postill, J. 2008. Localizing the internet beyond communities and networks. New Media & Society. 10, 3 (Jun. 2008), 413–431. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089416.
[90]
Postill, J. 2018. Populism and social media: a global perspective. Media, Culture & Society. 40, 5 (Jul. 2018), 754–765. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772186.
[91]
Postill, J. and Pink, S. 2012. Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web. Media International Australia. 145, 1 (Nov. 2012), 123–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114.
[92]
Roger Sanjek, Susan W. Tratner, 2016. eFieldnotes. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[93]
Sahlins, M. 2011. What kinship is (part one). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 17, 1 (Mar. 2011), 2–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01666.x.
[94]
Sampson, T.D. 2012. Virality: Contagion Theory in the Age of Networks. University of Minnesota Press.
[95]
Sanjek, R. and Tratner, S.W. eds. 2016. eFieldnotes: the makings of anthropology in the digital world. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[96]
Seaver, N. 2017. Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society. 4, 2 (Dec. 2017), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104.
[97]
Senft, T.M. and Baym, N.K. 2015. What Does the Selfie Say? Investigating a Global Phenomenon. International Journal of Communication. 9, (2015), 1588–1606.
[98]
Shakhsari, S. 2011. Weblogistan goes to war: representational practices, gendered soldiers and neoliberal entrepreneurship in diaspora. Feminist Review. 99, 1 (Nov. 2011), 6–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2011.35.
[99]
Simmel, G. and Wolff, K.H. 1950. The Stranger. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Free Press.
[100]
Sinanan, J. 2017. Social media in Trinidad: values and visibility. UCL Press.
[101]
Sinanan, J. and Hosein, G.J. 2017. Non-Activism: Political Engagement and Facebook Through Ethnography in Trinidad. Social Media + Society. 3, 3 (Jul. 2017), 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117719627.
[102]
Spyer, J. 2017. Social media in emergent Brazil: how the internet affects social change. UCL Press.
[103]
Standage, T. 2013. Writing on the wall: social media : the first 2,000 years. Bloomsbury.
[104]
Stark, L. and Crawford, K. 2015. The Conservatism of Emoji: Work, Affect, and Communication. Social Media + Society. 1, 2 (Sep. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604853.
[105]
Steel, G. 2017. Navigating (im)mobility: female entrepreneurship and social media in Khartoum. Africa. 87, 02 (May 2017), 233–252. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972016000930.
[106]
Sumiala, J. and Tikka, M. 2011. Imagining globalised fears: school shooting videos and circulation of violence on YouTube. Social Anthropology. 19, 3 (Aug. 2011), 254–267. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00158.x.
[107]
Tarde, G. and Clark, T.N. 1969. On communication and social influence: selected papers. University of Chicago Press.
[108]
Taussig, M.T. 1993. Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses. Routledge.
[109]
Thumim, N. 2012. Self-Representation and Digital Culture. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[110]
Udupa, S. 2018. Gaali cultures: The politics of abusive exchange on social media. New Media & Society. 20, 4 (Apr. 2018), 1506–1522. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698776.
[111]
Valaskivi, K. and Sumiala, J. 2014. Circulating social imaginaries: Theoretical and methodological reflections. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 17, 3 (Jun. 2014), 229–243. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413508741.
[112]
Venkatraman, S. 2017. Social media in south India. UCL Press.
[113]
Venkatraman, Shriram 2017. Bringing Home to Work: The Role of Social Media in Blurring Work-Non-Work Boundaries. Social media in south India. UCL Press. 136–168.
[114]
Vonderau, A. 2018. Scaling the Cloud: Making State and Infrastructure in Sweden. Ethnos. (May 2018), 1–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2018.1471513.
[115]
Wall, M. et al. 2017. Syrian refugees and information precarity. New Media & Society. 19, 2 (Feb. 2017), 240–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815591967.
[116]
Waltorp, Karen 2016. A Snapchat essay on mutuality, utopia and non-innocent conversations. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford. 8, 2 (2016), 251–273.
[117]
Wang, X. 2016. The social media landscape in China. UCL Press.
[118]
Win, T.S. 2014. Marketing the Entrepreneurial Artist in the Innovation Age: Aesthetic Labor, Artistic Subjectivity, and the Creative Industries. Anthropology of Work Review. 35, 1 (Jul. 2014), 2–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/awr.12026.