1
Miller D, Costa E, Haynes N, et al. How the world changed social media. London: : UCL Press 2016. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1474805/
2
Miller D. Social media in an English village, or, How to keep people at just the right distance. London: : UCL Press 2016. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1474804/
3
Costa E. Social media in southeast Turkey: love, kinship and politics. London: : UCL Press 2016. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1474828/
4
Haynes N. Social media in northern Chile: posting the extraordinarily ordinary. London: : UCL Press 2016. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1495966/
5
Wang X. The social media landscape in China. London: : UCL Press 2016. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1514478/
6
McDonald T. Social media in rural China: social networks and moral frameworks. London: : UCL Press 2016. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1514479/
7
Nicolescu R. Social media in southeast Italy: crafting ideals. London: : UCL Press 2016. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1519650/
8
Miller D, Sinanan J. Visualising Facebook: a comparative perspective. London: : UCL Press 2017. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1543315/
9
Venkatraman S. Social media in south India. London: : UCL Press 2017. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1558928/
10
Spyer J. Social media in emergent Brazil: how the internet affects social change. London: : UCL Press 2017. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10025054/
11
Sinanan J. Social media in Trinidad: values and visibility. London: : UCL Press 2017. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10037812/
12
Boyer, Dominic. From Media Anthropology to the Anthropology of Mediation. In: Fardon R, Harris O, Marchand THJ, et al., eds. The SAGE handbook of social anthropology. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2012. 411–22.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=959a9a07-f617-e911-80cd-005056af4099
13
Miller D, Costa E, Haynes N, et al. What is social media? In: How the World Changed Social Media. UCL Press 2016. 1–8. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1g69z35.8
14
Miller D, Costa E, Haynes N, et al. Academic studies of social media. In: How the World Changed Social Media. UCL Press 2016. 9–24. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1g69z35.9
15
Miller D, Costa E, Haynes N, et al. Online and offline relationships. In: How the World Changed Social Media. UCL Press 2016. 100–13. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1g69z35.14
16
Ellison NB, Boyd DM. Sociality Through Social Network Sites. 2013;1. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008
17
Postill J, Pink S. Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web. Media International Australia 2012;145:123–34. doi:10.1177/1329878X1214500114
18
Mazzarella W. Culture, Globalization, Mediation. Annual Review of Anthropology 2004;33:345–67. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143809
19
Bolter JD, Grusin RA. Remediation: understanding new media. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1999. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=9351&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_I
20
Baym NK. Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge: : Polity 2010.
21
Dijck J van. The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780199970797
22
Standage T. Writing on the wall: social media : the first 2,000 years. First U.S. edition. New York: : Bloomsbury 2013.
23
Hogan B. The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 2010;30:377–86. doi:10.1177/0270467610385893
24
Senft TM, Baym NK. What Does the Selfie Say? Investigating a Global Phenomenon. International Journal of Communication 2015;9:1588–606.https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4067/1387
25
McKay D. On the Face of Facebook: Historical Images and Personhood in Filipino Social Networking. History and Anthropology 2010;21:479–98. doi:10.1080/02757206.2010.522311
26
Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. London: : Penguin 1990.
27
Marilyn Strathern. Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world. In: Conceptualizing Society. London: : Taylor & Francis Group 1992. 75–104.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203032244
28
Horst HA. Aesthetics of the self: Digital Mediations. In: Anthropology and the individual: a material culture perspective. New York: : Berg 2009. 99–114.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781118274873
29
Humphrey C. The Mask and the Face: Imagination and Social Life in Russian Chat Rooms and Beyond. Ethnos 2009;74:31–50. doi:10.1080/00141840902751154
30
Marwick AE, Boyd D. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 2011;13:114–33. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
31
Miller D. Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: : Polity 2011. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780745673110
32
Horst H, Miller D. Normativity and Materiality: A View from Digital Anthropology. Media International Australia 2012;145:103–11. doi:10.1177/1329878X1214500112
33
Papacharissi Z. A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: : Routledge 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203876527
34
Thumim N. Self-Representation and Digital Culture. London: : Palgrave Macmillan UK 2012. doi:10.1057/9781137265135
35
Nicolescu R. Social media in southeast Italy: crafting ideals. London: : UCL Press 2016. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1519650/
36
Miller D. The ideology of friendship in the era of Facebook. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2017;7:377–95. doi:10.14318/hau7.1.025
37
Costa E. Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society 2018;20:3641–56. doi:10.1177/1461444818756290
38
Madianou M. Ambient co-presence: transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks 2016;16:183–201. doi:10.1111/glob.12105
39
Costa E. Social media in southeast Turkey: love, kinship and politics. London: : UCL Press 2016. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1474828/
40
Madianou M, Miller D. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Routledge 2013. doi:10.4324/9780203154236
41
Kraemer J. Friend or Freund: Social Media and Transnational Connections in Berlin. Human–Computer Interaction 2014;29:53–77. doi:10.1080/07370024.2013.823821
42
Wesch M. Context Collapse. http://mediatedcultures.net/youtube/context-collapse/
43
Desai A, Killick E. The ways of friendship: anthropological perspectives. New York: : Berghahn Books 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781845458508
44
Sahlins M. What kinship is (part one). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17:2–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01666.x
45
Bräuchler B, Postill J. Theorising media and practice. New York: : Berghahn Books 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781845458546
46
Bell S, Coleman S. The anthropology of friendship. Oxford: : Berg 1999.
47
McManus J. Modern Enchantments: Media, Fandom and Distraction Amongst Diaspora Turkish Football Supporters. Ethnos 2018;83:762–81. doi:10.1080/00141844.2017.1341424
48
Dominic Pettman. Hypermodulation (or the Digital Mood Ring). In: Infinite Distraction. Polity Press 2016. 31–48.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1146892&site=ehost-live&scope=site
49
Dominic Pettman. Slaves to the Algorithm. In: Infinite distraction. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2016. 79–97.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1146892&site=ehost-live&scope=site
50
Bucher T. Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society 2012;14:1164–80. doi:10.1177/1461444812440159
51
Latham A. The Power of Distraction: Distraction, Tactility, and Habit in the Work of Walter Benjamin. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 1999;17:451–73. doi:10.1068/d170451
52
Papacharissi, Zizi, Easton, Emily. In the Habitus of the New. In: A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: : John Wiley & Sons 2012. 167–84.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118321607.ch9
53
Bourdieu P, Nice R. Structures, Habitus, Practices. In: The Logic of Practice. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1990. 52–65.
54
Seaver N. Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society 2017;4:1–12. doi:10.1177/2053951717738104
55
Magalhães JC. Do Algorithms Shape Character? Considering Algorithmic Ethical Subjectivation. Social Media + Society 2018;4:1–10. doi:10.1177/2056305118768301
56
Bucher T. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 2017;20:30–44. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
57
Lowrie I. Algorithms and Automation: An Introduction. Cultural Anthropology 2018;33:349–59. doi:10.14506/ca33.3.01
58
Kraemer J. Doing Fieldwork, BRB: Locating the Field on and with Emerging Media. In: Sanjek R, Tratner SW, eds. eFieldnotes: the makings of anthropology in the digital world. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2016. 113–31.https://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9780812292213/9780812292213-008/9780812292213-008.xml
59
Annette Markham. Remix cultures, Remix Methods: Reframing Qualitative Inquiry for Social Media Contexts. In: Norman K. Denzin, Michael D. Giardina, ed. Global Dimensions of Qualitative Inquiry. Routledge 2016. 63–82. doi:10.4324/9781315428093
60
Waltorp, Karen. A Snapchat essay on mutuality, utopia and non-innocent conversations. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 2016;8:251–73.https://www.anthro.ox.ac.uk/jasoonline-2016
61
Clifford J, Marcus GE, School of American Research (Santa Fe, N.M.). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 1986.
62
Marcus GE. The Modernist Sensibility in Recent Ethnographic Writing and the Cinematic Metaphor of Montage. Society for Visual Anthropology Review 1990;6:2–12. doi:10.1525/var.1990.6.1.2
63
Sanjek R, Tratner SW, editors. eFieldnotes: the makings of anthropology in the digital world. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2016.
64
Roger Sanjek, Susan W. Tratner,. eFieldnotes. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2016. https://www.degruyter.com/viewbooktoc/product/457964
65
Postill J. Localizing the internet beyond communities and networks. New Media & Society 2008;10:413–31. doi:10.1177/1461444808089416
66
Vonderau A. Scaling the Cloud: Making State and Infrastructure in Sweden. Ethnos 2018;:1–21. doi:10.1080/00141844.2018.1471513
67
Daniel, Miller. Photography in the Age of Snapchat. Anthropology & photography;1.https://www.therai.org.uk/publications/anthropology-and-photography
68
Dumont, Guillaume. Relational Labor, Fans and Collaborations in Professional Rock Climbing. In: Hjorth L, ed. The Routledge companion to digital ethnography. New York, New York: : Routledge 2017. 121–31.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673974
69
Steel G. Navigating (im)mobility: female entrepreneurship and social media in Khartoum. Africa 2017;87:233–52. doi:10.1017/S0001972016000930
70
Abidin C. #familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labor. Social Media + Society 2017;3. doi:10.1177/2056305117707191
71
Venkatraman, Shriram. Bringing Home to Work: The Role of Social Media in Blurring Work-Non-Work Boundaries. In: Social media in south India. London: : UCL Press 2017. 136–68. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1qnw88r.11
72
Baym NK. Connect With Your Audience! The Relational Labor of Connection. The Communication Review 2015;18:14–22. doi:10.1080/10714421.2015.996401
73
Abidin C. "Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity. Social Media + Society 2016;2. doi:10.1177/2056305116641342
74
Marwick AE. Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy. Public Culture 2015;27:137–60. doi:10.1215/08992363-2798379
75
Win TS. Marketing the Entrepreneurial Artist in the Innovation Age: Aesthetic Labor, Artistic Subjectivity, and the Creative Industries. Anthropology of Work Review 2014;35:2–13. doi:10.1111/awr.12026
76
Hochschild AR. The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. 20th anniversary ed., with a new afterword. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2003.
77
Krüger S, Charlotte Spilde A. Judging books by their covers – Tinder interface, usage and sociocultural implications. Information, Communication & Society 2019;:1–16. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1572771
78
McDonald T. Strangership and Social Media: Moral Imaginaries of Gendered Strangers in Rural China. American Anthropologist 2018;:1–13. doi:10.1111/aman.13152
79
Chakraborty K. Virtual mate-seeking in the urban slums of Kolkata, India. South Asian Popular Culture 2012;10:197–216. doi:10.1080/14746689.2012.682871
80
David G, Cambre C. Screened Intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic. Social Media + Society 2016;2:1–11. doi:10.1177/2056305116641976
81
Luehrmann S. Mediated marriage: internet matchmaking in provincial Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 2004;56:857–75. doi:10.1080/0966813042000258079
82
Kaya, Laura Pearl. Dating in a Sexually Segregated Society: Embodied Practices of Online Romance in Irbid, Jordan. Anthropological Quarterly 2009;82:251–78.https://www.jstor.org/stable/25488265
83
Ilana Gershon. The Breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over New Media. Cornell University Press; 1 edition (February 7, 2012) 2010. http://www.amazon.com/Breakup-2-0-Disconnecting-over-Media/dp/0801477891/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1419456802&sr=1-1&keywords=breakup+2.0
84
Simmel G, Wolff KH. The Stranger. In: The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, Ill: : Free Press 1950. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3538733100004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
85
Jane EA. Feminist Digilante Responses to a Slut-Shaming on Facebook. Social Media + Society 2017;3:1–10. doi:10.1177/2056305117705996
86
Mason CL. Tinder and humanitarian hook-ups: the erotics of social media racism. Feminist Media Studies 2016;16:822–37. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1137339
87
Gagné M. Queer Beirut Online: The Participation of Men in Gayromeo.com. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 2012;8:113–37.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jmiddeastwomstud.8.3.113
88
Miguel, Cristina. Social Media Platforms as Intimacy Mediators. In: Personal Relationships and Intimacy in the Age of Social Media. Springer International Publishing 2018. 59–80.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02062-0_4
89
Cabañes JVA. Information and communication technologies and migrant intimacies: the case of Punjabi youth in Manila. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 2018;:1–17. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1453790
90
Stark L, Crawford K. The Conservatism of Emoji: Work, Affect, and Communication. Social Media + Society 2015;1. doi:10.1177/2056305115604853
91
Coates J. So ‘Hot’ Right Now Reflections on Virality and Sociality from Transnational Digital China. Digital Culture & Society 2017;3:77–98. doi:10.14361/dcs-2017-0206
92
Literat I, van den Berg S. Buy memes low, sell memes high: vernacular criticism and collective negotiations of value on Reddit’s MemeEconomy. Information, Communication & Society 2019;22:232–49. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366540
93
Ahmed, Sara. Affective Economies. Social Text 2004;22:117–39.https://muse.jhu.edu/article/55780
94
Postill J. Democracy in an age of viral reality: A media epidemiography of Spain’s indignados movement. Ethnography 2014;15:51–69. doi:10.1177/1466138113502513
95
Sampson TD. Virality: Contagion Theory in the Age of Networks. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2012. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttsp1n
96
Tarde G, Clark TN. On communication and social influence: selected papers. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1969.
97
Taussig MT. Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses. New York: : Routledge 1993.
98
Franz Boas. The Diffusion of Cultural Traits. Social Research 1937;4:286–95.https://www.jstor.org/stable/40981562?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
99
Marcus OR, Singer M. Loving Ebola-chan: Internet memes in an epidemic. Media, Culture & Society 2017;39:341–56. doi:10.1177/0163443716646174
100
Mazzarella W. The Myth of the Multitude, or, Who’s Afraid of the Crowd? Critical Inquiry 2010;36:697–727. doi:10.1086/655209
101
Lee RLM. Do online crowds really exist? Proximity, connectivity and collectivity. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 2017;18:82–94. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2016.1218903
102
Valaskivi K, Sumiala J. Circulating social imaginaries: Theoretical and methodological reflections. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2014;17:229–43. doi:10.1177/1367549413508741
103
Lee, Benjamin, LiPuma, Edward. Cultures of Circulation: The Imaginations of Modernity. Public Culture 2002;14:191–213.https://muse.jhu.edu/article/26272
104
Bloch M. A well-disposed social anthropologist’s problems with memes. https://is.muni.cz/el/1421/podzim2012/RLB356/um/Bloch__M_-_A_well-disposed_social_anthropologist_s_problems_with_memes.pdf
105
Jenkins H. Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York: : New York University Press 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.05936
106
Bonilla Y, Rosa J. #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist 2015;42:4–17. doi:10.1111/amet.12112
107
Adi Kuntsman, Rebecca L. Stein. Palestinians Who Never Die: The Politics of Digital Suspicion. In: Digital Militarism: Israel’s Occupation in the Social Media Age. Stanford University Press 2015. 55–70.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=960634&site=ehost-live&scope=site
108
Adi Kuntsman and Rebecca L. Stein. Anatomy of a Facebook Scandal: Social Media as Alibi. In: Digital Militarism: Israel’s Occupation in the Social Media Age. California: : Stanford University Press 2019. 39–54.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=960634&site=ehost-live&scope=site
109
Wall M, Otis Campbell M, Janbek D. Syrian refugees and information precarity. New Media & Society 2017;19:240–54. doi:10.1177/1461444815591967
110
Postill J. Populism and social media: a global perspective. Media, Culture & Society 2018;40:754–65. doi:10.1177/0163443718772186
111
Papailias P. (Un)seeing dead refugee bodies: mourning memes, spectropolitics, and the haunting of Europe. Media, Culture & Society 2018;:1–21. doi:10.1177/0163443718756178
112
Udupa S. Gaali cultures: The politics of abusive exchange on social media. New Media & Society 2018;20:1506–22. doi:10.1177/1461444817698776
113
Pink S, Lanzeni D, Horst H. Data anxieties: Finding trust in everyday digital mess. Big Data & Society 2018;5:1–14. doi:10.1177/2053951718756685
114
Madianou M. Digital Inequality and Second-Order Disasters: Social Media in the Typhoon Haiyan Recovery. Social Media + Society 2015;1:1–11. doi:10.1177/2056305115603386
115
Sumiala J, Tikka M. Imagining globalised fears: school shooting videos and circulation of violence on YouTube. Social Anthropology 2011;19:254–67. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00158.x
116
Sinanan J, Hosein GJ. Non-Activism: Political Engagement and Facebook Through Ethnography in Trinidad. Social Media + Society 2017;3:1–10. doi:10.1177/2056305117719627
117
Alper M. War on Instagram: Framing conflict photojournalism with mobile photography apps. New Media & Society 2014;16:1233–48. doi:10.1177/1461444813504265
118
Shakhsari S. Weblogistan goes to war: representational practices, gendered soldiers and neoliberal entrepreneurship in diaspora. Feminist Review 2011;99:6–24. doi:10.1057/fr.2011.35
