[1]
Akande, D. 2003. The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 1, 3 (Dec. 2003), 618–650. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/1.3.618.
[2]
Akhavan, P. 2009. Are International Criminal Tribunals a Disincentive to Peace?: Reconciling Judicial Romanticism with Political Realism. Human Rights Quarterly. 31, 3 (2009), 624–654. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0096.
[3]
Akhavan, P. 2008. Reconciling Crimes Against Humanity with the Laws of War: Human Rights, Armed Conflict, and the Limits of Progressive Jurisprudence. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 6, 1 (Mar. 2008), 21–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqn001.
[4]
Alexander K. A. Greenawalt 1999. Rethinking Genocidal Intent: The Case for a Knowledge-Based Interpretation. Columbia Law Review. 99, 8 (1999), 2259–2294.
[5]
Allott, Philip 2002. The health of nations: society and law beyond the state. Cambridge University Press.
[6]
Alvarez, J.E. 1999. Crimes of States/Crimes of Hate: Lessons from Rwanda. Yale Journal of International Law. 24, (1999), 365–480.
[7]
Alvarez, J.E. 1999. Crimes of States/Crimes of Hate: Lessons from Rwanda. Yale Journal of International Law. 24, 2 (1999), 365–480.
[8]
Ambos, K. 2002. Other Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[9]
Ambos, K. 2002. Superior Responsibility. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[10]
Ambos, K. 2011. The Fujimori Judgment: A President’s Responsibility for Crimes Against Humanity as Indirect Perpetrator by Virtue of an Organized Power Apparatus. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 9, 1 (Mar. 2011), 137–158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq059.
[11]
Ambos, K. 2009. What does ‘intent to destroy’ in genocide mean? International Review of the Red Cross. 91, 876 (Dec. 2009), 833–858. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383110000056.
[12]
Anthony D’Amato 1986. Superior Orders vs. Command Responsibility. The American Journal of International Law. 80, 3 (1986), 604–608.
[13]
Antonio, C. 2011. The Engister case. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.
[14]
Antonio, C. 2011. The Rochling case. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.
[15]
Aptel, C. 2012. Prosecutorial Discretion at the ICC and Victims’ Right to Remedy: Narrowing the Impunity Gap. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 5 (Dec. 2012), 1357–1375. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs077.
[16]
Badar, M.E. 2008. The Mental Element In The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court: A Commentary From A Comparative Criminal Law Perspective. Criminal Law Forum. 19, 3–4 (Dec. 2008), 473–518. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-008-9085-6.
[17]
Barriga, S. 2012. Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression. The travaux preparatoires of the crime of aggression. Cambridge University Press.
[18]
de Beco, G. 2008. War Crimes in International Versus Non-International Armed Conflicts: ‘New Wine in Old Wineskins’? International Criminal Law Review. 8, 1 (Mar. 2008), 319–329. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/156753608X265312.
[19]
Behrens, P. 2012. Genocide and the Question of Motives. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 3 (Jul. 2012), 501–523. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs038.
[20]
Benzing, M. 2003. The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online. 7, 1 (Jan. 2003), 591–628. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/138946303775160250.
[21]
BLOKKER, N. and KRESS, C. 2010. A Consensus Agreement on the Crime of Aggression: Impressions from Kampala. Leiden Journal of International Law. 23, 04 (Dec. 2010), 889–895. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156510000440.
[22]
Boas, Gideon et al. 2008. Elements of crimes under international law. Cambridge University Press.
[23]
Boas, Gideon et al. 2008. Elements of crimes under international law. Cambridge University Press.
[24]
Boas, Gideon et al. 2007. Forms of responsibility in international criminal law. Cambridge University Press.
[25]
Boas, Gideon et al. 2007. Forms of responsibility in international criminal law. Cambridge University Press.
[26]
Boister, N. and Cryer, R. 2008. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal - A Reappraisal : The Tokyo International Military Tribunal - A Reappraisal Oxford Scholarship Online.
[27]
Brownlie, I. 1963. International Law and the Use of Force by States : International Law and the Use of Force by States Oxford Scholarship Online.
[28]
Cassese, A. 2002. Justifications and Excuses in International Criminal Law. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[29]
Cassese, A. 2012. The Nexus Requirement for War Crimes. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 5 (Dec. 2012), 1395–1417. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs082.
[30]
Cassese, A. 2005. The Proper Limits of Individual Responsibility under the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 5, 1 (Nov. 2005), 109–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql091.
[31]
Cassese, Antonio 2011. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.
[32]
Cassese, Antonio 2011. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.
[33]
Cassese, Antonio 2011. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.
[34]
Cassese, Antonio et al. 2002. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[35]
Cassese, Antonio et al. 2002. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[36]
Cassese, Antonio and Cassese, Antonio 2013. Cassese’s International criminal law. Oxford University Press.
[37]
Catani, L. 2012. Victims at the International Criminal Court: Some Lessons Learned from the Lubanga Case. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 4 (Sep. 2012), 905–922. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs053.
[38]
Cécile Tournaye 2003. Genocidal Intent before the ICTY. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 52, 2 (2003), 447–462.
[39]
Chehtman, A. 2011. Developing Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Capacity to Process War Crimes Cases: Critical Notes on a ‘Success Story’. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 9, 3 (Jul. 2011), 547–570. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr024.
[40]
Clark, J.N. 2011. Peace, Justice and the International Criminal Court: Limitations and Possibilities. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 9, 3 (Jul. 2011), 521–545. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr007.
[41]
Clark, R.S. 2008. Drafting a General Part to a Penal Code: Some Thoughts Inspired by the Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and by the Court’s First Substantive Law Discussion in the Lubanga Dyilo Confirmation Proceedings. Criminal Law Forum. 19, 3–4 (Dec. 2008), 519–552. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-008-9074-9.
[42]
Clark, R.S. 2008. Drafting a General Part to a Penal Code: Some Thoughts Inspired by the Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and by the Court’s First Substantive Law Discussion in the Lubanga Dyilo Confirmation Proceedings. Criminal Law Forum. 19, 3–4 (Dec. 2008), 519–552. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-008-9074-9.
[43]
Clark, R.S. 2001. The Mental Element in International Criminal Law: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Elements of Offences. Criminal Law Forum. 12, 3 (2001), 291–334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014929127650.
[44]
Claus Kreß 2006. Versailles Nürnberg Den Haag: Deutschland und das Völkerstrafrecht. JuristenZeitung. (2006), 981–991.
[45]
CRAWFORD, E. 2007. Unequal before the Law: The Case for the Elimination of the Distinction between International and Non-international Armed Conflicts. Leiden Journal of International Law. 20, 02 (Jun. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S092215650700413X.
[46]
Crawford, J. 2009. The Work of the International Law Commission. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[47]
Cryer, R. 2005. Aggression at the Court of Appeal. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 10, 2 (Jun. 2005), 209–230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/kri012.
[48]
Cryer, R. 2010. International Criminal Law (chapter 25). International law. Oxford University Press. 752–783.
[49]
CRYER, R. 2006. Sudan, Resolution 1593, and International Criminal Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law. 19, 01 (Mar. 2006). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156505003237.
[50]
Cryer, R. 2011. Superior Scholarship on Superior Orders: An Appreciation of Yoram Dinstein’s The Defence of ‘Obedience to Superior Orders’ in International Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 9, 4 (Sep. 2011), 959–972. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr032.
[51]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[52]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[53]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[54]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[55]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[56]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[57]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[58]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[59]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[60]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[61]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[62]
Cryer, Robert 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
[63]
Cryer, Robert 2005. Prosecuting international crimes: selectivity and the international criminal law regime. Cambridge University Press.
[64]
Cryer, Robert 2005. Prosecuting international crimes: selectivity and the international criminal law regime. Cambridge University Press.
[65]
Cryer, Robert 2010. The History of International Criminal Prosecutions: Nuremberg and Toyko. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press. 109–121.
[66]
Damaška, M. 2008. What is the point of international criminal justice? Chicago-Kent Law Review. 83, 1 (2008), 329–364.
[67]
David Wippman 2006. The Costs of International Justice. The American Journal of International Law. 100, 4 (2006), 861–881.
[68]
Di Filippo, M. 2008. Terrorist Crimes and International Co-operation: Critical Remarks on the Definition and Inclusion of Terrorism in the Category of International Crimes. European Journal of International Law. 19, 3 (Jun. 2008), 533–570. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn027.
[69]
Dörmann, Knut et al. 2003. Elements of war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: sources and commentary. Cambridge University Press.
[70]
Drumbl, Mark A. 2007. Atrocity, punishment, and international law. Cambridge University Press.
[71]
Duff, A. 2010. Authority and responsibility in international criminal law. The philosophy of international law. Oxford University Press. 589–604.
[72]
Duff, A. 2013. Can we punish the perpetrators of atrocities? The religious in responses to mass atrocity: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
[73]
Ellen O’Connell, M. and Niyazmatov, M. 2012. What is Aggression?: Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 1 (Mar. 2012), 189–207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs003.
[74]
Ellen O’Connell, M. and Niyazmatov, M. 2012. What is Aggression?: Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 1 (Mar. 2012), 189–207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs003.
[75]
Esser, A. 2002. Individual Criminal Responsibility. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[76]
Esser, A. 2002. Individual Criminal Responsibility. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[77]
Fenrick, W.J. 2004. THE PROSECUTION OF UNLAWFUL ATTACK CASES BEFORE THE ICTY. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. 7, (Dec. 2004). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1389135904001539.
[78]
Fernandez de Gurmendi, S.A. 2001. The Working Group on Aggression at the Prepatory Commission for the International Criminal Court,. Fordham International Law Journal. 25, 3 (2001), 589–605.
[79]
Fichtelberg, A. 2008. Liberal Values in International Criminal Law: A Critique of Erdemovic. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 6, 1 (Mar. 2008), 3–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm026.
[80]
Fife, R.E. 2003. Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States. Human rights and criminal justice for the downtrodden: essays in honour of Asbjørn Eide. Marinus Nijhoff.
[81]
Fleck, Dieter and Bothe, Michael 2008. The handbook of international humanitarian law. Oxford University Press.
[82]
FRIMAN, H. 2009. The International Criminal Court and Participation of Victims: A Third Party to the Proceedings? Leiden Journal of International Law. 22, 03 (Sep. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509990057.
[83]
Gaeta, P. 1999. The defence of superior orders: the statute of International Criminal Court versus customary international law. European Journal of International Law. 10, 1 (Jan. 1999), 172–191. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/10.1.172.
[84]
GIOIA, F. 2006. State Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, and ‘Modern’ International Law: The Principle of Complementarity in the International Criminal Court. Leiden Journal of International Law. 19, 04 (Dec. 2006). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156506003761.
[85]
Glennon, M. 2010. Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States. Yale Journal of International Law. 35, 1 (2010), 71–114.
[86]
Goldston, J.A. 2010. More Candour about Criteria: The Exercise of Discretion by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 8, 2 (May 2010), 383–406. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq019.
[87]
Guilfoyle, D. 2012. Prosecuting Somali Pirates: A Critical Evaluation of the Options. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 4 (Sep. 2012), 767–796. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs036.
[88]
Guilfoyle, D. 2011. Responsibility for Collective Atrocities: Fair Labelling and Approaches to Commission in International Criminal Law. Current Legal Problems. 64, 1 (Jan. 2011), 255–286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cur006.
[89]
Horsington, H. 2004. The Cambodian Khmer Rouge Tribunal: The Promise of a Hybrid Tribunal. Melbourne Journal of International Law. 5, 2 (2004), 462–482.
[90]
Jorda, C. and De Hemptinne, J. 2002. The status and role of the victim. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[91]
Joyner, C. 2002. International Extradition and Global Terrorism: Bringing International Criminals to Justice. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review. 25, 3 (2002), 493–542.
[92]
Kabatsi, F. 2005. Defining or Diverting Genocide: Changing the Comportment of Genocide. International Criminal Law Review. 5, 3 (Sep. 2005), 387–400. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/1571812054940085.
[93]
KIRSCH, S. 2009. Two Kinds of Wrong: On the Context Element of Crimes against Humanity. Leiden Journal of International Law. 22, 03 (Sep. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509990070.
[94]
Koskenniemi, M. 2002. Between Impunity and Show Trials. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online. 6, 1 (Jan. 2002), 1–32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/138946302775159451.
[95]
Kress, C. 2009. The Crime of Genocide and Contextual Elements: A Comment on the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber’s Decision in the Al Bashir Case. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 7, 2 (May 2009), 297–306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqp031.
[96]
Kreß, C. 2006. The Crime of Genocide under International Law. International Criminal Law Review. 6, 4 (Nov. 2006), 461–502. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/157181206778992287.
[97]
Kress, C. 2005. The Darfur Report and Genocidal Intent. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 3, 3 (Jul. 2005), 562–578. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi054.
[98]
Kress, C. 2007. The International Court of Justice and the Elements of the Crime of Genocide. European Journal of International Law. 18, 4 (Sep. 2007), 619–629. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm039.
[99]
Kress, C. 2000. War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflicts. Israel yearbook on human rights. (2000).
[100]
Kress, C. and von Holtzendorff, L. 2010. The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 8, 5 (Nov. 2010), 1179–1217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq069.
[101]
Kutnjak Ivkovich, S. and Hagan, J. 2011. Reclaiming Justice : Reclaiming JusticeThe International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Local Courts.
[102]
Lee, Roy S. et al. 1999. The International Criminal Court: the making of the Rome Statute : issues, negotiations, results. Kluwer Law International.
[103]
Linton, S. 2001. Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: Experiments in international justice. Criminal Law Forum. 12, 2 (2001), 185–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013344422072.
[104]
Lippman, M. 1996. Conundrums of Armed Conflict: Criminal Defenses to Violate of the Humanitarian Law of War. Dickinson Journal of International Law. 15, 1 (1996), 1–111.
[105]
Luban, D. 2004. A Theory of Crimes against Humanity. Yale Journal of International Law. 29, 1 (2004), 85–168.
[106]
Luban, D. 2010. Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law. The philosophy of international law. Oxford University Press.
[107]
Macleod, C. 2010. Towards a Philosophical Account of Crimes Against Humanity. European Journal of International Law. 21, 2 (May 2010), 281–302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq031.
[108]
Matthew Happold 2007. Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga, Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court, 29 January 2007. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 56, 3 (2007), 713–724.
[109]
Mazandaran, P.A. 2006. An International Legal Response to an International Problem: Prosecuting International Terrorists. International Criminal Law Review. 6, 4 (Nov. 2006), 503–548. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/157181206778992232.
[110]
McCARGO, D. 2011. Politics by other means? The virtual trials of the Khmer Rouge tribunal. International Affairs. 87, 3 (May 2011), 613–627. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00993.x.
[111]
MÉGRET, F. 2008. A Special Tribunal for Lebanon: The UN Security Council and the Emancipation of International Criminal Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law. 21, 02 (Jun. 2008). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156508005062.
[112]
Megret, F. 2001. Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law. European Journal of International Law. 12, 2 (Apr. 2001), 247–268. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/12.2.247.
[113]
Mettraux, Guénaël 2008. Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial. Oxford University Press.
[114]
Michael P. Scharf 2001. The ICC’s Jurisdiction over the Nationals of Non-Party States: A Critique of the U.S. Position. Law and Contemporary Problems. 64, 1 (2001), 67–117.
[115]
Morss, John R. 2006. Banality of Justice: Reflections on Sierra Leone’s Special Court, The. Oregon Review of International Law. 8, (2006), 1–30.
[116]
Mose, E. 2005. Main Achievements of the ICTR. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 3, 4 (Aug. 2005), 920–943. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi068.
[117]
Murphy, S.D. 2009. Aggression, Legitimacy and the International Criminal Court. European Journal of International Law. 20, 4 (Nov. 2009), 1147–1156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp079.
[118]
Nersessian, D. 2007. Comparative Approaches to Punishing Hate: The Intersection of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity. Stanford Journal of International Law. 43, 2 (2007), 221–264.
[119]
Nouwen, S.M.H. 2012. Justifying justice. The Cambridge Companion to International Law. J. Crawford et al., eds. Cambridge University Press. 327–351.
[120]
Nouwen, S.M.H. 2012. Justifying justice. The Cambridge Companion to International Law. J. Crawford et al., eds. Cambridge University Press. 327–351.
[121]
OHLIN, J.D. et al. 2013. Assessing the Control-Theory. Leiden Journal of International Law. 26, 03 (Sep. 2013), 725–746. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156513000319.
[122]
Olasolo, H. 2009. Joint Criminal Enterprise and Its Extended Form: a Theory of Co-Perpetration Giving Rise To Principal Liability, a Notion of Accessorial Liability, or a Form of Partnership In Crime? Criminal Law Forum. 20, 2–3 (Jun. 2009), 263–287. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-009-9098-9.
[123]
Olásolo, H. 2007. Reflections on the Treatment of the Notions of Control of the Crime and Joint Criminal Enterprise in the Stakić Appeal Judgement. International Criminal Law Review. 7, 1 (Jan. 2007), 143–162. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/156753607X181587.
[124]
Orlova, A.V. and Moore, J.W. 2004. Umbrellas or Building Blocks: Defining International Terrorism and Transnational Organized Crime in International Law. Houston journal of international law. 27, 2 (2004), 267–310.
[125]
Pannenbecker, O. 1964. The Nuremberg War-Crimes Trial. DePaul Law Review. 14, 2 (1964), 348–359.
[126]
Payam Akhavan 2001. Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities? The American Journal of International Law. 95, 1 (2001), 7–31.
[127]
Payam Akhavan 2012. Reducing genocide to law. Cambridge University Press.
[128]
Peter Krug 2000. The Emerging Mental Incapacity Defense in International Criminal Law: Some Initial Questions of Implementation. The American Journal of International Law. 94, 2 (2000), 317–335.
[129]
Philippe Kirsch and John T. Holmes 1999. The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process. The American Journal of International Law. 93, 1 (1999), 2–12.
[130]
Powles, S. 2004. Joint Criminal Enterprise. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2, 2 (2004), 606–619. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/2.2.606.
[131]
Raphael Lemkin 1947. Genocide as a Crime under International Law. The American Journal of International Law. 41, 1 (1947), 145–151.
[132]
Ratner, Steven R. et al. 2009. Accountability for human rights atrocities in international law: beyond the Nuremberg legacy. Oxford University Press.
[133]
Robinson, D. 2011. The Controversy over Territorial State Referrals and Reflections on ICL Discourse. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 9, 2 (May 2011), 355–384. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr009.
[134]
ROBINSON, D. 2008. The Identity Crisis of International Criminal Law. Leiden Journal of International Law. 21, 04 (Dec. 2008). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156508005463.
[135]
RODMAN, K.A. 2009. Is Peace in the Interests of Justice? The Case for Broad Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court. Leiden Journal of International Law. 22, 01 (Mar. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156508005657.
[136]
Rogers, A. P. V. 2004. Law on the battlefield. Manchester University Press.
[137]
Rogers, Tony 2002. The official manual on the law of armed conflict. Oxford University Press.
[138]
Rowe, P. 1998. Duress as a Defence to War Crimes after Erdemović: A Laboratory for a Permanent Court? Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. 1, (Dec. 1998). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1389135900000118.
[139]
SÁCOUTO, S. and CLEARY, K. 2010. The Katanga Complementarity Decisions: Sound Law but Flawed Policy. Leiden Journal of International Law. 23, 02 (Jun. 2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156510000087.
[140]
SADAT, L. 2009. Transjudicial Dialogue and the Rwandan Genocide: Aspects of Antagonism and Complementarity. Leiden Journal of International Law. 22, 03 (Sep. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509990082.
[141]
Sadat, Leila Nadya 2002. The International Criminal Court and the transformation of international law: justice for the new millennium. Transnational Publishers.
[142]
Samuel M. Witten 1998. The International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings. The American Journal of International Law. 92, 4 (1998), 774–781.
[143]
Sands, Philippe 2003. From Nuremberg to the Hague: the future of international criminal justice. Cambridge University Press.
[144]
SAUL, B. 2011. Legislating from a Radical Hague: The United Nations Special Tribunal for Lebanon Invents an International Crime of Transnational Terrorism. Leiden Journal of International Law. 24, 03 (Sep. 2011), 677–700. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156511000203.
[145]
Saxon, D. 2005. Exporting Justice: Perceptions of the ICTY Among the Serbian, Croatian, and Muslim Communities in the Former Yugoslavia. Journal of Human Rights. 4, 4 (Oct. 2005), 559–572. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14754830500332837.
[146]
van Schaack, B. 1998. The Definition of Crimes against Humanity: Resolving the Incoherence. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 37, 3 (1998), 787–850.
[147]
Schabas, W.A. 2006. The Legitimacy and Legality of the Tribunals. The UN international criminal tribunals: the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. Cambridge University Press.
[148]
Schabas, William 2009. Genocide in international law: the crime of crimes. Cambridge University Press.
[149]
SCHEFFER, D. 2010. The Complex Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute. Leiden Journal of International Law. 23, 04 (Dec. 2010), 897–904. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156510000452.
[150]
Schwarzenberger, G. 1947. The Judgement of Nuremberg. Tulane Law Review. 21, 3 (1947), 329–361.
[151]
Shlomit Wallerstein 2010. Why English law should not incorporate the defence of superior orders. Criminal Law Review. 2 (2010), 109–126.
[152]
Simpson, Gerry J. 2007. Law, war and crime: war crimes trials and the reinvention of international law. Polity.
[153]
Simpson, G.J. 1997. War Crimes: a Critical Introduction. The law of war crimes: national and international approaches. Kluwer Law International.
[154]
Southwick, K.G. 2005. Srebrenica as Genocide - The Krstic Decision and the Language of the Unspeakable. Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal. 8, (2005), 188–227.
[155]
Spiga, V. 2012. No Redress without Justice: Victims and International Criminal Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 5 (Dec. 2012), 1377–1394. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs076.
[156]
Stahn, C. 2006. Participation of Victims in Pre-Trial Proceedings of the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 4, 2 (Apr. 2006), 219–238. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi089.
[157]
Stegmiller, I. 2009. The Gravity Threshold under the ICC Statute: Gravity Back and Forth in Lubanga and Ntaganda. International Criminal Law Review. 9, 3 (2009), 547–566.
[158]
STEWART, J.G. 2012. The End of ‘Modes of Liability’ for International Crimes. Leiden Journal of International Law. 25, 01 (Mar. 2012), 165–219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156511000653.
[159]
Subedi, S.P. 2002. UN Response to International Terrorism in the Aftermath of of the Terrorist Attacks in America and the Problem of the Definition of Terrorism in International Law. International Community Law Review. 4, 3 (2002), 159–169.
[160]
Subedi, S.P. 2002. UN Response to International Terrorism in the Aftermath of of the Terrorist Attacks in America and the Problem of the Definition of Terrorism in International Law. International Community Law Review. 4, 3 (2002), 159–169.
[161]
Tanaka, Toshiyuki et al. 2011. Beyond victor’s justice? Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
[162]
Weigend, T. 2012. ‘In general a principle of justice’: The Debate on the ‘Crime against Peace’ in the Wake of the Nuremberg Judgment. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 1 (Mar. 2012), 41–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr057.
[163]
Weigend, T. 2008. Intent, Mistake of Law, and Co-perpetration in the Lubanga Decision on Confirmation of Charges. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 6, 3 (Jul. 2008), 471–487. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqn034.
[164]
van der Wilt, H. 2012. War Crimes and the Requirement of a Nexus with an Armed Conflict. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10, 5 (Dec. 2012), 1113–1128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs060.
[165]
van der Wilt, H.G. 2009. The Continuous Quest for Proper Modes of Criminal Responsibility. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 7, 2 (May 2009), 307–314. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqp033.
[166]
Yoram Dinstein 2011. War, aggression, and self-defence. Cambridge University Press.
[167]
Zacklin, R. 2004. The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2, 2 (Jun. 2004), 541–545. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/2.2.541.
[168]
Zahar, Alexander and Sluiter, Göran 2008. International criminal law: a critical introduction. Oxford University Press.
[169]
Zimmermann, A. 2002. Superior Orders. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
[170]
2012. , the ICC, and the Problem with the Peace-and-Justice Divide. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 106, (Mar. 2012), 309–313. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0309.
[171]
2011. A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression. The American Journal of International Law. 105, 3 (Jul. 2011), 517–533. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.105.3.0517.
[172]
2004. Black Letter Lawyering v. Constructive Interpretation. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2, 1 (2004), 265–274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/2.1.265.
[173]
Completion or Continuation Strategy?
[174]
2013. Crimes Against Humanity in the Modern Age. The American Journal of International Law. 107, 2 (Apr. 2013), 334–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.2.0334.
[175]
2001. Defences before the international criminal court: Substantive grounds for excluding criminal responsibility – Part 1. International Criminal Law Review. 1, 1 (Jan. 2001), 111–172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/15718120121002559.
[176]
2002. Defences before the International Criminal Court: Substantive grounds for excluding criminal responsibility – Part 2. International Criminal Law Review. 2, 1 (Feb. 2002), 1–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/157181202400285969.
[177]
Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors : Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors Oxford Scholarship Online.
[178]
1922. German War Trials: Judgment in Case of Lieutenants Dithmar and Boldt. The American Journal of International Law. 16, 4 (1922), 708–724.
[179]
2001. Institution-Building and Human Rights Protection in Kosovo in the Light of UNMIK Legislation. Nordic Journal of International Law. 70, 4 (Apr. 2001), 461–488. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/15718100120296728.
[180]
2012. Introductory Remarks by William Schabas. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 106, (Mar. 2012), 305–307. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0305.
[181]
1968. Is Hijacking of Aircraft Piracy in International Law. The British yearbook of international law. 43, (1968), 193–204.
[182]
1947. Judgment. The American Journal of International Law. 41, 1 (1947), 172–333.
[183]
1947. Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of International Law--International Military Tribunal (Nuremburg), Judgment and Sentences. American Journal of International Law.
[184]
2012. Remarks by Olivia Swaak-Goldman. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 106, (Mar. 2012), 313–316. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0313.
[185]
2001. The definition of genocide: Joining the dots in the light of recent practice. International Criminal Law Review. 1, 3 (Mar. 2001), 285–313. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/15718120121002630.
[186]
The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals.
[187]
The German Chief Federal Prosecutor’s Decision Not to Investigate the Alleged Crime of Preparing Aggression against Iraq.
