1
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
2
Cryer, Robert. The History of International Criminal Prosecutions: Nuremberg and Toyko. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010:109–21.
3
Cryer R. International Criminal Law (chapter 25). International law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010:752–83.
4
Boister N, Cryer R. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal - A Reappraisal : The Tokyo International Military Tribunal - A Reappraisal Oxford Scholarship Online. 2008.
5
Cryer, Robert. Prosecuting international crimes: selectivity and the international criminal law regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.
6
Pannenbecker O. The Nuremberg War-Crimes Trial. DePaul Law Review. 1964;14:348–59.
7
Mettraux, Guénaël. Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
8
Claus Kreß. Versailles Nürnberg Den Haag: Deutschland und das Völkerstrafrecht. JuristenZeitung. 2006;981–91.
9
ROBINSON D. The Identity Crisis of International Criminal Law. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2008;21. doi: 10.1017/S0922156508005463
10
Simpson GJ. War Crimes: a Critical Introduction. The law of war crimes: national and international approaches. The Hague: Kluwer Law International 1997.
11
Schwarzenberger G. The Judgement of Nuremberg. Tulane Law Review. 1947;21:329–61.
12
Tanaka, Toshiyuki, Timothy L. H. McCormack, Gerry J. Simpson. Beyond victor’s justice? Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2011.
13
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
14
The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals.
15
Schabas WA. The Legitimacy and Legality of the Tribunals. The UN international criminal tribunals: the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
16
Alvarez JE. Crimes of States/Crimes of Hate: Lessons from Rwanda. Yale Journal of International Law. 1999;24:365–480.
17
Alvarez JE. Crimes of States/Crimes of Hate: Lessons from Rwanda. Yale Journal of International Law. 1999;24:365–480.
18
Mose E. Main Achievements of the ICTR. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005;3:920–43. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqi068
19
Completion or Continuation Strategy?
20
SADAT L. Transjudicial Dialogue and the Rwandan Genocide: Aspects of Antagonism and Complementarity. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2009;22. doi: 10.1017/S0922156509990082
21
Ratner, Steven R., Abrams, Jason S., Bischoff, James L. Accountability for human rights atrocities in international law: beyond the Nuremberg legacy. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
22
McCARGO D. Politics by other means? The virtual trials of the Khmer Rouge tribunal. International Affairs. 2011;87:613–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00993.x
23
MÉGRET F. A Special Tribunal for Lebanon: The UN Security Council and the Emancipation of International Criminal Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2008;21. doi: 10.1017/S0922156508005062
24
Institution-Building and Human Rights Protection in Kosovo in the Light of UNMIK Legislation. Nordic Journal of International Law. 2001;70:461–88. doi: 10.1163/15718100120296728
25
Horsington H. The Cambodian Khmer Rouge Tribunal: The Promise of a Hybrid Tribunal. Melbourne Journal of International Law. 2004;5:462–82.
26
Linton S. Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: Experiments in international justice. Criminal Law Forum. 2001;12:185–246. doi: 10.1023/A:1013344422072
27
Guilfoyle D. Prosecuting Somali Pirates: A Critical Evaluation of the Options. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:767–96. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs036
28
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
29
Philippe Kirsch and John T. Holmes. The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process. The American Journal of International Law. 1999;93:2–12.
30
SÁCOUTO S, CLEARY K. The Katanga Complementarity Decisions: Sound Law but Flawed Policy. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2010;23. doi: 10.1017/S0922156510000087
31
Benzing M. The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online. 2003;7:591–628. doi: 10.1163/138946303775160250
32
CRYER R. Sudan, Resolution 1593, and International Criminal Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2006;19. doi: 10.1017/S0922156505003237
33
GIOIA F. State Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, and ‘Modern’ International Law: The Principle of Complementarity in the International Criminal Court. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2006;19. doi: 10.1017/S0922156506003761
34
Stegmiller I. The Gravity Threshold under the ICC Statute: Gravity Back and Forth in Lubanga and Ntaganda. International Criminal Law Review. 2009;9:547–66.
35
Crawford J. The Work of the International Law Commission. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
36
Lee, Roy S., Project on International Courts and Tribunals, United Nations Institute for Training and Research. The International Criminal Court: the making of the Rome Statute : issues, negotiations, results. The Hague: Kluwer Law International 1999.
37
Introductory Remarks by William Schabas. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 2012;106:305–7. doi: 10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0305
38
, the ICC, and the Problem with the Peace-and-Justice Divide. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 2012;106:309–13. doi: 10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0309
39
Remarks by Olivia Swaak-Goldman. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 2012;106:313–6. doi: 10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0313
40
Nouwen SMH. Justifying justice. In: Crawford J, Koskenniemi M, Ranganathan S, eds. The Cambridge Companion to International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012:327–51.
41
Akande D. The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2003;1:618–50. doi: 10.1093/jicj/1.3.618
42
Akhavan P. Are International Criminal Tribunals a Disincentive to Peace?: Reconciling Judicial Romanticism with Political Realism. Human Rights Quarterly. 2009;31:624–54. doi: 10.1353/hrq.0.0096
43
Megret F. Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law. European Journal of International Law. 2001;12:247–68. doi: 10.1093/ejil/12.2.247
44
Michael P. Scharf. The ICC’s Jurisdiction over the Nationals of Non-Party States: A Critique of the U.S. Position. Law and Contemporary Problems. 2001;64:67–117.
45
Goldston JA. More Candour about Criteria: The Exercise of Discretion by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2010;8:383–406. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqq019
46
Clark JN. Peace, Justice and the International Criminal Court: Limitations and Possibilities. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011;9:521–45. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqr007
47
RODMAN KA. Is Peace in the Interests of Justice? The Case for Broad Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2009;22. doi: 10.1017/S0922156508005657
48
Sadat, Leila Nadya. The International Criminal Court and the transformation of international law: justice for the new millennium. Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers 2002.
49
Sands, Philippe. From Nuremberg to the Hague: the future of international criminal justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003.
50
Robinson D. The Controversy over Territorial State Referrals and Reflections on ICL Discourse. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011;9:355–84. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqr009
51
Damaška M. What is the point of international criminal justice? Chicago-Kent Law Review. 2008;83:329–64.
52
Duff A. Authority and responsibility in international criminal law. The philosophy of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010:589–604.
53
Koskenniemi M. Between Impunity and Show Trials. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online. 2002;6:1–32. doi: 10.1163/138946302775159451
54
Saxon D. Exporting Justice: Perceptions of the ICTY Among the Serbian, Croatian, and Muslim Communities in the Former Yugoslavia. Journal of Human Rights. 2005;4:559–72. doi: 10.1080/14754830500332837
55
Allott, Philip. The health of nations: society and law beyond the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.
56
Payam Akhavan. Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities? The American Journal of International Law. 2001;95:7–31.
57
Drumbl, Mark A. Atrocity, punishment, and international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
58
Simpson, Gerry J. Law, war and crime: war crimes trials and the reinvention of international law. Cambridge: Polity 2007.
59
Duff A. Can we punish the perpetrators of atrocities? The religious in responses to mass atrocity: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013.
60
Luban D. Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law. The philosophy of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
61
Nouwen SMH. Justifying justice. In: Crawford J, Koskenniemi M, Ranganathan S, eds. The Cambridge Companion to International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012:327–51.
62
Kutnjak Ivkovich S, Hagan J. Reclaiming Justice : Reclaiming JusticeThe International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Local Courts. 2011.
63
Zacklin R. The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2004;2:541–5. doi: 10.1093/jicj/2.2.541
64
David Wippman. The Costs of International Justice. The American Journal of International Law. 2006;100:861–81.
65
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
66
Crimes Against Humanity in the Modern Age. The American Journal of International Law. 2013;107:334–77. doi: 10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.2.0334
67
Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, Jones, John R. W. D., et al. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
68
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., Reid, Natalie L. Elements of crimes under international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008.
69
KIRSCH S. Two Kinds of Wrong: On the Context Element of Crimes against Humanity. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2009;22. doi: 10.1017/S0922156509990070
70
Nersessian D. Comparative Approaches to Punishing Hate: The Intersection of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity. Stanford Journal of International Law. 2007;43:221–64.
71
van Schaack B. The Definition of Crimes against Humanity: Resolving the Incoherence. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 1998;37:787–850.
72
Zahar, Alexander, Sluiter, Göran. International criminal law: a critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
73
Luban D. A Theory of Crimes against Humanity. Yale Journal of International Law. 2004;29:85–168.
74
Macleod C. Towards a Philosophical Account of Crimes Against Humanity. European Journal of International Law. 2010;21:281–302. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chq031
75
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
76
Kress C. The Crime of Genocide and Contextual Elements: A Comment on the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber’s Decision in the Al Bashir Case. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2009;7:297–306. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqp031
77
Schabas, William. Genocide in international law: the crime of crimes. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009.
78
Payam Akhavan. Reducing genocide to law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
79
Ambos K. What does ‘intent to destroy’ in genocide mean? International Review of the Red Cross. 2009;91:833–58. doi: 10.1017/S1816383110000056
80
Behrens P. Genocide and the Question of Motives. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:501–23. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs038
81
Alexander K. A. Greenawalt. Rethinking Genocidal Intent: The Case for a Knowledge-Based Interpretation. Columbia Law Review. 1999;99:2259–94.
82
The definition of genocide: Joining the dots in the light of recent practice. International Criminal Law Review. 2001;1:285–313. doi: 10.1163/15718120121002630
83
Kabatsi F. Defining or Diverting Genocide: Changing the Comportment of Genocide. International Criminal Law Review. 2005;5:387–400. doi: 10.1163/1571812054940085
84
Kreß C. The Crime of Genocide under International Law. International Criminal Law Review. 2006;6:461–502. doi: 10.1163/157181206778992287
85
Kress C. The Darfur Report and Genocidal Intent. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005;3:562–78. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqi054
86
Kress C. The International Court of Justice and the Elements of the Crime of Genocide. European Journal of International Law. 2007;18:619–29. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chm039
87
Raphael Lemkin. Genocide as a Crime under International Law. The American Journal of International Law. 1947;41:145–51.
88
Southwick KG. Srebrenica as Genocide - The Krstic Decision and the Language of the Unspeakable. Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal. 2005;8:188–227.
89
Cécile Tournaye. Genocidal Intent before the ICTY. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2003;52:447–62.
90
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
91
Chehtman A. Developing Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Capacity to Process War Crimes Cases: Critical Notes on a ‘Success Story’. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011;9:547–70. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqr024
92
van der Wilt H. War Crimes and the Requirement of a Nexus with an Armed Conflict. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:1113–28. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs060
93
Cassese A. The Nexus Requirement for War Crimes. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:1395–417. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs082
94
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., Reid, Natalie L. Elements of crimes under international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008.
95
Akhavan P. Reconciling Crimes Against Humanity with the Laws of War: Human Rights, Armed Conflict, and the Limits of Progressive Jurisprudence. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2008;6:21–37. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqn001
96
de Beco G. War Crimes in International Versus Non-International Armed Conflicts: ‘New Wine in Old Wineskins’? International Criminal Law Review. 2008;8:319–29. doi: 10.1163/156753608X265312
97
Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, Jones, John R. W. D., et al. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
98
CRAWFORD E. Unequal before the Law: The Case for the Elimination of the Distinction between International and Non-international Armed Conflicts. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2007;20. doi: 10.1017/S092215650700413X
99
Dörmann, Knut, Doswald-Beck, Louise, Kolb, Robert. Elements of war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: sources and commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003.
100
Fenrick WJ. THE PROSECUTION OF UNLAWFUL ATTACK CASES BEFORE THE ICTY. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. 2004;7. doi: 10.1017/S1389135904001539
101
Fleck, Dieter, Bothe, Michael. The handbook of international humanitarian law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
102
Matthew Happold. Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga, Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court, 29 January 2007. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2007;56:713–24.
103
Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors : Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors Oxford Scholarship Online.
104
Rogers, A. P. V. Law on the battlefield. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press 2004.
105
Rogers, Tony. The official manual on the law of armed conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
106
Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of International Law--International Military Tribunal (Nuremburg), Judgment and Sentences. American Journal of International Law. 1947;41:172–333.
107
Antonio C. The Rochling case. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
108
Antonio C. The Engister case. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
109
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
110
Yoram Dinstein. War, aggression, and self-defence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011.
111
Brownlie I. International Law and the Use of Force by States : International Law and the Use of Force by States Oxford Scholarship Online. 1963.
112
Cryer R. Aggression at the Court of Appeal. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 2005;10:209–30. doi: 10.1093/jcsl/kri012
113
Fernandez de Gurmendi SA. The Working Group on Aggression at the Prepatory Commission for the International Criminal Court,. Fordham International Law Journal. 2001;25:589–605.
114
Fife RE. Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States. Human rights and criminal justice for the downtrodden: essays in honour of Asbjørn Eide. Leiden: Marinus Nijhoff 2003.
115
Glennon M. Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States. Yale Journal of International Law. 2010;35:71–114.
116
The German Chief Federal Prosecutor’s Decision Not to Investigate the Alleged Crime of Preparing Aggression against Iraq.
117
Murphy SD. Aggression, Legitimacy and the International Criminal Court. European Journal of International Law. 2009;20:1147–56. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chp079
118
Weigend T. ‘In general a principle of justice’: The Debate on the ‘Crime against Peace’ in the Wake of the Nuremberg Judgment. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:41–58. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqr057
119
BLOKKER N, KRESS C. A Consensus Agreement on the Crime of Aggression: Impressions from Kampala. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2010;23:889–95. doi: 10.1017/S0922156510000440
120
SCHEFFER D. The Complex Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2010;23:897–904. doi: 10.1017/S0922156510000452
121
Ellen O’Connell M, Niyazmatov M. What is Aggression?: Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:189–207. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs003
122
Ellen O’Connell M, Niyazmatov M. What is Aggression?: Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:189–207. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs003
123
Barriga S. Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression. The travaux preparatoires of the crime of aggression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
124
A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression. The American Journal of International Law. 2011;105:517–33. doi: 10.5305/amerjintelaw.105.3.0517
125
Kress C, von Holtzendorff L. The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2010;8:1179–217. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqq069
126
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
127
Cassese, Antonio. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
128
Cassese, Antonio. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
129
Ambos K. Superior Responsibility. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
130
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., Reid, Natalie L. Forms of responsibility in international criminal law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
131
Clark RS. Drafting a General Part to a Penal Code: Some Thoughts Inspired by the Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and by the Court’s First Substantive Law Discussion in the Lubanga Dyilo Confirmation Proceedings. Criminal Law Forum. 2008;19:519–52. doi: 10.1007/s10609-008-9074-9
132
Esser A. Individual Criminal Responsibility. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
133
Badar ME. The Mental Element In The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court: A Commentary From A Comparative Criminal Law Perspective. Criminal Law Forum. 2008;19:473–518. doi: 10.1007/s10609-008-9085-6
134
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
135
OHLIN JD, VAN SLIEDREGT E, WEIGEND T. Assessing the Control-Theory. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2013;26:725–46. doi: 10.1017/S0922156513000319
136
STEWART JG. The End of ‘Modes of Liability’ for International Crimes. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2012;25:165–219. doi: 10.1017/S0922156511000653
137
Cassese, Antonio. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
138
Cassese, Antonio, Cassese, Antonio. Cassese’s International criminal law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
139
Cassese A. The Proper Limits of Individual Responsibility under the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005;5:109–33. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mql091
140
Black Letter Lawyering v. Constructive Interpretation. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2004;2:265–74. doi: 10.1093/jicj/2.1.265
141
Guilfoyle D. Responsibility for Collective Atrocities: Fair Labelling and Approaches to Commission in International Criminal Law. Current Legal Problems. 2011;64:255–86. doi: 10.1093/clp/cur006
142
Olasolo H. Joint Criminal Enterprise and Its Extended Form: a Theory of Co-Perpetration Giving Rise To Principal Liability, a Notion of Accessorial Liability, or a Form of Partnership In Crime? Criminal Law Forum. 2009;20:263–87. doi: 10.1007/s10609-009-9098-9
143
Olásolo H. Reflections on the Treatment of the Notions of Control of the Crime and Joint Criminal Enterprise in the Stakić Appeal Judgement. International Criminal Law Review. 2007;7:143–62. doi: 10.1163/156753607X181587
144
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., Reid, Natalie L. Forms of responsibility in international criminal law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
145
Clark RS. Drafting a General Part to a Penal Code: Some Thoughts Inspired by the Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and by the Court’s First Substantive Law Discussion in the Lubanga Dyilo Confirmation Proceedings. Criminal Law Forum. 2008;19:519–52. doi: 10.1007/s10609-008-9074-9
146
Esser A. Individual Criminal Responsibility. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
147
Powles S. Joint Criminal Enterprise. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2004;2:606–19. doi: 10.1093/jicj/2.2.606
148
Weigend T. Intent, Mistake of Law, and Co-perpetration in the Lubanga Decision on Confirmation of Charges. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2008;6:471–87. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqn034
149
van der Wilt HG. The Continuous Quest for Proper Modes of Criminal Responsibility. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2009;7:307–14. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqp033
150
Ambos K. The Fujimori Judgment: A President’s Responsibility for Crimes Against Humanity as Indirect Perpetrator by Virtue of an Organized Power Apparatus. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011;9:137–58. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqq059
151
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
152
Shlomit Wallerstein. Why English law should not incorporate the defence of superior orders. Criminal Law Review. 2010;109–26.
153
Cryer R. Superior Scholarship on Superior Orders: An Appreciation of Yoram Dinstein’s The Defence of ‘Obedience to Superior Orders’ in International Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011;9:959–72. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqr032
154
Ambos K. Other Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
155
Cassese A. Justifications and Excuses in International Criminal Law. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
156
Clark RS. The Mental Element in International Criminal Law: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Elements of Offences. Criminal Law Forum. 2001;12:291–334. doi: 10.1023/A:1014929127650
157
Cryer, Robert. Prosecuting international crimes: selectivity and the international criminal law regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.
158
Anthony D’Amato. Superior Orders vs. Command Responsibility. The American Journal of International Law. 1986;80:604–8.
159
Fichtelberg A. Liberal Values in International Criminal Law: A Critique of Erdemovic. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2008;6:3–19. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqm026
160
Gaeta P. The defence of superior orders: the statute of International Criminal Court versus customary international law. European Journal of International Law. 1999;10:172–91. doi: 10.1093/ejil/10.1.172
161
Peter Krug. The Emerging Mental Incapacity Defense in International Criminal Law: Some Initial Questions of Implementation. The American Journal of International Law. 2000;94:317–35.
162
Kress C. War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflicts. Israel yearbook on human rights. 2000.
163
Lippman M. Conundrums of Armed Conflict: Criminal Defenses to Violate of the Humanitarian Law of War. Dickinson Journal of International Law. 1996;15:1–111.
164
Morss, John R. Banality of Justice: Reflections on Sierra Leone’s Special Court, The. Oregon Review of International Law. 2006;8:1–30.
165
Defences before the international criminal court: Substantive grounds for excluding criminal responsibility – Part 1. International Criminal Law Review. 2001;1:111–72. doi: 10.1163/15718120121002559
166
Defences before the International Criminal Court: Substantive grounds for excluding criminal responsibility – Part 2. International Criminal Law Review. 2002;2:1–46. doi: 10.1163/157181202400285969
167
Rowe P. Duress as a Defence to War Crimes after Erdemović: A Laboratory for a Permanent Court? Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. 1998;1. doi: 10.1017/S1389135900000118
168
Zimmermann A. Superior Orders. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
169
Judgment. The American Journal of International Law. 1947;41:172–333.
170
German War Trials: Judgment in Case of Lieutenants Dithmar and Boldt. The American Journal of International Law. 1922;16:708–24.
171
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
172
Catani L. Victims at the International Criminal Court: Some Lessons Learned from the Lubanga Case. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:905–22. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs053
173
Aptel C. Prosecutorial Discretion at the ICC and Victims’ Right to Remedy: Narrowing the Impunity Gap. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:1357–75. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs077
174
Spiga V. No Redress without Justice: Victims and International Criminal Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012;10:1377–94. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs076
175
Stahn C. Participation of Victims in Pre-Trial Proceedings of the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006;4:219–38. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqi089
176
FRIMAN H. The International Criminal Court and Participation of Victims: A Third Party to the Proceedings? Leiden Journal of International Law. 2009;22. doi: 10.1017/S0922156509990057
177
Jorda C, De Hemptinne J. The status and role of the victim. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
178
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
179
SAUL B. Legislating from a Radical Hague: The United Nations Special Tribunal for Lebanon Invents an International Crime of Transnational Terrorism. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2011;24:677–700. doi: 10.1017/S0922156511000203
180
Di Filippo M. Terrorist Crimes and International Co-operation: Critical Remarks on the Definition and Inclusion of Terrorism in the Category of International Crimes. European Journal of International Law. 2008;19:533–70. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chn027
181
Joyner C. International Extradition and Global Terrorism: Bringing International Criminals to Justice. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review. 2002;25:493–542.
182
Mazandaran PA. An International Legal Response to an International Problem: Prosecuting International Terrorists. International Criminal Law Review. 2006;6:503–48. doi: 10.1163/157181206778992232
183
Orlova AV, Moore JW. Umbrellas or Building Blocks: Defining International Terrorism and Transnational Organized Crime in International Law. Houston journal of international law. 2004;27:267–310.
184
Subedi SP. UN Response to International Terrorism in the Aftermath of of the Terrorist Attacks in America and the Problem of the Definition of Terrorism in International Law. International Community Law Review. 2002;4:159–69.
185
Subedi SP. UN Response to International Terrorism in the Aftermath of of the Terrorist Attacks in America and the Problem of the Definition of Terrorism in International Law. International Community Law Review. 2002;4:159–69.
186
Samuel M. Witten. The International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings. The American Journal of International Law. 1998;92:774–81.
187
Is Hijacking of Aircraft Piracy in International Law. The British yearbook of international law. 1968;43:193–204.
