1.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
2.
Cryer, Robert. The History of International Criminal Prosecutions: Nuremberg and Toyko. In: An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 109–21.
3.
Cryer R. International Criminal Law (chapter 25). In: International law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 752–83.
4.
Boister N, Cryer R. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal - A Reappraisal : The Tokyo International Military Tribunal - A Reappraisal Oxford Scholarship Online [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278527.001.0001/acprof-9780199278527
5.
Cryer, Robert. Prosecuting international crimes: selectivity and the international criminal law regime. Vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
6.
Pannenbecker O. The Nuremberg War-Crimes Trial. DePaul Law Review [Internet]. 1964;14(2):348–59. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/deplr14&div=30&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults#360
7.
Mettraux, Guénaël. Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
8.
Claus Kreß. Versailles Nürnberg Den Haag: Deutschland und das Völkerstrafrecht. JuristenZeitung [Internet]. 2006;981–91. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20828450
9.
ROBINSON D. The Identity Crisis of International Criminal Law. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2008 Dec;21(04).
10.
Simpson GJ. War Crimes: a Critical Introduction. In: The law of war crimes: national and international approaches. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 1997.
11.
Schwarzenberger G. The Judgement of Nuremberg. Tulane Law Review [Internet]. 1947;21(3):329–61. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tulr21&id=357&collection=journals&index=journals/tulr#357
12.
Tanaka, Toshiyuki, Timothy L. H. McCormack, Gerry J. Simpson. Beyond victor’s justice? Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2011.
13.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
14.
The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals. Available from: http://jicj.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/2/541.full.pdf html
15.
Schabas WA. The Legitimacy and Legality of the Tribunals. In: The UN international criminal tribunals: the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
16.
Alvarez JE. Crimes of States/Crimes of Hate: Lessons from Rwanda. Yale Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1999;24:365–480. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil24&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil377&id=377
17.
Alvarez JE. Crimes of States/Crimes of Hate: Lessons from Rwanda. Yale Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1999;24(2):365–480. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil24&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil377&id=377
18.
Mose E. Main Achievements of the ICTR. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005 Aug 12;3(4):920–43.
19.
Completion or Continuation Strategy? Available from: http://jicj.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/4/655.full.pdf html
20.
SADAT L. Transjudicial Dialogue and the Rwandan Genocide: Aspects of Antagonism and Complementarity. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2009 Sep;22(03).
21.
Ratner, Steven R., Abrams, Jason S., Bischoff, James L. Accountability for human rights atrocities in international law: beyond the Nuremberg legacy. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
22.
McCARGO D. Politics by other means? The virtual trials of the Khmer Rouge tribunal. International Affairs. 2011 May;87(3):613–27.
23.
MÉGRET F. A Special Tribunal for Lebanon: The UN Security Council and the Emancipation of International Criminal Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2008 Jun;21(02).
24.
Institution-Building and Human Rights Protection in Kosovo in the Light of UNMIK Legislation. Nordic Journal of International Law. 2001 Apr 1;70(4):461–88.
25.
Horsington H. The Cambodian Khmer Rouge Tribunal: The Promise of a Hybrid Tribunal. Melbourne Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2004;5(2):462–82. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/meljil5&div=25&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults#468
26.
Linton S. Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: Experiments in international justice. Criminal Law Forum. 2001;12(2):185–246.
27.
Guilfoyle D. Prosecuting Somali Pirates: A Critical Evaluation of the Options. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Sep 1;10(4):767–96.
28.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
29.
Philippe Kirsch and John T. Holmes. The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1999;93(1):2–12. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2997952
30.
SÁCOUTO S, CLEARY K. The Katanga Complementarity Decisions: Sound Law but Flawed Policy. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2010 Jun;23(02).
31.
Benzing M. The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online. 2003 Jan 1;7(1):591–628.
32.
CRYER R. Sudan, Resolution 1593, and International Criminal Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2006 Mar;19(01).
33.
GIOIA F. State Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, and ‘Modern’ International Law: The Principle of Complementarity in the International Criminal Court. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2006 Dec;19(04).
34.
Stegmiller I. The Gravity Threshold under the ICC Statute: Gravity Back and Forth in Lubanga and Ntaganda. International Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2009;9(3):547–66. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intcrimlrb9&collection=journals&index=journals/intcrimlrb555&id=555#555
35.
Crawford J. The Work of the International Law Commission. In: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
36.
Lee, Roy S., Project on International Courts and Tribunals, United Nations Institute for Training and Research. The International Criminal Court: the making of the Rome Statute : issues, negotiations, results. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 1999.
37.
Introductory Remarks by William Schabas. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 2012 Mar 28;106:305–7.
38.
, the ICC, and the Problem with the Peace-and-Justice Divide. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 2012 Mar 28;106:309–13.
39.
Remarks by Olivia Swaak-Goldman. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 2012 Mar 28;106:313–6.
40.
Nouwen SMH. Justifying justice. In: Crawford J, Koskenniemi M, Ranganathan S, editors. The Cambridge Companion to International Law [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. p. 327–51. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CCO9781139035651A027/type/book_part
41.
Akande D. The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2003 Dec 1;1(3):618–50.
42.
Akhavan P. Are International Criminal Tribunals a Disincentive to Peace?: Reconciling Judicial Romanticism with Political Realism. Human Rights Quarterly. 2009;31(3):624–54.
43.
Megret F. Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law. European Journal of International Law. 2001 Apr 1;12(2):247–68.
44.
Michael P. Scharf. The ICC’s Jurisdiction over the Nationals of Non-Party States: A Critique of the U.S. Position. Law and Contemporary Problems [Internet]. 2001;64(1):67–117. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1192355
45.
Goldston JA. More Candour about Criteria: The Exercise of Discretion by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2010 May 1;8(2):383–406.
46.
Clark JN. Peace, Justice and the International Criminal Court: Limitations and Possibilities. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011 Jul 1;9(3):521–45.
47.
RODMAN KA. Is Peace in the Interests of Justice? The Case for Broad Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2009 Mar;22(01).
48.
Sadat, Leila Nadya. The International Criminal Court and the transformation of international law: justice for the new millennium. Vol. International and comparative criminal law series. Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers; 2002.
49.
Sands, Philippe. From Nuremberg to the Hague: the future of international criminal justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
50.
Robinson D. The Controversy over Territorial State Referrals and Reflections on ICL Discourse. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011 May 1;9(2):355–84.
51.
Damaška M. What is the point of international criminal justice? Chicago-Kent Law Review [Internet]. 2008;83(1):329–64. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chknt83&id=353&collection=journals&index=journals/chknt#353
52.
Duff A. Authority and responsibility in international criminal law. In: The philosophy of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 589–604.
53.
Koskenniemi M. Between Impunity and Show Trials. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online. 2002 Jan 1;6(1):1–32.
54.
Saxon D. Exporting Justice: Perceptions of the ICTY Among the Serbian, Croatian, and Muslim Communities in the Former Yugoslavia. Journal of Human Rights. 2005 Oct;4(4):559–72.
55.
Allott, Philip. The health of nations: society and law beyond the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
56.
Payam Akhavan. Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities? The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2001;95(1):7–31. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2642034
57.
Drumbl, Mark A. Atrocity, punishment, and international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
58.
Simpson, Gerry J. Law, war and crime: war crimes trials and the reinvention of international law. Cambridge: Polity; 2007.
59.
Duff A. Can we punish the perpetrators of atrocities? In: The religious in responses to mass atrocity: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
60.
Luban D. Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law. In: The philosophy of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
61.
Nouwen SMH. Justifying justice. In: Crawford J, Koskenniemi M, Ranganathan S, editors. The Cambridge Companion to International Law [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. p. 327–51. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CCO9781139035651A027/type/book_part
62.
Kutnjak Ivkovich S, Hagan J. Reclaiming Justice : Reclaiming JusticeThe International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Local Courts [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340327.001.0001/acprof-9780195340327
63.
Zacklin R. The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2004 Jun 1;2(2):541–5.
64.
David Wippman. The Costs of International Justice. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2006;100(4):861–81. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4126321
65.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
66.
Crimes Against Humanity in the Modern Age. The American Journal of International Law. 2013 Apr;107(2):334–77.
67.
Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, Jones, John R. W. D., Eser, Albin. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
68.
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., Reid, Natalie L. Elements of crimes under international law. Vol. International criminal law practitioner library series Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
69.
KIRSCH S. Two Kinds of Wrong: On the Context Element of Crimes against Humanity. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2009 Sep;22(03).
70.
Nersessian D. Comparative Approaches to Punishing Hate: The Intersection of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity. Stanford Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2007;43(2):221–64. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/stanit43&id=225&collection=journals&index=journals/stanit#225
71.
van Schaack B. The Definition of Crimes against Humanity: Resolving the Incoherence. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law [Internet]. 1998;37(3):787–850. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cjtl37&id=795&collection=journals&index=journals/cjtl#795
72.
Zahar, Alexander, Sluiter, Göran. International criminal law: a critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
73.
Luban D. A Theory of Crimes against Humanity. Yale Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2004;29(1):85–168. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil29&id=95&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil#95
74.
Macleod C. Towards a Philosophical Account of Crimes Against Humanity. European Journal of International Law. 2010 May 1;21(2):281–302.
75.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
76.
Kress C. The Crime of Genocide and Contextual Elements: A Comment on the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber’s Decision in the Al Bashir Case. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2009 May 1;7(2):297–306.
77.
Schabas, William. Genocide in international law: the crime of crimes. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
78.
Payam Akhavan. Reducing genocide to law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
79.
Ambos K. What does ‘intent to destroy’ in genocide mean? International Review of the Red Cross. 2009 Dec;91(876):833–58.
80.
Behrens P. Genocide and the Question of Motives. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Jul 1;10(3):501–23.
81.
Alexander K. A. Greenawalt. Rethinking Genocidal Intent: The Case for a Knowledge-Based Interpretation. Columbia Law Review [Internet]. 1999;99(8):2259–94. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1123611
82.
The definition of genocide: Joining the dots in the light of recent practice. International Criminal Law Review. 2001 Mar 1;1(3):285–313.
83.
Kabatsi F. Defining or Diverting Genocide: Changing the Comportment of Genocide. International Criminal Law Review. 2005 Sep 1;5(3):387–400.
84.
Kreß C. The Crime of Genocide under International Law. International Criminal Law Review. 2006 Nov 1;6(4):461–502.
85.
Kress C. The Darfur Report and Genocidal Intent. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005 Jul 1;3(3):562–78.
86.
Kress C. The International Court of Justice and the Elements of the Crime of Genocide. European Journal of International Law. 2007 Sep 1;18(4):619–29.
87.
Raphael Lemkin. Genocide as a Crime under International Law. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1947;41(1):145–51. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2193871#abstract
88.
Southwick KG. Srebrenica as Genocide - The Krstic Decision and the Language of the Unspeakable. Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal [Internet]. 2005;8:188–227. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yhurdvl8&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults#188
89.
Cécile Tournaye. Genocidal Intent before the ICTY. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2003;52(2):447–62. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663116
90.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
91.
Chehtman A. Developing Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Capacity to Process War Crimes Cases: Critical Notes on a ‘Success Story’. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011 Jul 1;9(3):547–70.
92.
van der Wilt H. War Crimes and the Requirement of a Nexus with an Armed Conflict. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Dec 1;10(5):1113–28.
93.
Cassese A. The Nexus Requirement for War Crimes. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Dec 1;10(5):1395–417.
94.
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., Reid, Natalie L. Elements of crimes under international law. Vol. International criminal law practitioner library series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
95.
Akhavan P. Reconciling Crimes Against Humanity with the Laws of War: Human Rights, Armed Conflict, and the Limits of Progressive Jurisprudence. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2008 Mar 1;6(1):21–37.
96.
de Beco G. War Crimes in International Versus Non-International Armed Conflicts: ‘New Wine in Old Wineskins’? International Criminal Law Review. 2008 Mar 1;8(1):319–29.
97.
Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, Jones, John R. W. D., Eser, Albin. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
98.
CRAWFORD E. Unequal before the Law: The Case for the Elimination of the Distinction between International and Non-international Armed Conflicts. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2007 Jun;20(02).
99.
Dörmann, Knut, Doswald-Beck, Louise, Kolb, Robert. Elements of war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: sources and commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
100.
Fenrick WJ. THE PROSECUTION OF UNLAWFUL ATTACK CASES BEFORE THE ICTY. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. 2004 Dec;7.
101.
Fleck, Dieter, Bothe, Michael. The handbook of international humanitarian law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
102.
Matthew Happold. Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga, Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court, 29 January 2007. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2007;56(3):713–24. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498100
103.
Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors : Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors Oxford Scholarship Online [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584840.001.0001/acprof-9780199584840
104.
Rogers, A. P. V. Law on the battlefield. 2nd ed. Vol. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2004.
105.
Rogers, Tony. The official manual on the law of armed conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
106.
Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of International Law--International Military Tribunal (Nuremburg), Judgment and Sentences [Internet]. Vol. 41, American Journal of International Law. 1947. p. 172–333. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil41&id=178&collection=journals&index=journals/ajil#178
107.
Antonio C. The Rochling case. In: International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
108.
Antonio C. The Engister case. In: International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
109.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
110.
Yoram Dinstein. War, aggression, and self-defence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
111.
Brownlie I. International Law and the Use of Force by States : International Law and the Use of Force by States Oxford Scholarship Online [Internet]. 1963. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198251583.001.0001/acprof-9780198251583
112.
Cryer R. Aggression at the Court of Appeal. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 2005 Jun 1;10(2):209–30.
113.
Fernandez de Gurmendi SA. The Working Group on Aggression at the Prepatory Commission for the International Criminal Court,. Fordham International Law Journal [Internet]. 2001;25(3):589–605. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/frdint25&div=27&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults#563
114.
Fife RE. Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States. In: Human rights and criminal justice for the downtrodden: essays in honour of Asbjørn Eide. Leiden: Marinus Nijhoff; 2003.
115.
Glennon M. Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States. Yale Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2010;35(1):71–114. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil35&id=73&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil#73
116.
The German Chief Federal Prosecutor’s Decision Not to Investigate the Alleged Crime of Preparing Aggression against Iraq. Available from: http://jicj.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/1/245.full.pdf html
117.
Murphy SD. Aggression, Legitimacy and the International Criminal Court. European Journal of International Law. 2009 Nov 1;20(4):1147–56.
118.
Weigend T. ‘In general a principle of justice’: The Debate on the ‘Crime against Peace’ in the Wake of the Nuremberg Judgment. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Mar 1;10(1):41–58.
119.
BLOKKER N, KRESS C. A Consensus Agreement on the Crime of Aggression: Impressions from Kampala. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2010 Dec;23(04):889–95.
120.
SCHEFFER D. The Complex Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2010 Dec;23(04):897–904.
121.
Ellen O’Connell M, Niyazmatov M. What is Aggression?: Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Mar 1;10(1):189–207.
122.
Ellen O’Connell M, Niyazmatov M. What is Aggression?: Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Mar 1;10(1):189–207.
123.
Barriga S. Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression. In: The travaux preparatoires of the crime of aggression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
124.
A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression. The American Journal of International Law. 2011 Jul;105(3):517–33.
125.
Kress C, von Holtzendorff L. The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2010 Nov 1;8(5):1179–217.
126.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
127.
Cassese, Antonio. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
128.
Cassese, Antonio. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
129.
Ambos K. Superior Responsibility. In: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
130.
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., Reid, Natalie L. Forms of responsibility in international criminal law. Vol. International criminal law practitioner library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
131.
Clark RS. Drafting a General Part to a Penal Code: Some Thoughts Inspired by the Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and by the Court’s First Substantive Law Discussion in the Lubanga Dyilo Confirmation Proceedings. Criminal Law Forum. 2008 Dec;19(3–4):519–52.
132.
Esser A. Individual Criminal Responsibility. In: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
133.
Badar ME. The Mental Element In The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court: A Commentary From A Comparative Criminal Law Perspective. Criminal Law Forum. 2008 Dec;19(3–4):473–518.
134.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
135.
OHLIN JD, VAN SLIEDREGT E, WEIGEND T. Assessing the Control-Theory. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2013 Sep;26(03):725–46.
136.
STEWART JG. The End of ‘Modes of Liability’ for International Crimes. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2012 Mar;25(01):165–219.
137.
Cassese, Antonio. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
138.
Cassese, Antonio, Cassese, Antonio. Cassese’s International criminal law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
139.
Cassese A. The Proper Limits of Individual Responsibility under the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005 Nov 24;5(1):109–33.
140.
Black Letter Lawyering v. Constructive Interpretation. Journal of International Criminal Justice [Internet]. 2004;2(1):265–74. Available from: http://jicj.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/1/265.full.pdf+html
141.
Guilfoyle D. Responsibility for Collective Atrocities: Fair Labelling and Approaches to Commission in International Criminal Law. Current Legal Problems. 2011 Jan 1;64(1):255–86.
142.
Olasolo H. Joint Criminal Enterprise and Its Extended Form: a Theory of Co-Perpetration Giving Rise To Principal Liability, a Notion of Accessorial Liability, or a Form of Partnership In Crime? Criminal Law Forum. 2009 Jun;20(2–3):263–87.
143.
Olásolo H. Reflections on the Treatment of the Notions of Control of the Crime and Joint Criminal Enterprise in the Stakić Appeal Judgement. International Criminal Law Review. 2007 Jan 1;7(1):143–62.
144.
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., Reid, Natalie L. Forms of responsibility in international criminal law. Vol. International criminal law practitioner library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
145.
Clark RS. Drafting a General Part to a Penal Code: Some Thoughts Inspired by the Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and by the Court’s First Substantive Law Discussion in the Lubanga Dyilo Confirmation Proceedings. Criminal Law Forum. 2008 Dec;19(3–4):519–52.
146.
Esser A. Individual Criminal Responsibility. In: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
147.
Powles S. Joint Criminal Enterprise. Journal of International Criminal Justice [Internet]. 2004;2(2):606–19. Available from: http://jicj.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/2/606.full.pdf+html
148.
Weigend T. Intent, Mistake of Law, and Co-perpetration in the Lubanga Decision on Confirmation of Charges. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2008 Jul 1;6(3):471–87.
149.
van der Wilt HG. The Continuous Quest for Proper Modes of Criminal Responsibility. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2009 May 1;7(2):307–14.
150.
Ambos K. The Fujimori Judgment: A President’s Responsibility for Crimes Against Humanity as Indirect Perpetrator by Virtue of an Organized Power Apparatus. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011 Mar 1;9(1):137–58.
151.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
152.
Shlomit Wallerstein. Why English law should not incorporate the defence of superior orders. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2010;(2):109–26. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I6A3D6C60018611DFABAE877BF3307DF4&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
153.
Cryer R. Superior Scholarship on Superior Orders: An Appreciation of Yoram Dinstein’s The Defence of ‘Obedience to Superior Orders’ in International Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2011 Sep 1;9(4):959–72.
154.
Ambos K. Other Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility. In: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
155.
Cassese A. Justifications and Excuses in International Criminal Law. In: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
156.
Clark RS. The Mental Element in International Criminal Law: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Elements of Offences. Criminal Law Forum. 2001;12(3):291–334.
157.
Cryer, Robert. Prosecuting international crimes: selectivity and the international criminal law regime. Vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
158.
Anthony D’Amato. Superior Orders vs. Command Responsibility. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1986;80(3):604–8. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2201780
159.
Fichtelberg A. Liberal Values in International Criminal Law: A Critique of Erdemovic. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2008 Mar 1;6(1):3–19.
160.
Gaeta P. The defence of superior orders: the statute of International Criminal Court versus customary international law. European Journal of International Law. 1999 Jan 1;10(1):172–91.
161.
Peter Krug. The Emerging Mental Incapacity Defense in International Criminal Law: Some Initial Questions of Implementation. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2000;94(2):317–35. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2555295
162.
Kress C. War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflicts. Israel yearbook on human rights. 2000;
163.
Lippman M. Conundrums of Armed Conflict: Criminal Defenses to Violate of the Humanitarian Law of War. Dickinson Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1996;15(1):1–111. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/psilr15&id=9&collection=journals&index=journals/psilr#9
164.
Morss, John R. Banality of Justice: Reflections on Sierra Leone’s Special Court, The. Oregon Review of International Law [Internet]. 2006;8:1–30. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/porril8&id=11&collection=journals&index=journals/porril#11
165.
Defences before the international criminal court: Substantive grounds for excluding criminal responsibility – Part 1. International Criminal Law Review. 2001 Jan 1;1(1):111–72.
166.
Defences before the International Criminal Court: Substantive grounds for excluding criminal responsibility – Part 2. International Criminal Law Review. 2002 Feb 1;2(1):1–46.
167.
Rowe P. Duress as a Defence to War Crimes after Erdemović: A Laboratory for a Permanent Court? Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. 1998 Dec;1.
168.
Zimmermann A. Superior Orders. In: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
169.
Judgment. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1947;41(1):172–333. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2193873
170.
German War Trials: Judgment in Case of Lieutenants Dithmar and Boldt. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1922;16(4):708–24. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2187594
171.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
172.
Catani L. Victims at the International Criminal Court: Some Lessons Learned from the Lubanga Case. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Sep 1;10(4):905–22.
173.
Aptel C. Prosecutorial Discretion at the ICC and Victims’ Right to Remedy: Narrowing the Impunity Gap. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Dec 1;10(5):1357–75.
174.
Spiga V. No Redress without Justice: Victims and International Criminal Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2012 Dec 1;10(5):1377–94.
175.
Stahn C. Participation of Victims in Pre-Trial Proceedings of the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006 Apr 21;4(2):219–38.
176.
FRIMAN H. The International Criminal Court and Participation of Victims: A Third Party to the Proceedings? Leiden Journal of International Law. 2009 Sep;22(03).
177.
Jorda C, De Hemptinne J. The status and role of the victim. In: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
178.
Cryer, Robert. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
179.
SAUL B. Legislating from a Radical Hague: The United Nations Special Tribunal for Lebanon Invents an International Crime of Transnational Terrorism. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2011 Sep;24(03):677–700.
180.
Di Filippo M. Terrorist Crimes and International Co-operation: Critical Remarks on the Definition and Inclusion of Terrorism in the Category of International Crimes. European Journal of International Law. 2008 Jun 1;19(3):533–70.
181.
Joyner C. International Extradition and Global Terrorism: Bringing International Criminals to Justice. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review [Internet]. 2002;25(3):493–542. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/loyint25&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=28&men_tab=srchresults#501
182.
Mazandaran PA. An International Legal Response to an International Problem: Prosecuting International Terrorists. International Criminal Law Review. 2006 Nov 1;6(4):503–48.
183.
Orlova AV, Moore JW. Umbrellas or Building Blocks: Defining International Terrorism and Transnational Organized Crime in International Law. Houston journal of international law [Internet]. 2004;27(2):267–310. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hujil27&collection=journals&index=journals/hujil277&id=277#277
184.
Subedi SP. UN Response to International Terrorism in the Aftermath of of the Terrorist Attacks in America and the Problem of the Definition of Terrorism in International Law. International Community Law Review [Internet]. 2002;4(3):159–69. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlfddb4&id=169&collection=journals&index=journals/intlfddb#169
185.
Subedi SP. UN Response to International Terrorism in the Aftermath of of the Terrorist Attacks in America and the Problem of the Definition of Terrorism in International Law. International Community Law Review [Internet]. 2002;4(3):159–69. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlfddb4&id=169&collection=journals&index=journals/intlfddb#169
186.
Samuel M. Witten. The International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1998;92(4):774–81. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2998146
187.
Is Hijacking of Aircraft Piracy in International Law. The British yearbook of international law [Internet]. 1968;43:193–204. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint43&div=12&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults#201
