1.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., Ormston, R. eds: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2014).
2.
Barbour, Rosaline S.: Introducing qualitative research: a student’s guide. Sage (2014).
3.
Pope, C., Mays, N., Wiley InterScience (Online service): Qualitative research in health care. Blackwell Pub./BMJ Books, Malden, Mass (2006).
4.
Hussey, S.: Sickness certification system in the United Kingdom: qualitative study of views of general practitioners in Scotland. BMJ. 328, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.37949.656389.EE.
5.
Ormston et al., R.: Chapter 1: The foundations of qualitative research [In] Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. In: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. pp. 1–25. Sage, London (2013).
6.
Yardley, L.: Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health. 15, 215–228 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400302.
7.
Kelly, M.: The role of theory in qualitative health research. Family Practice. 27, 285–290 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmp077.
8.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S.: Chapter 6: Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited [In] The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. In: The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. pp. 97–128. SAGE, Los Angeles (2011).
9.
Richards, H., Emslie, C.: The ‘doctor’ or the ‘girl from the University’? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Family Practice. 17, 71–75 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/17.1.71.
10.
Britten, N.: Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ. 311, 251–253 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251.
11.
Song, M., Parker, D.: Commonality, difference and the dynamics of disclosure in in-depth interviewing. Sociology. 29, 241–256 (1995).
12.
Hoddinott, P.: Qualitative research interviewing by general practitioners. A personal view of the opportunities and pitfalls. Family Practice. 14, 307–312 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/14.4.307.
13.
Kvale, S.: Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry. 12, 480–500 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406286235.
14.
Lewis, Jane, Ritchie, Jane: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage, London (2003).
15.
Taylor, C.: Interviewing [In] Qualitative research in health care. In: Holloway, I. (ed.) Qualitative research in health care: edited by Immy Holloway. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2005).
16.
Kitzinger, J.: Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 311, 299–302 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
17.
Barbour, R.: Chapter 6: Focus Groups [In] Introducing qualitative research: a student’s guide. In: Introducing qualitative research: a student’s guide. Sage (2014).
18.
Wilkinson, S.: Focus Groups in Health Research: Exploring the Meanings of Health and Illness. Journal of Health Psychology. 3, 329–348 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539800300304.
19.
Bailey, J.: First steps in qualitative data analysis: transcribing. Family Practice. 25, 127–131 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn003.
20.
Pope, C., Ziebland, S., Mays, N.: Chapter 7: Analysing Qualitative Data. In: Qualitative research in health care. pp. 63–81. Blackwell Pub./BMJ Books, Malden, Mass (2006).
21.
Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., Marteau, T.: The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study. Sociology. 31, 597–606 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038597031003015.
22.
Barbour, R.S., WoReN, M. o.: Acquiring qualitative skills for primary care research. Review and reflections on a three-stage workshop. Part 2: analysing interview data. Family Practice. 17, 83–89 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/17.1.83.
23.
Barry, C.A., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., Stevenson, F.: Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research. 9, 26–44 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129121677.
24.
Charmaz, K.: The Power and Potential of Grounded Theory. Medical Sociology Online. 6, 2–15 (2012).
25.
Judith Green: Commentary: Grounded Theory and the Constant Comparative Method. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 316, (1998).
26.
Porter, M.: Chapter 4: ‘Second hand ethnography’: some problems in analyzing a feminist project [In] Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (1994).
27.
Seale, C., Silverman, D.: Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. The European Journal of Public Health. 7, 379–384 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/7.4.379.
28.
Ward, D.J., Furber, C., Tierney, S., Swallow, V.: Using Framework Analysis in nursing research: a worked example. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2423–2431 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12127.
29.
Wilkinson, S., Kitzinger, C.: Thinking differently about thinking positive: a discursive approach to cancer patients’ talk. Social Science & Medicine. 50, 797–811 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00337-8.
30.
Drew, P., Chatwin, J., Collins, S.: Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expectations. 4, 58–70 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00125.x.
31.
Example study protocol: Views on drinking and its consequences, https://moodle.ucl.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=1121997.
32.
Julia, B.: Writing qualitative papers for primary care journals, https://moodle.ucl.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=1122003.
33.
Maxwell, J.: Chapter 7: Designing a Qualitative Study. In: The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. pp. 214–253. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States (2009). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.
34.
K, H.: Chapter 4: Critical appraisal of qualitative research, http://methods.cochrane.org/qi/sites/methods.cochrane.org.qi/files/uploads/Chapter_Guidancecritical_appraisal.doc, (2011).
35.
Supplemental Handbook Guidance | Cochrane Methods Qualitative and Implementation, http://methods.cochrane.org/qi/supplemental-handbook-guidance.
36.
Greenhalgh, T., Taylor, R.: How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ. 315, 740–743 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7110.740.
37.
Liz, S.: Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence., https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/498322/a_quality_framework_tcm6-38740.pdf, (2003).
38.
Barbour, R.S.: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 322, 1115–1117 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.
39.
Blaxter, M.: Criteria for Qualitative Research. Medical Sociology News. 26, 34–37 (2000).
40.
Chapple, A.: Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the ‘soft’ option, or a form of sociological imperialism? Family Practice. 15, 556–561 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/15.6.556.
41.
Malterud, K.: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet. 358, 483–488 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.
42.
Yardley, L.: Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health. 15, 215–228 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400302.
43.
Hinton, L., Locock, L., Knight, M.: Maternal critical care: what can we learn from patient experience? A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 5, e006676–e006676 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006676.
44.
Marston, C., King, E.: Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review. The Lancet. 368, 1581–1586 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69662-1.
45.
Maftei, M., Tansley, L. eds: Writing creative non-fiction: determining the form. Gylphi Limited, Canterbury (2015).
46.
William Zinsser: On Writing Well. HarperCollins, New York (2006).
47.
Clark, R.P.: Writing tools: 50 essential strategies for every writer. Little, Brown, and Co, New York (2006).
48.
Albert, Tim: Winning the publications game: how to write a scientific paper without neglecting your patients. Radcliffe, Abingdon (2009).
49.
Albert, Tim: Write effectively: a quick course for busy health workers. Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford (2008).
50.
Silvia, P.J.: Write it up: practical strategies for writing and publishing journal articles. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2015).
51.
Silvia, P.J.: How to write a lot: a practical guide to productive academic writing. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2007).
52.
Sword, H.: Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2012).
53.
patter | research education, academic writing, public engagement, funding, other eccentricities., https://patthomson.net/.
54.
This Itch of Writing: Twenty Top Tips for Academic Writing, http://emmadarwin.typepad.com/thisitchofwriting/2013/05/twenty-top-tips-for-academic-writing.html.
