1.
Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers [Internet]. Second edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014. Available from: https://app.kortext.com/borrow/368936
2.
Barbour, Rosaline S. Introducing qualitative research: a student’s guide [Internet]. Second edition. Sage; 2014. Available from: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/introducing-qualitative-research
3.
Pope C, Mays N, Wiley InterScience (Online service). Qualitative research in health care [Internet]. 3rd ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub./BMJ Books; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470750841
4.
Hussey S. Sickness certification system in the United Kingdom: qualitative study of views of general practitioners in Scotland. BMJ. 2004 Jan 10;328(7431).
5.
Ormston et al. R. Chapter 1: The foundations of qualitative research [In] Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. In: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2013. p. 1–25. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6869d75e-0a31-e811-80cd-005056af4099
6.
Yardley L. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health. 2000;15(2):215–28.
7.
Kelly M. The role of theory in qualitative health research. Family Practice. 2010;27(3):285–90.
8.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Chapter 6: Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited [In] The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. In: The SAGE handbook of qualitative research [Internet]. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2011. p. 97–128. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=dbd9660f-7c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
9.
Richards H, Emslie C. The ‘doctor’ or the ‘girl from the University’? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Family Practice. 2000;17(1):71–5.
10.
Britten N. Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ. 1995;311(6999):251–3.
11.
Song M, Parker D. Commonality, difference and the dynamics of disclosure in in-depth interviewing. Sociology [Internet]. 1995;29(2):241–56. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855549
12.
Hoddinott P. Qualitative research interviewing by general practitioners. A personal view of the opportunities and pitfalls. Family Practice. 1997 Aug 1;14(4):307–12.
13.
Kvale S. Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry. 2006 June 1;12(3):480–500.
14.
Lewis, Jane, Ritchie, Jane. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
15.
Taylor C. Interviewing [In] Qualitative research in health care. In: Holloway I, editor. Qualitative research in health care: edited by Immy Holloway [Internet]. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780335225798
16.
Kitzinger J. Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311(7000):299–302.
17.
Barbour R. Chapter 6: Focus Groups [In] Introducing qualitative research: a student’s guide. In: Introducing qualitative research: a student’s guide [Internet]. Second edition. Sage; 2014. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/introducing-qualitative-research/SAGE.xml
18.
Wilkinson S. Focus Groups in Health Research: Exploring the Meanings of Health and Illness. Journal of Health Psychology. 1998 July 1;3(3):329–48.
19.
Bailey J. First steps in qualitative data analysis: transcribing. Family Practice. 2008 Feb 27;25(2):127–31.
20.
Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Chapter 7: Analysing Qualitative Data. In: Qualitative research in health care [Internet]. 3rd ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub./BMJ Books; 2006. p. 63–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470750841
21.
Armstrong D, Gosling A, Weinman J, Marteau T. The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study. Sociology. 1997 Aug 1;31(3):597–606.
22.
Barbour RS, WoReN M o. Acquiring qualitative skills for primary care research. Review and reflections on a three-stage workshop. Part 2: analysing interview data. Family Practice. 2000 Feb 1;17(1):83–9.
23.
Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C, Stevenson F. Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research. 1999;9(1):26–44.
24.
Charmaz K. The Power and Potential of Grounded Theory. Medical Sociology Online. 2012;6(3):2–15.
25.
Judith Green. Commentary: Grounded Theory and the Constant Comparative Method. BMJ: British Medical Journal [Internet]. 1998;316(7137). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25178803
26.
Porter M. Chapter 4: ‘Second hand ethnography’: some problems in analyzing a feminist project [In] Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing qualitative data [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 1994. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413081
27.
Seale C, Silverman D. Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. The European Journal of Public Health. 1997;7(4):379–84.
28.
Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S, Swallow V. Using Framework Analysis in nursing research: a worked example. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013;2423–31.
29.
Wilkinson S, Kitzinger C. Thinking differently about thinking positive: a discursive approach to cancer patients’ talk. Social Science & Medicine. 2000;50(6):797–811.
30.
Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S. Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expectations. 2001;4(1):58–70.
31.
Example study protocol: Views on drinking and its consequences [Internet]. Available from: https://moodle.ucl.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=1121997
32.
Julia B. Writing qualitative papers for primary care journals [Internet]. Available from: https://moodle.ucl.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=1122003
33.
Maxwell J. Chapter 7: Designing a Qualitative Study. In: The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods [Internet]. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States : SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2009. p. 214–53. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n7
34.
K H. Chapter 4: Critical appraisal of qualitative research [Internet]. Version 1. J N, A B, K H, A H, J H, S L, et al., editors. Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2011. Available from: http://methods.cochrane.org/qi/sites/methods.cochrane.org.qi/files/uploads/Chapter_Guidancecritical_appraisal.doc
35.
Supplemental Handbook Guidance | Cochrane Methods Qualitative and Implementation [Internet]. Available from: http://methods.cochrane.org/qi/supplemental-handbook-guidance
36.
Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ. 1997 Sept 20;315(7110):740–3.
37.
Liz S. Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. [Internet]. London: Cabinet Office, Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office; 2003. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/498322/a_quality_framework_tcm6-38740.pdf
38.
Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001;322(7294):1115–7.
39.
Blaxter M. Criteria for Qualitative Research. Medical Sociology News [Internet]. 2000;26(2):34–7. Available from: http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org/resources/MSo-&-MSN-Archive/MSN_v.26/MSNVol26No2.pdf
40.
Chapple A. Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the ‘soft’ option, or a form of sociological imperialism? Family Practice. 1998;15(6):556–61.
41.
Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–8.
42.
Yardley L. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health. 2000;15(2):215–28.
43.
Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M. Maternal critical care: what can we learn from patient experience? A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 27;5(4):e006676–e006676.
44.
Marston C, King E. Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review. The Lancet [Internet]. 2006 Nov;368(9547):1581–6. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673606696621
45.
Maftei M, Tansley L, editors. Writing creative non-fiction: determining the form. Canterbury: Gylphi Limited; 2015.
46.
William Zinsser. On Writing Well. New York: HarperCollins; 2006.
47.
Clark RP. Writing tools: 50 essential strategies for every writer. New York: Little, Brown, and Co; 2006.
48.
Albert, Tim. Winning the publications game: how to write a scientific paper without neglecting your patients. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Radcliffe; 2009.
49.
Albert, Tim. Write effectively: a quick course for busy health workers. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2008.
50.
Silvia PJ. Write it up: practical strategies for writing and publishing journal articles. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2015.
51.
Silvia PJ. How to write a lot: a practical guide to productive academic writing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2007.
52.
Sword H. Stylish academic writing [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2012. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=464125
53.
patter | research education, academic writing, public engagement, funding, other eccentricities. [Internet]. Available from: https://patthomson.net/
54.
This Itch of Writing: Twenty Top Tips for Academic Writing [Internet]. Available from: http://emmadarwin.typepad.com/thisitchofwriting/2013/05/twenty-top-tips-for-academic-writing.html