1
Maveety N. The pioneers of judicial behavior [electronic resource]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2003.
2
Sheldon Goldman. Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited. The American Political Science Review. 1975;69:491–506.
3
Epstein L, Knight J. A Strategic Account of Judicial Decision-Making. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press 1998.
4
Feeley M, Rubin EL. Judicial Policy-Making and the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
5
Cameron C, Cummings C. Diversity and Judicial Decision-Making: Evidence from Affirmative Action Cases in the Federal Courts of Appeal 1971-1999.
6
Review by: Anne Bloom. The ‘Post-Attitudinal Moment’: Judicial Policymaking through the Lens of New Institutionalism. Law & Society Review. 2001;35:219–30.
7
Baum, Lawrence. Judges and their audiences: a perspective on judicial behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2006.
8
Schauer F. Is There a Psychology of Judging? The psychology of judicial decision making. New York: Oxford University Press 2010.
9
Sunstein CR. Are Judges Conformists Too? Why societies need dissent. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 2003.
10
Knight J. Are Empiricists Asking the Right Questions about Judicial Decisionmaking. Duke law journal. 2009;58:1531–56.
11
Baum L. Motivation and Judicial Behaviour: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry. The psychology of judicial decision making. New York: Oxford University Press 2010.
12
Powell, HJ. A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR KNIGHT, ARE EMPIRICISTS ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS ABOUT JUDICIAL DECISIONMAKING?
13
Guarnieri, Carlo, Pederzoli, Patrizia, Thomas, C. A., et al. The power of judges: a comparative study of courts and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
14
Guarnieri C, Pederzoli P, Thomas CA. The Judicial System. The power of judges: a comparative study of courts and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
15
Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging. The psychology of judicial decision making. New York: Oxford University Press 2010.
16
Klein, David E., Mitchell, Gregory. The psychology of judicial decision making. New York: Oxford University Press 2010.
17
Vidmar N. A Historical and Comparative Perspective on the Common Law Jury. World jury systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
18
Cheryl Thomas. Exposing the myths of jury service. Criminal Law Review. 2008;415–30.
19
Thomas C. Are juries fair. London%20%3A: Ministry%20of%20Justice%2C 2010.
20
Lord Chief Justice. Judges, Tribunals and Magistrates | 2010 | NI Judicial Studies Board Lecture, Belfast: Jury trials. http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/speeches/2010/speech-by-lcj-jsb-lecture-jury-trials
21
Sutton Trust. Research - Sutton Trust. http://www.suttontrust.com/our-work/research/item/law-educational-backgrounds/
22
Thomas C. Review of Judicial Diversity in the UK and Other Jurisdictions: parts 1 and 2. Published Online First: 2006.
23
Hale B. The Appointment and Removal of Judges: Independence and Diversity. International Association of Women Judges. Published Online First: 2006.
24
Genn, Hazel. The attractiveness of senior judicial appointment to highly qualified practitioners: report to the Judicial Executive Board. Published Online First: 2008.
25
House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution. Judicial Appointments Process - UK Parliament. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/inquiries/judicial-appointments-process/
26
House of Lords, Select Committee on the Constitution. Judicial Appointments: 25th Report of Session. 2010.
27
Judith R. Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure. 26 Cardozo Law Review 597. Published Online First: 2005.
28
Farber D, Sherry S. Building a Better Judiciary. The psychology of judicial decision making. New York: Oxford University Press 2010.
29
Prashar U. Translating Aspirations into Reality: Establishing the Judicial Appointments Commission. Judicial appointments: balancing independence, accountability and legitimacy. S.I.: s.n. 2010.
30
Sumption J. The Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Judicial appointments: balancing independence, accountability and legitimacy. S.I.: s.n. 2010.
31
Sedley, Stephen. When should a judge not be a judge? London Review of Books. Published Online First: 6 January 2011.
32
Geyh CG. The Dimensions of Judicial Impartiality. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published Online First: 2012. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2016522
33
Wistrich A. Defining Good Judging. The psychology of judicial decision making. New York: Oxford University Press 2010.
34
Hickinbottom G. What Makes a Good Judge. Judicial appointments: balancing independence, accountability and legitimacy. S.I.: s.n. 2010.
35
Sedley S. Judicial Politics. London Review of Books. 2012;34.
36
Sentencing guidelines in England and Wales: an evolutionary approach. London: Sentencing Commission Working Group 2008.
37
Roberts JV. Sentencing Guidelines and Judicial Discretion: Evolution of the Duty of Courts to Comply in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology. 2011;51:997–1013. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azr044
38
Jacobson, Jessica. Mitigation: the role of personal factors in sentencing. London: Prison Reform Trust 2007.
39
Austin Lovegrove. Public opinion, sentencing and lenience: an empirical study involving judges consulting the community. Criminal Law Review. 2007;769–81.
40
Judge SI. The Sentencing Decision. 2005.
41
Gibb F. Judges fear prisons will burst under new rules. The Times. Published Online First: 2010.
42
Callaway E. Justice may be hard-wired into the human brain. New Scientist. Published Online First: 2008.
43
Judges, Tribunals and Magistrates | 2012 | The Queen (on the application of Tony Nicklinson) -v- Ministry of Justice. http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/judgments/2012/tony-nicklinson-judgment-16082012
44
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). R. v. Twomey. 2009.
45
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). R. v Thompson (Benjamin)R. v Crawford (Jason)R. v Gomulu (Ahmed)R. v Allen (Christopher)R. v Blake (David)R. v Kasunga (Kamulete). 2010.
46
Dwoell K. Dinah Rose QC hailed for actions that led her to apologise in torture hearing. Lawyer. 2010;24.
47
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber). Taxquet v Belgium (926/05). 16 AD.
48
King’s Bench Division. R. v Sussex Justices Ex p. McCarthy. 1924.
49
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). R. v Hughes (Michael). 17 AD.
50
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs EWCA Civ 65. 2010.
51
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs(Approved Judgment) EWCA Civ 158. 2010.
52
Norton-Taylor R. Judges ‘irresponsible’ for wanting CIA torture files disclosed. The Guardian. Published Online First: 2009.
53
Aston J, Gordon C. Minister’s lawyers attack ‘torture’ case judges The Independent. The Independent. Published Online First: 2008.
54
Hirsch ARBIC, Booth R, Cobain I. Government fury after judges attack security services. The Guardian. Published Online First: 2010.
55
Gibb F. Supreme ambition, jealousy and outrage. The Times. Published Online First: 2010.