[1]
N. Maveety, The pioneers of judicial behavior [electronic resource]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003.
[2]
Sheldon Goldman, ‘Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 491–506, 1975 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1959082
[3]
L. Epstein and J. Knight, ‘A Strategic Account of Judicial Decision-Making’, in The Choices Justices Make, Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 1998.
[4]
M. Feeley and E. L. Rubin, Judicial Policy-Making and the Modern State, vol. Cambridge criminology series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[5]
C. Cameron and C. Cummings, ‘Diversity and Judicial Decision-Making: Evidence from Affirmative Action Cases in the Federal Courts of Appeal 1971-1999’.
[6]
Review by: Anne Bloom, ‘The “Post-Attitudinal Moment”: Judicial Policymaking through the Lens of New Institutionalism’, Law & Society Review, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 219–230, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3185391
[7]
Baum, Lawrence, Judges and their audiences: a perspective on judicial behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006.
[8]
F. Schauer, ‘Is There a Psychology of Judging?’, in The psychology of judicial decision making, vol. American Psychology-Law Society series, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[9]
C. R. Sunstein, ‘Are Judges Conformists Too?’, in Why societies need dissent, vol. Oliver Wendell Holmes lectures, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctv1pncntj.12
[10]
J. Knight, ‘Are Empiricists Asking the Right Questions about Judicial Decisionmaking’, Duke law journal, vol. 58, pp. 1531–1556, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol58/iss7/9/
[11]
L. Baum, ‘Motivation and Judicial Behaviour: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry’, in The psychology of judicial decision making, vol. American Psychology-Law Society series, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[12]
Powell, HJ, ‘A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR KNIGHT, ARE EMPIRICISTS ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS ABOUT JUDICIAL DECISIONMAKING?’ [Online]. Available: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol58/iss7/
[13]
Guarnieri, Carlo, Pederzoli, Patrizia, Thomas, C. A., and European Secretariat for Scientific Publications, The power of judges: a comparative study of courts and democracy, vol. Oxford socio-legal studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298359.001.0001
[14]
C. Guarnieri, P. Pederzoli, and C. A. Thomas, ‘The Judicial System’, in The power of judges: a comparative study of courts and democracy, vol. Oxford socio-legal studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298359.001.0001
[15]
‘Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging’, in The psychology of judicial decision making, vol. American Psychology-Law Society series, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[16]
Klein, David E. and Mitchell, Gregory, The psychology of judicial decision making, vol. American Psychology-Law Society series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.001.0001
[17]
N. Vidmar, ‘A Historical and Comparative Perspective on the Common Law Jury’, in World jury systems, vol. Oxford socio-legal studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298564.001.0001
[18]
Cheryl Thomas, ‘Exposing the myths of jury service’, Criminal Law Review, no. 6, pp. 415–430, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I11381A7114F711DD9CE4E82430A3B777/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[19]
C. Thomas, Are juries fair. London%20%3A: Ministry%20of%20Justice%2C, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Are%20juries%20fair&sort-order=rank&rn=1
[20]
Lord Chief Justice, ‘Judges, Tribunals and Magistrates | 2010 | NI Judicial Studies Board Lecture, Belfast: Jury trials’. [Online]. Available: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/speeches/2010/speech-by-lcj-jsb-lecture-jury-trials
[21]
Sutton Trust, ‘Research - Sutton Trust’. [Online]. Available: http://www.suttontrust.com/our-work/research/item/law-educational-backgrounds/
[22]
C. Thomas, ‘Review of Judicial Diversity in the UK and Other Jurisdictions: parts 1 and 2’, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/judicial-institute/publications.html
[23]
B. Hale, ‘The Appointment and Removal of Judges: Independence and Diversity’, International Association of Women Judges, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.iawj.org/InternationalConferences.html
[24]
Genn, Hazel., ‘The attractiveness of senior judicial appointment to highly qualified practitioners: report to the Judicial Executive Board’, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=The%20attractiveness%20of%20senior%20judicial%20appointment%20to%20highly%20qualified%20practitioners&sort-order=rank&rn=1
[25]
House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution, ‘Judicial Appointments Process - UK Parliament’. [Online]. Available: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/inquiries/judicial-appointments-process/
[26]
House of Lords and Select Committee on the Constitution, ‘Judicial Appointments: 25th Report of Session’. Dec. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/publications/
[27]
R. Judith, ‘Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure’, 26 Cardozo Law Review 597, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/759/
[28]
D. Farber and S. Sherry, ‘Building a Better Judiciary’, in The psychology of judicial decision making, vol. American Psychology-Law Society series, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[29]
U. Prashar, ‘Translating Aspirations into Reality: Establishing the Judicial Appointments Commission’, in Judicial appointments: balancing independence, accountability and legitimacy, S.I.: s.n., 2010 [Online]. Available: http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Judicial%2520Appointments%253A%2520Independence%252C%2520Accountability%2520and%2520Legitimacy&sort-order=rank&rn=1
[30]
J. Sumption, ‘The Constitutional Reform Act 2005’, in Judicial appointments: balancing independence, accountability and legitimacy, S.I.: s.n., 2010 [Online]. Available: http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Judicial%2520Appointments%253A%2520Independence%252C%2520Accountability%2520and%2520Legitimacy&sort-order=rank&rn=1
[31]
Sedley, Stephen, ‘When should a judge not be a judge?’, London Review of Books, Jan. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.lrb.co.uk/contributors/stephen-sedley
[32]
C. G. Geyh, ‘The Dimensions of Judicial Impartiality’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2016522.
[33]
A. Wistrich, ‘Defining Good Judging’, in The psychology of judicial decision making, vol. American Psychology-Law Society series, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[34]
G. Hickinbottom, ‘What Makes a Good Judge’, in Judicial appointments: balancing independence, accountability and legitimacy., S.I.: s.n., 2010 [Online]. Available: http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Judicial%2520Appointments%253A%2520Balancing&sort-order=rank&rn=1
[35]
S. Sedley, ‘Judicial Politics’, London Review of Books, vol. 34, no. 4, Feb. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.lrb.co.uk/contributors/stephen-sedley
[36]
Sentencing guidelines in England and Wales: an evolutionary approach. London: Sentencing Commission Working Group, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/1878814?style=html&title=Sentencing%20guidelines%20in%20England%20and%20Walesan%20evolutionary
[37]
J. V. Roberts, ‘Sentencing Guidelines and Judicial Discretion: Evolution of the Duty of Courts to Comply in England and Wales’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 997–1013, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1093/bjc/azr044.
[38]
Jacobson, Jessica, Mitigation: the role of personal factors in sentencing. London: Prison Reform Trust, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/24551221?style=html&title=Mitigationthe%20role%20of%20personal%20factors%20in%20sentencing
[39]
Austin Lovegrove, ‘Public opinion, sentencing and lenience: an empirical study involving judges consulting the community’, Criminal Law Review, no. Oct, pp. 769–781, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I393E8AB1529F11DCB2ABCD1148869588/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[40]
S. I. Judge, ‘The Sentencing Decision’, 2005.
[41]
F. Gibb, ‘Judges fear prisons will burst under new rules’, The Times, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y08-2FX0-Y9M1-H0N5&csi=10939&oc=00240&perma=true
[42]
E. Callaway, ‘Justice may be hard-wired into the human brain’, New Scientist, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16256-justice-may-be-hardwired-into-the-human-brain.html#.Umk0Olv1D6U
[43]
‘Judges, Tribunals and Magistrates | 2012 | The Queen (on the application of Tony Nicklinson) -v- Ministry of Justice’. [Online]. Available: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/judgments/2012/tony-nicklinson-judgment-16082012
[44]
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), R. v. Twomey. 2009 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I72178E105D4011DE87E28F67B42D8222/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[45]
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), R. v Thompson (Benjamin)R. v Crawford (Jason)R. v Gomulu (Ahmed)R. v Allen (Christopher)R. v Blake (David)R. v Kasunga (Kamulete). 2010 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IB1183210905F11DFA138B71712AA6103/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[46]
K. Dwoell, ‘Dinah Rose QC hailed for actions that led her to apologise in torture hearing’, Lawyer, vol. 24, no. 8, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=49868416&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[47]
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber), Taxquet v Belgium (926/05). 16AD [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6A0C1310836411E1BC298D03BAA33194/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[48]
King’s Bench Division, R. v Sussex Justices Ex p. McCarthy. 1924 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I6D7D1670E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[49]
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), R. v Hughes (Michael). 17AD [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I30DBAEE09D2111E09B45D883AEA2A88A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[50]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs EWCA Civ 65. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IDC00550016C211DF970C9D47B1B6D882&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[51]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs(Approved Judgment) EWCA Civ 158. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7ABDB6D0235511DFB9AA9F265CBD0413&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[52]
R. Norton-Taylor, ‘Judges “irresponsible” for wanting CIA torture files disclosed’, The Guardian, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7X9Y-P7V1-2R54-209J&csi=138620&oc=00240&perma=true
[53]
J. Aston and C. Gordon, ‘Minister’s lawyers attack “torture” case judges The Independent’, The Independent, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ministers-lawyers-attack-torture-case-judges-1840649.html
[54]
A. R. B. I. C. Hirsch, R. Booth, and I. Cobain, ‘Government fury after judges attack security services’, The Guardian, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XXC-R5N1-2R54-201V&csi=138620&oc=00240&perma=true
[55]
F. Gibb, ‘Supreme ambition, jealousy and outrage’, The Times, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XPT-31W0-Y9M1-H0CN&csi=10939&oc=00240&perma=true