Aston, John, and Cathy Gordon. ‘Minister’s Lawyers Attack “torture” Case Judges The Independent’. The Independent (2008): n. pag. Web. <http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ministers-lawyers-attack-torture-case-judges-1840649.html>.
Austin Lovegrove. ‘Public Opinion, Sentencing and Lenience: An Empirical Study Involving Judges Consulting the Community’. Criminal Law Review Oct (2007): 769–781. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I393E8AB1529F11DCB2ABCD1148869588/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.
Baum, L. ‘Motivation and Judicial Behaviour: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry’. The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making. American Psychology-Law Society series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>.
Baum, Lawrence. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006. Print.
Callaway, Ewen. ‘Justice May Be Hard-Wired into the Human Brain’. New Scientist (2008): n. pag. Web. <http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16256-justice-may-be-hardwired-into-the-human-brain.html#.Umk0Olv1D6U>.
Cameron, C., and C. Cummings. ‘Diversity and Judicial Decision-Making: Evidence from Affirmative Action Cases in the Federal Courts of Appeal 1971-1999’. n. pag. Print.
Cheryl Thomas. ‘Exposing the Myths of Jury Service’. Criminal Law Review 6 (2008): 415–430. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I11381A7114F711DD9CE4E82430A3B777/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs EWCA Civ 65. N.p., 2010. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IDC00550016C211DF970C9D47B1B6D882&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs(Approved Judgment) EWCA Civ 158. N.p., 2010. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7ABDB6D0235511DFB9AA9F265CBD0413&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). R. v Hughes (Michael). N.p., 17AD. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I30DBAEE09D2111E09B45D883AEA2A88A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.
---. R. v Thompson (Benjamin)R. v Crawford (Jason)R. v Gomulu (Ahmed)R. v Allen (Christopher)R. v Blake (David)R. v Kasunga (Kamulete). N.p., 2010. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IB1183210905F11DFA138B71712AA6103/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.
---. R. v. Twomey. N.p., 2009. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I72178E105D4011DE87E28F67B42D8222/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.
Dwoell, Katy. ‘Dinah Rose QC Hailed for Actions That Led Her to Apologise in Torture Hearing’. Lawyer 24.8 (2010): n. pag. Web. <https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=49868416&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451>.
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. ‘A Strategic Account of Judicial Decision-Making’. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 1998. Print.
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber). Taxquet v Belgium (926/05). N.p., 16AD. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6A0C1310836411E1BC298D03BAA33194/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.
Farber, D., and S. Sherry. ‘Building a Better Judiciary’. The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making. American Psychology-Law Society series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>.
Feeley, Malcolm, and Edward L. Rubin. Judicial Policy-Making and the Modern State. Cambridge criminology series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Print.
Genn, Hazel. ‘The Attractiveness of Senior Judicial Appointment to Highly Qualified Practitioners: Report to the Judicial Executive Board’. (2008): n. pag. Web. <http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=The%20attractiveness%20of%20senior%20judicial%20appointment%20to%20highly%20qualified%20practitioners&sort-order=rank&rn=1>.
Geyh, Charles G. ‘The Dimensions of Judicial Impartiality’. SSRN Electronic Journal (2012): n. pag. Web.
Gibb, Frances. ‘Judges Fear Prisons Will Burst under New Rules’. The Times (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y08-2FX0-Y9M1-H0N5&csi=10939&oc=00240&perma=true>.
Gibb, Francis. ‘Supreme Ambition, Jealousy and Outrage’. The Times (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XPT-31W0-Y9M1-H0CN&csi=10939&oc=00240&perma=true>.
Guarnieri, Carlo et al. The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy. Oxford socio-legal studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298359.001.0001>.
Guarnieri, Carlo, Patrizia Pederzoli, and C.A. Thomas. ‘The Judicial System’. The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy. Oxford socio-legal studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298359.001.0001>.
Hale, B. ‘The Appointment and Removal of Judges: Independence and Diversity’. International Association of Women Judges (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://www.iawj.org/InternationalConferences.html>.
Hickinbottom, G. ‘What Makes a Good Judge’. Judicial Appointments: Balancing Independence, Accountability and Legitimacy. S.I.: s.n., 2010. Web. <http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Judicial%2520Appointments%253A%2520Balancing&sort-order=rank&rn=1>.
Hirsch, Afua Robert Booth Ian Cobain, Robert Booth, and Ian Cobain. ‘Government Fury after Judges Attack Security Services’. The Guardian (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XXC-R5N1-2R54-201V&csi=138620&oc=00240&perma=true>.
House of Lords, and Select Committee on the Constitution. ‘Judicial Appointments: 25th Report of Session’. Dec. 2010. Web. <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/publications/>.
House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution. ‘Judicial Appointments Process - UK Parliament’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/inquiries/judicial-appointments-process/>.
Jacobson, Jessica. Mitigation: The Role of Personal Factors in Sentencing. London: Prison Reform Trust, 2007. Web. <http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/24551221?style=html&title=Mitigationthe%20role%20of%20personal%20factors%20in%20sentencing>.
Judge, Sir Igor. ‘The Sentencing Decision’. (2005): n. pag. Print.
‘Judges, Tribunals and Magistrates | 2012 | The Queen (on the Application of Tony Nicklinson) -v- Ministry of Justice’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/judgments/2012/tony-nicklinson-judgment-16082012>.
Judith, Resnik. ‘Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure’. 26 Cardozo Law Review 597 (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/759/>.
King’s Bench Division. R. v Sussex Justices Ex p. McCarthy. N.p., 1924. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I6D7D1670E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
Klein, David E. and Mitchell, Gregory. The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making. American Psychology-Law Society series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.001.0001>.
Knight, Jack. ‘Are Empiricists Asking the Right Questions about Judicial Decisionmaking’. Duke law journal 58 (2009): 1531–1556. Web. <http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol58/iss7/9/>.
Lord Chief Justice. ‘Judges, Tribunals and Magistrates | 2010 | NI Judicial Studies Board Lecture, Belfast: Jury Trials’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/speeches/2010/speech-by-lcj-jsb-lecture-jury-trials>.
Maveety, Nancy. The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior [Electronic Resource]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003. Print.
‘Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging’. The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making. American Psychology-Law Society series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>.
Norton-Taylor, Richard. ‘Judges “irresponsible” for Wanting CIA Torture Files Disclosed’. The Guardian (2009): n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7X9Y-P7V1-2R54-209J&csi=138620&oc=00240&perma=true>.
Powell, HJ. ‘A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR KNIGHT, ARE EMPIRICISTS ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS ABOUT JUDICIAL DECISIONMAKING?’ n. pag. Web. <http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol58/iss7/>.
Prashar, U. ‘Translating Aspirations into Reality: Establishing the Judicial Appointments Commission’. Judicial Appointments: Balancing Independence, Accountability and Legitimacy. S.I.: s.n., 2010. Web. <http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Judicial%2520Appointments%253A%2520Independence%252C%2520Accountability%2520and%2520Legitimacy&sort-order=rank&rn=1>.
Review by: Anne Bloom. ‘The “Post-Attitudinal Moment”: Judicial Policymaking through the Lens of New Institutionalism’. Law & Society Review 35.1 (2001): 219–230. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3185391>.
Roberts, J. V. ‘Sentencing Guidelines and Judicial Discretion: Evolution of the Duty of Courts to Comply in England and Wales’. British Journal of Criminology 51.6 (2011): 997–1013. Web.
Schauer, F. ‘Is There a Psychology of Judging?’ The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making. American Psychology-Law Society series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>.
Sedley, Stephen. ‘Judicial Politics’. London Review of Books 34.4 (2012): n. pag. Web. <http://www.lrb.co.uk/contributors/stephen-sedley>.
Sedley, Stephen. ‘When Should a Judge Not Be a Judge?’ London Review of Books (2011): n. pag. Web. <http://www.lrb.co.uk/contributors/stephen-sedley>.
Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Sentencing Commission Working Group, 2008. Web. <http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/1878814?style=html&title=Sentencing%20guidelines%20in%20England%20and%20Walesan%20evolutionary>.
Sheldon Goldman. ‘Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited’. The American Political Science Review 69.2 (1975): 491–506. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1959082>.
Sumption, J. ‘The Constitutional Reform Act 2005’. Judicial Appointments: Balancing Independence, Accountability and Legitimacy. S.I.: s.n., 2010. Web. <http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Judicial%2520Appointments%253A%2520Independence%252C%2520Accountability%2520and%2520Legitimacy&sort-order=rank&rn=1>.
Sunstein, Cass R. ‘Are Judges Conformists Too?’ Why Societies Need Dissent. Oliver Wendell Holmes lectures. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2003. Web. <https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctv1pncntj.12>.
Sutton Trust. ‘Research - Sutton Trust’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.suttontrust.com/our-work/research/item/law-educational-backgrounds/>.
Thomas, C. ‘Review of Judicial Diversity in the UK and Other Jurisdictions: Parts 1 and 2’. (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/judicial-institute/publications.html>.
Thomas, Cheryl. Are Juries Fair. London%20%3A: Ministry%20of%20Justice%2C, 2010. Web. <http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Are%20juries%20fair&sort-order=rank&rn=1>.
Vidmar, N. ‘A Historical and Comparative Perspective on the Common Law Jury’. World Jury Systems. Oxford socio-legal studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Web. <https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298564.001.0001>.
Wistrich, A. ‘Defining Good Judging’. The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making. American Psychology-Law Society series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14455024690004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>.
