1.
Fahmy S. Picturing Afghan Women: A Content Analysis of AP Wire Photographs During the Taliban Regime and after the Fall of the Taliban Regime. International Communication Gazette. 2004;66(2):91-112. doi:10.1177/0016549204041472
2.
Billaud, Julie. Visible under the Veil: Dissimulation, performance and agency in an Islamic public space. Journal of International Women’s Studies, suppl Special Issue: Gender and Islam in Asia. 11:120-135. https://search.proquest.com/docview/232179263?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
3.
Shepherd LJ. Veiled references: Constructions of gender in the Bush administration discourse on the attacks on Afghanistan post-9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2006;8(1):19-41. doi:10.1080/14616740500415425
4.
Sarah Riley, et al. Coming Up with a Research Question. In: Sarah Riley, Cath Sullivan, Stephen Gibson, eds. Doing Your Qualitative Psychology Project. SAGE Publications; 2012:23-26. http://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-your-qualitative-psychology-project
5.
Lene Hansen. Ontologies, epistemologies, methodologies. In: Shepherd L, ed. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Routledge; :42-51. doi:10.4324/9781315879819
6.
Sabaratnam M. IR in Dialogue … but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011;39(3):781-803. doi:10.1177/0305829811404270
7.
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Objectivity and Values. In: Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:54-78.
8.
Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203854907
9.
Jackson PT. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Routledge; 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203843321
10.
Jackson PT. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Second edition. Routledge; 2016.
11.
Belsey C. Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press; 2002.
12.
Michel Foucault. Truth and Power. In: The Foucault Reader. Penguin; 1991:51-75. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8cd663f8-de02-e911-80cd-005056af4099
13.
Hacking I. The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press; 1999.
14.
Kratochwil F. Constructivism: what it is (not) and how it matters. In: Della Porta D, Keating M, eds. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press; 2008:80-98. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801938.006
15.
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press; 1994.
16.
Smith RM. Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? Political Science & Politics. 2002;35(02):199-201. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/should-we-make-political-science-more-of-a-science-or-more-about-politics/6B149CA2D34B349B68753E0953534FEC
17.
Laitin DD. The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society. 2003;31(1):163-184. doi:10.1177/0032329202250167
18.
Rose Wiles. Thinking ethically: approaches to research ethics. In: What Are Qualitative Research Ethics?. Bloomsbury; 2013:9-24. doi:10.5040/9781849666558.ch-002
19.
Rose G. Understanding Visual Research Ethics. In: Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 5th edition. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2023:94-110. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2038408
20.
How people feel about what companies do with their data is just as important as what they know about it: LSE Impact Blog. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/03/29/how-people-feel-about-what-companies-do-with-their-data-is-just-as-important-as-what-they-know-about-it/
21.
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. Designing for Trustworthiness: Knowledge Claims and Evaluations of Interpretive Research. In: Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. Routledge; 2012:105-128. doi:10.4324/9780203854907
22.
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. Design in Context: From the Human Side of Research to Writing Research Manuscripts. In: Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. Routledge; 2013:129-143. doi:10.4324/9780203854907
23.
Hope Alkon A. Reflexivity and Environmental Justice Scholarship: A Role for Feminist Methodologies. Organization & Environment. 2011;24(2):130-149. doi:10.1177/1096026611414347
24.
Schwartz-Shea P, Yanow D. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. Routledge; 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203854907
25.
Sandercock L, Attili G. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice. 2010;11(1):23-45. doi:10.1080/14649350903538012
26.
Conti JA, O’Neil M. Studying power: qualitative methods and the global elite. Qualitative Research. 2007;7(1):63-82. doi:10.1177/1468794107071421
27.
Tom Clark. ‘We’re Over-Researched Here!’ Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within Qualitative Research Engagements. Sociology. 2008;42(5):953-970. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42857198?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
28.
Hammersley M. On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research. 2014;14(5):529-541. doi:10.1177/1468794113495039
29.
Fujii LA. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2012;45(04):717-723. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/research-ethics-101-dilemmas-and-responsibilities/90D5442392CD0716F04E764939054FF7
30.
Lundy P, McGovern M. The ethics of silence. Action Research. 2006;4(1):49-64. doi:10.1177/1476750306060542
31.
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. What is data? In: Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:168-187.
32.
Coleman S. Spaces of Disappearance. In: How Voters Feel. Cambridge University Press; 2012:149-168. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139035354.007
33.
Hutchison E. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology. 2014;8(1):1-19. doi:10.1111/ips.12037
34.
Geddes B. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. University of Michigan Press; 2003. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/7163
35.
Ian Shapiro. Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory. 2002;30(4):596-619. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3072623?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
36.
Sartori G. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review. 1970;64(04):1033-1053. doi:10.2307/1958356
37.
John Gerring. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity. 1999;31(3):357-393. doi:10.2307/3235246
38.
Adcock R. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review. 2001;95(03):529-546. doi:10.1017/S0003055401003100
39.
Adams V. Markets of Sorrow, Labors of Faith: New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina. Duke University Press; 2005. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/418/
40.
Amoore L. Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue. 2007;38(2):215-232. doi:10.1177/0967010607078526
41.
Qualitative Methods Newsletter of the American Political Science Association. 2012;10(Issue 2 (Fall)). https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/moynihan/cqrm/qmmr/Table_of_Contents_10_2/
42.
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Research Design. In: Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:146-167.
43.
Anderson E. Policy Entrepreneurs and the Origins of the Regulatory Welfare State: Child Labor Reform in Nineteenth-Century Europe. American Sociological Review. 2018;83(1):173-211. doi:10.1177/0003122417753112
44.
Simmons ES, Smith NR. Comparison with an Ethnographic Sensibility. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2017;50(01):126-130. doi:10.1017/S1049096516002286
45.
Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203854907
46.
Brady HE, Collier D. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2010. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781442203457
47.
Brady HE, Collier D. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.
48.
Alexander L. George, Andrew Bennett. Case studies and theory development. In: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press; 2005:3-36. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5cfb1281-6c04-e911-80cd-005056af4099
49.
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright. Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis. 2006;14(3):353-368. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25791861?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
50.
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press; 1994.
51.
Goodwin J, Horowitz R. Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas of Qualitative Sociology. Qualitative Sociology. 2002;25(1):33-47. doi:10.1023/A:1014300123105
52.
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Comparative Research. In: Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:211-238.
53.
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Historical Research. In: Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:239-260.
54.
Kristin M. Bakke. Help Wanted?: The Mixed Record of Foreign Fighters in Domestic Insurgencies. International Security. 2014;38(4):150-187. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/545070
55.
Hale HE. Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics: Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics. 2011;63(04):581-617. doi:10.1017/S0043887111000189
56.
Pouliot V. Practice tracing. In: Bennett A, Checkel JT, eds. Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press; 2014:237-259. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139858472.013
57.
Collier D. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2011;44(04):823-830. doi:10.1017/S1049096511001429
58.
Acemoglu D, Johnson SH, Robinson JA. An African Success Story: Botswana. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2001. doi:10.2139/ssrn.290791
59.
Alexander L. George, Andrew Bennett. Process-Tracing and Historical Explanation. In: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press; 2005:205-232.
60.
Renwick A. "Do ‘Wrong Winner’ Elections Trigger Electoral Reform? Lessons From New Zealand. Representation. 2009;45(4):357-367. doi:10.1080/00344890903235256
61.
Snyder, Richard. Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development. 36:93-110. https://search.proquest.com/docview/220640216/abstract/4BA58C125E3B4EDEPQ/7?accountid=14511
62.
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly. 2008;61(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
63.
Bennett A, Elman C. Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science. 2006;9(1):455-476. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918
64.
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis. 2006;14(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/25791852?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
65.
Michael Burawoy. The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory. 1998;16(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/202212?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
66.
Mahoney J. Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research. 2000;28(4):387-424. doi:10.1177/0049124100028004001
67.
Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 98(4). http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-201004000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
68.
Gillian Rose. Content Analysis and Cultural Analytics: Finding Patterns in What You See. In: Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 4th edition. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016:85-105.
69.
Kristina Boréus and Göran Bergström. Content Analysis. In: Boréus K, Bergström G, eds. Analyzing Text and Discourse: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences. SAGE; 2017:23-52. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9edf456b-47d5-ec11-997e-0050f2f09783
70.
Woolley JK, Limperos AM, Oliver MB. The 2008 Presidential Election, 2.0: A Content Analysis of User-Generated Political Facebook Groups. Mass Communication and Society. 2010;13(5):631-652. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516864
71.
Brown NE, Gershon SA. Intersectional Presentations: An Exploratory Study of Minority Congresswomens’ Websites’ Biographies”. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. 2016;13(01):85-108. doi:10.1017/S1742058X15000181
72.
Schreier M. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. SAGE; 2012.
73.
Neuendorf KA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Sage Publications; 2002.
74.
Neuendorf KA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Second edition. SAGE Publications Inc; 2017.
75.
Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. SAGE; 2013.
76.
Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. Sage; 2004.
77.
Cramer KJ. A Method of Listening. In: The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press; 2016:26-44. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=95229e86-afff-e811-80cd-005056af4099
78.
Büscher B. ‘Rhino poaching is out of control!’ Violence, race and the politics of hysteria in online conservation. Environment and Planning A. 2016;48(5):979-998. doi:10.1177/0308518X16630988
79.
Dave NN. To Render Real the Imagined: An Ethnographic History of Lesbian Community in India. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 2010;35(3):595-619. doi:10.1086/648514
80.
Kozinets RV. Netnography: Redefined. 2nd edition. Sage; 2015.
81.
Pink S, Horst HA, Postill J, Hjorth L, Lewis T, Tacchi J. Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. SAGE Publications; 2016.
82.
Costello L, McDermott ML, Wallace R. Netnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2017;16(1). doi:10.1177/1609406917700647
83.
Atkinson P. Handbook of Ethnography. SAGE; 2001.
84.
H. Lidchi. The Poetics and Politics of Exhibiting Other Cultures. In: Hall S, ed. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Vol 2. Sage in association with the Open University; 1997:151-222.
85.
DeWalt KM, DeWalt BR. Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield; 2011. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780759119284
86.
Clifford J, Marcus GE, School of American Research (Santa Fe, N.M.). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. University of California Press; 1986.
87.
Schatz E. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. University of Chicago Press; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/detail.action?docID=3038320
88.
Crewe E. Ethnography of Parliament: Finding Culture and Politics Entangled in the Commons and the Lords. Parliamentary Affairs. 2017;70(1):155-172. doi:10.1093/pa/gsw012
89.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203944769
90.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1995.
91.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Routledge; 1989.
92.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Vol 249. Tavistock; 1983.
93.
Hollander JA. The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2004;33(5):602-637. doi:10.1177/0891241604266988
94.
Ortbals CD, Rincker ME. Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad: Editors’ Introduction. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2009;42(02):287-290. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/fieldwork-identities-and-intersectionality-negotiating-gender-race-class-religion-nationality-and-age-in-the-research-field-abroad-editors-introduction/E7B583F128E0B577FFC3C90B61CCC478
95.
Stephanie Taylor. Theories and common concerns. In: What Is Discourse Analysis?. Bloomsbury Academic; 2013:7-28. doi:10.5040/9781472545213.ch-002
96.
Taylor S. Four examples of discourse analysis. In: What Is Discourse Analysis?. Bloomsbury Academic; 2013:29-52. doi:10.5040/9781472545213.ch-003
97.
Debbie Lisle. Introduction: the global imaginary of contemporary travel writing. In: The Global Politics of Contemporary Travel Writing. Cambridge University Press; 2006:1-26. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491535.003
98.
Lisle D. The Global Politics of Contemporary Travel Writing. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
99.
Hall S. The Spectacle of the ‘Other’. In: Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. Sage; 2001:324-344. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2d5fc837-6b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
100.
Hansen L. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Routledge; 2006. doi:10.4324/9780203236338
101.
Stritzel H. Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue. 2012;43(6):549-567. doi:10.1177/0967010612463953
102.
Agius C. Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue. 2013;44(3):241-258. doi:10.1177/0967010613485871
103.
Milliken J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations. 1999;5(2):225-254. doi:10.1177/1354066199005002003
104.
Michael Shapiro. Textualising Global Politics. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, eds. Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. SAGE Publications; 2001:318-323.
105.
Vucetic, Srdjan. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 37(3):1295-1312. https://search.proquest.com/docview/899294200/2991417F0B324BAAPQ/17?accountid=14511
106.
Michel Foucault, Paul Rabinow. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In: The Foucault Reader. Penguin; 1991:76-100.
107.
Vrasti W. Dr Strangelove, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about Methodology and Love Writing. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2010;39(1):79-88. doi:10.1177/0305829810371017
108.
Ravecca P, Dauphinee E. Narrative and the Possibilities for Scholarship. International Political Sociology. 2018;12(2):125-138. doi:10.1093/ips/olx029
109.
Barabantseva E, Lawrence A. Encountering Vulnerabilities through ‘Filmmaking for Fieldwork’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2015;43(3):911-930. doi:10.1177/0305829815583083
110.
Penttinen E. Joy and International Relations: A New Methodology. Routledge; 2013.
111.
Suzanne Conklin Akbari, ed. How We Write:Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blank Page. Published 2015. https://punctumbooks.com/titles/how-we-write/
112.
Sandercock L, Attili G. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice. 2010;11(1):23-45. doi:10.1080/14649350903538012
