[1]
Acemoglu, D. et al. 2001. An African Success Story: Botswana. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2001). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.290791.
[2]
Adams, V. 2005. Markets of Sorrow, Labors of Faith: New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina. Duke University Press.
[3]
Adcock, R. 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review. 95, 03 (Sep. 2001), 529–546. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003100.
[4]
Agius, C. 2013. Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue. 44, 3 (Jun. 2013), 241–258. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613485871.
[5]
Alexander L. George, Andrew Bennett 2005. Case studies and theory development. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press. 3–36.
[6]
Alexander L. George, Andrew Bennett 2005. Process-Tracing and Historical Explanation. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press. 205–232.
[7]
Amoore, L. 2007. Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue. 38, 2 (Jun. 2007), 215–232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607078526.
[8]
Anderson, E. 2018. Policy Entrepreneurs and the Origins of the Regulatory Welfare State: Child Labor Reform in Nineteenth-Century Europe. American Sociological Review. 83, 1 (Feb. 2018), 173–211. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417753112.
[9]
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman 2006. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis. 14, 3 (2006).
[10]
Atkinson, P. 2001. Handbook of ethnography. SAGE.
[11]
Barabantseva, E. and Lawrence, A. 2015. Encountering Vulnerabilities through ‘Filmmaking for Fieldwork’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 43, 3 (Jun. 2015), 911–930. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815583083.
[12]
Belsey, C. 2002. Poststructuralism: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Bennett, A. and Elman, C. 2006. Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science. 9, 1 (Jun. 2006), 455–476. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918.
[14]
Billaud, Julie Visible under the Veil: Dissimulation, performance and agency in an Islamic public space. Journal of International Women’s Studies, suppl. Special Issue: Gender and Islam in Asia. 11, 120–135.
[15]
Brady, H.E. and Collier, D. 2010. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[16]
Brady, H.E. and Collier, D. 2004. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield.
[17]
Brown, N.E. and Gershon, S.A. 2016. Intersectional Presentations: An Exploratory Study of Minority Congresswomens’ Websites’ Biographies”. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. 13, 01 (2016), 85–108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X15000181.
[18]
Büscher, B. 2016. ‘Rhino poaching is out of control!’ Violence, race and the politics of hysteria in online conservation. Environment and Planning A. 48, 5 (May 2016), 979–998. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16630988.
[19]
Clifford, J. et al. 1986. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.
[20]
Coleman, S. 2012. Spaces of Disappearance. How Voters Feel. Cambridge University Press. 149–168.
[21]
Collier, D. 2011. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics. 44, 04 (Oct. 2011), 823–830. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429.
[22]
Conti, J.A. and O’Neil, M. 2007. Studying power: qualitative methods and the global elite. Qualitative Research. 7, 1 (Feb. 2007), 63–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107071421.
[23]
Costello, L. et al. 2017. Netnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 16, 1 (Dec. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917700647.
[24]
Cramer, K.J. 2016. A Method of Listening. The politics of resentment: rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press. 26–44.
[25]
Crewe, E. 2017. Ethnography of Parliament: Finding Culture and Politics Entangled in the Commons and the Lords. Parliamentary Affairs. 70, 1 (Jan. 2017), 155–172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsw012.
[26]
Dave, N.N. 2010. To Render Real the Imagined: An Ethnographic History of Lesbian Community in India. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 35, 3 (Mar. 2010), 595–619. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/648514.
[27]
Debbie Lisle 2006. Introduction: the global imaginary of contemporary travel writing. The Global Politics of Contemporary Travel Writing. Cambridge University Press. 1–26.
[28]
DeWalt, K.M. and DeWalt, B.R. 2011. Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. Rowman & Littlefield.
[29]
Fahmy, S. 2004. Picturing Afghan Women: A Content Analysis of AP Wire Photographs During the Taliban Regime and                after the Fall of the Taliban Regime. International Communication Gazette. 66, 2 (Apr. 2004), 91–112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549204041472.
[30]
Fujii, L.A. 2012. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics. 45, 04 (Oct. 2012), 717–723.
[31]
Geddes, B. 2003. Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. University of Michigan Press.
[32]
Gillian Rose 2016. Content Analysis and Cultural Analytics: Finding Patterns in What You See. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE Publications Ltd. 85–105.
[33]
Goodwin, J. and Horowitz, R. 2002. Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas of Qualitative Sociology. Qualitative Sociology. 25, 1 (2002), 33–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014300123105.
[34]
H. Lidchi 1997. The Poetics and Politics of Exhibiting Other Cultures. Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. S. Hall, ed. Sage in association with the Open University. 151–222.
[35]
Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what?. Harvard University Press.
[36]
Hale, H.E. 2011. Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics: Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics. 63, 04 (Oct. 2011), 581–617. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887111000189.
[37]
Hall, S. 2001. The Spectacle of the ‘Other’. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage. 324–344.
[38]
Hammersley, M. 2014. On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research. 14, 5 (Oct. 2014), 529–541. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113495039.
[39]
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. 2007. Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge.
[40]
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. 1995. Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge.
[41]
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. 1989. Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge.
[42]
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. 1983. Ethnography: principles in practice. Tavistock.
[43]
Hansen, L. 2006. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Routledge.
[44]
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright 2006. Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis. 14, 3 (2006), 353–368.
[45]
Hollander, J.A. 2004. The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 33, 5 (Oct. 2004), 602–637. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241604266988.
[46]
Hope Alkon, A. 2011. Reflexivity and Environmental Justice Scholarship: A Role for Feminist Methodologies. Organization & Environment. 24, 2 (Jun. 2011), 130–149. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1096026611414347.
[47]
How people feel about what companies do with their data is just as important as what they know about it: LSE Impact Blog: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/03/29/how-people-feel-about-what-companies-do-with-their-data-is-just-as-important-as-what-they-know-about-it/.
[48]
How We Write:Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blank Page: 2015. https://punctumbooks.com/titles/how-we-write/.
[49]
Hutchison, E. 2014. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology. 8, 1 (Mar. 2014), 1–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12037.
[50]
Ian Shapiro 2002. Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory. 30, 4 (2002), 596–619.
[51]
Jackson, P.T. 2010. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge.
[52]
Jackson, P.T. 2016. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge.
[53]
Jason Seawright and John Gerring 2008. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly. 61, 2 (2008).
[54]
John Gerring 1999. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity. 31, 3 (Mar. 1999), 357–393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3235246.
[55]
King, G. et al. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
[56]
King, G. et al. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
[57]
Kozinets, R.V. 2015. Netnography: redefined. Sage.
[58]
Kratochwil, F. 2008. Constructivism: what it is (not) and how it matters. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. D. Della Porta and M. Keating, eds. Cambridge University Press. 80–98.
[59]
Krippendorff, K. 2013. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. SAGE.
[60]
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage.
[61]
Kristin M. Bakke 2014. Help Wanted?: The Mixed Record of Foreign Fighters in Domestic Insurgencies. International Security. 38, 4 (2014), 150–187.
[62]
Kristina Boréus and Göran Bergström 2017. Content Analysis. Analyzing text and discourse: eight approaches for the social sciences. K. Boréus and G. Bergström, eds. SAGE. 23–52.
[63]
Laitin, D.D. 2003. The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society. 31, 1 (Mar. 2003), 163–184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329202250167.
[64]
Lene Hansen Ontologies, epistemologies, methodologies. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. L. Shepherd, ed. Routledge. 42–51.
[65]
Lisle, D. 2012. The global politics of contemporary travel writing. Cambridge University Press.
[66]
Lundy, P. and McGovern, M. 2006. The ethics of silence. Action Research. 4, 1 (Mar. 2006), 49–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306060542.
[67]
Mahoney, J. 2000. Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research. 28, 4 (May 2000), 387–424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124100028004001.
[68]
Michael Burawoy 1998. The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory. 16, 1 (1998).
[69]
Michael Shapiro 2001. Textualising Global Politics. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. M. Wetherell et al., eds. SAGE Publications. 318–323.
[70]
Michel Foucault 1991. Truth and Power. The Foucault reader. Penguin. 51–75.
[71]
Michel Foucault, Paul Rabinow 1991. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. The Foucault reader. Penguin. 76–100.
[72]
Milliken, J. 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations. 5, 2 (Jun. 1999), 225–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.
[73]
Neuendorf, K.A. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications.
[74]
Neuendorf, K.A. 2017. The content analysis guidebook. SAGE Publications Inc.
[75]
Ortbals, C.D. and Rincker, M.E. 2009. Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad: Editors’ Introduction. PS: Political Science & Politics. 42, 02 (Apr. 2009), 287–290.
[76]
Penttinen, E. 2013. Joy and international relations: a new methodology. Routledge.
[77]
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea 2013. Design in Context: From the Human Side of Research to Writing Research Manuscripts. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. Routledge. 129–143.
[78]
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea 2012. Designing for Trustworthiness: Knowledge Claims and Evaluations of Interpretive Research. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. Routledge. 105–128.
[79]
Pink, S. et al. 2016. Digital ethnography: principles and practice. SAGE Publications.
[80]
Pouliot, V. 2014. Practice tracing. Process Tracing. A. Bennett and J.T. Checkel, eds. Cambridge University Press. 237–259.
[81]
Ravecca, P. and Dauphinee, E. 2018. Narrative and the Possibilities for Scholarship. International Political Sociology. 12, 2 (Jun. 2018), 125–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olx029.
[82]
Renwick, A. 2009. "Do ‘Wrong Winner’ Elections Trigger Electoral Reform? Lessons From New Zealand. Representation. 45, 4 (Nov. 2009), 357–367. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890903235256.
[83]
Rose, G. 2023. Understanding Visual Research Ethics. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE Publications Ltd. 94–110.
[84]
Rose Wiles 2013. Thinking ethically: approaches to research ethics. What are qualitative research ethics?. Bloomsbury. 9–24.
[85]
Sabaratnam, M. 2011. IR in Dialogue … but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 39, 3 (May 2011), 781–803. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811404270.
[86]
Sandercock, L. and Attili, G. 2010. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice. 11, 1 (Mar. 2010), 23–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903538012.
[87]
Sandercock, L. and Attili, G. 2010. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice. 11, 1 (Mar. 2010), 23–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903538012.
[88]
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath 2017. Comparative Research. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 211–238.
[89]
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath 2017. Historical Research. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 239–260.
[90]
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath 2017. Objectivity and Values. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 54–78.
[91]
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath 2017. Research Design. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 146–167.
[92]
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath 2017. What is data? Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 168–187.
[93]
Sarah Riley, et al 2012. Coming Up with a Research Question. Doing your qualitative psychology project. Sarah Riley et al., eds. SAGE Publications. 23–26.
[94]
Sartori, G. 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review. 64, 04 (Dec. 1970), 1033–1053. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356.
[95]
Schatz, E. 2009. Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. University of Chicago Press.
[96]
Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE.
[97]
Schwartz-Shea, P. and Yanow, D. 2012. Interpretive research design: concepts and processes. Routledge.
[98]
Shepherd, L.J. 2006. Veiled references: Constructions of gender in the Bush administration discourse on the attacks on Afghanistan post-9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 8, 1 (Mar. 2006), 19–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740500415425.
[99]
Simmons, E.S. and Smith, N.R. 2017. Comparison with an Ethnographic Sensibility. PS: Political Science & Politics. 50, 01 (Jan. 2017), 126–130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002286.
[100]
Smith, R.M. 2002. Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? Political Science & Politics. 35, 02 (Jun. 2002), 199–201.
[101]
Snyder, Richard Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development. 36, 93–110.
[102]
Stephanie Taylor 2013. Theories and common concerns. What is Discourse Analysis?. Bloomsbury Academic. 7–28.
[103]
Stritzel, H. 2012. Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue. 43, 6 (Dec. 2012), 549–567. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612463953.
[104]
Taylor, S. 2013. Four examples of discourse analysis. What is Discourse Analysis?. Bloomsbury Academic. 29–52.
[105]
Tom Clark 2008. ‘We’re Over-Researched Here!’ Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within Qualitative Research Engagements. Sociology. 42, 5 (2008), 953–970.
[106]
Vrasti, W. 2010. Dr Strangelove, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about Methodology and Love Writing. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 39, 1 (Aug. 2010), 79–88. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810371017.
[107]
Vucetic, Srdjan Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 37, 3, 1295–1312.
[108]
Woolley, J.K. et al. 2010. The 2008 Presidential Election, 2.0: A Content Analysis of User-Generated Political Facebook Groups. Mass Communication and Society. 13, 5 (Oct. 2010), 631–652. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.516864.
[109]
Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
[110]
Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
[111]
2012. Qualitative Methods Newsletter of the American Political Science Association. 10, Issue 2 (Fall) (2012).
[112]
Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 98, 4.