1
Fahmy S. Picturing Afghan Women: A Content Analysis of AP Wire Photographs During the Taliban Regime and after the Fall of the Taliban Regime. International Communication Gazette. 2004;66:91–112. doi: 10.1177/0016549204041472
2
Billaud, Julie. Visible under the Veil: Dissimulation, performance and agency in an Islamic public space. Journal of International Women’s Studies, suppl Special Issue: Gender and Islam in Asia. ;11:120–35.
3
Shepherd LJ. Veiled references: Constructions of gender in the Bush administration discourse on the attacks on Afghanistan post-9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2006;8:19–41. doi: 10.1080/14616740500415425
4
Sarah Riley, et al. Coming Up with a Research Question. In: Sarah Riley, Cath Sullivan, Stephen Gibson, eds. Doing your qualitative psychology project. London, [England]: SAGE Publications 2012:23–6.
5
Lene Hansen. Ontologies, epistemologies, methodologies. In: Shepherd L, ed. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. London: Routledge :42–51.
6
Sabaratnam M. IR in Dialogue … but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011;39:781–803. doi: 10.1177/0305829811404270
7
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Objectivity and Values. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017:54–78.
8
Schwartz-Shea P, Yanow D. Interpretive Research Design. Routledge 2012.
9
Jackson PT. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. by New York: Routledge 2010.
10
Jackson PT. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Second edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2016.
11
Belsey C. Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University PressOxford 2022.
12
Michel Foucault. Truth and Power. The Foucault reader. London: Penguin 1991:51–75.
13
Hacking I. The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1999.
14
Kratochwil F. Constructivism: what it is (not) and how it matters. In: Della Porta D, Keating M, eds. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008:80–98.
15
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1994.
16
Smith RM. Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? Political Science & Politics. 2002;35:199–201.
17
Laitin DD. The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society. 2003;31:163–84. doi: 10.1177/0032329202250167
18
Rose Wiles. Thinking ethically: approaches to research ethics. What are qualitative research ethics?. London: Bloomsbury 2013:9–24.
19
Rose G. Understanding Visual Research Ethics. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. London: SAGE Publications Ltd 2023:94–110.
20
How people feel about what companies do with their data is just as important as what they know about it: LSE Impact Blog. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/03/29/how-people-feel-about-what-companies-do-with-their-data-is-just-as-important-as-what-they-know-about-it/
21
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. Designing for Trustworthiness: Knowledge Claims and Evaluations of Interpretive Research. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge 2012:105–28.
22
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. Design in Context: From the Human Side of Research to Writing Research Manuscripts. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge 2012:129–43.
23
Hope Alkon A. Reflexivity and Environmental Justice Scholarship: A Role for Feminist Methodologies. Organization & Environment. 2011;24:130–49. doi: 10.1177/1096026611414347
24
Schwartz-Shea P, Yanow D. Interpretive research design: concepts and processes. New York: Routledge 2012.
25
Sandercock L, Attili G. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice. 2010;11:23–45. doi: 10.1080/14649350903538012
26
Conti JA, O’Neil M. Studying power: qualitative methods and the global elite. Qualitative Research. 2007;7:63–82. doi: 10.1177/1468794107071421
27
Tom Clark. ‘We’re Over-Researched Here!’ Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within Qualitative Research Engagements. Sociology. 2008;42:953–70.
28
Hammersley M. On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research. 2014;14:529–41. doi: 10.1177/1468794113495039
29
Fujii LA. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2012;45:717–23.
30
Lundy P, McGovern M. The ethics of silence. Action Research. 2006;4:49–64. doi: 10.1177/1476750306060542
31
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. What is data? Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017:168–87.
32
Coleman S. Spaces of Disappearance. How Voters Feel. New York: Cambridge University Press 2012:149–68.
33
Hutchison E. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology. 2014;8:1–19. doi: 10.1111/ips.12037
34
Geddes B. Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2003.
35
Ian Shapiro. Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory. 2002;30:596–619.
36
Sartori G. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review. 1970;64:1033–53. doi: 10.2307/1958356
37
John Gerring. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity. 1999;31:357–93. doi: 10.2307/3235246
38
Adcock R. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review. 2001;95:529–46. doi: 10.1017/S0003055401003100
39
Adams V. Markets of Sorrow, Labors of Faith: New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina. Durham, N.C. ; London: Duke University Press 2005.
40
Amoore L. Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue. 2007;38:215–32. doi: 10.1177/0967010607078526
41
Qualitative Methods Newsletter of the American Political Science Association. 2012;10.
42
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Research Design. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017:146–67.
43
Anderson E. Policy Entrepreneurs and the Origins of the Regulatory Welfare State: Child Labor Reform in Nineteenth-Century Europe. American Sociological Review. 2018;83:173–211. doi: 10.1177/0003122417753112
44
Simmons ES, Smith NR. Comparison with an Ethnographic Sensibility. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2017;50:126–30. doi: 10.1017/S1049096516002286
45
Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
46
Brady HE, Collier D. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2010.
47
Brady HE, Collier D. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield 2004.
48
Alexander L. George, Andrew Bennett. Case studies and theory development. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2005:3–36.
49
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright. Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis. 2006;14:353–68.
50
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1994.
51
Goodwin J, Horowitz R. Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas of Qualitative Sociology. Qualitative Sociology. 2002;25:33–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1014300123105
52
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Comparative Research. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017:211–38.
53
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Historical Research. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017:239–60.
54
Kristin M. Bakke. Help Wanted?: The Mixed Record of Foreign Fighters in Domestic Insurgencies. International Security. 2014;38:150–87.
55
Hale HE. Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics: Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics. 2011;63:581–617. doi: 10.1017/S0043887111000189
56
Pouliot V. Practice tracing. In: Bennett A, Checkel JT, eds. Process Tracing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014:237–59.
57
Collier D. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2011;44:823–30. doi: 10.1017/S1049096511001429
58
Acemoglu D, Johnson SH, Robinson JA. An African Success Story: Botswana. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published Online First: 2001. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.290791
59
Alexander L. George, Andrew Bennett. Process-Tracing and Historical Explanation. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2005:205–32.
60
Renwick A. "Do ‘Wrong Winner’ Elections Trigger Electoral Reform? Lessons From New Zealand. Representation. 2009;45:357–67. doi: 10.1080/00344890903235256
61
Snyder, Richard. Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development. ;36:93–110.
62
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly. 2008;61.
63
Bennett A, Elman C. Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science. 2006;9:455–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918
64
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis. 2006;14.
65
Michael Burawoy. The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory. 1998;16.
66
Mahoney J. Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research. 2000;28:387–424. doi: 10.1177/0049124100028004001
67
Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ;98.
68
Gillian Rose. Content Analysis and Cultural Analytics: Finding Patterns in What You See. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. London: SAGE Publications Ltd 2016:85–105.
69
Kristina Boréus and Göran Bergström. Content Analysis. In: Boréus K, Bergström G, eds. Analyzing text and discourse: eight approaches for the social sciences. Los Angeles: SAGE 2017:23–52.
70
Woolley JK, Limperos AM, Oliver MB. The 2008 Presidential Election, 2.0: A Content Analysis of User-Generated Political Facebook Groups. Mass Communication and Society. 2010;13:631–52. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.516864
71
Brown NE, Gershon SA. Intersectional Presentations: An Exploratory Study of Minority Congresswomens’ Websites’ Biographies”. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. 2016;13:85–108. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X15000181
72
Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: SAGE 2012.
73
Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications 2002.
74
Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc 2017.
75
Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE 2013.
76
Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage 2004.
77
Cramer KJ. A Method of Listening. The politics of resentment: rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2016:26–44.
78
Büscher B. ‘Rhino poaching is out of control!’ Violence, race and the politics of hysteria in online conservation. Environment and Planning A. 2016;48:979–98. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16630988
79
Dave NN. To Render Real the Imagined: An Ethnographic History of Lesbian Community in India. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 2010;35:595–619. doi: 10.1086/648514
80
Kozinets RV. Netnography: redefined. 2nd edition. Los Angeles: Sage 2015.
81
Pink S, Horst HA, Postill J, et al. Digital ethnography: principles and practice. London: SAGE Publications 2016.
82
Costello L, McDermott M-L, Wallace R. Netnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2017;16. doi: 10.1177/1609406917700647
83
Atkinson P. Handbook of ethnography. London: SAGE 2001.
84
H. Lidchi. The Poetics and Politics of Exhibiting Other Cultures. In: Hall S, ed. Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage in association with the Open University 1997:151–222.
85
DeWalt KM, DeWalt BR. Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield 2011.
86
Clifford J, Marcus GE, School of American Research (Santa Fe, N.M.). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press 1986.
87
Schatz E. Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2009.
88
Crewe E. Ethnography of Parliament: Finding Culture and Politics Entangled in the Commons and the Lords. Parliamentary Affairs. 2017;70:155–72. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsw012
89
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge 2007.
90
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge 1995.
91
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. London: Routledge 1989.
92
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. London: Tavistock 1983.
93
Hollander JA. The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2004;33:602–37. doi: 10.1177/0891241604266988
94
Ortbals CD, Rincker ME. Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad: Editors’ Introduction. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2009;42:287–90.
95
Stephanie Taylor. Theories and common concerns. What is Discourse Analysis?. Bloomsbury Academic 2013:7–28.
96
Taylor S. Four examples of discourse analysis. What is Discourse Analysis?. Bloomsbury Academic 2013:29–52.
97
Debbie Lisle. Introduction: the global imaginary of contemporary travel writing. The Global Politics of Contemporary Travel Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006:1–26.
98
Lisle D. The global politics of contemporary travel writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
99
Hall S. The Spectacle of the ‘Other’. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage 2001:324–44.
100
Hansen L. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: Routledge 2006.
101
Stritzel H. Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue. 2012;43:549–67. doi: 10.1177/0967010612463953
102
Agius C. Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue. 2013;44:241–58. doi: 10.1177/0967010613485871
103
Milliken J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations. 1999;5:225–54. doi: 10.1177/1354066199005002003
104
Michael Shapiro. Textualising Global Politics. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, eds. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: SAGE Publications 2001:318–23.
105
Vucetic, Srdjan. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. ;37:1295–312.
106
Michel Foucault, Paul Rabinow. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. The Foucault reader. London: Penguin 1991:76–100.
107
Vrasti W. Dr Strangelove, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about Methodology and Love Writing. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2010;39:79–88. doi: 10.1177/0305829810371017
108
Ravecca P, Dauphinee E. Narrative and the Possibilities for Scholarship. International Political Sociology. 2018;12:125–38. doi: 10.1093/ips/olx029
109
Barabantseva E, Lawrence A. Encountering Vulnerabilities through ‘Filmmaking for Fieldwork’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2015;43:911–30. doi: 10.1177/0305829815583083
110
Penttinen E. Joy and international relations: a new methodology. London: Routledge 2013.
111
Suzanne Conklin Akbari, editor. How We Write:Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blank Page. 2015. https://punctumbooks.com/titles/how-we-write/
112
Sandercock L, Attili G. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice. 2010;11:23–45. doi: 10.1080/14649350903538012
