1
Fahmy S. Picturing Afghan Women: A Content Analysis of AP Wire Photographs During the Taliban Regime and                after the Fall of the Taliban Regime. International Communication Gazette 2004;66:91–112. doi:10.1177/0016549204041472
2
Billaud, Julie. Visible under the Veil: Dissimulation, performance and agency in an Islamic public space. Journal of International Women’s Studies, suppl Special Issue: Gender and Islam in Asia;11:120–35.https://search.proquest.com/docview/232179263?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
3
Shepherd LJ. Veiled references: Constructions of gender in the Bush administration discourse on the attacks on Afghanistan post-9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics 2006;8:19–41. doi:10.1080/14616740500415425
4
Sarah Riley, et al. Coming Up with a Research Question. In: Sarah Riley, Cath Sullivan, Stephen Gibson, eds. Doing your qualitative psychology project. London, [England]: : SAGE Publications 2012. 23–6.http://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-your-qualitative-psychology-project
5
Lene Hansen. Ontologies, epistemologies, methodologies. In: Shepherd L, ed. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. London: : Routledge 42–51. doi:10.4324/9781315879819
6
Sabaratnam M. IR in Dialogue … but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2011;39:781–803. doi:10.1177/0305829811404270
7
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Objectivity and Values. In: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017. 54–78.
8
Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203854907
9
Jackson PT. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. by New York: : Routledge 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203843321
10
Jackson PT. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Second edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2016.
11
Belsey C. Poststructuralism: a very short introduction. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2002.
12
Michel Foucault. Truth and Power. In: The Foucault reader. London: : Penguin 1991. 51–75.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8cd663f8-de02-e911-80cd-005056af4099
13
Hacking I. The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.
14
Kratochwil F. Constructivism: what it is (not) and how it matters. In: Della Porta D, Keating M, eds. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. 80–98. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801938.006
15
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1994.
16
Smith RM. Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? Political Science & Politics 2002;35:199–201.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/should-we-make-political-science-more-of-a-science-or-more-about-politics/6B149CA2D34B349B68753E0953534FEC
17
Laitin DD. The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society 2003;31:163–84. doi:10.1177/0032329202250167
18
Rose Wiles. Thinking ethically: approaches to research ethics. In: What are qualitative research ethics? London: : Bloomsbury 2013. 9–24. doi:10.5040/9781849666558.ch-002
19
Rose G. Understanding Visual Research Ethics. In: Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2023. 94–110.https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2038408
20
How people feel about what companies do with their data is just as important as what they know about it: LSE Impact Blog. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/03/29/how-people-feel-about-what-companies-do-with-their-data-is-just-as-important-as-what-they-know-about-it/
21
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. Designing for Trustworthiness: Knowledge Claims and Evaluations of Interpretive Research. In: Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: : Routledge 2012. 105–28. doi:10.4324/9780203854907
22
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. Design in Context: From the Human Side of Research to Writing Research Manuscripts. In: Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: : Routledge 2013. 129–43. doi:10.4324/9780203854907
23
Hope Alkon A. Reflexivity and Environmental Justice Scholarship: A Role for Feminist Methodologies. Organization & Environment 2011;24:130–49. doi:10.1177/1096026611414347
24
Schwartz-Shea P, Yanow D. Interpretive research design: concepts and processes. New York: : Routledge 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203854907
25
Sandercock L, Attili G. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice 2010;11:23–45. doi:10.1080/14649350903538012
26
Conti JA, O’Neil M. Studying power: qualitative methods and the global elite. Qualitative Research 2007;7:63–82. doi:10.1177/1468794107071421
27
Tom Clark. ‘We’re Over-Researched Here!’ Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within Qualitative Research Engagements. Sociology 2008;42:953–70.https://www.jstor.org/stable/42857198?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
28
Hammersley M. On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research 2014;14:529–41. doi:10.1177/1468794113495039
29
Fujii LA. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics 2012;45:717–23.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/research-ethics-101-dilemmas-and-responsibilities/90D5442392CD0716F04E764939054FF7
30
Lundy P, McGovern M. The ethics of silence. Action Research 2006;4:49–64. doi:10.1177/1476750306060542
31
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. What is data? In: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017. 168–87.
32
Coleman S. Spaces of Disappearance. In: How Voters Feel. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2012. 149–68. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139035354.007
33
Hutchison E. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology 2014;8:1–19. doi:10.1111/ips.12037
34
Geddes B. Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2003. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/7163
35
Ian Shapiro. Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory 2002;30:596–619.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3072623?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
36
Sartori G. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 1970;64:1033–53. doi:10.2307/1958356
37
John Gerring. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity 1999;31:357–93. doi:10.2307/3235246
38
Adcock R. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review 2001;95:529–46. doi:10.1017/S0003055401003100
39
Adams V. Markets of Sorrow, Labors of Faith: New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina. Durham, N.C. ; London: : Duke University Press 2005. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/418/
40
Amoore L. Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue 2007;38:215–32. doi:10.1177/0967010607078526
41
Qualitative Methods Newsletter of the American Political Science Association. 2012;10.https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/moynihan/cqrm/qmmr/Table_of_Contents_10_2/
42
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Research Design. In: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017. 146–67.
43
Anderson E. Policy Entrepreneurs and the Origins of the Regulatory Welfare State: Child Labor Reform in Nineteenth-Century Europe. American Sociological Review 2018;83:173–211. doi:10.1177/0003122417753112
44
Simmons ES, Smith NR. Comparison with an Ethnographic Sensibility. PS: Political Science & Politics 2017;50:126–30. doi:10.1017/S1049096516002286
45
Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203854907
46
Brady HE, Collier D. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. 2nd ed. Lanham: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2010. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781442203457
47
Brady HE, Collier D. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2004.
48
Alexander L. George, Andrew Bennett. Case studies and theory development. In: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2005. 3–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5cfb1281-6c04-e911-80cd-005056af4099
49
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright. Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis 2006;14:353–68.https://www.jstor.org/stable/25791861?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
50
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1994.
51
Goodwin J, Horowitz R. Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas of Qualitative Sociology. Qualitative Sociology 2002;25:33–47. doi:10.1023/A:1014300123105
52
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Comparative Research. In: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017. 211–38.
53
Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Historical Research. In: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017. 239–60.
54
Kristin M. Bakke. Help Wanted?: The Mixed Record of Foreign Fighters in Domestic Insurgencies. International Security 2014;38:150–87.https://muse.jhu.edu/article/545070
55
Hale HE. Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics: Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics 2011;63:581–617. doi:10.1017/S0043887111000189
56
Pouliot V. Practice tracing. In: Bennett A, Checkel JT, eds. Process Tracing. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2014. 237–59. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139858472.013
57
Collier D. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics 2011;44:823–30. doi:10.1017/S1049096511001429
58
Acemoglu D, Johnson SH, Robinson JA. An African Success Story: Botswana. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2001. doi:10.2139/ssrn.290791
59
Alexander L. George, Andrew Bennett. Process-Tracing and Historical Explanation. In: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2005. 205–32.
60
Renwick A. "Do ‘Wrong Winner’ Elections Trigger Electoral Reform? Lessons From New Zealand. Representation 2009;45:357–67. doi:10.1080/00344890903235256
61
Snyder, Richard. Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development;36:93–110.https://search.proquest.com/docview/220640216/abstract/4BA58C125E3B4EDEPQ/7?accountid=14511
62
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 2008;61.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
63
Bennett A, Elman C. Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science 2006;9:455–76. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918
64
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis 2006;14.https://www.jstor.org/stable/25791852?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
65
Michael Burawoy. The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory 1998;16.https://www.jstor.org/stable/202212?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
66
Mahoney J. Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research 2000;28:387–424. doi:10.1177/0049124100028004001
67
Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology;98.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-201004000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
68
Gillian Rose. Content Analysis and Cultural Analytics: Finding Patterns in What You See. In: Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2016. 85–105.
69
Kristina Boréus and Göran Bergström. Content Analysis. In: Boréus K, Bergström G, eds. Analyzing text and discourse: eight approaches for the social sciences. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2017. 23–52.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9edf456b-47d5-ec11-997e-0050f2f09783
70
Woolley JK, Limperos AM, Oliver MB. The 2008 Presidential Election, 2.0: A Content Analysis of User-Generated Political Facebook Groups. Mass Communication and Society 2010;13:631–52. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516864
71
Brown NE, Gershon SA. Intersectional Presentations: An Exploratory Study of Minority Congresswomens’ Websites’ Biographies”. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 2016;13:85–108. doi:10.1017/S1742058X15000181
72
Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2012.
73
Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage Publications 2002.
74
Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, California: : SAGE Publications Inc 2017.
75
Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2013.
76
Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage 2004.
77
Cramer KJ. A Method of Listening. In: The politics of resentment: rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2016. 26–44.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=95229e86-afff-e811-80cd-005056af4099
78
Büscher B. ‘Rhino poaching is out of control!’ Violence, race and the politics of hysteria in online conservation. Environment and Planning A 2016;48:979–98. doi:10.1177/0308518X16630988
79
Dave NN. To Render Real the Imagined: An Ethnographic History of Lesbian Community in India. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 2010;35:595–619. doi:10.1086/648514
80
Kozinets RV. Netnography: redefined. 2nd edition. Los Angeles: : Sage 2015.
81
Pink S, Horst HA, Postill J, et al. Digital ethnography: principles and practice. London: : SAGE Publications 2016.
82
Costello L, McDermott M-L, Wallace R. Netnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2017;16. doi:10.1177/1609406917700647
83
Atkinson P. Handbook of ethnography. London: : SAGE 2001.
84
H. Lidchi. The Poetics and Politics of Exhibiting Other Cultures. In: Hall S, ed. Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. London: : Sage in association with the Open University 1997. 151–222.
85
DeWalt KM, DeWalt BR. Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2011. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780759119284
86
Clifford J, Marcus GE, School of American Research (Santa Fe, N.M.). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 1986.
87
Schatz E. Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/detail.action?docID=3038320
88
Crewe E. Ethnography of Parliament: Finding Culture and Politics Entangled in the Commons and the Lords. Parliamentary Affairs 2017;70:155–72. doi:10.1093/pa/gsw012
89
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. 3rd ed. London: : Routledge 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203944769
90
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. 2nd ed. London: : Routledge 1995.
91
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. London: : Routledge 1989.
92
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. London: : Tavistock 1983.
93
Hollander JA. The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2004;33:602–37. doi:10.1177/0891241604266988
94
Ortbals CD, Rincker ME. Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad: Editors’ Introduction. PS: Political Science & Politics 2009;42:287–90.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/fieldwork-identities-and-intersectionality-negotiating-gender-race-class-religion-nationality-and-age-in-the-research-field-abroad-editors-introduction/E7B583F128E0B577FFC3C90B61CCC478
95
Stephanie Taylor. Theories and common concerns. In: What is Discourse Analysis? Bloomsbury Academic 2013. 7–28. doi:10.5040/9781472545213.ch-002
96
Taylor S. Four examples of discourse analysis. In: What is Discourse Analysis? Bloomsbury Academic 2013. 29–52. doi:10.5040/9781472545213.ch-003
97
Debbie Lisle. Introduction: the global imaginary of contemporary travel writing. In: The Global Politics of Contemporary Travel Writing. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. 1–26. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491535.003
98
Lisle D. The global politics of contemporary travel writing. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
99
Hall S. The Spectacle of the ‘Other’. In: Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: : Sage 2001. 324–44.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2d5fc837-6b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
100
Hansen L. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: : Routledge 2006. doi:10.4324/9780203236338
101
Stritzel H. Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue 2012;43:549–67. doi:10.1177/0967010612463953
102
Agius C. Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue 2013;44:241–58. doi:10.1177/0967010613485871
103
Milliken J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations 1999;5:225–54. doi:10.1177/1354066199005002003
104
Michael Shapiro. Textualising Global Politics. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, eds. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: : SAGE Publications 2001. 318–23.
105
Vucetic, Srdjan. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies;37:1295–312.https://search.proquest.com/docview/899294200/2991417F0B324BAAPQ/17?accountid=14511
106
Michel Foucault, Paul Rabinow. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In: The Foucault reader. London: : Penguin 1991. 76–100.
107
Vrasti W. Dr Strangelove, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about Methodology and Love Writing. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2010;39:79–88. doi:10.1177/0305829810371017
108
Ravecca P, Dauphinee E. Narrative and the Possibilities for Scholarship. International Political Sociology 2018;12:125–38. doi:10.1093/ips/olx029
109
Barabantseva E, Lawrence A. Encountering Vulnerabilities through ‘Filmmaking for Fieldwork’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2015;43:911–30. doi:10.1177/0305829815583083
110
Penttinen E. Joy and international relations: a new methodology. London: : Routledge 2013.
111
Suzanne Conklin Akbari, editor. How We Write:Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blank Page. 2015.https://punctumbooks.com/titles/how-we-write/
112
Sandercock L, Attili G. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice 2010;11:23–45. doi:10.1080/14649350903538012