1
David Nicholas, Kramer Carol. Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.
2
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009.
3
Binford LR. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research. 1981;37:195–208.
4
Clarke D. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47:6–18. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X0003461X
5
Flannery KV. Research strategy and formative Mesoamerica; a prayer for an endangered species. The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009.
6
Schiffer MB. Archaeological context and systemic context. American antiquity. 1972;37:156–65.
7
Binford LB. A consideration of archaeological research design. American antiquity. 1964;29:425–41.
8
Flannery KV. The golden marshalltown. American Anthropologist, New Series. 1982;84:265–78.
9
Trigger BG. Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology. Antiquity. 1970;44:26–37. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00040953
10
Schiffer MB. Formation processes. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press 1987:143-150-199–217.
11
Wood W, Johnson D. A survey of disturbance processes in archaeological site formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1978;1.
12
Binford LR. Dimensional analysis of behaviour and site structure: learning from Eskimo hunting stand. American Antiquity. 1978;43:330–61.
13
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2:117–63. doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
14
Andrefsky W. Raw material availability and organization of technology. American Antiquity. 1994;59:21–34.
15
Binford LR. Forty-seven trips: A case study in the character of archaeological formation process. Working at archaeology. London: Academic Press 1983:243–68.
16
Binford LR. Organization and formation processes: looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research. 1979;35:255–73.
17
Hardy-Smith T, Edwards PC. The garbage crisis in prehistory: artefact discard patterns at the Early Natufian site of Wadi Hammeh 27 and the origins of household refuse disposal strategies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2004;23:253–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2004.05.001
18
Flannery KV, Winter M. Analyzing household activities. The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009:34–47.
19
LaMotta VM, Schiffer MB. Formation processes of house floor assemblages. The archaeology of household activities. London: Routledge 1999:19–29.
20
de Loecker et al. D. A re-fitter’s paradise. Lithic analysis at the Millennium. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2003:113–36.
21
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2:117–63. doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
22
Hill JD. Introduction. Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum 1995:1–11.
23
Kent S. The archaeological visibility of storage: delineating storage from trash areas. American Antiquity. 1999;64:79–94.
24
Pigeot N. Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian etiolles. Archaeological review from Cambridge. 1990;9:126–41.
25
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009.
26
David N, Kramer C. Architecture: chapter 10. Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001:284–302.
27
Parker Pearson M, Richards C. Ordering the world: perceptions of architecture, space and time. Architecture and order: approaches to social space. London: Routledge 1994:1–36.
28
Wilk RR, Rathje WL. Household Archaeology. American Behavioral Scientist. 1982;25:617–39. doi: 10.1177/000276482025006003
29
Smith ME. Household possessions and wealth in agrarian states: Implications for archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1987;6:297–335. doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(87)90004-3
30
Steadman, Sharon R. Recent Research in the Archaeology of Architecture: Beyond the Foundations. Journal of Archaeological Research. ;4:51–93.
31
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009.
32
Fairclough G. Meaningful constructions – spatial and functional analysis of medieval buildings. Antiquity. 1992;66:348–66. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00081461
33
Foster SM. Analysis of spatial patterns in buildings (access analysis) as an insight into social structure: examples from the Scottish Atlantic Iron Age. Antiquity. 1989;63:40–50. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00075566
34
Grahame M. Public and private in the Roman house. Domestic space in the Roman world: Pompeii and beyond. Portsmouth, RI: JRA 1997:137–64.
35
Hill J. Broken K pueblo. New perspectives in archeology. Chicago: Aldine 1968:103–42.
36
Kramer C. An archaeological view of a contemporary Kurdish village: domestic architecture, household size and wealth . Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. Guildford: Columbia University Press 1979:139–63.
37
Wright K. The social origins of cooking and dining in early villages of western Asia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 2000;66.
38
The archaeology of the dead : lectures in archaeothanatology - University College London.
39
Michael Parker Perason. Form now to then: ethnoarchaeology and analogy. The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: Sutton 1999.
40
Lee, Frances, Roberts, Charlotte A., Bintliff, J. L. Burial archaeology: current research methods and developments. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports 1989.
41
Scarre C. The meaning of death: funerary beliefs and the prehistorian. The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994:75–82.
42
Tainter, Joseph A. Mortuary Practices and the Study of Prehistoric Social Systems. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. ;1:105–41.
43
Ucko PJ. Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains. World Archaeology. 1969;1:262–80. doi: 10.1080/00438243.1969.9979444
44
Whitley J. Too many ancestors. Antiquity. 2002;76:119–26. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00089870
45
MacDonald DH. Grief and Burial in the American Southwest: The Role of Evolutionary Theory in the Interpretation of Mortuary Remains. American Antiquity. 2001;66:704–14. doi: 10.2307/2694183
46
Parker Pearson M. Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnographical study. Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982:99–113.
47
Rega E. Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. London: Leicester University Press 1996:229–47.
48
Reynolds, Andrew. Anglo-Saxon deviant burial customs. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
49
Shennan S. The social organization at Branč. Antiquity. 1975;49:279–88. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00070319
50
Aufderheide, Arthur C., Rodríguez-Martín, Conrado, Langsjoen, Odin. The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1997.
51
Brothwell, Don R., British Museum (Natural History). Digging up bones: the excavation, treatment and study of human skeletal remains. 3rd ed. London: British Museum (Natural History) 1981.
52
Aftandilian, David, Ubelaker, Douglas H., Haas, Jonathan, et al. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains: proceedings of a seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History, organized by Jonathan Haas. Fayetteville, Ark: Arkansas Archeological Survey 1994.
53
Hillson, Simon. Dental anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
54
White, T. D., Folkens, Pieter A., Black, Michael Timothy. Human osteology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic 2012.
55
Cherry J. Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state. Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1987:146–72.
56
David, Nicholas, Kramer, Carol. Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.
57
Binford LR. Willow smoke and dog’s tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity. 1980;45:4–20.
58
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009.
59
Pires-Ferreira J. Shell and iron-ore mirror exchange in Formative Mesoamerica. The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009:311–28.
60
Roth A, editor. Social change in the Fourth Dynasty (Egypt): the spatial organization of pyramids, tombs and cemeteries. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt. 1993;30.
61
Winter M. Distribution of obsidian among households in two Oaxacan villages. The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009:306–11.
62
Juggins S, Cameron N. Diatoms and archaeology. The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999.
63
Moore, Peter D., Collinson, Margaret E., Webb, J. A. Pollen analysis. 2nd ed. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications 1991.
64
Piperno, Dolores R. Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press 2006.
65
Torrence, Robin, Barton, Huw. Ancient starch research. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2006.
66
Bell M, Walker MJC. Evidence for environmental change. Late Quaternary environmental change: physical and human perspectives. Harlow: Pearson 2004:17–63.
67
Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as human ecology: method and theory for a contextual approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982.
68
O’Connor, Terri, Evans, John G. Environmental archaeology: principles and methods. 2nd rev. ed. Stroud: Sutton 2005.
69
Lowe JJ, Walker MJC. Biological evidence: chapter 4. Reconstructing Quaternary environments. Harlow: Prentice Hall 1997:162–236.
70
Bradshaw R. Spatial scale in the pollen record. Modelling ecological change: perspectives from neoecology, palaeoecology and environmental archaeology. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London 1991:41–52.
71
Buckland PC. Viking settlement, climate and environmental change around the north Atlantic. Issues in environmental archaeology: perspectives on its archaeological and public role. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London 1992:1–19.
72
Edwards KJ. Spatial scale and palynology: a commentary on Bradshaw. Modelling ecological change: perspectives from neoecology, palaeoecology and environmental archaeology. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London 1991:53–9.
73
Hillman G. Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: the application of ethnographic models from Turkey. Plants and ancient man: studies in palaeoethnobotany : proceedings of the Sixth Symposium of the International Work Group for Palaeoethnobotany, Groningen, 30 May-3 June 1983. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema 1984:1–42.
74
O’Connor T. 8th - 11th century economy and environment in York. Environment and economy in Anglo-Saxon England: a review of recent work on the environmental archaeology of rural and urban Anglo-Saxon settlements in England : proceedings of a conference held at the Museum of London, 9-10 April, 1990. London: Council for British Archaeology 1994:136–47.
75
Rackham DJ. Economy and environment in Saxon London. Environment and economy in Anglo-Saxon England: a review of recent work on the environmental archaeology of rural and urban Anglo-Saxon settlements in England : proceedings of a conference held at the Museum of London, 9-10 April, 1990. London: Council for British Archaeology 1994.
76
Smart TL, Hoffman ES. Environmental interpretation of archaeological charcoal. Current paleoethnobotany: analytical methods and cultural interpretations of archaeological plant remains. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1988:167–205.
77
Tallis JH, Switsur VR. Forest and moorland in the south Pennine uplands in the mid-Flandrian period. 1: macrofossil evidence of the former forest cover. Journal of Ecology. 1983;71.
78
Flannery KV. The village and its catchment area: introduction. The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009:91–5.
79
Flannery KV. Empirical determination of site catchments in Oaxaca and Tehuacan. The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009:103–17.
80
Rossman D. A site catchment analysis of San Lorenzo, Veracruz. The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009:95–103.
81
Zarky A. Statistical analysis of site catchments at Ocos, Guatemala. The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2009:117–28.
82
Craddock, P. T. Early metal mining and production. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 1995.
83
Henderson J. Metals. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: Routledge 2000:208–96.
84
Rehren Th, Pernicka E. Coins, artefacts and isotopes - archaeometallurgy and archaeometry. Archaeometry. 2008;50. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00389.x
85
Renfrew, Colin, Bahn, Paul G. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson 2008.
86
Tylecote, R. F. The early history of metallurgy in Europe. London: Longman 1987.
87
Henderson J. Ceramics. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: Routledge 2000:109–207.
88
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.
89
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1987.
90
Rice PM. Recent ceramic analysis: 1. function, style and origins. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1996;4:133–63.
91
Rice PM. On the origins of pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 1999;6:1–54.
92
Hamilton S. Between ritual and routine: interpreting prehistoric British pottery production and distribution. Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: Oxbow 2002.
93
Morris E. Staying alive: The function and use of prehistoric ceramics. Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: Oxbow 2002:54–61.
94
Woodward A, Blinkthorn J. Size is important: Iron Age vessel capacities in central and southern England. Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow 1997:21–35.
95
Caple, Chris. Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past. London: Routledge 2006.
96
Costin C. Craft production. Handbook of archaeological methods. Lanham, Md: Altamira Press 2005:1034–107.
97
Forbes, R. J. Studies in ancient technology: Vol.8. Leiden: Brill 1971.
98
Hodges, Henry. Artifacts: an introduction to early materials and technology. Duckworth 1989.
99
Hurcombe, L. M. Archaeological artefacts as material culture. London: Routledge 2007.
100
Shaw, Ian, Nicholson, Paul T. Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000.
101
Singer, Charles. A history of technology: Vol.1: From earliest times to fall of ancient empires. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1954.
102
The location of Alashiya: new evidence from petrographic investigation of Alashiyan tablets from el-Amarna and Ugarit. American Journal of Archaeology. 2003;107:233–55.
103
Izre’el S. The Amarna letters from Canaan. Civilizations of the ancient Near East. Peabody, Mass: Hendrickson 2000:2411–20.
104
Postgate N, Wang T, Wilkinson T. The evidence for early writing: utilitarian or ceremonial? Antiquity. 1995;69:459–80. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00081874
105
Serpico M, White R. The botanical identity and transport of incense during the Egyptian New Kingdom. Antiquity. 2000;74:884–97. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00060531
106
Andrén, Anders, Crozier, Alan. Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective. London: Plenum Press 1998.
107
Westbrook, Raymond, Cohen, Raymond. Amarna diplomacy: the beginnings of international relations. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press 2000.
108
Goren, Yuval, Artzy, Michal, Finkelstein, Israel, et al. Inscribed in clay: provenance study of the Amarna tablets and other ancient Near Eastern texts. Tel Aviv: Emery and Claire Yass Publications in Archaeology 2004.
109
Little BarbaraJ. Text-aided archaeology. Text-aided archaeology. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press 1992:1–6.
110
Moran, William L. The Amarna letters. English-language ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1992.
111
Rollston CA, Vaughn AG. Fakes, Forgeries and Biblical Scholarship. Near Eastern archaeology. 2005;68:61–72.
112
Weinstein JM. The Egyptian Empire in Palestine: a reassessment. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 1981;1–28.
113
DeBoer W. Interaction, imitation and communication as expressed in style: the Ucayali experience. The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989.
114
Conkey MW. Experimenting with style in archaeology: some historical and theoretical issues. The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989.
115
Hodder I. Re-opening Catalhoyuk. On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993-95. Cambridge: McDonald Institute 1996.
116
Hodder I. Peopling Catalhoyuk and its landscape. Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005.
117
Hodder I. Trashing rubbish. Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000.
118
Gero A. Assessing social information in material objects: how well do lithics measure up? Time, energy and stone tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989.
119
Binford LR. Interassemblage variability - the Mousterian and the functional argument. The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth 1973.
120
Baysal A, Wright K. Cooking, crafts and curation: the ground stone artefacts from Catalhoyuk, 1995-1999. Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005.
121
Wiessner P. Style and changing relations between the individual and society. The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic 1989.
122
L F. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. The archaeology of inequality. Oxford: Blackwell 1991.
123
Hill JD. Introduction. Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum 1995.
124
Price M. All in the family: the impact of gender and family constructs on the study of prehistoric settlement. Making places in the prehistoric world: themes in settlement archaeology. New York: Routledge 2003.
125
Ray L. The organization of space in Pompeii. Urban society in Roman Italy. London: UCL Press 1995.
126
Sanders D. Behavioural conventions and archaeology: methods for the analysis of ancient architecture. Domestic architecture and the use of space: an interdisciplinary cross-cultural study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990.
127
Ashmore W, Knapp AB. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers 1999.
128
Isaac G. Bones in contention: competing explanations for the juxtaposition of early Pleistocene artifacts and faunal remains. Animals and archaeology: 1: Hunters and their prey. Oxford: B.A.R. 1984.
129
Braun D. Pots as tools. Archaeological hammers and theories. New York: Academic Press 1983.
130
O’Connell JF. Ethnoarchaeology needs a general theory of behavior. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1995;3:205–55. doi: 10.1007/BF02231450
131
Longacre WA. Some aspects of prehistoric society in east-central Arizona. New%20perspectives%20in%20archeology. Chicago%20%3A: Aldine%20Publishing%20Company%2C 1968.
132
Orton C. Assemblages and sites. Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.
133
Debénath A, Dibble HL. Introduction. Handbook of paleolithic typology. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania 1993.
134
Hardy K. Where would we be without string? Ethnographic evidence for the use, manufacture and role of string in the Upper Palaeolithic. Plant processing form a prehistoric and ethnographic perspective: Préhistoire et ethnographie du travail des plantes : proceedings of a workshop at Ghent University (Belgium) November 28, 2006. Oxford: John & Erica Hedges 2007.
135
Kramer C. Spatial organization in contemporary southwest Asian villages and archaeological sampling. The Hilly flanks and beyond: essays on the prehistory of southwestern Asia presented to Robert J. Braidwood, November l5, l982. Chicago, Ill: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 1983.
136
Jeanne Sept. Archaeological Evidence and Ecological Perspectives for Reconstructing Early Hominid Subsistence Behavior. Archaeological Method and Theory. 1992;4:1–56.
137
Storey G. Estimating the population of ancient Roman cities. Integrating archaeological demography: multidisciplinary approaches to prehistoric population. [Carbondale, Ill.]: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale 1997.
138
Brown JA. On the structure of artifact typologies. Essays on archeological typology. Evanston, Ill: Center for American Archeology 1982.
139
Hill J, Evans R. A model for classification and typology. Models in archaeology. London: Methuen 1972.
140
Longacre WA. Archaeology as anthropology: a case study. Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Carbondale, Ill: Southern Illinois University Press 1972.
141
Hodder I. The decoration of containers: an ethnographic and historical study. Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press 1991.
142
Folorunso CA. Gender and archaeological site formation: ethnoarchaeological studies in parts of Nigeria. Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2007.
143
DeLoecker et al D. A re-fitter’s paradise. Lithic analysis at the Millennium. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2003.
144
DeBoer W, Lathrap D. The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics. Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. New York: Columbia University Press 1979.
145
Margaret C. Nelson. The Study of Technological Organization. Archaeological Method and Theory. 1991;3:57–100.
146
Hodder I. Crises in global archaeology. The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell 1999.
147
Whittaker J. Flintknapping: basic principles. Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: University of Texas Press 1994.
148
Banning E. Research design and sampling. The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data. New York: London 2000.
149
Dibble HL. Raw material availability, intensity of utilization and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. The Middle Paleolithic site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France). Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania 1995.
150
Hodder I. Developing a reflexive method in archaeology. Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000.
151
Hodder I. The integration of methods: introduction. Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000.
152
Rapp GR, Hill CL. Theoretical and historical overview. Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press 2006.
153
Binford, Lewis Roberts, Quimby, George I. An archaeological perspective. New York: Seminar Press 1972.
154
Clark JE. Politics, prismatic blades and Mesoamerican civilization. The organization of core technology. Boulder: Westview Press 1987.
155
Quine TA. Soil analysis and archaeological site formation studies. Archaeological sediments and soils: analysis, interpretation and management. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College, London 1995.
156
Wheeler REM. Introductory: chapter 1. Archaeology from the earth. Harmondsworth, Eng: Penguin 1956.
157
Thomson R. Leather working processes. Leather and fur: aspects of early medieval trade and technology. London: Archetype Pub. for the Archaeological Leather Group 1998.
158
Angus A. An introduction to the types of tannage used on ethnographic leather. The conservation of fur, feather and skin: seminar organised by the Conservators of Ethnographic Artefacts at the Museum of London on 11 December 2000. London: Archetype 2002.
159
Lowe JJ, Walker MJC. Biological evidence. Reconstructing Quaternary environments. Harlow: Prentice Hall 1997.
160
James A. Egypt and her vassals: the geopolitical dimension. Amarna diplomacy: the beginnings of international relations. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press 2000.
