1
David Nicholas, Kramer Carol. Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
2
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
3
Binford LR. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research 1981;37:195–208.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
4
Clarke D. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity 1973;47:6–18. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0003461X
5
Flannery KV. Research strategy and formative Mesoamerica; a prayer for an endangered species. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
6
Schiffer MB. Archaeological context and systemic context. American antiquity 1972;37:156–65.
7
Binford LB. A consideration of archaeological research design. American antiquity 1964;29:425–41.
8
Flannery KV. The golden marshalltown. American Anthropologist, New Series 1982;84:265–78.
9
Trigger BG. Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology. Antiquity 1970;44:26–37. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00040953
10
Schiffer MB. Formation processes. In: Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987. 143-150-199–217.
11
Wood W, Johnson D. A survey of disturbance processes in archaeological site formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1978;1.
12
Binford LR. Dimensional analysis of behaviour and site structure: learning from Eskimo hunting stand. American Antiquity 1978;43:330–61.
13
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;2:117–63. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
14
Andrefsky W. Raw material availability and organization of technology. American Antiquity 1994;59:21–34.
15
Binford LR. Forty-seven trips: A case study in the character of archaeological formation process. In: Working at archaeology. London: : Academic Press 1983. 243–68.
16
Binford LR. Organization and formation processes: looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 1979;35:255–73.
17
Hardy-Smith T, Edwards PC. The garbage crisis in prehistory: artefact discard patterns at the Early Natufian site of Wadi Hammeh 27 and the origins of household refuse disposal strategies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2004;23:253–89. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2004.05.001
18
Flannery KV, Winter M. Analyzing household activities. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009. 34–47.
19
LaMotta VM, Schiffer MB. Formation processes of house floor assemblages. In: The archaeology of household activities. London: : Routledge 1999. 19–29.
20
de Loecker et al. D. A re-fitter’s paradise. In: Lithic analysis at the Millennium. London: : Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2003. 113–36.
21
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;2:117–63. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
22
Hill JD. Introduction. In: Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: : Tempus Reparatum 1995. 1–11.
23
Kent S. The archaeological visibility of storage: delineating storage from trash areas. American Antiquity 1999;64:79–94.
24
Pigeot N. Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian etiolles. Archaeological review from Cambridge 1990;9:126–41.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2071af0-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
25
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
26
David N, Kramer C. Architecture: chapter 10. In: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. 284–302.
27
Parker Pearson M, Richards C. Ordering the world: perceptions of architecture, space and time. In: Architecture and order: approaches to social space. London: : Routledge 1994. 1–36.
28
Wilk RR, Rathje WL. Household Archaeology. American Behavioral Scientist 1982;25:617–39. doi:10.1177/000276482025006003
29
Smith ME. Household possessions and wealth in agrarian states: Implications for archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1987;6:297–335. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(87)90004-3
30
Steadman, Sharon R. Recent Research in the Archaeology of Architecture: Beyond the Foundations. Journal of Archaeological Research;4:51–93.
31
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
32
Fairclough G. Meaningful constructions – spatial and functional analysis of medieval buildings. Antiquity 1992;66:348–66. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00081461
33
Foster SM. Analysis of spatial patterns in buildings (access analysis) as an insight into social structure: examples from the Scottish Atlantic Iron Age. Antiquity 1989;63:40–50. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00075566
34
Grahame M. Public and private in the Roman house. In: Domestic space in the Roman world: Pompeii and beyond. Portsmouth, RI: : JRA 1997. 137–64.
35
Hill J. Broken K pueblo. In: New perspectives in archeology. Chicago: : Aldine 1968. 103–42.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=df51ecdd-029a-e711-80cb-005056af4099
36
Kramer C. An archaeological view of a contemporary Kurdish village: domestic architecture, household size and wealth . In: Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. Guildford: : Columbia University Press 1979. 139–63.
37
Wright K. The social origins of cooking and dining in early villages of western Asia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 2000;66.http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/25893/
38
The archaeology of the dead : lectures in archaeothanatology - University College London.
39
Michael Parker Perason. Form now to then: ethnoarchaeology and analogy. In: The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: : Sutton 1999. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=364ba8be-9666-e911-80cd-005056af4099
40
Lee, Frances, Roberts, Charlotte A., Bintliff, J. L. Burial archaeology: current research methods and developments. Oxford: : British Archaeological Reports 1989.
41
Scarre C. The meaning of death: funerary beliefs and the prehistorian. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 75–82.
42
Tainter, Joseph A. Mortuary Practices and the Study of Prehistoric Social Systems. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory;1:105–41.
43
Ucko PJ. Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains. World Archaeology 1969;1:262–80. doi:10.1080/00438243.1969.9979444
44
Whitley J. Too many ancestors. Antiquity 2002;76:119–26. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00089870
45
MacDonald DH. Grief and Burial in the American Southwest: The Role of Evolutionary Theory in the Interpretation of Mortuary Remains. American Antiquity 2001;66:704–14. doi:10.2307/2694183
46
Parker Pearson M. Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnographical study. In: Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982. 99–113.
47
Rega E. Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. In: Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. London: : Leicester University Press 1996. 229–47.
48
Reynolds, Andrew. Anglo-Saxon deviant burial customs. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
49
Shennan S. The social organization at Branč. Antiquity 1975;49:279–88. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00070319
50
Aufderheide, Arthur C., Rodríguez-Martín, Conrado, Langsjoen, Odin. The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology. Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
51
Brothwell, Don R., British Museum (Natural History). Digging up bones: the excavation, treatment and study of human skeletal remains. 3rd ed. London: : British Museum (Natural History) 1981.
52
Aftandilian, David, Ubelaker, Douglas H., Haas, Jonathan, et al. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains: proceedings of a seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History, organized by Jonathan Haas. Fayetteville, Ark: : Arkansas Archeological Survey 1994.
53
Hillson, Simon. Dental anthropology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
54
White, T. D., Folkens, Pieter A., Black, Michael Timothy. Human osteology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: : Academic 2012.
55
Cherry J. Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state. In: Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1987. 146–72.
56
David, Nicholas, Kramer, Carol. Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
57
Binford LR. Willow smoke and dog’s tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity 1980;45:4–20.
58
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
59
Pires-Ferreira J. Shell and iron-ore mirror exchange in Formative Mesoamerica. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009. 311–28.
60
Roth A, editor. Social change in the Fourth Dynasty (Egypt): the spatial organization of pyramids, tombs and cemeteries. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 1993;30.
61
Winter M. Distribution of obsidian among households in two Oaxacan villages. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009. 306–11.
62
Juggins S, Cameron N. Diatoms and archaeology. In: The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999.
63
Moore, Peter D., Collinson, Margaret E., Webb, J. A. Pollen analysis. 2nd ed. Boston: : Blackwell Scientific Publications 1991.
64
Piperno, Dolores R. Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. Lanham, Md: : AltaMira Press 2006.
65
Torrence, Robin, Barton, Huw. Ancient starch research. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2006.
66
Bell M, Walker MJC. Evidence for environmental change. In: Late Quaternary environmental change: physical and human perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson 2004. 17–63.
67
Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as human ecology: method and theory for a contextual approach. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982.
68
O’Connor, Terri, Evans, John G. Environmental archaeology: principles and methods. 2nd rev. ed. Stroud: : Sutton 2005.
69
Lowe JJ, Walker MJC. Biological evidence: chapter 4. In: Reconstructing Quaternary environments. Harlow: : Prentice Hall 1997. 162–236.
70
Bradshaw R. Spatial scale in the pollen record. In: Modelling ecological change: perspectives from neoecology, palaeoecology and environmental archaeology. London: : Institute of Archaeology, University College London 1991. 41–52.
71
Buckland PC. Viking settlement, climate and environmental change around the north Atlantic. In: Issues in environmental archaeology: perspectives on its archaeological and public role. London: : Institute of Archaeology, University College London 1992. 1–19.
72
Edwards KJ. Spatial scale and palynology: a commentary on Bradshaw. In: Modelling ecological change: perspectives from neoecology, palaeoecology and environmental archaeology. London: : Institute of Archaeology, University College London 1991. 53–9.
73
Hillman G. Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: the application of ethnographic models from Turkey. In: Plants and ancient man: studies in palaeoethnobotany : proceedings of the Sixth Symposium of the International Work Group for Palaeoethnobotany, Groningen, 30 May-3 June 1983. Rotterdam: : A.A. Balkema 1984. 1–42.
74
O’Connor T. 8th - 11th century economy and environment in York. In: Environment and economy in Anglo-Saxon England: a review of recent work on the environmental archaeology of rural and urban Anglo-Saxon settlements in England : proceedings of a conference held at the Museum of London, 9-10 April, 1990. London: : Council for British Archaeology 1994. 136–47.
75
Rackham DJ. Economy and environment in Saxon London. In: Environment and economy in Anglo-Saxon England: a review of recent work on the environmental archaeology of rural and urban Anglo-Saxon settlements in England : proceedings of a conference held at the Museum of London, 9-10 April, 1990. London: : Council for British Archaeology 1994.
76
Smart TL, Hoffman ES. Environmental interpretation of archaeological charcoal. In: Current paleoethnobotany: analytical methods and cultural interpretations of archaeological plant remains. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1988. 167–205.
77
Tallis JH, Switsur VR. Forest and moorland in the south Pennine uplands in the mid-Flandrian period. 1: macrofossil evidence of the former forest cover. Journal of Ecology 1983;71.
78
Flannery KV. The village and its catchment area: introduction. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009. 91–5.
79
Flannery KV. Empirical determination of site catchments in Oaxaca and Tehuacan. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009. 103–17.
80
Rossman D. A site catchment analysis of San Lorenzo, Veracruz. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009. 95–103.
81
Zarky A. Statistical analysis of site catchments at Ocos, Guatemala. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009. 117–28.
82
Craddock, P. T. Early metal mining and production. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1995.
83
Henderson J. Metals. In: The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: : Routledge 2000. 208–96.
84
Rehren Th, Pernicka E. Coins, artefacts and isotopes - archaeometallurgy and archaeometry. Archaeometry 2008;50. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00389.x
85
Renfrew, Colin, Bahn, Paul G. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.
86
Tylecote, R. F. The early history of metallurgy in Europe. London: : Longman 1987.
87
Henderson J. Ceramics. In: The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: : Routledge 2000. 109–207.
88
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920066
89
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987.
90
Rice PM. Recent ceramic analysis: 1. function, style and origins. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:133–63.
91
Rice PM. On the origins of pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1999;6:1–54.
92
Hamilton S. Between ritual and routine: interpreting prehistoric British pottery production and distribution. In: Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: : Oxbow 2002. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47541.pdf
93
Morris E. Staying alive: The function and use of prehistoric ceramics. In: Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: : Oxbow 2002. 54–61.
94
Woodward A, Blinkthorn J. Size is important: Iron Age vessel capacities in central and southern England. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997. 21–35.
95
Caple, Chris. Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past. London: : Routledge 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203409060
96
Costin C. Craft production. In: Handbook of archaeological methods. Lanham, Md: : Altamira Press 2005. 1034–107.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=364d506d-ef01-e811-80cd-005056af4099
97
Forbes, R. J. Studies in ancient technology: Vol.8. Leiden: : Brill 1971.
98
Hodges, Henry. Artifacts: an introduction to early materials and technology. Duckworth 1989.
99
Hurcombe, L. M. Archaeological artefacts as material culture. London: : Routledge 2007.
100
Shaw, Ian, Nicholson, Paul T. Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
101
Singer, Charles. A history of technology: Vol.1: From earliest times to fall of ancient empires. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1954.
102
The location of Alashiya: new evidence from petrographic investigation of Alashiyan tablets from el-Amarna and Ugarit. American Journal of Archaeology 2003;107:233–55.
103
Izre’el S. The Amarna letters from Canaan. In: Civilizations of the ancient Near East. Peabody, Mass: : Hendrickson 2000. 2411–20.
104
Postgate N, Wang T, Wilkinson T. The evidence for early writing: utilitarian or ceremonial? Antiquity 1995;69:459–80. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00081874
105
Serpico M, White R. The botanical identity and transport of incense during the Egyptian New Kingdom. Antiquity 2000;74:884–97. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00060531
106
Andrén, Anders, Crozier, Alan. Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective. London: : Plenum Press 1998.
107
Westbrook, Raymond, Cohen, Raymond. Amarna diplomacy: the beginnings of international relations. Baltimore, Md: : Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press 2000. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb30995.0001.001
108
Goren, Yuval, Artzy, Michal, Finkelstein, Israel, et al. Inscribed in clay: provenance study of the Amarna tablets and other ancient Near Eastern texts. Tel Aviv: : Emery and Claire Yass Publications in Archaeology 2004.
109
Little BarbaraJ. Text-aided archaeology. In: Text-aided archaeology. Boca Raton, Fla: : CRC Press 1992. 1–6.
110
Moran, William L. The Amarna letters. English-language ed. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins University Press 1992.
111
Rollston CA, Vaughn AG. Fakes, Forgeries and Biblical Scholarship. Near Eastern archaeology 2005;68:61–72.
112
Weinstein JM. The Egyptian Empire in Palestine: a reassessment. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 1981;:1–28.
113
DeBoer W. Interaction, imitation and communication as expressed in style: the Ucayali experience. In: The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47546.pdf
114
Conkey MW. Experimenting with style in archaeology: some historical and theoretical issues. In: The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
115
Hodder I. Re-opening Catalhoyuk. In: On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993-95. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute 1996. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42228.pdf
116
Hodder I. Peopling Catalhoyuk and its landscape. In: Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42229.pdf
117
Hodder I. Trashing rubbish. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42230.pdf
118
Gero A. Assessing social information in material objects: how well do lithics measure up? In: Time, energy and stone tools. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42231.pdf
119
Binford LR. Interassemblage variability - the Mousterian and the functional argument. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: : Duckworth 1973. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42232.pdf
120
Baysal A, Wright K. Cooking, crafts and curation: the ground stone artefacts from Catalhoyuk, 1995-1999. In: Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42233.pdf
121
Wiessner P. Style and changing relations between the individual and society. In: The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: : Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic 1989. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42234.pdf
122
L F. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. In: The archaeology of inequality. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42235.pdf
123
Hill JD. Introduction. In: Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: : Tempus Reparatum 1995. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42258.pdf
124
Price M. All in the family: the impact of gender and family constructs on the study of prehistoric settlement. In: Making places in the prehistoric world: themes in settlement archaeology. New York: : Routledge 2003. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42260.pdf
125
Ray L. The organization of space in Pompeii. In: Urban society in Roman Italy. London: : UCL Press 1995. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42261.pdf
126
Sanders D. Behavioural conventions and archaeology: methods for the analysis of ancient architecture. In: Domestic architecture and the use of space: an interdisciplinary cross-cultural study. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42262.pdf
127
Ashmore W, Knapp AB. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. In: Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Publishers 1999. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42263.pdf
128
Isaac G. Bones in contention: competing explanations for the juxtaposition of early Pleistocene artifacts and faunal remains. In: Animals and archaeology: 1: Hunters and their prey. Oxford: : B.A.R. 1984. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42266.pdf
129
Braun D. Pots as tools. In: Archaeological hammers and theories. New York: : Academic Press 1983.
130
O’Connell JF. Ethnoarchaeology needs a general theory of behavior. Journal of Archaeological Research 1995;3:205–55. doi:10.1007/BF02231450
131
Longacre WA. Some aspects of prehistoric society in east-central Arizona. In: New%20perspectives%20in%20archeology. Chicago%20%3A: : Aldine%20Publishing%20Company%2C 1968. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47544.pdf
132
Orton C. Assemblages and sites. In: Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511920066
133
Debénath A, Dibble HL. Introduction. In: Handbook of paleolithic typology. Philadelphia: : University Museum, University of Pennsylvania 1993.
134
Hardy K. Where would we be without string? Ethnographic evidence for the use, manufacture and role of string in the Upper Palaeolithic. In: Plant processing form a prehistoric and ethnographic perspective: Préhistoire et ethnographie du travail des plantes : proceedings of a workshop at Ghent University (Belgium) November 28, 2006. Oxford: : John & Erica Hedges 2007. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47552.pdf
135
Kramer C. Spatial organization in contemporary southwest Asian villages and archaeological sampling. In: The Hilly flanks and beyond: essays on the prehistory of southwestern Asia presented to Robert J. Braidwood, November l5, l982. Chicago, Ill: : Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 1983. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47553.pdf
136
Jeanne Sept. Archaeological Evidence and Ecological Perspectives for Reconstructing Early Hominid Subsistence Behavior. Archaeological Method and Theory 1992;4:1–56.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170220
137
Storey G. Estimating the population of ancient Roman cities. In: Integrating archaeological demography: multidisciplinary approaches to prehistoric population. [Carbondale, Ill.]: : Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale 1997. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47556.pdf
138
Brown JA. On the structure of artifact typologies. In: Essays on archeological typology. Evanston, Ill: : Center for American Archeology 1982. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47557.pdf
139
Hill J, Evans R. A model for classification and typology. In: Models in archaeology. London: : Methuen 1972. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47558.pdf
140
Longacre WA. Archaeology as anthropology: a case study. In: Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Carbondale, Ill: : Southern Illinois University Press 1972. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47559.pdf
141
Hodder I. The decoration of containers: an ethnographic and historical study. In: Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Tucson: : University of Arizona Press 1991. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47560.pdf
142
Folorunso CA. Gender and archaeological site formation: ethnoarchaeological studies in parts of Nigeria. In: Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47580.pdf
143
DeLoecker et al D. A re-fitter’s paradise. In: Lithic analysis at the Millennium. London: : Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2003. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47582.pdf
144
DeBoer W, Lathrap D. The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics. In: Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. New York: : Columbia University Press 1979. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47583.pdf
145
Margaret C. Nelson. The Study of Technological Organization. Archaeological Method and Theory 1991;3:57–100.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170213
146
Hodder I. Crises in global archaeology. In: The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47585.pdf
147
Whittaker J. Flintknapping: basic principles. In: Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1994. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47586.pdf
148
Banning E. Research design and sampling. In: The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data. New York: : London 2000.
149
Dibble HL. Raw material availability, intensity of utilization and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. In: The Middle Paleolithic site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France). Philadelphia: : University Museum, University of Pennsylvania 1995.
150
Hodder I. Developing a reflexive method in archaeology. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000.
151
Hodder I. The integration of methods: introduction. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000.
152
Rapp GR, Hill CL. Theoretical and historical overview. In: Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: : Yale University Press 2006. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47601.pdf
153
Binford, Lewis Roberts, Quimby, George I. An archaeological perspective. New York: : Seminar Press 1972.
154
Clark JE. Politics, prismatic blades and Mesoamerican civilization. In: The organization of core technology. Boulder: : Westview Press 1987. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47725.pdf
155
Quine TA. Soil analysis and archaeological site formation studies. In: Archaeological sediments and soils: analysis, interpretation and management. London: : Institute of Archaeology, University College, London 1995. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49623.pdf
156
Wheeler REM. Introductory: chapter 1. In: Archaeology from the earth. Harmondsworth, Eng: : Penguin 1956. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49627.pdf
157
Thomson R. Leather working processes. In: Leather and fur: aspects of early medieval trade and technology. London: : Archetype Pub. for the Archaeological Leather Group 1998. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49628.pdf
158
Angus A. An introduction to the types of tannage used on ethnographic leather. In: The conservation of fur, feather and skin: seminar organised by the Conservators of Ethnographic Artefacts at the Museum of London on 11 December 2000. London: : Archetype 2002. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49629.pdf
159
Lowe JJ, Walker MJC. Biological evidence. In: Reconstructing Quaternary environments. Harlow: : Prentice Hall 1997. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_50505.pdf
160
James A. Egypt and her vassals: the geopolitical dimension. In: Amarna diplomacy: the beginnings of international relations. Baltimore, Md: : Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press 2000. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_50557.pdf
