1.
David Nicholas, Kramer Carol. Ethnoarchaeology in action. Vol. Cambridge world archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
2.
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009.
3.
Binford LR. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research [Internet]. 1981;37(3):195–208. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
4.
Clarke D. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973 Mar;47(185):6–18.
5.
Flannery KV. Research strategy and formative Mesoamerica; a prayer for an endangered species. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009.
6.
Schiffer MB. Archaeological context and systemic context. American antiquity. 1972;37(2):156–65.
7.
Binford LB. A consideration of archaeological research design. American antiquity. 1964;29(4):425–41.
8.
Flannery KV. The golden marshalltown. American Anthropologist, New Series. 1982;84(2):265–78.
9.
Trigger BG. Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology. Antiquity. 1970 Mar;44(173):26–37.
10.
Schiffer MB. Formation processes. In: Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press; 1987. p. 143-150-199–217.
11.
Wood W, Johnson D. A survey of disturbance processes in archaeological site formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1978;1.
12.
Binford LR. Dimensional analysis of behaviour and site structure: learning from Eskimo hunting stand. American Antiquity. 1978;43(3):330–61.
13.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2(2):117–63.
14.
Andrefsky W. Raw material availability and organization of technology. American Antiquity. 1994;59(1):21–34.
15.
Binford LR. Forty-seven trips: A case study in the character of archaeological formation process. In: Working at archaeology. London: Academic Press; 1983. p. 243–68.
16.
Binford LR. Organization and formation processes: looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research. 1979;35(3):255–73.
17.
Hardy-Smith T, Edwards PC. The garbage crisis in prehistory: artefact discard patterns at the Early Natufian site of Wadi Hammeh 27 and the origins of household refuse disposal strategies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2004;23(3):253–89.
18.
Flannery KV, Winter M. Analyzing household activities. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 34–47.
19.
LaMotta VM, Schiffer MB. Formation processes of house floor assemblages. In: The archaeology of household activities. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 19–29.
20.
de Loecker et al. D. A re-fitter’s paradise. In: Lithic analysis at the Millennium. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 2003. p. 113–36.
21.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2(2):117–63.
22.
Hill JD. Introduction. In: Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum; 1995. p. 1–11.
23.
Kent S. The archaeological visibility of storage: delineating storage from trash areas. American Antiquity. 1999;64(1):79–94.
24.
Pigeot N. Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian etiolles. Archaeological review from Cambridge [Internet]. 1990;9(1):126–41. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2071af0-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
25.
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009.
26.
David N, Kramer C. Architecture: chapter 10. In: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 284–302.
27.
Parker Pearson M, Richards C. Ordering the world: perceptions of architecture, space and time. In: Architecture and order: approaches to social space. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 1–36.
28.
Wilk RR, Rathje WL. Household Archaeology. American Behavioral Scientist. 1982 Jul;25(6):617–39.
29.
Smith ME. Household possessions and wealth in agrarian states: Implications for archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1987;6(4):297–335.
30.
Steadman, Sharon R. Recent Research in the Archaeology of Architecture: Beyond the Foundations. Journal of Archaeological Research. 4(1):51–93.
31.
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009.
32.
Fairclough G. Meaningful constructions – spatial and functional analysis of medieval buildings. Antiquity. 1992 Jun;66(251):348–66.
33.
Foster SM. Analysis of spatial patterns in buildings (access analysis) as an insight into social structure: examples from the Scottish Atlantic Iron Age. Antiquity. 1989 Mar;63(238):40–50.
34.
Grahame M. Public and private in the Roman house. In: Domestic space in the Roman world: Pompeii and beyond. Portsmouth, RI: JRA; 1997. p. 137–64.
35.
Hill J. Broken K pueblo. In: New perspectives in archeology [Internet]. Chicago: Aldine; 1968. p. 103–42. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=df51ecdd-029a-e711-80cb-005056af4099
36.
Kramer C. An archaeological view of a contemporary Kurdish village: domestic architecture, household size and wealth . In: Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. Guildford: Columbia University Press; 1979. p. 139–63.
37.
Wright K. The social origins of cooking and dining in early villages of western Asia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society [Internet]. 2000;66. Available from: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/25893/
38.
The archaeology of the dead : lectures in archaeothanatology - University College London.
39.
Michael Parker Perason. Form now to then: ethnoarchaeology and analogy. In: The archaeology of death and burial [Internet]. Stroud: Sutton; 1999. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=364ba8be-9666-e911-80cd-005056af4099
40.
Lee, Frances, Roberts, Charlotte A., Bintliff, J. L. Burial archaeology: current research methods and developments. Vol. BAR British series. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports; 1989.
41.
Scarre C. The meaning of death: funerary beliefs and the prehistorian. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 75–82.
42.
Tainter, Joseph A. Mortuary Practices and the Study of Prehistoric Social Systems. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1:105–41.
43.
Ucko PJ. Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains. World Archaeology. 1969 Oct;1(2):262–80.
44.
Whitley J. Too many ancestors. Antiquity. 2002 Mar;76(291):119–26.
45.
MacDonald DH. Grief and Burial in the American Southwest: The Role of Evolutionary Theory in the Interpretation of Mortuary Remains. American Antiquity. 2001 Oct;66(04):704–14.
46.
Parker Pearson M. Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnographical study. In: Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 99–113.
47.
Rega E. Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. In: Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. London: Leicester University Press; 1996. p. 229–47.
48.
Reynolds, Andrew. Anglo-Saxon deviant burial customs. Vol. Medieval history and archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
49.
Shennan S. The social organization at Branč. Antiquity. 1975 Dec;49(196):279–88.
50.
Aufderheide, Arthur C., Rodríguez-Martín, Conrado, Langsjoen, Odin. The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
51.
Brothwell, Don R., British Museum (Natural History). Digging up bones: the excavation, treatment and study of human skeletal remains. 3rd ed. London: British Museum (Natural History); 1981.
52.
Aftandilian, David, Ubelaker, Douglas H., Haas, Jonathan, Buikstra, Jane E., Field Museum of Natural History. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains: proceedings of a seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History, organized by Jonathan Haas. Vol. Arkansas Archeological Survey research series. Fayetteville, Ark: Arkansas Archeological Survey; 1994.
53.
Hillson, Simon. Dental anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
54.
White, T. D., Folkens, Pieter A., Black, Michael Timothy. Human osteology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic; 2012.
55.
Cherry J. Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state. In: Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1987. p. 146–72.
56.
David, Nicholas, Kramer, Carol. Ethnoarchaeology in action. Vol. Cambridge world archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
57.
Binford LR. Willow smoke and dog’s tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity. 1980;45(1):4–20.
58.
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009.
59.
Pires-Ferreira J. Shell and iron-ore mirror exchange in Formative Mesoamerica. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 311–28.
60.
Roth A, editor. Social change in the Fourth Dynasty (Egypt): the spatial organization of pyramids, tombs and cemeteries. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt. 1993;30.
61.
Winter M. Distribution of obsidian among households in two Oaxacan villages. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 306–11.
62.
Juggins S, Cameron N. Diatoms and archaeology. In: The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
63.
Moore, Peter D., Collinson, Margaret E., Webb, J. A. Pollen analysis. 2nd ed. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1991.
64.
Piperno, Dolores R. Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press; 2006.
65.
Torrence, Robin, Barton, Huw. Ancient starch research. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2006.
66.
Bell M, Walker MJC. Evidence for environmental change. In: Late Quaternary environmental change: physical and human perspectives. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2004. p. 17–63.
67.
Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as human ecology: method and theory for a contextual approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
68.
O’Connor, Terri, Evans, John G. Environmental archaeology: principles and methods. 2nd rev. ed. Stroud: Sutton; 2005.
69.
Lowe JJ, Walker MJC. Biological evidence: chapter 4. In: Reconstructing Quaternary environments. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall; 1997. p. 162–236.
70.
Bradshaw R. Spatial scale in the pollen record. In: Modelling ecological change: perspectives from neoecology, palaeoecology and environmental archaeology. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 1991. p. 41–52.
71.
Buckland PC. Viking settlement, climate and environmental change around the north Atlantic. In: Issues in environmental archaeology: perspectives on its archaeological and public role. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 1992. p. 1–19.
72.
Edwards KJ. Spatial scale and palynology: a commentary on Bradshaw. In: Modelling ecological change: perspectives from neoecology, palaeoecology and environmental archaeology. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 1991. p. 53–9.
73.
Hillman G. Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: the application of ethnographic models from Turkey. In: Plants and ancient man: studies in palaeoethnobotany : proceedings of the Sixth Symposium of the International Work Group for Palaeoethnobotany, Groningen, 30 May-3 June 1983. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema; 1984. p. 1–42.
74.
O’Connor T. 8th - 11th century economy and environment in York. In: Environment and economy in Anglo-Saxon England: a review of recent work on the environmental archaeology of rural and urban Anglo-Saxon settlements in England : proceedings of a conference held at the Museum of London, 9-10 April, 1990. London: Council for British Archaeology; 1994. p. 136–47.
75.
Rackham DJ. Economy and environment in Saxon London. In: Environment and economy in Anglo-Saxon England: a review of recent work on the environmental archaeology of rural and urban Anglo-Saxon settlements in England : proceedings of a conference held at the Museum of London, 9-10 April, 1990. London: Council for British Archaeology; 1994.
76.
Smart TL, Hoffman ES. Environmental interpretation of archaeological charcoal. In: Current paleoethnobotany: analytical methods and cultural interpretations of archaeological plant remains. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988. p. 167–205.
77.
Tallis JH, Switsur VR. Forest and moorland in the south Pennine uplands in the mid-Flandrian period. 1: macrofossil evidence of the former forest cover. Journal of Ecology. 1983;71(2).
78.
Flannery KV. The village and its catchment area: introduction. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 91–5.
79.
Flannery KV. Empirical determination of site catchments in Oaxaca and Tehuacan. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 103–17.
80.
Rossman D. A site catchment analysis of San Lorenzo, Veracruz. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 95–103.
81.
Zarky A. Statistical analysis of site catchments at Ocos, Guatemala. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 117–28.
82.
Craddock, P. T. Early metal mining and production. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1995.
83.
Henderson J. Metals. In: The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 208–96.
84.
Rehren Th, Pernicka E. Coins, artefacts and isotopes - archaeometallurgy and archaeometry. Archaeometry. 2008;50(2).
85.
Renfrew, Colin, Bahn, Paul G. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
86.
Tylecote, R. F. The early history of metallurgy in Europe. Vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman; 1987.
87.
Henderson J. Ceramics. In: The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 109–207.
88.
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in archaeology [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920066
89.
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
90.
Rice PM. Recent ceramic analysis: 1. function, style and origins. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1996;4(2):133–63.
91.
Rice PM. On the origins of pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 1999;6(1):1–54.
92.
Hamilton S. Between ritual and routine: interpreting prehistoric British pottery production and distribution. In: Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis [Internet]. Oxford: Oxbow; 2002. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47541.pdf
93.
Morris E. Staying alive: The function and use of prehistoric ceramics. In: Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: Oxbow; 2002. p. 54–61.
94.
Woodward A, Blinkthorn J. Size is important: Iron Age vessel capacities in central and southern England. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow; 1997. p. 21–35.
95.
Caple, Chris. Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2006. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203409060
96.
Costin C. Craft production. In: Handbook of archaeological methods [Internet]. Lanham, Md: Altamira Press; 2005. p. 1034–107. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=364d506d-ef01-e811-80cd-005056af4099
97.
Forbes, R. J. Studies in ancient technology: Vol.8. Vol. Studies in ancient technology. Leiden: Brill; 1971.
98.
Hodges, Henry. Artifacts: an introduction to early materials and technology. Duckworth; 1989.
99.
Hurcombe, L. M. Archaeological artefacts as material culture. London: Routledge; 2007.
100.
Shaw, Ian, Nicholson, Paul T. Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
101.
Singer, Charles. A history of technology: Vol.1: From earliest times to fall of ancient empires. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1954.
102.
The location of Alashiya: new evidence from petrographic investigation of Alashiyan tablets from el-Amarna and Ugarit. American Journal of Archaeology. 2003;107(2):233–55.
103.
Izre’el S. The Amarna letters from Canaan. In: Civilizations of the ancient Near East. Peabody, Mass: Hendrickson; 2000. p. 2411–20.
104.
Postgate N, Wang T, Wilkinson T. The evidence for early writing: utilitarian or ceremonial? Antiquity. 1995 Sep;69(264):459–80.
105.
Serpico M, White R. The botanical identity and transport of incense during the Egyptian New Kingdom. Antiquity. 2000 Dec;74(286):884–97.
106.
Andrén, Anders, Crozier, Alan. Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective. Vol. Contributions to global historical archaeology. London: Plenum Press; 1998.
107.
Westbrook, Raymond, Cohen, Raymond. Amarna diplomacy: the beginnings of international relations [Internet]. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press; 2000. Available from: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb30995.0001.001
108.
Goren, Yuval, Artzy, Michal, Finkelstein, Israel, Naʼaman, Nadav, Makhon le-arkheʼologyah ʻa. sh. Sonyah u-Marḳo Nadler. Inscribed in clay: provenance study of the Amarna tablets and other ancient Near Eastern texts. Vol. Monograph series / Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archeology. Tel Aviv: Emery and Claire Yass Publications in Archaeology; 2004.
109.
Little BarbaraJ. Text-aided archaeology. In: Text-aided archaeology. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1992. p. 1–6.
110.
Moran, William L. The Amarna letters. English-language ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1992.
111.
Rollston CA, Vaughn AG. Fakes, Forgeries and Biblical Scholarship. Near Eastern archaeology. 2005;68(1/2):61–72.
112.
Weinstein JM. The Egyptian Empire in Palestine: a reassessment. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 1981;(241):1–28.
113.
DeBoer W. Interaction, imitation and communication as expressed in style: the Ucayali experience. In: The uses of style in archaeology [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47546.pdf
114.
Conkey MW. Experimenting with style in archaeology: some historical and theoretical issues. In: The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
115.
Hodder I. Re-opening Catalhoyuk. In: On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993-95 [Internet]. Cambridge: McDonald Institute; 1996. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42228.pdf
116.
Hodder I. Peopling Catalhoyuk and its landscape. In: Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons [Internet]. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2005. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42229.pdf
117.
Hodder I. Trashing rubbish. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team [Internet]. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2000. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42230.pdf
118.
Gero A. Assessing social information in material objects: how well do lithics measure up? In: Time, energy and stone tools [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42231.pdf
119.
Binford LR. Interassemblage variability - the Mousterian and the functional argument. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory [Internet]. London: Duckworth; 1973. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42232.pdf
120.
Baysal A, Wright K. Cooking, crafts and curation: the ground stone artefacts from Catalhoyuk, 1995-1999. In: Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons [Internet]. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2005. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42233.pdf
121.
Wiessner P. Style and changing relations between the individual and society. In: The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression [Internet]. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic; 1989. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42234.pdf
122.
L F. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. In: The archaeology of inequality [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42235.pdf
123.
Hill JD. Introduction. In: Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record [Internet]. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum; 1995. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42258.pdf
124.
Price M. All in the family: the impact of gender and family constructs on the study of prehistoric settlement. In: Making places in the prehistoric world: themes in settlement archaeology [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2003. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42260.pdf
125.
Ray L. The organization of space in Pompeii. In: Urban society in Roman Italy [Internet]. London: UCL Press; 1995. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42261.pdf
126.
Sanders D. Behavioural conventions and archaeology: methods for the analysis of ancient architecture. In: Domestic architecture and the use of space: an interdisciplinary cross-cultural study [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42262.pdf
127.
Ashmore W, Knapp AB. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. In: Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives [Internet]. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers; 1999. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42263.pdf
128.
Isaac G. Bones in contention: competing explanations for the juxtaposition of early Pleistocene artifacts and faunal remains. In: Animals and archaeology: 1: Hunters and their prey [Internet]. Oxford: B.A.R.; 1984. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42266.pdf
129.
Braun D. Pots as tools. In: Archaeological hammers and theories. New York: Academic Press; 1983.
130.
O’Connell JF. Ethnoarchaeology needs a general theory of behavior. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1995 Sep;3(3):205–55.
131.
Longacre WA. Some aspects of prehistoric society in east-central Arizona. In: New%20perspectives%20in%20archeology [Internet]. Chicago%20%3A: Aldine%20Publishing%20Company%2C; 1968. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47544.pdf
132.
Orton C. Assemblages and sites. In: Pottery in archaeology [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47545.pdf
133.
Debénath A, Dibble HL. Introduction. In: Handbook of paleolithic typology. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania; 1993.
134.
Hardy K. Where would we be without string? Ethnographic evidence for the use, manufacture and role of string in the Upper Palaeolithic. In: Plant processing form a prehistoric and ethnographic perspective: Préhistoire et ethnographie du travail des plantes : proceedings of a workshop at Ghent University (Belgium) November 28, 2006 [Internet]. Oxford: John & Erica Hedges; 2007. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47552.pdf
135.
Kramer C. Spatial organization in contemporary southwest Asian villages and archaeological sampling. In: The Hilly flanks and beyond: essays on the prehistory of southwestern Asia presented to Robert J Braidwood, November l5, l982 [Internet]. Chicago, Ill: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago; 1983. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47553.pdf
136.
Jeanne Sept. Archaeological Evidence and Ecological Perspectives for Reconstructing Early Hominid Subsistence Behavior. Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 1992;4:1–56. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170220
137.
Storey G. Estimating the population of ancient Roman cities. In: Integrating archaeological demography: multidisciplinary approaches to prehistoric population [Internet]. [Carbondale, Ill.]: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale; 1997. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47556.pdf
138.
Brown JA. On the structure of artifact typologies. In: Essays on archeological typology [Internet]. Evanston, Ill: Center for American Archeology; 1982. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47557.pdf
139.
Hill J, Evans R. A model for classification and typology. In: Models in archaeology [Internet]. London: Methuen; 1972. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47558.pdf
140.
Longacre WA. Archaeology as anthropology: a case study. In: Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions [Internet]. Carbondale, Ill: Southern Illinois University Press; 1972. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47559.pdf
141.
Hodder I. The decoration of containers: an ethnographic and historical study. In: Ceramic ethnoarchaeology [Internet]. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1991. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47560.pdf
142.
Folorunso CA. Gender and archaeological site formation: ethnoarchaeological studies in parts of Nigeria. In: Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues [Internet]. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2007. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47580.pdf
143.
DeLoecker et al D. A re-fitter’s paradise. In: Lithic analysis at the Millennium [Internet]. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 2003. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47582.pdf
144.
DeBoer W, Lathrap D. The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics. In: Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology [Internet]. New York: Columbia University Press; 1979. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47583.pdf
145.
Margaret C. Nelson. The Study of Technological Organization. Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 1991;3:57–100. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170213
146.
Hodder I. Crises in global archaeology. In: The archaeological process: an introduction [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47585.pdf
147.
Whittaker J. Flintknapping: basic principles. In: Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools [Internet]. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1994. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47586.pdf
148.
Banning E. Research design and sampling. In: The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data. New York: London; 2000.
149.
Dibble HL. Raw material availability, intensity of utilization and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. In: The Middle Paleolithic site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France). Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania; 1995.
150.
Hodder I. Developing a reflexive method in archaeology. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2000.
151.
Hodder I. The integration of methods: introduction. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2000.
152.
Rapp GR, Hill CL. Theoretical and historical overview. In: Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation [Internet]. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2006. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47601.pdf
153.
Binford, Lewis Roberts, Quimby, George I. An archaeological perspective. Vol. Studies in archeology. New York: Seminar Press; 1972.
154.
Clark JE. Politics, prismatic blades and Mesoamerican civilization. In: The organization of core technology [Internet]. Boulder: Westview Press; 1987. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47725.pdf
155.
Quine TA. Soil analysis and archaeological site formation studies. In: Archaeological sediments and soils: analysis, interpretation and management [Internet]. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College, London; 1995. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49623.pdf
156.
Wheeler REM. Introductory: chapter 1. In: Archaeology from the earth [Internet]. Harmondsworth, Eng: Penguin; 1956. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49627.pdf
157.
Thomson R. Leather working processes. In: Leather and fur: aspects of early medieval trade and technology [Internet]. London: Archetype Pub. for the Archaeological Leather Group; 1998. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49628.pdf
158.
Angus A. An introduction to the types of tannage used on ethnographic leather. In: The conservation of fur, feather and skin: seminar organised by the Conservators of Ethnographic Artefacts at the Museum of London on 11 December 2000 [Internet]. London: Archetype; 2002. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49629.pdf
159.
Lowe JJ, Walker MJC. Biological evidence. In: Reconstructing Quaternary environments [Internet]. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall; 1997. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_50505.pdf
160.
James A. Egypt and her vassals: the geopolitical dimension. In: Amarna diplomacy: the beginnings of international relations [Internet]. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press; 2000. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_50557.pdf
