1.
David Nicholas, Kramer Carol. Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Vol Cambridge world archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
2.
Flannery, Kent V. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009.
3.
Binford LR. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research. 1981;37(3):195-208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
4.
Clarke D. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47(185):6-18. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0003461X
5.
Flannery KV. Research strategy and formative Mesoamerica; a prayer for an endangered species. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009.
6.
Schiffer MB. Archaeological context and systemic context. American antiquity. 1972;37(2):156-165.
7.
Binford LB. A consideration of archaeological research design. American antiquity. 1964;29(4):425-441.
8.
Flannery KV. The golden marshalltown. American Anthropologist, New Series. 1982;84(2):265-278.
9.
Trigger BG. Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology. Antiquity. 1970;44(173):26-37. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00040953
10.
Schiffer MB. Formation processes. In: Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press; 1987:143-150-199-217.
11.
Wood W, Johnson D. A survey of disturbance processes in archaeological site formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1978;1.
12.
Binford LR. Dimensional analysis of behaviour and site structure: learning from Eskimo hunting stand. American Antiquity. 1978;43(3):330-361.
13.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2(2):117-163. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
14.
Andrefsky W. Raw material availability and organization of technology. American Antiquity. 1994;59(1):21-34.
15.
Binford LR. Forty-seven trips: A case study in the character of archaeological formation process. In: Working at Archaeology. Vol Studies in archeology. Academic Press; 1983:243-268.
16.
Binford LR. Organization and formation processes: looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research. 1979;35(3):255-273.
17.
Hardy-Smith T, Edwards PC. The garbage crisis in prehistory: artefact discard patterns at the Early Natufian site of Wadi Hammeh 27 and the origins of household refuse disposal strategies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2004;23(3):253-289. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2004.05.001
18.
Flannery KV, Winter M. Analyzing household activities. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009:34-47.
19.
LaMotta VM, Schiffer MB. Formation processes of house floor assemblages. In: The Archaeology of Household Activities. Routledge; 1999:19-29.
20.
de Loecker et al. D. A re-fitter’s paradise. In: Lithic Analysis at the Millennium. Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 2003:113-136.
21.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2(2):117-163. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
22.
Hill JD. Introduction. In: Ritual and Rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: A Study on the Formation of a Specific Archaeological Record. Vol BAR British series. Tempus Reparatum; 1995:1-11.
23.
Kent S. The archaeological visibility of storage: delineating storage from trash areas. American Antiquity. 1999;64(1):79-94.
24.
Pigeot N. Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian etiolles. Archaeological review from Cambridge. 1990;9(1):126-141. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2071af0-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
25.
Flannery, Kent V. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009.
26.
David N, Kramer C. Architecture: chapter 10. In: Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Vol Cambridge world archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2001:284-302.
27.
Parker Pearson M, Richards C. Ordering the world: perceptions of architecture, space and time. In: Architecture and Order: Approaches to Social Space. Vol Material cultures. Routledge; 1994:1-36.
28.
Wilk RR, Rathje WL. Household Archaeology. American Behavioral Scientist. 1982;25(6):617-639. doi:10.1177/000276482025006003
29.
Smith ME. Household possessions and wealth in agrarian states: Implications for archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1987;6(4):297-335. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(87)90004-3
30.
Steadman, Sharon R. Recent Research in the Archaeology of Architecture: Beyond the Foundations. Journal of Archaeological Research. 4(1):51-93.
31.
Flannery, Kent V. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009.
32.
Fairclough G. Meaningful constructions – spatial and functional analysis of medieval buildings. Antiquity. 1992;66(251):348-366. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00081461
33.
Foster SM. Analysis of spatial patterns in buildings (access analysis) as an insight into social structure: examples from the Scottish Atlantic Iron Age. Antiquity. 1989;63(238):40-50. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00075566
34.
Grahame M. Public and private in the Roman house. In: Domestic Space in the Roman World: Pompeii and Beyond. Vol Journal of Roman archaeology. JRA; 1997:137-164.
35.
Hill J. Broken K pueblo. In: New Perspectives in Archeology. Aldine; 1968:103-142. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=df51ecdd-029a-e711-80cb-005056af4099
36.
Kramer C. An archaeological view of a contemporary Kurdish village: domestic architecture, household size and wealth . In: Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology. Columbia University Press; 1979:139-163.
37.
Wright K. The social origins of cooking and dining in early villages of western Asia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 2000;66. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/25893/
38.
The Archaeology of the Dead : Lectures in Archaeothanatology - University College London.
39.
Michael Parker Perason. Form now to then: ethnoarchaeology and analogy. In: The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Sutton; 1999. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=364ba8be-9666-e911-80cd-005056af4099
40.
Lee, Frances, Roberts, Charlotte A., Bintliff, J. L. Burial Archaeology: Current Research Methods and Developments. Vol BAR British series. British Archaeological Reports; 1989.
41.
Scarre C. The meaning of death: funerary beliefs and the prehistorian. In: The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1994:75-82.
42.
Tainter, Joseph A. Mortuary Practices and the Study of Prehistoric Social Systems. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1:105-141.
43.
Ucko PJ. Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains. World Archaeology. 1969;1(2):262-280. doi:10.1080/00438243.1969.9979444
44.
Whitley J. Too many ancestors. Antiquity. 2002;76(291):119-126. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00089870
45.
MacDonald DH. Grief and Burial in the American Southwest: The Role of Evolutionary Theory in the Interpretation of Mortuary Remains. American Antiquity. 2001;66(04):704-714. doi:10.2307/2694183
46.
Parker Pearson M. Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnographical study. In: Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1982:99-113.
47.
Rega E. Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. In: Invisible People and Processes: Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology. Leicester University Press; 1996:229-247.
48.
Reynolds, Andrew. Anglo-Saxon Deviant Burial Customs. Vol Medieval history and archaeology. Oxford University Press; 2009.
49.
Shennan S. The social organization at Branč. Antiquity. 1975;49(196):279-288. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00070319
50.
Aufderheide, Arthur C., Rodríguez-Martín, Conrado, Langsjoen, Odin. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Paleopathology. Cambridge University Press; 1997.
51.
Brothwell, Don R., British Museum (Natural History). Digging up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment and Study of Human Skeletal Remains. 3rd ed. British Museum (Natural History); 1981.
52.
Aftandilian, David, Ubelaker, Douglas H., Haas, Jonathan, Buikstra, Jane E., Field Museum of Natural History. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains: Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History, Organized by Jonathan Haas. Vol Arkansas Archeological Survey research series. Arkansas Archeological Survey; 1994.
53.
Hillson, Simon. Dental Anthropology. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
54.
White, T. D., Folkens, Pieter A., Black, Michael Timothy. Human Osteology. 3rd ed. Academic; 2012.
55.
Cherry J. Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state. In: Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives. Basil Blackwell; 1987:146-172.
56.
David, Nicholas, Kramer, Carol. Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Vol Cambridge world archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
57.
Binford LR. Willow smoke and dog’s tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity. 1980;45(1):4-20.
58.
Flannery, Kent V. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009.
59.
Pires-Ferreira J. Shell and iron-ore mirror exchange in Formative Mesoamerica. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009:311-328.
60.
Roth A, ed. Social change in the Fourth Dynasty (Egypt): the spatial organization of pyramids, tombs and cemeteries. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt. 1993;30.
61.
Winter M. Distribution of obsidian among households in two Oaxacan villages. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009:306-311.
62.
Juggins S, Cameron N. Diatoms and archaeology. In: The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
63.
Moore, Peter D., Collinson, Margaret E., Webb, J. A. Pollen Analysis. 2nd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1991.
64.
Piperno, Dolores R. Phytoliths: A Comprehensive Guide for Archaeologists and Paleoecologists. AltaMira Press; 2006.
65.
Torrence, Robin, Barton, Huw. Ancient Starch Research. Left Coast Press; 2006.
66.
Bell M, Walker MJC. Evidence for environmental change. In: Late Quaternary Environmental Change: Physical and Human Perspectives. 2nd ed. Pearson; 2004:17-63.
67.
Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach. Cambridge University Press; 1982.
68.
O’Connor, Terri, Evans, John G. Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Methods. 2nd rev. ed. Sutton; 2005.
69.
Lowe JJ, Walker MJC. Biological evidence: chapter 4. In: Reconstructing Quaternary Environments. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall; 1997:162-236.
70.
Bradshaw R. Spatial scale in the pollen record. In: Modelling Ecological Change: Perspectives from Neoecology, Palaeoecology and Environmental Archaeology. Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 1991:41-52.
71.
Buckland PC. Viking settlement, climate and environmental change around the north Atlantic. In: Issues in Environmental Archaeology: Perspectives on Its Archaeological and Public Role. Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 1992:1-19.
72.
Edwards KJ. Spatial scale and palynology: a commentary on Bradshaw. In: Modelling Ecological Change: Perspectives from Neoecology, Palaeoecology and Environmental Archaeology. Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 1991:53-59.
73.
Hillman G. Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: the application of ethnographic models from Turkey. In: Plants and Ancient Man: Studies in Palaeoethnobotany : Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium of the International Work Group for Palaeoethnobotany, Groningen, 30 May-3 June 1983. A.A. Balkema; 1984:1-42.
74.
O’Connor T. 8th - 11th century economy and environment in York. In: Environment and Economy in Anglo-Saxon England: A Review of Recent Work on the Environmental Archaeology of Rural and Urban Anglo-Saxon Settlements in England : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Museum of London, 9-10 April, 1990. Vol CBA research report. Council for British Archaeology; 1994:136-147.
75.
Rackham DJ. Economy and environment in Saxon London. In: Environment and Economy in Anglo-Saxon England: A Review of Recent Work on the Environmental Archaeology of Rural and Urban Anglo-Saxon Settlements in England : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Museum of London, 9-10 April, 1990. Vol CBA research report. Council for British Archaeology; 1994.
76.
Smart TL, Hoffman ES. Environmental interpretation of archaeological charcoal. In: Current Paleoethnobotany: Analytical Methods and Cultural Interpretations of Archaeological Plant Remains. Vol Prehistoric archeology and ecology. University of Chicago Press; 1988:167-205.
77.
Tallis JH, Switsur VR. Forest and moorland in the south Pennine uplands in the mid-Flandrian period. 1: macrofossil evidence of the former forest cover. Journal of Ecology. 1983;71(2).
78.
Flannery KV. The village and its catchment area: introduction. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009:91-95.
79.
Flannery KV. Empirical determination of site catchments in Oaxaca and Tehuacan. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009:103-117.
80.
Rossman D. A site catchment analysis of San Lorenzo, Veracruz. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009:95-103.
81.
Zarky A. Statistical analysis of site catchments at Ocos, Guatemala. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Updated ed. Left Coast Press; 2009:117-128.
82.
Craddock, P. T. Early Metal Mining and Production. Edinburgh University Press; 1995.
83.
Henderson J. Metals. In: The Science and Archaeology of Materials: An Investigation of Inorganic Materials. Routledge; 2000:208-296.
84.
Rehren Th, Pernicka E. Coins, artefacts and isotopes - archaeometallurgy and archaeometry. Archaeometry. 2008;50(2). doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00389.x
85.
Renfrew, Colin, Bahn, Paul G. Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice. 5th ed. Thames & Hudson; 2008.
86.
Tylecote, R. F. The Early History of Metallurgy in Europe. Vol Longman archaeology series. Longman; 1987.
87.
Henderson J. Ceramics. In: The Science and Archaeology of Materials: An Investigation of Inorganic Materials. Routledge; 2000:109-207.
88.
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in Archaeology. Vol Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920066
89.
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press; 1987.
90.
Rice PM. Recent ceramic analysis: 1. function, style and origins. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1996;4(2):133-163.
91.
Rice PM. On the origins of pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 1999;6(1):1-54.
92.
Hamilton S. Between ritual and routine: interpreting prehistoric British pottery production and distribution. In: Prehistoric Britain: The Ceramic Basis. Vol Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. occasional publication. Oxbow; 2002. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47541.pdf
93.
Morris E. Staying alive: The function and use of prehistoric ceramics. In: Prehistoric Britain: The Ceramic Basis. Vol Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. occasional publication. Oxbow; 2002:54-61.
94.
Woodward A, Blinkthorn J. Size is important: Iron Age vessel capacities in central and southern England. In: Not so Much a Pot, More a Way of Life: Current Approaches to Artefact Analysis in Archaeology. Vol Oxbow monograph. Oxbow; 1997:21-35.
95.
Caple, Chris. Objects: Reluctant Witnesses to the Past. Routledge; 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203409060
96.
Costin C. Craft production. In: Handbook of Archaeological Methods. Altamira Press; 2005:1034-1107. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=364d506d-ef01-e811-80cd-005056af4099
97.
Forbes, R. J. Studies in Ancient Technology: Vol.8. Vol Studies in ancient technology. Brill; 1971.
98.
Hodges, Henry. Artifacts: An Introduction to Early Materials and Technology. Duckworth; 1989.
99.
Hurcombe, L. M. Archaeological Artefacts as Material Culture. Routledge; 2007.
100.
Shaw, Ian, Nicholson, Paul T. Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
101.
Singer, Charles. A History of Technology: Vol.1: From Earliest Times to Fall of Ancient Empires. Clarendon Press; 1954.
102.
The location of Alashiya: new evidence from petrographic investigation of Alashiyan tablets from el-Amarna and Ugarit. American Journal of Archaeology. 2003;107(2):233-255.
103.
Izre’el S. The Amarna letters from Canaan. In: Civilizations of the Ancient Near East. Hendrickson; 2000:2411-2420.
104.
Postgate N, Wang T, Wilkinson T. The evidence for early writing: utilitarian or ceremonial? Antiquity. 1995;69(264):459-480. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00081874
105.
Serpico M, White R. The botanical identity and transport of incense during the Egyptian New Kingdom. Antiquity. 2000;74(286):884-897. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00060531
106.
Andrén, Anders, Crozier, Alan. Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective. Vol Contributions to global historical archaeology. Plenum Press; 1998.
107.
Westbrook, Raymond, Cohen, Raymond. Amarna Diplomacy: The Beginnings of International Relations. Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press; 2000. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb30995.0001.001
108.
Goren, Yuval, Artzy, Michal, Finkelstein, Israel, Naʼaman, Nadav, Makhon le-arkheʼologyah ʻa. sh. Sonyah u-Marḳo Nadler. Inscribed in Clay: Provenance Study of the Amarna Tablets and Other Ancient Near Eastern Texts. Vol Monograph series / Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archeology. Emery and Claire Yass Publications in Archaeology; 2004.
109.
Little BarbaraJ. Text-aided archaeology. In: Text-Aided Archaeology. CRC Press; 1992:1-6.
110.
Moran, William L. The Amarna Letters. English-language ed. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1992.
111.
Rollston CA, Vaughn AG. Fakes, Forgeries and Biblical Scholarship. Near Eastern archaeology. 2005;68(1/2):61-72.
112.
Weinstein JM. The Egyptian Empire in Palestine: a reassessment. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 1981;(241):1-28.
113.
DeBoer W. Interaction, imitation and communication as expressed in style: the Ucayali experience. In: The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1989. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47546.pdf
114.
Conkey MW. Experimenting with style in archaeology: some historical and theoretical issues. In: The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1989.
115.
Hodder I. Re-opening Catalhoyuk. In: On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993-95. Vol BIAA monograph. McDonald Institute; 1996. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42228.pdf
116.
Hodder I. Peopling Catalhoyuk and its landscape. In: Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995-99 Seasons. Vol McDonald Institute monographs. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2005. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42229.pdf
117.
Hodder I. Trashing rubbish. In: Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük : By Members of the Çatalhöyük Team. Vol McDonald Institute monographs. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2000. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42230.pdf
118.
Gero A. Assessing social information in material objects: how well do lithics measure up? In: Time, Energy and Stone Tools. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1989. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42231.pdf
119.
Binford LR. Interassemblage variability - the Mousterian and the functional argument. In: The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. Duckworth; 1973. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42232.pdf
120.
Baysal A, Wright K. Cooking, crafts and curation: the ground stone artefacts from Catalhoyuk, 1995-1999. In: Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995-99 Seasons. Vol McDonald Institute monographs. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2005. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42233.pdf
121.
Wiessner P. Style and changing relations between the individual and society. In: The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. Vol One world archaeology. Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic; 1989. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42234.pdf
122.
L F. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. In: The Archaeology of Inequality. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1991. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42235.pdf
123.
Hill JD. Introduction. In: Ritual and Rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: A Study on the Formation of a Specific Archaeological Record. Vol BAR British series. Tempus Reparatum; 1995. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42258.pdf
124.
Price M. All in the family: the impact of gender and family constructs on the study of prehistoric settlement. In: Making Places in the Prehistoric World: Themes in Settlement Archaeology. Routledge; 2003. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42260.pdf
125.
Ray L. The organization of space in Pompeii. In: Urban Society in Roman Italy. UCL Press; 1995. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42261.pdf
126.
Sanders D. Behavioural conventions and archaeology: methods for the analysis of ancient architecture. In: Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space: An Interdisciplinary Cross-Cultural Study. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1990. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42262.pdf
127.
Ashmore W, Knapp AB. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. In: Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers; 1999. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42263.pdf
128.
Isaac G. Bones in contention: competing explanations for the juxtaposition of early Pleistocene artifacts and faunal remains. In: Animals and Archaeology: 1: Hunters and Their Prey. Vol BAR international series. B.A.R.; 1984. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42266.pdf
129.
Braun D. Pots as tools. In: Archaeological Hammers and Theories. Vol Studies in archaeology. Academic Press; 1983.
130.
O’Connell JF. Ethnoarchaeology needs a general theory of behavior. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1995;3(3):205-255. doi:10.1007/BF02231450
131.
Longacre WA. Some aspects of prehistoric society in east-central Arizona. In: New%20perspectives%20in%20archeology. Aldine%20Publishing%20Company%2C; 1968. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47544.pdf
132.
Orton C. Assemblages and sites. In: Pottery in Archaeology. Vol Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1993. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511920066
133.
Debénath A, Dibble HL. Introduction. In: Handbook of Paleolithic Typology. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania; 1993.
134.
Hardy K. Where would we be without string? Ethnographic evidence for the use, manufacture and role of string in the Upper Palaeolithic. In: Plant Processing Form a Prehistoric and Ethnographic Perspective: Préhistoire et Ethnographie Du Travail Des Plantes : Proceedings of a Workshop at Ghent University (Belgium) November 28, 2006. Vol BAR international series. John & Erica Hedges; 2007. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47552.pdf
135.
Kramer C. Spatial organization in contemporary southwest Asian villages and archaeological sampling. In: The Hilly Flanks and beyond: Essays on the Prehistory of Southwestern Asia Presented to Robert J. Braidwood, November L5, L982. Vol Studies in ancient oriental civilization. Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago; 1983. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47553.pdf
136.
Jeanne Sept. Archaeological Evidence and Ecological Perspectives for Reconstructing Early Hominid Subsistence Behavior. Archaeological Method and Theory. 1992;4:1-56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170220
137.
Storey G. Estimating the population of ancient Roman cities. In: Integrating Archaeological Demography: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Prehistoric Population. Vol Occasional paper / Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Center for Archaeological Investigations. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale; 1997. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47556.pdf
138.
Brown JA. On the structure of artifact typologies. In: Essays on Archeological Typology. Vol Kampsville seminars in archeology. Center for American Archeology; 1982. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47557.pdf
139.
Hill J, Evans R. A model for classification and typology. In: Models in Archaeology. Methuen; 1972. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47558.pdf
140.
Longacre WA. Archaeology as anthropology: a case study. In: Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions. Southern Illinois University Press; 1972. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47559.pdf
141.
Hodder I. The decoration of containers: an ethnographic and historical study. In: Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. University of Arizona Press; 1991. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47560.pdf
142.
Folorunso CA. Gender and archaeological site formation: ethnoarchaeological studies in parts of Nigeria. In: Archaeology and Women: Ancient & Modern Issues. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press; 2007. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47580.pdf
143.
DeLoecker et al D. A re-fitter’s paradise. In: Lithic Analysis at the Millennium. Institute of Archaeology, University College London; 2003. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47582.pdf
144.
DeBoer W, Lathrap D. The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics. In: Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology. Columbia University Press; 1979. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47583.pdf
145.
Margaret C. Nelson. The Study of Technological Organization. Archaeological Method and Theory. 1991;3:57-100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170213
146.
Hodder I. Crises in global archaeology. In: The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell; 1999. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47585.pdf
147.
Whittaker J. Flintknapping: basic principles. In: Flintknapping: Making and Understanding Stone Tools. University of Texas Press; 1994. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47586.pdf
148.
Banning E. Research design and sampling. In: The Archaeologist’s Laboratory: The Analysis of Archaeological Data. Vol Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. London; 2000.
149.
Dibble HL. Raw material availability, intensity of utilization and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. In: The Middle Paleolithic Site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France). University Museum, University of Pennsylvania; 1995.
150.
Hodder I. Developing a reflexive method in archaeology. In: Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük : By Members of the Çatalhöyük Team. Vol McDonald Institute monographs. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2000.
151.
Hodder I. The integration of methods: introduction. In: Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük : By Members of the Çatalhöyük Team. Vol McDonald Institute monographs. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2000.
152.
Rapp GR, Hill CL. Theoretical and historical overview. In: Geoarchaeology: The Earth-Science Approach to Archaeological Interpretation. 2nd ed. Yale University Press; 2006. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47601.pdf
153.
Binford, Lewis Roberts, Quimby, George I. An Archaeological Perspective. Vol Studies in archeology. Seminar Press; 1972.
154.
Clark JE. Politics, prismatic blades and Mesoamerican civilization. In: The Organization of Core Technology. Vol Westview special studies in archaeological research. Westview Press; 1987. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_47725.pdf
155.
Quine TA. Soil analysis and archaeological site formation studies. In: Archaeological Sediments and Soils: Analysis, Interpretation and Management. Institute of Archaeology, University College, London; 1995. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49623.pdf
156.
Wheeler REM. Introductory: chapter 1. In: Archaeology from the Earth. Vol Pelican books. Penguin; 1956. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49627.pdf
157.
Thomson R. Leather working processes. In: Leather and Fur: Aspects of Early Medieval Trade and Technology. Archetype Pub. for the Archaeological Leather Group; 1998. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49628.pdf
158.
Angus A. An introduction to the types of tannage used on ethnographic leather. In: The Conservation of Fur, Feather and Skin: Seminar Organised by the Conservators of Ethnographic Artefacts at the Museum of London on 11 December 2000. Vol Conservators of Ethnographic Artefacts. Archetype; 2002. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_49629.pdf
159.
Lowe JJ, Walker MJC. Biological evidence. In: Reconstructing Quaternary Environments. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall; 1997. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_50505.pdf
160.
James A. Egypt and her vassals: the geopolitical dimension. In: Amarna Diplomacy: The Beginnings of International Relations. Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press; 2000. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_50557.pdf
