1.
Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T, eds. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley; 2017. doi:10.1002/9781405177245
2.
Wolff J. An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Rev. ed. Oxford University Press; 2006.
3.
Simmons AJ. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press; 1979.
4.
Horton J. Political Obligation. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1992.
5.
Richard B. Friedman. On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy. In: Political Obligation. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1992.
6.
Wolff RP. The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy. In: In Defense of Anarchism. Vol Harper essays in philosophy. Harper & Row; 1976:3-19. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3ae4f684-c1ad-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
7.
Jones P. Rights. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1994.
8.
Harry G. Frankfurt. The Anarchism of Robert Paul Wolff. Political Theory. 1973;1(4):405-414. http://www.jstor.org/stable/191060
9.
Green L. The Authority of the State. Clarendon; 1988.
10.
Richard Tuck. Why is Authority Such a Problem? In: Philosophy, Politics and Society: 4th Series. Blackwell; 1972.
11.
Wolff J. Anarchism and Skepticism. In: For and against the State: New Philosophical Readings. Vol Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield; 1996:99-118. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=512effac-e2b0-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
12.
Simmons J. Philosophical Anarchism. In: For and against the State: New Philosophical Readings. Vol Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield; 1996:19-39. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5196bdef-e0b0-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
13.
A. John Simmons. Justification and Legitimacy*. Ethics. 1999;109(4):739-771. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233944
14.
Richard Dworkin. The Puzzle of Legitimacy’. In: Law’s Empire. Hart; 1998.
15.
Ripstein A. Authority and Coercion. Philosophy Public Affairs. 2004;32(1):2-35. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00003.x
16.
Horton J. Political Obligation. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1992.
17.
Simmons AJ. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press; 1979.
18.
Miller D. Anarchism. Vol Modern ideologies. Dent; 1984.
19.
Rattner A. Is there a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law? An Empirical Examination of the Question in Israeli Society. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. 1996;4(4):348-360. doi:10.1163/157181796X00195
20.
Pitkin H. Obligation and Consent--I. The American Political Science Review. 1965;59(4). doi:10.2307/1953218
21.
Joseph Raz. Authority and Justification. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1985;14(1):3-29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265235
22.
Darwall S. Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence. 2011;2(1):103-119. doi:10.5235/204033211796290263
23.
Darwall S. Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence. 2011;2(1):103-119. doi:10.5235/204033211796290263
24.
John Simmons. Political Consent. In: The Social Contract Theorists: Critical Essays on Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Vol Critical essays on the classics. Rowman & Littlefield; 1999.
25.
Simmons AJ. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press; 1979.
26.
A. John Simmons. Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1976;5(3):274-291. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2264884
27.
Horton J. Political Obligation. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1992.
28.
Beran H. The Consent Theory of Political Obligation. Vol Croom Helm international series in social and political thought. Croom Helm
29.
Margaret Gilbert. Reconsidering the ‘Actual Contract’ and Theory of Political Obligation*. Ethics. 1999;109(2):236-260. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233895
30.
Pateman C. The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critique of Liberal Theory. Polity in association with Blackwell; 1985.
31.
Locke J, Locke J, Gough JW. The Second Treatise of Civil Government: And, A Letter Concerning Toleration. Basil Blackwell; 1948.
32.
Hume D, MacIntyre AC. Hume’s Ethical Writings: Selections from David Hume. University of Notre Dame Press; 1979.
33.
Patrick Durning. Joseph Raz and the Instrumental Justification of a Duty to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy. 2003;22(6):597-620. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3505046
34.
George Klosko. Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1987;16(3):241-259. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265266
35.
Klosko G. Political Obligations. Oxford University Press; 2005. doi:10.1093/0199256209.001.0001
36.
Dagger R. Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation. Political Studies. 2000;48(1):104-117. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00253
37.
George Klosko. Multiple Principles of Political Obligation. Political Theory. 2004;32(6):801-824. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4148146
38.
Simmons AJ. Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
39.
A. John Simmons. Associative Political Obligations. Ethics. 1996;106(2):247-273. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382059
40.
Klosko G. The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation. Vol Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy. New ed. Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.
41.
Richard J. Arneson. The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems. Ethics. 1982;92(4):616-633. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2380394
42.
John Rawls. Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play. In: Collected Papers. Harvard University Press; 1999.
43.
Dworkin R. Law’s Empire. Vol Fontana master guides. Fontana; 1986.
44.
McDermott D. Fair-Play Obligations. Political Studies. 2004;52(2):216-232. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00476.x
45.
Nozick R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Blackwell; 1974.
46.
Horton J. In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One. Political Studies. 2006;54(3):427-443. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00621.x
47.
Horton J. In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two. Political Studies. 2007;55(1):1-19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00642.x
48.
Tamir Y. Liberal Nationalism. Vol Studies in moral, political, and legal philosophy. Princeton University Press; 1993.
49.
Andrew Mason. Special Obligations to Compatriots. Ethics. 1997;107(3):427-447. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382324
50.
Christopher Heath Wellman. Associative Allegiances and Political Obligations. Social Theory and Practice. 1997;23(2):181-204. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23559181
51.
Jo Wolff. Political Obligation: A Pluralistic Approach. In: Pluralism: The Philosophy and Politics of Diversity. Routledge; 2000. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7365ad01-9bae-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
52.
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1999.
53.
LYONS D. Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience. Philosophy Public Affairs. 1998;27(1):31-49. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00058.x
54.
Brownlee K. Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica. 2004;10(4):337-351. doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6
55.
Ronald Dworkin. Civil Disobedience. In: Taking Rights Seriously. Duckworth; 1977.
56.
Brownlee K. Conscience and Conviction. Oxford University Press; 2012. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001
57.
Haksar V. Rawls and Gandhi on civil disobedience. Inquiry. 1976;19(1-4):151-192. doi:10.1080/00201747608601790
58.
Simmons AJ. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press; 1979.
59.
David Lefkowitz. On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience*. Ethics. 2007;117(2):202-233. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/510694
60.
Singer P. Democracy and Disobedience. Clarendon Press; 1973.
61.
Singer P. Democracy and Disobedience. Clarendon Press; 1973.
62.
Adam J, Plato. Platonis Crito. Vol Pitt press series. University press; 1903.
63.
Raz J. The Authority of lawEssays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press; 1979. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001
64.
Walzer M. Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship. Harvard University Press; 1970.
65.
Sabl A. Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2001;9(3):331-349. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00129
66.
David Enoch. Some Arguments against Conscientious Objection and Civil Disobedience Refuted. Israel Law Review. 2002;36:227-253. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/israel36&id=629&collection=journals&index=journals/israel
67.
Moore M, ed. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press; 1998. doi:10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
68.
BUCHANAN A. Theories of Secession. Philosophy Public Affairs. 1997;26(1):31-61. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00049.x
69.
Daniel Philpott. In Defense of Self-Determination. Ethics. 1995;105(2):352-385. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382349
70.
David Miller. Secession and the Principle of Nationality. In: Moore M, ed. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press; 1998. doi:10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
71.
Moore M, ed. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press; 1998. doi:10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
72.
Margaret Moore. The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. 13(2):225-250. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/caljp13&id=227&collection=journals&index=journals/caljp
73.
David Gauthier. Breaking up: An Essay on Secession. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 1994;24(3):357-371. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40231872
74.
Brilmayer, Lea. Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation. Yale Journal of International Law. 1991;16(1):177-202. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil16&id=183&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil
75.
Christopher H. Wellman. A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1995;24(2):142-171. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265391
76.
Wellman CH. A Theory of Secession: The Case for Political Self-Determination. Cambridge University Press; 2005. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/theory-of-secession/79CF1B218C8B49C0EBC9E1493DB75ED7
77.
Buchanan AE. Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Westview Press; 1991.
78.
Buchanan A. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. Oxford University Press; 2003. doi:10.1093/0198295359.001.0001
79.
Macedo S, Buchanan AE. Secession and Self-Determination. Vol Nomos. New York University Press; 2003.
80.
Alan Patten. Democratic Secession from a Multinational State*. Ethics. 2002;112(3):558-586. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/338778
81.
LIST C. The Logical Space of Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2011;39(3):262-297. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01206.x
82.
Gutmann A. Democracy. In: Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T, eds A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley; 2017. doi:10.1002/9781405177245
83.
Sen AK. Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy. 1999;10(3):3-17. doi:10.1353/jod.1999.0055
84.
Weale A. Democracy. Vol Issues in political theory. Palgrave; 1999.
85.
Estlund DM. Democracy. Vol Blackwell readings in philosophy. Blackwell Publishers; 2001.
86.
Democracy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democracy/
87.
Barry B. Is Democracy Special? In: Democracy and Power: Essays in Political Theory I. Clarendon Press; 1991:24-60. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b00a66d1-c0ad-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
88.
Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. G. Allen & Unwin Ltd; 1943.
89.
Quinton A. Political Philosophy. Vol Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford University Press; 1967.
90.
Dahl RA. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press; 1989. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
91.
Dworkin R. Justice for Hedgehogs. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2011. https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=364811&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
92.
Christiano T. The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Vol Focus (Southern Regional Education Board). Westview Press; 1996.
93.
Gordon Graham. What is Special About Democracy? Mind. 1983;92(365):94-102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2253932
94.
Dahl RA. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press; 1989. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
95.
Richard Arneson. Democracy is not Intrinsically Just. In: Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge University Press; 2004.
96.
Griffin CG. Democracy as a Non-Instrumentally Just Procedure. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2003;11(1):111-121. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00169
97.
Parijs P. Justice and Democracy: Are they Incompatible?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 1996;4(2):101-117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00044.x
98.
Arneson RJ. Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2003;11(1):122-132. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00170
99.
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004;12(3):266-290. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x
100.
Cohen J. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. Basil Blackwell; 1989:17-34. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=83a22d24-c1ad-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
101.
Review by: Joshua Cohen. Reflections on Rousseau: Autonomy and Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1986;15(3):275-297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265213
102.
Valentini L. Justice, Disagreement and Democracy. British Journal of Political Science. 2013;43(01):177-199. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000294
103.
Ross M. Is Democracy Good for the Poor? American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50(4):860-874. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00220.x
104.
Estlund DM. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton University Press; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781400831548
105.
Walzer M. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books; 1983.
106.
Young IM. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press; 2002. doi:10.1093/0198297556.001.0001
107.
Beitz CR. Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton University Press; 1989.
108.
Jeremy Waldron. The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle’s Politics. Political Theory. 1995;23(4):563-584. http://www.jstor.org/stable/191901
109.
Jeremy Waldron. The Core of the Case against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal. 2006;115(6):1346-1406. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/20455656?origin=crossref
110.
Risse M. Arguing for Majority Rule*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004;12(1):41-64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00190.x
111.
Brettschneider C. Balancing Procedures and Outcomes Within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review. Political Studies. 2005;53(2):423-441. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00536.x
112.
Phillips A. Democracy and Difference: Some Problems for Feminist Theory. In: The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford University Press; 1995:288-299. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9bd3e66f-bbb0-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
113.
Allen Buchanan. Political Legitimacy and Democracy*. Ethics. 2002;112(4):689-719. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/340313
114.
Christiano T. The Constitution of Equality. Oxford University Press; 2008. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001
115.
Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule*. Ethics. 2010;121(1):148-177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474
116.
Harrison R. Democracy. Routledge; 2002. doi:10.4324/9780203005545
117.
Weale A. Democracy. Vol Issues in political theory. Palgrave; 1999.
118.
Steven Macedo. Against Majoritarianism: Democratic Values and Institutional Design. Boston University Law Review. 90(2):1029-1042. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1029&handle=hein.journals%2Fbulr90&collection=journals
119.
Waldron J. Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press; 1999. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001
120.
Noveck, Scott M. Is Judicial Review Compatible with Democracy? Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal. 2007;6(2):401-430. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cardplp6&id=407&collection=journals&index=journals/cardplp
121.
Dworkin R. Law’s Empire. Vol Fontana master guides. Fontana; 1986.
122.
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004;12(3):266-290. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x
123.
LIST C, KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI M. Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2010;38(1):76-110. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01174.x
124.
Miller D. Democracy’s Domain. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2009;37(3):201-228. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x
125.
Goodin RE. Global democracy: in the beginning. International Theory. 2010;2(02):175-209. doi:10.1017/S1752971910000060
126.
Koenig-Archibugi M. Is global democracy possible? European Journal of International Relations. 2011;17(3):519-542. doi:10.1177/1354066110366056
127.
Miller D. Against Global Democracy. In: After the Nation?: Critical Reflections on Nationalism and Post-Nationalism. Vol International political theory series. Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:141-160. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=dd665848-83ae-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
128.
Näsström S. The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies. 2011;59(1):116-134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x
129.
GOODIN RE. Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2007;35(1):40-68. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x
130.
Macdonald T. Global Stakeholder Democracy. Oxford University Press; 2008. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235001.001.0001
131.
Thompson DF. Democratic Theory and Global Society. Journal of Political Philosophy. 1999;7(2):111-125. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00069
132.
Gould CC. Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press; 2004. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511617096
133.
David Held. Democracy and the International System. In: Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Polity Press; 1995.
134.
Robert Dahl. Can International Organisations be Democratic? In: Democracy’s Edges. Vol Contemporary political theory. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
135.
Cabrera, Luis. The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy. Ethics and International Affairs. 1 AD;21(2):219-238. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs/article/inconveniences-of-transnational-democracy/96027C6EE6E68D572DE43E93F9E2C8A8
