1.
Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T, editors. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy [Internet]. Wiley; 2017. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781405177245
2.
Wolff J. An introduction to political philosophy. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
3.
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1979.
4.
Horton J. Political obligation. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1992.
5.
Richard B. Friedman. On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy. Political obligation. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1992.
6.
Wolff RP. The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy. In defense of anarchism [Internet]. New York: Harper & Row; 1976. p. 3–19. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3ae4f684-c1ad-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
7.
Jones P. Rights. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1994.
8.
Harry G. Frankfurt. The Anarchism of Robert Paul Wolff. Political Theory [Internet]. Sage Publications, Inc.; 1973;1(4):405–414. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191060
9.
Green L. The authority of the state. Oxford: Clarendon; 1988.
10.
Richard Tuck. Why is Authority Such a Problem? Philosophy, politics and society: 4th series. Oxford: Blackwell; 1972.
11.
Wolff J. Anarchism and Skepticism. For and against the state: new philosophical readings [Internet]. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 1996. p. 99–118. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=512effac-e2b0-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
12.
Simmons J. Philosophical Anarchism. For and against the state: new philosophical readings [Internet]. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 1996. p. 19–39. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5196bdef-e0b0-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
13.
A. John Simmons. Justification and Legitimacy*. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1999;109(4):739–771. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233944
14.
Richard Dworkin. The Puzzle of Legitimacy’. Law’s empire. Oxford: Hart; 1998.
15.
Ripstein A. Authority and Coercion. Philosophy Public Affairs. 2004 Jan;32(1):2–35.
16.
Horton J. Political obligation. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1992.
17.
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1979.
18.
Miller D. Anarchism. London: Dent; 1984.
19.
Rattner A. Is there a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law? An Empirical Examination of the Question in Israeli Society. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. 1996 Jan 1;4(4):348–360.
20.
Pitkin H. Obligation and Consent--I. The American Political Science Review. 1965 Dec;59(4).
21.
Joseph Raz. Authority and Justification. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. Wiley; 1985;14(1):3–29. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265235
22.
Darwall S. Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence. 2011 June 1;2(1):103–119.
23.
Darwall S. Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence. 2011 June 1;2(1):103–119.
24.
John Simmons. Political Consent. The social contract theorists: critical essays on Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 1999.
25.
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1979.
26.
A. John Simmons. Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. Wiley; 1976;5(3):274–291. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2264884
27.
Horton J. Political obligation. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1992.
28.
Beran H. The consent theory of political obligation. London: Croom Helm;
29.
Margaret Gilbert. Reconsidering the ‘Actual Contract’ and Theory of Political Obligation*. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1999;109(2):236–260. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233895
30.
Pateman C. The problem of political obligation: a critique of liberal theory. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell; 1985.
31.
Locke J, Locke J, Gough JW. The second treatise of civil government: and, A letter concerning toleration. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1948.
32.
Hume D, MacIntyre AC. Hume’s ethical writings: selections from David Hume. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press; 1979.
33.
Patrick Durning. Joseph Raz and the Instrumental Justification of a Duty to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy [Internet]. Springer; 2003;22(6):597–620. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3505046
34.
George Klosko. Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. Wiley; 1987;16(3):241–259. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265266
35.
Klosko G. Political Obligations [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199256209.001.0001/acprof-9780199256204
36.
Dagger R. Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation. Political Studies. 2000 Mar;48(1):104–117.
37.
George Klosko. Multiple Principles of Political Obligation. Political Theory [Internet]. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2004;32(6):801–824. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4148146
38.
Simmons AJ. Justification and legitimacy: essays on rights and obligations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
39.
A. John Simmons. Associative Political Obligations. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1996;106(2):247–273. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382059
40.
Klosko G. The principle of fairness and political obligation. New ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.
41.
Richard J. Arneson. The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1982;92(4):616–633. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2380394
42.
John Rawls. Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play. Collected papers. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1999.
43.
Dworkin R. Law’s empire. London: Fontana; 1986.
44.
McDermott D. Fair-Play Obligations. Political Studies. 2004 June;52(2):216–232.
45.
Nozick R. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: Blackwell; 1974.
46.
Horton J. In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One. Political Studies. 2006 Oct;54(3):427–443.
47.
Horton J. In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two. Political Studies. 2007 Mar;55(1):1–19.
48.
Tamir Y. Liberal nationalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1993.
49.
Andrew Mason. Special Obligations to Compatriots. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1997;107(3):427–447. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382324
50.
Christopher Heath Wellman. Associative Allegiances and Political Obligations. Social Theory and Practice [Internet]. Florida State University Department of Philosophy; 1997;23(2):181–204. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23559181
51.
Jo Wolff. Political Obligation: A Pluralistic Approach. Pluralism: the philosophy and politics of diversity [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2000. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7365ad01-9bae-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
52.
Rawls J. A theory of justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1999.
53.
LYONS D. Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience. Philosophy Public Affairs. 1998 Jan;27(1):31–49.
54.
Brownlee K. Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica. 2004 Dec;10(4):337–351.
55.
Ronald Dworkin. Civil Disobedience. Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth; 1977.
56.
Brownlee K. Conscience and Conviction [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001/acprof-9780199592944
57.
Haksar V. Rawls and Gandhi on civil disobedience. Inquiry. 1976 Jan;19(1–4):151–192.
58.
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1979.
59.
David Lefkowitz. On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience*. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 2007;117(2):202–233. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/510694
60.
Singer P. Democracy and disobedience. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1973.
61.
Singer P. Democracy and disobedience. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1973.
62.
Adam J, Plato. Platonis Crito. Cambridge: University press; 1903.
63.
Raz J. The authority of lawEssays on law and morality [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1979. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001/acprof-9780198253457
64.
Walzer M. Obligations: essays on disobedience, war, and citizenship. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press; 1970.
65.
Sabl A. Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2001 Sept;9(3):331–349.
66.
David Enoch. Some Arguments against Conscientious Objection and Civil Disobedience Refuted. Israel Law Review [Internet]. 2002;36:227–253. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/israel36&id=629&collection=journals&index=journals/israel
67.
Moore M, editor. National Self-Determination and Secession [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1998. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001/acprof-9780198293842
68.
BUCHANAN A. Theories of Secession. Philosophy Public Affairs. 1997 Jan;26(1):31–61.
69.
Daniel Philpott. In Defense of Self-Determination. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1995;105(2):352–385. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382349
70.
David Miller. Secession and the Principle of Nationality. In: Moore M, editor. National Self-Determination and Secession [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1998. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001/acprof-9780198293842
71.
Moore M, editor. National Self-Determination and Secession [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1998. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001/acprof-9780198293842
72.
Margaret Moore. The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence [Internet]. 13(2):225–250. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/caljp13&id=227&collection=journals&index=journals/caljp
73.
David Gauthier. Breaking up: An Essay on Secession. Canadian Journal of Philosophy [Internet]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd.; 1994;24(3):357–371. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40231872
74.
Brilmayer, Lea. Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation. Yale Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1991;16(1):177–202. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil16&id=183&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil
75.
Christopher H. Wellman. A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. Wiley; 1995;24(2):142–171. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265391
76.
Wellman CH. A theory of secession: the case for political self-determination [Internet]. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/theory-of-secession/79CF1B218C8B49C0EBC9E1493DB75ED7
77.
Buchanan AE. Secession: the morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Boulder: Westview Press; 1991.
78.
Buchanan A. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2003. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198295359.001.0001/acprof-9780198295358
79.
Macedo S, Buchanan AE. Secession and self-determination. New York, London: New York University Press; 2003.
80.
Alan Patten. Democratic Secession from a Multinational State*. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 2002;112(3):558–586. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/338778
81.
LIST C. The Logical Space of Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2011 June;39(3):262–297.
82.
Gutmann A. Democracy. In: Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T, editors. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy [Internet]. Wiley; 2017. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781405177245
83.
Sen AK. Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy. 1999;10(3):3–17.
84.
Weale A. Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 1999.
85.
Estlund DM. Democracy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers; 2001.
86.
Democracy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) [Internet]. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democracy/
87.
Barry B. Is Democracy Special? Democracy and power: essays in political theory I [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1991. p. 24–60. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b00a66d1-c0ad-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
88.
Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: G. Allen & Unwin Ltd; 1943.
89.
Quinton A. Political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1967.
90.
Dahl RA. Democracy and its critics [Internet]. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1989. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
91.
Dworkin R. Justice for hedgehogs [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2011. Available from: https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=364811&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
92.
Christiano T. The rule of the many: fundamental issues in democratic theory. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press; 1996.
93.
Gordon Graham. What is Special About Democracy? Mind [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1983;92(365):94–102. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2253932
94.
Dahl RA. Democracy and its critics [Internet]. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1989. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
95.
Richard Arneson. Democracy is not Intrinsically Just. Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
96.
Griffin CG. Democracy as a Non-Instrumentally Just Procedure. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2003 Mar;11(1):111–121.
97.
Parijs P. Justice and Democracy: Are they Incompatible?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 1996 June;4(2):101–117.
98.
Arneson RJ. Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2003 Mar;11(1):122–132.
99.
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004 Sept;12(3):266–290.
100.
Cohen J. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. The Good polity: normative analysis of the state [Internet]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1989. p. 17–34. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=83a22d24-c1ad-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
101.
Review by: Joshua Cohen. Reflections on Rousseau: Autonomy and Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. Wiley; 1986;15(3):275–297. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265213
102.
Valentini L. Justice, Disagreement and Democracy. British Journal of Political Science. 2013 Jan;43(01):177–199.
103.
Ross M. Is Democracy Good for the Poor? American Journal of Political Science. 2006 Oct;50(4):860–874.
104.
Estlund DM. Democratic authority: a philosophical framework [Internet]. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781400831548
105.
Walzer M. Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books; 1983.
106.
Young IM. Inclusion and Democracy [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198297556.001.0001/acprof-9780198297550
107.
Beitz CR. Political equality: an essay in democratic theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1989.
108.
Jeremy Waldron. The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle’s Politics. Political Theory [Internet]. Sage Publications, Inc.; 1995;23(4):563–584. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191901
109.
Jeremy Waldron. The Core of the Case against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal [Internet]. The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.; 2006;115(6):1346–1406. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/20455656?origin=crossref
110.
Risse M. Arguing for Majority Rule*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004 Mar;12(1):41–64.
111.
Brettschneider C. Balancing Procedures and Outcomes Within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review. Political Studies. 2005 June;53(2):423–441.
112.
Phillips A. Democracy and Difference: Some Problems for Feminist Theory. The rights of minority cultures [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 288–299. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9bd3e66f-bbb0-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
113.
Allen Buchanan. Political Legitimacy and Democracy*. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 2002;112(4):689–719. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/340313
114.
Christiano T. The Constitution of Equality [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001/acprof-9780198297475
115.
Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule*. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 2010;121(1):148–177. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474
116.
Harrison R. Democracy [Internet]. Routledge; 2002. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134790692
117.
Weale A. Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 1999.
118.
Steven Macedo. Against Majoritarianism: Democratic Values and Institutional Design. Boston University Law Review [Internet]. 90(2):1029–1042. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1029&handle=hein.journals%2Fbulr90&collection=journals
119.
Waldron J. Law and Disagreement [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1999. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001/acprof-9780198262138
120.
Noveck, Scott M. Is Judicial Review Compatible with Democracy? Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal [Internet]. 2007;6(2):401–430. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cardplp6&id=407&collection=journals&index=journals/cardplp
121.
Dworkin R. Law’s empire. London: Fontana; 1986.
122.
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004 Sept;12(3):266–290.
123.
LIST C, KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI M. Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2010 Jan;38(1):76–110.
124.
Miller D. Democracy’s Domain. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2009 June;37(3):201–228.
125.
Goodin RE. Global democracy: in the beginning. International Theory. 2010 July;2(02):175–209.
126.
Koenig-Archibugi M. Is global democracy possible? European Journal of International Relations. 2011 Sept 1;17(3):519–542.
127.
Miller D. Against Global Democracy. After the nation?: critical reflections on nationalism and post-nationalism [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. p. 141–160. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=dd665848-83ae-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
128.
Näsström S. The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies. 2011 Mar;59(1):116–134.
129.
GOODIN RE. Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2007 Jan;35(1):40–68.
130.
Macdonald T. Global Stakeholder Democracy [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235001.001.0001/acprof-9780199235001
131.
Thompson DF. Democratic Theory and Global Society. Journal of Political Philosophy. 1999 June;7(2):111–125.
132.
Gould CC. Globalizing democracy and human rights [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511617096
133.
David Held. Democracy and the International System. Cosmopolitan democracy: an agenda for a new world order. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1995.
134.
Robert Dahl. Can International Organisations be Democratic? Democracy’s edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
135.
Cabrera, Luis. The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy. Ethics and International Affairs [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 1 AD;21(2):219–238. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs/article/inconveniences-of-transnational-democracy/96027C6EE6E68D572DE43E93F9E2C8A8
