[1]
R. E. Goodin, P. Pettit, and T. Pogge, Eds, A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley, 2017. doi: 10.1002/9781405177245. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781405177245
[2]
J. Wolff, An introduction to political philosophy, Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[3]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[4]
J. Horton, Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[5]
Richard B. Friedman, ‘On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy’, in Political obligation, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[6]
R. P. Wolff, ‘The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy’, in In defense of anarchism, New York: Harper & Row, 1976, pp. 3–19. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3ae4f684-c1ad-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
[7]
P. Jones, Rights, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994.
[8]
Harry G. Frankfurt, ‘The Anarchism of Robert Paul Wolff’, Political Theory, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 405–414, 1973, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191060
[9]
L. Green, The authority of the state. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.
[10]
Richard Tuck, ‘Why is Authority Such a Problem?’, in Philosophy, politics and society: 4th series, Oxford: Blackwell, 1972.
[11]
J. Wolff, ‘Anarchism and Skepticism’, in For and against the state: new philosophical readings, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996, pp. 99–118. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=512effac-e2b0-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
[12]
J. Simmons, ‘Philosophical Anarchism’, in For and against the state: new philosophical readings, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996, pp. 19–39. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5196bdef-e0b0-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
[13]
A. John Simmons, ‘Justification and Legitimacy*’, Ethics, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 739–771, 1999, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233944
[14]
Richard Dworkin, ‘The Puzzle of Legitimacy’’, in Law’s empire, Oxford: Hart, 1998.
[15]
A. Ripstein, ‘Authority and Coercion’, Philosophy Public Affairs, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 2–35, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00003.x
[16]
J. Horton, Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[17]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[18]
D. Miller, Anarchism, vol. Modern ideologies. London: Dent, 1984.
[19]
A. Rattner, ‘Is there a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law? An Empirical Examination of the Question in Israeli Society’, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 348–360, Jan. 1996, doi: 10.1163/157181796X00195
[20]
H. Pitkin, ‘Obligation and Consent--I’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 59, no. 4, Dec. 1965, doi: 10.2307/1953218
[21]
Joseph Raz, ‘Authority and Justification’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–29, 1985, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265235
[22]
S. Darwall, ‘Authority, Accountability, and Preemption’, Jurisprudence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 103–119, June 2011, doi: 10.5235/204033211796290263
[23]
S. Darwall, ‘Authority, Accountability, and Preemption’, Jurisprudence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 103–119, June 2011, doi: 10.5235/204033211796290263
[24]
John Simmons, ‘Political Consent’, in The social contract theorists: critical essays on Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
[25]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[26]
A. John Simmons, ‘Tacit Consent and Political Obligation’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 274–291, 1976, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2264884
[27]
J. Horton, Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[28]
H. Beran, The consent theory of political obligation, vol. Croom Helm international series in social and political thought. London: Croom Helm.
[29]
Margaret Gilbert, ‘Reconsidering the “Actual Contract” and Theory of Political Obligation*’, Ethics, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 236–260, 1999, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233895
[30]
C. Pateman, The problem of political obligation: a critique of liberal theory. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1985.
[31]
J. Locke, J. Locke, and J. W. Gough, The second treatise of civil government: and, A letter concerning toleration. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1948.
[32]
D. Hume and A. C. MacIntyre, Hume’s ethical writings: selections from David Hume. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979.
[33]
Patrick Durning, ‘Joseph Raz and the Instrumental Justification of a Duty to Obey the Law’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 597–620, 2003, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3505046
[34]
George Klosko, ‘Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 241–259, 1987, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265266
[35]
G. Klosko, Political Obligations. Oxford University Press, 2005. doi: 10.1093/0199256209.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199256209.001.0001/acprof-9780199256204
[36]
R. Dagger, ‘Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation’, Political Studies, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 104–117, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00253
[37]
George Klosko, ‘Multiple Principles of Political Obligation’, Political Theory, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 801–824, 2004, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4148146
[38]
A. J. Simmons, Justification and legitimacy: essays on rights and obligations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[39]
A. John Simmons, ‘Associative Political Obligations’, Ethics, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 247–273, 1996, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382059
[40]
G. Klosko, The principle of fairness and political obligation, New ed., vol. Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
[41]
Richard J. Arneson, ‘The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems’, Ethics, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 616–633, 1982, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2380394
[42]
John Rawls, ‘Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play’, in Collected papers, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
[43]
R. Dworkin, Law’s empire, vol. Fontana master guides. London: Fontana, 1986.
[44]
D. McDermott, ‘Fair-Play Obligations’, Political Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 216–232, June 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00476.x
[45]
R. Nozick, Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.
[46]
J. Horton, ‘In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One’, Political Studies, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 427–443, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00621.x
[47]
J. Horton, ‘In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two’, Political Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00642.x
[48]
Y. Tamir, Liberal nationalism, vol. Studies in moral, political, and legal philosophy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993.
[49]
Andrew Mason, ‘Special Obligations to Compatriots’, Ethics, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 427–447, 1997, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382324
[50]
Christopher Heath Wellman, ‘Associative Allegiances and Political Obligations’, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 181–204, 1997, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23559181
[51]
Jo Wolff, ‘Political Obligation: A Pluralistic Approach’, in Pluralism: the philosophy and politics of diversity, London: Routledge, 2000. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7365ad01-9bae-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
[52]
J. Rawls, A theory of justice, Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.
[53]
D. LYONS, ‘Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience’, Philosophy Public Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 31–49, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00058.x
[54]
K. Brownlee, ‘Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience’, Res Publica, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 337–351, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6
[55]
Ronald Dworkin, ‘Civil Disobedience’, in Taking rights seriously, London: Duckworth, 1977.
[56]
K. Brownlee, Conscience and Conviction. Oxford University Press, 2012. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001/acprof-9780199592944
[57]
V. Haksar, ‘Rawls and Gandhi on civil disobedience’, Inquiry, vol. 19, no. 1–4, pp. 151–192, Jan. 1976, doi: 10.1080/00201747608601790
[58]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[59]
David Lefkowitz, ‘On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience*’, Ethics, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 202–233, 2007, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/510694
[60]
P. Singer, Democracy and disobedience. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
[61]
P. Singer, Democracy and disobedience. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
[62]
J. Adam and Plato, Platonis Crito, vol. Pitt press series. Cambridge: University press, 1903.
[63]
J. Raz, The authority of lawEssays on law and morality. Oxford University Press, 1979. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001/acprof-9780198253457
[64]
M. Walzer, Obligations: essays on disobedience, war, and citizenship. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1970.
[65]
A. Sabl, ‘Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 331–349, Sept. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00129
[66]
David Enoch, ‘Some Arguments against Conscientious Objection and Civil Disobedience Refuted’, Israel Law Review, vol. 36, pp. 227–253, 2002, Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/israel36&id=629&collection=journals&index=journals/israel
[67]
M. Moore, Ed., National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press, 1998. doi: 10.1093/0198293844.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001/acprof-9780198293842
[68]
A. BUCHANAN, ‘Theories of Secession’, Philosophy Public Affairs, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 31–61, Jan. 1997, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00049.x
[69]
Daniel Philpott, ‘In Defense of Self-Determination’, Ethics, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 352–385, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382349
[70]
David Miller, ‘Secession and the Principle of Nationality’, in National Self-Determination and Secession, M. Moore, Ed., Oxford University Press, 1998. doi: 10.1093/0198293844.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001/acprof-9780198293842
[71]
M. Moore, Ed., National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press, 1998. doi: 10.1093/0198293844.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001/acprof-9780198293842
[72]
Margaret Moore, ‘The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 225–250, Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/caljp13&id=227&collection=journals&index=journals/caljp
[73]
David Gauthier, ‘Breaking up: An Essay on Secession’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 357–371, 1994, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40231872
[74]
Brilmayer, Lea, ‘Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation’, Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 177–202, 1991, Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil16&id=183&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil
[75]
Christopher H. Wellman, ‘A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 142–171, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265391
[76]
C. H. Wellman, A theory of secession: the case for political self-determination. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Available: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/theory-of-secession/79CF1B218C8B49C0EBC9E1493DB75ED7
[77]
A. E. Buchanan, Secession: the morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991.
[78]
A. Buchanan, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. Oxford University Press, 2003. doi: 10.1093/0198295359.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198295359.001.0001/acprof-9780198295358
[79]
S. Macedo and A. E. Buchanan, Secession and self-determination, vol. Nomos. New York, London: New York University Press, 2003.
[80]
Alan Patten, ‘Democratic Secession from a Multinational State*’, Ethics, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 558–586, 2002, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/338778
[81]
C. LIST, ‘The Logical Space of Democracy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 262–297, June 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01206.x
[82]
A. Gutmann, ‘Democracy’, in A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, R. E. Goodin, P. Pettit, and T. Pogge, Eds, Wiley, 2017. doi: 10.1002/9781405177245. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781405177245
[83]
A. K. Sen, ‘Democracy as a Universal Value’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3–17, 1999, doi: 10.1353/jod.1999.0055
[84]
A. Weale, Democracy, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1999.
[85]
D. M. Estlund, Democracy, vol. Blackwell readings in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2001.
[86]
‘Democracy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democracy/
[87]
B. Barry, ‘Is Democracy Special?’, in Democracy and power: essays in political theory I, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, pp. 24–60. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b00a66d1-c0ad-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
[88]
J. A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: G. Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1943.
[89]
A. Quinton, Political philosophy, vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.
[90]
R. A. Dahl, Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[91]
R. Dworkin, Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011. Available: https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=364811&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[92]
T. Christiano, The rule of the many: fundamental issues in democratic theory, vol. Focus (Southern Regional Education Board). Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996.
[93]
Gordon Graham, ‘What is Special About Democracy?’, Mind, vol. 92, no. 365, pp. 94–102, 1983, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2253932
[94]
R. A. Dahl, Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[95]
Richard Arneson, ‘Democracy is not Intrinsically Just’, in Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[96]
C. G. Griffin, ‘Democracy as a Non-Instrumentally Just Procedure’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 111–121, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00169
[97]
P. Parijs, ‘Justice and Democracy: Are they Incompatible?*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101–117, June 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00044.x
[98]
R. J. Arneson, ‘Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 122–132, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00170
[99]
T. Christiano, ‘The Authority of Democracy*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266–290, Sept. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x
[100]
J. Cohen, ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’, in The Good polity: normative analysis of the state, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989, pp. 17–34. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=83a22d24-c1ad-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
[101]
Review by: Joshua Cohen, ‘Reflections on Rousseau: Autonomy and Democracy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 275–297, 1986, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265213
[102]
L. Valentini, ‘Justice, Disagreement and Democracy’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 43, no. 01, pp. 177–199, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000294
[103]
M. Ross, ‘Is Democracy Good for the Poor?’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 860–874, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00220.x
[104]
D. M. Estlund, Democratic authority: a philosophical framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781400831548
[105]
M. Walzer, Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
[106]
I. M. Young, Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2002. doi: 10.1093/0198297556.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198297556.001.0001/acprof-9780198297550
[107]
C. R. Beitz, Political equality: an essay in democratic theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989.
[108]
Jeremy Waldron, ‘The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle’s Politics’, Political Theory, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 563–584, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191901
[109]
Jeremy Waldron, ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 1346–1406, 2006, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/20455656?origin=crossref
[110]
M. Risse, ‘Arguing for Majority Rule*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 41–64, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00190.x
[111]
C. Brettschneider, ‘Balancing Procedures and Outcomes Within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review’, Political Studies, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 423–441, June 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00536.x
[112]
A. Phillips, ‘Democracy and Difference: Some Problems for Feminist Theory’, in The rights of minority cultures, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 288–299. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9bd3e66f-bbb0-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
[113]
Allen Buchanan, ‘Political Legitimacy and Democracy*’, Ethics, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 689–719, 2002, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/340313
[114]
T. Christiano, The Constitution of Equality. Oxford University Press, 2008. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001/acprof-9780198297475
[115]
‘Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule*’, Ethics, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 148–177, 2010, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474
[116]
R. Harrison, Democracy. Routledge, 2002. doi: 10.4324/9780203005545. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134790692
[117]
A. Weale, Democracy, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1999.
[118]
Steven Macedo, ‘Against Majoritarianism: Democratic Values and Institutional Design’, Boston University Law Review, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 1029–1042, Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1029&handle=hein.journals%2Fbulr90&collection=journals
[119]
J. Waldron, Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, 1999. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001/acprof-9780198262138
[120]
Noveck, Scott M., ‘Is Judicial Review Compatible with Democracy?’, Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 401–430, 2007, Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cardplp6&id=407&collection=journals&index=journals/cardplp
[121]
R. Dworkin, Law’s empire, vol. Fontana master guides. London: Fontana, 1986.
[122]
T. Christiano, ‘The Authority of Democracy*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266–290, Sept. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x
[123]
C. LIST and M. KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI, ‘Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 76–110, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01174.x
[124]
D. Miller, ‘Democracy’s Domain’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 201–228, June 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x
[125]
R. E. Goodin, ‘Global democracy: in the beginning’, International Theory, vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 175–209, July 2010, doi: 10.1017/S1752971910000060
[126]
M. Koenig-Archibugi, ‘Is global democracy possible?’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 519–542, Sept. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1354066110366056
[127]
D. Miller, ‘Against Global Democracy’, in After the nation?: critical reflections on nationalism and post-nationalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp. 141–160. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=dd665848-83ae-f011-b412-911797a2cf42
[128]
S. Näsström, ‘The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle’, Political Studies, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 116–134, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x
[129]
R. E. GOODIN, ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 40–68, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x
[130]
T. Macdonald, Global Stakeholder Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2008. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235001.001.0001. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235001.001.0001/acprof-9780199235001
[131]
D. F. Thompson, ‘Democratic Theory and Global Society’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 111–125, June 1999, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00069
[132]
C. C. Gould, Globalizing democracy and human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511617096
[133]
David Held, ‘Democracy and the International System’, in Cosmopolitan democracy: an agenda for a new world order, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1995.
[134]
Robert Dahl, ‘Can International Organisations be Democratic?’, in Democracy’s edges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[135]
Cabrera, Luis, ‘The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy’, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 219–238, 1 AD, Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs/article/inconveniences-of-transnational-democracy/96027C6EE6E68D572DE43E93F9E2C8A8
