[1]
Richard B. Friedman, ‘On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy’, in Authority, New York: New York University Press, 1990, pp. 56–91.
[2]
R. P. Wolff, ‘'The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy’ (Part One of his book In Defense of Anarchism)’, vol. Harper essays in philosophy, New York: Harper & Row, 1976 [Online]. Available: http://www.ditext.com/wolff/anarchy.html
[3]
Harry G. Frankfurt, ‘The Anarchism of Robert Paul Wolff’, Political Theory, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 405–414, 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191060
[4]
P. Laslett, W. G. Runciman, Q. Skinner, and R. Tuck, ‘Why is Authority Such a Problem? in Philosophy, politics and society: 4th series’, Oxford: Blackwell, 1972.
[5]
Joseph Raz, ‘Authority and Justification’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–29, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265235
[6]
J. Horton, Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[7]
J. T. Sanders, J. Narveson, and A. J. Simmons, ‘Philosophical Anarchism in For and against the state: new philosophical readings’, vol. Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996.
[8]
J. T. Sanders, J. Narveson, and J. Wolff, ‘Anarchism and Skepticism’ in For and against the state: new philosophical readings’, vol. Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996.
[9]
A. J. Simmons, ‘ch. VIII Moral principles and political obligations’, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[10]
M. B. E. Smith, ‘Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law?’, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 950–976, Apr. 1973, doi: 10.2307/795537. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/795537
[11]
Allen Buchanan, ‘Political Legitimacy and Democracy’, Ethics, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 689–719, Jul. 2002, doi: 10.1086/340313. [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/et/2002/112/4
[12]
Arthur Ripstein, ‘Authority and Coercion’, Philosophy Public Affairs, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 2–35, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00003.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10884963/2004/32/1
[13]
D. Miller, Anarchism, vol. Modern ideologies. London: Dent, 1984.
[14]
Hanna Pitkin, ‘Obligation and Consent—I.’, American Political Science Review, vol. 59, no. 04, pp. 990–999, Dec. 1965, doi: 10.2307/1953218. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/issue/F8AA96DF97C012FEEB99E9B12CA5A918
[15]
Hanna Pitkin, ‘Obligation and Consent—II’, American Political Science Review, vol. 60, no. 01, pp. 39–52, Mar. 1966, doi: 10.2307/1953805. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/issue/24A914117BE0021AC850DB8B4C154BFC
[16]
George Klosko, ‘Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 241–259, 1987 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265266
[17]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[18]
J. Horton, Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[19]
Margaret Gilbert, ‘Reconsidering the "Actual Contract” Theory of Political Obligation’, Ethics, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 236–260, Jan. 1999, doi: 10.1086/233895. [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/et/1999/109/2
[20]
H. Beran, The consent theory of political obligation, vol. Croom Helm international series in social and political thought. London: Croom Helm, 1987.
[21]
D. M. Estlund, ‘Normative Consent’, in Democratic authority: a philosophical framework, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781400831548
[22]
Cynthia A. Stark, ‘Hypothetical Consent and Justification’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 313–344, Jun. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678406
[23]
G. Klosko, The principle of fairness and political obligation, New ed., vol. Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
[24]
D. McDermott, ‘Fair-Play Obligations’, Political Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 216–232, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00476.x.
[25]
R. Nozick, Anarchy, state, and Utopia. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1974.
[26]
C. Pateman, The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity, 1988.
[27]
C. Pateman and C. W. Mills, Contract and domination. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
[28]
A. J. Simmons, ‘Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later’, in Justification and legitimacy: essays on rights and obligations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[29]
R. J. Arneson, ‘The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems’, Ethics, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 616–633, Jul. 1982, doi: 10.1086/292379.
[30]
Gordon Graham, ‘What is Special About Democracy?’, Mind, vol. XCII, no. 365, pp. 94–102, 1983, doi: 10.1093/mind/XCII.365.94. [Online]. Available: https://academic.oup.com/mind/issue/XCII/365
[31]
Keith Dowding, Robert E. Goodin, and Carole Pateman, Eds., Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490217
[32]
Thomas, Christiano, ‘Democracy as Equality’, in Democracy, David, Estlund, Ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, pp. 31–50 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ab47e4c3-5ba1-ed11-ac20-0050f2f06092
[33]
A. Swift, Political philosophy: a beginners’ guide for students and politicians, 2nd ed., rev.Expanded. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.
[34]
D. M. Patterson, Wiley InterScience (Online service), and A. Gutmann, ‘Democracy in A companion to philosophy of law and legal theory’, 2nd ed., vol. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114
[35]
Anne Phillips, ‘Must Feminists Give up on Liberal Democracy?’, Political Studies, vol. 40, no. 1_suppl, pp. 68–82, Aug. 1992, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01813.x. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/psxa/40/1_suppl
[36]
R. A. Dahl, Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
[37]
D. Miller, L. Siedentop, and P. Jones, ‘Political Equality and Majority Rule in The nature of political theory’, Oxford: Clarendon, 1983.
[38]
P. Singer, Democracy and disobedience. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
[39]
Anne Phillips, Engendering democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
[40]
A. Weale, ‘Chapter 1 in Democracy’, 2nd ed., vol. Issues in political theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
[41]
Christopher G. Griffin, ‘Democracy as a Non-Instrumentally Just Procedure’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 111–121, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00169. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14679760/2003/11/1
[42]
Thomas Christiano, ‘The Authority of Democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266–290, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14679760/2004/12/3
[43]
B. Barry, ‘Is Democracy Special? in Democracy and power: essays in political theory I’, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
[44]
A. Quinton, ‘chs. 21 and 22; reprinted as ‘Two Concepts of Democracy in Political philosophy’, vol. Oxford readings in philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.
[45]
Richard J. Arneson, ‘Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 122–132, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00170. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14679760/2003/11/1
[46]
Gerhard Øverland and Christian Barry, ‘Do Democratic Societies Have a Right to Do Wrong?’, Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 111–131, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01524.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14679833/2011/42/2
[47]
Laura Valentini, ‘Justice, Disagreement and Democracy’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 43, no. 01, pp. 177–199, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000294. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/issue/4359D4B9F732686E9BBAB7C9A9186B8C
[48]
S. Shute, S. L. Hurley, and J. Elster, ‘Majority rule and individual rights’ in On human rights: the Oxford Amnesty lectures 1993’, New York: Basic Books, 1993.
[49]
Cecile Fabre, ‘A Philosophical Argument for a Bill of Rights’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 77–98, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/194114
[50]
J. Waldron, ‘The Constitutional Conception of Democracy’, in Law and disagreement, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
[51]
Annabelle Lever, ‘Democracy and Judicial Review: Are They Really Incompatible?’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 7, no. 04, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1017/S1537592709991812. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/issue/56A532D65C2087F415032DB45351F2F9
[52]
A. Weale, ‘Chapter 8 in Democracy’, 2nd ed., vol. Issues in political theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
[53]
J. Waldron, ‘Part III in Law and disagreement’, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
[54]
Corey Brettschneider, ‘Balancing Procedures and Outcomes within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review’, Political Studies, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 423–441, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00536.x. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/psxa/53/2
[55]
Aileen Kavanagh, ‘Participation and Judicial Review: A Reply to Jeremy Waldron’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 451–486, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3505148
[56]
Macedo, S., ‘Against Majoritarianism: Democratic Values and Institutional Design’, Boston University Law Review, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/bulr90&id=1035
[57]
T. Christiano, ‘Chapter 7 in The constitution of equality: democratic authority and its limits’, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[58]
T. Christiano, ‘The Authority of Democracy*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266–290, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x.
[59]
Waldron, J., ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’, Yale Law Journal, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/ylr115&id=1366
[60]
Alon Harel, ‘Rights-Based Judicial Review: A Democratic Justification’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 247–276, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3505108
[61]
Larry Alexander, ‘What is the problem with judicial review?’, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, vol. 31, pp. 1–13, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ajlph31&i=5
[62]
J. H. Ely, Democracy and distrust: A theory of judicial review. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1980.
[63]
R. Dworkin, Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.
[64]
Noveck, Scott M., ‘Is Judicial Review Compatible with Democracy?’, Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1019202#%23
[65]
Bhikhu Parekh, ‘A Misconceived Discourse on Political Obligation’, Political Studies, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 236–251, Jun. 1993, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.tb00926.x. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/psxa/41/2
[66]
Loren E. Lomasky and Geoffrey Brennan, ‘Is there a Duty to Vote?’, Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 17, no. 01, pp. 62–86, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1017/S0265052500002533. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy/issue/B3FDA4D613401194335A30681A386873
[67]
Christopher Kutz, ‘The Collective Work of Citizenship’, Legal Theory, vol. 8, no. 04, pp. 471–494, Dec. 2002 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/legal-theory/article/collective-work-of-citizenship/689B3781BD61E8A8C06D51D462FE306E
[68]
R. Dagger, ‘Chapter 9 in Civic virtues: rights, citizenship, and republican liberalism’, vol. Oxford political theory, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
[69]
E. A. Beerbohm, ‘Democratic Complicity (Chapter 9)’, in In our name: the ethics of democracy, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2012, pp. 226–251 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7rtcj
[70]
J. Brennan, The ethics of voting. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7rt0m
[71]
Alvin I. Goldman, ‘Why Citizens Should Vote: A Causal Responsibility Approach’, Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 16, no. 02, pp. 201–217, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1017/S0265052500002442. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy/issue/D36C9FA80CABBCE5BBFA4CD13DF695DD
[72]
I. Honohan, Civic republicanism, vol. Problems of philosophy series. London: Routledge, 2002.
[73]
P. Sheehy, ‘A Duty Not to Vote’, Ratio, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 46–57, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1111/1467-9329.00175.
[74]
T. Christiano, ‘Chapter 5 & 7 in The rule of the many: fundamental issues in democratic theory’, vol. Focus (Southern Regional Education Board), Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996.
[75]
I. M. Young, ‘The Social Connection Model’, in Responsibility for Justice, Oxford University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195392388.001.0001/acprof-9780195392388
[76]
A. A. GUERRERO, ‘The Paradox of Voting and the Ethics of Political Representation’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 272–306, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2010.01188.x.
[77]
D. Miller, Strangers in our midst: the political philosophy of immigration. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4515684
[78]
Arash Abizadeh, ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion’, Political Theory, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 37–65, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0090591707310090. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/ptxa/36/1
[79]
S. Fine, ‘Immigration and Discrimination’, in Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership, First edition., S. Fine and L. Ypi, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.001.0001
[80]
David Miller, ‘The Ethical Significance of Nationality’, Ethics, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 647–662, Jul. 1988, doi: 10.1086/292997. [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/et/1988/98/4
[81]
David Miller, ‘Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh’, Political Theory, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 111–120, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1177/0090591709348194. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/ptxa/38/1
[82]
S. Scheffler, ‘Individual Responsibility in a Global Age’, in Boundaries and allegiances: problems of justice and responsibility in liberal thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199257671.001.0001
[83]
David Miller, ‘Democracy’s Domain’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 201–228, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10884963/2009/37/3
[84]
Sofia Näsström, ‘The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle’, Political Studies, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 116–134, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/psxa/59/1
[85]
Michael, Walzer, ‘Three Distributive Principles’, in Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality, Oxford: Robertson, 1983, pp. 21–26 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=84b43892-4333-ed11-bd6e-0050f2f06092
[86]
David Miller, ‘Territorial Boundaries: A Liberal-Egalitarian Perspective’, in Boundaries and justice: diverse ethical perspectives, vol. Ethikon series in comparative ethics, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001, pp. 249–275 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1h9dj5p
[87]
M. C. Nussbaum, J. Cohen, and M. Nussbaum, ‘For Love of Country? Debating the Limits of Patriotism’ in For love of country: debating the limits of patriotism’, Boston: Beacon Press, 1996.
[88]
Tommie Shelby, ‘Justice, Deviance, and the Dark Ghetto’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 126–160, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00106.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10884963/2007/35/2
[89]
Candice Delmas, ‘Political Resistance: A Matter of Fairness’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 465–488, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10982-013-9189-y. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/journal/10982/volumes-and-issues/33-4
[90]
Bernard Boxill, ‘Self-Respect and Protest’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 1976 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265062
[91]
Daniel Silvermint, ‘Resistance and Well-being’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 405–425, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1111/jopp.12002. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14679760/2013/21/4
[92]
T. Shelby, Dark ghettos: injustice, dissent, and reform. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016.
[93]
Bernard R. Boxill, ‘The Responsibility of the Oppressed to Resist Their Own Oppression’, Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2009.01474.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14679833/2010/41/1
[94]
A. E. Cudd, Analyzing oppression, vol. Studies in feminist philosophy. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195187431.001.0001
[95]
A. Lorde, ‘The Transformation of Silence into Language and Action’, in Sister outsider: essays and speeches, Revised edition., Berkeley: Crossing Press, 2007.
[96]
H. Caygill, On resistance: a philosophy of defiance. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
[97]
Carol Hay, ‘The Obligation to Resist Oppression’, Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 21–45, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2010.01518.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14679833/2011/42/1
[98]
Thomas E. Jr Hill, ‘Symbolic protest and calculated silence’, in Autonomy and self-respect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 52–66 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/autonomy-and-selfrespect/symbolic-protest-and-calculated-silence/928AC831C9A5C53A7D52562CBD682F63
[99]
Thomas E. Hill, ‘Servility and Self-Respect’, Monist, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 87–104, 1973, doi: 10.5840/monist197357135. [Online]. Available: https://academic.oup.com/monist/issue/57/1
[100]
David Brooks, ‘On Living in an Unjust Society’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24353341
[101]
M. Walzer, ‘The Obligation to Disobey’ and ‘“The Obligations of Oppressed Minorities” in Obligations: essays on disobedience, war, and citizenship’, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1970.
[102]
J. Rawls, ‘Chapter VII sections 55-59’, in A theory of justice, Rev. ed., Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.
[103]
David Lyons, ‘Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience’, Philosophy Public Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 31–49, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00058.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10884963/1998/27/1
[104]
Kimberley Brownlee, Conscience and Conviction. Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001/acprof-9780199592944
[105]
Martin Luther King Jr, ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail [King, Jr.]’. [Online]. Available: https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
[106]
H. D. Thoreau, ‘Civil Disobedience’, 1849. [Online]. Available: https://www.walden.org/web/viewer.html?file=https://www.walden.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CivilDisobedience.pdf
[107]
R. Dworkin, ‘Civil Disobedience and Nuclear Protest’, in A matter of principle, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1985.
[108]
David Lefkowitz, ‘On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience’, Ethics, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 202–233, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1086/510694. [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/et/2007/117/2
[109]
Daniel Markovits, ‘Democratic Disobedience’, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1897–1952, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4135751
[110]
R. Dworkin, Taking rights seriously. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
[111]
Vinit Haksar, ‘Rawls and Gandhi on civil disobedience’, Inquiry, vol. 19, no. 1–4, pp. 151–192, Jan. 1976, doi: 10.1080/00201747608601790. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/sinq20/19/1-4
[112]
K. Greenawalt, Conflicts of law and morality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
[113]
John Morreall, ‘The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–47, Jan. 1976, doi: 10.1080/00455091.1976.10716975. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-philosophy/issue/734EB36FCD2AD6BF7EBD04824899986C
[114]
P. Singer, Democracy and disobedience. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
[115]
J. Raz, The authority of law: essays on law and morality, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[116]
M. Walzer, ‘Part 1 in Obligations: essays on disobedience’, in Obligations: essays on disobedience, war, and citizenship, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1970.
[117]
Andrew Sabl, ‘Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 307–330, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00129. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14679760/2001/9/3
[118]
David Enoch, ‘Some Arguments Against Conscientious Objection and Civil Disobedience Refuted’, Israel Law Review, vol. 36, no. 03, pp. 227–253, 2002, doi: 10.1017/S0021223700018045. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/israel-law-review/issue/145ED2354E3E1E13F48C4DCF628420C1
[119]
Hugo Adam Bedau, ‘Civil Disobedience and Personal Responsibility for Injustice’, Monist, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 517–535, 1970, doi: 10.5840/monist197054432. [Online]. Available: https://academic.oup.com/monist/issue/54/4
[120]
Mohandas Gandhi, author. Anthony J. Parel, editor of compilation., ‘Indian Home Rule [or Hind Swaraj] in Gandhi: “Hind Swaraj” and Other Writings / Mohandas Gandhi, Edited by Anthony J. Parel.’, [Online]. Available: http://gandhiserve.org/cwmg/VOL010.PDF
[121]
F. Fanon, ‘Concerning Violence’, in The Wretched of the Earth, 1963 [Online]. Available: http://abahlali.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Frantz-Fanon-The-Wretched-of-the-Earth-1965.pdf
[122]
Nelson Mandela, ‘The Rivonia Trial’, in No easy walk to freedom: articles, speeches and trial addresses of Nelson Mandela, London: Heinemann Educational, 1973, pp. 162–189 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ab43bf1b-9532-ed11-bd6e-0050f2f06092
[123]
Jeff McMahan, ‘The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing’, Philosophical Issues, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 386–405, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2005.00073.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/17582237/2005/15/1
[124]
Cheney Ryan, ‘Bearers of Hope: On the Paradox of Non-Violent Action’, in Soft war: the ethics of unarmed conflict, Michael L. Gross and Tamar Meisels, Eds. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 166–183 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316450802.014
[125]
Vittorio Bufacchi, ‘Exploitation, Injustice and Violence’, in Violence and social justice, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 145–163 [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230246416_9
[126]
C. A. J. Coady, ‘Chapters 2 and 3 in Morality and political violence’, in Morality and Political Violence, 2008.
[127]
P. Moraro, ‘Violent Civil Disobedience and Willingness to Accept Punishment’, Essays in Philosophy, vol. 8, no. 2, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1277&context=eip
[128]
E. Frazer and K. Hutchings, ‘On Politics and Violence: Arendt Contra Fanon’, Contemporary Political Theory, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 90–108, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300328.
[129]
Ted. Honderich Ted Honderich, Violence for equality : inquiries in political philosophy / Ted Honderich. [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_LMS_DS000079578&indx=1&recIds=UCL_LMS_DS000079578&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Violence%20for%20Equality%3A%20Inquiries%20in%20Political%20Philosophy&dstmp=1501678797980
[130]
Martin Luther King, ‘The Power of Non-violence, speech from 1957’. [Online]. Available: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-power-of-non-violence/
[131]
A. Sabl, ‘Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 307–330, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00129.
[132]
Vinit Haksar, ‘Violence in a spirit of love: Gandhi and the limits of non-violence’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 303–324, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1080/13698230.2011.644422. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fcri20/15/3
[133]
A. Roberts and T. Garton Ash, Civil resistance and power politics: the experience of non-violent action from Gandhi to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
